WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Tony Abbott, Federal Leader 28-5-2010

Tony.Abbott.MP@aph.gov.au
5 .
Cc: Ted Baillieu, State leader ted.baillieu@parliament.vic.gov.au,
Dr David Kemp, State president c/o membership@vic.liberal.org.au
Tony Null, State director c/o membership@vic.liberal.org.au
State Assembly Steering Committee C/o Chris Earl <musosm@bigpond.net.au>
10 .
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
.
Ref; Tony Abbott – Re Malcolm Fraser - etc
Tony,
15 As I indicated in past writings the Liberal Party’s constitution has shown as an objective
“ (b) to enhance the freedom, prosperity and security of every Australian. ” And obviously foreign
nationals do not fall within this concept. However, regardless if I do or do not agree with Mr
Malcolm Fraser as a CONSTITUTIONALIST who I view his resignation could have been
likely avoided if the Liberal Party had adapted my previous recommendations as to relinquish
20 most of the work regarding refugees to the United Nations and only when it has assessed and
processed if a person is a genuine refugee or not then and only then will the Commonwealth of
Australia get involved with for itself assessing any person the United Nations has so to say
cleared. As such the Commonwealth of Australia would avoid doing the initial assessment and as
such at a greatly reduced cost to taxpayers have the benefits of the United Nations taking control
25 of refugees and we would have less burdensome upon the courts, including the High Court of
Australia dealing with numerous refugee cases. As such the following is to apply:
 Any person who arrives in the Commonwealth of Australia without proper authority is
handed over to the United Nations for it to assess and process the person
 Any person found to overstay any visa is also handed over to the United Nations for
30 assessment and processing.
 The United Nations will record (throughout the world) the date of the person’s arrival and
this will be forever a number for the person for assessment and processing.
 The United Nations will provide any country it request to take in a certain person as a
refugee with a copy of its files relating to that person and then this country can do it’s
35 own assessment if it desires to accept this person or not.
 The United Nations can transfer any person in its care to facilities (United Nations
centres) elsewhere it has in the world where it deems it is appropriate regarding the
person concerned.
 The Commonwealth of Australia, and so any other nation, is not bound to accept any
40 particular person where such person was to be found by the United Nations to be a
genuine refugee because the sovereign right of each country cannot be interfered with and
hence each country ultimately determines for itself which, if any, person it accepts.
 For purpose of a “United Nations centre” the Commonwealth may provide an island that
can be used as a “UNC” in the same manner as ordinary applies to embassies. As such the
45 United Nations will have full and total responsibilities for those persons under its control.
p1 27-5-20 10
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1 st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax
0011 -61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
  Where the UNC cleared a person but afterwards it is found that the person had concealed
certain details which may or could have affected him being granted the right to enter
and/or remain in the Commonwealth of Australia then the person is returned to the UNC
for a complete re-assessment. As such, a person who conceals details will ultimately
5 place his own long term benefits at risk.
 Children born within a UNC may be deemed to be a child born in the Commonwealth of
Australia if the parent(s) of the child subsequently were permitted to reside in the
Commonwealth of Australia.
 Those persons longest in a UNC will be the first reco0mmended for settlement if they
10 have been cleared, as to ensure that there is so to say no que jumping.
 A person who were to leave as UNC and say use people smugglers to try to get or land
into the Commonwealth of Australia will be handed over to the UNC and it will be for
the UNC to deal with that person appropriately, either return the person to the UNC he
left from or keep him at any other UNC.
15 .
With this system in place the issue of if refugees are or aren’t provided with human rights, etc, all
then will be the responsibilities of the UNC.
This UNC system would avoid any kind of detention centres overflowing, no Pacific solution
needed, etc, and in the overall the UNC can provide more appropriate facilities for families, etc.
20 .
I made (on 19 March 2010) an electronic application for membership of the Liberal Party and
found that despite of the Liberal Party’s constitution clause 3.4A I was denied nevertheless any
of those benefits.
.
25 I was denied to discuss the Liberal Party’s constitution prior to joining and found that after
joining I am basically told to shut up. As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I am very much a person
who desires to check out constitutions and with the Liberal party’s constitution I found that
despite objecting to the application of clause 5.3 basically no one care less about this, do not
understand let alone comprehend how to deal appropriately with an objection and even when I
30 attend albeit “UNDER PROTEST” to a meeting find to bel left there wasting my time as no one
attended to me for the meeting. The stubbornness is such that They nevertheless disregard what
is appropriate conduct and I am advise the State Assembly will vote upon my application no
matter what is appropriate. Now, if a party cannot even manage itself then how on earth can it
manage to be in government I wonder. Now we are likely to see that the State Assembly will be
35 voting against my “application” regardless it is in no legal provision to do so and this may again
underline how absurd the conduct of some officials is.
.
The objective in the Liberal Party’s constitution “(b) to enhance the freedom, prosperity and
security of every Australian.” obviously is not at all practiced by those officials concerned.
40 .
Now, take it that the State Assembly will get a recommendation to oppose my application and
vote as such, it will make not one iota of difference because failing to follow proper procedure I
still am and remain to be a member. Obviously, I enjoy them trying to put this rot upon me as an
Author of books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series I will have ample of fun to expose who
45 ridiculous some of the clauses of the Liberal Party’s constitution is and in conflict with what is
(under the provisions of the federal) constitution applicable, etc.
What you therefore have is a leader missing in action and with officials seemingly more
interested in their own importance then to consider what the objective of the Liberal Party’s
constitution is, “(b) to enhance the freedom, prosperity and security of every Australian.”!
50 Little wonder Mr Malcolm Fraser resigned when the rot seems to be spreading like some
cancer and a person like myself pointing it out then finds to be obstructed rather then the Liberal
Party welcoming my honesty and willing to embrace to rectify any errors.

p2 27-5-20 10
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1 st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax
0011 -61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
 I have avoided publications since 19 March 2010 as I held that I should give the Liberal Party
some time to at least come to its senses but as is now clear Chris Earl of the State Assembly
Steering Committee and others determined to push on with their rot then I am left no alternative
but accepting their refusal to address matters appropriately and to have the Liberal Party’s
5 constitution amended to get rid of any conflicts.
.
Chris Earl of the State Assembly Steering Committee even demanded from me to disclose the
identity of a Liberal Party Parliamentarian who had given me certain information. I made clear it
was none of his business. Likewise, where there are parliamentarian Liberal Party members who
10 disclosed to me details in confidence I am not going to reveal their identities because again I
view Chris Earl of the State Assembly Steering Committee went beyond his authority to seek to
pressure me to disclose details against my wishes. As I made clear clause 5.3 doesn’t apply and
so he has in the first place no authority to even question me and certainly not in the tone that my
wife became upset about it as she was able to overhear what Chris Earl was stating to me even
15 so the speaker phone was not on. I found his conduct to be rude and arrogant and totally uncalled
for.
.
In my view the Liberal Party does best getting rid of those who cannot accept that they must act
within the framework of the Liberal Party’s constitution and that if there is any conflict within
20 the Liberal Party’s constitution then there must be a proper process followed to resolve this and
not so to say some standover (bullying) by a official as to try to get his way regardless this is
contrary to the spirit of the Liberal Party’s constitution objective; “(b) to enhance the freedom,
prosperity and security of every Australian.”
.
25 Look at it this way that about 10 weeks after I made an electronic application the Liberal Party
still couldn’t even manage to set up a proper protocol to deal with my objections as what I am
told is that they have the power and that is it. This is the very kind of conduct that results to
TYRRANY and DICTATORSHIP!
As I indicated above there are ways to deal with matters and within the constitutional framework,
30 such as setting up United Nations Centres as to relieve countries being swamped with refugees,
etc, and limited in assessing people. But how can the Liberal Party really deal with these kinds of
recommendations when it cannot even manage its own internal affairs?
Not once did Ted Baillieu bother to even acknowledge my writings and as such he clearly is “a
leader missing in action”. While Ted Baillieu is on about law and order somehow with internal
35 Liberal Party policies he doesn’t seem to bother to attend to them.
.
We have people who are hurting big time and as a CONSTITUTIONALST I am I have ample
of solutions how to reduce this suffering by so many but again the Liberal Party seems to be
more concerned about power play within then to be a alternative government.
40 If the Liberal Party were to proceed with this State Assembly vote in regard of my membership
application regardless it failed to follow proper procedures, and has no powers to do so then rest
assure I will have a so to say a ball to expose this.
The spirit of the Liberal Party’s constitution objective; “(b) to enhance the freedom, prosperity and
security of every Australian.” And hence I must disclose this rot to the people at large so they can
45 consider for themselves if they really do want to have the Liberal Party back into power when it
cannot even appropriately deal with its own internal matters! I didn’t check out the constitutions
of other political parties as I had no need to do so , and perhaps may do so in time to come but I
view that about 10 weeks is a long time and if a party cannot in that time even deal with matters
appropriately then there is something terrible wrong within the Liberal Party. I can very much
50 understand some of the grievances of certain Liberal Party members as clearly the Liberal Party
is not at all operating to its objective the spirit of the Liberal Party’s constitution objective; “ (b)

p3 27-5-20 10
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1 st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax
0011 -61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
 to enhance the freedom, prosperity and security of every Australian.” But rather is so to say the toy
of some officials and so to say the hell with anyone who doesn’t like that.
What is needed is so to say a cleaning out and get more competent people in positions who are
not so to say up themselves about their importance but who will foremost act in accordance to
5 the Liberal Party’s objective; the spirit of the Liberal Party’s constitution objective; “(b) to
enhance the freedom, prosperity and security of every Australian. ”.
.
I understand that the Liberal Party is likely going to pre-select (for the seat of Ivanhoe) a former
Australian Labor Party member and it seems everything is done to keep me from being pre-
10 selected as such. Well in elections every seat can make the difference of winning government or
not and ample of electors may desire not to vote for a former Australian Labor Party member and
then having to fork out perhaps some $60,000.00 for a by-election for a councillor and so one has
to ask who’s interest are they really seeking to serve by all this rot?
.
15 As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I have a knowledge that none other Liberal Party member seems
to know and understand (hence the Liberal Party’s constitution as such is also so to say up the
creek for this, then the Liberal Party would have done better not to obstruct me in seeking to
expose the rot but have attended to it. But, as always when you get people who are more
indulged into their own importance then to pursue what the party’s objective stands for then
20 cooperation is the least one can expect and then making it public is the best way to seek to
somehow achieve some appropriate action. And as I do so for the objective “(b) to enhance the
freedom, prosperity and security of every Australian. ” then obviously I am doing the right thing
now by publishing it. And perhaps the State Assembly may just realise that where I challenged
the validity of clause 5.3 then the State Assembly select committee had a legal obligation to
25 appropriately deal with this and failing to do so cannot be used against me and my membership is
and remains to be valid and considering I didn’t cave in by bullying then I am the right person
for pre-selection as “leadership” is what is needed. Anyhow whatever will flow from it at least I
can have some fun from it to expose it all. Just that the Liberal Party could have worked with me
to address the issues appropriately as to have shown that it is willing to be open minded. Well, it
30 seems that might be too much to ask, at least that appears to be now so, to me.
.
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I have absolutely no doubt that I can challenge any other Liberal
Party member as to his/her knowledge about the constitution and so also how the Liberal Party’s
constitution is in conflict with it. The mere fact that the Liberal Party’s constitution is as it is
35 proves not a single Liberal Party (regardless of being lawyers) ever realised what was wrong
with it. If a party cannot even manage its own constitution then how will it do any better with the
constitution we all rely upon? Again as author of books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
on certain constitutional and other legal issues I can expose what no one else ever realised there
to exist and that makes my books so interesting for reading! Obviously it would have been better
40 if the Liberal party was to have been more cooperative to appropriately address the issues but
that is something that in time the Liberal Party may realise it failed to do.
.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

.

45 Our name is our motto!

.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

p4 27-5-20 10
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1 st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax
0011 -61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com