Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research/Naval Medical Research Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with all
applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of animals in
research. The institutional animal care facility is fully AAALAC
accredited, and the veterinary staff is familiar with our swine model
for DCS.
Swine were purchased from a single vendor and acclimatized for a
minimum of 5 days prior to experimentation. Swine were housed
singly and fed 22.5% of body weight twice daily (Lab diet Mini Pig
Grower, Quality Lab Products, Elkridge MA); water was provided ad
libitum. On the evening prior to the experiment the animal was fasted
overnight but allowed free access to water.
71
72
Mahon RT et al.
Hyperbaric Chamber
Experimental Protocol
An experimental flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1. Baseline data
were recorded for 30 min after which the intravascular pressure
monitors were disconnected and the swine was inserted into the
hyperbaric chamber. Sensors for ECG and NICOM were reconnected
to through-hull cables to enable continuous monitoring during hyperbaric exposure. The chamber was then compressed to 200 feet of sea
water (fsw) using a nonlinear compression profile described in detail
elsewhere (27). The total time of compression and maintenance at 200
fsw was 31 min; the chamber was then decompressed to atmospheric
pressure at 30 fsw/min. Throughout the hyperbaric exposure, animals
breathed chamber atmosphere air maintained at 21% (0.02%) O2
and a surface equivalent of CO2 0.5% (0.05%).
After reaching surface pressure the swine was removed from the
chamber and reconnected to the pressure transduction cables. The
animal was closely observed for any signs of cutis marmorata (CM),
a morbiliform purple discoloration of the skin that is a form of DCS
(skin bends) and is a predictor for DCS severity in swine (4). Time 0
was defined as CM onset at which time either PFC or normal saline
was infused at 5 ml/kg over 10 min as well as 100% O2 supplied for
60 min using a cone mask (Smith Medical North America, Waukesha,
WI). Animals were observed and data collected for 90 min after CM
onset.
Arterial blood gas samples were collected during the baseline
period and at 30, 60, and 90 min following the CM onset and analyzed
by an ABL 835 blood gas analyzer (Radiometer Copenhagen, Denmark). On completion of the 90-min observation period, ketamine (20
mg/kg iv) was administered, and all sensors, electrodes, and arterial
catheters were removed. The jugular introducer sheath was guide-wire
exchanged for a single-lumen central catheter and sutured into place.
All wounds were closed. A second dose of buprenorphine (0.01 0.1
mg/kg) was administered and the animal was allowed to recover.
After recovery, swine were returned to their holding pens and
observed for any discomfort or paralysis. Any evidence of discomfort
was treated with buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg im), 23 times daily as
needed. Paralyzed animals were observed at least four times per 24-h
period for interventions that included hand feeding, watering, manual
bladder expression, and repositioning. If their oral intake appeared
inadequate animals were periodically placed in a Panepinto sling for
intravenous fluids. All animals that survived the initial experimental
phase were maintained for 48 h post-hyperbaric exposure.
After completion of the observation period (48 h), animals received
heparin (100 IU/kg; Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Schaumberg, IL) and
were transported to the necropsy suite for humane euthanization with
intravenous Euthasol (11.5 ml/10 lbs; Virbac Animal Health, Fort
Worth, TX). Whole body perfusion fixation was performed (10%
buffered formalin) and the brain and spinal cord were harvested as
well as samples of spleen, kidney, liver, heart, lung, small and large
intestines, and blood. Animals that did not survive to the study end
point (48 h) did not undergo pathological evaluation. Pathology
results are reported separately.
Data Analysis
Data calculations were performed via DataLyser, a locally developed Lab Windows (National Instruments, Austin, TX)-based pro-
73
Mahon RT et al.
Pressure (fsw)
200
ABG
ABG
ABG
ABG
Events
Baseline
Monitoring
Hyperbaric
Exposure
Decompression
De-instrumentation
Surgical repair
48-hr observation
Observation &
Reconnection
Timeline
Euthanasia
30
31
6.7
T=0
+30
+60
+90
DCS
Diagnosis
Time (minutes)
Fig. 1. Schematic of experimental procedures and timeline with pressure exposure in feet of sea water (fsw). ABG, arterial blood gas; DCS, decompression
sickness.
not significantly different when comparing all animals randomized to PFC to all animals randomize to saline (10.48 vs. 8.28
min post-surfacing, P 0.24). DCS onset was quicker in
females than males (7.30 vs. 11.46 min post-surfacing, P
0.02). Mean CO, PAP, SAP, and HR were elevated in all
groups during the period between reaching surface pressure
and DCS onset. These post-surfacing preonset elevations were
all statistically significant (P 0.05) compared with group
mean baselines except for CO in males randomized to PFC
treatment and HR in females randomized to PFC treatment
(Table 2, Fig. 2).
Hemodynamics Throughout the 90-min Observation Period
When the 90-min post-DCS observation period was taken as
a whole, CO and PAP were significantly elevated in the PFC
RESULTS
General
There were no significant weight differences between
groups. However, there was significant variability in baseline
cardiovascular parameters among the four treatment/sex
groups (Table 1).
DCS Onset
All animals developed CM and were diagnosed with DCS.
Prior to any treatment initiation, time to CM (DCS onset) was
PAP, mmHg
CO, l/min
HR, beats/min
SAP, mmHg
PFC/female
PFC/male
Saline/female
Saline/male
P value
18.21
19.50
20.51
23.07
0.05
8.78
4.62
6.00
6.85
0.05
125.24
177.37
136.53
137.04
0.05
111.43
102.06
113.72
109.37
0.05
PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; CO, cardiac output; HR, heart rate; SAP,
systemic arterial pressure; PFC, perfluorocarbons.
vs. male
Cardiac Output
(% Baseline)
7.26
6.89
0.05
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
120
100
80
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
FPC/Female
PFC/Male
Saline/Female
Saline/Male
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
0
.59
80
70
80
.570
60
.560
.5-
Time (minutes)
50
.55
40
.5-
50
40
60
30
140
160
.53
180
.52
200
20
220
10
vs. male
127.22
122.01
0.05
240
nse
t
0-1
0
vs. male
75
126.98
168.33
0.05
SO
PFC mean
Saline mean
P value: PFC vs. saline
vs. male
29.32
29.83
0.05
BL
En
Ex d HB
po
sur
e
PFC mean
Saline mean
P value: PFC vs. saline
PAP, mmHg
33.41
Female mean
25.78
Male mean
0.05
P value: female
CO, l/min
7.20
Female mean
6.95
Male mean
0.05
P value: female
HR, beats/min
124.52
Female mean
170.51
Male mean
0.05
P value: female
SAP, mmHg
124.54
Female mean
124.72
Male mean
0.05
P value: female
115
PFC mean
Saline mean
P value: PFC vs. saline
120
Sex Effects
SAP (% Baseline)
PFC mean
Saline mean
P value: PFC vs. saline
Mahon RT et al.
125
Treatment Effects
DC
74
75
Mahon RT et al.
Table 3. Comparison of time to peak PAP and PAP measurement after CM onset and treatment for DCS (concurrent)
Males
Females
Combined Sexes
Treatment
Oxycyte
Saline
Combined treatments
45.95
33.73
39.37
12.08
7.64
9.69
44.33
43.30
43.82
6.25
6.56
6.41*
45.02
38.83
8.75
7.07
CM, cutis marmorata. *Significantly different from corresponding males at P 0.05 level.
Table 4. Effect of sex differences in 10-min intervals between female swine injected with saline vs. male swine injected with
saline using data normalized to baseline
Time Period, min
010
10.520
20.530
Sal/F mean
Sal/M mean
P value
206.13
155.34
0.05
221.71
165.89
0.05
214.30
168.57
0.05
Sal/F mean
Sal/M mean
P value
86.49
97.03
0.05
88.82
101.71
0.05
99.29
105.87
0.05
Sal/F mean
Sal/M mean
P value
94.01
123.89
0.05
91.51
123.81
0.05
93.03
128.57
0.05
Sal/F mean
Sal/M mean
P value
126.05
134.35
0.05
122.93
132.09
0.05
112.92
123.93
0.05
30.540
40.550
PAP, mmHg
173.25
151.40
143.68
131.59
0.05
0.05
CO, l/min
109.95
102.74
111.26
111.12
0.05
0.05
HR, beats/min
98.50
100.57
134.98
130.37
0.05
0.05
SAP, mmHg
106.77
104.93
112.95
112.82
0.05
0.05
50.560
60.570
70.580
80.590
127.69
122.79
0.05
116.51
107.65
0.05
104.29
109.20
0.05
107.06
115.22
0.05
98.41
107.61
0.05
95.77
111.46
0.05
86.70
106.59
0.05
81.23
99.52
0.05
101.36
127.33
0.05
100.76
134.37
0.05
99.55
141.02
0.05
100.23
146.31
0.05
105.27
112.76
0.05
105.90
113.28
0.05
106.84
113.65
0.05
107.11
113.06
0.05
76
Mahon RT et al.
Table 5. Effect of female vs. male swine injected with PFC in 10-min intervals after DCS onset using data normalized to
baseline
Time Period, min
010
10.520
20.530
PFC/F mean
PFC/M mean
P value
204.43
192.64
0.05
197.89
199.75
NS
180.36
206.05
0.05
PFC/F mean
PFC/M mean
P value
106.60
87.22
0.05
101.07
87.54
0.05
104.34
94.04
0.05
PFC/F mean
PFC/M mean
P value
102.05
83.92
0.05
88.73
86.31
0.05
82.17
93.64
0.05
PFC/F mean
PFC/M mean
P value
159.19
129.66
0.05
146.19
123.07
0.05
139.99
111.36
0.05
30.540
40.550
PAP, mmHg
165.19
164.38
176.98
157.51
0.05
0.05
CO, l/min
94.99
89.34
101.57
98.91
0.05
0.05
HR, beats/min
85.09
85.48
86.33
83.23
0.05
0.05
SAP, mmHg
130.20
125.65
108.80
108.28
0.05
0.05
50.560
60.570
70.580
80.590
163.53
158.02
0.05
167.78
158.21
0.05
194.01
171.97
0.05
196.30
180.09
0.05
91.42
91.17
0.05
87.68
91.55
0.05
83.61
91.83
0.05
79.13
88.43
0.05
86.85
80.45
0.05
90.83
81.22
0.05
95.36
90.28
0.05
N/A
121.91
108.76
0.05
120.90
109.14
0.05
124.03
106.47
0.05
123.18
N/A
Table 6. Effect of PFC vs. saline in 10-min intervals in female swine using data normalized to baseline
Time Period, min
010
10.520
20.530
PFC/F mean
Sal/F mean
P value
204.43
206.13
NS
197.89
221.71
0.05
180.36
214.30
0.05
PFC/F mean
Sal/F mean
P value
106.60
86.49
0.05
101.07
88.82
0.05
104.34
99.29
0.05
PFC/F mean
Sal/F mean
P value
102.05
94.01
0.05
88.73
91.51
0.05
82.17
93.03
0.05
PFC/F mean
Sal/F mean
P value
159.19
126.05
0.05
146.19
122.93
0.05
139.99
112.92
0.05
30.540
40.550
PAP, mmHg
165.19
164.38
173.25
151.40
0.05
0.05
CO, l/min
94.99
89.34
109.95
102.74
0.05
0.05
HR, beats/min
85.09
85.48
98.50
100.57
0.05
0.05
SAP, mmHg
130.20
125.65
106.77
104.93
0.05
0.05
50.560
60.570
70.580
80.590
163.53
127.69
0.05
167.78
116.51
0.05
194.01
104.29
0.05
196.30
107.06
0.05
91.42
98.41
0.05
87.68
95.77
0.05
83.61
86.70
0.05
79.13
81.23
0.05
86.85
101.36
0.05
90.83
100.76
0.05
95.36
99.55
0.05
100.23
N/A
121.91
105.27
0.05
120.90
105.90
0.05
124.03
106.84
0.05
123.18
107.11
0.05
77
Mahon RT et al.
Table 7. Effect of PFC vs. saline therapy in 10-min intervals on male swine using data normalized to baseline
Time Period, min
010
10.520
20.530
PFC/M mean
Sal/M mean
P value
192.64
155.34
0.05
199.75
165.89
0.05
206.05
168.57
0.05
PFC/M mean
Sal/M mean
P value
87.22
97.03
0.05
87.54
101.71
0.05
94.04
105.87
0.05
PFC/M mean
Sal/M mean
P value
83.92
123.89
0.05
86.31
123.81
0.05
93.64
128.57
0.05
PFC/M mean
Sal/M mean
P value
129.66
134.35
0.05
123.07
132.09
0.05
111.36
123.93
0.05
30.540
40.550
PAP, mmHg
176.98
157.51
143.68
131.59
0.05
0.05
CO, l/min
101.57
98.91
111.26
111.12
0.05
0.05
HR, beats/min
86.33
83.23
134.98
130.37
0.05
0.05
SAP, mmHg
108.80
108.28
112.95
112.82
0.05
0.05
50.560
60.570
70.580
80.590
158.02
122.79
0.05
158.21
107.65
0.05
171.97
109.20
0.05
180.09
115.22
0.05
91.17
107.61
0.05
91.55
111.46
0.05
91.83
106.59
0.05
88.43
99.52
0.05
80.45
127.33
0.05
81.22
134.37
0.05
90.28
141.02
0.05
146.31
N/A
108.76
112.76
0.05
109.14
113.28
0.05
106.47
113.65
0.05
113.06
N/A
78
Mahon RT et al.
GRANTS
This work was funded by The Office of Naval Research through work unit
0603713N.0000.000.A0902.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: R.T.M. and C.R.A. conception and design of research; R.T.M., W.A.C., and M.B. performed experiments; R.T.M., M.B., and
S.T. analyzed data; R.T.M. interpreted results of experiments; R.T.M. and
C.R.A. drafted manuscript; R.T.M. approved final version of manuscript;
W.A.C., D.P.R., and C.R.A. edited and revised manuscript; S.T. and C.R.A.
prepared figures.
REFERENCES
1. Ball R. Effect of severity, time to recompression with oxygen, and
re-treatment on outcome in forty-nine cases of spinal cord decompression
sickness. Undersea Hyperb Med 29: 133145, 1993.
2. Bassett BE. Twelve year survey of the susceptibility of women to altitude
decompression sickness. Aerospace Medicine Medical Association Annual
Science Meeting Report AQU99-04-0525; 1213, 1980.
3. Bose B, Osterholm JL, Payne JB, Chambers K. Preservation of neuronal function during prolonged focal cerebral ischemia by ventriculocisternal perfusion with oxygenated fluorocarbon emulsion. Neurosurgery 18:
270 276, 1986.
4. Broome JR, Dick ED. Neurological decompression illness in swine. Aviat
Space Environ Med 67: 209 213, 1996.
5. Butler BD, Conkin J, Luehr S. Pulmonary hemodynamics, extravascular
lung water and residual gas bubbles following low dose venous gas
embolism in dogs. Aviat Space Environ Med 60: 1178 1182, 1989.
6. Carpenter CL, Yan E, Chen S, Hong K, Arechiga A, Kim WS, Deng
M, Li Z, Heber D. Body fat and body-mass index among a multiethnic
sample of college-age men and women. J Obes 2013:790654. doi:10.1155/
2013/790654 [Epub 2013 Apr 8].
7. Catron PW, Thomas LB, Flynn ET Jr, McDermott JJ, Holt MA.
Effects of He-O2 breathing during experimental decompression sickness
following air dives. Undersea Biomed Res 14: 101111, 1987.
8. Cianci P, Slade JB Jr. Delayed treatment of decompression sickness with
short, no-air-break tables: Review of 140 cases. Aviat Space Environ Med
77: 10031008, 2006.
9. Dainer H, Nelson J, Brass K, Montcalm-Smith E, Mahon R. Short
oxygen prebreathing and intravenous perfluorocarbon emulsion reduces
morbidity and mortality in a swine saturation model of decompression
sickness. J Appl Physiol 102: 1099 1104, 2006.
10. Dunham CM, Chirichella TJ, Gruber BS, Ferrari JP, Martin JA,
Luchs BA, Hileman BM, Merrell R. Emergency department noninvasive
(NICOM) cardiac outputs are associated with trauma activation, patient
injury severity and host conditions and mortality. J Trauma Acute Care
Surg 73: 479 485, 2012.
11. Eckenhoff RG, Olstad CS, Carrod G. Human dose-response relationship for decompression and endogenous bubble formation. J Appl Physiol
69: 914 918, 1990.
12. Eckmann DM, Armstead SC, Mardini F. Surfactants reduce plateletbubble and platelet-platelet binding induced by in vitro air embolism.
Anesthesiology 103: 1204 1210, 2005.
13. Eckmann DM, Zhang J, Lampe J, Ayyaswamy PS. Gas embolism and
surfactant-based intervention; implications for long-duration space-based
activity. Ann NY Acad Sci 1077: 256 269, 2006.
14. Flaim SF, Hazard DR, Hogan J, Peters RM. Characterization and
mechanism of side-effects of Oxygent HT (highly concentrated fluorocarbon emulsion) in swine. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 22:
15111515, 1994.
15. Gempp E, Blatteau JE. Risk factors and treatment outcome in scuba
divers with spinal cord decompression sickness. J Crit Care 25: 236 242,
2010.
16. Hall JE, Ehrhart IC, Hoffman WF. Pulmonary fluid balance and
hemodynamics after perfluorocarbon infusion in the dog lung. Crit Care
Med 13: 10151019, 1985.
17. Hallenbeck JM. Cinephotomicrography of dog spinal vessels during
cord-damaging decompression sickness. Neurology 26: 190 199, 1976.
Mahon RT et al.
79
30. Pribis P, Burtnack CA, McKenzie SO, Thayer J. Trends in body fat,
body mass index and physical fitness among male and female college
students. Nutrients 2: 10751085, 2010.
31. Randsoe T, Hyldegaard O. Effect of oxygen breathing and perfluorocarbon emulsion treatment on air bubbles in adipose tissue during decompression sickness. J Appl Physiol 107: 18571863, 2009.
32. Smith CR, Parsons JT, Zhu J, Spiess BD. The effect of intravenous
perfluorocarbon emulsions on whole-body oxygenation after severe decompression sickness. Diving Hyperb Med 42: 10 17, 2012.
33. Spiess BD, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Woronowicz AW, Tool KA,
Ivankovich AD. Treatment of decompression sickness with a perfluorocarbon emulsion (FC-43). Undersea Biomed Res 15: 3137, 1988.
34. Spiess BD. Perfluorocarbon emulsions as a promising technology: a
review of tissue and vascular gas dynamics. J Appl Physiol 106: 1444
1452, 2009.
35. Spiess BD, Zhu J, Pierce B, Weis R, Berger BE, Reses J, Smith CR,
Ewbank B, Ward KR. Effects of perfluorocarbon infusion in an anesthetized swine decompression model. J Surg Res 153: 8394, 2009.
36. Szebeni J, Baranyi L, Savay S, Bodo M, Morse DS, Basta M, Stahl
GL, Bunger R, Alving CR. Liposome-induced pulmonary hypertension:
properties and mechanism of a complement-mediated pseudoallergic reaction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H1319 H1328, 2000.
37. Vercellotti GM, Hammerschmidt DE, Craddock PR, Jacob HS. Activation of plasma complement by perfluorocarbon artificial blood: probable
mechanism of adverse pulmonary reactions in treated patients and rationale for corticosteroids prophylaxis. Blood 59: 1299 1304, 1982.
38. Vik A, Jennsen B, Eftedal Brubakk A O. Relationship between venous
bubbles and hemodynamic response after decompression in pigs. Undersea Hyperb Med 20: 233248, 1993.
39. Webb JT, Kannan N, Pilmanis AA. Gender not a factor for altitude
decompression sickness risk. Aviat Space Environ Med 74: 210, 2003.
40. Webb JT, Pilmanis AA, Balldin UI, Fischer JR. Altitude decompression
sickness susceptibility: influence of anthrometric and physiologic variables. Aviat Space Environ Med 76: 547551, 2005.
41. Zhu J, Hullett JB, Somera L, Barbee RW, Ward KR, Berger BE,
Spiess BD. Intravenous perfluorocarbon emulsion increases nitrogen
washout after venous gas emboli in rabbits. Undersea Hyperb Med 34:
720, 2007.