IASbabas Daily Current Affairs 5th August, 2016

iasbaba.com/2016/08/iasbabas-daily-current-affairs-5th-august-2016/

IAS baba

Archives

INTERNATIONAL

TOPIC: General Studies 2

India and its neighbourhood- relations.
Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting
Indias Interests
Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on Indias
interests, Indian Diaspora.

Securing the Indus Treaty

Indus Water Treaty
After independence, Pakistan became the lower riparian country
Two important irrigation head works, one at Madhopur on Ravi River and the other at Ferozepur on Sutlej
River, on which the irrigation canal supplies in Punjab (Pakistan) had been completely dependent, were left in
the Indian Territory.
A dispute thus arose between two countries regarding the utilization of irrigation water from existing facilities.
Brokered by World Bank, the Indus Water Treaty was signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan.
Water sharing, transparency and collaboration were the pillars of the treaty.
Why in news?
Pakistan has shown its intent to take India to an International arbitral tribunal- Again
It indicates how water still remains a discord for Pakistan even when there is a water sharing treaty signed.

1/7

International water sharing treaties

In Asia, the vast majority of the 57 transnational river basins have no water-sharing arrangement or any other
cooperative mechanism.
However, India has water sharing treaties with both the countries located downstream to it, i.e. Pakistan and
Bangladesh which governs the subcontinents two largest rivers Indus and Ganga.
Indias treaties with two countries are the only pacts which have specific water sharing formulas at cross
borders.
The 1996 Ganga treaty set up a new standard in guaranteeing delivery of specific water quantities in the
critical dry season.
In contrast to this, China has multiple rivers flowing to more than dozen countries but it doesnt have any
water sharing treaty with co-riparian states
The Indus treaty

It is worlds most generous water sharing arrangement in terms of

Sharing ratio (80.52 per cent of the aggregate water flows in the Indus system reserved for Pakistan)
Total volume of basin waters for the downstream state (Pakistan gets 90 times greater volume of
water than Mexicos share under a 1944 pact with the U.S.)
Apart from water sharing, there is partitioning of the river too . The Indus treaty is the first and only
treaty to do so.
The Indus basin is divided into upper and lower parts. It has limited Indias full sovereignty right to the lower
section. Whereas, Pakistan gets the upper rivers of J&K.
According to the agreement, India got three eastern rivers the Beas, Ravi and Sutlej and Pakistan got
the western rivers Indus, Chenab and Jhelum.
It is the only inter-country water agreement which has the doctrine of restricted sovereignty, where in the
upper riparian state has to not interfere in the downstream state.
The treaty curbs Indias control over the timing and quantum of Pakistan earmarked rivers
transboundary flows.
J&K sufferings

2/7

Water is a crucial natural resource which is essential for economic development of J&K
The gifting of river waters has generated grievances among the people.
In 2011, the J&K government hired an international consultant to assess the states cumulative economic
losses. The figures are in hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
The J&K legislation is encountering persistent demand from the population for revision or abrogation of Indus
treaty since a resolution for treaty review was passed in 2003
The central government has tried to handle the situation amidst backlash from underdevelopment and also
Pakistan abetted insurrection through modestly sized run of the river hydropower projects to address the
chronic electricity shortages
Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity (ROR) is a type of hydroelectric generation plant whereby little or no water
storage is provided.

Pakistans obstructionist tactics

The run of the river hydropower projects are permitted under the Indus Treaty
Pakistan wants no Indian works on any of the three western rivers
It seeks international involvement by invoking the treatys dispute-settlement provisions.
This provision permits a neutral-expert assessment or the constitution of a seven-member arbitral tribunal.
This is Pakistans strategy to induce more discontent and violence in the Indian state by denying the limited
permissible benefits under the treaty.
Kishenganga hydropower project
Pakistan revealed its strategy when in 2010, it persuaded the international arbitrary tribunal to order India to
suspend its construction of 330-megawatt hydropower project on a small Indus tributary, River Kishenganga
Though Indias project got suspended, Pakistan with Chinese aid build its own three-times larger hydropower
plant on Kishenganga (called Neelum in Pakistan) so as to stake a priority right on river water use.
In 2013, the tribunal ruling gave India a setback when it allowed India to resume work on the project but with
condition to ensure a minimum flow of 9 cumecs of water for Pakistan.
Prescribing such a minimum flow went beyond the treatys terms and the laws of nature.
Hence, Pakistans move to initiate a new arbitrary proceedings over Kishenganga and Ratle projects reminds
how Indias unparrallel water generosity has led into unending troubles
Lessons yet not learnt
In 1960, India aimed at trading water for peace by signing the treaty.
Yet, within five years, Pakistan wages a war against India to grab Indian part of J&K in 1965.
Chinas involvement in POK through construction of dams has created more strains in India and Pakistan
relationship.
India has been pursuing small sized projects while Pakistan with Chinas help is building mega dams like
7,000-megawatt Bunji Dam and the 4,500-megawatt Bhasha Dam.
The biggest dam that India has built post-independence is the 2,000-megawatt Tehri project in Uttarakhand.
Conclusion

3/7

Pakistan needs to act rationally

China recently thrashed an international tribunal ruling by declaring that it was its internal matter and such a
tribunal had no right to pronounce an order which had no legal or historical basis to claim most of the South
China Sea.
This is not an isolated case though. Major Powers rarely accept the international tribunal awards.
If Pakistan wants that India should upheld the Indus water treaty, it has to now stop to wage a constant
propaganda battle against India on water issue.
Pakistans repeatedly invoking dispute resolution provision of the treaty and bringing international
intercession is sending a wrong message to India.
India will be compelled to understand such actions of Pakistan in a sense that compliance with treaty
obligations and arbitration decisions is counterproductive.
As there is no enforcement mechanism in the international law, nothing can stop India from emulating the
example of the major powers.
India has the full right and authority to invoke Article 62 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties if
Pakistan continues with its state-sponsored terrorism.
Even the International Court of Justice has held that a treaty may be dissolved by reason of a
fundamental change of circumstances.
India is at the losing end of this treaty. Yet it is honouring the treaty in its capability. If Pakistan also wishes the
treaty survives, it has to strike a balance between using the river waters and not causing palpable harm to
co-riparian state by exporting terror.
Connecting the dots:
1. India needs to deal with Pakistan not merely through words but actions also. Whether it is water treaty
dispute, state sponsored terrorism or border issues. Critically analyse
2. If you were an expert on India-Pakistan relation, what would have been your views on it and possible future
course of action?

ECONOMICS

TOPIC:

General Studies 2
Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections.
Issues relating to poverty and hunger.
General Studies 3
Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization of resources, growth, development and
employment.

4/7

Inclusive growth and issues arising from it.

Rural to Urban Migration in India

Findings from the survey of migrant workers in Ghatkopar, a Mumbai suburb, shows that Within 4-6 months of
migrating, each of the surveyed families had managed to earn enough to lift them out of poverty and even repay
their loans.
Does migration hold the same promise for the average Indian rural worker?
Study conducted in rural Bihar points to increasing outmigration for work, and its importance in livelihood
strategies of households in rural Bihar.
Bihar has the highest migration rates in the country, as was shown by a National Sample Survey
Organisation (NSSO) report based on 2007-08 data.
In this study it was found that Deprived social groups are using migration to improve their socio-economic
status in the rural economy.
The study concluded that despite different castes and socio-economic backgrounds, migration might be
helping those at the bottom of the socio-economic ladderthe most being in Bihar.
Poor land ownership and exploitation
Access to land is an important determinant of incomes in rural India, and deprived social groups such as
Dalits are often at a disadvantage due to poor land ownership.
Traditionally, workers from this social group have been forced to work as wage labourers and making
themselves vulnerable to being exploited from the local landlord.
This group seems to be resorting to migration to escape the exploitation ridden village economy.

Does migration help in economic terms?

The answer is a big yes.
Deciding to work outside the village is something that is happening in other parts of the country too.
Young dalit men prefer working outside the village even when they choose to live in the village. The supply of rural
labour to the expanding non-farm urban service sector and the flow of urban aspirations to the rural world have
rapidly increased over the years.
Households with migrant members earned approximately over73000 in 2011, as compared to an income
of Rs.62,235 in case of households without migrant members.
Between migration and welfare schemes such as the MGNREGA, an overwhelming majority opts for the
former.
Income from casual labour in government programmes including MGNREGA and Backward Regions
Grant Fund (BRGF) formed less than 1% of total income across all caste groups in 2011, except for the
SC/ STs where it constituted a slightly higher but still paltry 1.9% of income.
Deprived social groups are using migration to improve their socio-economic status in the rural economy.
Remittances:

5/7

Remittance had the highest share in incomes of Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribe (SC/ST) and Muslim
households.
This is because there is at least one migrant in these households.
In class terms, agricultural labourer households reported the highest increase in share of households with at
least one migrant.
Remittances play an essential role in ensuring food for many rural poor households and thus constitute an efficient
strategy for facing adversities such as low agricultural productivity and the inherent risks and instability of farming
activities. Moreover, remittances may serve as insurance to improve or counter crisis situations, thus limiting
negative effects on food security.
Evidence shows that the impact of remittances on agriculture is mixed and highly contextual. In some cases,
migration and remittances foster household farm investment and agricultural production, while in others, the
opposite occurs.
No quality living conditions:
More people are now migrating for urban informal jobs.
Migrant households have to suffer a significant deterioration in quality of their lives when they migrate.
Often one associates the cost of migration to be associated with lack of proper dwelling for the worker and
his/her family. This need not be true for all migrant workers.
In fact, a comparison of average housing amenities in rural India and urban slums shows that the latter might
be better off than the former.
Houses in slum areas are often poorly located and congested which leads to several diseases.
Migrants often do not have access to proper health facilities which leads them to lose their jobs or end up
with life-threatening illnesses.
Any downturn in labour demand could immensely increase hardships.
Therefore, in terms of cash-in-hand, migrants certainly have better situations, but they are faced with new
challenges in terms of shelter, water, etc.
Conclusion:
The story of migration has its own tales of sorrow as several children turn into rag pickers and families have to live in
inhuman conditions in urban areas. Many dont get employment throughout the year and commute between urban
and rural areas.
However, for the landless and marginal farmers who are in constant debt, migration is the only choice for livelihood.
Migration comes as a boon for several people who get getter fresh opportunities and send remittances home.
Some analysts advocate internal mobility as a necessity for lifting people out of poverty. Remittances play an
essential role in ensuring food for many rural poor households and thus constitute an efficient strategy for facing
adversities such as low agricultural productivity and the inherent risks and instability of farming activities. Moreover,
remittances may serve as insurance to improve or counter crisis situations, thus limiting negative effects on food
security.
While migration is definitely helping people seek new opportunities, it cannot be a substitute for a generating quality
employment in more stable sectors.
Connecting the dots:

6/7

1. Critically analyze whether migration is recommended for growth or not. List some of the push and pull factors
that are responsible for triggering rural to urban migration.
2. Can public works offering relatively predictable employment opportunities be effective in slowing rural-urban
migration. Critically examine.

MUST READ

Bihars draconian prohibition law

Hindu

The incentive to dope

Indian Express

Living in a glass house

Indian Express

Banks are driving financial inclusion

Livemint

7/7