Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2319-1163
Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, C.K.Pithawalla College of Engineering and Technology,
Gujarat, India, 4 Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, S.V.National Institute of Technology, Gujarat, India
1
samip_mech@yahoo.com, 2gaurang_chaudhari2005@yahoo.com, 3casanovicdigs@hotmail.com, 4sac@med.svnit.ac.in
Abstract
Before attempting to the design of radial inflow turbine, some of the techniques used to describe and present the effect of coefficient
on geometry, need to be appreciated. The user of turbine will generally require parameters which readily describe the overall
dimension of the machine so that assessments and comparisons can be easily made. The designer requires parameters which will
enable him to select the correct machine and make valid comparisons between competing designs. This allows the designer to
compute more easily the dimension of the machine at different coefficient, to assess the performance of a range of geometrically
similar machines. A paper describes the basic design parameters and effect of coefficient on radial inflow turbine impeller geometry
for 25kW application.
W
U 2C 2 U 3C 3
m
1
U 2 2 U 32 Cw2 2 Cw32 C2 2 C32
Where subscripts 2 and 3 here denote the rotor inlet and exit
planes respectively. Each of three terms in equation makes a
contribution to the specific work output. For radial inflow
turbine the first term is positive. It also demonstrates why a
radial inflow is preferred to a radial outflow machine. For the
second term to be positive, CW3 must be greater than CW2,
that is to say the rotor should be designed so that the flow
relative to the rotor accelerates through the blade passage. The
third term is the reverse of the second, and demonstrates the
need to maximize the difference between the absolute
velocities at inlet C2 and outlet C3.
In general the aim is to keep the flow velocities as low a
reasonably possible, since many losses including friction and
exit kinetic energy increase as the square of velocity. The
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
98
ISSN: 2319-1163
1.013bar
288 K
Compression ratio
Compressor efficiency
Compression index of air
Specific heat of air
Pressure drop in combustion
chamber
Turbine efficiency
Expansion index of gas
Specific heat of gas
3
75 %
1.4
1.005 kJ/Kg k
6%
75%
1.302
1.315 kJ/Kg k
2.83 bar
1200 K
1.1 bar
1023.75 K
0.1028 Kg/s
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
99
ISSN: 2319-1163
Sw
h
T
PT
1 03 1 03
m * h01
h01
T01
h C
C
20 2 r 3
U2
U2
U2
r
r3 S
r2 is the rotor radius ratio. The exit swirl is
Where,
normally fairly small, so that the second term on the right
hand side can be neglected from which U2 can be found out.
The flow coefficient is defined in terms of the exit meridional
velocity, also non- dimensionalized by the inlet blade speed,
Cm 2
U2
Cm 2 *U 2
C2 C 2 2 Cm 2 2
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
100
ISSN: 2319-1163
C 2
Cm 2
Cw2 Cm2 2 (U 2 C 2 )2
2 tan 1
2 tan 1
Mu
U 2 C 2
Cm 2
U2
a01
11
The static temperature and pressure at the inlet to the rotor are
C2
T2 T02 2
2* CP
T
P2 P02 2
T02
12
n 1
n
13
A2 2* * r2 * b2
14
Cm 2
Cm3 .
m Cm 2 * A2 *
p2
R * T2
15
r3s
1 cos 2
WR * sin3 *
r2
1 cos 2
16
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
101
M R 3s
ISSN: 2319-1163
Cw 3 s
n * R * T3
17
C2
T3 T03 3
2* CP
18
T
P3 P03 * 3
T03
n
n 1
ZB
* 110 2 * tan 2
30
20
Solidity is defined as
sd 2
ZB
21
Above equation has been solved for the different range of flow
coefficient and loading coefficient found in literature.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
102
ISSN: 2319-1163
CONCLUSIONS
Figure 8 Impeller Hub Radius vs Impeller Speed
The figure 7 shows that by increasing the value of flow
coefficient and loading coefficient the value of shroud radius
decreases. This is because the value of impeller shroud radius
is proportional to inlet flow angle i.e. 2 (equation 16). As the
value of flow coefficient and loding coefficient increases the
value of 2 decreases which leads to decrease the impeller
shroud radius.
By increasing the value of flow coefficient and loading
coefficient the value of hub radius decreases as the hub radius
is directly proportional to the impeller shroud radius (Figure
8).
2.
3.
4.
5.
NOMENCLATURE
A
a
b
C
Cp
Cs
CV
d
h
L
M
m
N
P
Rg
Re
r
r3S/r2
SW
S
Area
Speed of sound
Blade width
absolute velocity
Specific heat at constant pressure
Isentropic velocity (Spouting velocity)
Specific heat at constant volume
Diameter of rotor
enthalpy
Passage length
Mach number
mass flow rate
Speed of rotation
Pressure
Gas constant
Reynolds number
Rotor radius
Radius ratio
Non dimensional power ratio
Solidity, Swirl co efficient
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
103
Temperature
Blade speed
Relative velocity
Relative velocity ratio
Axial length
Number of blades
Absolute flow angle
Relative flow angle
Specific heat ratio
Efficiency
Density
Flow coefficient
Blade loading coefficient
Meridional velocity ratio
Exducer hub to shroud ratio
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
ISSN: 2319-1163
SUBSCRIPTS
0
1
2
3
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 02 | Feb-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
104