Professional Documents
Culture Documents
69
16. That night they came back to their father in tears,
They came to their father, and then a particular time and state is mentioned.
They came at the time of Isha. It is the time when the glow in the sky that is left after the sun has left the
horizon disappears, or begins to disappear. Meaning, it is very dark now. They chose that time to come back to
their dad.
And when they did, yabkoon. They came back crying. Are these real tears? They were fake tears. For some
people, when they read this, if it hadnt been for movies, people may not know its not possible for someone to
make themselves cry about something thats not even true. Otherwise one would be surprised here that fake
crying was possible.
There is a word choice here that is used, wa jaau. They came. As opposed to saying ata. Jaa has some
connotation of coming with some hardship, some obstacle. As for ata, it is like coming with ease.
Meaning the conquest of Makkah, the help of Allah came after 13 years of struggle in Makkah and 8 years of
war in Madinah. It came after many struggles.
The amr of Allah came, the day of resurrection and everything that will take place. For Allah, it is effortless to
make all that happen.
So here, they came with heavy hearts. They did something terrible, horrible. It was difficult upon them. They
came to their father, at that time and they were crying false tears.
Incidentally, in Arabic there is a word in Arabic for fake crying. It called tabki (real) and tabaaki (fake). One
refers to real tears and the other to fake. The word used here is for real tears but actually they were crying fake
tears.
Like there is a word for fake tawakkul. Tawakkul means real conviction of the heart and relying on something.
Tawaakul is fake tawakkul.
The question here is, what is the significance of being told that they came at night time? Of all the details that
happened, the focus is on the time they came to their father. Why this time? Why not day time?
Hide their faces which may give away their deceit [al-Biq_ & al-Baghawi]
It is difficult to read the faces at night time. They are guilty. They are going to come and tell their dad, we had
nothing to with it, a wolf ate this. Their faces might give them away. They come at night time to hide their facial
expressions, and also, their eyes can be read. At night, the face and eyes are obscured to make it difficult to
read.
70
They waited till night time as night time is easier for crime
In the cover of night, it is easier to do crime and sin. There are less people around. But more importantly, night
time brings with itself this type of feelings. Human beings feel more inclined to wrong things. The way people
drive at night is also more reckless. More crimes happen at night.
My Reflections
71
17. saying, Father, we went out to run a race and left Yusuf together with our things
and then a wolf appeared and ate him up but you are never going to believe us now,
not even though we really tell the truth.
Now they are going to start explaining themselves to dad. They are already crying. Dads already seen them
and he is thinking what is going on here? First of all, look how late theyve come. Secondly, they are all crying.
Where is Yusuf over there?
Then they say, o our father, indeed we went, then we began to have a competition. Some scholars say they
were racing, others say they were practicing archery. We left Yusuf with our belongings. The thing that you
feared would happen, exactly that happened! Again, not zib, az-zib. The wolf! This is not very intelligent.
There are so many indications that they are lying.
Before they even let dad speak, they say, you are not going to believe us even if we were telling the truth.
There are many indications that something is fishy.
My Reflections
72
18. They then produced his shirt with false blood on it. He said, It is merely that your
lower selves have suggested something to you which you did; but beauty lies in
showing steadfastness. It is Allah alone who is my Help in face of the event that you
describe.
Before dad even gets a chance to address them, they say something else.
73
which issue?
He said this matter. What matter? He makes it ambiguous because he doesnt now what it is, but whatever it is,
this is the case regarding it.
The other thing is, there is an interesting linguistic point here as well. He doesnt say al-amra. He uses the nakira
form, amra, which gives the extra tatheem, it is like an exclamation mark at the end.
He is really feeling the pain.
Thats all he says to his sons. What he says next, he says to himself and to Allah .
Next he says, and so, a beautiful sabr, that is what it will be for me now. And sabrun jameel is not a complete
sentence. The complete sentence would be fa sabree, sabrun jameel. But when you are very emotional, you
cant really complete your sentences. Yaqoob is really feeling the trauma. All he can say is sabrun
jameel.
What is sabrun jameel?
First of all, it is to exercise patience. He is going to exercise patience now. But also, I am going to make it
beautiful. Its the perfection of sabr. And that is no complaining, no whining, no moaning. But at the end of the
story, he says, I complain of my sadness to Allah.
So Ibn Taymiyyah
says, the sabrun jameel is when someone refuses to complain to anyone else except
Allah. So he vents his sadness, grief and sorrow to Allah. And if somebody was to do that, it doesnt negate
having sabrun jameel.
two meanings
The last statement of Yaqoob is wallahu al mustaaan. Istiana is to seek help. Who is he going to seek
help from? Allah .
Mustaaan is the one whom you seek help from. Whom is Yaqoob going to seek help from? Allah.
Regarding what exactly? There are 2 opinions:
1.
2.
Maqdoor, this is what Allah decreed and there is nothing you can do about it except sabr.
Mahzoor, sabr in staying away from things that are haram.
Sabr in fulfilling religious obligations.
74
The question is this. Even though there was nothing Yaqoob could have done physically, he did do
something inwardly. Inwardly, what he did was that his heart was actively seeking the help of Allah
. Based on that, we can say that the actions of the heart are far greater in number than the actions of the
limbs. How so?
Wallahu al-mustaaan. The act of seeking help from Allah is an action of the heart. The heart is acting, it is
exercising, hoping and seeking help from Allah. The mouth is doing nothing. The hands are doing nothing. And
the thing is, in this situation, the road for action of the hands has come to an end. When the end of the road
came for the actions of the tongue and limbs, the road for the actions of the heart continued on.
He couldnt do ibadah from limbs but he had sabr with his heart and his heart was actively seeking Allahs help.
This shows that ibadah comes from the limbs and the heart, and both of them are connected many times, but
sometimes, the limbs come to the end of the road.
Just like a person who is paralysed, he cant do anything neck down. What does that mean? No good deeds for
him? No, the heart can be doing more ibadah than the limbs. We need to worship Allah with our hearts as well
as our limbs.
75
76
Major Lesson
[Sahih al-Bukhri]
The real as-sabr comes at the first strike. When the calamity strikes, that is when the person has to exercise
patience with Allah and with the calamity that He has decreed for him. And that is exactly what
Yaqoob did.
Proofs from
the salaf
Using this
verse
Criticism of
methodology
Conclusion
Hypothetical
scenario
Crucial
difference in
lingustic
meaning
77
This is a little complicated. The words of the brothers, when they said to their father, and you will not have
eeman in us. Regarding this verse, Ibn Taymiyyah spoke a great deal. It was regarding the heretical view as to
how eemaan is defined. According to one heretical view, eemaan is defined as merely tasdeeq (affirmation of
the heart or affirmation of the heart and the tongue). That means if someone says I am a Muslim, and also
affirms it with his heart, this is the definition of eeman, he is a mumin. That heretical view is based on 2 things:
1.
2.
Ibn Taymiyyah said this is not true, this is not accurate to say that the definition of eeman is just affirm with
ones tongue and heart.
What is the definition of eeman? According to early Muslims, it is the statement and actions of the heart and
body. The statement and action of the heart means the heart professes an inward belief and acts as well.
Acting includes the action of having tawakkul in Allah, loving Allah, fearing Allah, etc. Qawl and amal of the
heart and of the body. The statement that comes from the tongue and then the body begins to perform acts of
worship which testify to the persons eeman.
According to the heretical view, Shaytan could be said to be a mumin. He said, O my Lord, give me some time
until we are resurrected. He spoke to Allah, affirmed that He was his rabb. So he believes in Allah, but we know
the reality if different. So this cannot be the definition.
Now the analysis of Ibn Taymiyyah.
1.
There is a falsity of reasoning here. Look at the argument they use. They are speaking of defining the
most important thing with regards to Islam, which is eemaan. With regards to eemaan, eemaan and its
derivatives are of the words mentioned most often in Quran and on the tongue of the prophet .
So this word is scattered all over the Quran and in hadith, but, although it is so significant and
mentioned in so many places, why only go to this place? This surah is not even memorized by many
people. In terms of an academic way of coming to a conclusion, this is not very strong as one is
supposed to survey all of the evidences. This is a shortcoming in the methodology,
2.
Once you come up with a definition, the definition should work anywhere that that word is mentioned
in the Quran or sunnah. Islam is a complete deen. No one thing in Islam or the shariah contradicts
another part. So here, you should be able to fit this conclusion in anywhere that is it referenced or
mentioned in Islam. But it doesnt.
3.
Now, Ibn Taymiyyah brings a hypothetical scenario. He says, a man could come to the Prophet
and say, I believe in what you say. I believe that you are the messenger of Allah, and I believe Allah I
the only one who should be worshipped. But, I am not going to pray, I am not going to fast, I am not
going to do hajj, in fact, I am going to join the army that is going to attack you. Do you think the
prophet is going to give him baya and affirm his eemaan? Would anyone in their right mind say he
is Muslim? No. But technically, according to the definition provided, it seems that he is Muslim.
This is a very powerful way of discussing this issue. This is a huge controversy and continues until present
times. Just say to the person who says eemaan is just believing with the heart and the tongue, that I want you
to imagine your next door neighbour, you lived your whole life next door to him. He never said that he is a
78
My Reflections
79