Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The nonlinear behavior is approximated as a sequence of successively changing linear systems over a
short time interval. Solution of nonlinear equations needs to iterative method such as Iterative
algorithm. Iterative method attempts to solve a problem by finding successive approximations. The
present study is concerned with methods of nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of structures,
particularly for application to geometrically nonlinear space structures. The basis of the proposed
method is a step-by-step procedure of parametric solution continuation using a predictorcorrector
scheme. The prediction is made with help of some interpolation procedure. In this paper a simplex
method of nonlinear dynamics response analysis is developed.
Key words: Analytical method, optimization of energy, iterative algorithm, finite element method, analyzing
modal, nonlinear dynamic response.
INTRODUCTION
The Analytical method is amongst the most efficient
methods known for finding null spaces, which is the final
stage in integer factorization algorithms such as the
quadratic sieve and number field sieve, and its development has been entirely driven by this application. The first
iterative method for solving a linear system appeared in a
letter of Gauss. The Analytical method is an iterative
algorithm that is an adaptation of power methods to find
Eigen values and eigenvectors of a square matrix or the
singular value decomposition of a rectangular matrix
(Brezinski and Sadok, 2002; Ghafari, 2008). Minimum
potential dynamic energy asserts that a structure or body
shall deform or displace to a position that minimizes the
total potential energy, with the lost potential energy being
dissipated as heat. The tendency to minimum total
potential energy is due to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of a system will
maximize at equilibrium. The design process for nonlinear structure is a relatively complex problem. Indeed
the equilibrium configuration is an unknown in the
analysis of this kind of structures. The nonlinear structure
692
+ C (t)
+ K (t) x = P (t)
(1)
g ji = W X ji =
P=
Q=
q
n =1
U n X ji F ji
F=
Let
T jn = the initial tension in member jn,
jn
jn
+P
+ QX = F
(2)
(3)
Where;
W= the total potential energy
U= the strain energy of the system, and
V= the potential energy of the loading.
Q=
g ji =
W =
m
n =1
Un +
j =1 i =1
F ji X
ji
(4)
Where;
M= total number of members,
J = total number of cable joints,
Fj i= external applied load on joint j in direction i, and
Xji= displacement of joint j in direction i.
The condition for structural equilibrium is that the total
ji
U n e jn
.
F ji
n =1 e jn X ji
q
(7)
U jn = T jn e jn +
(6)
(5)
EA 2
e jn
2 L jn
(8)
U jn e jn = T
jn
EA
e jn = T jn
L jn
(9)
L2jn =
3
i =1
( X ni X ji ) 2
(10)
Hashamdar et al.
( L jn + e jn ) =
2
3
i =1
( X ni X ji + x ni x ji ) 2
jn
3
i=1
{(X ni X ji )
(2X ni 2X ji + X ni X ji )}
j =1 i=1
Vji(k) = g ji(k) +
from
1
e jn =
2Ljn + e jn
(11)
J
j =1 i=1
693
g ji(k) g ji(k)
Vji(k1)
g ji(k1) g ji(k1)
(16)
(12)
W (k ) S (k ) = 0
(17)
1
ejn X ji =
(Xni X ji + Xni X ji )
Ljn +ejn
(13)
g ji =
q
n=1
t jn ( X ni X ji + X ni X ji ) Fji
(14)
Where the suffices (k) and (k+1) denote the (k)th and
(k+1)th iterate respectively and where (Benner and
Martin, 2010).
1
(a1 + a 2 S + a3 S 2 )
2 L jn + e jn
(18)
Where;
a1 =
X ji ( k +1) = X ji ( k ) + S ( k )V ji ( k )
e jn =
3
i =1
(2( x ni x ji )( x ni x ji ) +
(19)
( x ni x ji )( x ni x ji ))
a2 =
a3 =
3
i =1
3
i =1
2(( x ni x ji + x ni x ji )(v ni v ji ))
(20)
(v ni v ji ) 2
(21)
W = C1S 4 + C2 S 3 + C3S 2 + C4 S + C5
( 2)
694
W S = 4C1 S 3 + 3C 2 S 2 + 2C3 S + C 4
(23)
Where;
m
C1 =
n =1
C2 =
n =1
EA
a 32 ) n
2
2 L (2 L + e)
EA
a2 a3 ) n
L (2 L + e) 2
T
EA
C3 = ( a3 +
(a2 +2a1a3))n
2 2
2L(2L+e)
n=1 2L+e
(23 a)
( 3 b)
C4 =
C5 =
n=1
m
n=1
J 3
T
EA
)
a2 +
a
a
FjiVji
1 2 n
2L + e
L(2L + e)2
j=1 i=1
J 3
T
EA
2
a1 +
a
)
Fji X ji
1 n
2L + e
2L(2L + e)2
j =1 i=1
(23 c)
(23 d)
(23 e)
Hashamdar et al.
695
LOAD(N) = 1000
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 2 ( LVDT )
( T E ) / T*100
178.6E-03
177.6E-03
0.56
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 3 ( LVDT )
129.3E-03
127.9E-03
1.08
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 4 ( LVDT )
50.75E-03
50.11E-03
1.26
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 5 ( LVDT )
127.9E-03
127.15E-03
0.59
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 6 ( LVDT )
50.75E-03
50.15E-03
1.18
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 9 ( LVDT )
25.83E-03
24.33E-03
5.81
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 10 ( LVDT )
74.46E-03
72.56E-03
2.55
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 11 ( LVDT )
135.7E-03
133.25E-03
1.81
Z AXIS DEFLECTIONS(m)
NODE 12 ( LVDT )
135.7E-03
134.99E-03
0.52
history response of solution variable such as displacements will usually oscillate with increasing amplitude and
CONCLUSIONS
Advantages of simplex method are such as, it solves the
complex non linear Eigen value problem and it is able to
account for a strong variation of the modulus with
696
Hashamdar et al.
697
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
Frequency
renovation explicit
1.4083
1.42645
1.5645
1.7224
2.1568
Frequency (Hz)
finite element
1.4321
1.4151
1.4945
1.7041
2.0823
Differentials percentage
1.69
0.8
4.47
1.06
3.45