times to punish people with a variety of offenses. The bible also advocates death for murder and other crimes such as kidnapping and stealing. Here in the Philippines, we used to have Death Penalty, but I believe this capital punishment should be issued in all states for those people who commit great crimes. Death Penalty should be issued because death is being feared, it gives Justice, it is a fact that there's no proof of an innocent being executed and there are some quotations from the bible that seem to respond this. Most people have a natural fear of death and I, myself, am afraid of it. Just think about it; if you die, you'll leave this world and never come back. If we have Death Penalty and a murderer dies instantly, the homicide rate would decrease because no one likes to die. Death Penalty is important because it could save the lives of thousands of potential victims who are at stake. Another one is that Death Penalty shows justice. There will be justice when we punish the guilty. It shows equality. On t.v., I have seen people being interviewed because one or some of their relatives died. They are crying for help and wanting justice for the death of their loved ones. I know for sure that justice can only be the solution for them to be relieved. A serious crime must have serious penalty and that is death. Justice can dignify a person. People who oppose death penalty claim that in the implementation of this capital punishment, innocent men are wrongly executed. According to "ProDeathPenalty" , there has never been any proof of it. Moreover, our criminal justice system takes extra precautions to be sure the innocent are protected. What's the use of the judges who were trained in this field? They also want to make sure who is guilty and not. Death Penalty is like "an eye for an eye". Death Penalty helps curtail future murderers and because of this we can save more lives. If Death Penalty exists, repeat murderers are eliminated and future murders are deterred. Just imagine it; we will live in a just society. If death Penalty wouldn't be issued now, then when? When there are more criminals lurking? It is said that every minute, there is a chance that an innocent man could get murdered. We must put a stop to it. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT The expression Capital Punishment or the Death Penalty is ambiguous, referring to a species of acts, acts of executing someone for conduct judge to be criminal. It often refers to a certain kind of social institution. The institution of capital punishment is one pattern of punishment that forms part of our legal system in many, but not all, societies. It involves certain roles like those of the executioner and the criminal and certain rules such as the rule that only person condemned to death by courts is to be executed. In most society, the punishment for murder is execution. In the Philippines we have the same act, the R.A. no. 7659 or the death penalty act.
ARGUMENTS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
The classical and contemporary literature on the subject of capital punishment provides several very plausible arguments designed to prove that the act of executing a person for conduct judge to be criminal is sometimes right. The death penalty itself on the other hand could strike fear in the minds of those criminals and make them think twice before committing any act of violence. That the Capital punishment may act as an instrument with which the righteous may be guarded against the offender. The enforcement of Capital Punishment under proper circumstances places a high value on human life and upholds dignity of man, than making him stop to the level of criminals by lashing out at them with similar brutality in the guise of justice. Prevention Capital punishment is sometimes morally justified as a means of preventing the criminal from committing additional crimes. By his past action the criminal has shown himself to be wicked and dangerous. Anyone deprived enough to murder or rape once is very likely to act in socially harmful ways again. The only sure way to prevent such a person from going on to murder or rape in the future is to execute him. Imprisonment is a far less effective means of protecting society from such dangerous criminals. Most prisoners are freed after a time-often having become most dangerous than when they entered prison-by parole, pardon or the expiration of their sentences. In any case, escape is always possible. And even within the confines of prison, a condemned criminal may murder or rape a guard, a fellow inmate or a visitor. Executing a condemned criminal is the only sure way to prevent him from committing additional acts of crime. Since it is the only right to protect the innocent member of the society from the most serious crimes, capital punishment is sometimes right. Retribution While the arguments from preventions and deterrence look to the future and attempt to justify capital punishment by an appeal to the future harm it will avoid, the argument from retribution looks to the past and tries to justify capital punishment as the right response to the wrong that has been done. Granted that society would be unjustified in taking a person's life in punishment for any trivial crime, capital punishment is just retribution for the greatest crimes. If one person has killed another, it is only fir that he give his own life in return. Kidnapping and rape are also very wrong that the person who commits these acts deserves the greatest penalty, death. Justice demands that each individual be treated by others and by society as he deserves. The person who does good act ought to be rewarded with good, and the person who does evil ought to suffer evil-each in proportion to the good or evil done. The conception of justice implicit in this argument has
traditionally been illustrated by the figure of a blindfold woman holding a set of
balance scales. The woman is blindfolded so that she cannot recognize her friends and enemies and award the former more good and the latter more evil than they deserve. The balance scale symbolizes the element of retribution, the notion that good or evil are to be awarded in return to the good or evil he has done. Applied to punishment, this means that the punishment should fit the crime that the evil inflicted upon the condemned criminal should be in proportion to the degree of harm he has done. Since the only penalty bad enough to equal the greatest crime is death, and since justice requires that the criminal receive just retribution for his past misdeeds, and since it is right to do what justice requires, capital punishment or death penalty is sometimes right. Self-Defense Capital punishment is sometimes right because it is sometimes an exercise of society's right to self defense. Although it is generally wrong for one human being to take the life of another, there are exceptional cases where this is morally justified, A person has right to kill his attacker if this is necessary to preserve his life or limb. Society, like the individual, has the right to preserve itself when its very existence is threatened. Now a murderer attacks not only his individual victim, but the society itself. Since society is constituted by aggregate of individuals, to kill one or more individual is already to begin to exterminate the society. Moreover, certain laws, such as the law prohibiting murder, are necessary if any collections of individuals are to live together in organized society. Hence, to break those laws that alone make the existence of society possible is to threaten that society with death. Capital punishment is sometimes right because it is right for society to exercise its self defense, and in extreme cases capital punishment or death penalty does not defend the society from the attacks of a criminal that threaten its very existence. Capital punishment or the death penalty is the act of killing or executing a person, who was found guilty of a serious crime, by the government. Without a doubt, executions are considered the ultimate punishment for a crime, because there is no repeal from death. The logical alternative for capital punishment is life in prison without parole, yet a lot of nations still perform the death penalty. This is because the debate whether capital punishment is ethical and justifiable is still widely disputed. Therefore, lets review each reason for and against capital punishment to determine if it is ethical and logical. Reasons For Capital Punishment 1. Prison: There are three purposes for prison. First, prison separates criminals for the safety of the general population. Second, prison is a form of
punishment. Third and finally, the punishment of prison is expected to
rehabilitate prisoners; so that when prisoners are released from prison, these ex-convicts are less likely to repeat their crimes and risk another prison sentence. The logic for capital punishment is that prisons are for rehabilitating convicts who will eventually leave prison, and therefore prison is not for people who would never be released from prisons alive. 2. Cost of Prison: Typically, the cost of imprisoning someone for life is much more expensive than executing that same person. However with the expensive costs of appeals in courts of law, it is arguable if capital punishment is truly cost effective when compared with the cost of life imprisonment. 3. Safety: Criminals who receive the death penalty are typically violent individuals. Therefore for the safety of the prisons guards, other prisoners, and the general public (in case a death row inmate escapes prison), then logic dictates that safety is a reason for capital punishment. 4. Deters Crime: There is no scientific proof that nations with capital punishment have a lower rate of crime, therefore the risk of the death penalty does not seem to deter crime. 5. Extreme Punishment: The logic is that the more severe the crime, then the more severe the punishment is necessary. But what is the most severe punishment: lifetime in prison or execution? I am not sure that anyone alive is qualified to answer this question. 6. Appropriate Punishment: It is commonly believed that the punishment of a crime should equal the crime, if possible. This is also known as "an eye for eye" justice. Therefore using this logic, the appropriate punishment for murder is death. 7. Vengeance: Some crimes are so horrific that some people think that revenge or retribution is the only option. This reasoning is not based on logic; but rather, it is based on emotions. Therefore, this reason should not be deemed a valid justification.