Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Define Units
References
1) AWWA D100-11, IBC 2009 and ASCE 7-05
2) Basis of Seismic Provisions for welded Steel Oil Storage Tanks by Wozniak & Mitchell.
3) Steel Plate Engineering Data Vol. 1, Useful Information on the Design of Plate Structures,
Steel Tanks for Liquid Storage 1982, SPFA
4) Structural Engineering Handbook, by Gaylord, 3rd Edition Chapter 27, Steel Water Tanks,
by Bob Wozniak
5) ACI 318, Chapter 9 and AISC Manual of Steel Construction
cone roof
slope s =3/4":12"
height of tank
shell ="Hs"
ring wall
depth "Df"
D
2
G 1.0
R 16.5 ft
However, AWWA D100-11 minimum pressure for live load or snow load is 25 psf; therefore use:
LL 25 psf
2/28/2013
1 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Wind Loads:
Design wind load: from Drawing 003-S-0001
m
Vdes 42 93.951 mph
s
Vdes
mph
Cf .60
G' 1.0
93.951
I 1.15
Site Class, Sms and Sm1 values from project Geotech, Nason McCullough on 2-14-13:
Soil underneath tank is to be 'vibro-compacted soil':
Seismic parameters:
SMS 1.0
SM1 1.0
Site Class = D
IE 1.5
Design response spectra; U .67 scaling factor This U scaling factor value should be .67
for 5% dampening Refer to IBC and to the AWWA D100 STD and eq 16-39 and 16-40 of IBC
2009.
(Eqn. 13-7)
SDS U SMS
SDS 0.670
SD1 U SM1
SD1 0.670
(Eqn. 13-8)
A v 0.14 SDS
A v 0.094
Tc 2
3.68 h p
3.68 g tanh
D
Tc 3.318 s
SD1
SDS
Sai SDS
2/28/2013
Ts 1
Sai 0.67
Section 13.2.7.3.1
Section 13.2.9.2 Ground-supported flat-bottom tanks.
2 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Check above formulas for application of design response spectrum for convective component
Sac = design spectral response acceleration for the convective component, 0.5% damped, at the
first mode sloshing wave period TC stated as a multiple (decimal) of g
Tc 3.318 s
K 1.5
K SD1
Tc
TL 16 s
T c TL 1
sec 0.303
K SD1
Tc
K TL SD1
AWWA Eq 13-12
Tc
sec SDS 1
sec 1.461
AWWA Eq 13-13
"1" means
true
K SD1
min
sec SDS if Tc TL
Tc
K TL SD1
Tc
2/28/2013
sec otherwise
if Tc TL
otherwise
Sac 0.303
3 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Horizontal Design Accelerations; AWWA Section 13.2.9 for ground supported flat bottom tanks
section 13.2.9.2 : GENERAL PROCEDURE uses equations 13-9, 13-10, 13-11 and equations 13-12
and 13-13
Select Response Modification Factors:
Table 28 Response modification factors Ri and Rc
Response Modification Factor
Rc (convective component)
-
Structure
Ri (impulsive component)
Tank will be Ground supported, flat bottom, mechanically anchored: AWWA D100, Table 28:
Ri 3
Rc 1.5
A i
1.4 Ri
0.239
Sac IE
1.4 Rc
0.216
ss 19.33
Input Table: First column is the design shell thickness. Second column is to determine height of
tank. Third column is needed for Chapter 14 tank steel strengths if different strength steels are
used at different shell courses.
.3125
.3125
.375
tt
.375
.5
.5
2/28/2013
5 ss
8
8
8
8
8
0.313
ss
0.313
ss
0.375
ss 0.375
0.5
ss
0.5
ss
5 19.33
8 19.33
8 19.33
8 19.33
8 19.33
n rows ( tt)
n6
number of
shell courses
8 19.33
4 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
2
w submatrix tt 1 n 1 1 ft
1
t submatrix tt 1 n 1 1 in
Hs
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
w Hs 45 ft
Allow. Shell
Shell
Stress times
5.0
Stress, ksi
19.33
E, ksi
19.33
0.3125
8.0
19.33
19.33
0.375
8.0
19.33
19.33
0.375
8.0
19.33
19.33
0.5
8.0
19.33
19.33
0.5
8.0
19.33
19.33
Shell Course
Shell Thickness
Shell
(in)
Width (ft)
0.3125
(from top)
Shell
Shell
Course
Dynamic
Shell
Thick., in Shell
(from top)
Req'd
Static
Static
Thick., in.
Stress, ksi
Shell
Thick., in
Dynamic
Impulsive
Shell
Convective
Nc, lbs/in
Hydrostatic
Hoop Force,
Nh, lbs/in
0.31
0.19
2.28
0.02
3.30
131
132
429
0.31
0.19
5.93
0.06
7.57
280
54
1115
0.38
0.19
9.59
0.09
11.70
353
22
1802
0.38
0.19
13.24
0.11
15.57
362
2488
0.50
0.19
16.89
0.14
19.43
362
3175
0.50
0.20
19.33
0.17
21.95
362
3861
The tank manufacturer will design the roofing system and rafter spacing.
Estimated roof wt. estimated_roof_unitwt 15 psf
W r estimated_roof_unitwt
h'
12 2
.75
2/28/2013
W r 13 kip
total roof DL
5 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Sloshing of Water in Tank: 13.5.4.4 The freeboard provided shall meet the requirements of
Table 29, unless otherwise specified. The sloshing wave height shall be determined by the
equation; note SD1 0.67 and SDS 0.67
Sloshing calculations:
A c 0.216
Tc 3.318 s
A f
A i 0.239
Since Tc is less than T.L, equation 13-55 applies for Seismic Use Group III
K SD1
Tc
0.303
sec
Eqn 13-52
d .5 D A f 4.998 ft
Freeboard 5 ft
Detailed Prgm. to Analyze Each Shell Course (not currently in AWWA). Determine
convective & impulsive water weights and moment arms around tank base; calc moments for
both tank shell (EBP=excluding bottom pressure) & slab foundation (IBP=including bottom
pressure); determine shell wt., roof wt., shears, moments and slosh height; D 33 ft and
hTank
ft
p 40
Moments & Shears Prgm
Accum.
Sum of
Shell
Slab
M oment,
M oment,
432
kip*ft
20
kip*ft
20
67
67
Shear,
kips
Shell wts.,
7
17
434
30
437
646
662
43
440
1462
3045
60
444
4550
6525
76
448
8047
10076
6 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
The following program determines the vertical shell buckling stress and required shell thickness
of each shell course (not in AWWA D100)
Vertical Buckling Prgm.
The following program determines effective shell stress and required shell thickness of each
shell course based upon principle dynamic hoop stress (tension) and vertical stress (compression)
using Henky Von Mises Eqs. e =
The following programs determine greater of static, dynamic, vertical buckling, effective stress
(not req'd by AWWA) or 1/4" min. shell thickness for each shell course (this departs from
AWWA); pick greatest for req'd design; compare existing shell thickness to required design
shell thickness..."OK" if exst. is greater than design; determine order of equations used to solve
for max. wall thickness
Shell Thickness Summary Prgms
Shell Thick
(in)
Req'd Shell
Shell Course
Req'd Shell
Wt (kips)
Thickness (in)
Course Wt ( Status
Governing Condition
kips)
0.31
6.6
0.25
5.3
OK
1/4" min.
0.31
10.6
0.25
8.5
OK
1/4" min.
0.38
12.7
0.25
8.5
OK
1/4" min.
0.38
12.7
0.25
8.5
OK
1/4" min.
0.50
16.9
0.25
8.5
OK
1/4" min.
0.50
16.9
0.29
9.8
OK
Vert. Buckling
Pw q z GC f 30C f
V 93.951 mph
q z 0.00256 K z IV 2
2/28/2013
Kz
qz,
p sf
Exp o sur e D
Pw ,
F,
ar m,
p sf
kip s
ft
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
0 .3
3 .3
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
2 9 .7
4 5.3
4 2 .5
3 6 .0
2 8 .0
2 0 .0
12 .0
4 .0
M o ment ,
ki p * f t
15. 3
13 8 .9
18 8 .2
14 6 .4
10 4 .6
6 2 .7
2 0 .9
6 76 . 9
7 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Kz
qz,
p sf
Exp o sur e D
Pw ,
F,
ar m,
p sf
kip s
ft
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
1.2 7
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
3 3 .0
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
19 .8
D i st ance
t o G r o und ,
ft
4 6 .0
4 5.0
4 0 .0
3 2 .0
2 4 .0
16 . 0
8 .0
0 .3
3 .3
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
5. 2
4 5.3
4 2 .5
3 6 .0
2 8 .0
2 0 .0
12 .0
4 .0
2 9 .7
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
M o ment ,
ki p * f t
15. 3
13 8 .9
18 8 .2
14 6 .4
10 4 .6
6 2 .7
2 0 .9
6 76 . 9
M w 536.4 kip ft
Pw
10.625 106 tt
D
Paw
tt
Conclusion:
1.5
h' 154.52
tt 0.313 " shell course height Hs 45 ft is less than h' 154.52 ft total
height calculated; therefore intermediate wind girders are not req'd for this shell area.
Intermediate Wind Girder Prgm
Check tank stability for Seismic overturning to determine seismic loads would require anchor
bolts. Hs 45 ft and D 33 The equations apply to self anchored tanks only (where J<.785)
and do not apply to mechanically anchored tank.
Ri
Rc
Ai
Ac
M s, kip*ft
Vf, kip
1.5
0.239
0.216
8047
450
2.5
1.5
0.287
0.216
9485
537
2/28/2013
8 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Check using tank bottom thickness = 1/4 inch then use thicker tank bottom thickness until
J<0.785. try using tank bottom thickess = 1/2 inch or more if 1/4 inch thickness does not work.
Refer to Table below that shows solutions for varying annular ring thicknesses
1
tb in
2
Fy 36000
.216
tb
in
Fy
H
ft
ft 4.207
A ft
0.5
s
.035 D 1.155
0.5
lb
logic to select lesser value for minimum width of bottom annulus per Eq. 13-38
tb
L min .216
in
wL 0
ws
Ws
D ft
ft .035 D ft
Hs
ft
Fy
L 1.155 ft
ws 738
lbf
ft
Weight of portion of tank roof that bears on tank shell, lbs/ft. Use 1.5 factor to account for
weight of rafters and girders in addition to assumed roof weight of:
wr
Wr
D ft
wt ws wr
2/28/2013
estimated_roof_unitwt 15 psf
1.5 185.625 plf
wt 923
lbf
ft
9 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
wt
wt
lbf
wt 923
ft
wL 0
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
1. The resisting force is adequate for tank stability when the overturning ratio J determined by
Eq 13-36 is less than 1.54. The maximum width of annulus for determining the resisting force is
3.5 percent of the tank diameter D.
2. The shell compression satisfies Sec. 13.5.4.2.
3. The required thickness of the bottom annulus tb does not exceed the thickness of the bottom
shell ring per Sec. 13.5.4.1.2.4.
4. Piping flexibility requirements of Sec. 13.6 are satisfied.
5. For tank stability there are 3 conditions; 1) For J < 0.785 there is no shell uplift due to the
overturning moment and the tank is self-anchored. 2) For 0.785 < J < 1.54 there is shell uplift, but
the tank is stable provided the shell compression requirements of Sec. 13.5.4.2 are satisfied. 3)
For J > 1.54 the tank is not stable. Modify the bottom annulus, within the limits of tb and L, or
provide mechanical anchors.
The CH2M HILL policy permits self anchored tanks only if J<0.785.
Ms_sa
ft lbf
2
J 9.802
D wt 1 0.4 A v wL
Stability
"No uplift"
if J .785
Conclusion:
2/28/2013
since J 9.802
otherwise
10 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
AWWA D100, Section 13.5.4.2.2: Longitudinal shell compression for mechanically anchored tanks
shall be determined by eqn 13-39:
wt 923.177
A v 0.094
Ms_a
1.273
ft lbf
1
c wt 1 .4 A v
2
t
n
D
12
c 1727 psi
in
t_Rc
R 16.5 ft
psi
.0035372 if 34000 Fy
t'
t'
17.5 105 1 50000
t'
if
t_Rc
R
R
AWWA Table 9
FL 5828 psi
t'
if t_Rc
.0125
R
t'
if 25000 Fy 34000
R
t'
otherwise
R
Conclusion:
2/28/2013
11 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
M 8047 kip ft
lbf
wt wt
ft
wt 0.923
W' D ft wt
kip
ft
tank shell wt. plus roof DL on shell
W' 96 kip
Net Tensile Area, AISC Table 7-17 for 1.25" diameter bolt: ASTM A193, Grade B7 bolts
2
d 2.0 in
A b
A net 2.5 in
A b 3.142 in
Number of anchors:
SL
D ft
nbolt
nbolt 20
5.184 ft
D 33
Seis 1.33
Dac 33.33 ft
Ft 31.25 ksi
12 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Seismic Anchorage;
Pas
4 M
nbolt Dac
W'
nbolt
Wind Anchorage;
Paw
4 Mw
nbolt Dac
W'
nbolt
R 16.5 ft
tank radius, in
d 2 in
bolt diameter
t tn
t 0.5 in
g d 1 in
g 3 in
a g 4 in
a 7 in
2/28/2013
1
assume jmin = in
2
13 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
m tb
m 0.5 in
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
h 18 in
1.33 20 ksi
26.6 ksi
Conclusion:
Shell thickness:
t 0.5 in
OK
Check top plate thickness using Steel Plate Engineering Data Vol. 2, eqn 45:
Pas 43.5 kip
S S 26.6 ksi
d 2 in
b d
1
4
d
2
1
8
in f 1.125 in
in 2 4.5 in
emin 2 8 in
Exx 60ksi
1
2
Pas
c
( .375 g .22 d)
S f
0.998 in
c 1
in
in 8
c Ceil
c 1 in
2/28/2013
jmin 0.68 in
14 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
Find req'd shell plate thickness, height of chair, top plate width, top plate depth, top plate
thickness, stiffener thickness, and fillet weld sizes using Eqs 45-51,
Z
1.0 in
.177 a m
0.941
(Eqn 47)
1.0 in
t
Rt
Sv
Pas e
2
1.32 Z
1.43 a h 2
2
4 a h
Rt
21487102.878 pcf
R t
.031
(Eqn 46)
Pas
( a 2 h)
W weld
1.012
kips
W H
in
Pas emin
a h .667 h
kips
2
2
W v W H 1.132
in
0.509
kips
in
2 1
kips
in 3.182
2 4
in
W weld 1.132
kips
in
OK
h 18 in
a 7 in
b 4.5 in
c 1 in
jmin 0.68 in
tmin 0.38 in
2/28/2013
Use 3/4"
15 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
.90
ACI 318, Eqs. 9-6 where H is load due to soil & water pressure
U = .9 D 1.6 W 1.6 H
ft
tank diameter
q w h
q 93.37 psf
D 33
h p 40 ft water height
pressure
Ko .50
f y 60 ksi
Df 4.0 ft
b 5 ft
A s
Ko Df D ft q
1.6 T
T 3.081 kip
A s 0.091 in
fy
No_6
No_8
b A st_min 8.64 ft in
.44 2
in
0.79
A st 12 .79 in 9.48 in
2/28/2013
16 of 17
AWWA D100
Moin - Costa Rica
Engineer: T. Tovey, PE
Check: S. Goto, PE
wt_ring Df b c
wt_ring 3.000
wt 0.923
b
2
kip
ft
kip
ft
30 in)
b
kip
wt_water h p w wt_water 6.225
2
ft
wt_ring 3.000
kip
wt
0.923
6.225 ft
wt_water
A b
P'
A 5
ft
wt_ring
wt
wt_water
I R b
toe
heel
I 70562 ft
P' M'
S
A
P' M'
S
A
P'
static
A
ft
c R
toe 3911
psf
148
heel
toe
b 19556.3 lbf
739.5 ft
heel
P' 10.148
kip
ft
c 16.5 ft
I
c
S 4276 ft
OK
unit footing
loads
Conclusion:
The computed positive pressure (see above) on both the anchor bolt tension side of the tank and
the anchor bolt compression side of the tank indicates uplift due to seismic (this analysis based
on overall tank moments). The rectangular footing is considered by contractors to be less
expensive since it can be placed in one pour and stem wall forming is not required extra.
2/28/2013
17 of 17