Skdjfb;lasikdf

Zxmnc Mjbkll/ksdf
Xcmb ZXMc S><D.;sdmsd;
Z<jb,sjf smc ,x c,

S fn sdlknf;ds,s,;ms;f,s/lfm/dfXc
;x,vl
Dn xc,vnkdmvlmv
Mxn mn v

Taore gives feminism a meaning of his own; he provides his leads to

find themselves in the face of society without hurting others. In Gora we see
Tagores philophy that if the sadhvsfd lkjsdas
;d;skmdwfsljcbksdhb

educational approach is right and imaginative and if there be a spirit

like Tagore to inspire and guide, there is no hsdjseight that the individual
may not reach. UnderRabindranath Tagore is considered the apostle of the
Bengal Renaissance. Born in 1861, he was a prodigiouZXgcass mind since
childhood and by the turn of the century had become a household name in
Bengal as a poet, a song writer, a playwright, an essayist, a short story writer
and a novelist.
Poreshbabus guidance, we see both Sucharita and Lalita emerge
through their struggles to become, in addition to a domestic being, an
independent intellectual being.Tagore introduces Sucharidskyta, a central
female character as a symbol of nature, and as the novel progresses, slowly
but imperceptibly.He transforms this symbol into a form and figure, and
provides her with a very independent and individual mind. The aggressive
Gora is offset against the quieter and more humane Sucharita, a symbol of
female power, who herself can bring a man to his knees and change the

society with her innocent charm. Then there is the free spirited Lalita, who is
not shy of revolting against her own family and society, for following her
hearts desires and true calling. Goras idea of womanhood is extremely
stereotypical and is prevalent until this day. The Mother is the highest
pedestal offered to a woman under such scheme. The Feminine Individual
is not given the individual status. The Indian woman could dvksgdfsdfkugsdf
the ideology of placing women at a Mothers mantle, yet he forgets to pay
his respects to a woman, Lachmiya who mothered him along with
Anandamoyi. As the narrator notes, The statement of a concept no longer
has the same certainty when applied to a person. We see Tagores vision of
Bharatvarsha in the noble hearted, all-forgiving, liberal minded Hindu
mother, Anandamoyi. She was much ahead of snhdvher time and society in
understanding the spirit of humanism in the Hindu way of life, in which there
had been a liberal streak, always trying to assimilate other ways of living,
thinking and relating. She conducted herself as one who desired to enhance
and enrich our growth as human beings, without which religions, societies,
customs, ideologies with all progressive or reactionary ideas can become
a terrible bondage.
Most of Tagores women protagonists exhibit the womans intellectual
dilemma. Literature is the key to liberation and the protagonist is consumed
by a longing for literacy and for books.Sucharita, in Gora, resorted to
reading whenever she felt restless oThrough this essay I am exploring
Tagorespowerfully convincing women characters, him being one of the
earliest to describe them in such exquisite social and psychological detail.
Throughout human history, the woman has been portrayed as a symbol of
fertility, a Goddess representing the Motherland, or even as a class of people
whose best place is in the kitchen and within the house. The woman was
never viewed as an individual but she is always represented in opposite
extremes only. iIn the then patriarchal Bengali society, Tagore did something
unheard of before. He reconstructed the traditional stereotypical feminine
figure in his works.This reveals the vast and humane philosophy that lies at
the base of Tagores writing. As Humayun Kabir has stated, Rabindranath
remained fervently committed to a universal humanism and the individuals
freedom to choose his own way of serving the cause of social and political
emancipation.iiI will also try to draw a comparison between the women
characters in Bankims novels and those in Tagores.
r disturbed. In A Wifes Letter Mrinalini finds in the writing of poetry a
refuge from her in-laws petty persecution and their jealousy of her superior
education. The accuracy of Tagores descriptions of these heroines and their

struggles is the fruit of long years of observing the consequences of Indias

failure to make use of her womens talents.
Another noteworthy observation is that it is always a man, or a social
situation that ratifies male domination of home and community, which is
seen precipitating or perpetuating intolerable situations. The man is always a
destroyer (esp. in Chokher Bali, Mahendra creates a lot of trouble in his
household all because of his spoiled and self centered nature), but seldom
destroys out of malevolence or sheer wickedness; he does so as the result of
a mode of behavior that is expected, or that he thinks, by the men (and
sometimes by the women as well) around him. Sometimes out of sheer
pompous stupidity, vanity, triviality men destroy the hopes for a new life of
their women. The husband of Mrinalini, the wife of A Wifes Letter,
diminishes her respect for him by sheer callousness with which he takes her
for granted and by his obliviousness to both the cruelties of his relatives and
to what poetry means to her. The weakness and obtuseness of Tagores male
characters, in contrast to such women, has been frequently commented
upon; what makes the men in these stories so hard to forgive, whether they
act from admirable or despicable motives, is their mindlessness. They
behave like automations, plugged into a social system that they do not
question until, having ignored the first faint signals of something short
circuited in their relations with the women in their lives, they receive a really
severe jolt, the reason for which they seldom understand and frequently do
not try to analyze.Tagore does not go out of his way to castigate these men.
His dismissal of them, his leaving them, so to speak, where they fall is more
eloquent than any authorial tirade. However, everything comes to a
concluding, socially right end.
On the other hand we have Bankim Chandra who used the other
extreme philosophy for women. Bankim Chandra Chatterji was the greatest
figure of the second phase of the Bengal Renaissance. This was just after the
first wave of the new movement had spent itself and when Bengal did not
merely look beyond the seas to the Western science and Philosophy, but also
look back to her own past heritage.He portrayed the country as his Mother
andsome of his characters defied the stereotype for femininity prevailing in
those days. Devi Chaudhurani, provides a key insight into Chatterjis vision of
Indian womanhood, a vision that plays with the ideals of egalitarianism and
Hinduism.iii
In Anandamath, the Mother conceived by him engendered the nation
and she was made the poetic symbol of Bande Materam. Perhaps the most

evocative scene in the novel takes place when Mahendra is taken to the
hideout temple in the forest. Within this structure, Mahendra is shown
several different iconic images of India. Mahendra is puzzled at the
marvelous form of a female figure lying on Vishnus lap. He goes on to
another room where he sees a richly ornamented image of jagaddhtr, or
protectress of the world, also identified as mother of the Indian nation, as
she was in the past. Following this vision, Mahendra is taken to a room
housing the goddess of destruction, Kali, naked and garlanded with skulls,
mother of the nation as she is then portrayed to be. The mother has
assumed this malefic form given the ravaged nature of the country, which
currently resembles a burial ground. After this frightening vision of the
present, Mahendra visits a beautiful ten-armed golden goddess (Durga),
placed in the middle of a marble temple. This is what the mother will become
when the country is restored to its original grandeur. With Shantis character,
Bankim defies the then prevalent stereotype of wifehood and domesticity.
Circumstances in Shantis life cause her to be educated in Sanskrit, roam the
forests in the garb of a sannyasiand later train in marshal arts, she is selfsufficient, independent and capable of defendingherself. The ease with which
Shanti unhorses the English Lindley and rides away on his horse could put
any modern feminist to shame. Shanti decides to perform her wife's role by
the side of her ascetic husband Jibananda by donning the male Sannyasi's
disguise and fighting by his side. Shanti is left free to contribute her full
strength to the heroic life of her sannyasi husband.
To sum up the main argument, it must be noted that Tagore had a
unique understanding of feminism, and was decades ahead of his time, as he
was in his views on education, politics, and agricultural economy. By painting
the stereotypical image of the woman, Tagore effectively highlighted the ill
effects of the society and how the women learnt to cope with it. Feminism at
an accelerated pace only annoyed the people of India then. The sudden
outcry for freedom and dissolution of woman from Hindu society would get
them very little real progress. Tagore is largely responsible for the growth of
a humane outlook in India. He believed that, only through the gradual
percolation of education and social freedom, would the women of India would
find their place in society.

Works Cited
Mary M Logo. :Tagores Liberated Women, Asian Studies Center, Michigan
State University, 17/03/2013
Christine Garlough (2007): Transfiguring Criminality: Eclectic
Representationsof a Female Bandit in Indian Nationalist and Feminist
Rhetoric, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 93:3,253-278, 12/04/2013
Jasodhara Bagchi :Positivism and Nationalism: Womanhood and Crisis in
Nationalist Fiction Bankimchandra'sAnandmath, Economic and Political
Weekly, Vol. 20, No. 43 (Oct. 26, 1985), pp. WS58-WS62, 12/04/2013
Humayun Kabir: Mysticism and Humanity of Tagore, Istituto Italiano per
l'Africa e l'Oriente (IsIAO), 17/03/2013
Rajarshi Singh: The Feminine Individual in Tagores Gora, Web, 17/03/2013
Gender and Nationalism in Tagores Home and the World, Author: Indrani
Mitra, Modern Fiction Studies 41.2 (1995) 243-264
The Runaway and Other Stories by Tagore, Review by Massimo Scaligero
Gora, Trans: Radha Chakravarty, 2009, Penguin Books India, 2011
Home and the World, Trans: Sreejata Guha, 2005, Penguin Books India, 2011

Foot-Notes

i Quoted by Rajarshi Singh in his essay: The Feminine Individual in Tagores Gora, Web,
17/03/2013
ii See the paper by Humayun Kabir: Mysticism and Humanity of Tagore, Istituto Italiano
per l'Africa e l'Oriente (IsIAO), 17/03/2013
iii Christine Garlough (2007): Transfiguring Criminality: Eclectic Representations of a
Female Bandit in Indian Nationalist and Feminist Rhetoric