Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
The three basic needs of man are Food, Cloth and Shelter Civil engineer has relevance
with all basic needs of man directly or indirectly. Man has progressed lot in
developing the methods of constructing shelters. Initially man use to stay in huts and
as the time passed it developed into house that is load bearing. And nowadays RCC
frame structure has dominant share in construction practices. So all this structures
were renovated or constructed by using many advanced techniques and materials. And
from many advanced materials carbon fibre is also a very good material for
construction.
Carbon fibre, alternatively graphite fibre, carbon graphite or CF is a material
consisting of fibres about 510 m in diameter and composed mostly
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
43
editor@iaeme.com
of carbon atoms. The carbon atoms are bonded together in crystals that are more or
less aligned parallel to the long axis of the fibre. The properties of carbon fibres, such
as high stiffness, high tensile strength, low weight, high chemical resistance, high
temperature tolerance and low thermal expansion make them very popular in
aerospace, civil engineering, military, and motorsports along with other competition
sports. Carbon lamination is a two components composite material consisting of high
strength fibers embedded in polymer matrix. Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) sheets
are innovative and sustainable building material being developed during last 20-30
years.
To achieve objective the work was related to repair and strengthening of
engineering structures and it deals with the design for strengthening of concrete
structures by carbon fiber composites. [1]R & M international Pvt. Ltd is company
which deals with strengthening and retrofitting works. They studied the properties and
made use of carbon fiber for their conventional use. The company had carried the
rehabilitation of Karal Railway Over Bridge, Navi Mumbai which got functioned in
1991 and the length of bridge is 700m. [2]. The Flexural strengthening of Glued
Laminated Timber Beams with Steel and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. The aim
of this thesis is to study the overall behaviour of reinforced Glulam beams loaded in
flexure and to study in comparison the strengthening effect of steel and CFRP[3].
Axial testing of columns confined with carbon fiber polymers and also studied the
effect of orientation of fiber. Tests were conducted to demonstrate the concrete
confinement capability of FRP laminates consisting of carbon fibers with different
fiber orientations including 45-degree direction and different concrete cross section
(circular and rectangular). The performance of the 45-degree FRP laminates is
compared to that of unidirectional FRP laminates of different manufacturers and
amounts of materials. [4].This study presents a study on the ductility performance of
hybrid fibre reinforced concrete. The influence of fibre content on the ductility
performance of hybrid fibre reinforced concrete specimens having different fibre
volume fractions was investigated. The parameters of investigation included modulus
of rupture, ultimate load, service load, ultimate and service load deflection, crack
width, energy ductility and deflection ductility. [5]. Wood properties are often
inappropriate for heavy loads construction applications. Major drawbacks like
durability and high variability among the properties present in timber can be reduced
by using glued-laminated timber. A further step to decrease this variability has been
widely investigated during the last decades by bonding FRP (carbon, aramid and glass
fibres) to timber or glulam beams [6].There is a large world-wide need for simple and
reliable methods to repair and strengthen aging infrastructure and buildings. The use
of cementitious fibre composites offers several advantages over the existing methods.
No other work on strengthening of structural concrete with cementitious composites
reinforced with continuous high strength fibres was identified when the present work
started in 1998. At present time, 2003, it still is a new technique and very little
research has been internationally reported. This work includes a literature survey
describing the state of the art of the strengthening of structural concrete with cement
based fibre reinforced composites [7]. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) systems for
strengthening concrete structures are an alternative to traditional strengthening
techniques, such as steel plate bonding, section enlargement, and external posttensioning. FRP strengthening systems use FRP composite materials as supplemental
externally bonded reinforcement. FRP systems offer advantages over traditional
strengthening techniques: they are lightweight, relatively easy to install, and are
noncorrosive. Due to the characteristics of FRP materials as well as the behaviour of
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
44
editor@iaeme.com
members strengthened with FRP, specific guidance on the use of these systems is
needed. This document offers general information on the history and use of FRP
strengthening systems; a description of the unique material properties of FRP [8].
Beams and slabs externally reinforced with FRP are often in contact with moisture
and temperature cycles that reduce the expected durability of the system. Bond
degradation is a frequent cause of premature failure of structural elements and
environmental conditions are known to relate to such failures. The study shows the
effects of cycles of salt fog, temperature and moisture as well as immersion in salt
water on the bending response of beams externally reinforced with GFRP or CFRP,
especially on bond between FRP reinforcement and concrete. Temperature cycles (10
C; 10 C) and moisture cycles were associated with failure in the concrete substrate,
while salt fog cycles originated failure at the interface concreteadhesive. Immersion
in salt water and salt fog caused considerable degradation of bond between the GFRP
strips and concrete. However, immersion did not lower the load carrying capacity of
beams, unlike temperature cycles (10 C; 10 C) that caused considerable loss. No
significant differences were detected on the behaviour of the systems strengthened
with GFRP and CFRP [9]. FRP jackets were investigated for their confinement
effectiveness on rectangular RC columns. Thirteen reduced-scale short columns were
tested to failure in axial compression. Variables investigated include: the type of
fibers (AFRP, CFRP or GFRP), the thickness of the jacket, the aspect ratio of the
rectangular cross section and the radii of the corners. For square columns, GFRP
jackets were observed to increase the ultimate axial stress and strain more effectively
than either AFRP or CFRP jackets [10].
SI unit
Tensile Strength
Tensile Modulus
Ultimate Elongation
Density
4,900 MPa
230,000 MPa
2.1%
1.8 g/cm3
SI unit
Tensile Strength
2,750 MPa
Tensile Modulus
16,500 MPa
Ultimate Elongation
1.7%
Density
1.3 g/cm3
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
45
editor@iaeme.com
3. PROCEDURE OF LAMINATION
The execution of strengthening should be carried out according to the following steps.
Special care should always be taken to ensure the high quality of work.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
46
editor@iaeme.com
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
47
editor@iaeme.com
Resin layer is applied on the surface of the member and the fibres are put into this
resin layer in-situ in the form of fabrics. The fabrics are covered again with a resin
layer. This procedure can be repeated several times. The successive fabric layers are
embedded into the previous resin layer. Fabrics can be unidirectional by running
fibres or perpendicular using woven fibres. Resin plays a double role in these
applications.
Protecting layers:
Protecting layers can be applied for aesthetic reasons such as sand layer.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
48
editor@iaeme.com
Dimensions of test piece are measured at 3 different places along its height/length to
determine the average c/s area.
Ends of the specimen should be plane. For that the ends are tested on a bearing plate.
The specimen is placed centrally between the two compressions plates, such that the
centre of moving head is vertically above the centre of specimen.
Load is applied on the specimen by moving the movable head.
The load and the corresponding contraction are measured at different intervals.
Load is applied until the specimen fails.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
49
editor@iaeme.com
Draw diametrical lines on two ends of the specimen so that they are in the same axial
plane.
Determine the diameter and length of specimen.
Place the specimen on the universal testing machine as shown in figure.
Apply the load without shock and increase it continuously until nogreater load can be
sustained. Record the maximum load applied to specimen.
Note the appearance of concrete and any unusual feature in the type of failure.
Flexural Test
Measure the width and thickness of the specimen including the span length for the
calculation of the stress and elastic modulus. Mark on the locations where the load
will be applied under three-point bending.
Bend testing is carried out using a universal testing machine until failure takes place.
Construct the load-extension or load-deflection curve if the dial gauge is used.
Calculate the bend strength, yield strength and elastic modulus of the specimen
Describe the failure under bending
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
50
editor@iaeme.com
Cube 1
Cube 2
Cube 3
c/s Area
mm2
22500
22500
22500
MaxForce KN
Max. Displacement
880.5
811.4
860.4
7.80 mm
6.40 mm
7.60 mm
Compressive strength
KN/mm2
0.039
0.036
0.038
Cube 1
c/s Area
mm2
22500
Maximum Force
KN
915.90
Maximum
Displacement
3.40 mm
Compressive
strength KN/mm2
0.041
Cube 2
22500
921.70
3.50 mm
0.040
Cube 3
22500
912.30
3.10 mm
0.040
17678.5
Max. Force
KN
418.8
Max.
Displacement
7.80 mm
Compressive
strength
KN/mm2
0.024
Circular
column
c/s Area
mm2
Max. Force
KN
Max.
Displacement
Compressive
strength KN/mm2
17678.5
921.750
5.60 mm
0.052
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
51
editor@iaeme.com
The tensile strength of column was increased by about 55% after carbon fiber
lamination. The load carrying capacity of unlamented column was only 418.8 KN
whereas load carrying capacity of laminated column was 921.75 KN which is much
greater then unlamented column. The decrease in maximum displacement of
laminated column is about 28% than that of unlamented columns.
The failure pattern is as shown in figure below. The laminated column is still
serviceable at the maximum force given to it.
Flexural Test
This test was done on beam of dimensions 15cm x 15cm x 70cm.In this test two
beams of carbon fiber lamination and two beams without lamination was tested on
universal testing machine. The table below shows the obtained results;
Table 7 Test results of Beam before lamination
Beam 1
Beam 2
c/s Area
mm2
Maximum
Force KN
Maximum
Displacement
22500
22500
26.85
29.70
1.00 mm
1.20 mm
Compressive
strength
KN/mm2
0.0011
0.0013
Beam 1
Beam 2
c/s Area
mm2
22500
22500
Maximum
Force KN
59.3
52.5
Maximum
Displacement
1.05 mm
1.10 mm
Compressive
strength KN/mm2
0.0026
0.0023
The flexural strength of beam was increased by 55% after carbon fiber lamination.
The load carrying capacity of unlamented column was only 28.75KN whereas load
carrying capacity of laminated column was 55.9KN which is much greater then
unlamented column.
The carbon fiber laminated beam was not failed at its given load but the maximum
displacement was nearly same as unlamented beam at load greater than 2 times.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
52
editor@iaeme.com
Description of Items
Unit
Qty.
Om shanti enterprises
Rate
Amount
PER/
NOS
132
475
62700
PER/
NOS
24
875
21000
KG
2250
120
270000
SQM
15
1000
15000
SQM
16
350
5600
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
Rs 374300 /-
53
editor@iaeme.com
Description of Items
Erection of scaffolding
Breaking of column surface
using Chipper machine
Applying polymer skim
coat
2
3
UNIT
QTY
ARYABHATT ENTERPRISES
RATE
AMOUNT
500
500
SQM
12
550
6600
SQM
12
750
9000
12
4000
48000
435
12
700
8400
LUMP.
SQM
PER NOS
Sand sprinkling
SQM
TOTAL AMOUNT
Rs. 72500 /-
Therefore, the cost involved for carbon fiber wrapping is only 20 to 25 % that of
using steel jacketing.
6. CONCLUSION
The compressive strength of the carbon fiber wrap is 8% more as compared to
unlamented cubes. The tensile strength of carbon fiber wrap to column is 55% more
as compared to unlamented column. The flexural strength of carbon fiber wrap made
to beam is 55% more as compared to unlamented beam.
The carbon fiber wraps increases tensile and flexural strength then that of
compressive strength.
The maximum displacement of carbon fiber wrap is about 30 to 50 % less than
that of unlamented concrete cube, column and beam.
The use of carbon fiber wrap saves 70 to 75 % cost associated with using steel
jacketing.
Further investigation should be carried out to check the use of carbon fiber as
partial replacement for steel.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
54
editor@iaeme.com
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
55
editor@iaeme.com