Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEY WORDS
Growth, adolescent development, growth
potential, athlete, nutrition, gymnastics, wrestling, nutritional
dwarfism, athletic training
INTRODUCTION
A childs growth can be compared with that of his or her peers
by referring to the norm on an appropriate growth chart. More
important, the longitudinal measurements of a childs growth are
a dynamic statement of his or her general condition or health.
Tanner (1) has proposed that children be measured accurately
to identify individuals or groups of individuals within a community who require special care, to identify illnesses that influence
growth, or to determine an ill childs response to therapy. The
linear growth of a child-adolescent athlete may also reflect the adequacy of energy intake for a particular training regimen. Measurement of growth may also be used as an index of the general
health and nutrition of a population or subpopulation of children.
GROWTH MEASUREMENTS
The growth of children should be measured periodically and
accurately. Two common devices are adequate for such measurements and were described by Rogol and Lawton (2).
Neonates and infants
Small inaccuracies in length measurement can easily affect a
childs percentiles on growth curve charts. Infants should be
placed with the top of the head against the fixed headboard of the
measurement device and with the eye-ear plane perpendicular to
the base of the device (Figure 1). The childs knees must be flat
against the table and the footboard moved until the soles of the
feet are against it, with the toes pointing up.
Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(suppl):521S8S. Printed in USA. 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition
521S
ABSTRACT
The longitudinal growth of an individual child
is a dynamic statement of the general health of that child. Measurements should be performed often and accurately to detect
alterations from physiologic growth. Although any single point
on the growth chart is not very informative, when several growth
points are plotted over time, it should become apparent whether
that individuals growth is average, a variant of the norm, or
pathologic. Somatic growth and maturation are influenced by
several factors that act independently or in concert to modify an
individuals genetic growth potential. Linear growth within the
first 2 y of life generally decelerates but then remains relatively
constant throughout childhood until the onset of the pubertal
growth spurt. Because of the wide variation among individuals in
the timing of the pubertal growth spurt, there is a wide range of
physiologic variations in normal growth. Nutritional status and
heavy exercise training are only 2 of the major influences on the
linear growth of children. In the United States, nutritional
deficits result from self-induced restriction of energy intake.
That single factor, added to the marked energy expenditure of
training and competition for some sports, and in concert with
the self-selection of certain body types, makes it difficult to
identify the individual factors responsible for the slow linear
growth of some adolescent athletes, for example, those who partake in gymnastics, dance, or wrestling.
Am J Clin Nutr
2000;72(suppl):521S8S.
522S
ROGOL ET AL
parameters within a population and are often codified into a
series of growth charts. The following discussion emphasizes the
genetic, nutritional, hormonal, and physical activity factors that
might alter the growth process.
Growth assessment
Linear growth and physical maturation are dynamic processes
encompassing molecular, cellular, somatic, and organismal
changes. Traditionally, stature has been primarily used for growth
assessment, but changes in body proportion and composition are
also essential elements of growth, especially of maturation.
Growth standards have been derived for several populations and
523S
524S
ROGOL ET AL
VARIATIONS OF NORMAL GROWTH
Normal variants of growth were found in 82% of children whose
height decreased at the third percentile (2 SD) but in only 50% of
those whose height decreased at the first percentile (3 SD) of the
mean for age (20). Assessment of skeletal maturation is perhaps the
best indicator of biological age or maturity status, because its development spans the entire period of growth. Several methods exist for
determining the former (2123). Each uses a single radiograph of
the left hand and wrist and makes comparisons with children of normal stature by using an atlas and scoring system. Because girls are
more developmentally mature than boys at any given chronologic
age, separate standards exist for females and males.
Familial short stature
On average, children of smaller parents will eventually attain
lesser height than children of taller parents. Because bone age
approximates chronologic age, these children usually grow at an
appropriate rate during childhood and attain sexual maturation and
pubertal growth spurt at the usual ages.
Constitutional delay of growth
A constitutional growth delay is considered to be a delay in
the tempo of growth. In this case, each calendar year is not
accompanied by a full year of growth and skeletal development,
so the individual requires more time to complete the growth
process. Most of these children will eventually have delayed
adolescence as well as delayed attainment of adult stature. Birth
history and birth length are generally normal, but the growth pattern shifts downward to the lower percentiles, so that the lowest
values for growth velocity are obtained at 35 y of age. Thereafter, this pattern is characterized by steady progression of
growth. Because the bone age does not advance 1 y for each calendar year, it progressively deviates from the chronologic age.
The height age is usually approximately the same as the bone
age, and if true, the mature height will be well within the normal
range for the appropriate population. Like familial short stature,
this pattern is often familial, and because both are relatively
common, some children will have elements of both.
525S
FIGURE 3. Growth pattern of nutritional dwarfing (A and B) compared with constitutional growth delay (C). A: Patient in whom body weight gain
and height progression decreased after 10 y of age. Extrapolated weight after age 14 y revealed a body weight deficit based on the previous growth percentile. However, there was no body weight deficit for height; with nutritional rehabilitation, there was recovery in weight gain and catch-up growth. B:
Patient with body weight deficit for height but a more marked deficit for theoretical weight. C: Patient without nutritional dwarfing. This patient, with
constitutional growth delay, showed a body weight gain consistently along the lower percentile, with no deviation in growth. Note that there was no body
weight deficit for height or for theoretical weight based on previous growth. Reprinted from reference 26, page 105, by courtesy of Marcel Dekker, Inc.
526S
ROGOL ET AL
SUMMARY
A few compelling data implicate training or competition as
causal in the shorter stature and decreased body mass of some
pubertal athletes in specific sports. It appears likely that activities
such as gymnastics and dance in girls or wrestling in boys select
for those participants with desirable genetic anthropometric traits.
Added to this process are the interactions among diminished nutrition and the energy drain of training. Preliminary hormonal studies cannot distinguish between constitutionally delayed puberty
and a syndrome caused by sport participation. However, studies
designed to make this distinction probably cannot be done in adolescents. Investigations in adult women show that some amenorrheic athletes have altered pulsatile gonadotropin release, but it
has not yet been possible to separate the effect of the training itself
from nutritional and stress factors (48).
REFERENCES
1. Tanner JM. Auxology. In: Kappy MS, Blizzard RM, Migeon CJ,
eds. The diagnosis and treatment of endocrine disorders in childhood and adolescence. 4th ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas,
1995:13792.
2. Rogol AD, Lawton EL. Body measurements. In: Lohr JA, ed. Pediatric outpatient procedures. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1990:19.
3. Baumgartner RN, Roche AF, Himes JH. Incremental growth tables:
supplementary to previously published charts. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;
43:71122.
4. Tanner JM. Fetus into man: physical growth from conception to
maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
5. Sinclair D. Human growth after birth. London: Oxford University
Press, 1978.
6. Smith DW. Growth and its disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
1977.
7. Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Lockhart RD, et al. Aberdeen Growth Study,
I: the prediction of adult body measurement from measurements
taken each year from birth to five years. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:372.
8. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in patterns of pubertal changes
in girls. Arch Dis Child 1969;44:291303.
9. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in patterns of pubertal changes
in boys. Arch Dis Child 1970;45:1323.
10. Berkey CS, Wang X, Dockery DW, Ferris B. Adolescent height
growth of US children. Ann Hum Biol 1994;21:43542.
527S
528S
ROGOL ET AL
29. Theintz GE, Howald H, Weiss U, Sizonenko PC. Evidence for a
reduction of growth potential in adolescent female gymnasts. J Pediatr 1993;122:30613.
30. Theintz GE. Endocrine adaption to intensive physical training during growth. Clin Endocrinol 1994;41:26772.
31. Constantini NW, Warren MP. Menstrual dysfunction in swimmers; a
distinct entity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:27404.
32. Lindholm C, Hagenfeldt K, Ringertz BM. Pubertal development in
elite juvenile gymnasts: effects of physical training. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 1994:73:26973.
33. Bernadot D, Czerwinski C. Selected body composition and growth
measures of junior elite gymnasts. J Am Diet Assoc 1991;91:2933.
34. Claessens AL, Malina RM, Lefevre J, et al. Growth and menarcheal
status of elite female gymnasts. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:
75563.
35. Baxter-Jones ADG, Helms P, Baines-Preece J, Preece M. Menarche
in intensively trained gymnasts, swimmers and tennis players. Ann
Hum Biol 1994;21:40715.
36. Nutter J. Seasonal changes in female athletes diets. Int J Sports
Nutr 1991;1:395407.
37. Warren MP. The effects of exercise on pubertal progression and reproductive function in girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;51:11507.
38. Bonen A. Recreational exercise does not impair menstrual cycles: a
prospective study. Int J Sports Med 1992;13:11020.
39. Louis O, Demeirleir K, Kalender W, et al. Low vertebral bone density values in young non-elite female runners. Int J Sports Med
1991;12:2147.
40. Roemmich JN, Rogol AD. Physiology of growth and development:
its relationship to performance in the young athlete. Clin Sports
Med 1995;14:483502.
41. Seefeldt V, Haubenstricker J, Branta CF, Evans S. Physical characteristics of adult distance runners. In: Brown EW, Branta CF, eds.
Competitive sports for children and youth. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics, 1988:24758.
42. Steen SN, Brownell KD. Patterns of weight loss and regain in
wrestlers: has the tradition changed? Med Sci Sports Exerc
1990;22:7628.
43. Williams MH. Exercise effects on childrens health. Gatorade Sport
Science Institute. Sports Science Exchange 1993;4(3).
44. Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Stout J, Housh DJ. Anthropometric growth
patterns of high school wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25:
114151.
45. Roemmich JN, Sinning WE. Sport-seasonal changes in body composition, growth, power and strength of adolescent wrestlers. Int J
Sports Med 1996;17:929.
46. Hughes RA, Housh TJ, Johnson GO. Anthropometric estimations of
body composition in wrestlers across a season. J Appl Sport Sci Res
1991;5:716.
47. Tipton CM, Tcheng TK. Iowa Wrestling Study: weight loss in high
school wrestlers. JAMA 1970;214:126974.
48. Loucks AB, Verdun M. Slow restoration of LH pulsatility by refeeding
in energetically disrupted women. Am J Physiol 1998;275:R121826.