Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAGISTER INGENERIAE
Ill
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
in the
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
at the
RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY
by
BESIM U. BALCI
}l6stract
The ability of construction firms to stay solvent largely depends on productivity.
Productivity improvement is the key to economic prosperity in the long term. It
provides the basis for increasing wages and more prosperous firms. Various methods
can be implemented to measure and increase productivity which will result an
increased output and efficiency.
The aim of this work is to address the methods to be used for labour productivity
measurement and improvement in civil engineering context. A case study will be
done on a current construction project.
CONTENTS
Pg
Abstract
List of Tables
List of Figures
4
5
6
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM STATEMENT
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH APPROACH
CONCLUSION
8
8
10
10
2.4
12
12
13
14
15
18
20
3.3
3.4
3.5
21
INTRODUCTION
OATA COLLECTION
3.2.1 Measuring Inputs and Outputs
3.2.2 Camcorders As Data Collection Tools
PARETO ANALYSIS
WORK STUDY
3.4.1 Method Study
3.4.1.1 Tools For Method Study
3.4.2 Work Measurement
3.4.2.1 Time Study
3.4.2.2 Work Sampling
CONCLUSION
21
22
23
23
24
25
27
30
35
36
41
48
4 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
49
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
4.2.1 Networks
4.2.2 Gantt Charts
COST ESTIMATION AND CONTROL
4.3.1 Estimating Labour Costs
4.3.2 Cost Control
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
FOREMAN DELAY SURVEYS
CONCLUSION
49
49
50
53
54
56
56
57
59
62
63
INTRODUCTION
HUMAN RESOURCES PLANNING AND SELECTION
PROJECT MANAGER AS A LEADER
COMMUNICATION
MOTIVATION THEORIES
5.5.1 Maslow's Hierarchy Of Needs
5.5.2 Herzberg's Satisfiers And Dissatisfiers
5.5.3 McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
63
63
65
66
68
68
68
69
5.6
5.7
6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
SAFETY MANAGEMENT
CONCLUSION
69
71
72
INTRODUCTION
TIME STUDY
WORK SAMPLING
FOREMAN DELAY SURVEY
METHOD STUDY .
CONCLUSION
72
73
77
79
82
86
87
87
87
89
91
94
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
List of rfa6fes
Table 3.1 Relationship between purpose and measurement method
Table 3.2 Pareto Analysis
Table 3.3 Method study recording techniques
Table 3.4 Questioning
Table 3.5 Rates of working
Table 3.6 Relaxation allowances
Table 3.7 Time study observation sheet
Table 3.8 Relaxation allowances- formwork operation
Table 3.9 Activity codes
Table 3.1 0 Field count recording and analysis sheet
Table 3.11 Productive activities in bricklaying
Table 3.12 Non-productive activities in bricklaying
Table 3.13 Contributory activities in bricklaying
Table 3.14 Work Sampling Observation Sheet
Table 4.1 Calculation of man-hours for concrete wall
Table 4.2 Calculation of crew size and resulting duration
Table 4.3 Calculation oflabour costs for concrete wall formwork
Table 4.4 Cost control calculations
Table 4.5 Foreman Delay Survey
Table 4.6 Foreman Delay Survey Summary Form
Table 6.1 Brief description of site conditions and materials
Table 6.2 Time study sheet
Table 6.3 Time study abstract sheet
.
Table 6.4 Relaxation allowances
Table 6.5 Pilot study data
Table 6.6 Work Sampling
Table 6.7 Work Sampling Summary Table
Table 6.8 Foreman Delay Survey Form
Table 6.9 Foreman Delay Survey Summary Form
Table 6.10 Distance Savings
List of Pigures
Figure 1.1 Comparison of labour output trends in the U.K.
Figure 1.2 Comparison of labour output trends in South Africa
Figure 2.1 Relationship between inputs and outputs
Figure 2.2 Productiyity under various environmental conditions
Figure 3.1 Work Study Procedure
Figure 3.2 Typical symbols used in process charts
Figure 3.3 An example of outline process chart
Figure 3.4 Flow process chart of a reinforcement fabrication workshop
Figure 3.5 Crew balance chart- drainage pipe installation crew
Figure 3.6 Crew balance chart- Revised Process
Figure 3.7 String diagram showing concrete distribution in precast yard
Figure 3.8 Typical Construction Workday Breakdown
Figure 4.1 AON format
Figure 4.2 AOA format
Figure 4.3 Gantt Chart Sample
Figure 6.1 Site Layout
Figure 6.2 String Diagram of brick transportation [initial configuration]
Figure 6.3 String Diagram of brick transportation [proposed configuration]
CHAPTER 1
Introduction and (Rgsearcli 06;ectives
1.1 I ntrocfuction
In an increasingly competitive environment with low profit margins, it is productivity
which makes the difference between survival and failure. From 1975 to 1982 there
was a general decline in construction productivity in many biggest economies of the
world such as U.S. and U.K.. Following the decline strict measures were taken and
new management techniques were introduced which led to a new era in construction
productivity. The productivity rates began to increase and costs of production were
lessened. [ 1]
Civil engineering turnover constitutes about 10% of the Gross National Product(GNP)
in many countries. Yet when the productivity rates of construction with other
industries are compared, construction productivity falls below that achieved by the
economy as a whole.[l]
Many practitioners argue that productivity standards for construction work are
impossible to establish within precise limits. The productivity rate of a construction
project depends on many internal and external factors. The external factors are those
which are beyond the control ofthe individual enterprise or company and the internal
factors are those within its control. Some of the external factors are government
regulations, economic demand, capital and labour availability and competition for
resources. The internal factors can be classified as training, management, technology,
work methods, materials, planning and design.[1][2]The focus of this research will be
mostly on the internal factors that affect the productivity.
-----------------------------------------
--------
Labour Productivity in UK
250
200 . - _- _.-.,......... - J!" Construction I
><
150
r~~-----...,.,.~_
.........
,::-...--~-=----. I !
Industry
I
Q)
"C
_..-
l l-11- Manufacturing I
t: 100
Industry_ _____ J
50 -l~-c----~-'-----'----'---~-----~
0-
l_____
~Q)
~Q)
~0.)
fb<o
~0.)
~Q)Oj ~Q)Oj
Year
Figure 1.1 Comparison of labour output trends in the U.K. 1970-1995 [1]
,-----------------------------------------------------1
I
1
I
1
I
I
160
-~~-~-----~---~-----~-~~-----~
14 0 ____.....__.;.._;;,._,...-.,..JL~--,-:-------:---"-->_:__:__---j
120 ~~~---=--~~.----.!~
>< 100 -j_:-----:-----~~--=-~e::!!!~M!C~ ---::-.._--J
~ 80 ~-~-c:: 60
40 ~~-~--~~~--------20 -1-~------~------------I
----~------------,
--+-Construction
---Mining
Agriculture
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
I
I
I
Year
~~-----------------------------
------------------
Figure 1.2 Comparison of labour output trends in South Africa 1970-1997 [NPI]
The industry is still very labour-intensive, therefore the ratio of labour cost to total
cost is higher than manufacturing and other production industries. For example the
costs of internal finishing, plastering, ceiling fixing joinery, floor laying, are still
predominantly labour costs.
The decrease in productivity was mostly used to be attributed to labour but recent
studies has shown that it is rather management and methods causing low productivity
than labour. [4]
1.3
~search
CJ6jectives
First of all the concept of productivity should be made clear. Without understanding
what productivity is, the scope of the current research work can be deviated from the
set target. There are additional concepts such as efficiency and effectiveness that need
to be addressed. Their relationship and difference should be clarified.
study' are most common techniques for analysing the productivity in construction in
this regard. [6] [7]
Motivation is one of the greatest contributors to labour productivity so it will be
discussed in this research as a separate chapter. The relationship between motivation
and productivity is such thatimprovement in one results improvement in the other. [5]
Reliable data collection methods and the criteria on which labour productivity should
be measured will be presented as well. Using the measurement and data collection
methods, the areas of low productivity and the factors that lead unproductive work
will be addressed. Determination of such factors usually contains difficulties
regarding a unique construction project.
To pinpoint the areas that lead to unproductive work and find remedies.
1. 4 (]?gsearcfi Jlpproacfi
The research will be carried out under seven chapters as follows:
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Reseach Objectives
Chapter 2 - Productivity Concept And The Factors Affecting Productivity- This
chapter involves the definitions of terms those are connected with the productivity and
the external and internal
~actors
1.5 Conc{usion
Productivity, representing the efficient conversion of resources into marketable
products, is a major concern of any profit oriented organisation .
In general the word productivity is used as a measure of output per unit of input taken
over a definite period oftime.[3] Higher productivity means accomplishing more with
the same amount of resources.
10
Planning
Supervision
11
CHAPTER2
Productivity Concept and
'Tiie Pactors Jljfecting Productivity
2.1 CJ'Iie Productivity Concept
A simple definition for productivity can be generally given as the relationship
between the outputs generated from a system and the inputs provided to create those
outputs.[9] In civil engineering context it is not much different than this. Labour,
capital (physical and capital assets), energy, materials are the inputs brought into a
system. Goods and services rendered form the output. It can be stated as:
INPUT
'
"Human
Resources
x Materials
x Money
x Machines
x Information
OUTPUT
...,..-
ORCANIZATION
The transformation
process
...,....
Constructed
Facility
PRODUCTIVITY
0 utput/1 nput ..1
Figure 2.1 Relationship between inputs and outputs [9]
12
Higher productivity means getting more with the same amount of input but sometimes
productivity is confused with intensity of work. Intensive use of labour and machines
means excess effort while labour productivity shows beneficial results of labour.[2]
Another confusion arises between productivity and profitability. Even when the work
is unproductive, profit can be obtained by price adjustments. Conversely, high
productivity does not necessarily result in high profits.[2]
The third problem is the confusion between productivity, efficiency and effectiveness.
Efficiency is described as producing high-quality goods in the shortest possible time.
The quality is of course a concern of productivity but it should be considered if the
goods are needed. [2] Effectiveness is defined as the degree to which the goals such as
profit or market share are met and whether the approaches, methods and tools used
are correct. [1] In other words effectiveness can be viewed as achieved goals
compared to what is possible. [2]
Civil engineering turnover constitutes about 10% of the Gross National Product(GNP)
in many countries. However when the productivity rates of construction with other
industries are compared, construction productivity falls below the achieved by the
economy as a whole[l]
13
As the methods, tools and technology become more sophisticated and the competition
accelerates between the companies, a successful contractor should ensure the
maximum rate of production at the minimum cost.
External factors
Internal factors
The external factors are those which are beyond the control of the individual
enterprise and the internal factors are those within its control.
14
Economic Situation
The construction industry productivity greatly depends on the general level of
economic changes and development. The most important economic changes are in
employment
patterns,
the
composition
of capital,
technology,
scale
and
Types of Contracts
The changes in bic:lding and procurement methods in civil engineering field have
affected the productivity. In the traditional delivery method, the owner hires a design
professional who prepares a complete set of contract document for the owner for a
design fee. With the prepared contract documents in hand, the owner either negotiates
a price with a general contractor or bids out the work. There is little interaction that
takes place between parties during design process and lateral changes can cause
delays through slow communication. Hence the productivity is likely to fall. [29]
The traditional separation of designer and contractor is being bridged to some extent
with different type of contracts. One of them is design-build in which there is one
company hired by the owner for both design and building process. The
communication links between the design team and construction team are very strong
so that project can be easily and quickly performed. [29][36]
15
Sub-contracting
The construction industry has shifted considerably from direct labour to
subcontracting, making the main contractor's role managerial and coordinating rather
than constructing. Most of the civil engineering work is carried out by subcontractors
who are specialized in particular areas such as demolition, road works, tunnelling etc.
Considering specific tasks, the work is likely to be performed more effectively under
the responsibility of such.subcontractor. [24]
'It seems generally accepted that subcontract labour is more productive labour... in
part this is due to the fact that direct employees have to be paid for non productive
time ... but the main effect comes from the fact that subcontractors are usually paid by
'the lump' of specified pieces of work... this incentive attracts faster workers and
encourages teams to work effectively '[11]
The Client
Construction clients sometimes can force unnecessary changes, cause delays and
insist on materials those are not easily available. This happens when a client has a
little knowledge in construction procedures. Changes may also take place when client
<
Weather
Unlike most manufacturing industries, building construction takes place in an open
and changing physical environment Manufacturers can control the factors such as
temperature, humidity, wind and precipitation when the work is performed indoor.
But for the construction works it is very unlikely to control.
16
humidity, precipitation and wind. When the climate deviates from the average levels
the work tends to be less productive (Figure 2.2) .[1]
90
80
0~
~ 70
"0
.E
60
::J
.s:::.
Q)
50
>
:;::::;
(\]
40
Q)
0::
30
20
....-.
Figure 2.2
56
57
59
60
61
62
62
62
-10
71 82 89 93 96
73 84 91 95 98
75 86 93 97 99
76 88 94 98 100
77 88 94 98 100
78 88 94 98 100
78 88 94 98 100
78 88 94 98 100
0 10 20 30 40
98
100
98
100
96
98
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
99
100
100
100
100
100
70
Effective Temperature(%)
Productivity under various environmental conditions
93
95
97
99
99
99
99
99
80
84 57
87 68
90 76
93 80
94 82
94 84
93 83
93 82
90 100
0
15
50
57
60
63
62
61
110
[15]
Natural Resources
The most important natural resources are labour, land, energy and raw materials. The
degree which a country manage and use these resources is very important for
productivity improvement. Among these resources the most valuable and crucial
source is labour. [2]
Some countries take great care to invest in educating and training their manpower.
Countries with higher per capita GNP generally have a better trained and educated
population. Investment in these factors improves the productivity of labour force. [2]
Health policies of the government which results in higher life expectancy and low
sickness rates will also result increased productivity. [2]
Project Uniqueness
Projects in construction are never designed or built exactly in the same way as
previous projects. Environmental factors such as the landscape, weather and physical
location force every project to be unique from its predecessors. There are also
17
aesthetic factors -that create uniqueness from project to project. Such factors have a
significant impact upon major project characteristics. While most construction
personnel find this uniqueness to be an attractive element for a career in construction,
it can have an adverse effect upon construction productivity. Project uniqueness
reqmres modifications in the construction processes. These modifications require
workers to go through a learning curve at the beginning stages of each project
activity. [16]
With increased size of projects and complexity the role of management has gained
importance. Managers can no longer be excused by blaming the workers.
Labour
Being the subject of this research, labour is one of the controlling factors for
construction productivity and the labour productivity is directly related to the
motivation of the workers. If management can plan and execute effective incentive
schemes, then the result should be more productive. It is also possible to improve
productivity by co-operation and participation of workers in planning and execution.
[2]
18
Construction Training
There is currently a lack of formal training in construction, the lowest of any major
sector of the econor:ny. This lack of training is due to practical concerns such as
employers completing the increased percentage of nonunion work. In general, the
workforce of contractors is highly mobile. For this reason, contractors are often
reticent to invest capital to train those who may soon be someone else's employees.
The result may be a decrease in the construction workforce average capability level. It
is unclear how this affects productivity. More effective utilization of large narrowskilled and core multi-skilled workforce's may even result in higher productivity on
some projects. [16]
Technology
Technology has had a huge effect on overall productivity. Most of the basic tasks on a
site have seen changes due to advances in technology over recent years. Tools and
machinery have increased both in power and complexity. These advances in
technology can change skill requirements. This can create difficulties in separating
the contributions of technology, management, and labor to productivity.
Introducing new technology can be more difficult in the
const~ction
industry than in
19
2.4 Conc(usion
Productivity can be simply defined as the ratio of outputs to the inputs within a
process or task. To stay competitive in the market, this ratio should be kept as high as
possible. There are internal and external factors those affect the productivity. Internal
factors can be controlled but external factors are outside the control of the company.
The following chapter will focus on productivity measurement and analysis.
20
CHAPTER3
Protfuctivity !JVLeasurement anti;tna[ysis
3.1 Introduction
The productivity of two teams on the same site can differ more than 50% and the
productivity of similar works on different sites can differ up to 5 times. Therefore
there is a huge space for productivity improvement and 20 to 30 percent improvement
of productivity is likely to be achieved in many cases. Productivity measurement
indicates where to look for opportunities for improvement and also indicates how the
improvements are going. [ 10]
PURPOSE
Compare global site
performance
Progress towards
completion
Improve performance,
provide estimating data
Calculate bonus
Efficiency of labour
utilisation
METHOD
FREQUENCY
Earned value
Project end
Measured outputs
Measure productivity in
significant activities
Measure output of each
gang in every activity
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Weekly
21
3. 2 (])ata Co([ection
Data collection is a major task, especially on a large construction project. There are
many ways for collecting productivity data in the field. They range from careful
observation of the work by an observer to using record devices such as cam-corders
and cameras. Work-sampling and stop-watch studies may also be appropriate for
some tasks.
Nobody especially site personnel like paper work. So data collection forms must be
kept simple.
In the second chapter productivity was defined as the ratio of input to the output.
Therefore inputs and outputs need to be measured. In addition to measurement of
these two sources combining the productivities in different activities is necessary for
an effective measurement.
Productivity data is useful for a contractor from many aspects. They can be used
to[ 4]:
22
Or
Productive time
Unproductive time
expressed as the number of bricks laid or it can be amount of concrete poured. These
kinds of outputs are easy to measure. However activities like placing bars and
formwork are not that easy to measure at fixed intervals. Completion of a panel is not
always obvious and measured when the concrete is poured . Kinds of bars have many
different diameters.
23
Before installation of the camera it must be clearly explained to the workers that the
camera is only for the purpose of studying, analyzing and improving the work. The
operations which are going to be recorded must be determined before setting up.
Project superintendent, area supervisors should be involved in the selection of
operations to be taped and analyzed. After confirmation the foremen and crews should
also be notified.
When the activity is recorded it can be then viewed for extracting the most relevant
data to improving productivity. The tape can be shown to superintendents, foremen
and lead craft persons for analysis and recommendations. A report is then prepared,
summarizing all findings and final recommendations.[24]
3. 3 Pareto Jl na{ysis
Pareto analysis is named after an Italian economist who set the 80/20 rule. That means
80 percent of the results come from 20 percent of the effort. This rule is a
generalization and a useful tool for productivity analysis because it focuses on the
most important issues of a problem.[2]
Divide the cumulative percentage column into three groups, say 70 percent, 20
percent and 10 percent. Name them A,B,C in order.
24
Item no:
Item
group
1 A
2 A
3 B
4 B
5 c
6 c
7 c
8 c
9 c
10 c
Total
Usage
%
Cost
40.0
60000
29.4
44000
22000
14.7
15000
10.0
5000
3.4
2000
1.3
1000
0.7
500
0.3
250
0.1
250
0.1
150000
100.0
Cumulative%
Items
%
40.0
69.4
84.1
94.1
97.5
98.8
99.5
99.8
99.9
100.0
100.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cumulative
%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100
Summary
%of
cost
A
69.4
B
24.7
c
5.9
Total
100
Table 3.2 Pareto Analysis[2]
Stock grou~
%of items
20.0
20.0
60.0
100.0
Thus similar activities can be put in one group and the maximum number of activities
in which productivity needs to be measured can normally be reduced to less than 10
percent of the total activities.
3.4 WorftStudy
'Work study is the systematic study of work systems for the purposes offinding and
standardizing the least-cost method, determining standard times, and assisting in
training in the preferred method A work study is sometimes called a time-and-motion
study. '[19}
Work study is normallly used in an attempt to increase output from a given quantity
of resources. This is done by analysing ongoing operations, processes and work
methods.
25
There are typically two main parts in a work study. [19] These are:
Method Study
Work Measurement
Method study is the method used to find the preferred method of doing the work.
Work measurement is used to determine the standard time to perform a specific task.
Figure shows the relationship between these two.
PROCESS STUDY
FIELD RATINGS
ACTIVITY SAMPLING
TIME-LAPSE
PHOTOGRAPHY
26
Method study (some~imes called motion study) is the systematic recording and critical
examination of existing and proposed ways of doing work in order to develop and
apply easier and more effective methods and to reduce costs. [2] Method study was
first introduced in the industrial engineering field. The objective of method study is
to determine the best possible way to perform an activity. The result of a method
study will likely be the development of optimum working procedures and conditions.
The methdod study was pioneered by Frank Gilbreth early in the 1900s.[30] He
introduced method study as an engineering and management technique. Frank
Gilbreth's well-known work in improving brick-laying in the construction trade is a
good example of his approach. From his start in the building industry, he observed
that workers developed their own ways of working and that no two used the same
method. In studying bricklayers, he noted that individuals did not always use the same
methods in the course of their work. These observations led him to seek one best way
to perform tasks.
He developed many improvements in brick-laying. He invented a scaffold which
permitted quick adjustment of the working platform. The
work~r,
would be at the most convenient level at all times. Additionally he placed a shelf for
the bricks and mortar, saving the effort required by the workman to bend down and
pick up each brick. He had the bricks stacked on wooden frames with. End of each
brick always was in the same position, so that the bricklayer no longer had to turn the
brick around and over to look for the best side to face outward. The bricks and mortar
were so placed on the scaffold that the brick-layer could pick up a brick with one hand
and mortar with the other. As a result of these and other improvements, he reduced
the number of motions made in laying a brick from 18 to 4 1/2. [30]
Various aspects of an activity are being investigated by method study which focuses
on human aspect in the activity. Method study is generally carried out for following
reasons[14]:
27
Record all the related facts about the present or proposed method.
Select the operation: Cost is the critical issue in selection of the operation to be
studied. Cost reduction is the main consideration here. The operations to be given
priority in selection-step are as follows[ I]:
Record the facts: It is necessary to get all the facts concerning the project to be
improved. There are various recording techniques which are listed in table 3.3.
28
Group
Charts
Technique
Outline process chart
Suitable situations
To understand the construction process and to find out
whether a detailed analysis is required
Diagrams
Models
Flow diagrams
String diagrams
Three-dimensional models
Examine the recorded facts: The recorded facts must be systematically examined.
This is done by asking questions. Basically five questions are asked for the
examination procedure. What? Where? When? Who? How? are the questions also
known as primary questions[6] Then the question 'Why' is asked following each
primary question.
Primary Questions
Purpose
Place
Sequence
Person
What is
achieved?
Is it necessary?
Why?
Where is it
done?
When is it
done?
Why then?
Secondary
Questions
What is the
alternative?
What should
be done?
Where else is
possible?
Where should
it be done?
Means
Alternatives
Who should
do it?
Develop an improved method: New ideas and creative thinking is needed for this
step. Construction staff from different backgrounds may be consulted at this phase of
29
method study. Their experience might present better alternatives. The brainstorming
techniques can assist this process.
Install the new method: Following the development of new method should be
carried out. It may be advisable to try the new method on a small of the works at first
in order to
Maintain the new method: Maintaining involves the monitoring and modifying the
new method in operation. Once the new method is installed, it should be checked and
results evaluated in order to:
Outline process chart: An outline process chart can be used to record a general
picture of a process. Only operation and inspection symbols are used. This
chart is useful at the initiation stage of an investigation.
Flow process chart: It is used to show the process in detail. The components in
an outline process chart are expanded.
30
Transportation
nspectionl
measuremert
I!~
Operation 8
inspection
nspectlonl
measurement
Inspect timber
on truck
Unload to
ground
length
888
Cut to length
Place in position
31
4m
50%
5m
Move to
m
10
bending bench
Stack waiting
bending
Store
Bending to
schedule
60%
40%
6m
10m
Stack waiting
fabrication
Store
10m
A crew balance chart consists of a series of vertical bars scaled against a time or
progress measure. The vertical bars on a crew balance chart are shown across the x-
32
axis with each bar representing an individual crew member. Hence, the more bars
shown, the more crew members present in working on the task. In addition the
individual crew member vertical bars are subdivided through shading and patterns to
show the specific
subtask~
Since each element of ti~e for each crew member is plotted to the same time scale,
the interrelationship of the various crew members and sub-tasks can be studied
through a comparison along any line parallel to the x-axis on the chart. Construction
field staff can rearrange task assignments among various members of the crew in
order to reduce or eliminate non-productive time and increase productivity.[27]
m standby/reposition
shovel slurry
CJdirect slurr;
D sandbag headwalls
taset pipe
Djoin pipes
81ift pipe
II hook pipe
Dwalt
Dgrade
o check grade
Dcut
Labol'tr #1
Laborer 1o!2
Laborer 3
Laborer #4
Cr~wMember
33
Elstandby/reposition
Bshcve! slurry
Ddirect slurry
osandbag headvlai!s
caset pipe
Ojoin pipes
l'lllift pipe
lilhook pipe
ow a it
Ograde
Glcheck grade
Ocut
Laoorer 42
LiJborer1P3
Opera lOr
crew Member
String Diagrams
This is a scale drawing or model on which a thread is used to trace and measure the
path of workers, materials or machines through operation. The purpose is to give a
picture of the paths taken those most frequently used and rearrange the location of
workplaces or paths to reduce the amount of work.
1181111111
34
Work measurement is the application of techniques, designed to establish the time for
a qualified worker to carry out a specific job at a defined level of performance[l3]
Work measurement is used to develop standards for:
Setting output standards for workers which can be used for control as well as
incentives
There are two most commonly used techniques for work measurement. These
are[l ][13]
1) Time Study
2) Work sampling
Workers do not like to be observed during the course of work. They may
misunderstand and derive criticism from management. So the aim and methods of
work measurement should be explained to the supervisors and workers.
35
Time study
IS
Frederick W. Taylor ad Frank Gilbreth in the early 20th century.[l ][30] This
method is concerned with data collection in the form of recording times and rates
of working. Time study involves:
To study a new job, or a job for which no reliable output figures exist
To inves#gate delays
Reliable data can only be collected from experienced work study practitioners
who are very scarce in the construction industry[ 1] The first step of a time study is
getting familiar with the work to be studied. The location, environmental
conditions, team sizes and materials should be known by the practitioner.
Sketches should be made of the layout of the workplace. The elements which are
going to be timed should be determined clearly so that breakpoints be
distinguished.
36
For accuracy of identification, each element will have a distinctive start and finish
known as break points. These should be easily recognised by eye or ear such
as[13].
-,
Record the elements and break points on the time study sheets
Rating: Rating is defined in BS313 8 as 'to assess the worker's rate of working
In order to assess the performance or rate of working, a rating scale has been
produced and 100 is given as standard rate. It is the rate of output which the
qualified worker will achieve under norms.
37
Description
Comparable
walking rate
kph
No activity
50
3,2
75
4,8
Rate
6,4
125
150
9,6
Basic time: This is the time for carrying out an element of work at standard
rating. The basic times are calculated by the following formula:
If his rate of working was 125, then the task would only take 12 minutes and basic
time is still 15 minutes.
38
Relaxation Allowances :The basic time does not include the time needed for
resting. Relaxation allowances can be divided into two categories. One is an
allowance for the personal needs such as drinking water, going to toilet. The other
one is allowance from fatigue. Both allowances are made by adding a percentage
to the basic time. There is an uncertainty to determine the percentage allowance of
fatigue for most of the construction works [6].
Standard time: Standard time is the total time in which a job should be done at
standard performance, and is the sum of the basic time and relaxation allowances.
Nature
Standard
Posture
Attention
Conditions
Effort
Monotony
Allowance
[%]
8%
2%
2-7%
2-7%
0-5%
0-8%
0-5%
0-5-10%
0-5%
0-70%
1%
1-10%
10-30%
30-50%
0-4%
0-5%
Description
Personal needs[toilet, drinking, washing] plus basic fatigue
Standing
Awkward bending
Very awkward[lying, stretching up]
Fairly fine to very exacting visual work
Fairly fine to very complex mental process or span of attention
Lighting: fair to inadequate
Ventilation: fair to dust or fumes to extreme conditions
Noise: quiet to intermittent or high pitched
Heat: temperate to 35 degrees at 95 percent humidity
Light: up to 5 kg lifts
Medium: up to 20 kg lifts
Heavy: up to 40 kg lifts
Very heavy: up to 50 kg lifts
Mental
Physical: tedious to very tedious
39
Study by:
Date:
Element
Opening check time
Started:
Rating
OT
915
90
6.7
Clean out
Measure
Talk to foreman
90
95
100
1.8
0.4
1.2
Measure
95
0.73
Cut timber
105
1.25
Re-check measure
100
0.25
Fetch timber
80
3.21
Adjust bandage on
thumb
IT
2.21
90
3.56
Measure
100
0.75
Cut timber
105
2.61
Total C/F
24.67
Finished:
Element
I No
Study
Sheet
Rating
Drill timber
105
OT
24.67
2.15
Fix screws
100
6.78
BIF
943
Total
33.6
40
Date
Operation Description:
Study no:
Sheet of
Notes:
% Relaxation
Basic
Total
Standard
Elements
times
PN
Coni'
times
Collect tools
6.03
10
26
7.60
Clean out
1.62
23
1.99
Measure
1.82
21
2.22
Discussion
1.20
16
Cut timber
4.05
10
27
5.14
Recheck measure
0.25
16
0.29
Fetch timber
2.57
20
38
3.55
Move
3.20
10
27
4.06
1.39
Drill timber
2.26
10
27
2.57
Fix supports
6.78
15
33
9.02
The percentage of
Observing and recording the construction operations for a whole day or week may
lead to detecting the exact performance of activity whether it is costly and takes
too much time. So doing a number of observations should give a picture of a
situation within an acceptable accuracy when work sampling is performed. It is
done at irregular intervals to avoid observing the activities at the same point in the
work cycle each time.
41
Compared to time study the practitioner does not necessarily have to be well
trained for the activity sampling. In setting up a work sampling exercise, the first
step is to decide on the various categories of works that are possible. The most
simple way is dividing work into two categories. One is 'working' the other one is
'idle'. During the observation, each worker is noted simply as working or not
working. Since a work period is normally made up of active work with short
breaks, the average derived from several counts will never show 100 percent
active time. On construction works it will normally be 60-80 percent depending
on the heaviness of the work and conditions. If the results are lower than average
figures then it means there is something wrong with the work. [13]
On a large site employing a large labour force, the work sampling technique is
useful for identifying weak points where more supervision or a more detailed
study needed.
Machine excavating
Machine travelling
E
T
Worker working
Worker resting
Machine breakdown
BD
Worker absent
N: Number of observations
P: Category Proportion
L: Limit of accuracy required
42
In the equation above P is the portion of the sample that is expected to have a
given characteristic. For example , if 10 tiles were found to be damaged out of a
sample of 100, the category proportion for damaged tiles would be 10%.
Ins
4%
Tools and
material
5%
Transport
5%
Travel
12%
43
Number
Number
Total
Clock
observed
observed
number
Percentage
time
working
idle
assigned
observed
8:30
50
32
90
91
61
8:50
9:20
10:05
48
52
45
53
248
35
30
28
25
150
90
90
90
90
92
91
81
86
58
63
62
68
62
10:30
Percentage
Total
Table 3.10 Field count recording and analysis sheet[l]
active
[activity rating] Remarks
Productivity rating is more complex than field rating. Its focus is on effectiveness.
Even the idle time appears to be very low after a field rating, the question of 'how
effective is the work?' still remains important. So for the productivity rating, the
work is divided into three elements such as, effective work, contributory work and
ineffective work.[6] Examples of productive, non-productive and contributory
activities for a bricklaying operation are listed on the tables 3.11, 3.12 and 3.13.
An example of work sampling observation done for productivity rating is also
given in table 3.14
44
Productive activities
Description
Spreading mortar
Fetching mortar
Fetching brick
Cutting brick
Laying brick
Filling joints
Relaxation
Waiting
Searching
Rework
Confused
Other work
45
Driving dumper
Operating mixer
Distributing bricks or
Mortar
Fetching
Cleaning
Reading drawings
The percentages of effective, contributory and idle times are used to calculate the
'labour utilization factor' [6]
46
Contract:
Time started:
Sheet No: 1 of 4
Time finished:
Date:
pbserver:
Location:
~ctivity Codes:
Notes:
Dismantling - 1
Carrying- 3
ldle-5
Erecting- 4
Cleaning- 2
Workers/Machines
Time
Round
Remarks
number
Smith
Jones
Francis
Albert
Peter
8:30
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
8:35
8:40
8:45
8:50
8:55
9:00
9:05
9:10
4
5
3
3
1
5
4
4
1
4
4
5
4
1
3
4
4
4
2
3
4
2
5
4
2
2
4
4
1
5
3
4
9:15
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
9:20
9:25
9:30
9:35
9:40
9:45
9.-50
9:55
10:00
10:05
2
2
3
3
1
4
4
5
4
1
4
5
4
3
4
5
4
2
2
1
5
4
5
3
4
1
3
5
3
4
2
4
1
5
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
3
,_
2
1
2
4
4
4
2
5
3
2
5
3
5
1
4
4
A work sampling study of crews can provide the necessary information to help
determine the corrective actions that are needed to improve the percentage of
direct work. However according to a study done by Randolph Thomas in 1992 on
several nuclear power plant constructions the assumption of increased directwork-time leads to better productivity is not correct at all. His conclusion is that
work sampling studies show how busy the crafts are and the results cannot be used
to predict labour productivity or to quantify inefficient work hours.[26]
47
is done as 'field rating' for quick appraisal of site productivity. On the other hand
'productivity rating' which involves a further stage of sophistication and detail is
an effective tool for productivity appraisal.
3.5 Conc{usion
Productivity
measurement
and
analysis
1s
important
for
productivity
Process charts give a clear picture of the activity being studied and method study
searches for better ways for more productivity. Time study is the method for
establishing standard times for specific type of work and can be used for multiple
purposes. Work sampling is not a direct measurement of productivity but it can be
used in productivity estimation.
48
CHAPTER4
Procfuctivjty Improvement
4.1 Introduction
In the previous chapter some useful techniques for productivity measurement and
analysis, commonly used in civil engineering environment, were discussed. Those
methods form the basis for planning and productivity improvement. In this chapter the
role of management and some productivity improvement models are going to be
discussed.
A typical project is composed of a series of activities. The project plan shows the
relationships between the various activities. Work durations are assigned to each
activity to enable the overall project duration to be determined.
Planning is all about coordinating the relevant data, involving all the parties in
decisions, and producing a summary of analysis for those who will need it during
construction as well as for control purposes.
49
Commonly used planning and scheduling techniques for construction projects are
PERT(Program Evaluation and Review Technique), CPM(Critical Path Method) and
GANTT charts.[6][21] PERT is generally used in R&D type of projects. CPM was
designed for construction projects and has been adopted by construction industry
since. The logic of both CPM and PERT are the same. Both of them are based on
network diagrams.[21]
4.2.1 Networks
Network is defined_as ' The arrangement of all activities in a project, arrayed in their
logical sequence and represented by arcs and nodes. All projects can be broken down
into a number of necessary activities. The detail required will decide the number of
activities for the project to be completed.
Two different type of representations in networks are AON[ Activity on the node] and
AOA(Activity on arrow).[1][21] For both techniques arrows and nodes are used to
show activities and events . Activities are represented in nodes and arrows show the
precedence of the activities. This arrangement [network] defines the project and the
activity precedence relationships.
Networks are usually drawn starting on the left and proceeding to the right.
Arrowheads placed on the arcs are used to indicate the direction of flow. [21]
50
The principal component on the AOA system is the arrow which represents the
activity. The direction of the arrow shows the direction of the flow. The tail at the
arrow represents the starting point for a particular activity. The head represents the
completion point. At each arrow there is an event that takes place. It is also called a
node.
All networks are constructed on the principle of dependency. There are predecessor
activities which must precede before an event takes place.
Defining activities
51
---w ,
Start Ewlll
0 0
~ e..enllinM
+ + t Fi~ E~
LnTJ
Ac1iYdy
@
7 "f
After determining the critical path the float times of other activities are determined. It
will be useful to see the float times for adjusting resources. The projects can be
classified into two categories as 'time limited' and 'resource limited'.
If the resources for the activities can be made available to suit the earliest or latest
activity time without affecting the project duration then the project is called timelimited. However in practice, resources cannot be provided instantly. As being the
subject of this dissertation and a most prominent resource for construction activities,
labour requirements should be adjusted for the whole project duration. Recruitment
and dismissal of workers for short durations is not a desirable solution for the
contractors. For example if a limit of five workers were imposed then the end date of
the project would have to be extended.
52
In a Gantt chart, each task is shown on a row. Dates run along the top in increments of
days, weeks or months, depending on the total length of the project. The expected
time for each task is represented by a horizontal bar whose left end marks the
expected beginning of the task and whose right end marks the expected completion
date.
Tasks may run sequentially, in parallel or overlapping. As the project progresses, the
chart is updated by filling in the bars to a length proportional to the fraction of work
that has been accomplished on the task. This way, one can get a quick reading of
project progress by drawing a vertical line through the chart at the current date.
Completed tasks lie to the left of the line and are completely filled in. Current tasks
cross the line and are behind schedule if their filled-in section is to the left of the line
and ahead of schedule if the filled-in section stops to the right of the line. Future tasks
lie completely to the right of the line. In constructing a Gantt chart, keep the tasks to a
manageable number (no more than 15 or 20) so that the chart fits on a single page.
More complex projects may require subordinate charts which shows the detail of the
timing of all the subtasks which make up one of the main tasks. For team projects, it
often helps to have an additional column containing numbers or initials which identify
who on the team is responsible for the task.
Often the project has important events which you would like to appear on the project
timeline, but which are not tasks. For example, you may wish to highlight when a
prototype is complete or the date of a design review. You enter these on a Gantt chart
as "milestone" events and mark them with a special symbol, often an upside-down
triangle. [6][21]
53
Aetlviry
Do~tis:>ti<ln
A - Pr..,are statts
RINII~
TitM ldovsl
05
15
10
2<)
25
35 40 45
60
55
60
&5
7()
75
c (:Ot\C(a~ shit)
!ZZZ !21
IZZZ ~
IZ
J E!Mfnal ftc4de
J( -GWint
l. BlOck inlttnal wafts
M Timber frem.. end o"l'llnil'
N P~bino - I t t
t:J
IZ ~
fZZ
IZi'
II ~13
122:-l
121
ez ~
1Zl
IZl
P s.Mco dvets
'ill
T Corns.Qte rittlnD
\J . btNN pm.rinQ.
\I CWJ>et 0$
Suoerviaion
~
Hammock
Slr.o fat!il<ti..,
Method of construction
Quantity of work
Crew size
54
There are different method alternatives for a particular type of work. For example, a
formwork operation can be done by using job forms built on site, pre-built ones or
steel-ply forms. Labour productivity will depend on what work method the contractor
selects.
So
estimations. [ 15]
Then the amount of work to be performed is estimated. Construction drawings are the
main source to calculate the amount of work. The calculated quantity is usually
entered on an estimating sheet. The next step is to find the required man-hours for the
corresponding quantity of work. Cumulative productivity estimations from previous
projects and experiences are generally used to calculate the man-hours.
In table 4.1 man-hours needed for 5000 m2 of concrete wall formwork is calculated.
= 5000 m2
=10 man-hours/1 0 m2
Required man-hours
=5000 m
,
x 1O[mh]/1 0 m
= 5000 man-hours
Having obtained man-hours, the crew size and workdays can be decided. Different
alternatives for crew size with different durations are considered to make a decision as
seen on table 4.2. Having decided the crew size, the corresponding duration can be
used to calculate a cost estimate for the formwork and an overall project schedule.
Size of crew Resulting duration Resulting duration
{hours}
{weeks}
Possible crews:
Selected crew:
625
15,6
10
500
12,5
12
416
10,4
10
500
12,5
55
In the table 4.2 it is assumed that the contractor has decided to use 10 craftsmen to do
the forming operation. Suppose that the average wage rate for each craftsman is R120.
Given this per-craftsman cost per hour and the duration calculated in the table, the
labour cost for the formwork can be estimated as in table 4.3.
500 hours
R120/hour
duration[hours]craftsman
number of craftsman
500hoursxR 120/hourx1 0
R 600 000
rate/hour
Table 4.3 Calculation oflabour costs for concrete wall formwork [15]
environment,
changing
conditions,
project
uniqueness,
industry's
56
Estimates
Estimated amount of work: 50 000 square feet contact area
Estimated productivity: 1Oman-hours/1 00 square feet
Estimated man-hours: 5000
Project Data:
1250 man-hours to date= 25% of estimated hours
20% of work performed[10 000 square feet]
Project Cost Overrun
20% of work makes 1250 hours then 100% ofwork will be
completed in 6250 hours
Project hours=
6250
Estimated hours=
5000
Estimated overrun in hours= 1250
Table 4.4 Cost control calculations [15]
In table 4.4 it is assumed that labour hours are proportional to the wall formwork
performed and it appears that there is a noticeable cost overrun. The management
should be notified of such overruns. An early detection of cost overruns can prevent
the project to go out of control and enables the inefficiencies to be tracked and
stopped.
Comparison of actual costs with estimated costs does not always serve as an indicator
to performance. I?xcessive overtime labour costs may be hidden by higher
productivity. When a bricklayer works with overtime at a higher productivity rate
than normal, the unit cost, calculated for each brick, may appear same as the unit
cost of the brick which is laid at a normal rate without overtime.
57
Project quality will influence the success of the project. Quality involves completing
the task correctly to meet the specifications. If a quality product is to be the aimed
then in order to achieve it efficiently the task must be performed correctly the first
time. Pride of workmanship in producing a quality product can also contribute
positively to project success[31].
The designers, planners and management of a project must be aware of the fact that
this function alone can determine more than any other quality of the product. The
planners
enough competent tradespeople to be on the site at the required time with the correct
tools and adequate material to produce a quality product.
58
reflect~d
A sample of foreman delay survey is given in table 4.5. Different kinds of problems
causing delays are listed . The list can be different from project to project. The
foreman is expected to fill this form but a qualified person acquainted with the work
can fill it out as well. The form is filled at the end of each working day but on large
projects it is usuallf not necessary to run the survey daily over a long period. The
number of hours and the number of workers involved in each delay is recorded. The
forms are collected each day and the tabulated results are returned to the foreman
along with summary reports at planned intervals. Some advantages of a foreman delay
survey are(4]:
59
Supervisor:
Number in team:
Number of Number o Total
man hours
hours lost men
lost
After collection of data over a sufficient period of time, the data is summarised and
percentage of delays are tabulated. It can be shown on a pie chart as well. The
summary results should be discussed with the foremen participated in the survey to
identify the causes of delays. Then the management should take necessary actions
accordingly. By effective planning and application of method study techniques,
further productivity improvements can be achieved. A subsequent foreman delay
survey should indicate whether the corrective actions have proven effective or not.
60
Project:
Supervisor area:
r:-
+-'
Q)
r:-
::J
(/)
.Q..
co
ow
(/)
Q)
c.
....
+-'
co
.2
c
co
.J::
u
Q)
~
(!)
....
Ol
c
c
:p
"ffi
a..
0
~
Q)
....J
~
w
(.)
f2
w
c..
Q)
+-'
(/)
PERCENTAGE
61
0:::
4. 6 Conc[usion
In order to meet the productivity targets for a project it is necessary to start the
productivity improve in planning stage. Well prepared plans minimize the losses in
time as well as other 'resources.
The need for cost control for a construction project is obvious. Changing physical
environment, changing conditions, project uniqueness, industry's dependence on
labour productivity introduce uncertainty into project plans and estimates. Early
diagnose of inefficiencies and deviations from planned progress are necessary for
recovery and corrective action.
The foreman delay survey is a tool that can be used to detect productivity problems in
construction aiming to determine the effect of factors outside the foreman's control
such as lack of equipment and delivery delays.
62
CHAPTER 5
Jfuman
:M_otivation
5.1 I ntrocfuction
It is very common in construction industry that there are barriers and a distance
between management and workers. The main reason for this can be that most of the
workers are viewed as working for a job rather than a firm. A worker who worked for
a project is most likely to look for another contractor for employment when the
project is completed. This seems to be a reason for the weak bonds between the
individual worker and contractor firm. The management objective here should be to
establish strong links with the workers. Management is a crucial factor to productivity
improvement. Worker motivation is an important part of management. Most of the
burden lies on the shoulders of construction managers for this task. [15] [34]
63
a project may be optimized by having enough workers and that the costs will be
minimized by not having too many workers.
Increase in the size of labour force is likely to reduce the productivity. The amount of
the reduction depends on whether the increase is planned or unplanned. Productivity
on big sites is lower than productivity on little ones. An increase in the size of the
labour force of 200 percent leads to a loss of productivity of more than 15 percent
even it is planned. On the other hand an unplanned increase in labour force of 100
percent may result loss of productivity of30 percent.[10]
Personnel selection methods should be based on the needs of the job. The contractor
should have a method for objectively evaluating his personnel against the
requirements of the job at the beginning of the project. The selection methods will be
based on the individual's skills and experience. A means for getting client input and
acceptance on the selection of key project personnel is required. The method should
also contain provisions for ongoing review and upgrading of personnel requirements
and qualifications throughout the project.
Personnel Rules
Management is responsible for developing rules to manage the actions and managing
all personnel on the job. Management also has the responsibility of communicating
these rules clearly and effectively to the work force.
When a worker agrees to work with a company he accepts to comply with the rules.
However he will not generally tolerate it if the rules lack of wisdom or show
weaknesses and may try to find employment elsewhere. Every worker wants to be
treated fairly and does not expect to get better treatment than others. For example if
one person is late for work because of a car breakdown and excused by management,
64
other workers may also expect to receive the same treatment when faced with such
situation. [5]
Maintaining loyalty from team members by being fair and treating evenly
without any discrimination.
A major survey of ~anagers at all levels revealed that their biggest problem is people.
This includes handling conflict, motivating staff, influencing people and just getting
people to do what they must do. Working with people is one of the toughest
demands.[35]
The unique demands from a project manager concern seven areas [21]:
Negotiating
65
Being the subject of this dissertation, the project team is also under the responsibility
of project manager. Two important the demands from a project manager is motivating
the team members and communicating with them.
5.4 Communication
The works in construction projects are mostly detailed and non-repetitive. This makes
communication necessary. A project manager must be able to communicate
effectively between both workers and owners. Effective communication and good
'
There are different ways of communications that take place in a construction project.
It can be via telephone calls, posters and letters. A weekly meeting in which a project
manager discusses the progress with engineers and foremen is another typical form of
communication. Personal or group interests can also produce a type of
communication. For example when workers expect the end of a project they may start
to discuss among themselves the possibility oflayoffs.[15]
66
Sender
Receiver
The 'open door policy' and 'walking the job' are two powerful tools for good
communication and motivation as well. An open door policy is a policy in which the
manager's office door is open to all of the employees and he is willing to listen and
solve their problems. There are also many benefits of 'walking the job'. There is a
danger of workers feeling lowered due to the nature of work
~hey
can be a barrier for productivity. If a manager walks out of his office and show his
presence in the field, talk to the workers personally in a friendly and balanced manner
then they will feel comfortable and respected. This can result in increased
productivity as well. [5]
67
honouring the person's name who saved time on the schedule. There were shift
change meetings everyday in which leaving shift members informed the coming shift
about the progress. Meetings were held daily to discuss the progress and to make the
plans for the next two days. People showed great enthusiasm and contributed with
their ideas to save. time on project. The result was amazing. The project was
completed only in 25 days with a saving of $21 million out of a $85 million budget.
[21]
5. 5 ?dotivation rtlieories
There are several approaches utilized by the construction industry for motivation of
workers. In the field of behavioural science some theories were established to analyze
the goals of individual workers, how that worker behaves in a group, and how a group
acts in an organization.[4][15]
Supervision
68
Interpersonal relationships
Working conditions
Salary
Status
Security
Achievement
Recognition of achievement
Responsibility
5. 6 Safety 9vtanagement
Following the mining industry the construction industry has the second worst severity
and injury rate. In other words a construction worker is in a state of high physical risk.
Workers tend to protect themselves at a less-than-optimal productivity rate. Various
work rules may reduce the risk of accidents while constraining productivity. On the
other hand if an accident happens the negative effect on productivity is huge. Worker
morale decreases such that productivity rates drop noticeably for extended
periods. [ 15]
69
Everyone connected with a construction project should be concerned with the level of
safety that is maintained on it. Job site safety influences productivity and morale
which in tum can determine whether the project will be completed successfully or not.
As a minimum, the level of safety on a project must comply with legislated criteria.
[4]
There are many factors that contribute to a safe project. The following points are
indicators of the level of safety that a project may experience. [31]
Safety in Design
There should be opportunity for both workers and supervisors to obtain safety training
on an ongoing basis as well as have access to proper safety equipment.
Management Support
Senior management should take an active participatory role in the safety of company
projects. Participation in safety committees, training and meetings should occur. It is
management's job to assign responsibilities for safety, and this should be clear.
70
Safety Training
New personnel orientation, weekly or monthly safety meetings, toolbox meetings,
safety committees and safety courses are all indicators of an organization's
commitment to safety training.
Maintenance Program
Preventative maintenance on tools and equipment involving records and logs should
occur. Workers should be made aware of the dangers of working with defective tools
and encouraged to report and flag these problems.
Emergency Preparedness
All project personnel must be able to contact emergency aid and find emergency
equipment. An adequate number of first aid trained employees must be on the job site
and drills or simulations conducted to ensure preparedness.
5. 7 Conc{usion
In this chapter the relationship between management and individual worker has been
discussed. The selection and motivation of a worker and manager's approach to him
has been focused on. Workers expect to be treated fairly and they are motivated when
esteemed.
should be met to maintain a safe work environment. The theories which were
developed to understand the behaviour and reactions of workers have also explained.
71
CHAPTER6
Jl Case Study On Productivity
Improvement
6.1 Introduction
In this chapter a civil engineering case study will be evaluated in terms of
productivity. The focus is going to be on the bricklaying operation. Measurements and
analysis are going to be performed regarding bricklaying.
The project which is the subject of this study is the construction of a 'health spa'
situated in Fourways- Johannesburg. The contractor is Group Five. The construction
started in March 2004 and is scheduled to be completed at the end of July 2004. The
concreting operations of first two floors were completed and the bricklaying activities
were under way on the ground floor while the observations were made.
The reason for selecting the bricklaying operation for the study is that it is a repetitive
work throughout the whole construction process which is labour intensive.
Some of the tools discussed previously for productivity improvement in chapters 3,4
and 5 will be utilized in running the case study. These tools include:
Time study
Work sampling
Method Study
72
blockB
block A
:brb
~
(bridm
J
:brb
6. 2 crime Study
Before carrying out the time study a general observation was made by author to
determine the elements of the operation and to plan for data collection. Once the
initial observation had been made the equipment and data collection forms were
prepared. The equipment used in the study was a stopwatch, a study board, pencil and
a calculator. A layout of the construction site was also maintained and the working
conditions were noted such as weather, temperature and site conditions. (Figure 6.1
and table 6.1)
73
74
Before recording, the purpose of the study was explained to the workers and during
recording, the readings and ratings were discussed with foreman. The actual observed
times were recorded and the ratings were given for each worker by using table 3.5 and
observation ofworke(s performance as explained in section 3.4.2.l.(Chapter 3). They
were tabulated as seen on table 6.2
Upon the completion of on-site data collection the forms were studied and standard
times were established by adding time allowances.
TIME STUDY OBSERVATION SHEET
Team: A,B,C,D,E bricklayers G,F labourers
BT
CT OT
'min) l(min) 'min)
R
ELEMENTS
Start time
0
3,2
A,B,C align the profile 100
9,6
3,2
IT
D,E wait
3,2
3,2
100
F fetch brick
3,2
100
G fetch mortar
3,2
3,2
100
3
A,B align the string
6
CT
OT
It min) 'min) BT (min)
11,5
2
IT
2
4
100
2
1,8
90
2
13,7
100
~5
D,E wait
C measure
F fetch brick
G distribute brick
IT
90
100
100
2,7
3
3
100
100
IT
100
90
100
90
2
2
2
9
2
1,8
1oo
3
3
3
'
ELEMENTS
Start time
A,B,Cwait
D,E lay brick
F fetch brick
Gwait
6,2
90
90
IT
5
2,5
2,5
IT
90
2,3
2,3
2,3
6,9
1,5
1,5
1,5
7,5
1,35
16
2,07
18,5
2
2
2
5,4
1,8
100
90
IT
10,2
20
A,B,C,D lay brick
100
4,05
E wait
IT
1,5
1,5
F Distribute bricks
100
1,5
1,5
Gwait
IT
A,B wait
IT
1,5
90
1,5
F fetch brick
100
G fetch mortar
100
11,7
2,5
2,5
2,5
2,5
16,2
8,2
A,B,C,D,E lay brick
F fetch brick
Gwait
24
75
After the observations and completion of time study observation sheet a time study
abstract sheet was' prepared by adding all the basic times on time study observation
sheet for each activity. Then total basic time is calculated. The actual amount of
bricks laid during the period of time study was 2m 2 The unit basic time is calculated
as per square meter. Bence total basic time is divided by two.
Fetch mortar
Fetch brick
Measure
Align the profile
Lay brick
Distribute bricks
Distribute mortar
Align string
3,2 1,5
3,2 3
Unit BT(min)
4,7
2,35
1,8
Total BT(min)
7,55
2,7 2,5
5,2
2,6
9,6
9,6
4,8
53,35
26,675
10,42
5,21
4,3
11
2,15
5,5
5,4
4,05 4,5
2,07 4
6,9 7,5 16
1,35
1,8 2,5
6
5
A table for relaxation allowances was prepared similar to the table 3.8. The
percentages for allowances were determined by considering the nature of each
activity.
RELAXATION ALLOWANCES
Operation: Bricklaying
Date:
07.06.2004
Total%
Standard times
[min/m2]
>.
()
% Relaxation
c:
Q)
0>
Ill
ro
c:
ELEMENTS
Fetch mortar
Fetch brick
Measure
Align the profile
Lay brick
Distribute bricks
Distribute mortar
Align string
c:
>. :PQ)
c: c: ()
.9 0 c:
Ill
Ill
Q)
::I
......
c:
c:
a..
:p
c:
:0
c:
~ o~=
ro
(.)
u ro
c:
2,35
10
26
2,96
7,55
10
26
9,51
2,6
18
3,07
4,8
19
5,71
26,67
26
33,60
5,21
19
6,20
2,15
19
2,56
5,5
17
6,44
76
6.3 WorftSampfing
Work sampling is a technique that can be used economically and effectively to study
productivity on construction projects(section 3.4.2.2). In this project it is applied to a
bricklaying team. W o'rker status was evaluated in five different forms as:
Bricklaying
Carry bricks
Carry mortar
Idle
Measure and align
Work study was done during a normal workday with 10 minutes intervals and it was
tabulated as shown in table 6.6. The 49 readings taken between 7:00 and 8:00 were
used as pilot study to determine the sample size. The proportion for each activity then
determined as shown in table 6.5. The following calculations were done as given in
chapter 3.
The equation used to determine the sample size for a specific accuracy given in
chapter 3 is as follows:
2
N=4P[l-P]IL
......................................................................... (6.1)
N: number of observations
P: percent working
L: sampling error
Once the data from the pilot study had been collected, the size of the sample for 95 %
accuracy was calculated as:
N=4
N=396 observations
The largest category proportion is 45%, soP is taken as 0,45
Element
Bricklaying
Carry bricks
Carry mortar
Idle
Measure & align
Total
Element count
Proportion %
22
45
12
10
24
5
12
4
49
100
'7'7
HEALTH SPA
loate
Job description:
Brickwork
Time finished:l17:00
11006.2004
Fourwavs!Johannesburc
Location:
conditions:
Site
Activity Codes: 1 Bricklaying 2 Carrying bricks 3 Carrying Weather: Sunny Cool
Mortar 4 Idle 5 MeasurinQ&Aiignin
Labourers Remarks
Time
Brickla ers
07:00
A
5
07:10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
07:20
07:30
3
4
5
6
7
07:40
07:50
08:00
1
5
4
5
1
4
1
1
5
1
2
2
2
3
4
3
8
9
08:10
08:20
1
5
1
4
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
4
2
2
3
3
10
08:30
11
12
13
08:40
08:50
14
15
16
Round No
17
18
1
4
D
4
G
3
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
4
2
4
3
09:20
1
1
4
1
5
4
4
09:30
09:40
2
2
3
4
09:50
10:00
1
4
1
1
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
21
1
1
5
1
1
1
3
4
3
22
23
10:50
11:00
1
1
1
4
4
1
4
1
1
4
2
2
3
4
24
25
26
11:10
11:20
11:30
4
5
4
1
4
4
1
4
4
1
4
2
2
2
3
3
27
11:40
28
11:50
12:00
1
4
1
4
1
1
12:10
12:40
1
4
1
4
1
1
4
1
4
1
1
34
12:50
13:00
13:10
1
1
4
1
1
35
36
37
13:20
13:30
13:40
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
38
39
13:50
14:00
1
4
4
4
1
4
29
30
31
32
33
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
14:10
14:20
14:30
14:40
1
1
1
4
14:50
15:00
4
1
1
1
1
5
5
1
1
15:10
15:20
15:30
5
1
1
1
4
1
15:40
15:50
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
3
1
5
2
4
3
4
3
5
1
2
2
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
1
1
1
5
1
4
5
4
1
2
2
1
4
1
5
5
1
2
2
2
1
5
1
1
4
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
5
1
5
5
16:00
16:10
16:20
54
16:30
55
56
16:40
16:50
1
4
1
57
17:00
1
4
5
4
52
53
5
1
5
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
10:10
10:20
10:30
10:40
19
20
Average
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
4
4
4
4
2
2
3
3
78
Operation
Bricklaying
Carry bricks
Carry mortar
Idle
Measure & align
Total
Frequency
166
48
46
97
42
399
Accuracy
Percentage of total P [L]
41,6
4,9
12
3,3
11,5
3,2
24,3
4,3
10,6
3
100,0
Maximum
Minimum[%] [%]
36,7
46,5
8,7
15,3
8,3
14,7
20
28,6
7,6
13,6
A work sampling summary table is prepared as seen in table 6. 7 and the percentages
of effective, contributory and idle times are used to calculate the 'labour utilization
factor'[6]
= (166 + 0,25 X
136) I 399
The foreman delay survey is a tool that can be used to detect productivity problems in
construction. It aims to determine the factors that cause the delays and unproductive
works.[4]
The survey in the current case study was conducted on 5 consecutive days over the
bricklaying team . The survey form which was filled out on the first day is given as
79
6.8. Delays more than 10 minutes are counted for each activity on the list and were
reflected on foreman delay survey at the end of the day. By adding up all the data
collected over 5 days a foreman delay summary form is prepared as shown in table
6.9
Foreman: David
Number in team: 7
0,4
1,2
0,7
2,8
0,2
0,6
0,2
0,8
0,2
0,4
0,2
0,6
0,25
0,8
Comments
80
June
0)
0)
:;..
co
32
u
c:
1.0
N
N
(J)
Man hours
3,5
co
c:::
w
a.
8
1.0
...-
~
w
()
_.
0..
U)
;::
C)
:.e0
C"')
4,5
1,43
3,9
3,9
1,24
14,5
14,5 4,6
3,5
3,5
1,11
3,2
1,02
1,59
2,5
1,1
3,6
1,14
0,4
0,4
0,8
0,25
1,6
0,3
1,9
0,6
1,4
0,4
1,8
0,57
2,8
3,8
1,21
TOTAL
42,3 4,2
PERCENTAGE
13,4 1,33
46,5 14,8
Each workers works 9 hours a day. Total manhours for 5 bricklayers for 5 days is:
5x5x9 = 225
Total manhours for 2 labourers is:
2x5x9 = 90
As seen from in table 6.9 the biggest proportion is 14,5 which is caused by 'waiting
for bricks' . Taking this information into account a method study is carried out on
transportation of bricks.
81
6. 5 JvletliodStudy
Method study is the systematic recording and critical examination of existing and
proposed ways of doing work in order to develop and apply easier and more effective
methods and to reduce costs. [2] The steps to perform method study were explained in
chapter 3 and are going to be utilized on the current case study.
Step 1: Selection
The activities of brick movement were selected to be analysed by the method study.
The bricks are carried to blocks by wheelbarrows. The wheelbarrow used for bricks is
the same type is used for mortar. The purpose is to investigate the movements of
wheelbarrows transporting bricks from storage area to the blocks.
Step 2: Recording
The operation was studied using a string diagram[!] drawn on a scale plan of the
area. Wheelbarrow paths are shown on the plan in figure 6.2 .
Where? When? Who? How? are the questions also known as primary questions[6]
Then the question 'Why' is asked following each primary question.
Once the operation has been recorded, activity is subjected to a systematic and
progressive series of questions. The questioning process is tabulated in table 3.4.
82
813
I
B14
I
81
83
82
84
85
87
86
88
89
810
811
815
1 A15
A1
,812
816
A16 A171
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
AS
A9
A10
A11
A12
A13
A181
A2
kem
A14
/A19
'A20
/
briclm
'
kem
Figure 6.2 String Diagram of brick transportation [initial configuration]
Place Where is it done? Loading at the brick storage area and carrying to
the walls to be built. Why there? The construction is surrounded by roads
and it is the only appropriate area. Where else could it be done? Close to
the construction site. Where should it be? There is alternatively a small
space for storing bricks on the opposite comer of the current brick storage
area.
83
Person Who does it? The worker who was assigned for the task. Why
him? He is the one assigned for that work. Who else could do it? When the
worker is absent the other worker who was assigned for carrying mortar
can do it. Who should do it? The one assigned for bricks.
The questioning process includes some unnecessary questions as well. That is for not
to miss any point, but some of the questions can be ignored.
Step 4 : Develop
As identified in step 3, the possibility of an additional brick storage area was
considered and a diagram was developed for this arrangement as seen in figure 6.3.
Considering the distance savings and the utilisation of a new trolley, the possible
outcomes of the new method were evaluated.
The total number of bricks to be laid for the ground floor was estimated as 96200.
The number of bricks that a standard wheelbarrow can carry at one time is 30
The number of bricks that a specially designed trolley can carry at one time is 40
The required rounds with a wheelbarrow= 96200 I 30 = 3207
84
So using a trolley proves to be more efficient as it will reduce the number of rounds
from 3207 to 2405 for ground floor
813
814
81
83
82
84
85
87
86
88
89
810
811
815
1 A15
A1
812
816
A16 A171
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
AS
A9
A10
A11
A12
A13
A181
A2
kem
A14
/A19
'A20
......,
bricks
'
...1
'
kem
Figure 6.3 String Diagram of brick transportation [proposed configuration]
With the proposed configuration a new brick storage area is introduced to carry the
bricks to the destination points as shown on figure 6.3. The distance savings from
brick transportation is tabulated in table 6.11 using approximate distances between the
points and brick storage area. The main cause for delay was detected as 'waiting for
bricks' by foreman delay survey. This new configuration can minimize delays and
result an increase the number of bricks laid per hour.
85
A1
24
4
A3
28
A4
8
AS
32
A6
12
A?
35
A8
16
A15
22
A16
14
A17
6
TOTAL
Table 6.10 Distance Savings
A2
47
47
43
43
39
39
35
35
42
27
42
23
43
15
35
7
27
0
19
20
13
36
238
6. 6 Conc{usion
A civil engineering case study is discussed and evaluated in this chapter in terms of
productivity. Some of the tools discussed previously for productivity improvement in
chapters 3,4 and 5 are utilized in running the case study. Foreman delay surveys
helped to detect the causes of delays. Considering the causes of delays method study
tool is utilized and a proposed configuration of brick transportation is formed.
86
CHAPTER 7
Concfusions ana CJ?s,commenations
7.1 Summary of rJ/ie Literature Study
mea~ure
productivity in construction projects. Process charts give a clear picture of the activity
being studied and method study searches for better ways for more productivity. Time
study is the method for establishing standard times for specific type of work and can
be used for multi-purposes. Work sampling is not a direct measurement of
productivity but it can be used in productivity estimation.[4][[6]
Working overtime
87
Lack of communication
The areas that management should focus on to increase productivity can be classified
as:
Planning
Quality
Motivation
Communication
Safety
The specific activity which was studied is bricklaying. The reason for selecting the
bricklaying is:
Some of the tools explained in this research are utilised in case study. These tools are:
Time study
Work sampling
Method study
88
Time study is performed to determine the standard times for the bricklaying
operation. The data derived from time study serves as a criterion for rest of the
construction.
Work sampling observations are done to provide a picture of activities and
productivity status. The data collected from work sampling is used to determine the
labour utilisation. It was calculated as 50% showing the potential for productivity
improvement.
After obtaining the labour utilisation factor, foreman delay surveys were implemented
to detect the causes of low productivity. It was found that the bricklayers' work was
interrupted due to waiting for bricks. The problem might have been overcome by
adding an extra labourer for carrying bricks but to solve this problem in a cost
efficient way, a method study was conducted. The results of method study can be
summarized as:
The following may be concluded and inferred from the literature and case study:
89
Project manager is the most responsible for productivity. He should ensure and
maintain the participation and motivation of team members. He should
maintain loyalty from team members by being fair and treating evenly with an
open door policy. A friendly environment in which the barriers between
management and workers were removed, will result in better productivity. It
is important to start a dialogue between workers and management early at the
beginning of the project to detect the difficulties, problems and failures at the
first time. Strong communication links between project members and units are
necessary for a desired level of productivity achievement. Weekly meetings
should be organised in which all the responsible staff participate .
.
'
From both literature and case study, it can be concluded that productivity can be
improved at almost all levels of a construction project. For further research the factors
that have significant impact on productivity should be analysed in detail. Productivity
of various civil engineering projects could be measured and comparisons could be
made to determine the areas in which productivity differs most and the areas which
have the potential to improve.
90
E&FN Spon
4) James J. O'Brien and Robert G. Zilly, 1991 Contractor's Management
Handbook, Me Graw Hill
5) Robert H. Warren, 1989, Motivation and Productivity In The Construction
Industry, Van Nostrand Reinhold
6) Roy Pilcher, 1992, Principles of Construction Management, Me Graw Hill
7) H. Randolph Thomas, Labour Productivity And Work Sampling: The Bottom
Line, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.117
No3 ,
91
Cambridge
University Press
19)Everett E. Adam, Jr. James C. Hershauer, 1981, William A. Ruch Productivity
and Quality, Measurement as a Basis for Improvement Prentice- Hall, Inc.,
New Jersey,
20) Harry Lampert, 1990, Productivity In The Construction Industry In The
Republic Of South Africa- A Holistic Approach to Resources Utilization, PhD
Thesis, Johannesburg, Wits Universtiy
21) Jack R. Meredith and Samuel J. Mantel, 2003, 5th Edition, Project
Management A Managerial Approach, John Wiley & Sons
22) David
Arditi,
Construction
Productivity
Improvement,
Journal
Of
92
32) A Kind Word For Theory X, Journal of Public Administration Research and
Theory, Vol 13, 2003
33) Michael Fielding, Changing Communication Needs, Productivity SA, NPI
May/June 1998
34) Rapidly Increasing Productivity and Living Standards, Productivity Focus
1997, NPI
35)Norman Kemp, Personal Productivity- Achieve Your Goals, Productivity SA,
NPI, November/December 1999
93
APPENDIX
Gantt charts
Construction site safety log sheet
94
COMPANY: ...................................................................
DATE
IDENTIFY
REPORT
NOTICED:
LOCATIONIITEM
ACTIVITY/SITUATION
UNSAFE ACT/CONDITION
YOUR NAME&
SUB-STANDARD SITUATION
DESIGNATION
'
ACKNOWLEDGE REPORT
WHAT ACTION TAKEN TO RECTIFY
SIGNATURE
DATE
----
Current
;_
j_
;:,tart
rmrsn
FMarch
22!1~
!~ ~~~~~~gg:;~~~~g: ..
I l!l
j! __~
1 __ 231
2004
,r
-
71
---C .~ -
:- -
INTALLATION
:~~-----
H~~G~~pz~~~ER
plaster
----
.. _____
Car~rt!Y
.
::
~~ ~:~~:~~gg:; ~~~g:~~gg:
....!:.
"
OJooHA'NooVIfR"o"Al'Es_________
.m
14/05/2004 i 17/0512004
1
2!.17io5}2004! 18/05/2004
2: 18/05/2004 : 19/05/2004
1 \ 24/05/2004 \ 24/05/2004
;
...
.
I
'
=-~!_26!!l~'2oo4 : o21o7t2oo4
~~d-t5:45:00
15June2004 -----------------~,-~-. _________
- = ~~-1.08c22 SitePtan Construction Planning System
't:,~.
C::b
~-
1
.. .
l1
'II
. . . :.!
'.~ ..1
R. .
ll\
1.'1
I!
FiB
j : !1
1J
J .,.
II
1
jl
..
1 1
.1'
. :1 .
1
'i
l I . . . :,. .
1 .....
I I
i. .
. : ......... :
:.
I .. .
'
1
~.
.
... 1
~
1 I
~~
1 ............. ......
'ilmD 1 :
........
. ...
L. II'
~ ...
:1
1
!
I
:j
....
'
. ....
. ' 1I
'
...... ,. .
i I
1
r
. .
'
Jl"\l
......... j
....
FB
! !l
1.
l'jI
~. I
. ~ ....
1
j
q;
.. d.il.-..
I ......
11/06/2004
3 :_Q~/O~j2004 1 11/06/2004
2 j.1 0/0~.~004 ~ 11/06/2004
3! 11/06/2004 115/06/2004
._ _ _ _
3ijei66/2004118/06/2004
5\21/06/2004! 25/06/2004
4: 23/06/2004 ' 28/06/2004
-~l~~io6(2004; 29/06/2004
1: ~0/06/2004 : 30/06/2004
I ' .J.
l'
Lj
'
!
1
3j~4/..Q6./2004i.08/06/2004
3\ 07/06{?004! 09/06/2004
4!08/06~?004
....
2!
KOO()EXTERNAL WORKS
- -------+_-1=9C_Q~06/2004 ! 30/06/2004
~010 PARKING & FENCING __ _ ___
19\ 0_4106/2004 i 30/06/2004
'J:<020 ClearArea&Fenceline______
!<030 Fonn levels
__ __
J:<040_1:ectFence
_ _ ___
~050 ~~_Q.ut for la}lerwori<.s _ ___
J:<060 Ln~taJI underg'=.ound servi_ce~ __ . ___
tw t u Construct Layerwori<.s
KUtlU constru~. )(ernrn~;~ & catchpits
K100 Weed Killer& Pave
K 11 o Landscaping
K130 R()a_dif1~.!!1gs__ _'____
_K 150 Cle<~_n & HandQy~-- .. ____ ___
\
,
1!~~~;~~gg:; ~~g~~~gg:
2!~0/0~2004'21/05/2004
...
1: 1
! : r+j::i I
O~!.Q~?004 1 10/05/2004
sf
......... ; ..
.........
,
'
1'
' -i-
3! 17/06/2004 121/06/2004
3: 18/06/2004 122/06/2004
3:
W'
[9___g
231
.. . .
.. 1
.. ,.
:
-
---"--- ...-.--..t:_........ . . .
1
, . m . ......
~
I tb
.:. It=.-.
. ... .
:t;:::
\
tp
Il
J120
}130
_J1 4o
J150
J160
J 170
_J18D_
J_185
!! . - &161
L= - . . . . . I '
~~~~6/2004 ~
1~~s-~~~-~~=~~~~-~~.1
11l
f\
--:::::-: - -5
22/06/2004
~tHi70Ba5ement
-----
31 16/06/2004! 18/06/2004
ff18Q-GroundFioor--.--~- .. =~----------Jt.17t.06/2oo4 21/06/2004
!:f]9()_ !!_Floor
_____ ___
3\18/06/2004:22106/2004
JOOO STAIRCASE
111
\ :
. ~
H~12g~~=':"aEJ:2JECTIO~
41
3 i 29/06/20041 01/0712004
1: 30/06/2004 I 30/06/2004
_,
t . L---9
1I
J
... ;I
'
1!
...
! !
! i 1i
I :i !
1
..
"14m
.. _.
OM 203735
G420
G430
G440
f445
Current
! Durn i Start
Finish
__ [
25/06/2004 29/06/2004
~
4! 26/06/2004 01/07/2004
j
3! 29/0612004 01/07/2004
-1 30/0612004 30/06/2004
Activity Description
External Sun Screens
lnslall Balu~ading
Final Paint
Clean & handover
2004
"
1
H;2o_._.FiRE-.P.-ROTECTION
IN..S. T.-.AL. LA ilON
H130 Basement
'
---------'-------3:
j_i______________
J 11 o
T120
J130
J140
.J15o
J 160
J170
_J1BO
J 185
I,.,
I iQ::::l
C:
22106/2004 I
18/06/2004
21to612oo4
22106/2004
IF$..
'.".
I
14[[5/05/2004 24105/2004
4 05105/2004 10/05/2004
3: 06/0SI20o4 10/05/2004
~loRi512oo4 11/05/2004
,
3' 111o5t2oo4 13to5t2004
-- -------.--2-14I0512oo4 17to5t2004
___j ___2 _i 7i0512004 18105/2004
__
1
2:_18/05}_2004 19/05/2004
-~--2- _20/05f2004 21/05/2004
1
1 : 24/0512004 24/05/2004
Brickwork
~Taster~------
Handrails________
screeci-s~----
-=
-- ------- ------
-: __
-carper'!~-------
KOOoEXTER>iAJ. WORKS
~ ..
I I
j i
I I
..
. --- ---
JOOO STAIRCASE
3ti
~I
5
../.06/2004 22/06/2004
3;: 16
16106/2004
18106/2004
,--5--16/0S/2004
3j-16io612004
1]1o612oo4
3:18/06/2004
231-
ij::p
l 1-c=
J~
,,
....
__
3 ~ 2210612004 24/0612004
3 i 2310612004 25/0612004
H]
11
N'
1Ill
June
3!
i il
r '
"1
'
19' ,_,,.,010612004
j
1
KOBO
K100
K 11 o
K130
K150
5:21/06/2004 i 25/06/2004
~-23/06/2004 ; 28/06/2004
___ ~;]8/06/2004 ! 29/06/2004
1 30/06/2004 ; 30/06/2004
____
CONC_BETE FRAM~_
BUILDING SEALED .
FIRSTHANDOVEFf___
FINAL COMPLETION -
_ _ _ j:=_]~26ib5t2004; 26/05/2004
j
1. 10/06/2004: 10/06/2004
----,-----.F01/0712004: 01/07/2004
- - - - ~---r 02167/2004 02/07/2004
..
----------
--1
n--
!\
1'9__ . . . .; . . L. ..h
L___
-'i
'
'e;.,
~.
I
I
__
Page 4 of4
-
---------------
OM '03735