Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DANILO
RAMON
S.
FERNANDEZ, Petitioner,- versus -HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL
AND JESUS L. VICENTE,Respondents.
G. R. No. 187478 December
DECISION
21,
2009
OF
provided
all
essential
To
summarize,
private
respondents
own
evidence did not categorically establish where
petitioners domicile is nor did said evidence
conclusively prove that for the year prior to the
May 14, 2007 petitioner had a domicile other
than where he actually resided, i.e. Sta. Rosa,
Laguna. To be sure, Gallego v. Vera[41] decreed
that:
Ultimately,
the
Court
recapitulates
in
Papandayan, Jr. that it is the fact of residence
that is the decisive factor in determining
whether or not an individual has satisfied the
residency qualification requirement.