Geotechnical Special
Publication No. 259
Behavior of Geomaterials
and Foundations for Civil
Infrastructure Applications
Edited by
Behzad Fatahi, Ph.D.
Tamer Sorour, Ph.D.
Zhen Leng, Ph.D.
GEOTECHNICAL
SPECIAL
PUBLICATION
NO.
259
GEO
OCHINA
H A 2016
BEHAVIIOR OF GEOMATTERIALSS AND FO
OUNDAT
TIONS
FOR CIVIL INFRASTR
N
TRUCTUR
RE APPL
LICATION
NS
SE
ELECTED PAPERS FROM TH
HE PROCE
EEDINGS OF THE F
FOURTH
GE
EOCHINA
A INTERN
NATIONA
AL CONFE
ERENCE
July 2527,
2
20116
Shandong, Chinna
SPON
NSORED BY
Y
Shando
ong Univerrsity
Shando
ong Deparrtment of T
Transportattion
University of Oklahhoma
Chineese Nation
nal Sciencee Foundatioon
GeoInstitute of
o the American Socieety of Civiil Engineerrs
ED
DITED BY
Behzad
d Fatahi, Phh.D.
Tamer Sorour, Phh.D.
Zhen Leng, Ph.D
D.
Published
P
by
b the Amerrican Societyy of Civil En
ngineers
iii
Preface
As a result of increasing and continuous social and infrastructural growth, appropriate
ground for living and development becomes progressively scanty. Thus, engineers
have been considering constructing buildings and infrastructure at locations with less
favorable geotechnical conditions and in some cases in seismically active regions.
Therefore, proper understanding of the soil behavior has become significantly
important to optimize the design and construction of foundations. This Geotechnical
Special Publication (GSP) contains 30 papers that were accepted and presented at the
GeoChina International Conference on Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative
Technologies for Severe Weathers and Climate Changes, held in Shandong, China on
July 2527, 2016. Major topics covered in this GSP are dynamic behavior of soils and
foundations, and physical, numerical, constitutive modeling of soil behavior. The
overall theme of the GSP is Behaviour of Geomaterials and Foundations for Civil
Infrastructure Applications, and all papers address different research findings of this
theme. It provides an effective mean of sharing recent technological advances,
engineering applications and research results among scientists, researchers and
engineering practitioners. All abstracts and full papers have been peerreviewed prior
to their acceptance and inclusion in this publication. We are most grateful to all
authors and reviewers who have contributed to this Geotechnical Special Publication.
ASCE
iv
Contents
Offshore Foundations Applied to Renewable Energy Infrastructure (RES) ........ 1
Luisa N. EquihuaAnguiano, Marcos OrozcoCaldern, Carlos ChavezNegrete,
and Jos Roberto PrezCruz
Study on the Property and Analysis of DX Pile Bearing Capacity ........................ 9
Po Lin Chen, DaWei Jian, DeXin He, and Dave TaTeh Chang
Influence of Soft Soil Shear Strength on the Seismic Response of Concrete
Buildings Considering SoilStructure Interaction ................................................. 17
Ruoshi Xu, Behzad Fatahi, and Aslan S. Hokmabadi
Validation of the Structural Analysis by PLAXIS2D Geotechnical Software ...... 25
Mahbubeh Mortezaee and Ali Akhtarpour
Nonlinear Behavior of a 2 2 Pile Group under Rotating MachineInduced
Vertical Vibrations ................................................................................................... 33
S. Biswas and B. Manna
PileSoil Interactions under ThermoMechanical Conditions Imposed by
Geothermal Energy Piles in Sand ........................................................................... 41
Rajni Saggu and Tanusree Chakraborty
Experimental Study on the Dynamic Response of PHC PipePiles in
Liquefiable Soil ......................................................................................................... 49
Fuyun Huang, Haimin Qian, and Yizhou Zhuang
The Elastodynamic Interaction of a Rigid Circular Foundation Embedded
in a Functionally Graded Transversely Isotropic HalfSpace .............................. 57
Reza Yaghmaie and Hamidreza Asgari
Axisymmetric Vibration of an Elastic Circular Plate in an
Inhomogeneous HalfSpace...................................................................................... 65
Reza Yaghmaie and Hamidreza Asgari
Numerical Study on a Novel Vibration Screening Technique Using
Intermittent Geofoam ............................................................................................... 73
M. Majumder and P. Ghosh
Seismic Resistance of Batter Pile Foundations in Peaty Soft Ground ................. 81
Koichi Tomisawa and Koichi Isobe
ASCE
ASCE
ASCE
vi
Professor, Civil Engineering, UMSNH Univ., Felicitas del Ro, Morelia, Mich. Mexico. Email:
nicteea@yahoo.com.mx; cachavez@umich.mx
2
Specialist Engineer, Cd. del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico. Email: marcos.orozco.c@outlook.com
3
Conacyt Research Fellow. Email: jrperezcr@conacyt.mx
Abstract: New sources of energy are necessary today to totally avoid the oil
dependence. People around the world are researching on renewable energy systems
(RES). In this sense, we present an overview of the current status of the energy
production, based on RES technologies, in Mexico. In addition, a typical yield failure
envelope obtained with RS3 in 3D is included. The main objective is to present this
envelope, which has the special soil characteristics, found in sea sediments.
Additionally, we present a response spectrum, since earthquakes are events that
frequently impact the infrastructure, making the design always dependant on transient
events The time histories of acceleration, used to obtain the spectrum, correspond to
earthquakes localized in the area of the Gulf of Mexico.
INTRODUCTION
Worldwide oil dependence involves high economic and environmental costs due to
rising use of fuels and derivative and the declining global reserves. One of the main
disadvantages for oil exploration is the greater water depth, which is reflected in
difficulties to achieve special infrastructure. Renewable energies (RES) are a
challenge for economics and clean energy sources in the world. Countries like Mexico
require future developments of this kind of energy to support the demand growth. For
this, it is necessary to consider the offshore wave and wind potential besides to its
onshore potential. Developing RES require of many engineering disciplines and
Geotechnics is closely linked to the development of these. Suction caissons are an
excellent alternative for offshore wind turbines. These foundations are widely used for
oil and gas industry. There are many studies of the suction caisson used in deep
waters, nevertheless, few studies have been developed for wind turbines.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Renewable energies are defined as those practically limitless sources respect to the
human lifetime and whose use is technically feasible. General RES classification can
be divided in two types: tidal and wind energies.
ASCE
ASCE
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
FIG. 1. (a) Typical loads and dimensions for a 3.5 MW turbine (VillalobosJara,
2006) and Typical foundations for wind offshore turbines (b) monopod (c)
tripod/tetrapod (d) piled jacket tower and (e) gravity base as reported by
Theengineer (2015).
(a)
(b)
FIG. 2. (a) CPT profile (Colliat, 1999) and (b) scheme of suction caisson
(M=moment load, V=vertical load, H=horizontal load).
Table 1. Geotechnical effective parameters using Mohr Coulomb criterion
c (kN/m2) E (kN/m2)
OCR
Soil
s ()
sat (kN/m3)
Clay
17
27
1.6
9049
0.35
1.0
NUMERICAL MODELING
Mesh
Figure 3a shows the mesh used in all calculations, where it is observed a more
refinement in the anchor area to ensure a good accuracy. Boundaries conditions are
zerodisplacement in the vertical plane (z axis), while the base of the mesh is fixed in
three coordinates (x, y and z). The mesh has an extension of 66 m in depth and has
150m x 150m. Figure 3b shows the Major principal strainSigma xz effective curve
obtained at the point A (Fig 5a), using H=5.9 MN, M=0 MN and V=0 MN.
ASCE
(a)
(b)
FIG. 3. (a) RS3 mesh for L/d=0.5 (10951 elements) and (b) Major principal
strain  xz curve, H=5.9 MN, M=0 MN, L/d=0.5.
Yield failure envelope
The yield points obtained of numerical simulations were plotted in a plane and fitted
using equation (1) (VillalobosJara, 2006).
2
H M
H M
y=
1 = 0
+
2e
hV
i 0
i 0
i 0 dmV
i 0
hV
dmV
(1)
Where hi and mi represent the intersection of each ellipse (with the axis H/Vo and
M/dVo respectively); e is the eccentricity of the ellipse; H is the horizontal load; M is
the momentum; V0 corresponds to the maximum vertical load; and d is caisson
diameter.
ASCE
The yield envelope, obtained under different horizontal (H) and moment (M) loads,
was normalized respect to the maximum vertical load (Vo) and the caisson diameter (d)
as shown in Figure 4. The filled points are the numerical results obtained for different
HM combinations and V=0 MN. The plot of the yield surface, using Eq. (1),
corresponds to the solid line. There is a good agreement between the two results.
Figure 5b shows the failure kinematics obtained in RS3, with load H and with HM
loads combination.
(a)
(b)
Table 2 includes the six combinations analysis, the combination number can be
increased depending of seismic sources signals.
Site response results
Throughout the depth, we calculated the results of profiles variation of normalized
stiffness modulus (G/Gmax), shear strain (), the maximum deformation of the land and
the maximum acceleration (amax) were calculated throughout the depth. The transfer
functions, the history of accelerations and response spectrum were calculated at
different depths.
Figure 7 presents accelerations results, obtained from the analysis of seismic
response of offshore site. Specifically the histories of accelerations, calculated on the
surface of the seabed and at 120 m depth, correspond to the bottom of the soil profile
on the site. Figure 7a depicts the condition of the lower bound estimated soil
properties (0.85Vs) and a maximum acceleration of 0.025g (combination 4) in the
bedrock. It can be seen that the movement of the seabed level are amplified with
respect to the calculated at 120 m depth. Figures 7b and 7c show the combinations,
considered as the central and upper limit (factor of 1.0 and 1.15 for Vs), with
maximum acceleration in the bedrock of 0.03g and 0.025g; respectively.
(a)
(b)
We compared the calculated response spectrum with the response spectrum included
at the reference NRF003PEMEX2007, that considers the design spectrum for a
return period of 200 years and a damping =5% for Bay of Campeche and Northern
Region of Gulf of Mexico. Figure 8 presents that the maximum spectral accelerations
are close to 0.29 s, and in some cases the spectral accelerations exceed the plateau
ASCE
spectrum of reference NRF for the Bay of Campeche, hence the importance of
calculating the design spectrum.
(a)
(b)
(c)
FIG. 7. Acceleration time histories calculated at 120 m depth and sea bed. (a)
Combination 4, (b) Combination 8 and (c) Combination 6.
Spectral acceleration, g
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.1
10
Period, sec
FIG. 8. Response spectra computed and comparison with NRF003.
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, a typical yield failure envelope obtained with RS3, considering special
soil characteristics of sea sediments has been presented. The failure points obtained
using RS3 has a good agreement with the ellipse obtained from equation (1).
Adhesion factor is not possible to simulate in RS3, so that the responses shown in
this article have a higher load capacity. It is necessary obtain envelopes that take into
ASCE
account adhesion factor. Laboratory tests and full scale models are a necessary to
complement the seismic response of civil structures.
A study of the seismic response of an offshore site, taking into account both the
seismic and geotechnical site was made. The program used to calculate the seismic
response takes into account dimensional equivalent linear model. Three sets of soil
properties were studied through varying the profile of Vs and using two components of
acceleration in order to calculate the response spectra at the seafloor.
Mexico has great potential to develop renewable energy systems (RES), however it
requires more research on all the related fields.
REFERENCES
Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K. and Lin, C.H. (2000). EERA A computer program for
equivalentlinear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits.
University of Southern California. Department of Civil Engineering.
BMDSF (1997). Base Mexicana de Datos de Sismos Fuertes, Sociedad Mexicana de
Ingeniera Ssmica, A.C.; Instituto de Ingeniera, UNAM; CFE; Fundacin ICA;
CIRES, A.C.; CENAPRED, Volumen II, Mxico.
Colliat, J.L. (1999). Caissons succion pour lancrage de structures ptrolires en
mer profonde. Revue Francaise de Gotechnique, 88:1119.
Economa, S.D. (2012). "Informe anual de la Secretaria de Economa." Mxico;
Secretaria de Economa, PROMXICO.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). Phisical Modeling of Seismic
SoilPile Structure Interaction for Buildings on Soft Soils, International Journal
of Geomecanics ASCE, ISSN 15323641/04014046(18), Vol. 15, april.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fakher, A. and Fatahi, B. (2012). Full scale lateral behavior of
monopoles in granular marine soils, Journal of the Marine Structures, Elsevier,
Vol. 29, december, 198210.
NRF003PEMEX.2007. Diseo y evaluacin de plataformas marinas fijas en el Golfo
de Mxico. Comit de Normalizacin de Petrleos Mexicanos y Organismos
Subsidiarios, enero 2007.
Plaxis 2D Version 8, Edited by R.B.J. Brinkgreve, Delf University of Technology &
Plaxis b.v., the Netherlands.
RS3 Version 1.017 64bit, Copyright 20132015 Rocscience Inc., Toronto, Ontario,
Canada.
SENER, (2012). National Energy Balance 2011. Secretary of Energy Planning and
Technological Development, Mexico.
SSN (2013). Servicio Sismolgico Nacional, catlogo de sismos. UNAM, Instituto de
Geofsica, http://www.ssn.unam.mx/.
Taboada, V.M., Gan, K.C., Cruz, D., Barrera, P., Espinosa, E., and Carrasco, D.
(2012). Field Gmax relationships for Bay of Campeche clay. Memorias XXVI
Reunin Nacional de Mecnica de Suelos e Ingeniera Geotcnica, Sociedad
Mexicana de Ingeniera Geotcnica, A.C., Cancn, Quintana Roo, Mxico.
VillalobosJara, F.A. (2006). Model Testing of Foundations for Offshore Wind
Turbines. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Oxford University, UK.
Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.
Journal of the Geotechnical Eng. Div., ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 1, January, 89107.
ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Yuan Univ., 200 Chung Pei Rd., Taoyuan 32023,
Taiwan, R.O.C. Email: hauer45680@yahoo.com.tw
2
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Yuan Univ., 200 Chung Pei Rd., Taoyuan 32023,
Taiwan, R.O.C. Email: davidjian520@yahoo.com.tw
3
The Inventor of DX Pile Technology, Beijing ZhongKuo Foundation Technology CO., LTD. Email:
dx13@sohu.com
4
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Yuan Univ., 200 Chung Pei Rd., Taoyuan 32023, Taiwan,
R.O.C. Email: ttc514ttc@yahoo.com.tw
Abstract: In this study, three sets of vertical static loading test for the performance of
DX piles (=600 mm) are implemented in Fangcheng Port Steel Plant Construction
Project (in Guangdong Province, PRC). Test results showed that three sets of DX pile
(600 mm), that were even though not to be plugged into the Moderately weathered
rock bed, but their ultimate bearing capacity are greater than or equal to () 9,800 kN
and tested settlements ranged in 21~24.54 mm, are better than the requirements of
original design of straight hole embedded Pile (800, plugintorock). Through the
Stress  Strain Gauge installed along the pile and pile bottom, we found that the major
bearing capacity of DX pile came from the bearing plate at highly weathered rock layer;
while the shared bearing capacity of pile bottom is less than 25% of total capacity.
Therefore, by using the DX pile, the piles are no longer need to be plugged into deeper
rock stratum. Through the above results, we can also infer that the impact of pile bottom
sediments of DX pile is less than castinplace pile.
INTRODUCTION
DX pile is a new type of variable crosssection pile technology, which is a multinodal
rotary drilling, squeezing and expanding castinsitu pile invented by the Chairman Mr.
He DeXin of Beijing Zhongkuo Foundation Technology Co., Ltd. (named after the
inventor Mr. He DeXin, hereinafter referred to as DX pile). Based on the traditional
holedrilling castinsitu pile technique, DX pile forms its bearing mechanism by using
a dedicated rotary drilling equipment to squeeze and expand pile near the bottom into a
bearing plate shape then pour concrete, so as to be jointly supported by its pile body,
bearing plate and pile toe. Since the bearing plate increases effective bearing area of pile,
meanwhile the squeezing and expanding equipment compact the surrounding soil to
dense, thus the bearing capacity of DX pile can be greatly improved.
ASCE
10
In comparison with the traditional squeezing and expanding pile technologies, this
rotary drilling, squeezing and expanding device has significant advantages, such as:
providing bilateral relative displacement and Dual hydraulic cylinders to drive the three
pairs of rotary drilling squeezing and expanding arms, always in contact with the
surrounding earth, to cut, roll and squeeze soil with little disturbance and relatively less
sediment; furthermore the bearing stratum of bearing plate can be selected depending on
ground conditions, with the advantages of high flexibility, adaptability, fast and safety
construction.
What is important is that DX pile is a new type of pile jointly supported by
multisection side resistance (skin friction) and multilayerend resistance (end bearing).
Currently, its stress mechanism and calculation method are still in the exploratory phase.
With an increasingly wide application, the DX pile can greatly shorten the demand pile
length, reduce the consumption of concrete and save the construction period, thus it
appears a very broad application prospects. Due to competitive advantages, the DX pile
has been used in various fields of pile foundation projects and created great effects and
economic benefits. This case study will focus on the bearing features of DX pile, with
its application in the highly and moderately weathered rock layer. Chen F. and Chen L.
(2012)Chen L., Zhang Q. and Yuan X. (2012)Wang M., He D. and Tang S.(2012)
Geological Conditions of the Test Site
The test site is situated in the seafilling area of cofferdam and Reclaimed sand.
Initially, the stretch of beaches and shallow sea had been filled, the soil layers are
described in a descending way as follows: (as shown in Table 1):
Table 1. Soil Parameter on Site
Soil
No
Classification
Clayey soil
Loose
Moderately
compacted
Fluid plastic
and soft plastic
Completely
weathered
Strongly
weathered
Moderately
weathered
Completely weathered
muddy sandstone
highly weathered
muddy sandstone
Moderately weathered
muddy sandstone
11
12
13
Thickn
ess (m)
2.42.7
Max tested
skin friction
(kPa)
59
6.38.1
83
0.32.8
100
0.52.5
102
6.29.9
114
134
Max tested
bottom
friction (kPa)
12973
(1) Clayey fill earth: Purplebrowngray, with plant roots, slightly wet, loose state with
a thickness of 2.7m.
ASCE
11
(2) Silty fine sand: Yellow graygraybrownish gray, mechanical reclaimed seabed
sand, partly containing round gravel, coarse sand with shells, shell fragments;
rendering saturated, looseslightly tight state, and with a thickness of 6.3m.
(3) Reclaimed clayey soil: Gray brownish gray, mechanical reclaimed seabed formed
mud deposits, partly containing silty fine sand with shells, shell fragments;
rendering saturated, plastic flowsoft plastic state, and with a thickness of 2.8m.
(4) Completely weathered muddy sandstone: purplegrey purple and partially light grey
and grey black; folded with silty mudstone, shale, the main mineral components
including quartz, feldspar, clay minerals and sericite etc.; Cementation of iron and
mud; rock core rendered a soillike state, and with a thickness of 2.5m.
(5) Highly weathered muddy sandstone: Purplepurple graypartial light graydark
gray; folded with silty mudstone, shale, the main mineral components including
quartz, feldspar, clay minerals and sericite etc.; Cementation of iron and mud;
sandlike and moderately thick layered structure; rock core rendered earthlike and
clastic state, dehydration easy to crack into a chunky, and with a thickness of 9.9m;
(6) Moderately weathered muddy sandstone: Purplepurple graypartial light gray;
folded with silty mudstone, shale, the main mineral components including quartz,
feldspar, clay minerals and sericite etc.; Cementation of iron and mud; sandlike
and moderately thick layered structure; rock core rendered long, short columnar or
block state (brokenintact state); dehydration easy to crack into a chunky; not
drilled through.
Allocation of Test Piles and Matters Concerned
As a reference, the Maximum Test Load of DX pile testing was scheduled not to
exceed 10000 kN; and the bearing capacity calculation and type design of DX pile is
conducted on the basis of geological exploration data to select a highly weathered rock
layer to act as bearing stratum of bearing plate and ensure that pile bottom is embedded
in the moderately weathered rock, and area from the bottom of bearing plate to the pile
toe should be embedded in the highly weathered rock at least 2.0 m (as shown in Figure
1). There were Six DX test piles to be set up on site, numbered #91, #92, #93 and
#97, #98, #99, to carry out this ultimate bearing capacity test of axially loaded
vertical pile, its relevant dimensions are as detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Details of DX test pile
No.
#91
#92
#93
#97
#98
#99
ASCE
Pile
length(m)
29.1
29.1
23.0
36.6
31.0
25.3
Pile
diameter(m)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bulbs
depth(m)
19
18
19
16
16
18
Bulbs
diameter(m)
1.4
1.4
1.4
2
2
2
Maximum test
load (kN)
pile failure or not
exceed 10000kN
not exceed
10000kN
12
ASCE
Item
Hole diameter
deviation
Hole depth deviation
50mm
+300mm
Plate diameter
deviation
Hole deviation
Slurry proportion
Slurry viscosity
8
9
13
4%
<1%
<1.25g/cm3 (Within 500mm to bottom of
hole)
Funnel viscosity 28s (Within 500mm to
bottom of hole); Marsh funnel 3045s
8% (Within 500mm to bottom of hole)
100mm
ASCE
14
Since the measured settlement of all the three piles was lower than 24.5mm, far lower
than the damage limit 40mm, and reached the piles bearing of 9,800kN, extremely close
to the maximum test load (10,000kN), the pile testing was suspended. And based on the
test results, the bearing of the test pile had reached 9,800kN, thus the axial
stressresistance bearing value of the DX pile can be set as over 4,900kN. Accordingly,
the bearing plate installed in the highly weathered rock layer can effectively enhance the
bearing of the DX piles and reduce settlement.
With the results of three test piles (diameter 0.8 m, numbered # 97, # 98, # 99)
plotted as axial force and depth relationship diagram, their bearing capacity envelops
(as shown in FIG. 8, FIG. 9 and FIG. 10) are consistent with 0.6 m test pile (numbered #
91, # 92, # 93), thus pile axial force appeared plunged at the location near the bearing
plate, bearing plate shared a great part of the load, while the bottom of the pile bearing
further reduced to 18% ~ 25% of load which would cause a small amount of
displacement in pile bottom. While observed from the average Pile Skin Friction and
Depth relationship diagram (as shown in FIG. 11, FIG. 12 and FIG. 13), it can also be
found that the nearby area of bearing plate shared a great proportion of the Pile Skin
Friction which produces a small amount of displacement.
The settlement of all the these three piles were lower than 18.31mm, far lower than the
damage limit 40mm, and the piles had reached the maximum testing load of 10,000kN,
thus the tests were suspended. Whereas, according to these test results, the limit axial
stressresistance bearing of the test pile can be estimated more than 10,000kN, and the
practice bearing capacity of the DX pile should be set as over 10,000kN.
The analysis of the soil layers of the piles testing showed that a bearing plate installed
on the strongly weathered rock layer can effectively enhance the bearing of pile and
reduce settlement. The reason is that the strongly weathered rock and the bearing plate
provide most of the bearing, which greatly reduces the skin friction development of the
pile body and thus suppress settlement.
ASCE
15
CONCLUSIONS
1. According to the observed settlement and the axial force development, all the six test
piles did not really reach the limit bearing, so there was still large amount potential
ASCE
bearing existed in the piles. However, the piles' bearing capacity based on the
theoretical calculation were lower than that of testing results, thus it is suggested that
the limit axial stressresistance bearing of the test pile can be consistent with the pile
body strength based on the theoretical calculation.
2. Based on the comparison analysis between the two diameters of piles under the same
bearing condition, the bearing plate of 800mm pile provided stronger skin friction
force and had a smaller range of the bearing plate impact than the bearing plate of
600mm pile. It is speculated that the ratio between the diameter of the bearing plate
and the pile is related.
3. With the same bearing, it is possible to shorten the pile length or reduce pile diameter
by adopting DX pile, such as: using 600mm DX pile to meet the requirement of
10,000kN design load and replace the 800mm straight hole pile to achieve the
benefit of highquality and lowcost construction.
4. The bearing plate installed in the highly weathered rock layer can significantly
enhance the bearing, and its pile end embedded on the moderately weathered rock
bed can meet the requirement of bearing and suppress settlement.
5. Based on the measurement of stress gauges installed in the pile body and the pile toe
of the DX pile, it is accounted that the bearing plate situated in the highly weathered
rock layer provided over 50% bearing, and contribution of the bearing at the pile toe
was less than 25% of the total bearing. Thus, there is no need to install large part of
DX pile in the moderately weathered rock bed. Meanwhile, the settlement of the pile
toe plays only little impact on the bearing of the DX pile, it is entirely different from
that of the straighthole pile.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to President Mr. He DeXin of Beijing Zhongkuo Foundation Technology Co.,
Ltd. for providing precious construction experience and professional advice.
References
Chen F. and Chen L. (2012), "Discussion on design method of DX pile." Engineering
sciences, vol. 14, No1, 6064.
Chen L., Zhang Q. and Yuan X. (2012), "Numerical analysis on uplift bearing
characteristic of castinsitu DX pile." Engineering sciences, vol. 14, No1, 3136.
Wang M., He D. and Tang S.(2012) "New pile foundation technology of 21 century:
DX pile." Engineering sciences, vol. 14, No1, 411.
ASCE
16
17
Influence of Soft Soil Shear Strength on the Seismic Response of Concrete Buildings
Considering SoilStructure Interaction
Ruoshi Xu1; Behzad Fatahi2; and Aslan S. Hokmabadi3
1
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS),
Sydney, Australia. Email: Ruoshi.Xu@student.uts.edu.au
2
Senior Lecturer, Geotechnical Engineering (Ph.D., CP.Eng.), School of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. Email: Behzad.fatahi@uts.edu.au
3
Geotechnical Engineer (Ph.D., CP.Eng.), Ove Arup & Partners, Hong Kong. Email: aslan.shokmabadi@arup.com
ASCE
variables and therefore it is expected different test types produce different test results for
soil shear strength. This paper aims to investigate the influence of soft soils undrained
shear strength on the seismic response of moment resisting structures considering soilstructure interaction.
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SOILSTRUCTURE SYSTEM
Byrne et al (2006) highlighted the advantages of the fully nonlinear analytical methods
in simulating the dynamic SSI problems. These methods are capable to precisely model
nonlinearity in dynamic analysis of soilstructure systems and can follow the prescribed
constitutive model. Structural nonlinearity can also be captured in the fully nonlinear
methods. Accordingly, fully nonlinear analytical methods have been adopted in this
study to investigate the influence of undrained shear strength on seismic response of a
moment resisting concrete building. During solution process, specified limiting plastic
moment is assigned to the structural elements to simulate the elasticperfectly plastic
structural behaviour. In addition, the damping of the system in numerical simulation
should be able to reproduce energy losses in natural system subjected to dynamic
loading. Wegel and Walther (1935) mentioned that energy dissipation is largely
hysteretic in nature soil and rock; therefore, hysteretic damping algorithm is necessary to
enable straindependent modulus and damping functions to be incorporated directly into
the numerical simulation. Apart from above mentioned, damping in soil arising from
plastic flow, especially for soft soil medium subjected to large seismic loading, should
also be taken into account by employing appropriate constitutive model in numerical
simulation.
NUMERICAL MODELLING
In this study, seismic soilstructure interaction analysis is conducted adopting direct
method which evaluates the dynamic response in a single step and can capture more
realistic behaviour for the soilstructure system in comparison with the substructure
method. Furthermore, time domain analysis is utilised to consider the nonlinear dynamic
responses, as recommended by Chu (2006). A three dimensional explicit finite
difference based program FLAC3D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) version 5.0
has been employed in this study.
Structure and Soil Medium Model
A fifteenstorey moment resisting concrete building which comprises beam and shell
structural elements has been adopted. SAP2000 V14 has been utilised for the structural
design purpose. The specified compressive strength of concrete and concrete unit weight
are assumed to be 40MPa and 23.5kN/m3, respectively. All the structural sections of the
model have been designed based on inelastic method assuming elasticperfectly plastic
behaviour by specifying a limiting plastic moment of the structural element. According
to AS/NZS1170.12002 (Permanent, imposed and other actions), permanent and
imposed loads are determined and applied to the structure model. It should be noted that
referring to ACI31808 (2008), cracked sections for the reinforced concrete sections are
taken into account through multiplying second moment of area of the uncracked sections
ASCE
18
19
(Ig) by
b cracked section
s
coeffficients (0.35
5Ig for beam
ms, 0.70Ig for columns aand 0.25Ig foor
slabss). Designed
d foundation comprises solid
s
elemennts with 16 m
meters in botth length and
width
h, and 1 meeter in depth
h. Four real earthquake rrecords show
wed in FIG 3 have beenn
appliied at the baase of the fo
oundation to perform dyynamic analyysis for fixeddbase casess.
Finallly, the strructural meembers are designed iin accordannce with A
AS36002009
(Ausstralian Stand
dard for Con
ncrete Structtures) in a w
way that the performancee level of thhe
struccture stays in
n the life saffe zone by limiting
l
the maximum innelastic inteerstorey drifft
to 1.5%. FIG 1a shows the dimensions
d
of
o the structture adoptedd in this studdy possessingg
the fundamental
fu
natural perio
od of 1.28 seeconds.
10
(1)
ASCE
20
way that the strength increases with the depth of soil medium at a rate of 2.3 kPa/m (e.g
50 kPa on the surface and 120 kPa at the bottom of the soil medium). Thus, the average
undrained shear strengths for the soil medium are 65, 75, 85, 95 and 105 kPa. In addition,
a benchmark case, in which only the hysteretic damping of the soil is modelled (i.e. no
plastic flow), has been considered for the comparison purposes.
Hysteretic damping has been adopted to capture the energy losses in the soil medium
during shaking excitations by reproducing the actual hysteretic behaviour of the soil
elements in the nonlinear dynamic analysis. The hysteretic damping in FLAC3D is based
on the defined secant modulus reduction curve (FIG 2) for primary loading and a
Masing rule assumption for loading/unloading (Itasca, 2014). The MohrCoulomb model
has a constant elastic shear modulus (Gmax) and a constant yield stress (Su). The
hysteretic damping model is used to provide energy dissipation in the elastic range of the
adopted constitutive model by reducing the shear modulus from the initial value of Gmax
and increase the damping ratio. Thus, when hysteretic damping is used with MohrCoulomb model in FLAC3D, the modulusreduction technique is applied in elastic range,
and natural damping induced by constitutive model applies in the plastic range.
Free field boundaries have been employed at the side boundaries of the soil medium
generating onedimensional freefield wave propagation in parallel with the maingrid
analysis (Itasca, 2014). Thus, plane waves propagating upward undergo no distortion at
the boundaries as the freefield grid supplies conditions identical to those in an infinite
model. In addition, a rigid boundary has been adopted at the bedrock level to simulate
the large dynamic impedance (e.g. low velocity sediments sitting on high velocity
bedrock).
20
G\Gmax
1
0.8
(a)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.001
0.1
15
(b)
10
0
0.001
0.01
0.1
FIG 2 (a) Relations between G/Gmax versus cyclic shear strain; (b) Relations
between damping ratio versus cyclic shear strain
Earthquake Ground Motions
In order to perform a comprehensive study on the seismic response of the structural
models, two near field seismic accelerations including Northridge earthquake, 1994
(FIG 3a) and Kobe earthquake, 1995 (FIG 3b), and two far field seismic accelerations
including ElCentro earthquake, 1940 (FIG 3c), and Hachinohe earthquake, 1968 (FIG
3d), are utilised for the dynamic timehistory analysis in this study,which are selected by
the International Association for Structural control and Monitoring for benchmark
seismic studies (Karamodin and Kazemi 2008). Also it is well known that near field
earthquakes contain significant forward directivity pulse.
ASCE
21
Name: Northridge
PGA: 0.887 g
Mw (R): 6.7
Dominant frequency: 0.40.63 Hz
0.5
Acceleration (g)
Acceleration (g)
0.5
(a)
Name: Kobe
PGA: 0.833 g
Mw (R): 6.8
Dominant frequency: 1.01.5 Hz
0.5
0.5
1
(b)
1
10
15
20
25
30
10
20
Time (Sec)
0.2
Acceleration (g)
Acceleration (g)
0.4
Name: El Centro
PGA: 0.349 g
Mw (R): 6.9
Dominant frequency: 1.02 .0Hz
0.4
0
0.2
(c)
5
10
15
40
50
20
Time (Sec)
25
Name: Hachinohe
PGA: 0.229 g
Mw (R): 7.5
Dominant frequency: 0.32.1 Hz
0.2
0.2
(d)
0.4
0.4
0
30
Time (Sec)
30
10
20
30
40
Time (Sec)
FIG 3 (a) Northridge Earthquake 1994; (b) Kobe Earthquake 1995; (c) El Centro
Earthquake 1940; (d) Hachinohe Earthquake 1968
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
Dynamic analysis is carried out for a 15storey model in conjunction with class Ee soil
possessing geotechnical characteristics (Vs = 150 m/s and density = 1470 kg/m3)
presented in FIG 1 for two different systems: fixedbase system (structure without soil
medium) and SSI system (structure resting on soil medium considering the interaction
between foundation and soil). For modelling fixedbase system, the four mentioned
earthquakes are applied at the structural foundation; while for SSI system, the
earthquakes are applied at the bedrock level directly. The Australian seismic code
evaluates local site effects based on the properties of the top 30 meters of the soil profile,
due to the fact that the main part of the amplification and attenuation occurs within the
first 30 meters of the soil profile. Therefore, a 30meter soil medium has been
considered in this study.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the dynamic analyses for a 15storey model in terms of base shear,
maximum lateral displacement, interstorey drift and spectral acceleration under the
influence of four earthquake records for fixedbase system and SSI system with different
average undrained shear strength are derived from FLAC3D history records and are
presented and discussed in this section. According to Table 1, the base shear of the
structure accounting for SSI is always less than the base shear of the fixedbase cases
under the corresponding earthquake excitation. For SSI system, it is evident that with the
increase in the average undrained shear strength the structural system experiences
excessive base shear. Take the Northridge earthquake as an example, for average
undrained shear strength of 65 and 105 kPa and the case considering hysteretic damping
only, the maximum base shear were 11200 kN, 18000 kN and 25000 kN, respectively.
ASCE
22
This means that the structure sitting on the soil with undrained shear strength of 105 kPa
experiences up to 60% more base shear in comparison with structure sitting on the soil
with undrained shear strength of 65 kPa. The reason is that less plastic flow occurs
during the excitation of the cases with higher undrained shear strength resulting in less
soil damping. Consequently, more energy transfers through the subsoil to the
superstructure and eventually leaded to the increase in the base shear of the structure
resting on the soft soil medium.
Table 1 Maximum base shear of the structure for different cases
Earthquake
Northridge
Kobe
ElCentro
Hachinohe
Su=65 kPa
11200
14400
10100
9450
Su=75 kPa
13000
15800
11800
11300
Su=85 kPa
14900
17700
12700
12500
Excluding Su
25000
23000
13700
13600
Fixedbase
36653
36127
14345
13727
Table 2 and Figure 4 present the maximum interstorey drifts and lateral displacements
of the superstructure under the applied earthquakes, respectively. This data was based on
the lateral deformation of each storey when maximum defection at the top level occurs
because, as Hokmabadi et al. (2012) stated, this approach gives a more reasonable
pattern of structural deformation compared to the approach where maximum absolute
storey deformation irrespective of the time they occurred were recorded. Accordingly,
the seismic response of the SSI system amplifies in comparison with the fixedbased
structure, in terms of maximum lateral displacements and interstorey drifts due to the
rocking in the soilstructure system. Take the Northridge earthquake as an example, for
average undrained shear strength of 65 and 105 kPa and the case considering hysteretic
damping only, the maximum interstorey drifts were 1.43%, 2.06% and 2.84%,
respectively. This means that the structures sitting on the soil with undrained shear
strength of 105 kPa experiences almost one and half times of interstorey drifts in
comparison with structure sitting on the same soil with less undrained shear strength.
Although the shear wave velocity (or Gmax) is constant, the performance of soil is
significantly impacted by the average undrained shear strength due to the additional
amount of natural damping triggered by the plastic flow.
Table 2 Maximum interstorey drift reported for different cases
Earthquake
Northridge
Kobe
ElCentro
Hachinohe
Su=65 kPa
1.43
1.46
0.83
0.77
Su=75 kPa
1.67
1.57
0.84
0.81
Excluding Su
2.84
2.00
0.92
0.85
Fixedbase
1.10
1.42
0.48
0.36
ASCE
23
considering SSI have been amplified, which further indicates that structures having
relatively long natural periods are vulnerable to the effect of SSI. This can be explained
referring to the conservation of energy concept. Accordingly, in relatively strong soil
medium (i.e. high Su value), soil experiences less plastic deformation and eventually less
natural damping has been created. Therefore, more energy transfers into the foundation
of the superstructure resulting in the amplification of the developed base shear and in
turn the foundation rocking and structural lateral displacements.
15
15
(b)
10
Fixedbase
65 kPa
75 kPa
85 kPa
95 kPa
105 kPa
Excluding Su
Northridge
0
0
200
400
600
Storey Level
Storey Level
(a)
800
1000
1200
10
Kobe
0
1400
200
400
600
800
1000
15
15
(d)
10
Fixedbase
65 kPa
75 kPa
85 kPa
95 kPa
105 kPa
Excluding Su
El Centro
0
0
50
100
150
200
Storey Level
(c)
Storey Level
Fixedbase
65 kPa
75 kPa
85 kPa
95 kPa
105 kPa
Excluding Su
250
300
350
10
Fixedbase
65 kPa
75 kPa
85 kPa
95 kPa
105 kPa
Excluding Su
Hachinohe
0
400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
FIG 4 Maximum lateral displacement: (a) Northridge Earthquake 1994; (b) Kobe
Earthquake 1995; (c) El Centro Earthquake 1940; (d) Hachinohe Earthquake 1968
3
65 kPa
75 kpa
85 kPa
95 kPa
105 kPa
Original
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Period (s)
FIG 5 Spectral accelerations for Kobe earthquake 1995 with 5% damping ratio
under the influence of soil undrained shear strength variation
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, influence of the shear strength of soil on the seismic response of a
moment resisting concrete building has been numerically investigated. A three
dimensional numerical soilstructure model has been developed adopting direct method
of analysis. In order to capture realistic soil nonlinearities for different shear strength,
hysteretic damping has been implemented to simulate backbone curve of the shear
modulus and the damping ratio versus shear strain for soil. Numerical results show that
ASCE
as the shear strength of subsoil increases, while other soil input properties are constant,
the base shear, the maximum lateral displacement and the interstorey drift of the
structure amplifies by up to 60%, 100% and 44%, respectively. It can be concluded that
soil undrained shear strength has considerable effects on the seismic response of midrise building frames resting on soft soil deposits due to soilstructure interaction, and
considering unrealistic shear strength for the soil can considerably alters the predicted
response of the structure. Thus, in order to obtain a reliable numerical prediction, the soil
characteristics (undrained shear strength and plasticity) should be treated with extreme
care while conducting soilstructure interaction analysis.
REFERENCES
ACI31808 (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary
American Concrete Institute.
AS/NZS1170.1 (2002). Structural design actions  part 1: permanent, imposed and
other actions Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Sydney, Australia.
AS1170.4 (2007). Structural design actions  part 4: earthquake actions in Australia.
Standards Australian, Sydney, Australia.
AS3600 (2009). Concrete structures Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Chu, D. (2006). Threedimentional nonlinear dynamic analysis of soilpilestructure
interaction PhD, Washington University.
Fatahi, B. and Tabatabaiefar, S. (2014). Fully nonlinear versus equivalent linear
computation method for seismic analysis of midrise buildings on soft soils
International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 14 (4): 115.
Hokmabadi, A.S. and Fatahi, B., 2015. Influence of foundation type on seismic
performance of buildings considering soilstructure interaction International
Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, p.1550043.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). Assessment of soilpilestructure
interaction influencing seismic response of midrise buildings sitting on floating pile
foundations Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 55: 172186.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B., 2015. Physical Modeling of Seismic SoilPileStructure Interaction for Buildings on Soft Soils International Journal of
Geomechanics, 15(2), doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.19435622.0000396.
ITASCA (2014). FLAC3D version 5.01 Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in three
dimentions, User's Manual Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: Itasca Consulting
Group, Inc.
Kamei, T. and Iwasaki, K. (1995). Evaluation of undrained shear strength of cohesive
soils using a flat dilatometer Soils Found, Vol. 35 (2): 111116.
Karamodin, A.K. and Kazemi, H.H. (2008). Semiactive control of structures using
neuropredictive algorithm for MR dampers Structural Control and Health
Monitoring, Vol. 17 (3): 237253.
Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991). Effects of soil plasticity on cyclic response.
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 117 (1): 89107.
Wegel, R. L. and Walther, H. (1935). Internal dissipation in solids for small cyclic
strains Physics, Vol. 6: 141157.
ASCE
24
25
2D
Geotechnical Software
Abstract: In soilstructure interaction, modeling the soil and structure set is one of the
most important issues in geotechnical and structural field. In this regard, application of
soil mechanic software such as PLAXIS is of particular importance. In this paper, the
performance of PLAXIS in soilstructure interaction is addressed. Frist, beam analysis
results with different support condition were investigated by PLAXIS and compared
with classic structural analysis methods results. Then two building frames, a simple
one story frame and a 17floor, 5 spans frame were modeled and analyzed by PLAXIS
and ETABS. Results of PLAXIS had good agreement with the results from classic
equations of structural analysis and ETABS software, suggesting the reliability of
PLAXIS in soilstructure interaction analysis.
Keywords: Soilstructure interaction; Building frame modeling; Validation;
PLAXIS2D; ETABS.
INTRODUCTION
In conventional analysis of structure dynamic, it is usually supposed that the
foundation soil is rigid and elasticity of soil is neglected. In this case, structure
response is under the influence of its own dynamic properties free from elasticity of
soil. This is true when the building is constructed on hard rock, but in cases where the
building is on soft soil, the response is totally different. In this case the structure has
some interaction with soil resulting in some changes in basis movements; this
interaction is mutual and known as soilstructure interaction. This interaction
significantly changes the structure response. Lamb investigated elastic vibrations in
1904 which is considered as a start for soil dynamics. Based on Lamb studies,
Reissner (1936) studied circular rigid foundation vibrations on elastic soil which is
known as the beginning for soilstructure interaction. Hokmabadi et al. (2014) studied
the effects of the seismic soilpilestructure interaction (SSPSI) on the dynamic
response of buildings. it is observed that the SSPSI amplifies the maximum lateral
deflections and in turn interstory drifts of the structures supported by endbearing pile
foundations in comparison with the fixedbase structures. Fatahi et al. (2014)
investigated the soilpile interactive performance under lateral loads. In case of soft
ASCE
26
clay, it has been observed that lateral loads on piles can initiate the formation of a gap,
soil heave and the tension crack in the vicinity of the soil surface and the interface,
whereas in medium dense sand, a semielliptical depression zone can develop.
The analysis of soilstructure interaction can be classified into two main categories,
including direct and multistep methods. In the direct method, the whole structurefoundationsoil system is analyzed in a single step. An example of it is finite element
method. The main advantages of this method are the capability of considering the
nonlinear behavior of materials of soil and structures, and modeling the complex
geometries (Wolf 1985).
Investigation of soilstructure interaction is an important issue which could not be
neglected; therefore soilstructure set modeling is a crucial item in geotechnical and
structural field. In this content, soil mechanic software for numerical modeling which
has also geotechnical and structural modeling features, are in priority. In this study,
the performance of PLAXIS software is investigated. First its performance was
evaluated for modeling a simple building frame and then a 17floor frame was
modeled.
1.
In order to validate the software in modeling one span beam, two problems were
considered: 1) beam with simple support condition and 2) beam with double cantilever
support condition. Two different loading including load concentrated at the midspan
and distributed loading were also considered. For comparison of the settlements and
moment values, classical equations of structural analysis were used. The
characteristics of the beam are listed in table 1.
Table 1. Beam Properties for Modeling and Analysis
Concrete
Load
Inertial Cross
size
elastic
Length
Beam type
moment section
(cm) modulus
L (m) Concentrat Distribute
I (m4) A (m2)
E (Pa)
ed (KN) d (KN/m)
Rectangular
0.00265
0.1575
2
100
100
concrete 3545 2.51010
78125
beam
The properties of table 1 were considered for both types of beams. For modeling the
beams with different support conditions in PLAIXIS, an individual region must be
created. As the beams could not been used alone and the soil is necessary for meshing.
A coarse mesh is sufficient. As the initial condition, soil analysis was deactivated,
therefore, only the beams were activated.
11 Beam with simply supported condition
Tthe classical equations of structure analysis used for calculation of maximum
settlement and moment with concentrated and distributed load, according to formulas
(1) to (4).
Fl3
max =
(1) Maximum settlement with concentrated loading
48EI
ASCE
27
5ql4
max =
(2) Maximum settlement with distributed loading
384EI
Fl
(3) Maximum moment with concentrated loading
M max =
4
ql2
(4) Maximum moment with distributed loading
M max =
8
In these equations, max is maximum settlement of beam, Mmax is maximum moment,
F donates concentrated load, q is distributed load, E is elastic modulus, I indicates
inertial moment and L is beam length. Comparison of results of PLAXIS with the
values obtained from classic equations for maximum settlement of the beam with
simple support condition and different loadings are shown in table 2.
Table 2. Comparing the Maximum Settlement under Simple Support Condition
from PLAXIS and Classical Equations of Structural Analysis
max (mm)
Numerical
Analytical
Settlement
difference (mm)
Concentrated
0.281
0.250
0.031
Distributed
0.344
0.313
0.031
Support
Loading state
Simple
Simple
Comparison of results of PLAXIS with the values obtained from classic equations
for maximum moment of the beam with simple support condition and different
loadings are shown in table 3.
Table 3. Comparing the Maximum Moment under Simple Support Condition
from PLAXIS and Classical Equations of Structure Analysis
Support
Loading state
Simple
Simple
Mmax (KN.m/m)
Difference (%)
Numerical
Analytical
Concentrated
50.00
50.00
0.00
Distributed
50.00
50.00
0.00
ASCE
Fl3
192 EI
ql4
max =
384 EI
Fl
M max =
8
max =
28
ql2
M max =
(8) Maximum moment with distributed loading
12
The parameters were previously introduced. Comparison of results of PLAXIS with
the values obtained from classic equations for maximum settlement of the beam with
double cantilever support condition and different loadings are shown in table 4.
Comparison of results of PLAXIS with the values obtained from classic equations for
maximum moment of the beam with double cantilever support condition and different
loadings are shown in table 5.
Table 4. Comparing the Maximum Settlement under Double cantilever Support
Condition from PLAXIS and Classical Equations of Structure Analysis
max (mm)
Numerical
Analytical
Settlement
difference (mm)
Concentrated
0.093
0.062
0.031
Distributed
0.093
0.062
0.031
Support
Loading state
Double cantilever
Double cantilever
Loading state
Double cantilever
Double cantilever
Mmax (KN.m/m)
Difference (%)
Numerical
Analytical
Concentrated
25.00
25.00
0.00
Distributed
33.33
33.33
0.00
For example, plot of bending moment and deformation of double cantilever beam
according to numerical equations are illustrated in figure 1 and 2.
By comparing the results of the software with classical equations of structure, for
both types of beams and different support conditions little difference can be seen so
accuracy of the results of the software is confirmed.
.
ASCE
29
2.
INVESTIGATING THE PERFORMANCE OF PLAXIS IN BUILDING
FRAME MODELING
After assurance about the software performance in onespan beam modeling, a
building frame was modeled and the results were compared with ETABS data. For
applying the effect of structure, the most accurate method is modeling in the form of
building frame, as the real results depend on the weight, geometry and stiffness of the
structure.
21 Onefloor one span bending frame
The properties of the concrete bending frame are listed in table 6. Internal forces of
the frame components are obtained for predefined nodes.
Table 6. Frame Properties for Modeling and Analysis
Column size (cm)
5050
2.51010
Frame geometry
Repeating distances, perpendicular to
Width (m)
Height (m)
plane (m)
8.2
8
6
Floor system: concrete slab
Load distribute
Dead load(Kg/m2)
One way
400
The important point in building frame modeling with PLAXIS is that according to
plain strain, the components stiffness must be divided on the framed distance, and the
stiffness versus width unit should be included in calculation. It is evident that the alive
and dead loads should also be entered to calculation as the weight per unit width.
In modeling the frame with PLAXIS to create geometry the space between the
components must be defined as a cluster and a material (soil) would be allocated to
this cluster. In continue and at the beginning of analysis this cluster is disabled, so it
has no effect on the result of analysis. Also the method of meshing this cluster affects
the results accuracy and proper elements should be used for initial meshing.
a)
Bending moment of frame components
Bending moments of the specified 5 nodes, obtained from two softwares are listed in
table 7. Their distributions are shown in figure 3 and 4. Good agreement of the results
indicates the ability of PLAXIS in analysis of building frames.
30
1
80.320
80.350
0.03
2
163.931
163.941
6.1E3
3
129.973
129.959
0.01
4
163.931
163.941
6.1E3
5
80.320
80.350
0.03
b)
Shearing force of frame components
Shearing forces of the specified 4 nodes obtained by two software are listed in table
8. Their distributions are shown in figure 5 and 6. Good agreement of the results
indicates the ability of PLAXIS software in analyzing the building frames.
PLAXIS
ETABS
Difference (%)
40.71
40.72
0.02
2
Beam
146.952
146.950
1.36E3
3
Column
40.71
40.72
0.02
Beam
146.952
146.950
1.36E3
Column
40.71
40.72
0.02
40.71
40.72
0.02
c)
Deformations
Maximum settlement was observed in the middle of beam equal to 9.89 mm and 10
mm for PLAXIS and ETABS, respectively. The difference is negligible (0.11 mm).
Deflection diagrams are shown in figure 7 and 8.
31
Column
size (cm)
5050
Loading due to concrete slab with the thickness of 15 cm was considered 400 kg/m2.
At the presence of alive loads, they could be considered as additional weight of the
beams. Here, the applied loads are expressed as weight per width unit and the bending
stiffness of the beams and columns were divided on frames distances. In static analysis
there is no difference between loads modeling in the form of overload or beams
weight increase, but in dynamic analysis the over loads should be modeled as beams
mass increase. Also for creation of rigid floor condition, the axial stiffness of the
beams should be increased significantly. In structural analysis, the effect of (P)
should also be considered which is formed due to perpendicular loads on the deformed
structure and result in lateral movement increase of the floors, shear and moment of
the components. In PLAXIS the option of update mesh is selected to include this
effect. Because, this option updates coordinates of the nodes in each step regarding
deformations. There was a comparison made on the results with or without
consideration of (P) effect. For validation of PLAXIS results for modeling of
building frame a beam and two columns were selected as shown in figure 9.
Maximum bending moment, shear force and settlements of the analyzed beam with
PLAXIS and ETABS can be observed in table 10. The comparison of the results
verifies the capability of PLAXIS in analysis of building frames.
ASCE
32
Table 10. Maximum Bending Moment, Shear Force and Settlement the Beam
PLAXIS
ETABS
PLAXIS with (P)
ETABS with (P)
Bending moment
(KN.m)
157.88
156.40
158.13
156.528
Shearing force
(KN)
134.09
134.72
134.14
134.75
Settlement
(m)
0.031
0.032
0.030
0.032
Maximum bending moment, shear force and deflections of the analyzed columns
with PLAXIS and ETABS can be observed in table 11. The comparison of the results
indicates accepted accuracy of PLAXIS in analysis of building frames.
Table 11.Maximum Bending Moment, Shear Force and Deflections for Columns
Axial force (KN)
Bending moment (KN.m)
Column 1
Column 2
Column 1
Column 2
PLAXIS
2460
4290
45.50
17.52
ETABS
2531
4196
44.32
17.78
PLAXIS with (P)
2450
4290
45.56
17.73
ETABS with (P)
2530
4196
44.47
18.27
Comparing the Values of static analysis in PLAXIS and ETABS software in Tables
10 and 11 indicates the sufficient accuracy of the software.
CONCLUSIONS
For application of soilstructure interaction effect, generally soil mechanic software
are used. In this study, the verification of the results obtained by PLAXIS geotechnical
software in modeling of structural frames based on theoretical equation of structural
analysis and ETABS software were investigated. By studying the results, it can be said
that PLAXIS has the capability to analyze building frames. This is highly important in
soilstructure analysis.
REFERENCES
ASCE/SEI 710 (2010). "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures."
American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia.
Fatahi, B., Basack, S., Ryan, P., Zhou, W.H., and Khabbaz, H. (2014). "Performance
of laterally loaded piles considering soil and interface parameters." Geomechanics and
Engineering, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 495524.
Hick, T.G. (2009). "Civil Engineering Formulas." McGrawHill, USA.
Hokmabadi, A., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2014). "Physical modeling of seismic soilpilestructure interaction for buildings on soft soils." International Journal of
Geomechanics, vol. 15, no. 2; 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.19435622.0000396).
Lamb, H. (1904). "On the Propagation of Tremors over the Surface of an Elastic
Solid." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A,
Containing Papers of aMathematical or Physical Character., Vol. 203: p.1.
Liao, H.J., Liu, J., Zhao, Y.G. and Xiao, Z.H. (2007). "Analysis of SoilStructure
Interaction with Finite Element Method." Key Engineering Materials Vols. 340341:
12791284.
Wolf, J.P. (1985). "Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction." PrenticeHall Inc, USA.
ASCE
33
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi
110016, India. Email: sanjit.jal@gmail.com
2
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi
110016, India. Email: bmanna@civil.iitd.ac.in
Abstract: Forced vertical vibration tests have been performed in the field on the 2 2
pile group (l/d = 35, s/d = 3) made of hollow steel pipes embedded in clayey silt and
nonlinear frequencyamplitude curves are obtained for four different eccentric
moments. The soilpile separation lengths of the pile group are also measured for
different eccentric moments. The numerical analysis has been performed by
continuum approach of Novak and the analytical nonlinear frequencyamplitude
responses of the pile group are compared with the experimental results. It is observed
from the comparison curves that the nonlinear frequencyamplitude response obtained
from the analysis have a very close match with the field nonlinear response curves.
INTRODUCTION
Prediction of the nonlinear characteristics of the pile groups under machine induced
vibratory force is still a challenging task to the designers. Most of the previous designs
of the pile groups have been limited to smallamplitude vibration or linear vibration.
However, many failures of the machine foundations have raised concerns about linear
approaches used for the design of pile foundations. Therefore, there is need to include
the effect of soil nonlinearities and soilpile gaping in the design of pile foundations
subjected to rotating machine induced vibrations.
Among different methods proposed in the literature to estimate the nonlinear
response of the pile foundations, the continuum approach is the most popular and
reliably used method. Novak et al. (1978) estimated the dynamic soil stiffness
considering plane strain case of an embedded cylindrical body under different modes
of harmonic motion. To include the nonlinear behavior of soil, Novak and Sheta
(1980) proposed a cylindrical boundary zone around the pile having lesser shear
modulus and more damping compared to the outer free field. Based on the
superposition method, Novak and Mitwally (1990) obtained an approximate but
efficient solution for determination of the complex stiffness of pile groups for different
ASCE
modes of vibration. The effectiveness of the proposed analytical methods are also
verified by many researchers with the help of experimental investigations. Novak and
Grigg (1976) conducted dynamic tests on small pile foundations in the field and the
results are compared with the analytical results. Han and Novak (1988) conducted
dynamic field tests on large scale model piles under strong horizontal and vertical
excitations. Similar kind of field study was also performed by Manna and Baidya
(2010) on small pile groups to determine the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the
pile foundations under vertical vibration. The behavior of the pile group supported
buildings under seismic loading was also studied by Hokmabadi et. al. (2014, 2015)
using the experimental results of shaking table test and numerical analysis.
From the literature review, it is observed that studies related to the estimation of soil
parameters responsible for the nonlinear response of the pile foundation are very
rarely performed. Therefore in this study, vertical vibration field tests are performed
on a 2 2 pile group (l/d = 35, s/d = 3) under a static load of 15 kN to measure the
soilpile separation lengths for different excitation forces. Theoretical study has been
performed by continuum approach using experimental results to predict the possible
variation of nonlinear soil parameters of the 2 2 pile group.
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
Site Characterization
The test site is located in between Block II and III at Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India. The standard penetration tests (SPT) are
performed in the field at every 1 m interval up to a depth of 6 m and simultaneously
disturbed and undisturbed soil samples are collected for laboratory testing. Various
laboratory tests such as bulk density, natural water content, particle size distribution
and Atterbergs limits tests are carried out on collected soil samples. Based on all the
soil data, the vertical soil profile has been classified into two different soil layers as
per Unified Soil Classification System. The first layer is classified as inorganic clayey
silt with low plasticity (MLCL) up to a depth of 3 m followed by inorganic gravely
silt with low plasticity (ML) soil. Seismic crosshole tests are also conducted in the
field at every 1 m interval depth to obtain the shear wave velocity of soil. All the soil
properties obtained from the field and laboratory tests are listed in Table 1.
Construction of Pile Group
Hollow steel pipes of 6.0 m in length and outer diameter (d) of 0.166 m (thickness =
7 mm) has been used as piles for dynamic field testing. For end bearing resistance,
circular plates of 0.16 m diameter are welded to the bottom of the pipes. For installing
the piles undersize boreholes are made at 3d spacing with a helical auger of 0.15 m
diameter to ensure a good contact between the pile and soil. The modulus of elasticity
and Poissons ratio of the steel piles are 200 GPa and 0.2 respectively. To measure the
separation between the pile and soil, four pressure sensors of 4 mm diameter and 0.14
mm thickness are attached at the outer surface of a pile with adhesive tapes at an
ASCE
34
35
interval of 0.1 m. After attaching the sensors, the piles are driven up to a depth of (l)
5.8 m into the boreholes with a hammer. A steel pile cap of dimension 0.8 m 0.8 m
0.03 m is connected with the pile by specially fabricated pile cap connectors.
Table 1. Properties of Soil with Depth
Water
Content
(%)
11.33
Wet
Density
(kN/m3)
17.05
13.27
3
4
LL
(%)
PL
(%)


18.03
25.1
19.0
13.39
13.70
18.85
18.78


14.62
19.03
24.5
21.1
14.17
19.68


Depth
(m)
Grain Size
Corrected Vs
Distribution
SPTN (m/s)
(%)
11
84
Sand = 30.3, Silt =
11
87
58.8, Clay = 10.9
16
92
29
103
Gravel = 4.5, Sand
= 35.6, Silt = 51.2,
33
109
Clay = 8.7
35
113
ASCE
loose and gradually separated from the pile during the vibration. The contact pressure
between the pile and soil become zero under dynamic loading up to the separated
length. A typical time versus contact pressure curves are presented in Fig. 3. From the
timecontact pressure data the frequency versus maximum contact pressure has been
obtained for all the sensors at steadystate to find the separation length between the
pile and soil under a particular eccentric force. A typical frequency versus maximum
contact pressure curve of the pile group is presented in Fig. 4. From the figure, it is
observed that the maximum contact pressure reading of the 0.1 m sensor is vanished at
the resonant frequency of 38.75 Hz. From this observation, it can be concluded that
the 0.1 m pressure sensor is separated from the adjacent soil under that particular
eccentric moment. Hence, the soilpile separation length is considered 0.1 m under
that eccentric force (W.e = 2.721 Nm).
FIG. 1. Dynamic test setup of the pile group for vertical vibration.
ASCE
36
FIG. 3. Typical time versus contact pressure response for different frequencies.
FIG. 4. Frequency versus maximum contact pressure curves for different depths.
THEORETICAL STUDY
A computer software called DYNA5 (Novak et al. 1999) is used to determine the
nonlinear response of pile foundation based on the continuum approach of Novak and
superposition method. The response of the single pile is calculated using the
continuum approach (Novak and AboulElla 1978). The dynamic response of the pile
group is evaluated by superposition method of Novak and Mitwally (1990) using the
dynamic interaction factors of individual piles (Kaynia and Kausel 1982). To obtain
the nonlinear response of the soilpile system an equivalent nonlinear soil model is
incorporated in the analysis (Novak and Sheta 1980) by considering a cylindrical
annulus boundary zone around the pile with lesser soil modulus and higher damping
than outer zone. In this soil model the linearelastic behavior of soil is considered
although the stiffness of the soil model can be reduced by incorporating the boundary
zone around the pile. Therefore, the effect of soil nonlinearly on the dynamic pile
response can be effectively simulated using this soil model. In this study the shear
ASCE
37
modulus, thickness, damping ratio of the boundary zone is considered as Gm, tm, Dm
respectively. The shear modulus of soil is represented as G and the radius of the pile is
represented as R.
Boundary Zone Parameters
The equivalent nonlinear analyses have been performed by incorporating the
parameters like shear modulus reduction factor (Gm/G), weak zone soil damping (Dm),
thickness ratio (tm/R) and most importantly soilpile separation lengths. These
parametric values are kept constant during the analysis for a particular eccentric
moment. Based on the literatures (Elkasabgy and El Naggar 2013, Han and Novak
1988, Manna and Baidya 2010) the boundary zone parameters are adjusted for
different eccentric moments in a way that the theoretical response curves approach the
vertical vibration test results. The soilpile separation lengths obtained from the
dynamic field tests are used in the analysis. The shear modulus reduction ratio (Gm/G)
is considered as zero up to the separation lengths from the ground level. The natural
soil damping factor is assumed as 0.1 for all the soil layers. The variations of the
boundary zone parameters with depth for different excitation levels are shown in Fig.
5. From the figure, it is found that the shear modulus reduction ratio (Gm/G) are
reduced whereas the weak zone soil damping (Dm) and the thickness ratio (tm/R) are
increased as the excitation intensity increases due to the progression of the boundary
zone with the increase of eccentric moments. It is also noticed that the shear modulus
reduction ratio (Gm/G) is increased but the weak zone soil damping (Dm) and the
thickness ratio (tm/R) are decreased with depth for all excitation level.
38
ASCE
Both experimental and analytical responses of the 2 2 pile group are found
nonlinear under rotating machine induced vertical vibration.
The pile transfers the applied load to the adjacent soil in the sinusoidal pattern as
the contact pressure between the pile and soil is observed sinusoidal.
In this study the maximum separation length of the 2 2 pile group is found 0.1
m under the maximum dynamic force.
39
4.
5.
The nonlinear response of the pile group can be efficiently predicted by the
continuum approach with proper variation of the boundary zone parameters.
The complex vertical stiffness of the pile foundation is decreased with the
increase in excitation intensity due to the expansion of the weak boundary zone
with the excitation levels.
REFERENCES
Elkasabgy, M. and El Naggar, M.H. (2013). Dynamic response of vertically loaded
helical and driven steel piles. Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 50: 521535.
Han, Y. and Novak, M. (1988). Dynamic behavior of single piles under strong
harmonic excitation. Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 25: 523534.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2014). Assessment of soilpilestructure
interaction influencing seismic response of midrise buildings sitting on floating
pile foundations. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 55: 172186.
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2015). Physical modeling of seismic
soilpilestructure interaction for buildings on soft soils. Int. J. of Geomech., Vol.
15 (2): 04014046.
Kaynia, A.M. and Kausel, E. (1982). Dynamic behavior of pile groups. Procedings
of 2nd International Conference on Numerical Methods of Offshore Piling, Texas:
509532.
Manna, B. and Baidya, D.K. (2010). Dynamic nonlinear response of pile foundations
under vertical vibration  theory versus experiment. Soil Dyn. and Earthquake
Eng., Vol. 30: 456469.
Novak, M. and AboulElla, F. (1978). Impedance functions for piles embedded in
layered medium. J. of Eng. Mech., Vol. 104(3): 643661.
Novak, M., El Naggar, M.H., Sheta, M., El Hifnawy, L., El Marsafawi, H. and
Ramadan, O. (1999). DYNA5  A computer program for calculation of foundation
response to dynamic loads. Geotechnical Research Centre, University of Western
Ontario, London.
Novak, M. and Grigg, R.F. (1976). Dynamic experiments with small pile
foundations. Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 13: 372385.
Novak, M. and Mitwally, H. (1990). Random response of offshore towers with pilesoilpile interaction. J. of Offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng., Vol. 112: 3541.
Novak, M., Nogami, T. and AboulElla, F. (1978). Dynamic soil reactions for plane
strain case. J. of Eng. Mech., Vol. 104(4): 953959.
Novak, M. and Sheta, M. (1980). Approximate approach to contact problems of
piles. Proceedings of Dynamic Response of Pile Foundations: Analytical Aspects
M ONeill et al Eds., New York: 5379.
ASCE
40
41
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity
Univ., Sector125, Noida201313, UP. Email: rsaggu@amity.edu
2
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, Hauz
Khas, New Delhi 110016. Email: tanusree@civil.iitd.ac.in
Abstract: The load transfer mechanism of the geothermal energy piles involves
thermal soilstructure interaction. In the present work, pilesoil interaction is
investigated for the energy piles using axisymmetric nonlinear finite element analysis
procedure. For the analyses carried out herein, the stressstrain response of piles is
considered to be linearelastic. The stressstrain response of sand is simulated using
state parameter based constitutive model CASM. The CASM model is implemented
in finite element software Abaqus through user material subroutine. Floating
geothermal energy piles of different lengths and diameters in sand are analyzed under
allowable axial loading and thermal loading. Two types of sands namely Ottawa sand
and Toyoura sand are considered for analyses. The shear stress in soil at the pilesoil
interface is studied. In addition, parametric sensitivity studies are performed by
varying relative density of sand and coefficient of earth pressure of sand. It has been
observed from the results that pile length, relative density of the soil and the axial
load magnitude are the key parameters in deciding the loaddisplacement response of
geothermal energy piles subjected to thermomechanical loading. Moreover, the soil
particle shape and size also affect the magnitude of shear stress in soil at pilesoil
interface. Negative shear stress generates at the pilesoil interface when subjected to
thermal loading which causes the drag load on the pile.
INTRODUCTION
Reinforced concrete drilled shafts are often used more effectively as geothermal
energy piles due to easy installation of highdensity polyethylene plastic pipes
attached to the reinforcement cage which circulates the heat carrier fluid. In current
geotechnical practice, the design of the geothermal energy piles depends profoundly
on empirical equations (Laloui et al. 2006) and uses very high values of factor of
safety which is truly uneconomical. Hence, there is need to understand and quantify
the load transfer mechanism of energy piles under thermal and mechanical loads
through rigorous numerical analysis. In literature, both centrifuge and full scale
experiments on energy piles have been performed by many researchers to study the
thermomechanical behavior of the energy piles. Peron et al. (2011) discussed that
ASCE
interaction between pile and soil upon thermal loading of pile and stated that
generation of negative shear stress at the pilesoil interface should be incorporated in
the design of energy piles. Stewart and McCartney (2014) performed centrifuge
modeling of energy foundations and have reported higher thermal axial stress near the
toe of the foundation. Saggu and Chakraborty (2015a, 2015b) have investigated
numerically the thermomechanical response of geothermal energy piles and they
noted that the thermal load and soil internal friction angle play an important role in
deciding the pile behavior. However, rigorous finite element (FE) analysis based
predictions for the shear stresses at pilesoil interface for the floating energy piles in
sand under thermomechanical loading are currently rare in the literature.
The specific objectives of the present study are (i) to determine the shear stresses in
the soil at pilesoil interface for the piles under allowable axial load and (ii) effect of
soil type on the shear stress. In order to accomplish the objectives mentioned above,
axisymmetric nonlinear finite element (FE) analyses of geothermal energy piles have
been performed herein using the FE software Abaqus (Abaqus Manual Version 6.11).
Numerical investigations have been performed by varying (i) the relative density (DR)
of soil, (ii) the coefficient of lateral earth pressure at rest (K0), (iii) the length of pile
(LP), (iv) the diameter of pile (B) and (v) different sand types. The pile has been
assumed to behave linear elastically. The soil behavior has been simulated with a
critical state soil mechanics based constitutive model CASM (Yu 2006). The
constitutive model has been incorporated in Abaqus through a user defined material
subroutine, e.g. UMAT for defining the mechanical stressstrain behavior of soil and
a user defined material subroutine, e.g. UMATHT for defining the thermal soil
parameters. The temperature change on pile has been assumed to be uniform over the
entire length of the pile (Laloui et al. 2006).
FINITE ELEMENT MODEL AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES
In the present work, the axisymmetric finite element analyses have been performed
using the finite element software Abaqus. The pile and soil geometries are created as
separate parts. The pile is considered to be made of concrete and has been modeled as
linear elastic material with Youngs modulus (E) = 33 GPa and Poissons ratio () =
0.2. The thermal properties of concrete, e.g. thermal conductivity (kc), specific heat
capacity (Cc) and coefficient of thermal expansion (c) are considered as 2.1 W/mC,
800 Joule/C and 105/C, respectively. For sandy soil, two types of sands namely
Ottawa sand and Toyoura sand are considered in all the analyses. The sand
surrounding the pile is modeled with critical state soil mechanics based material
constitutive model CASM. The vertical farfield soil boundary in the model has been
placed at a distance of fifteen times the pile diameter from the pilesoil interface and
the bottom soil boundary is placed at a distance of one pile length from the bottom of
the pile. The farfield soil boundary has been restrained in horizontal direction and the
bottom soil boundary has been restrained in vertical and horizontal directions. Among
the thermal boundary conditions, heat flow has been allowed through the farfield
side and the bottom boundaries of the mesh. A constant temperature of 15C has been
assumed at the top soil boundary. Heat flux is assumed to be zero along the axis of
symmetry. The ambient ground temperature has been assumed to be 15C (Laloui et
ASCE
42
43
al. 2006). The analysis domain has been discretized using four node axisymmetric
thermally coupled quadrilateral, bilinear displacement and temperature elements
(CAX4T) for the soil as well as for the pile. A refined mesh has been used near the
pilesoil interface with the minimum element size (ts) of 0.075 mm in soil. The
maximum element size has been taken as 0.15 mm at the farfield regions. The
Ottawa sand used in the present study (designated as ASTM C778) is a mediumsized
silica sand with round to subround particles, with D50 = 0.39 mm. Toyoura sand is
fine subangular to angular silica sand with D50 = 0.19 mm. The interface between the
pile and the soil surfaces has been modeled as frictional contact in the tangential
direction with a coefficient of friction (= tan) between soil and concrete of 0.55. In
the normal direction between the pile and soil, hard contact with zero penetration has
been considered. Heat conduction between pile and soil has been made possible by
defining a gap conductance value equal to the soil thermal conductivity. In the present
study, a FORTRAN code has been written for drained and undrained triaxial
compression test simulation for the determination of the CASM model parameters.
Herein, the model parameters have been determined for Ottawa sand with minimum
void ratio emin = 0.48 and maximum void ratio emax = 0.78 and for Toyoura sand emin =
0.6 and emax = 0.98. The values of the sand parameters are given in Table 1. The
thermal constitutive model is implemented in Abaqus through user defined material
subroutine UMATHT.
Table 1. Material parameters used for Ottawa sand and Toyoura sand
Mechanical parameters
Slope of critical state line in eln(p') space,
Slope of unloadingreloading line
in eln(p') space,
Critical state line intercept at 1 kPa
pressure,
Reference state parameter, R
Model parameter, n
Slope of critical state line in qp'
space, Mcc
Poissons ratio, s
Shear modulus, G (MPa)
Bulk modulus, K (MPa)
Thermal Parameters
Thermal conductivity, ks (W/mC)
Specific heat, Cs (Joule/C)
Coefficient of thermal expansion,
s (/C)
ASCE
Sand type
Ottawa Toyoura
0.02
0.019
Reference
Loukidis (2006)
0.005
0.005
Yu (2006)
0.8
0.934
Model simulation
0.075
4.5
1.2
0.075
4.5
1.27
0.3
32.6
15
0.15
35
31.9
Yu (2006)
Model simulation
Yu (2006), Loukidis
(2006)
Yu (2006)
Yu (2006)
Murthy et al. (2006)
0.274
722
104
0.235
677
104
Tarnawski et al.
(2009)
ASCE
44
45
12
200
9
900
6
600
3
300
0
10
10
20
2
50
6
600
50
0
5000
10
0
4000
2000
1000
0
15
5
B = 1.0
0m
20
0
60
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
3000
8
50% 70% 85%
LP = 15
5m
0
12
200
10
85%
50% 70%
7
Shea
ar stress (kPa
a)
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
18
800
15
50
700
LP = 20 m
B = 0.5 m
(d) 0
24
400
Axial load (kN)
Depth (m)
(c)
1400
15
50 10
00 150 200 250
Shear strress (kPa)
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
2100
B = 0.5 m
0
2800
LP = 15 m
15
50
3500
Axial load (kN)
(b) 0
15
500
0
Axial load (kN)
Depth (m)
(a)
50% 70%
85%
7
LP = 20 m
B = 1.0 m
0
60
0 120 180 240 300
Shea
ar stress (kPa
a)
DR
K0
DR
K0
DR
K0
50%
50%
0.5
1.0
70%
70%
0.5
1.0
85%
85%
0.5
1.0
FIG
G. 1. Shear stress
s
in soiil at pilesoill interface ffor the piless under
thermomechanical lo
oading at alllowable axiial load
ASCE
46
Higher
H
increaase in the drrag load is observed
o
forr longer pilees. The increease in drag
load
d becomes significantly
s
y high, almosst 9095% aat K0 = 1.0 w
which may bbe attributed
to the
t higher ax
xial expansion the longeer piles (Sagggu and Chaakraborty 20015a). Thus,
it iss concluded that the soill relative den
nsity and pille length conntrols the m
magnitude off
drag load. Thee drag load
d for the cases considdered hereinn is not of significant
mag
gnitude as the
t piles aree loaded to their
t
maxim
mum capacityy. Howeverr, it may be
noted that the piles loaded as per thee static requuirements oof the buildiing and the
beaaring capacitty of the un
nderlying soil may undeergo high m
magnitude off drag load.
Thee applied ax
xial load and
d drag load should be inn equilibrium
m with sum of positive
shaaft friction an
nd the toe reesistance of the pile. Forr design purrpose, the neegative skin
fricction which causes
c
the drrag load on the
t pile shouuld be taken into consideeration.
D
Drag
lload
d on th
the pile
il (kN)
(a)
( 60
LP = 15 m
(b) 50
B = 0.5 m
LP = 15
5m
B = 1.0
0m
20
40
90
60
20
30
0
40
60
0
40
80
(d)
150
120
LP = 20 m
B = 0.5 m
350
280
90
210
60
140
30
70
0
40
80
Relative dens
sity (%)
(c)
60
LP = 20
2 m
B = 1.0
1 m
0
40
0
60
80
Relative den
nsity (%)
Drag load
K0 = 0.5
60
0
80
0
Relative
e density (%)
K0 = 1.0
FIG. 2. Drag
D
load on
o the piles in
i soils with
h different rrelative denssities
EFFECT OF SOIL
S
TYPE
E ON SHEA
AR STRESS
S
To
T understan
nd the effectt of particlee size and pparticle anguularity on shear stress,
anaalyses are performed fo
or the floating piles unnder thermomechanical loading at
ASCE
47
(b) 0
Depth (m)
LP = 15 m
LP = 20 m
5
10
10
15
15
70
70
0
140
Toyourra sand
DR = 85%
DR = 60%
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
K0 = 0.5
5
K0 = 1.0
0
210
20
70
7
70
140
210
Ottawa sand
s
DR = 85%
DR = 60%
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
K0 = 0.5
K0 = 1.0
FIG.
F
3. Shea
ar stress in soil
s at pilessoil interfacce for the piles in differrent sand
types
t
with DR = 60% aand 85%
CO
ONCLUSIONS
Axially
A
load
ded piles un
nder constan
nt mechaniccal load m
magnitude eqqual to the
allo
owable axiaal load and thermal loadingunloaading (heatinngcooling) have been
ASCE
analyzed herein using the finite element code Abaqus and a user defined material
subroutine (UMAT). CASM based on the concepts of the critical state soil mechanics
is used for modeling nonlinear response of soil. The investigation of (i) shear stress
at pilesoil interface, (ii) drag load on the piles, and (iii) effect of soil type on shear
stress have been studied. The following conclusions are drawn from the studies
conducted herein:
1. The shear stress generation at pilesoil interface depends on the relative
movement of the pile and the soil. Soil relative density and magnitude of axial
load at the pile head controls the resultant displacement of the pile.
2. Negative skin friction is higher for longer piles of lesser diameter. Negative
skin friction varies with soil relative density and the coefficient of earth
pressure of the soil.
3. Drag load should be calculated and catered in the design of geothermal energy
piles.
4. The sand particle shape and size affect the magnitude of shear stress in soil at
pilesoil interface due to heating and cooling of the piles.
REFERENCES
Abaqus/Standard Users Manual, Version 6.11, 2011. Dassault Systmes Simulia
Corporation, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Laloui, L., Nuth, M. and Vulliet, L. (2006). Experimental and numerical
investigations of the behavior of a heat exchanger pile. International Journal for
Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 30: 763781.
Loukidis, D. (2006). Advanced constitutive modeling of sands and applications to
foundation engineering. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, USA.
Murthy, T. G., Loukidis, D., Carraro, J. A. H., Prezzi, M. and Salgado R. (2006).
Undrained monotonic response of clean and silty sands. Gotechnique, Vol.
57(3): 273288.
Peron, H., Knellwolf, C. and Laloui, L. (2011). A method for the geotechnical
design of heat exchanger piles. GeoFrontiers, ASCE: 470479.
Saggu, R. and Chakraborty, T. (2015a). Thermal analysis of energy piles in sand.
Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, Vol. 10(1): 1029.
[doi: 10.1080/17486025.2014.923586].
Saggu, R. and Chakraborty, T. (2015b). Cyclic thermomechanical analysis of
energy piles in sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 33: 321342. [doi: 10.1007/s 1070601497988].
Stewart, M. and McCartney, J. (2014). Centrifuge modeling of soilstructure
interaction in energy foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering ASCE, Vol. 140(4): 04013044.
Tarnawski, V. R., Momose, T., Leong, W. H., Bovesecchi, G. and Coppa, P. (2009).
Thermal conductivity of standard sands. Part I. Dry state conditions.
International Journal of Thermophysics, Vol. 30(3): 949968.
Yu, H. S. (2006). Plasticity and Geotechnics. Springer Publishers, New York, USA.
ASCE
48
49
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No.2 Xueyuan Rd., Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350108, Peoples R China. Email: huangfuyun@fzu.edu.cn
2
Graduate Student, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No.2 Xueyuan Rd., Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350108, Peoples R China. Email: 350635311@qq.com
3
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No.2 Xueyuan Rd., Fuzhou, Fujian Province
350108, Peoples R China. Email: 478372092@qq.com
Abstract: Shaking table testing on seismic performance and interaction of PHC pipepiles in saturated soils had been conducted using a series of sine wave, typical
earthquake waves as well as artificial ground motions based on insite. The testing
results involving time histories of ratios of water pore pressure and responding
displacement related to the soils liquefaction were presented. The testing results
indicate that the natural frequency of soilpile system gradually reduced, which means
that the piles are damaged gradually. Moreover, the displacement responses of piles in
saturated soil and unsaturated soil have a little difference that the peak displacements
are larger than that in unsaturated soil. In addition, the prestressed degree is benefit to
the resist the damage. The researches can be used to calibrate FE models and provide a
data base on seismic design of PHC pipe piles.
INTRODUCTION
Prestressed highstrength concrete (PHC) pipepiles are the relatively economic type
of pile foundation that has been commonly used in the coastal softsoil area of China
due to the high axial bearing capacity, convenience of construction and good quality.
However, PHC pipepile belongs to a type of thinwalled concrete member with weak
flexural capacity and shear resistant capability. The damage of PHC pipepiles during
construction and earthquake induced the limit use of PHC pipepiles in liquable soil in
the code of design of building foundation in Fujian Province (Wen & Huang, 2016).
Nevertheless, there are still a number of PHC pipepiles had been used in liquable soil
area, which should be paid more and more attention.
A number of researches on seismic performance of PHC pipepiles had been
conducted in recent years (Takuya 2003; Chung 2007; Rong 2012; Gao 2012; Sun
2012; Li 2013; Mohamed 2013 and Hokmabadi 2014). However, the researches are
lack of considering the effect of liquefaction during earthquake. Wen & Huang (2016)
was tested 3 scaled PHC pipepiles in saturated soil with a heavy counterweight under
ASCE
50
ASCE
51
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Dynamic Characteristics
Through white noise excitation, the acceleration response of PHC soilpilesuperstructure system can be measured in each condition, and then the fundamental
frequency was obtained by FFT transform. It is found that the fundamental frequency
of PHC1 in Condition 1 and Condition 2 were 3.14Hz and 2.28Hz respectively, PHC2
in condition 1 and condition 2 respectively 3.27Hz and 2.65Hz, PHC3 respectively
3.57Hz and 3.13Hz.
Compared with three piles, it can be seen that the different soil conditions (Condition
1 to Condition 2) have obvious different natural frequencies of soilpile system that in
saturated soil is much less than in unsaturated soil (2.28<3.14, 2.65<3.27 and
3.13<3.57). The soil condition has a great influence on dynamic behavior of the PHC
pipepile model. Furthermore, the larger prestress of PHC pipepiles, the larger natural
frequency of soilpile system (3.14<3.27<3.57 and 2.28<2.65<3.13). The existence of
prestress can increase the basic frequency of soilpile system and mitigate the damage.
3.2
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.6
0
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
PHC1
PHC2
PHC3
11
10
Frequency (Hz)
2.8
12
PHC1
PHC2
PHC3
3.0
9
8
7
6
5
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
ASCE
52
2.5
PHC1
PHC2
PHC3
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 3 is the diagrams of peak lateral displacements for the three piles under
different frequencies of sine wave (Case 14), and Fig.3a & b are their results in
unsaturated and saturated soil respectively. From Fig.3a, it can be seen that when the
frequencies of sine wave are approached to natural frequency of the pilesuperstructure
system, the lateral displacement responses are the most obvious in unsaturated soil.
Nevertheless, the response of piles in saturated soil has a little difference. Their peak
displacements are significantly larger than that in unsaturated soil especially PHC1
because the soil is liquefied (it can be seen from Fig 5&6 later).
12
PHC1
PHC2
PHC3
10
8
6
4
2
0
Frequency (Hz)
(a) In unsaturated soil
Frequency (Hz)
(b) In saturated soil
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Artificial Wave
El Centro Wave
Acceleration (g)
(a)PHC2
Artificial Wave
El Centro Wave
Acceleration (g)
(b)PHC3
53
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.0
0
1.2
1.0
1Hz
2Hz
4Hz
0.0
100 200 300 400 500
0
Time (s)
(a) K1
1Hz
2Hz
4Hz
1.0
1Hz
2Hz
4Hz
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Time (s)
(b)K2
0.0
Time (s)
(c)K3
FIG. 5. Timehistory curve of PHC1 pore pressure ratio under sine wave
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
1.4
1.2
1Hz
1.0
2Hz
0.8
4Hz
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
100 200 300 400
0
Time (s)
(a) K1
1.4
1.2
1Hz
1.0
2Hz
4Hz
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
100 200 300 400
Time (s)
(b)K2
1Hz
2Hz
4Hz
Time (s)
(c)K3
FIG. 6. Timehistory curve of PHC2 pore pressure ratio under sine wave
Observing the pore pressure ratio at different depths, pore pressure ratio increased
gradually from top to bottom. The mainly reason is that the pore pressure water at
upper layer is easier to discharge than deeper soil. With the increase of frequency of
sine waves, the pore pressure ratio will be decreased because the faster for the
frequency, the quicker for the dissipation. Comparing Figure 5 and Figure 6, it can be
found that the pore pressure ratio for PHC2 is slightly larger than that of PHC1, but
not much obvious. The reason is that for PHC2, it is covered a clay layer to keep the
pore pressure to decreasing slowly.
Figure 7 and Figure 8 are the pore pressure ratio timehistory curves of PHC1 pile
under the seismic waves of artificial and El Centro, Figure 9 and Figure 10 are the
curves of PHC2. From Figure 7 and Figure 8, it can be found that the loading pore
pressure of artificial wave was larger than El Centro wave under the same peak
acceleration. In addition, the larger the peak acceleration is, the greater the pore
pressure ratio performed correspondingly, and the pore pressure ratio increased
gradually from top to bottom. However, the pore pressure ratio is not too larger to
ASCE
54
liquefy, this mainly because pore water pressure is more likely to discharge without
upper clay layer.
0.16
0.16
0.12
0.12
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.08
0.12
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.08
20
40
60
80
Time (s)
(a) K1
100
0.00
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.16
0.04
0
20
40
60
100 0.000
80
Time (s)
(b)K2
20
40
60
80
100
Time (s)
(c)K3
FIG. 7. Timehistory curve of PHC1 pore pressure ratio under artificial wave
0.12
0.12
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.00
0
0.12
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.04
20
40
60
Time (s)
(a) K1
80
100
0.00
0
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.08
0.04
20
40
60
Time (s)
(b)K2
80
100
0.00
20
40
60
80 100 120
Time (s)
(c)K3
FIG. 8. Timehistory curve of PHC1 pore pressure ratio under El Centro wave
0.8
0.8
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.6
0.8
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0
50
100
150
Time (s)
(a) K1
200
0.0
50
100
Time (s)
150
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.6
200
0.0
0
50
100
Time (s)
(b)K2
150
200
(c)K3
FIG. 9. Timehistory curve of PHC2 pore pressure ratio under artificial wave
0.8
0.8
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.6
0.8
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0
50
100
Time (s)
(a) K1
150
200
0.0
0
50
100
Time (s)
(b)K2
150
0.1656g
0.1242g
0.0828g
200
0.0
0
50
100
Time (s)
(c)K3
150
200
FIG. 10. Timehistory curve of PHC2 pore pressure ratio under El Centro wave
ASCE
55
From Figure 9 and Figure 10, it can be found that when there was overlying a clay
layer, the pore pressure at K1 will be at a later arrival peak than K2 and K3. With the
shaking of the experiment, the lower water moves upward increasing the pore pressure
at K1. It is very obvious to see that the pore pressure at K1 reaches the peak and
dissipate more slowly than K2 and K3. Although the water pressure at shallower depth
is more likely to disappear, deeper water will add to shallow soil to slow the dissipation.
In addition, with the increasing of PGA, the ratio of water pore pressure is also
increasing that the ratio is close to 0.6 and begin to liquefy when the PGA reaches
0.1656g. Comparing with Figures 7 and 8, and Figures 9 and 10, the ratio value and
duration of water pore pressure of later is significantly larger than that of former, where
the reason is the same with a clay layer. Moreover, the ratio duration is also
dramatically larger that that of excitations of seismic wave.
CONCLUSIONS
1) With the continuous vibration, models are damaged, and the natural frequency of
soilpile system gradually reduced, while damping ratio gradually increased. Otherwise,
the prestressed degree is benefit to the resist the damage.
2) The responses of piles in saturated soil and unsaturated soil have a little difference,
and the peak displacements are larger than that in unsaturated soil especially for PHC1.
3) The testing results indicate that with the increasing of frequencies of sine wave, the
pore pressure ratio will gradually decreases correspondingly. The larger the peak
acceleration is, the greater the pore pressure ratio will be accordingly that the ratio is
close to 0.6 and begin to liquefy as the PGA reaches 0.1656g.
4) The pore pressure ratio will increase to a maximum very quickly as the excitation
input, and then will be sustaining around the maximum for a period of time until
decreases to zero. Its duration is far larger than that of excitations. Covered a clay layer
can help the pore pressure to decreasing slowly and increase the value of ratio to easier
liquefaction.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors appreciate the support of
China(No:51578161, 51278126, 2010Y0101).
Natural
Science
Foundation
of
REFERENCES
Chung, SG. and Kim, SR. (2007). "Appraisal of true resistance of phc pipepiles
driven in thick soft deposit." 2007 International Forum on Strategic Technology :
109112.
DBJ13072006 Code for Design of Building foundation (2006).
Gao A. (2012). Experimented research on seismic performance of PHC pipe pile and
analysis of bearing capacity. Tianjin University, Dissertation.
Hokmabadi, A. S. Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). "Physical modeling of seismic soilpilestructure interaction for buildings on soft soils." International Journal of
Geomechanics, Vol. 15(2).
Hokmabadi, A. S. Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). "Assessment of soilpilestructure
interaction influencing seismic response of midrise buildings sitting on floating pile
foundations. " Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 55: 172186.
ASCE
Li, Y.C. Xing, K.Y. Liu, H. et al. (2013). "Experimental study of seismic performance
of PHC pipe pile considering soilpilestructure interaction." Chinese Journal of
Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 32 (2): 401410.
Motamed, R. Towhata, I. Honda, T. Tabata, K. and Abe, A. (2013). "Pile group
response to liquefactioninduced lateral spreading: edefense large shake table test. "
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 3546.
Nagae T., Hayashi S. (2003). Earthquakeresistant property of prefabricated highstrength concrete pile. ASCE, High Performance Materials in Bridges, 2003:173182.
Rong, X. Xu, XZ. Li, YY. (2012). "Experimental research on aseismic behavior of
PHC pipe piles." Industrial Construction, Vol. 43 (7): 7275.
Sun, Ye. and Liu, Zuhua. (2012). "Strain distributing disciplinarian of phc pipepiles
under seismic action." Low Temperature Architecture Technology, Vol. 165: 2427.
Wen, X.W. Huang, F.Y. Zheng, JS. et al. (2016). Experiment on seismic failure mode
of PHC pipepiles in liquefiable soil under Shaking Table. GEOChina.
ASCE
56
57
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins Univ., 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore,
MD 21218. Email: ryaghma2@jhu.edu
2
Ph.D., Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flager
St., Miami, FL 33174.
58
(1)
(2)
Where c0ij represents the material property value at z = 0 and is a positive real
valued exponent defining the gradation of the soil in depth. The consistency condition
for the material parameters can be obtained as
c ( z ) > 0 for = 11,33, 23,12 and c11 ( z ) c33 ( z ) c132 ( z ) c33 ( z ) c12 ( z ) > 0 (3)
ASCE
59
The halfspace is consists of two regions denoted as region I (0 < z < s) and region II
(z > s). An arbitrary harmonic load applied on an arbitrary surface at z = s is
considered as the excitation induced by the propagating stress waves in the domain.
The representing equilibrium equation for the domain is obtained as
2u 1 ur ur ( c011 c012 ) 2ur c044 2ur ( 3c011 c012 ) u
c011 2r +
+
+ 2
+
r r r 2
2
r z 2
2r 2
2r 2
r
( c011 + c012 ) 2u
2u z
u u
+ c044 r + z + 0 2ur = 0
r
r z
r
2r
z
( c011 c012 ) 2u + 1 u u + c011 2u + c044 2u + ( 3c011 c012 ) ur +
2
2
r r r 2 r 2 2
r 2 z 2
2r 2
r
( c011 + c012 ) 2ur + ( c013 + c044 ) 2uz + c u + 1 uz + 2u = 0
044
0
r
r
z
2r
z r
2ur 1 ur 1 2u
2u 1 u z 1 2u z
+ 2
+
+
+
+
c044 2z +
c
c
+
( 013 044 )
r r r 2
r
r z r z r z
+ ( c013 + c044 )
(4)
2u z
u z
u u 1 u
c033 2 + c013 r + r +
+ 0 2u z = 0
+ c033
z
r r
z
r
where it is assumed that the density also follows an exponential form
as z ( z ) = 0 e az . Note that the temporal displacement field components are expanded
using the Fourier series bases and coefficients corresponding to the harmonic with
angular frequency are [ur , u , u z ] ( r , , z ) = [ur , u , u z ] ( r , , z , t ) e it .
Using the potential two sets of potential functions F and introduced by
EskandariGhadi (2005) for elastic transversely isotropic homogeneous domains, one
can obtain the following representations in the Fourier displacement coefficients for
the functionally graded soil as
2 F
F 1
ur = 3
2
(5)
r z
r r
3 2 F 2 F
u =
+
(6)
r z
r r
2 0 2
u z = (1 + 1 ) r2 + 2 + +
F
(7)
z
z
c
c
(
)
011
012
2 ( c013 + c044 )
c011 + c012
2c044
, 2 =
and 3 =
. The governing
c011 c012
c011 c012
c011 c012
equations for the two scalar potential functions is obtained by implementing equations
(57) into (4) as
z
2 2 2 ( 3 2 ) 2
2z 2
2 2z
2
2
r + e
+ e
+
(8)
im 2 m +
e 1 F = 0
1 + 1
z 2
z 4
(9)
20 = 0
Where 1 =
ASCE
60
Where 2im are given in Yaghmaie et. al. (2013) and Yaghmaie et. al. (2016),
2c033
. s and s2 are the roots of the polynomial
4 =
( c011 c012 ) 1
(10)
s 4 + ( 2 2 (1 + ) ) s 2 + (1 + ) = 0
4
and =
1 + .
2
2
2c011s1
1 + 1 2
( c011 c012 ) 2c044 s2
2
(12)
0m m = 0
Where Fm and m are the Hankel transformed potential functions and is the
independent variable representing the Hankel transformed radial coordinate r. The
homogeneous solution to equations (1112) are
F1m ( , z ) = e
z
2
1m ( , z ) = e
z
2
(13)
F2 m ( , z ) = e
z
2
A2 m ( ) e 1z + B2 m ( ) e 2 z
2 m ( , z ) = E1m ( ) e
3 z
2
(14)
for region II
FIG. 1. The schematic of the considered problem in the functionally graded soil
ASCE
61
v ( r , , z = s ) = v ( r , , z = s + )
(16)
w ( r , , z = s ) = w ( r , , z = s + )
(17)
rz ( r , , z = s ) = rz ( r , , z = s + ) + P ( r , )
(18)
z ( r , , z = s ) = z ( r , , z = s + ) + Q ( r , )
(19)
zz ( r , , z = s ) = zz ( r , , z = s + ) + R ( r , )
(20)
zz ( r , , z = 0 ) = 0
(21)
rz ( r , , z = 0 ) = 0
(22)
(23)
z ( r , , z = 0 ) = 0
The above boundary value problem for Fourier coefficients of displacement fields
are solved for various harmonic excitations. The singular kernel integrals in terms of
the scalar potentials in the Hankel transformed domain requires calculation of residues
of the kernel function in the singular points and inverse Hankel transformation over
the nonsingular paths (for details see Yaghmaie et. al (2013) and Yaghmaie et. al
(2016)). The gauss quadrature technique is utilized for integrations of the kernel
function. The next presents the description of the results and comparisons with
existing solutions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
For the homogeneous transversely isotropic domain the displacement and stress
P ( r , ) = P0 ( r , )
and
fields
regarding
a
vertical
excitation
(i.e.
results of this manuscript are compared with the existing solution (by
assigning = 0 in the formulations) in Fig. 2. The results of the functionally graded
halfspace match the homogeneous case. Then the elastodynamic boundary value
problem in (1323) is solved for various s and values and three transversely
isotropic materials whose properties are given in Table.1.
Table 1. Properties of the Transversely Isotropic Materials
ASCE
Material
E ( MPa )
E ' ( MPa )
G ( MPa )
G ' ( MPa )
'
I
II
III
50000
100000
150000
150000
50000
50000
20000
40000
60000
20000
20000
20000
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
62
z/s
FIG. 2. Validation of the homogeneous soil for radial displacement field along
the dimensionless depth z normalized with s coordinate with existing solution
The vertical and radial displacements along z/s for the three materials given in
Table.1 are plotted in Fig. 3 (a) and (b) respectively. The dimensionless angular
frequency is chosen as 0 =
z/s
z/s
(a)
(b)
FIG. 3. The dimensionless (a) radial and (b) vertical displacement fields along z/s
for 0 = 3 and = 0.5
ASCE
63
The real and imaginary parts of the radial dimensionless displacement component
for the same dynamic loading and inhomogeneity parameter along r/s are illustrated in
Fig. 4 (a) and (b) respectively. As expected the results are oscillatory due to the
harmonic mode being imposed however the real and imaginary parts of Fourier
coefficients decay rapidly to zero along the radial coordinate.
r/s
r/s
(a)
(b)
FIG. 4. The dimensionless (a) real and (b) imaginary parts of radial
displacement fields along r/s for 0 = 3 and = 0.5
The real and imaginary parts of the stress component zz for the same dynamic
loading and inhomogeneity parameter along z/s are illustrated in Fig. 5 (a) and (b)
respectively. The real part of the stress field is singular near z=s and oscillatory. Both
of the real and imaginary components of stress field amplify for Material I however
for the other two materials they exhibit a decaying trajectory.
z/s
z/s
(a)
(b)
FIG. 5. The dimensionless (a) real and (b) imaginary parts of stress field zz along
z/s for 0 = 3 and = 0.5
CONCLUSIONS
ASCE
Apsel, R.J., Luco, J.E., (1983). "On the Greens functions for a layered half space. part
II". Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73 (4), 931951.
Eskandari, M., Shodja, H.M., (2010). "Greens functions of an exponentially graded
transversely isotropic halfspace". Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 15371545.
EskandariGhadi, M., (2005). A complete solutions of the wave equations for
transversely isotropic media. J. Elast. 81, 119.
EskandariGhadi, M., ArdeshirBehrestaghi, A., (2010). "Forced vertical vibration of
rigid circular disc buried in an arbitrary depth of a transversely isotropic halfspace". Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (7), 547560.
Fatahi, B., Tabatabaiefar S., (2014). "Effects of soil plasticity on seismic performance
of midrise building frames resting on soft soils". Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (10), 1387
1402.
Fatahi, B., Tabatabaiefar S., (2014). "Fully Nonlinear versus Equivalent Linear
Computation Method for Seismic Analysis of Midrise Buildings on Soft Soils". Int.
J. Geomech. 14 (4), 115.
Kashtalyan, M., Rushchitsky, J.J., (2009). "Revisiting displacement functions in threedimensional elasticity of inhomogeneous media". Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 3463
3470.
Khojasteh, A., Rahimian, M., Eskandari, M., Pak, R.Y.S., (2008). "Asymmetric wave
propagation in a transversely isotropic halfspace in displacement potentials". Int. J.
Eng. Sci. 46, 690710
Wang, C.D., Pan, E., Tzeng, C.S., Han, F., Liao, J.J., (2006). "Displacements and
stresses due to a uniform vertical circular load in an inhomogeneous crossanisotropic halfspace". Int. J. Geomech. 6 (1), 110.
Yaghmaie, R. and Guo, S. and Ghosh, S. (2013). "Simulating coupled transient
electromagneticlarge deformation dynamical mechanical systems using a novel
multitime scaling method." Engineering Mechanics Institute Conference,
doi:
Northwestern
Univerity,
Evanston,
IL.
August
47,
2013.
10.13140/RG.2.1.4744.3041
Yaghmaie, R. and Guo, S. and Ghosh, S. (2016). "Wavelet transformation induced
multitime scaling (WATMUS) model for coupled transient electromagnetic and
structural dynamics finite element analysis." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
(in Press) doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.01.016
Yaghmaie, R. and Noorzad, A. (2010). "3D dynamic soilfoundations interactions in a
transversely isotropic mediumimpedance characteristics." Engineering Mechanics
Institute Conference, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA., August
811, 2010. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1988.0803
ASCE
64
65
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins Univ., 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore,
MD 21218. Email: ryaghma2@jhu.edu
2
Ph.D., Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flager
St., Miami, FL 33174.
ASCE
66
analyses For details see Rahman (2000), Brzoza and Pauk (2008) and Rahimian et al.
(2006). The elastodynamic ReisnnerSagoci problem for an inhomogeneous ground
has not been studied and forms as the primary motivation of this study. The effect of
inertia plays an important role as the wave propagation might amplify the stress when
the stress wave transmits thought the ground. The inhomogeneity of the ground is
parameterized into a generic powerlaw form that allows one to alter the gradation in
the modulus and density of the medium. In section formulation and solution of the
problem, we detail the derivation of the governing elastodynamic scalar wave equation
for the circumferential displacement field associated with the rotation of a rigid
circular disk about its axis of symmetry under the action of a torque T. The considered
problem is axisymmetric and its formulation in the cylindrical coordinate (r,,z) is
independent of variable . The scalar waveequation is solved using the Hankeltransform in the radial direction and the timedependence is reduced using the Laplace
transform. The resultant ordinary differential equation for the displacement is solved
in the depth (z) direction as a modifiedBesselequation. The inversetransforms to
the radial and timedomains result in dualintegral equations in terms of
circumferential displacement and stress fields that lead to a set of Fredholms integral
equations of the second kind which are further numerically solved. In section
numerical results and discussions, we have presented the validation of our solutions
methodology with the original elastostatic and elastodynamic homogeneous ReissnerSagoci problem. Results comparing the effect of inhomogeneity and inertia on the
stresswave propagation in the inhomogeneous ground are also investigated in this
section.
FORMULATION AND SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM
Consider a cylindrical coordinate system (r,,z) such that the functionally graded
material (FGM) halfspace occupies the region 0r<, 0z< and 02. Assume
that a circular rigid punch of radius a is bonded to the boundary plane z=0 and is
rotated by the torque T. Let (z) and (z) denote the shear modulus and density of the
FGM halfspace defined as
(1)
( z ) = 0 (1 + z )
( z ) = 0 (1 + z )
(2)
where 0 and 0 are the shear modulus, density at z=0 and and are real
positive constants. Let the axis z be the symmetry axis of the punch. The scheme of
the considered problem is shown in Fig.1.
The investigated problem is axisymmetric, independent on the variable .
Let v ( r , z , t ) , z ( r , z , t ) and r ( r , z , t ) be the displacement and stresses in the FGM
halfspace. The constitutive relations are expressed as
(3)
v ( r , z , t )
z ( r , z, t ) = ( z )
z
(4)
v ( r , z , t ) v ( r , z , t )
r ( r , z, t ) = ( z )
r
r
ASCE
67
To solve the formulated above problem the Hankel transforms of the first order and
Laplace transform will be applied described as
(9)
v ( s, z , t ) = rv ( r , z , t ) J1 ( sr ) dr
0
( s, z , p ) = rv ( s, z, t ) e pt dt
(10)
+
s
z 2 1 + z z cs2
ASCE
68
(12)
2 p 2
s2
0
+
2 2 cs2 2
The homogenous solution to equation (12) can be obtained by assuming the form
(13)
= y
1
and y is an unknown function. Applying equation (13) to (12)
where =
2
yields the modified Bessels equation as
(14)
2 y 1 y 2
p2
s2
+
+
+
y
=
0
2 2 2 cs2 2
By applying the regularity conditions in (8) the homogeneous solution to equation (14)
can be written in the form
(15)
( s, z, p ) = s 1 A ( s ) K ( s p )
where s p =
1+
p2
and K is the modified Bessels function of second kind and
s 2 cs2
( r , z, p ) = A ( s )(1 + z ) K ( (1 + z ) s p )J1 ( sr ) ds
(16)
r
0 ( s ) (1 + h ( s ) )J1 ( sr ) ds = p for 0 r < a
(18)
where ( s ) =
(17)
K ( s p )
s ( p)
s
A( s)
1 . Let function
A ( s ) K 1 ( s p ) and h ( s ) =
s ( p)
s
K 1 ( s p )
( s ) = g ( q ) sin ( sq )dq
(19)
ASCE
69
Note that the above integral is evolving with the timetransformed variable p and is
required to be obtained in every p increment. Similarly the right hand side vector in
equation (20) is updated at every p step. Once the solution to function g ( r ) in
equation (20) is obtained, the unknown coefficient A ( s ) can be calculated.
Surface Contact Stress Distribution
The stress distribution under the rigid punch is of great interest in fracture mechanics
where shear cracks may initiate from near the edges of the punch. The stress
distribution under the punch may be obtained using equations (3), (19), and (20):
a
(21)
0
z ( r , 0, p ) =
J
sr
g
q
sin
sq
dqds
(
)
(
)
(
)
0
0
2 r 0
Equation (21) can be written as
(22)
g (q)
a
z ( r , 0, p ) = 0 J 0 ( sr )
dq
2 r r
q2 r 2
Applying the integration by parts in equation (22) yields
a
0 g ( a )
r
a g ( q ) dq
+
z ( r , 0, p ) =
2a a 2 r 2 g ( a ) r r q q q 2 r 2
The applied torque T due to the rigid rotation of the punch then follows
a 2
a
r 0 g ( a )
r
a g ( q ) dq
T ( p ) = 2
+
dr
2a
a 2 r 2 g ( a ) r r q q q 2 r 2
0
(23)
(24)
ASCE
FIG. 2. The comparison of elastostatic results obtained from the proposed model
with existing results for displacement component v with radial coordinate r.
Parametric Study for FGM HalfSpace
Consider now the shear modulus and density of the nonhomogeneous halfspace
given in equations (1) and (2) evolve in a quadratic form, i.e. = 2 . Using equation
(13) it follows that = 0.5 .
(a)
(b)
FIG. 3. The contours of displacement field at t = 0.1s for (a) homogenous halfspace
elastodynamic problem (b) FGM halfspace with = 5 elastodynamic problem.
The elastodynamic problem is solved for various values. The spatial contours of
displacement response for the elastodynamic homogenous halfspace ( = 10 E 6 )
problem and elastodynamic inhomogeneous case with = 5 corresponding to the time
ASCE
70
71
point t = 0.1s are illustrated in Figs. 3(a) and (b), respectively. Accordingly shear
stress fields z corresponding to the elastodynamic homogenous and inhomogeneous
problem at time t = 0.1s are illustrated in Figs. 4(a) and (b), respectively. It is clear
that the FGM soil with the assumed exponent coefficients leads to a higher shear stress
and correspondingly a lower state of displacement in the halfspace.
(a)
(b)
FIG. 4. Shear stress z contours at t = 0.1s for (a) homogenous halfspace
( = 10 E 6 ) elastodynamic problem (b) FGM halfspace with = 5 elastodynamic
problem.
CONCLUSIONS
Ai, Z.Y. and Liu, C.L. (2014). "Axisymmetric vibration of an elastic circular plate
bonded on a transversely isotropic multilayered halfspace." Soil Dyn. Earthquake
Eng., Vol. 67: 257263.
Brzoza, A. and Pauk, V. (2008). "Torsion of rough elastic halfspace by rigid punch."
Arch. Appl. Mech., Vol. 78(7): 531542.
EskandariGhadi, M., Nabizedeh, S.M. and ArdeshirBehresteghi, A. (2014). "Vertical
and horizontal vibrations of a rigid disc on a multilayered transversely isotropic
halfspace." Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 6162: 135139.
ASCE
Lin, G., Han, Z and Li, J. (2013). "An efficient approach for dynamic impedance of
surface footing on layered halfspace." Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 49: 3951.
Rahimian, M., GhorbaniTanha, A.K. and EskandariGhadi, M. (2006). "The
ReissnerSagoci problem for a transversely isotropic halfspace." Int. J. Numer.
Anal. Methods Geomech., Vol. 30(11): 10631074.
Rahman, M. (2000). "The ReissnerSagoci problem for a halfspace under buried
torsional forces." Int. J. Solids Struc., Vol. 37(8): 11191132.
Reissner, E. and Sagoci, H.F. (1944). "Forced torsional oscillations of an elastic halfspace I." J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 15: 652654.
Sagoci, H.F. (1944). "Forced torsional oscillations of an elastic halfspace II." J. Appl.
Phys., Vol. 15: 655662.
Yaghmaie, R. and Guo, S. and Ghosh, S. (2013). "Simulating coupled transient
electromagneticlarge deformation dynamical mechanical systems using a novel
multitime scaling method." Engineering Mechanics Institute Conference,
August
47,
2013. doi:
Northwestern
Univerity,
Evanston,
IL.
10.13140/RG.2.1.4744.3041
Yaghmaie, R. and Guo, S. and Ghosh, S. (2016). "Wavelet transformation induced
multitime scaling (WATMUS) model for coupled transient electromagnetic and
structural dynamics finite element analysis." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
(in Press) doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.01.016
Yaghmaie, R. and Noorzad, A. (2010). "3D dynamic soilfoundations interactions in a
transversely isotropic mediumimpedance characteristics." Engineering Mechanics
Institute Conference, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA., August
811, 2010. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1988.0803
ASCE
72
73
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016,
India. Email: mainakm@iitk.ac.in
2
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016,
India. Email: priyog@iitk.ac.in
ASCE
74
material very lightweight (1% of the weight of traditional earth materials) with low
acoustic impedance and hence, is suitable for effective vibration barrier. It has been
reported that geofoam can play an effective role in screening the vibrations (Wang et al.
2006; Alzawi and El Naggar 2009), but not much attention is given on the optimization
of the usage of geofoam to achieve better screening efficiency. In the present study,
giving emphasis on this optimization issue a new screening technique, intermittent
geofoam (IF) infilled trench is proposed considering a strip foundation resting on nonhomogeneous layered soil deposit under dynamic loading analyzing with twodimensional plane strain finite element analysis. The active vibration screening
efficiency of IF is estimated and compared with that of continuous geofoam (CF) infilled trench and open trench (OT).
PROBLEM DEFINITION
In the present analysis, a rigid embedded strip foundation subjected to a vertical
dynamic load intensity of p(t) = p0sin(t) is considered. The foundation is placed on
dry, linear elastic nonhomogeneous layered soil deposit with an embedment factor
(Df/B) of 1.0. One side trench of depth, d and width, w is placed at a centertocenter
distance of l from the foundation as shown in Fig. 1. Considering a highspeed machine
a constant force amplitude of sinusoidal dynamic load, P0 of 1 kN with an operating
frequency, F of 10 Hz for a duration, t of 10 seconds is applied on the foundation. In
addition to that, a static load intensity of 10 kN/m2 is considered as the selfweight of the
machine and other accessories, which is found to be well below the ultimate failure load
of the foundation under static condition. The objective is to determine the active
vibration screening efficiency of IF in terms of amplitude reduction factor (Arf) by
measuring the reduction in the displacement amplitude at different pickup points caused
by the sinusoidal dynamic excitation on the foundation. The Arf can be expressed as
(Woods 1968)
Arf =
(UV ) After
(UV ) Before
(1)
Where, (UV)After and (UV)Before are the vertical displacement at different pickup points
after and before the installation of the trench, respectively. The Arf value is calculated
considering the peak vertical displacement amplitude of the dynamic response.
MATERIALS AND METHOD OF ANALSYS
Material properties
As per Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam (ASTM
D6817), the available density of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam varies from 11.2
kg/m3 (EPS12) to 45.7 kg/m3 (EPS46). In the present study, EPS 12, having the lowest
ASCE
available density, is considered as infilled material. It has elastic modulus and Poissons
ration of 3.3 MPa and 0.1, respectively. The acoustic impedance of EPS 12 is
determined as ZG = 7.72 kNs/m3. The soil deposit considered in the present study is
same as that considered by Ghosh and Kumari (2012), where the subsoil strata is
extended up to a depth of 11.7 m followed by the bedrock. The dynamic properties of
the layered deposit are obtained and listed in Table 1. The water table is assumed to be
at great depth and hence, it is assumed to have no significant impact on the dynamic
response analysis. The embedded concrete foundation has the bulk and the shear
modulus of 1.39 107 kN/m2 and 1.04 107 kN/m2, respectively.
ASCE
75
76
Layer1
2.06103
Layer2
8.02103
Layer3
1.12104
Layer4
4.52104
4.20104
7.21104
8.68104
1.80105
1.61104
2.77104
3.33104
6.95104
96.72
123.00
131.29
184.71
180.87
230.01
245.51
345.41
89.47
114.02
121.71
171.23
8.94
11.40
12.17
17.12
307.48
414.02
466.47
690.82
ASCE
to the soil body as described by Lysmer and Kuhlmeyer (1969). The vertical
displacements at different pickup points along the ground surface are captured during
the dynamic analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of depth of trench
The effect of depth of trench has been studied by varying d/R from 0.6 to 1.0, keeping
other parameter constant (l/R = 0.4, w/R = 0.06 and F = 10 Hz). From Fig. 2 it is clear
that the screening efficiency of IF is higher than CF, whereas the screening efficiency
closer to OT can be achieved by reducing the volume of geofoam or increasing the
height of pockets in the intermittent geofoam. The value of Arf is reported for x/R = 1.85
as because of a local maximum does exist at this pickup point (Woods 1968).
ASCE
77
ASCE
78
AlHunaidi, M.O. and Rainer, J.H. (1991). Remedial measures for traffic induced
vibrations at a residential site Part1: field test. Canadian Acoustics/Acoustique
Canadiennne, Vol. 19(1): 313.
Alzawi, A. and El Naggar, M.H. (2009). Vibration scattering using geofoam material as
vibration wave barriers. Proceedings of 62nd Canadian Geotechnical Conference,
NB, Canada, September 2014.p. 9971104.
ASCE
79
ASCE
80
81
Senior Researcher, Civil Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region, Sapporo 0608602, Japan. Email: kotomsw@ceri.go.jp
2
Associate Professor, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo 0608628, Japan. Email: kisobe@eng.hokudai.ac.jp
Abstract: Foundations in soft ground which support structures hold the potential for
excessive deformation caused by a largescale earthquake. Such foundations need to
be designed in order to meet sufficient seismic resistance and avoid excessive
deformation against a largescale earthquake. One method to achieve this objective is
the use of batter pile foundations, which have slanted piles to improve the maximum
bearing capacity and permit the reduction of construction costs as compared to those
for vertical pile foundations. Batter pile foundations has been regarded as a rational
foundation in terms of lateral resistance and recently tended to be reapplied in Japan in
particular, because various piling methods (such as rotary penetration pile application)
have been developed. However, seismic behavior of batter pile foundations in peaty
soft ground has not yet been clarified. In this study, dynamic centrifugal model tests
were conducted for various pile specifications to elucidate the seismic behavior of
batter pile foundations in peaty soft ground.
INTRODUCTION
A number of studies have examined the mechanism of battered pile foundations in
light of their potential to provide higher horizontal resistance and maximum bearing
capacity than vertical pile foundations. In previous studies conducted by Satoh et al.
(Satoh et al. 1969a and 1969b), the mechanical behavior and usefulness of battered
pile foundations were verified through theoretical analysis. Design methods based on
these studies (e.g., Japan Road Association 2007) are currently applied. However, as
the seismic behavior of battered pile foundations in soft ground under Level 1 and
Level 2 earthquake motions has not been fully verified, centrifuge model tests were
conducted to confirm the suitability of such foundations for soft peat ground where
consolidation settlement may occur. In the tests, seismic performance in soft ground
for both Level 1 and Level 2 earthquake motions was examined.
ASCE
82
Vertical pile
A Accelerometer
P Strain gauge
d : Laser transducer
Mass 800g
d1
A15
A16
A14
A13
A12
P6
P5
P4
d2
A8
A7
A6
A11
P3
A5
A10
P2
A4
A9
P1
A3
A2
Peat ground
Base ground
A1
45
700
790
45
Instrumented pile
ASCE
83
of 150 gal and 750 gal were set for Level 1 and Level 2 earthquake motions,
respectively (Japan Road Association 2002a, Japan Society of Civil Engineers 2002).
Table 1. Soil physical properties
Value
Water content w (%)
300
3
2.01
Void ratio e
6.45
4.6104
Compression index Cc
2.08
2
7300
2
0.0015
Pile type
Pile spacing
Case 1
Vertical
3D
Case 2
Battered
3D
12 degrees
Case 3
Battered
4.5D
12 degrees
Case 4
Battered
6D
12 degrees
Case 5
Battered
3D
9 degrees
Case 6
Battered
3D
15 degrees
ASCE
84
Acceleration (gal)
Acceleration (gal)
1000
800
600
400
200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
10
20
Time (sec)
(a) Level 1
30
40
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
(b) Level 2
85
A similar trend was observed for both cases under Level 1 and Level 2 earthquake
motions. Battered pile foundation with larger pile inclination angle generates potential
restraining ability to the earthquake induced horizontal displacement.
There was no difference in the horizontal resistance of battered pile foundation
before and after dynamic excitation under Level 1 and Level 2 earthquake motions,
and there was also no damage to the piles. It can therefore be judged that battered pile
foundations provide required earthquake resistance of the pile structure as specified in
the design standard (Japan Road Association 2002b).
12
Horizontal displacement of pile
head (cm)
3
Case 1
2
1
0
1
2
3
0
10
20
Time (sec)
30
8
12
0
0
4
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
12
Case 5
2
1
0
1
2
3
0
10
20
Time (sec)
30
Case 5
8
4
0
4
8
12
0
40
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
12
40
Case 2
2
1
0
1
2
3
0
10
20
Time (sec)
30
Case 2
8
4
0
4
8
12
0
40
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
12
Horizontal displacement of pile
head (cm)
Case 1
Case 6
2
1
0
1
2
3
0
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
Case 6
8
4
0
4
8
12
0
10
20
Time (sec)
30
40
FIG. 3. Horizontal displacement response of pile head under Level 1 and Level 2
earthquake motions (in prototype scale).
ASCE
86
500
500
Case 1
400
400
Case 2
Before excitation
300
200
100
300
200
100
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
10
(a) Case 1
25
30
500
Case 4
Case 3
400
Horizontal Load H (kN)
400
Horizontal Load H (kN)
20
(b) Case 2
500
300
200
100
300
200
100
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
(c) Case 3
(d) Case 4
500
500
Case 5
Case 6
400
400
15
300
200
100
300
200
100
10
15
20
25
(e) Case 5
30
10
15
20
25
30
(f) Case 6
FIG. 4. Static horizontal loading curves of pile before and after Level 1 and Level
2 dynamic excitations (in prototype scale).
ASCE
CONCLUSIONS
The results of centrifuge model tests performed to clarify the mechanism of battered
pile foundations in soft ground confirmed the following findings in regard to dynamic
behavior:
1) In the centrifuge excitation tests, the battered pile foundation in soft ground showed
a trend of reducing pile head horizontal displacement response under both Level 1
and Level 2 earthquake motions in comparison to the vertical pile foundation. The
trend was similar to that confirmed for static horizontal resistance. Seismic
performance was therefore considered generally to be better in the battered pile
foundation. It was also found that a larger inclination angle of the battered pile
resulted in a greater pile displacement restraining ability.
2) Based on the results of the static horizontal loading tests on coupled piles
conducted after the dynamic excitation tests under Level 1 and Level 2 earthquake
motions, it is considered that battered pile foundation provide the required seismic
structural resistance, as the horizontal resistance of the foundation in soft ground
was generally the same as that confirmed in the horizontal loading tests performed
before dynamic excitation was applied.
REFERENCES
Japan Road Association. (2002a). "Specifications for highway bridges, part V: seismic
design": 210228.
Japan Road Association. (2002b). "Specification for highway bridges, part IV:
substructures": 243265.
Japan Road Association. (2007). "Pile foundation design handbook, 2006 Edition":
414429.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers. (2002). "Standard specifications for concrete seismic performance verification": 107112.
Satoh A., Akai K. and Funasaki T. (1969a). "Study on calculation method for
negative skin friction and bending of batter piles part 1: calculation method."
Report of the Japan Highway Public Corporation Laboratory: 7682.
Satoh A., Akai K. and Funasaki T. (1969b). "Negative skin friction and bending
moment of batter piles strain measurement of steel pipe piles in the Fukuroi
District", Proceedings of the Japan Highway Public Corporation Laboratory
Conference: 357379.
ASCE
87
88
Abstract: Enzymatic emulsions contain enzymes (protein molecules) that react with
soil molecules to form a cementing bond that stabilizes the soil structure and reduces
the soils affinity for water (Velasquez et al., 2005). The present study presents an
investigation to evaluate the enzyme treated soil under cyclic loading. The study
presents the variation in shear modulus on a selected dosage of enzyme with 28 days
of curing period. Strain controlled cyclic triaxial tests were performed with different
confining pressure, loading frequency and cyclic shear stain amplitude. It is found that
the shear modulus values decreases with number of cycles and increases with increase
in confining pressure. The shear modulus decreases with the increase in loading
frequency and with the increase in cyclic shear strain. Rate of degradation in shear
modulus due to increment in cyclic shear strain is found to be more with higher
confining pressure. It may be because the enzyme treated soil behaves stiffer under
=0.15% due to the lateral support. At higher cyclic shear strain lateral support may
not be able to make it stiff.
INTRODUCTION
In this study, performance of enzyme treated soil is evaluated under cyclic loading
by varying loading rate, loading frequency and confining pressure. From the literature,
the behaviour of the enzyme treated soil generally depends upon the type of the soil,
its mineralogical composition, type of enzyme, dosage of enzyme and curing period
(Tingle et al., 2007, Velasquez, 2005; Khan and Taha, 2015; Rauch et al., 2003).
Though dynamic properties of soils are required in advanced numerical analyses of
geotechnical engineering problems, determination of dynamic properties of enzyme
treated soil is found to be very limited. Skilled procedure and high costs in conducting
tests under cyclic loading can be the possible reasons.
The shear modulus degradation of cement treated clay during cyclic loading is
investigated from a series of cyclic triaxial tests. The parameters considered for the
study are cement content (2.57.5%), curing days (728), cyclic shear strain amplitude
(0.31%), number of loading cycles (1100) and loading frequency (0.10.5 Hz).
They found that the shear modulus degradation decreases with increase in the shear
ASCE
strain amplitude, cement content and curing days. It is also noted that irrespective of
the mix ratio and curing conditions, the degradation decreases with increase in loading
frequency (Subramaniam and Banerjee, 2014). Nonlinear dynamic analyses under the
influence of different earthquake records are conducted using FLAC 2D software, and
the results in terms of the maximum lateral displacements and base shears for both
elastic and inelastic behaviours of the rise momentresisting building frames (for
fixed and flexible boundary conditions) are obtained. A comprehensive empirical
relationship is also proposed for determining the lateral displacements of the midrise
momentresisting building frames under earthquake and the influence of soilstructure
interaction. (Tabatabaiefar et al., 2014)
Based on the cyclic tests done on fully saturated sands conducted in undrained
conditions and cyclic tests conducted in the constant volume equivalentundrained
conditions in the cyclic strain controlled mode, with the constant cyclic shear strain
amplitude, it is concluded that the variation of the secant shear modulus and associated
stiffness index with the number of cycles N is distinctly different at different levels of
shear strain amplitude (Vucetic and Mortezaie, 2015). Resonant column tests were
performed to study influences of void ratio, overconsolidation ratio, plasticity,
confining stress, and degree of weathering. Insitu test results showed effects of
increased confining stress with depth, and OCR, mass density, and void ratio were
estimated using correlations to assess current insitu state. Insitu measurements of
lowamplitude shear moduli from seismic piezocones, seismic flat dilatometers,
spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW), and crosshole tests were found to be in
good agreement with laboratory values using the resonant column (Schneider, 1999).
A novel and enhanced soilstructure model is analysed in the direct method using
stateoftheart capabilities of FLAC 2D simulating the complex dynamic soil
structure interaction for three types of soil with shear wave velocity 600m/s (Ce),
320m/s (De) and 150 m/s (Ee). The effects of dynamic soilstructure interaction for
seismic design of midrise moment resisting building frames resting on soil class Ce is
found to be insignificant while significant effects has been observed on soil class De
and Ee. (Tabatabaiefar and Fatahi, 2014)
MATERIAL USED
Soil Preparation
The soil used in this study is from Tilda, Chhattisgarh state, India. Collected soil
sample (D0) was oven dried and crushed with wooden mallet and sieved from 75 IS
sieve. Properties of the soil are tabulated in Table 1. Terrazyme is a natural, nontoxic
liquid, formulated using vegetable extracts. It is a surfactant (an ionic surface active
agent) which changes the hydrophilic nature of clay and lime materials to
hydrophobic. Its application not only assists in the expulsion of water from soils, but
also aids the lubrication of soil particles and increases the compatibility of many soils.
The reaction of Terrazyme on soil is particularly effective because of the ionexchange
capacity of clay minerals. TerraZyme changes the plastic characteristics of the soil due
to a reduction in its water absorbing capacity (RaviShankar et al, 2009).
ASCE
89
90
Valuee
42.255
18.6
23.655
14.5
13.2
To
o study the variation
v
in shear
s
modullus, optimum
m dosage of T
Terrazyme w
was selectedd
by conducting UCS tests on
o different dosages as shown in ttable 2. Terrrazyme wass
mix
xed with oveen dried soil in differentt proportionss i.e. D1 (2000ml/ 1.5m3 of soil), D22
(200
0ml/ 2m3 off soil). Uncon
nfined comp
pressive strenngth gain forr D2 samplees at 28 dayss
of curing
c
is foun
nd to be morre compared
d to D1.
EXP
PERIMENT
TAL STUD
DY
Cycclic Triaxiall Tests
A series of cyclic
c
undraiined triaxiall tests were conducted on enzyme treated soill
(D2
2) specimens, by using
g a cyclic trriaxial testinng apparatuus. The equiipment unitt
con
nsists of a triiaxial cell, a load frame,, the controll and data accquisition haardware andd
the control softw
ware as show
wn in fig.1 (a) with electtromechaniical actuator. Air is usedd
m
Straain controllled cyclic teests were perrformed undder differentt
as a chamber medium.
con
nfining pressu
ure, loading frequency and
a shear strrain amplitudde. The Enzzyme treatedd
soil specimen (3
38 X 76 cm)) of D2 dosaage with 28 ddays of curinng period is subjected too
the laboratory cyclic
c
triaxiaal tests as giv
ven in Tablee 3. The typpical stress sttrain loop iss
show
wn in Fig. 1 (b)
g system, (b
b) A typical stress strain
n loop
FIG 1 (a)) Cyclic triaxial testing
ASCE
91
UCS (kP
Pa)
213
768
1073
c
strain approach, it is required to
t input the singleampllitude axial sstrain in mm
m
In cyclic
whiich can be calculated
c
from
f
the cycclic shear s trains. Cycllic loading iis generallyy
expressed in teerms of cycclic shear sttrains. For a constant ccyclic deforrmation, thee
requ
uired axial strain
s
is callculated as per
p ASTM D3999/D3999M11 andd the singlee
amp
plitude deforrmation is fo
ound out by using
u
the exp
xpression givven in equatiion 1.
LSAA = SA X LS
(1)
Wh
here: LSA = single ampliitude deform
mation, mm, SA = singlee amplitude axial strain
(dimensionle
(
ess) and Ls = length of test specimeen (mm).
Sheear Moduluss Degradatiion
Thee cyclic stresssstrain beh
haviour of treated soil (D
D2) is analyzzed to deterrmine secantt
sheaar modulus (G). The secant shear modulus
m
is eestimated foor each cyclee of loadingg
from
m the hysterresis loops ob
btained in sttrain controllled cyclic looading as shhown in Fig.
2 (Z
Zhang et. al, 2005).
FIG
G 2 Hystereesis loop forr one cycle of
o loading sh
howing G (Z
Zhang et. all, 2005)
ASCE
Effe
fect of Confin
ning Pressu
ure
Thee shear mod
dulus values decreases with numbber of cyclles and increases withh
incrrease in confining pressure as show
wn in Figs.3 to 5. In this tests D2 ssample weree
takeen after 28 days curing
g and the sample was subjected to cyclic loaading underr
variious cyclic loading.
l
From
m the resultts the shear modulus off the specimeen increasess
with
h the increasse in confinin
ng pressure.
FIG
G 3 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 50kPa, 1100kPa,
150
0kPa; = 0.1
15% and f= 0.5 Hz)
FIG
G 4 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 50kPa, 1100kPa,
150
0kPa; = 0.1
15% and f= 1 Hz)
G 5 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 50kPa, 1100kPa,
FIG
150
0kPa; = 0.1
15% and f= 1.5 Hz)
ASCE
92
Effe
fect of Loadiing Frequen
ncy
Figss 6 to 8 sho
ow the sheaar modulus variations
v
w
with numberr of cycles ffor differentt
load
ding frequen
ncy. D2 speccimen with 28 days curring period w
was consideered for thiss
test and it wass subjected to cyclic shear
s
strain amplitude of 0.15% aand loadingg
quency 0.5 Hz,
H 1 Hz and
d 1.5 Hz. Fig
gs shows thaat the shear m
modulus deccreases withh
freq
the increase in loading
l
freq
quency. The rate of degrradation is foound to be less with thee
incrrease in conffining pressu
ure.
G 6 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 50kPa, = 0.15%
FIG
and
d f= 0.5 Hz, 1Hz, 1.5 Hzz)
G 7 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 100kPa, = 0.15%
FIG
and
d f= 0.5 Hz, 1Hz, 1.5 Hzz)
FIG
G 8 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles (P
P= 150kPa, = 0.15%
and
d f= 0.5 Hz, 1Hz, 1.5 Hzz)
ASCE
93
Effe
fect of Loadiing Rate
Fig.. 9 shows th
he shear mo
odulus variattions with nno of cycles for differennt values off
sheaar strain. In this test specimen
s
were subjecteed to cyclic shear strainn amplitudee
(0.1
15% and 0.3%
%) and load
ding frequenccy 1.0 Hz. Itt can be inferrred from thhe graph thatt
the shear mod
dulus decreaases with the
t
increasee in cyclic shear straiin. Rate off
degradation in shear modu
ulus due to increment
i
inn cyclic sheaar strain is found to bee
morre with high
her confinin
ng pressure.. It may bee because thhe enzyme treated soill
beh
haves stiffer under =0.15% due to the
t lateral suupport. At hiigher cyclic shear strainn
lateral support may
m not be able to mak
ke the soil sttiff. With thee increase inn number off
cyclles the degraadation rate decreases.
FIG
G 9 Variatio
on in Shear modulus with
w numberr of cycles ( = 0.15% aand 0.3%
and
d f= 1Hz.)
CO
ONCLUSION
NS
Bassed on the sttudy, followiing conclusiions are draw
wn:
1) The shear modulus values decreeases with nnumber of cyycles and inccreases withh
increasee in confining
g pressure.
2) The shear modulus decreases with
w the increease in loadding frequenccy. The ratee
of degraadation is fou
und to be lesss with the inncrease in coonfining pressure.
3) Rate of degradation in shear mo
odulus due too increment in cyclic shhear strain iss
found to
o be more with higherr confining pressure. IIt may be bbecause thee
enzyme treated soil behaves stiiffer under =0.15% duee to the lateeral support.
At higheer cyclic sheear strain lateeral support may not be able to makee it stiff.
ACKNOWLED
DGMENTS
S
Thee authors app
preciate the support
s
of Avijeet
A
agenccies for provviding the Teerrazyme.
REF
FERENCES
AST
TM D3999/D
D3999M11 (2011). Sttandard Testt Methods fo
for the Deterrmination off
the
t
Modulu
us and Dam
mping Prop
perties of Soils Usingg the Cycllic Triaxiall
Apparatus.
A
Annual Book
B
of AST
TM Standarrds, ASTM
M Internatioonal, Westt
Conshohock
C
ken, PA.
Khaan, T. A. an
nd Taha, M. R.,(2015). Effect of T
Three Bioennzymes on C
Compaction,,
Limits, and
Consistency
C
d Strength Characteristiccs of a Sedim
mentary Ressidual Soil,,
Advances
A
in Material Sccience and Engineering,
E
19.
ASCE
94
Rauch, A.F., Katz, L. E., and Liljestrand, H. M., (2003). An Analysis of the
Mechanisms and Efficacy of Three Liquid Chemical Soil Stabilizers, Research
Report 19931. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin.
RaviShankar, A.U., H. K. Rai, and R. Mithanthaya, (2009). Bioenzyme stabilized
lateritic soil as a highway material, Indian Roads Congress Journal, Vol.70 (2):
144151.
Schneider, J.A., Hoyos, L., Jr., Mayne, P.W., Macari, E.J., and Rix, G.J. (1999).
Field and laboratory measurements of dynamic shear modulus of Piedmont
residual soils, Behavioral Characteristics of Residual Soils, GSP 92, ASCE,
Reston, VA, pp. 1225.
Subramaniam, P. and Banerjee, S., (2014). Factors affecting shear modulus
degradation of cement treated clay, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,
Vol. 65: 181188.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R., and Fatahi, B., (2014). Idealisation of soilstructure system to
determine inelastic seismic response of midrise building frames, Soil Dynamics
and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 66: 339351.
Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B., (2014). An empirical relationship
to determine lateral seismic response of midrise building frames under influence of
soilstructure interaction, The structural design of tall and special buildings, Vol.
23 (7): 526548
Tingle, J.S., Newman, J.K., Larson, S.L., Weiss, C.A., and Rushing, J.F., (2007).
Stabilization Mechanisms of Nontraditional Additives, Journal of the
Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record, No. 1989, Vol.
2: 5967.
Velasquez, R., Marasteanu, O.M., Hozalski, R. and Clyne, T., (2005). Preliminary
laboratory investigation of enzyme solutions as a soil stabilizer, Report No.
MN/RC 200525, Department of Civil Engineering, Minnesota Department of
Transportation Research, Minneapolis.
Vucetic M. and Mortezaie . A., (2015)Cyclic secant shear modulus versus pore water
pressure in sands at small cyclic strains, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. (70), 6072.
Zhang, J., Andrus, R. D. and Juang, C. H., (2005). Normalized Shear Modulus and
Material Damping Ratio Relationships, Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131 (4): 453464.
ASCE
95
96
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ. Sirjan Brench, Sirjan, Iran. Email: mohammadizadeh@iausirjan.ac.ir
2
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Islamic Azad Univ. Sirjan Branch, Sirjan, Iran. Email:
mohammadizadeh@yahoo.com
Abstract: Due to use of pile foundations for important structures such as tall
chimneys, television towers, high rise buildings, high retaining walls, offshore
structures, safe and economic design of types of foundations under dynamic loading is
especially important. First of all, it is necessary to investigated complexity of the
issues related to the behavior of pile and pilesoil interaction evaluated the effects of
the earthquake and methods of foundations analysis. Interactions between the
components of the piled raft foundation have a significant influence on the analysis.
Therefore, the interaction effects have been fully considered. ABAQUS 6.10 Software
has been used for analysis models. The models have been calibrated against available
certified models. Researchers have rarely studied the effects of seismic stations for
piled raft foundations. To get comparable results, the accelerograms have been scaled
before performance of the piled raft foundation studied in two layers of soil media.
The effect of raft foundation thickness, length, and diameter of the piles have been
studied under the Bam earthquake accelerograms in the three of seismic stations. The
results show that maximum and differential settlement decreases and moment is
transferred to the cap pile increase when increase raft thickness.
INTRODUCTION
By increasing the population, requirements and the needs of human increase in the
construction of highrise buildings. In many cases, engineers are required to build
these structures on the loose soil. In order to transfer the weight of the structure to the
ground using the appropriate arrangements are required. One of the oldest methods to
overcome this problem use the pile foundations for improving bearing capacity of soil
and take advantage of bearing capacity of lower layers of soil that generally has more
bearing capacity than the upper layers. Lack of sufficient knowledge in the fields of
geotechnical has been increased value of safety factor.
Seismic pilesoil interaction can be an important consideration in evaluating the
seismic response of pile, particularly in soft soils and highrise buildings. Different
researchs had been done in this field and has made certain important achievements but
ASCE
extended field studies continue to discover the methods and expanding research to
realize the actual behavior of pilesoil interaction because it is the complexity and
scope. Nearfault ground motions often contain large longperiod pulses in the ground
motion (Somerville, 2002). The first seismological evidence of the nearfield
phenomenon was observed in the 1952 Kern County (Colifornia) earthquake. Benioff
reported the first nearfield earthquake in 1955(Benioff, 1955). Anderson et al. stated
that nonelastic response of a structure to nearfault ground motion is a function of
resistance and period of structure for the pulse period to the fundamental period of the
record and direction the rupture propagates are important parameters in The structure
of behaviour (Anderson et al., 1978). Leung et al. investigated the optimum length of
the piles in the group and the results of this study showed that proper alignment of the
optimal length of piles can dramatically increase the raft stiffness of and reduce
settlement of differences (Leung et al., 2009). Khoury et al. By using plaxis 3d
foundation software has been analyzed the tallest building in Brooklyn and after
completing structure, the results compared with measured results. The threedimensional finite element result match measured data (Khoury et al., 2011). Eslami et
al. By using ABAQUS software Analyzed piled raft foundation in two cases nonconnected and connection head piles with raft. The results showed that the use of nonconnection head piles with raft , axial stress piles strongly reduce and also focus on
piles in the central area of foundation lead to decrease maximum and differential
settlement (Eslami et al., 2011). Li et al. showed that spectra for seismic design takes
into account the nearfault effects, especially effects of large longperiod pulses in
nearfault ground motions, significantly enhance the seismic response of the
continuous girder bridge (Li et al., 2012).
Numerical Investigation
Finite Element Model, Boundary Conditions and Material Properties
Soil is a continuous porous media. The behavior of soil is in general nonlinear under
a large load at pile head. The MohrCoulomb model (MCM), which is an elasticperfect plastic model, can be applied for all types of soil. In this paper, by the Mohr
Coulomb failure criterion was used in modelling of interfaces behavior. The shear in
piles is significantly increased due to soilstructure interaction (SSI) effect as inertia of
the considerable foundation mass contributes to this increase in shear of pile. Thus,
neglecting SSI may lead to unsafe seismic design of piles. Since the focus of this
article is on seismic performance of group pile foundation, the superstructure was
modeled by lumped masses on pile cap (the weight of superstructure is 1000 tons) that
there are no significant difference between the results of this article with completely
modeling of superstructure. This approach used widely in different codes (Such as
Eurocode 8, 2006; API, 2006; IBC, 2009). Loads are applied in three steps. Step 1,
Geostatic step is used to establish insitu stresses in soil. Step 2, Static step is used to
apply weight of superstructure. Step 3, Dynamic step is used to input acceleration time
history at bedrock level in an explicit approach. The model includes 8node linear
brick, reduced integration (C3D8R) elements for soil, piles and pile cap and infinite
ASCE
97
98
(CIN3D8) element for edge models. To avoid reflections from the free edge of the
soil, an absorption region was used as shown in Fig. 1.
Behavioral
Model
Elastic
Modulus
(MPa)
Concrete
Piled Raft
Foundation
Soft Clay
Elastic
25000
0.2
MohrCoulomb
MohrCoulomb
5
40
Dense Sand
Poisson's Cohesion
Ratio
(KPa)
Unit
Weight
(KN/m3)
Angle of
Internal
Friction
()

0.3
10
16
0.3
42
17
24
The efficiency and behavior of piled raft foundation has been investigating in vertical
twolayer soil model. The mechanical properties used for the piles and the soils are
summarized in Table 1. The soils domain are discretized by finite and infinite
elements as shown in Fig. 2. A bedrock depth 30 meters was selected that soft clay is
between depths of below ground level and 10 meters and dense sand is between
depths of 10 meters and 30 meters. Assume that soils are dry.
The Bam earthquake on 26 December 2003 with magnitude Mw=6.6 destroyed most
of the city of Bam in Iran and nearby villages, and killed more than 26,000
people(Manafpour, 2008). Largeamplitude groundmotions recorded at the Bam
accelerograph station in the center of Bam city by the Building and Housing Research
ASCE
99
Center (BHRC) of Iran. We used acceleration records of the Bam earthquake at three
BHRC strong motion stations (Bam, Shahdad, and MohammadAbad) that they are
distance of 0 km, 37.12 km and 84.48 km from the epicenter, respectively.
Acceleration/time graphs are shown in Fig. 3. Scaled to a peak ground acceleration
similar to the all accelerograms. The 3D model shown in Figure 2 is asymmetric
because the earthquake is applied along one horizontal direction(X direction) only.
Pilesoil contact and raftsoil were applied in both normal and tangential directions
and one normal direction, respectively. whereas in the normal direction hard contact
was utilized and frictional behavior was chosen for the tangential direction. The
coefficient of friction is constant value 0.2 between clay soil and pile surface, and
2
constant value = tan( ) between sandy soil and pile surface. The effect of
3
reducing the coefficient of friction is ignored contact between the pile and the
adjacent soil.
recorded in Bam station
equivalent linear approach used to consider the effects of soil nonlinearity under
applied earthquakes. In order to perform the equivalent linear analysis, a linear
analysis was carried out with assumed initial values for the equivalent linear material
parameters including damping ratio () and shear modulus ratio (G/Gmax) of the model
(Fatahi et al., 2013). A popular spectral damping scheme that is consistent with experiment
data is Rayleigh damping, giving damping matrix [C] as the combination of massproportional
damping and stiffnessproportional damping, as shown in Equation 1. For the multiple degrees
of freedom system, the critical damping ratio at any frequency of mode is given as Equation 2.
The coefficients R and R can be determined from specific i and j for the ith and jth modes,
ASCE
100
respectively. If both modes are assumed to have the same damping ratio , the Rayleigh
coefficients can be calculated using Equation 3.The calculated Rayleigh damping
coefficients can be directly input into ABAQUS to form a damping matrix in the
dynamic equilibrium equation(AlQadi et al., 2008).
[C] = R [M] + R [K]
(1)
R Ri
+
2i
2
(2)
i =
R =
2i j
i + j
, R =
2
i + j
(3)
where R and R are Rayleigh coefficients, i is the critical damping ratio at the
frequency of i, i and j are vibration frequencies of the ith and jth modes.
Verification
Pile group analysis is investigated firstly by Poulos for 9 pile case (Poulos, 2001). A
number of different methods have been used for this model by different researchers.
The details of this model are shown on Fig.4. In Fig.5, the analysis results of this
model are given. It can be seen that analysis in the finite element
software Abaqus 6.10 (SIMULIA, 2010) gives relatively small average settlement
compared to other methods.
FIG. 5. Comparison of pile groups analysis result with the other methods
ASCE
101
As shown in Fig.6, The increase in raft thickness reduces the differential settlement
in the raft foundations due to the decreased flexibility of the foundation. Differential
settlement of rafts in Bam station is more than other station because the maximum
observed intensity generally occurs near the epicenter. Accelerations have been scaled
the same in all stations, so there is no significant difference between results.
ASCE
102
Moment (KN.m)
As shown in Fig.7, The increase in raft th ickness reduces the maximum settlement
in the foundations. The maximum settlements are almost constant when The rafts of
thickness are more than 1 m, due to their very large the radius of curvature. the
maximum settlement of a flexible loaded raft was occurred in the middle that
differential settlement between center and edge decrease with increase of raft
thickness.
As shown in Fig.8, The maximum positive moment in raft along longitudinal axis
increases with increase of raft thickness. In all cases, the maximum bending moment
has occurred in the middle part of the raft but decreased at the center of raft
foundation (where placed the pile). Modulus of elasticity is higher
soil in middle part than that in edge because freedom of soil at the edges can be greater
than at the center. Soil in middle part tolerates a greater stress than others area and
produces more bending moment in middle part. Different frequency contents in three
stations due to moment in raft along longitudinal axis is slightly different
, especially at the edges.
CONCLUSIONS
ASCE
has occurred in the middle part of the raft. The bending moment is increased
with increasing raft thickness.
4 Different frequency contents in three stations due to the results is slightly
different because accelerations have been scaled the same in all stations.
REFERENCES
ASCE
103
104
Study on the 3D Nonlinear Artificial Boundary of Viscoelastic Media with the Standard Linear Solid
Model
1
Bo Zhang ; Xueying Yang ; Jie Li ; Wentao Dong ; Ruisong Pan ; Weimin Yang ; Lei Yang ; and
8
Dunfu Zhang
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, PR China. Email: zhangbo1977@sdu.edu.cn
Lecturer, Shandong Urban Construction Vocational College, Jinan, Shandong, PR China. Email: 274679821@qq.com
3
Lecturer, Shandong Urban Construction Vocational College, Jinan, Shandong, PR China. Email: 331403425@qq.com
4
Lecturer, Shandong Urban Construction Vocational College, Jinan, Shandong, PR China. Email: 18162270@qq.com
5
Lecturer, Shandong Urban Construction Vocational College, Jinan, Shandong, PR China. Email: 369950212@qq.com
6
Associate Professor, Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, PR China. Email:
weimin.yang@sdu.edu.cn
7
Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, PR China. Email: yanglei@sdu.edu.cn
8
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, PR China. Email: zhangdf@sdu.edu.cn
2
Abstract: The three dimensional nonlinear viscoelastic artificial boundary is deduced based on
the principle that the stress on the artificial boundary equals to that of viscoelastic media with
the standard linear solid model. The numerical examples show that this proposed nonlinear
viscoelastic artificial boundary is of high accuracy in simulating the radiation damping of
viscoelastic media with the standard linear solid model.
Keywords: Artificial boundary; Viscoelastic media; Radiation damping; Standard linear solid model.
Introduction
The interior sources can excite body waves and surface waves to radiate to the far field. The wave
motion amplitudes attenuate geometrically, which is called radiation damping. The artificial boundary
should simulate the radiation damping of the far field cut from the computing field(Grange et al.2008;
Zohra and Loret.2004). The exterior source is energy propagating from the far field, such as seismic
waves and blasting waves.
By far many kinds of artificial boundary have been developed. Lysmer and Kulemeyer (1969)
introduced the classical viscous boundary, but the viscous boundary condition only consists of dashpots
without considering the spring recovery ability of the artificial boundary. Clayton and Engquist (1977)
developed an absorbing boundary for acoustic and elastic wave which was called ClaytonEngquist
boundary. Deeks and Randolph (1994) and Liu et al(2005) expressed the viscoelastic boundary based on
the principle that the stress on the artificial boundary equals to that of original media. The nonlinear
viscoelastic artificial boundary used by Liu et al(2005) are all based on the assumption that the far field
media are viscoelastic materials with the Kelvin model. To date the mostly used viscoelastic model in
solving viscoelastic solid problems is the standard linear solid model. So in this paper the three
dimensional nonlinear viscoelastic artificial boundary was deduced from the assumption that the far field
media are viscoelastic materials with the standard linear solid model. The related numerical examples
have demonstrated that the proposed nonlinear viscoelastic artificial boundary is of high accuracy in
dealing with problems of simulating the radiation damping of the far field.
The normal boundary equations of wave motion in viscoelastic media with the standard linear
solid model
Combining the elastic wave theory and viscoelastic theory , the normal stress at viscoelastic media
boundary with the standard linear solid model can be deduced as
ASCE
1
R
= KN (a1 + k1i)
105
1 (a1 +k1i)R it
1
1
e
e CN k1 +( a1 + 2 )ie(a +k i)Reit
2
R
R
R
R
1
= K N u ( R, t ) C N u ( R, t )
Where K N = K
(1)
3 R
(a1 + 1 / R) 2 + k12
(a1 +1/ R) 2 + k12
4
1
1
+ Gi k11+ 2
3
R (a1 +1/ R)2 + k12
(2a)
1
1
1
1
+ Gr k1 1 2
C N = Kk1 1 2
2
2
2
2
R (a1 + 1 / R) + k1 3
R (a1 + 1 / R) + k1
4 3 k2(a 1/ R) + a12(a1 +1/ R)
+ Gi + 1 1
(2b)
3 R
(a1 +1/ R)2 + k12
In Eq. (1) it is clear that the normal stress and displacement in the original field are equivalent to those
of a springdamper model . The spring stiffness coefficient KN and damper viscous coefficient CN are
expressed in Eqs.(2a) and (2b). This is the normal artificial boundary used in viscoelastic medium with
the standard linear solid model deduced in this paper.
The tangential boundary equations of wave motion in viscoelastic media with the standard linear
solid model
Combining the elastic wave theory and viscoelastic theory , the shear stress at viscoelastic media
boundary with the standard linear solid model can be deduced as
u (R,t) us (R,t)
(R, t) =G* (i)(R,t) =G*(i) s
R
R
2
2
(3)
= Gr (a 2 + ) k k 2 u s ( R, t ) Gi (a 2 + ) + Gk k 2 / u s ( R, t )
R
R
In Eq. (3) it is clear that the shear stress in the original field are equivalent to that of a springdamper
model. The spring stiffness coefficient KT and damper viscous coefficient CT are expressed in Eqs. (4a)
and (4b). This is the tangential artificial boundary used in viscoelastic medium with the standard linear
solid model deduced in this paper.
2
(4a)
K T = G r (a 2 + ) G i k 2
R
2
(4b)
C T = G r k 2 / + G i (a 2 + )
R
Numerical example
A P wave motion problem is analyzed to verify the ability of the artificial boundary deduced in this
paper by simulating the radiation damping of the far field viscoelastic media with the standard linear
solid model. The computation model is shown in FIG.1. The parameters of the material are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1 Parameters of the materials in numerical example 1
Parameters
G (GPa)
v
(kg/m3)
(MPah)
Material constants
1
0.25
1000
20
ASCE
Where the expression of T(t) and S(x,z) are expressed in two cases as follows.
In case 1, the load is a simple harmonic load.
1 x 1, z 2
T(t ) = sin(3.14 t ) S(x, z) =
else
0
In case 2, the load is a nonsimple harmonic load.
t 0 t 1
1 x 1, z 2
0
else
0
else
FIG.2 Comparison of the response at observation point A(0,0,0) under simple harmonic
load in case 1
FIG.3 Comparison of the response at observation point A(0,0,0) under simple nonharmonic load
in case 2
ASCE
106
In the FIG.1 the boundary of the computing field is used with fixed boundary, the artificial boundary
derived in this paper and the remote artificial boundary respectively. The remote artificial boundary
means that there is enough distance between the wave origin and the boundary to avoid the wave
reflection. So when it is difficult to get the analytical solution on wave motion problems, the wave
motion results with remote boundary can be taken as the exact solution[9][12]. But as the computing cost
with remote boundary is too high to use in solving engineering problems, so the remote boundary mostly
is used as exact solution in verifying some problems.
From the FIG.2 and FIG.3, it can be seen that the fixed boundary has bad precision in simulating the
radiation damping of the far field. The results with the artificial boundary deduced in this paper is almost
the same with the exact solution (remote artificial boundary), which shows that the artificial boundary
derived in this paper can simulate the radiation damping of the far field viscoelastic media with the
standard linear solid model precisely.
CONCLUSIONS
(1) In order to simulate the radiation damping of the far field in viscoelastic media with the standard
linear solid model, in this paper an artificial boundary is deduced combining the elastic wave theory and
the viscoelasticity theory.
(2) The related numerical examples have demonstrated that the proposed artificial boundary is of high
accuracy in dealing with problems of simulating the radiation damping of the far field in viscoelastic
media with the standard linear solid model.
(3) The artificial boundary derived in this paper is easily combined with general FEM software, and
can be used to analyze complex foundationstructure interaction problems.
Acknowledgements
This paper is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.51379114, 51279095,
51479107, 51304125, 51509146), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China
(ZR2012EEQ007) .
REFERENCES
Grange, S., Kotronis, P., and Mazars, J.,2008. A macroelement for a circular foundation to simulate 3D
soilstructure interaction International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in
Geomechanics , Vol. 32(10):12051227.
Zohra, Z. and Loret, B.,2004. A viscous boundary for transient analyses of fluidsaturated porous
media Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 33(2): 89110.
Lysmer, J. and Kulemeyer, R. L.,1969. Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media Journal of
Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) , Vol. 95(4):859877.
Clayton, R. and Engquist, B.,1977. Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Acoustic and Elastic Wave
Equations Journal Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , Vol.76(2) : 15291540.
Deeks, A. J. and Randolph, M. F.,1994. Axisymmetric Time Domain Transmitting Boundaries
Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 120(1):25 42.
LIU, J., WANG, Z., DU, X., et al,2005. Threedimensional viscoelastic artificial boundaries in time
domain for wave motion problems Engineering Mechanics , Vol. 22 (6):4651.
ASCE
107
Professional Engineering, Institute of Building Science of Fujian Province China, Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350025, Peoples R China. Email: 342110814@qq.com
2
Professional Engineering, Institute of Building Science of Fujian Province China, Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350025, Peoples R China. Email: zjs0607@126.com
3
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No.2 Xueyuan Rd., Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350108, Peoples R China (corresponding author). Email: huangfuyun@fzu.edu.cn
4
Graduate Student, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No.2 Xueyuan Rd., Fuzhou, Fujian
Province 350108, Peoples R China. Email: 350635311@qq.com
Abstract: Soil liquefaction induced by earthquake will cause very large damage to
structures, especially to the pile foundations. Prestressed highstrength concrete (PHC)
pipepiles were regarded as the relatively economic and effective piles in practical
engineering. However, the failure modes of PHC pipepiles and the interaction of soilpile with or without liquefiable soils are still unclear. A testing on the seismic failure
mode of PHC pipepiles in liquefiable soils had been conducted under Shaking Table.
The PHC pipepiles were employed and tested under a series of sine and EICentro
earthquake waves as well as artificial ground motions based on insite, and the
particular attention was paid to the failure mode of the piles and basic experimental
phenomena during soils liquefaction. The testing results demonstrate that the presence
of prestress can significantly improve antiseismic shear forces and the failure modes of
PHC pipepiles in liquefiable soil have a little different.
INTRODUCTION
Prestressed highstrength concrete (PHC) pipepiles regarded as the relatively
economic type of pile foundation, is widely used in the coastal soft soil area of China,
especially in Fujian Province due to high axial bearing capacity, convenient
construction and favorable quality (Shi 2004). However, PHC pipepile, a typical thinwalled concrete member, is disadvantageous for the flexural capacity and weak shear
resistance (Lu 2006). The damage of PHC pipepiles on construction and earthquake
attracted a lot of attention, which induced the limit use in the code of design of building
foundation of liquable soil in Fujian Province (Huang 2008). Nevertheless, there are
still a number of PHC pipepiles that had been used in liquable soil area. The response
and earthquake fortification of PHC pipepiles in liquable soil area should be taken
consideration, and they are necessary to carry out in these researches.
ASCE
108
ASCE
109
110
6@60
6@60
330
330
2090
2040( 3m)/1040
2.5m
330
330
6@30
6@30
6@60
6@60
6@60
6@60
6@30
6@30
52.5
50 52.5
52.5
52.5 50
155
155
ASCE
NO.
PHC1
PHC2
PHC3
111
Moisture Content
(%)
26.2
internal friction
angle ()
14.2
To simulate the liquation of soil, first soil layer is selected as clay to get confining
pressure, and the second layer is mud and sand. Thickness of clay is 0.35m while that
of mud and sand is 2.1m. According to cumulative curve of grain composition of mud
and sand, its known that d60=0.57 mm and d10=0.18 mm (shown in Figure 3), which
means middle grain size accounting for larger proportion. In addition, nonuniform
coefficient Cu equals to 3.17 (<5), which means good uniformity of the soil, and more
details are shown in Table 3.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
0.1
0.01
(mm)
ASCE
112
superstructure inertial mass was placed with two sensors (A7, A8) totally along the xdirection; other five acceleration sensors (A9A13) are arranged along embedded
depthdirection to get acceleration of farfield soil.
This experiment will be judged by the liquefaction of sand through pore water
pressure ratio and liquefaction macroscopic phenomena. Therefore, pressure cells of
pore water and soil were placed. Six earth pressure gauges (T1T6) were selected and
arranged along the pile. As the number of devices is limited, only three pore water
pressure gauges (K1K3) and two displacement meters (D1, D2) were selected and
arranged vertically along the soil. The arrangement for all measuring points and sensors
is shown in Figure 4.
A8
Superstructure
Inertial mass
Displacement meter
Strain gage
D2
A7
S5
S12
400
K1
S13
S14
S15
S1
S16
T4
A4
A11
T5
A10
A3
T6
A2
D1
100
T3 A12
A9
450
S2
A5
K2
K3
A13
T2
450
S3
T1
A6
450
350
S4
500
Voidpressure cell
S10
S11
400
350 350
S9
S7
S6
450
S8
450
350
Accelerometer
A1
Shaking table
Shaking table
Vibration Direction
Vibration Direction
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.06
0
0
10
15
20
0.02
0.04
0.06
25
30
0
0
10
15
0.02
0.04
0.06
ASCE
113
Chinese code (2006). PHC2 and PHC3 pile were covered with overlying clay, while
PHC1 pile without overlying clay.
The loading system for the piles of PHC1, PHC2 and PHC3 were identical to have
26 cases. In order to study the effect of liquefaction and compare the difference, each
case involved in the soil with unsaturated soil first (Condition 1) and then in saturated
soil (condition 2). Case 14 were the sine wave with peak acceleration at 0.0414g and
Case 58 are the Chichi wave with 0.0414g to 0.1656g mainly identified the elastic
behavior and response. The peak acceleration of El Centro wave and artificial wave had
nine levels of 0.0414g, 0.0828g, 0.1242g, 0.1656g, 0.2070g, 0.2484g, 0.2898g,
0.3312g, and 0.3726g from small to large, respectively. In addition, 0.0414g and
0.0828g means about the frequent earthquakes of VII and VIII intensity degree
respectively, while 0.1242g, 0.2484g, and 0.3726g means about the rare earthquakes of
VI, VII, and VIII intensity degree respectively.
At each change of peak acceleration, white noise scanning was adopted to measure
dynamic characteristics of the system and identify the damage levels. The testing cases
are shown in Table 4.
Cases
14
58
917
1826
Seismic Wave
Condition
Sine wave(1Hz, 2Hz,
0.0414
4Hz, 8 Hz)
Unsaturated/
Chichi
0.0414, 0.0828, 0.1242, 0.1656
Saturated
Elcentro
0.0414, 0.0828, 0.1242, 0.1656, 0.2070,
0.2482, 0.2898, 0.3312, 0.3726
Artificial wave
The subsidence of soil surface will be happened under the shaking table. It is about
1.5cm averagely for the unsaturated soil (1.6cm for the PHC1 pile, 1.4cm for PHC2
ASCE
114
and 1.5 cm for PHC3), while for the saturated soil, the surface subsidence is over
6.0cm. It demonstrates that saturated sand is easier to get dense and the surface
subsidence is also larger than unsaturated soil. In addition, lots of water will be bubbled
(water spraying and sand emitting), just as shown in Figure 6.
When the soil is unsaturated, there is almost no separation between the pile and its
surround sand after all of 26 cases have been tested. While in the saturated soil, the
sand surface is observed to be covered by a layer of mud and the closer to the pile, the
thicker of the layer of mud is. When the clay layer is removed, it can be found that the
closer to the pile, the greater of the surface subsidence. The soil and the pile at the
interface have separated with the width of 1.5cm, as shown in Figure 7.
Cracks
500
0.50
1060
1.06
Interface between
250
280
0.28 0.25
Soil surface
Soil surface
Crack
Crack
PHC1
PHC2
PHC1
PHC2
ASCE
pile depth if one section cracks. Therefore, after increasing the peak ground
acceleration, more deep cracks (second and third) will be appeared.
Generally, the position of crack and the maximum position of bending moment adapt
accordingly, but for foundation in liquable soil, cracks will be occurred in the junction
of soil (interface between 1st and 2nd layer) and liquefaction region. The reason is
mainly due to the pile is in the sand liquefaction area, where the rigid of ground soil is
changed dramatically, which induce the shear force resistance reduce greatly and thus
crack forms.
CONCLUSIONS
1) Experiment shows that the responses of PHC pipepiles of saturated soil are more
obvious than that of unsaturated soil especially the frequency of excitation is close to
the structure. The saturated sand is easier to subsidence than unsaturated soil, and
finally the phenomena of water spraying and sand emitting are happened.
2) Experiment also shows that the presence of prestress can significantly improve antiseismic shear forces. The failure modes of PHC pipepiles in liquefiable soil have a
little different. For foundation in liquable soil, cracks occur mainly in the junction of
soil and liquefaction region due to the rigid of ground soil is changed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors appreciate the support of Natural Science Foundation of China (No:
51578161, 51278126, 2010Y0101).
REFERENCES
Chung, SG. and Kim, SR. (2007). "Appraisal of true resistance of phc pipepiles
driven in thick soft deposit." 2007 International Forum on Strategic Technology :
109112.
Gao A. (2012). Experimented research on seismic performance of PHC pipe pile and
analysis of bearing capacity. Tianjin University, Dissertation.
Hokmabadi, A. S. Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). "Physical modeling of seismic soilpilestructure interaction for buildings on soft soils." International Journal of
Geomechanics, Vol. 15(2).
Hokmabadi, A. S. Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014). "Assessment of soilpilestructure
interaction influencing seismic response of midrise buildings sitting on floating pile
foundations. " Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 55: 172186.
Huang, Liangji. Lin, Yixi. Cai, Jian. and Zhou, Wanqing. (2008). "Dynamic and static
comparative analyses of settlements of over length PHC pipe piles." Rock and Soil
Mechanics, Vol. 29 (2): 507511,516.
Li, Y.C. Xing, K.Y. Liu, H. et al. (2013). "Experimental study of seismic performance
of PHC pipe pile considering soilpilestructure interaction." Chinese Journal of
Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 32 (2): 401410.
Lu, WT. Wang YH. and Leng, WM. (2006). "Testing and numerical analysis of load
transfer mechanism of PHC pipepile." Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 27 (3): 466470.
Mohamed, R. Towhata, I. Honda, T. Tabata, K. and Abe, A. (2013). "Pile group
response to liquefactioninduced lateral spreading: edefense large shake table test. "
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51, 3546.
Nagae T., Hayashi S. (2003). Earthquakeresistant property of prefabricated highstrength concrete pile. ASCE, High Performance Materials in Bridges, 2003:173182.
ASCE
115
Rong, X. Xu, XZ. Li, YY. (2012). "Experimental research on aseismic behavior of
PHC pipe piles." Industrial Construction, Vol. 43 (7): 7275.
Shi, F. (2004). "Experimental research on load transfer mechanism of pretensioned
high strength spun concrete piles." Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,
Vol. 26 (1): 9599.
Sun, Ye. and Liu, Zuhua. (2012). "Strain distributing disciplinarian of phc pipepiles
under seismic action." Low Temperature Architecture Technology, Vol. 165: 2427.
Tang, L. and Ling, XZ. (2014). "Response of a RC pile group in liquefiable soil: a
shaketable investigation." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 67:
301315.
ASCE
116
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS),
Sydney, Australia. Email: Quoc.V.Nguyen1@student.uts.edu.au
2
Senior Lecturer, Geotechnical Engineering (Ph.D., CP.Eng.), School of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. Email: Behzad.fatahi@uts.edu.au
3
Geotechnical Engineer (Ph.D., CP.Eng.), Ove Arup & Partners, Hong Kong. Email:
aslan.shokmabadi@arup.com
ASCE
117
The results of the first three factors can be summarised as freefield ground motion.
However, the foundation of a structure does not follow the deformation of the freefield
motion due to its stiffness, and the dynamic response of the structure itself induces the
deformation of the supporting soil (Kramer, 1996). Two key mechanisms are generally
involved during a seismic soilfoundationstructure interaction: kinematic interaction
and inertial interaction. Kinematic interaction occurs because stiff foundation elements
in the soil cause the foundation motion to deviate from the free field ground motion.
Kinematic interaction could also be due to ground motion incoherence, foundation
embedment effects, and wave scattering or inclination (Stewart et al., 1999). Inertial
interaction results from the inertia developed in the structure as its own vibration
produces base shear, moment, and torsional excitation. These loads cause displacements
and the foundation to rotate relative to the free field condition (Kramer and Stewart,
2004). Fundamentally, the size of a foundation can influence the kinematic and inertial
interactions mainly by altering the mass and stiffness of the soil foundation system
which in turn influences the seismic response of the superstructure.
Several researchers (e.g. Sbartai, 2015; Sameti and Ghannad, 2014; Chen, 2015;
Hokmabadi et al., 2014) studied the seismic soilfoundationstructure interaction (SFSI)
phenomena and its influence on the seismic response of buildings by adopting the
Winkler (substructure) methods and the numerical methods. Adopting advanced
numerical models has a number of advantages over the Winkler methods, especially
their ability to conduct time history analyses while considering effects such as the
nonlinear stressstrain behaviour of the soil and the superstructure, material and
radiation damping, advance boundary conditions, and interface elements. Another
advantage of using numerical methods is their ability to perform the analysis in a
fullycoupled manner without resorting to independent calculations of site or
superstructure response (Meymand, 1998). Consequently, numerical modelling
predictions can capture the different parameters involved in soilfoundationstructure
interaction (SFSI) that are closer to reality.
The aim of this study is to numerically investigate the influence of shallow foundation
size on the seismic response of a regular midrise moment resisting building frame
during earthquake excitations using ABAQUS software (version 6.12) as a fully
coupled nonlinear time history analysis.
NUMERICAL MODEL
Case study description
In this study, a fifteen storey concrete moment resisting building frame, 45 m high and
12 m wide with 16 columns consisting of three spans in each direction, and 15 slabs and
a foundation, is selected (FIG. 1). This building frame represents conventional midrise
moment resisting buildings. The structural sections were specified after conducting a
routine design procedure regulated in the relevant building codes (AS3600, 2009,
AS1170.4, 2007). SAP2000 V 14 (CSI, 2010) software was utilised for the structural
analysis and design of the cross sections of beams and columns. Then, a nonlinear
timehistory dynamic analysis under the influence of the four earthquake ground
motions shown in FIG. 1 was carried out. In this dynamic analysis the geometric
nonlinearity and PDelta effects were considered according to AS3600 (2009). The
fundamental frequency of the adopted building was 0.830 Hz and its total mass was
1683 tonnes.
ASCE
118
Th
he adopted superstructurre sits on 30m deep softt soil that is categorised as Class Ee
acco
ording to thee Australian standard (AS
S1170.4, 20007). The subbsoil is a sofft clayey soill
with
h a density of
o 1470 kg/m
m3, a shear wave velocityy of 150 m/s,, and anundrrained shearr
strength of 50 kPa.
k The prop
perties of thiis subsoil weere extractedd from actuaal insitu andd
oratory testss (Rahvar, 2006),
2
so th
hese parameeters have m
merit over thhe assumedd
labo
paraameters whicch may not be
b completelly conforminng to reality.. It was assum
med that thee
watter table was below the leevel of the bedrock.
b
Th
he shallow square foun
ndations (foo
otings) weree designed tto support thhe structuree
agaiinst static an
nd dynamic loads to saatisfy the reqquirement foor bearing ccapacity andd
max
ximum settleement. All th
he shallow fo
oundations w
were 1 m thiick and weree made from
m
rein
nforced conccrete. The sh
hallow found
dations had ddifferent sizze widths to facilitate ann
inveestigation in
nto how shaallow found
dation sizes influence thhe seismic response off
buillding due to
o the soilfou
undationstrructure interaaction. Thesse foundatioons had fivee
diffferent sizes, including:
i
1.1B, 1.3B, 1.5B, 1.7B annd 2.0B, wheere B is the w
width of thee
buillding (=12 m). All theese foundatio
on sizes weere acceptabble from ann engineerss
persspective and satisfied the requireements for bearing caapacity andd maximum
m
settllement, altho
ough the saffety factor off the smallerr foundationss was less thhan the largee
ones. Moreoverr, although th
he 1.7B and 2.0B foundaations are noot common inn practice, a
wid
der range of foundation sizes
s
was co
onsidered in this study too better undeerstand how
w
foun
ndation size affects the seismic resp
ponse of a bbuilding durring strong eearthquakes.
Thee seismic response of th
hese foundaation sizes aare compareed and discuussed in thee
following sectio
ons via a 3D finite elemeent numericaal simulationn.
FIG. 1. Pro
oblem defin
nition and modelling
m
eleement detaiils of the devveloped
so
oilfoundatiionstructurre system
Num
merical Modelling Deta
ails
ABAQUS
A
v 6.14 finite element anaalysis softwaare was useed in this sttudy for thee
num
merical simu
ulation of thee soilfoundationstructuure systems.. This software packagee
can simulate co
omplex prob
blems that require
r
largee computational memorries using a
o analysis. Beam
B
and sh
hell elementss were used tto simulate tthe columnss
direect method of
and
d floor slabs of the supersstructure in this
t numericcal model. T
The characterristics of thee
ASCE
119
120
columns are presented in Table 1. The structural elements were modelled using an
elasticviscoelastic constitutive model while considering the Rayleigh damping
according to Ryan and Polanco (2008) (Equation (1)).
[C] = [M] + [K]
(1)
where [C], [M], and [K] are the damping, mass, and stiffness matrices, respectively,
and are the model coefficients used to specify the model damping ratio in two modes.
By assuming the same damping ratio () for two modes with frequencies fi and fj, the
model coefficients and can be obtained from equations for Rayleigh damping in
Chopra (2007). In this study, a structural damping ratio () of 5% together with model
coefficients of = 0.3996 and = 0.0049, calculated based on the first and second mode
frequencies of the structure (see Table 2), was used to simulate structural damping in the
dynamic analysis.
Table 1. Adopted characteristics of designed reinforced concrete column sections
Section Type
Type I (Levels 1 3)
Type II (Levels 4 7)
Type III (Levels 8 11)
Type IV (Levels 12 15)
Ix (m4)
5.33E3
3.64E3
2.40E3
1.50E3
E (kPa)
2.86E7
2.86E7
2.86E7
2.86E7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
kg/m
Shear Wave Velocity
150
Vs
m/s
Poissons ratio
0.4
Plasticity Index
15%
PI
For the soilfoundationstructure interaction analysis in this study, surfacebased
contacts were defined such that the master surface is the top surface of the soil and the
ASCE
121
slav
ve surface is
i the botto
om surface of the fouundation. M
Moreover, finnite slidingg
form
mulation and the surfaccetosurfacee discretisattion methodd were utiliised for thee
con
ntacts. The mechanical
m
prroperties of the contact surfaces deffining the tanngential andd
norm
mal behavio
our of the co
ontact surfaaces can inflluence the rresults of the numericall
mod
delling and should be chosen
c
with
h great rigorr. Normal bbehaviour addopts hard
con
ntact in a presssureover cllosure relatio
onship. A FO
ORTRAN suubroutine, FR
RIC_COEF,,
is em
mbedded intto ABAQUS
S to simulatee the tangent
ntial behaviouur of the conntacts basedd
on MohrCoulo
M
omb failure model.
m
Fo
our strong eaarthquake input motions, including thhe 1994 Norrthridge, the 1995 Kobe,,
the 1940 El Ceentro, and th
he 1968 Hachinohe earthhquakes (refferring to FIIG. 2), weree
imp
posed onto the
t finite ellement num
merical modeel while connducting a ttimehistoryy
anallysis. Due to
o the large sizze of the mo
odel (around 70 Gigabyttes for a singgle case), thee
fastt computatio
on facilities were used to
t conduct thhis timehisstory analysiis, and evenn
then
n it took arou
und 50 hourss to run a sing
gle case undeer the applieed earthquake excitation.
Thee results of th
he 3D finite element
e
num
merical simullation are preesented and discussed inn
the following seection.
(a))
(b)
(c)
(d)
FIG.
F
2. Adop
pted earthquake record
ds: : (a) 19994 Northridgge; (b) 19955 Kobe;
(c) 1940 El Ceentro; and (d
d) 1968 Hacchinohe earrthquake
RESULTS AN
ND DISCUSS
SION
Th
he results of
o the 3D nu
umerical mo
odel developped for the fifteenstorrey buildingg
supp
ported by shallow
s
fou
undations off different ssizes and th
the fixedbaase buildingg
subjjected to thee 1994 Nortthridge, 1995 Kobe, 19440 El Centroo, and 19688 Hachinohee
eartthquakes aree summarised and compared in FIG
G. 3 and FIG
G.4. Referringg to FIG. 3,
SFS
SI amplified
d the maximu
um lateral deflection
d
off the supersttructure durring shakingg
exciitations. Forr instance, th
he maximum
m lateral defo
formation off the fixedbaase buildingg
ASCE
122
(exccluding SFS
SI) under thee 1994 North
hridge earthqquake was 3395mm, whiile the samee
buillding experieenced a lateral deformattion of up too 590 mm (449% more) w
when it wass
supp
ported by a 1.1B shallow
w foundation
n that accounnts for SFSI.. Moreover, as a generall
tren
nd, by increaasing the sizee of the shalllow foundattion from 1.11B to 2.0B tthe structuree
experiences lesss lateral deeformation. For instancce, an increease in the size of thee
foun
ndation from
m 1.1B to 1.5
5B resulted in
n up to 25% less lateral ddeformationn under 19400
El Centro earth
hquake (FIG
G. 13a). Th
his is a connsiderable rreduction inn the laterall
defo
ormation of a structure subjected
s
to strong earthqquakes.
(a)
(c))
(b)
(d)
FIIG. 3. Maxim
mum lateral deflection of the fifteeenstorey strructure sup
pported by
sha
allow founda
ations with varies sizes under the iinfluence off: (a) 1994 N
Northridge;
(b) 1995
5 Kobe; (c) 1940 El Cen
ntro; (d) 19668 Hachinoohe earthquaakes
In
n order to in
nvestigate the influence foundation ssize on the energy absoorbed by thee
stru
ucture during
g earthquakes, the resultss of the deveeloped 3D nuumerical moodel in termss
of shear
s
forces were compaared for diffferent cases.. To determiine the maxximum shearr
forcce at each level, the sh
hear forces generated
g
inn every coluumn at thatt level weree
sum
mmed up in every
e
time in
ncrement du
uring the tim
mehistory annalysis, and tthe absolutee
max
ximum sheaar force expeerienced at that
t
level duuring the eaarthquake is reported ass
pressented in FIG. 4. In gen
neral, consid
dering SFSI contributedd to the reduuction in thee
ASCE
123
(b)
(c)
(d)
ASCE
124
Yan Liu1; Junliang Tao2; Xinbao Yu3; Zhen Liu4; and Xiong (Bill) Yu5
Abstract: Seismic methods are useful tools to nondestructively assess the behaviors
of fresh concrete. They have also been applied to characterize the properties of
curing concrete to provide information for construction decision. This paper shows
that freezing of concrete significantly affects the engineering properties of concrete.
In the experimental program, ultrasonic tests were conducted on curing concrete
subjected to different freezing process. The results indicate while there exists linear
correlation between low strain seismic wave velocity and concrete strength under
normal curing conditions, such relationships do not hold if the concrete is subjected to
freezing process. A correction accounting for the effects of ice on the bulk strength
needs to be applied. This correction was found to have linear relationship with water
content. Procedures to correct the effects of freezing are proposed, which include the
use of Time Domain Reflectometry to measure the water content. Finally the strength
of concrete in frozen status can be estimated. This information could be incorporated
to determine the magnitude of Winter Load Increase in cold regions for government
agencies.
INTRODUCTION
The evaluation of mechanical properties of concrete by nondestructive techniques
is gaining popularity. Several techniques are currently in use, such as impact echo,
ultrasonic test, spectra analyses of surface wave. They are based on the information
contained in the propagation of ultrasonic waves. Different wave modes and
transceiving methods are explored. For example, Boutin1 and Arnaud used the speed
of longitudinal waves (Lwaves, also known as compression waves) of low
frequencies from measuring the time of transition between fluid and solid state of
cellular cement paste. A new device for monitoring the hydration of cement mortar
that measures the transit time and the energy of an Lwave pulse propagating through
a mortar sample has been introduced by Reinhardt2 et al. With this device the setting
and hardening process of mortar can be evaluated. Other investigators have applied
both, longitudinal and transverse waves (Twaves, also known as shear waves) to
examine the hydration of cementitious materials. Sayers3 and Grenfell found a linear
relationship between the effective bulk and shear moduli determined by pulse
ASCE
125
126
ASCE
127
Lwaves and compressive strength has been presented by Pessiki7 and Carin. Within
the scope of this work concrete mixtures with different watercement ratios and
aggregate contents cured at three different temperatures were examined. The Lwave
velocity was determined by using the impactecho method in a time range of up to 28
days. At early ages the Lwave velocity increases at a faster rate when compared with
the compressive strength and at later ages the strength is the faster developing
quantity. Lwave velocity is found to be a sensitive indicator of the changes in the
compressive strength up to 3 days after mixing.
From the measured ultrasonic velocity, two different types of moduli, i.e,
longitudinal and shear modulus can be calculated as follows:
L = v L2
(1)
G = vT2
(2)
where L is the longitudinal modulus, G the shear modulus and vL and vT the velocity
of L and Twaves respectively. The moduli L and G are related to the direction of
particle motion caused by L and Twaves. The longitudinal modulus relates strain to
longitudinally applied stress. The shear modulus describes the elastic behavior of a
material subjected to shear strain.
Time Domain Reflectometry
Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) is a guided radar technology. It utilizes the
propagation of electromagnetic wave to measure materials properties and structural
responses. The configuration of a typical TDR system is shown in Figure 2(a), which
includes a TDR device (pulse generator and sampler), a connection cable, and a
measurement probe. The measurement probe generally consists of multiple
conductors embedded in materials whose properties are to be measured. Figure 2(b)
shows a schematic plot of typical TDR signal. Information commonly obtained on
materials electrical properties include the apparent dielectric constant Ka, which are
related to the speed of electromagnetic wave in the material; and the electrical
conductivity ECb, which is related to the energy attenuation. Both quantities can be
easily obtained from a TDR signal. A brief introduction on determining these
quantities are summarized below: the travel velocity, v, of an electromagnetic wave
through media is calculated as follows:
c
v=
(3)
Ka
where c is the velocity of an electromagnetic wave in free space (2.988108m/s) and
Ka is the dielectric constant (for TDR measurement in soils, this quantity is generally
called apparent dielectric constant). The time for the electromagnetic wave traveling
down and back along a metallic waveguide of length, L, is given by:
2L
t=
(4)
v
Substituting equation (4) to (3) yields
ct
Ka =
2L
ASCE
(5)
By defining
128
ct
as apparent length la, the apparent dielectric constant can be
2
calculated as
2
l
(6)
Ka = a
L
In the TDR signal, the apparent length is determined from analyzing the time
elapse between reflections. The determination of the apparent length la is illustrated in
Figure 2(b). The electrical conductivity of bulk soil sample can be simultaneously
obtained from the final signal level (Yu and Drnevich 2004).
Relationship between Dielectric Constant and Gravimetric Water Content
Water has dielectric constant of around 81, which is much larger than that of soil
solids (typically around 3 to 7) or air (around 1). A variety of relationships has been
developed between TDR measured dielectric constant and volumetric water content.
Siddiqui and Drnevich (1995) 12 developed an equation that relate the TDR measured
dielectric constant to the gravimetric water content. The equation accounts for the
effects of soil type and density by incorporating two calibration constants. This
equation is shown below.
1
w = w K a a
b d
(7)
1.25
L
Ka = a
L
p
0.75
EC b =
Apparent Length, L a
1
C
Vs
1
V
0.25
0.25
Vs/2
0.75
1.25
0
ASCE
EXPERIMENT DESIGN
Experiments were designed to establish the effects of freezing on the strength of
concrete. Three representative types of concrete used in Ohio DOT projects were
used in the experiment. Concrete were obtained from commercial suppliers THE
COLLINWOODHORNING CONCRETE COMPANY (http://www.collinwoodhorning.com). The concrete mixes are designated as ODOT Class C (Ordinary
pavement concrete of 4000 psi), High Strength (8000 psi) and Selfconsolidating
concrete (6000 psi). A list of concrete properties is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Concrete Mixes Used in the Experimental Program
ODOT Class
High strength Selfconsolidating
C
Designed 28day strength
4000
8000
6000
(psi)
Slump (inch)
4
6
6
Designed Watercement
0.53
0.26
0.31
ratio
Accrual wc ratio
0.648
0.552
0.33
Sand (lb)
1380
1140
1438
#57 Limestone
Gravel(lb)
1480
1660
738
#8 Limestone 783
Cement(lb)
Type 15 650 Type 23 665
648
AE260 7
Duraflux33 (SCC
Admixture(oz)
AE260 4
3500N 32
Admixture) 10
Super 84
Water(lb)
76
102
240
Concrete specimens were prepared to determine the mechanical strength at
different curing ages. Sufficient numbers of specimens were prepared to ensure at
least three repetitive tests can be conducted for each test. All of these samples were
kept in the curing room before they were subjected to different freezing processes. In
TDR test, seven specimens were monitored in each group of experiment; each
subjected to different curing process. Among these, there were four different freezing
process produced by placing the specimen into temperature controlled freezer at 1st,
2nd, 4th, and 6th day of curing. The remaining three specimens are cured under
normal curing conditions but with different types of TDR probe design, including a
parallel strip design, a fourspike probe design and an insulated fourspike probe
design. TDR sensor monitors the electrical conductivity (ECb) and dielectric constant
(Ka) of concrete specimens subjected to different curing processes. For each of these
seven specimens, thermal couples were used to monitor the temperature process
(Figure 3b). The channel assignments are shown in Table 2.
ASCE
129
130
distribution
Table 2. Distribution of Monitoring Channels
TDR
Channel
No.
1
5
3
4
6
7
8
Sample
When was it
frozen
Parallel
Parallel
Parallel
Parallel
Parallel
Uninsulated
spikes
Insulated spikes
4inch
4inch
4inch
4inch
4inch
1st day
2nd day
w/o
4th day
6th day
5
2
3
4
6
6inch
w/o
6inch
w/o
8
1 (Environment
Temp)
The ultrasonic system includes a high power pulse generator, 1MHz ultrasonic
transducers, and a PCosciloscope (Fig. 4). The high characteristic frequency
ultrasonic transducer ensures a high resolution in determining the ultrasonic wave
speed. They are coupled to the concrete specimens via water.
ASCE
compressive strength, ultrasonic wave speed and water content of each type of
concrete (destructive oven dry method). The details of experiment plan are shown in
Table 3. The mechanical and physical properties of virgin samples were tested every
day from the beginning to the 7th day and then at 28th day. For the specimens
subjected to freezing, the strength and water content at 3rd day, 7th day, and 28th day
are measured. The frozen specimens were first defrosted before being tested.
Table 3. Physical Properties Test Schedule of Different Type of Concrete
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
28
Virgin
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
st
1 frozen
*
*
*
2nd frozen
*
*
*
th
4 frozen
*
*
*
th
6 frozen
*
*
*
EXPERIMENT DATA ANALYSIS
Ultrasonic velocity  strength relationship for concrete with normal curing
procedures
Figure 5 plots the strength of concrete versus ultrasonic wave velocity for
concrete subjected to normal curing conditions. As seen from this plot, there are
reasonably linear relationships between both terms. This confirms the observations in
many existing literatures. Such relationship can be used to estimate the compressive
strength of concrete from ultrasonic measurements.
131
ASCE
132
FIG. 10. Water content and strength increment development with time
FIG. 11. Linear relationship between water content and the strength increment
With the use of relationship such as shown in Fig. 11, an estimation of the
strength of frozen concrete from seismic test can be performed in the following
sequences:
1) Defreeze the concrete
2) Estimate the strength of thaw concrete from ultrasonic test (using relationship
shown in Fig. 6)
3) Use free water content to determine the differences in the strength of concrete
between complete frozen and complete thaw status (using relationship shown
in Fig. 11)
ASCE
133
4) Estimate the strength of frozen concrete by adding strength from steps 2) and
3).
A final issue to implement such a procedure is the estimation of the free water
content in concrete. This can be achieved by use of NDT technology such as Time
Domain Reflectometry (TDR). Previous research by the author shows TDR can be
used to reliably estimate the free water content in curing concrete (15). The
combination of ultrasonic testing and TDR testing thus provides a way to estimate the
strength of frozen concrete in the field. This information can be valuable for
pavement openroad decisions in cold regions, where the Winter Load Increases is
used to improve freight efficiency. The measured strength of frozen concrete can be
incorporated to determine the magnitude of overload that can be allowed on
pavements.
CONCLUSION
The relationship between seismic wave velocity and strength is the basis for
application of many NDT technologies based on seismic wave principles. Our
experimental data shows while there exist good linear relationships between the
compressive strength and the ultrasonic velocity, such relationship does not hold
when the concrete is frozen. The strength of frozen concrete does not have direct
correlations with ultrasonic wave velocity. The strength of frozen concrete, however,
can be estimated from that of thaw concrete and a correction related to the amount of
ice (free water). Combination of ultrasonic method and method for water content
measurement (such as TDR) provides a nondestructive method to estimate the
strength of curing concrete subjected to freezing procedures. This can potentially be
used for implement Winter Load Increases in cold regions. More studies are needed
to further validate and improve this technology.
REFERENCES
Boumiz, A., Vernet, C. and Tenoudji, F.C., "Mechanical properties of cement pastes
and mortars at early ages, evolution with time and degree of hydration." Advanced
Cement Based Materials 3 (3/4) (1996) 94106.
Boutin, C. and Amaud, L., "Mechanical characterization of heterogeneous materials
during setting." European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids 14 (4) (1995) 633656.
D'Angelo, R., Plona, T.J., Schwartz, L.M. and Coveney, P., "Ultrasonic
measurements on hydrating cement slurries." Advanced Cement Based Materials
2 (l) (1995) 814.
Drnevich, V.P., Siddiqui, S.I., Lovell, J., and Yi, Q. (2001). "Water Content And
Density Of Soil Insitu by the Purdue TDR Method." TDR 2001: Innovative
Applications of TDR Technology, Infrastructure Technology Institute,
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, September.
Keating, J., Hannant, O.J. and Hibbert, A.P., "Correlation between cube strength,
Ultrasonic pulse velocity and volume change for oil well cement slurries."
Cement and Concrete Research 19 (5) (1989) 715726.
Klute et al, 1986. "Method of Soil Analysis: Physical and Mineralogical Methods."
NO.9, Part 1. 2nd Edition.
ASCE
134
Pessiki, S.P. and Carino, N.J., "Setting time and strength of concrete using the
impactecho method." ACI Materials Journal85 (5) (1988) 389399.
Minnesota Department of Transportation, 1996. Frost Resistivity Probe. User Guide
Reinhardt, H.W., Grobe, C. and Herb, A., "Ultrasonic monitoring of setting and
hardening of cement mortar  a new device." Mater.Struet. 33 (233) (2000) 580583.
Roberson R. L. and Siekmeier, J., 2000. "Determining Frost Depth in Pavement
System Using a MultSegment Time Domain Reflectometry Probe." TRB Session
Sayers, C.M. and Grenfell, R.L., "Ultrasonic propagation through hydrating cements:
onset of shear wave propagation." Ultrasonics 31 (3)(1993) 147153.
Siddiqui, S.I., and Drnevich, V.P., (1995). "A New Method of Measuring Density and
Moisture Content of Soil Using the Technique of Time Domain Reflectometry."
Report No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP95/9, Joint Transportation Research Program,
Indiana Department of Transportation  Purdue University, February, 271 p.
Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P. (1980), "Electromagnetic Determination
of Soil Water Content and Electrical Conductivity Measurement Using Time
Domain Reflectometry." Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, pp. 574582.
Yu, X. and Drnevich, V.P. 2004. "Soil Water Content and Dry Density by Time
Domain Reflectometry." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No.9, September, pp 922934.
Yu, X., Drnevich, V. P. and Olek J., 2004, "Time Domain Reflectometry for
Measuring WaterCementRatio of Concrete." the Proceedings of the 2004
International Symposium: Advances in Concrete through Science and
Engineering, Evanston, Illinois, March 2124, 2004
ASCE
135
136
Graduate Student, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment,
Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email:
815633498@qq.com
2
Graduate Student, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment,
Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email:
296175834@qq.com
3
Associate Professor, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dept. of
Engineering Mechanics, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Email: zhaoh@dlut.edu.cn
Abstract: The pilesoilcap interaction model was established based on the threedimensional fast Lagrangian analysis software Flac3D. The concrete pile under lateral
loads with different sizes of cap and different lengths are investigated through numerical
simulations. Then the curves of lateral resistance of lateral soils surrounding the pile
with lateral displacement (py curves) was calculated and the influences of pile caps on
py curves were analyzed. The results show that the cap will affect the location of the
maximum soil resistance for the single pile, and if the critical load is reached, the
maximum soil resistance will increase with the sizes of cap. The influences of the cap to
the soil are mainly within the first quarter of the pile body. This paper also discussed the
influences of cap on the soil resistance with different pile lengths. These conclusions
provide the basis for the design of the pilesoilcap system at the condition of lateral
loads.
INTRODUCTION
Laterallyloaded piles are widely used in ocean engineering, harbor engineering,
bridge engineering and landslide preventions etc. We commonly use linear elastic
subgrade reaction method to solve the lateral displacement when the pile deflection is
small. But considering the pile with pile cap, it allows larger displacement to happen, the
elasticplastic analysis is used generally, also known as the elasticplastic subgrade
reaction method. The py curve method is the most widely used in the practice, and is
ASCE
ASCE
137
138
Density(kg/m3)
Elasticity Modulus(MPa)
Poisson Ratio
Cohesion (kPa)
Internal Friction Angle
Clay
1770
45.0
0.30
16
7.7
32m
2.5m
clay
20m
interface
10m
16m
pile
1m
ASCE
FIG. 2. Py curves at different depth of the 10m pile with cap sizes in
(a) no cap; (b) small cap; (c) medium cap; (d) large cap
According to the Figure 2, we can see that the value of the soil reaction force on the
pile body sharply decreases with the soil depth. We would find that every curve has an
deflection point, at which the soil lateral displacement is zero, and then below would
have small soil reaction force in the opposite direction. Another obvious change is the
force at the pile bottom which gradually decreases with the increase of cap sizes. The
existence of the pile caps can change the point of the maximum soil reaction force under
the critical load. With no cap, the maximum soil resistance is at about a quarter along the
pile length, and the existence of the pile caps will make the maximum soil resistance
acting at the pile head. After adding the pile cap, the soil reaction force produced by the
lateral loads is mainly beard by the caps, and with the increase of cap size, the pile cap
bears more percentage of the total lateral loads. The soil resistances at the pile cap for
piles with three different caps are 4.55 times, 5.32 times, 7.19 times of those at the
embedded depth of 2m, respectively.
ASCE
139
140
FIG. 3. The p  y curve of pile head at critical load with different cap sizes
Figure 3 shows the lateral soil resistance of the pile with different size of caps under
the critical load. From no cap to large cap the maximum soil resistance:78.6 kPa341
kPa, 479 kPa, and 719 kPa. The cap will significantly increase the lateral loads bearing
capacity of the pile. Based on these results, the commonly used method of calculating
the py curve will give the displacement greater than the real displacement for those with
caps. The design will be rather conservative. The ratio of the largest soil resistance of
three types of caps is 1:1.4:2.1 and the caps sizes ratio is 1:1.7:2.7. Presumably, when
reaching the critical load, the soil resistance is directly proportional to the size of pile
caps, but the efficiency of bearing the loads would decay with the increasing the cap
sizes.
ASCE
FIG. 5. The pile head py curves of different pile length(6m, 10m, 15m):
(a) no cap; (b) small cap; (c) medium cap; (d) large cap
Based on the data from the numerical simulation, when the pile length is 6m, the soil
lateral resistance value at the pile head would 78 kPa, 310 kPa, 531 kPa, and 944kPa for
four types of pile caps. When the pile length is 10m, the resistance is 78.9 kPa, 341 kPa,
479 kPa, and 719 kPa, respectively. When the pile length is 15m, the resistance is 91.2
kPa,335 kPa, 452 kPa, and 650 kPa respectively. Through analyzing the data, with
the increase of pile length, pile head soil resistance increases for the pile has no cap; For
the pile with small cap, with the increase of pile length, pilehead soil resistance increases
first then decreases; and for the pile with medium or large cap, the pile head soil
resistance decreases with the increase of pile length. These indicate the gradual changing
influences of pile cap size on the pile head soil resistance. To sum up, under the
condition of the pile cap, the shorter the single pile, the larger the soil resistance at pile
head when reaching the critical load, and the greater the pile could bear the lateral loads.
ASCE
141
CONCLUSIONS
For the concrete piles in clay, we analyzed the influences of caps on the py curves
under lateral loads with the numerical analysis based on Flac3D. The following
conclusions can be drawn:
For the single pile with no cap under lateral loads, the maximum soil resistance of
pile side will appear at the quarter of the pile depth. Most of the lateral soil
resistance would be borne by the pile caps. Another influence is the resistance
force at the pile bottom gradually decreases with the increase of cap sizes.
When the applied lateral load reaching the critical load, the existence of the pile
caps only has a significant influence on the soil resistance with the first quarter
length of the pile. For the other part of soil along the pile length, it has little
influence on the soil resistance.
The commonly used py curve calculation method will give the displacement
greater than the real displacement for that with caps. The design will be rather
conservative.
With the increases of pile length, soil resistance at the pile head will change
because of the presence of pile caps and different cap sizes. With the increase of
pile length, pile head soil resistance increases when the pile has no cap. Under the
condition of the pile cap, the shorter the single pile, the larger the soil resistance at
pile head when reaching the critical load, and the greater the pile could bear the
lateral loads.
.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
51308091), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
(DUT15QY48).
REFERENCES
China Academy of Building Research (2008). Pile foundations JGJ942008 specification. Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
Emilios, M., Comodromos, Mello, C., and Papadopoulou (2013). Explicit extension of
the py method to pile groups in cohesive soils. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol.
47: 2841.
Fatahi, B., Basack, S., Ryan, P., Zhou, W.H., and Khbbaz, H. (2014). Performance of
laterally loaded piles considering soil and interface parameters. Geomechanics and
Engineering, Vol. 7(5):495524.
Hong, Y., Xie, Y., Zhang, S., and Yan, J. (2007). Horizontally loaded piles finite
element simulation with an analysis of py curve method. China Harbour
Engineering, Vol. 3:59.
ASCE
142
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fakher, A., and Fatahi, B. (2012). Full scale lateral behaviour of
monopoles in granular marine soils. Marine Structures, Vol. 29(1):198210.
Kim, J.B., Brungraber, R.J., and Singh, L.P. ( 1979). Pile cap soil interaction from fullscale lateral load tests. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.
105(5): 643653.
Matlock, H.S. (1970). Correlation for design of laterally loaded pile in soft clay.
Proceedings of 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, Houston:[s.n.].
Nath, U.K., and Hazarika, P.J. (2013). Lateral resistance of pile capan experimental
investigation. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 7(3):266272.
Pile foundation manual writing committee (2009). Pile and Pile Foundation Handbook. Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
Qi, C., Wang, J., and Li, S. (2009). A research about the influence of pile diameter to
the pilesoil interaction py curve. Journal of Water Resources and Hydropower
Technology, Vol. 40 (3):4346.
Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R., and Koop, F.D. (1975). Field testing and analysis of laterally
loaded piles in stiff clay. Proceedings of 7th Offshore Technology Conference,
Houston: [s.n.].
Rollins, M.K., and Sparks, A. (2002). Lateral resistance of fullscale pile cap with
gravel backfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.
128(9): 711723.
Tian, P., and Wang, C. (1993). A unified method about py curve of transverse periodic
loaded piles. Journal of Hehai university, Vol. 21(1):914.
Wang, C., Wu D.,and Tian, P. (1991). A new unified method about py curve of lateral
static loaded piles in clay. Journal of Hehai University, Vol. 12 (1) : 9 17.
Wang, C., and Sun, D. (2005). Laterally loaded piles py curve research and
application. China Harbour Engineering, Vol. 2:135138.
Wang, X., Feng, H., and Li, P. (2011). Soil resistance distribution research of rigid pile
with the lateral load. Highway Traffic Science and Technology, Vol. 7, 212215.
Yang, G., and Zhang, Z. (2002). The research of py curve about laterally static loaded
piles on the condition of large deflection. Water Transportation Engineering, Vol.
7: 4045.
Yang, K. (2004). Practical pile foundation engineering. Beijing: People's Traffic
Press.
Zhang, S. (2001). The research of py curve about horizontally static loaded piles.
NanJing: Hehai university.
ASCE
143
144
Instructor, Dept. of Geoscience, Univ. of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4,
Canada. Email: brandon.karchewski@ucalgary.ca
2
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7,
Canada. Email: guop@mcmaster.ca
3
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L7,
Canada. Email: stolle@mcmaster.ca
ASCE
The present work uses a form of combined finite elementdiscrete element (FEMDEM) model (cf. Munjiza 2004) to capture multiscale behaviour in granular
materials. The model uses Voronoi cell elements to represent the grains; hence, we
call the model VCFEMDEM. We model the interactions between grains using
interface elements with a volumetricdeviatoric hardening plasticity formulation to
account for the nonlinear constitutive behaviour of grain interactions. We direct the
reader to the work of Goodman et al. (1968), Pietruszczak and Mrz (1981), Wang et
al. (2003), Selvadurai and Yu (2005) and the references therein for details on
modelling interfaces in geomaterials. In the following sections, we briefly summarize
the formulation and then demonstrate its performance by simulating strain localization
failure of granular material in a biaxial compression test.
FORMULATION
Governing Equations
We discretize the total domain V into a set of polygonal subdomains Ve representing
grains and interfaces Vi representing grain interactions. The discretized form of the
equation of motion is,
M
au + FI (t) = FE (t)
(1)
where M is the mass matrix for the discretized system, au is a vector of nodal
displacements, FI(t) is a vector of internal forces at time t, FE(t) is a vector of external
applied forces at time t and superposed dots represent derivatives with respect to time.
The internal force vector FI has a linear elastic component FI(g) from the grain
elements and a nonlinear component FI(i) from the interfaces between grains. We solve
equation (1) using an implicit CrankNicolson scheme. Next, we describe how we
form the element matrices and force vectors for the two types of element.
Hybrid Polygonal Element (Grain Element)
We assume the polygonal grain elements to be linear elastic and derive the stiffness
matrix from the modified complementary energy functional of Tong and Pian (1969).
We interpolate stress inside the grain elements as = P + 0 where P contains a
set of monomial basis functions and is a vector of unknown coefficients. The P
term represents the stress field component owing to grain deformation, interpolated to
satisfy equilibrium a priori and 0 represents a constant initial stress. Interpolation of
displacement u* on the element boundary Se is of the form u* = Nu*au where Nu*
contains linear shape functions interpolating between the adjacent nodal values of
displacement au. Substituting the stress and displacement interpolations into the
modified complementary energy functional gives the discretized form of the hybrid
functional,
(2)
MCE [ , au ] = 12 T H + T G uau aTu Ft0
where H = Ve (PTDe1P)dV, Gu = Se (nTP)TNu*dS, Ft = St (Nu*Tt )dS,
F0 = Se Nu*T(nT0)dS and Ft 0 = Ft F0. In these expressions, De1 represents the elastic
compliance tensor, n represents the outward pointing unit normal and t is an applied
traction on St. Stationarity of equation (2) at equilibrium requires that the variations
with respect to and au vanish, and noting that the coefficients need not be
continuous between elements leads to = H1Guau where Tong and Pian (1969)
ASCE
145
146
present the requirements for rank sufficiency and invertibility of H. This substitution
leads to the element stiffness matrix for the polygonal grain elements as
Kuu(g) = GuTH1Gu and the component of internal force FI(t) owing to body element
deformation FI(g)(t) = Kuu(g)au(t). Pian and Wu (2006) provide a more detailed
literature review on the origin, formulation and application of hybrid finite elements
and Ghosh (2011) discusses further details regarding polygonal elements.
We compute the consistent mass matrix M for the grain elements using the wellknown relation M = Ve (NuTNu)dV where Nu is a matrix containing shape functions
that interpolate between nodal values of displacement inside the polygonal element
domain Ve (cf. Sukumar and Tabarraei 2004) and is the material density. We
perform mass lumping for computational efficiency, with the understanding that this
may introduce a small amount of numerical damping into the solution.
Interface Element (Grain Interaction Element)
We define the constitutive behaviour of the interface element using a combined
volumetricdeviatoric hardening elastoplastic formulation (cf. Pietruszczak 2010). We
base the interface element formulation on an incremental strain energy relation,
U i [ , ] = ( T ) dV + 12 ( T ) dV
Vi
Vi
(3)
(4)
ASCE
147
critical state approach (Muir Wood 1990), where is the hardening parameter. Active
loading satisfies the consistency condition and at failure, the interface stresses satisfy
the MohrCoulomb yield criterion. We do not present the details of the plasticity
formulation here, but this formulation leads to the definition of the internal force
vector FI(i) = Ve (BT)dV and tangent stiffness matrix Kuu(i) = Ve (BTDepB)dV for an
interface element where Dep depends on the hardening coefficient H = He + Hp where
He = (f/)TDe(f/) and Hp = (f/){ (f/) (1 + e0) (f/) }. Note that e0
is the void ratio of the interface and is a parameter specifying the component of the
increment to the hardening parameter owing to plastic shear strain increments, which
depends on the friction angles at failure and critical state f and c, respectively,
tan f tan c
= (1 + e0 )
tan c tan f
1
2
(5)
ASCE
ASCE
148
149
60
phi_001
phi_002
phi_003
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0E+00
1.0E05
2.0E05
3.0E05
4.0E05
2000
1500
1000
nplas
nperplas
ntens
500
0
0.0E+00
1.0E05
2.0E05
3.0E05
4.0E05
FIG. 3. Number of plastic and failed interface elements during strain controlled
shearing. nplas = # of plastic elements (active loading, but not failed), nperplas =
# of elements failed in shear, ntens = # of elements failed in extension.
for aggregation of socalled c contacts in the formation of shear bands.
Having briefly demonstrated that the VCFEMDEM framework captures the
fundamental phenomena defining shear failure of a granular material, we close by
examining deformation modes obtained from tangent eigenanalysis of the granular
structure at the end of the consolidation phase. FIG. 4 demonstrates two main types of
deformation modes: global modes resulting from the granular structure deforming in
unison and local modes represent deformations owing to relative grain movement and
rotation. The regions of high grain rotation divide the specimen into subregions,
whose size represents a characteristic length scale for the material test, as shown in the
two failure modes in FIG. 4(b). For the specimen shown, the characteristic length is
approximately one third to half of the specimen height. Note that the mode shapes and
their corresponding eigenvalues change throughout the test, owing to the stress
dependency of the interface element stiffness. However, this set of deformation modes
already shows patterns similar to the ultimate shear band failure mode. This is
consistent with observations in recent studies that there exists an entire bifurcation domain
ASCE
150
~6.0 cm
~7.5 cm
~19
~47
ASCE
ASCE
151
152
Ph.D. Candidate (M.Eng., B.Eng.), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology
Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. Email: Lam.D.Nguyen@student.uts.edu.au
2
Senior Lecturer, Geotechnical Engineering (Ph.D., CP.Eng.), School of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. Email: Behzad.Fatahi@uts.edu.au
3
Associate Professor, Geotechnical Engineering (Ph.D.), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. Email: Hadi.Khabbaz@uts.edu.au
Abstract: Soft clay treated with cement shows an improvement on strength due to the
chemical interaction between cement and clay particles. Laboratory results showed that
the peak strength of the cement treated clay reduces as the mean effective stress
increases due to the effect of cementation degradation. Therefore, in this paper, a
constitutive model was developed to simulate the behaviour of cement treated clay.
Based on the Critical State Soil Mechanics, the model proposed the nonlinear failure
envelope for the cement treated clay to merge with the Critical State Line (CSL) of the
unreinforced clay when the reinforced samples reach a sufficiently high stress levels.
Moreover, a modified mean effective stress was proposed to include the contribution of
cementation and its cementation degradation. Furthermore, the proposed model was
evaluated by comparing the proposed model predictions against the Singapore clay
treated with 10% cement available from the literature. The validation suggested that the
proposed model can be used to predict the behaviour of cement treated clay very well.
INTRODUCTION
Stabilising soft soil with cement has become an effective ground improvement
technique to improve the properties of the soft soil, such as improvements in strength
and compressibility, while the ductility of the cement treated clay can be improved by
the inclusion of other additives, e.g. fibre (Fatahi et al., 2013a; Fatahi et al., 2013b).
Researchers such as Chew et al. (2004) and Lorenzo et al. (2006) have conducted
numerous studies to investigate the effect of cementation on the behaviour of cement
treated clay. Particularly, the shear strength is improved significantly by mixing cement
with soft clay. However, as the mean effective yield stress increases beyond the initial
yield stress, the breakage of cementation bonds occur which reduces the effectiveness of
cementation, consequently affecting the shear strength of the cement treated clay
ASCE
153
(Kamruzzaman et al., 2009). Several constitutive models were developed to simulate the
behaviour of cement treated clay, e.g. the Structured Cam Clay (SCC) model developed
by Horpibulsuk et al. (2010). However, the existing constitutive models assumed linear
failure envelope in plane while the peak shear strength of the cement treated clay
reduces due to the effect of cementation degradation, particularly at high effective
confining pressures (Panda et al., 1998; and Uddin et al., 1997). Hence in this paper,
based on the framework of Critical State Soil Mechanics, a constitutive model was
proposed, considering the effect of cementation degradation under various loading
conditions. Moreover, the mean effective stress was modified to consider the beneficial
effect of cementation and its degradation. The validation of the proposed model includes
comparing the model predictions with the results on Singapore marine clay treated with
10% cement available from the literature.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED MODEL
The process of cementation includes hydration process, ion exchange and pozzolanic
reactions (Porbaha et al., 2000). The primary chemical interaction (hydration and ion
exchange process) creates cementation bonding between clay particles and cement
which forms large clay clusters within the soilcement matrix. Further bonding results
from a secondary pozzolanic reactions which increases the cohesion in the mixture,
consequently leading to a strongly bonded structure (Lorenzo et al., 2004). Since the
cementation process continues over a prolonged period, time dependent behaviour of
soil should be considered as suggested by Le et al. (2015). However, for simplicity, the
main focus of this study is to examine the behaviour of cement treated clay in undrained
condition which occurs relatively over a short time period. Laboratory results showed
that the initial yield stress of the cement treated clay increases significantly due to the
effect of cementation (Horpibulsuk et al., 2010). However, as the mean effective yield
stress increases beyond the initial yield stress during isotropic consolidation, breaking of
cementation bonds occurs causing plastic deformation. At high mean effective yield
stress, significant reduction in void ratio was observed as large clay clusters collapse and
the effect of cementation gradually diminishes (Kamruzzaman et al., 2009). Hence, the
effect of cementation and its degradation are mainly related to the mean effective stress
( ). Thus, in this proposed model, inspired by Nguyen et al. (2014), the mean effective
stress was modified to consider the beneficial contribution of cementation and the effect
of cementation degradation at sufficiently high mean effective stress as follows:
1+
(1)
ASCE
154
the mean effective yield stress and , is the initial mean effective yield stress. It should
be noted that, was formulated in a way that when
, , the effect of
0 , hence .
cementation significantly reduces and gradually vanishes
Furthermore, when the cement treated clay is stressed up to the initial mean effective
stress
, , it is assumed that there is no effect of cementation degradation, so the
contribution of cementation is the most effective in this range, thus = + .
In this study, the proposed yield function follows the Modified Cam Clay (MCC)
model, which assumed that the cement treated clay is an isotropic material. So, when the
cement treated clay is within the yield surface, only elastic deformation occurs. Hence,
adopting Hookes Law and the modified mean effective stress (Eq.1) the elastic
deformation of the cement treated clay can be described by the following equations:
(2)
,
,
(
(
)
)(
(3)
,
,
and
are the elastic volumetric strain increment and elastic deviatoric strain
where
increment, respectively. Moreover, is the slope of the swelling line, is the void ratio
of the cement treated clay and is the Poissons ratio.
Furthermore, to follow the basis of MCC model, the yield surface in
be formulated in the following equation:
,
=
where
plane.
1+
plane can
=0
= +
, describes the size of the yield surface when
is the effective confining pressure prior to the shearing stage..
(4)
= 0 in
When the cement treated clay is on the yield surface, plastic deformation occurs.
Hence, it is important to describe the plastic flow rule for the appropriate direction of the
plastic strain vectors. In this study, the nonassociated plastic flow rule was proposed to
consider the effect of cementation as follows:
=
ASCE
(5)
155
where
and
are the plastic volumetric strain increment and the plastic deviatoric
strain increment, respectively. The parameter is used for balancing the deviatoric and
volumetric strain increments. Moreover, the term is derived from taking the derivative
of with respect to as follows:
,
,
=1
(6)
Moreover, the nonassociated plastic potential function can be derived using the plastic
flow rule (Eq.5) in the following form:
=
(1 + 2 ) +
=0
(7)
ASCE
+( )
+
(
(
(
)
)(
(8)
(9)
156
C = 120 kPa
C = 80 kPa
200
C = 40 kPa
180
C = 0 kPa
160
Critical State Line
( = )
M = 0.9
= 55 kPa
= 80 kPa
= 200 kPa
= 0.6
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
80
30
20
70
120
170
220
Singapore clay
0.73
0.067
2.85
0.1
(kPa)
0.9
158
(kPa)
2500
Fig. 2 shows the triaxial test results and the model predictions on 10% cement treated
Singapore clay at 300, 500 and 1000 kPa of effective confining pressure. Since all the
triaxial tests adopted the effective confining pressure was higher than the initial mean
effective yield stress , of Singapore clay ( , = 300 kPa), so the stress state of all
samples were on the current yield surface. When shearing stage commenced, the stress
paths rose upward and bent to the left in
plane as excess pore water pressure
developed within the sample, as shown in Fig. 2(a). Moreover, all samples reached the
peak shear strength above the CSL of the reconstituted soilcement mixture, showing the
ASCE
157
contribution of cementation to the shear strength. The predictions from the proposed
model were in good agreement with the experimental results in
plane adopting
the general stressstrain relationship proposed in Eqs. (8) and (9). Furthermore, the
as shown in Fig. 2(b) for the cement
strength increased with deviatoric strain
treated Singapore clay. The peak shear strength was observed to occur at
= 2.2% for
the treated Singapore clay. There are some disparities in predicting the stressstrain
relationship for the cement treated Singapore clay at small strain, particularly for sample
tested at effective confining pressure of 300 kPa. However, when the deviatoric strain
exceeds 0.5%, the proposed model simulated the strength development with increasing
strain very well. Overall, the behaviour of the cement treated clay was captured by
considering the effect of cementation and its degradation in the proposed model.
900
900
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
800
0
0
200
= 1000 kPa
700
600
500
400
= 500 kPa
300
200
= 300 kPa
100
= 1000 kPa
= 300 kPa
800
= 500 kPa
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
0
0.5
1.5
Deviatoric strain
(b)
(%)
FIG. 2. Behaviour of Singapore clay treated with 10% cement in: (a) stress path
( plane) and (b) stress strain relationship ( plane). The triaxial results
were obtained from Kamruzzaman et al. (2009).
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the proposed model has captured the important features of the behaviour
of cement treated clay, particularly the effect of cementation and its degradation to the
shear strength. Special characteristics of the proposed model include the modified mean
effective stress and nonassociated plastic potential function, together with the general
stressstrain relationship. Moreover, the performance of the proposed model was
evaluated by predicting the reported results on treated Singapore clay very well. Overall,
this model can be adopted in geotechnical design for treating soft clay with cement.
ASCE
REFERENCES
Chew, S. H., Kamruzzaman, A. H. and Lee, F. H. (2004). "Physicochemical and
engineering behavior of cement treated clays" Journal of geotechnical and
geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 130 (7): 696706.
Fatahi, B., Fatahi, B., Le, T. M. and Khabbaz, H. (2013a). "Smallstrain properties of
soft clay treated with fibre and cement" Geosynthetics International, Vol. 20 (4): 286300.
Fatahi, B., Le, T., Fatahi, B. and Khabbaz, H. (2013b). "Shrinkage Properties of Soft
Clay Treated with Cement and Geofibers" Geotechnical and Geological Engineering:
an international journal, Vol. 31 (5): 14211435.
Horpibulsuk, S., Liu, M. D., Liyanapathirana, D. S. and Suebsuk, J. (2010). "Behaviour
of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of the structured cam clay
model" Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 37 (1): 19.
Kamruzzaman, A. H., Chew, S. H. and Lee, F. H. (2009). "Structuration and
Destructuration Behavior of CementTreated Singapore Marine Clay" Journal of
geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 135 (4): 573589.
Le, T. M., Fatahi, B. and Khabbaz, H. (2015). "Numerical optimisation to obtain elastic
viscoplastic model parameters for soft clay" International Journal of Plasticity, Vol.
65: 121.
Lorenzo, G. A. and Bergado, D. T. (2004). "Fundamental parameters of cementadmixed
claynew approach" Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol.
130 (10): 10421050.
Lorenzo, G. A. and Bergado, D. T. (2006). "Fundamental characteristics of cementadmixed clay in deep mixing" Journal of materials in civil engineering, Vol. 18 (2):
161174.
Nguyen, L. D., Fatahi, B. and Khabbaz, H. (2014). "A constitutive model for cemented
clays capturing cementation degradation" International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 56:
118.
Panda, A. P. and Rao, S. N. (1998). "Undrained strength characteristics of an artificially
cemented marine clay" Marine georesources & geotechnology, Vol. 16 (4): 335353.
Porbaha, A., Shibuya, S. and Kishida, T. (2000). "State of the art in deep mixing
technology. Part III: Geomaterial characterization" Proceedings of the ICEGround
Improvement, Vol. 4 (3): 91110.
Uddin, K., Balasubramaniam, A. S. and Bergado, D. T. (1997). "Engineering behavior
of cementtreated Bangkok soft clay" Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 28 (1): 89119.
ASCE
158
159
ASCE
A number of construction projects in the state of Ohio, USA had experienced significant
sulfate induced heaving in cement stabilized soils (Narsavage 2011; Cutright and Wigdahl
2013). Approximately 0.5~4 inches of heaving was observed at the longitudinal joint
between the center median barrier wall and shoulder pavement at numerous locations. The
pavement consisted of 11.5 inches of asphalt concrete overlaid on 6 inches of aggregate
base on top of 12 inches of cementstabilized subgrade. An experimental study of soils
from these construction projects in Ohio revealed the presence of gypsum and other
sulfate bearing minerals but did not show adequate correlation between sulfate content
and swelling (Weir et al. 2014).
Attributing soil heave entirely to ettringite formation is likely a simplistic
misconception of a very complex process that may involve multiple mechanisms. Early
efforts by Abdi and Wild (1993) and Wild et al. (1993) suggested that the primary
mechanism in sulfatecontaining lime stabilized clays might be imbibition of water by
osmosis, rather than direct formation of solid reaction products. Nair and Little (2011)
showed that swelling was most likely caused by a synergy of multiple mechanisms,
including formation of ettringite, water absorption of formed ettringite and osmosis
induced swelling of clay minerals. Numerical investigations of the interplay of multiple
mechanisms were previously examined in a chemomechanical constitutive framework by
Sigdel and Hu (2015) that shows that ettringite formation and osmosis swelling may play
comparable roles in the heaving process. On the other hand, understanding of the inner
mechanisms of the ettringite formation and the induced volume expansion remains much
needed in order to better understand the precise path of the swelling strain development
and identify specific dominant mechanism under particular environmental conditions.
In the present paper the crystallization pressure in ettringite formation and its role in the
soil swelling are investigated. Key concepts and mechanisms involved are discussed with
an aim to establish mathematical formulations for numerical modelling in a
chemomechanical framework to address the characteristics and role of crystallization
pressure. The kinetics of the involved chemical reactions are examined and subsequently
simulated for the timedependent process of crystal growth and crystallization pressure
development. Numerical simulations of swelling strain are based on a previously
established micromechanical formulation (Bary 2008).
PHONEMONOLOGICAL BACKGROUND AND KEY CONCEPTS
Although the formation of ettringite is generally believed to contribute to the expansion of
sulfate bearing soils, neither the mechanism of the volume expansion during its formation
process nor its role in soil expansion is entirely clear.
One particular intriguing implication is related to the volume change in the possible
chemical reaction leading to the formation of ettringite, which is a hydrous calcium
aluminum sulfate mineral (Ca6[Al(OH)6]2(SO4)326 H2O). Comparing the original
volume of the involved reactants with that of the product (eq. (1)), Little et al. (2010)
showed that, if the volume of each of the reactants is considered, including the water
supplied from within the matrix, the volume change is actually negative, i.e.,
transformation of all reactants into ettringite causes approximately 5% shrinkage.
ASCE
160
161
(1)
ln
Q reac
reac
(2)
(3)
and are the stress and strain tensor. is the stiffness tensor, is the secondorder
identity tensor. is a macroscopic scalar interaction coefficient. Bary (2008) used the
ASCE
162
for
<1
(4)
(mol/s) is the rate of the growing gypsum crystals, negative indicating dissolution.
(mol/m2s) is the dissolution rate of gypsum.
(m2) is the surface area gypsum
crystals exposed to water action. The dissolution takes place if the concentration of
sulfate, (i.e., [SO ]), is lower than its saturated concentration
. For simplicity, in the
present study the surface area
is assumed as a constant. The kinetic rate for ettringite
precipitation is adopted also in a firstorder kinetic law used in Bary (2008) but expressed
in a different equation similar to eq. (4),
=
for
>1
(5)
The parameters including the rate constant, surface area and saturated concentration, are
defined in the same manner as those for gypsum dissolution. Obviously, precipitation of
gypsum and dissolution of ettringite can be also formulated similarly with their respective
rate constants. Simple treatment of prescribing a zero rate constant for these two reactions
is applied, for the sake of simplicity, in the following discussion on which a simple
scenario of gypsum dissolution and ettringite formation (precipitation) is focused, but it is
clear that inclusion of the other two reactions can be readily achieved by prescribing
nonzero rate constants.
The crystallization pressure based on eq. (2) is applied to the chemical reaction of
ettringite formation and we adopted the formulated suggested by Bary (2008),
=
ln
[Ca] [SO ]
[Ca] [SO ]
(6)
where [Ca] and [SO ] are the calcium and sulfate concentrations at chemical
equilibrium. A simplification is made by considering only the evolution of sulfate
ASCE
ASCE
163
FIG.. 3: (a) Ev
volution off expansion
n as affecteed by temp
perature; ((b) effect oof
temp
perature in the shortteerm and lon
ngterm devvelopment off expansive strain.
ASCE
164
ASCE
165
REFERENCES
Abdi, M. R. and Wild, S. (1993), Sulphate expansion of limestabilized kaolinite: I.
Physical characteristics. Clay Minerals, 28(4): 569584.
Bary, D. (2008). Simplified coupled chemomechanical modeling of cement pastes
behavior subjected to combined leaching and external sulfate attack. Int. J. Num.
Anal. Meth. Geomech., 32(14): 17911816.
Correns, C.W. (1949). Growth and dissolution of crystals under linear pressure, Discuss.
Faraday Soc., 5: 267 271.
Cutright, T. and Wigdahl, J. (2013), Assessment of sulfate bearing soils in Ohio. 2013
Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference, Columbus, OH.
Hu, L. B. and Sigdel, P. (2015). Exploring a chemomechanical Approach to understand
expansive behavior of sulfate bearing soils. ASCE Construction Institute Special
Publication on Innovative Materials and Design for Sustainable Transportation
Infrastructure, 189199.
Hunter, D. (1988), Limeinduced heave in sulfatebearing clay soils. J. Geotech. Eng.
114(2): 150167.
Little, D. N., Nair, S. and Herbert, B. (2010), Addressing sulfateinduced heave in lime
treated soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 136(1): 110118.
Mitchell, J. K. (1986), Practical problems from surprising soil behavior. J. Geotech.
Eng., 112(3): 255289.
Nair, S. and Little, D. (2011), Mechanisms of Distress Associated with SulfateInduced
Heaving in LimeTreated Soils. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res.
Board, 2212(1): 8290.
Narsavage, P. A. (2011). Sulfate heaving of cement stabilized soil in Ohio. 2011 Ohio
Transportation Engineering Conference, Columbus, OH.
Oldecop, L. and Alonso, E. (2012), Modelling the degradation and swelling of clayey
rocks bearing calciumsulphate. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 54: 90102.
Puppala, A. J., Intharasombat, N. and Vempati, R. K. (2005), Experimental studies on
ettringiteinduced heaving in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(3): 325337.
Scherer, G. W. (1999). Crystallization in pores. Cem. Concr. Res., 29(8): 13471358.
Scherer, G. W. (2004). Stress from crystallization of salt. Cem. Concr. Res., 34(9):
16131624.
Sigdel, P. and Hu, L. B. (2015). Modelling ettringite induced heaving in cement
stabilized soils within a chemomechanical constitutive framework. ASCE
Geotechnical Special Publication 256: IFCEE 2015, 125132.
Weir, M., Mandell, A. and Farver, J. (2014). Role of Sulfates on Highway Heave in Lake
County, Ohio. Report # FHWA/OH2014/4, Ohio Department of Transportation.
Wild, S., Abdi, M. R. and LengWard, G. (1993), Sulphate expansion of limestabilized
kaolinite: II. Reaction products and expansion, Clay Minerals, 28(4): 569584.
Xie, P. and Beaudoin, J. J. (1992.) Mechanism of sulphate expansion. I. Thermodynamic
principle of crystallization pressure. Cem. Concr. Res., 22(4): 631640.
ASCE
166
167
Analysis of the Effect of Stiffening at the Top of a Single Granular Pile with a StressDependent Deformation Modulus
K. S. Grover1 and J. K. Sharma2
1
Professor, Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Technical Univ., Kota 324010, India. Email:
kdsgrover@gmail.com
2
Professor, Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Technical Univ., Kota 324010, India. Email:
jksrtu@gmail.com
ASCE
irs
ASCE
168
169
Assume the ground is in submerged condition. Let s' = submerged unit weight of
GP and Hi = depth of the center of element i, from the ground level. K = coefficient of
lateral stress (It is between 1 and 2 as per Poorooshasb & Meyerhoff 1997), in case of
GP its value depends on the installation effects of GP and on the condition of
surrounding soft soil. In the present work, K is taken as 1.
Egps is the stressindependent deformation modulus of GP. Egps, is defined as
n
1 + 2K
E
= A '
,
(2)
gps
ivs 3
Where n= 0.4 to 1.0 and A is constant of proportionality.
In this work average value of n is taken as 0.5 (Lambe & Whitman 1969). Fig. 4
shows the granular pile with load P on its top. Due to the application of load, the
horizontal and axial stresses on the elements increase. The current vertical, ivt and
horizontal stresses, irt on element i, are (Fig. 5)
= ivs
+ iv
ivt
(3)
+ ir
irt = irs
where,
iv = axial stress increment on element i due to load P
ir = radial stress increment on element i due to load P
As the deformation modulus of GP at any depth depends on its axial and horizontal
stresses at that level, for an element i, the deformation modulus, Eigp, is expressed as
0.5
ivt + 2 irt
E
= A
(4)
igp
'
K
gps ivs(1+ 2K)
Where
ASCE
170
S
d
Es d 2
To calculate the relative GPsoil stiffness of all the elements consistent with their
axial and horizontal stresses, the iterative analysis is carried out until the required
convergence is obtained between the new and the old values of element stiffness, Kigp.
Results of GP are presented in terms of normalized loaddisplacement curves and
variations of normalized shear stresses with depth to study effect of stress dependent
deformation modulus.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Following are the ranges of parameters considered: Kgp = 10  500, L/d = 10 and 20,
s = 0.5 and gp = 0.3, *s =0.1, = 0.00001, coefficient of lateral stress K=1, is used
to define Ls i.e. stiffened length of GP where, Ls = x L/d. has been varied from 0.1
to 0.4. Top portion of length Ls of GP is made more stiffened by assuming different
Kgp in the top portion of GP. Kgp of the stiffened portion is Kgp and by taking =1 to
10 Kgp is varied up to 10 times of the lower portion.
An attempt has been made to obtain the variation of normalized load with depth for
different Kgp, and , to determine the variation of pile stiffness with depths by
changing Kgp, and , and to find out the distribution of the shear stresses with depth
along GPsoil interface with effect of Kgp, and , Grover and Sharma (2015).
The results of the present analysis are verified with the available results of the
previous researchers, Sharma and Madhav (1999). The values obtained are given in
the Table 1 for comparison. The results presented in Table 1 indicate that values are in
good agreement.
ASCE
Results of Sharma
and Madhav (1999)
Present
Analysis
Variable considered
L/d Kgp
10
50
320
320.006
10
50
1.5
1.4987
20
50
0.08
0.081
20
100
1.6
1.6045
10
50
1.44
1.445
20
50
0.390
0.3896
171
It may be observed that there is change in the values of normalized load with
normalized displacement in GP with stiffened top as shown in Fig. 6. For a constant ,
the values increase with displacement linearly. For a constant normalized
displacement of 0.01, the values of normalized load are 0.0485, 0.0578 and 0.0620 for
=2, =5 and =10 respectively. Thus, increase in values of normalized load with
increase in the value of is observed.
Fig.7 shows that there is a small change in the values of normalized load with
normalized displacement in GP with stiffened top for different value of Kgp. For a
constant Kgp, the values of normalized load increase with displacement. At a constant
normalized displacement of 0.01, the values of normalized load obtained are 0.0328,
0.0399, 0.0509, 0.0581, 0.0633 and 0.0671 at Kgp values of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 and
500 respectively i.e. at higher value of stiffness of GP, higher normalized load is
obtained.
Fig.8 shows the results for load displacement relation for Kgp=20, L/d=20 and =2
and different values when stress dependent modulus is considered in GP. With
increase in values of , the load values are increasing. The normalized load values for
=0.4 are the maximum at a given normalized displacement.
Fig.9 shows the normalized shear stress with normalized depth for L/d=20 and
Kgp=50 with 20% stiffened length. Comparing the values at a constant depth indicate
that the values of normalized shear stress are higher for unstiffened GP at very less
normalized depth of 0.175. After that normalized shear stress values are more for stiffened
GP and there is increase in normalized shear stress values with increase in values of .
ASCE
172
ASCE
173
ASCE
CONCLUSIONS
From the above results it may be concluded that with the increase in values of and
normalized load has more values at the same normalized displacement in a stiffened
GP. With increase in values of Kgp, normalized load values increase at the same
displacement in a stiffened GP with stress dependent modulus. The increase in the
normalized load at constant normalized displacement may be attributed to increase in
stiffness of GP.
When GP with stiffened top is provided and stress dependent deformation modulus
is considered, then either with stiffer GP at top ( more) or with more length of stiff
GP at top ( more) or with the higher Kgp of GP, the shear stress reduces at top. Due to
increase in stiffness of GP, the settlement of GP decreases and hence, to satisfy the
compatibility condition, the shear stress in soil reduces near the top of GP. The
increase in the shear stress at greater depths is due to rearrangement of the shear stress
and values shift from the top to bottom side to maintain compatibility at GPsoil
interface.
REFERENCES
Balaam, N. P. and Booker, J. R. 1981. Analysis of rigid raft supported by granular
piles. Int. Jl. for Num. and Anal. Methods in Geomech., Vol. 5, pp. 379403.
Balaam, N. P. and Booker, J. R. 1985. Effect of stone column yeilding on settlement
of rigid foundation in stabilized clay. Int. Jl. for Num. and Anal. Methods in
Geomech., Vol. 9, pp. 331351.
Grover K.S, 2015, Analysis of Single Granular Pile with Stiffened Top, A thesis
submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Department of Civil
Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, India.
Lambe, T. W. and Whitman, R. V. 1969. Soil mechanis, 1st Edition, John Wiley &
Sons, p. 553.
Poorooshasb, H. B. and Meyerhof, G. G. 1997. " Analysis of behaviour of stone
columns and lime columns." Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 4770
Poulos, H.G. 1968. The influence of a rigid pile cap on the settlement behavior of an
axially loaded pile. C.E. Trans. Inst. of Engrs. Australia, CE10, No. 2, pp. 206208.
Poulos, H.G. and Mattes, N. S. 1969. The behaviour of axiallyloaded endbearing
piles. Geotechnique, Vol. 19, pp. 285300.
Poulos, H. G. and Mattes, N. S. 1971. Settlement and load distribution analysis of pile
groups. Aust. Geomech. J., Vol. G2, No. 1: pp. 1120.
Ranjan, G., and Rao, B. G. 1983. Skirted granular piles for ground improvement. Proc.
VIII European Conf. on SMFE, Helsinki.
Sharma J.K., Madhav, M.R., Chandra S, 1997,Analysis of Load Test on Stone
Columns, IGC 97, Vadodara, Theme V, pp. 522.1 to 522.4
Sharma J.K., Madhav, M.R., Chandra S.,and Miura, N., 1998, Prediction of
Settlement of Stone Column Reinforced Ground from Results of In Situ Load
Test, 13th SEAGC, Nov. 1998, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, pp. 421426.
Sharma J.K., Madhav, M.R., Chandra S., 1999, Consideration of NonHomogeneity
of a Granular Pile on Settlement, Int. Conf. on Offshore Engg. (GEOSHORE), in
Dec. 99, ONGC Bombay
Sharma J.K., 1999, Analysis and settlement of granular pile (s) single, in group and
with raft, A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
ASCE
174
175
Abstract: This study presents a finite element model for analysis of laterally loaded
piles in medium stiff clay using ABAQUS program. Three dimensional (3D)
continuum elements are used for both pile and soil elements. The interaction between
the pile and the soil is modelled by using contact surfaces. Frictional behavior between
the pile and the soil is considered in order to model the gap formation and sliding
behavior between the pile and the soil. The response of the pile is presented in terms
of the head deflection of the pile, bending moments, shear forces, deflections along the
length of the pile, the gap formation between the pile and the soil, the py curves and
the stress and displacement distribution within the pilesoil system. The study showed
that the ultimate lateral pile capacity increases with the increase in soil shear strength,
the L/d ratio and the pile diameter. For the cases considered, the maximum bending
moment occurs at a depth of 0.12L to 0.18L.
INTRODUCTION
The problem of pilesoil interaction involves the interaction of two different
materials under complex loading conditions. Theoretical methods and experiments are
used to study the behavior of the laterallyloaded piles. The theoretical methods
include the limit state equilibrium methods (Broms 1964), subgrade reaction methods
(Hsiung 2003), the py curves methods (Reese and Welch 1975; Wu et al. 1998), the
elasticity methods (Poulos and Davis 1980) and the numerical methods (Fan and Long
2005; Ahmadi and Ahmari 2009).
The py method is more popular in geotechnical practice because it is a semianalytical method and it is midway between the simplistic limit state methods and the
rigorous numerical methods. Different researchers proposed different py curves for
different clays. For example: Matlock (1970) for soft clays, Reese and Welch (1975)
for stiff clays above water table, Dunnavart and O'Neill (1989) for stiff clays below
ASCE
water table. Some authors proposed py curves for all clays (e.g. O'Neill and Gazioglu,
1984; Wu et al., 1998). In most of these methods the py curve usually consists of two
parts: an initial nonlinear steep part and a flat linear part after reaching a certain level
of pressure, p. This pressure, p, is assumed to be a fraction of or equal to the ultimate
failure pressure, pu.
The analysis of pilesoil system by finite elements techniques was conducted by
many investigators (Fan and Long 2005; Ahmadi and Ahmari 2009). The finite
element method is a good method in representing the physical nature of the pilesoil
problem. In the finite element models reported in the literature, the soil was modeled
with 2dimensional, 3dimensional or axisymmetric elements with different stressstrain relationships varying from simple linear elastic, elastoplastic or perfectly
plastic material (e.g. MohrCoulomb plasticity, Von Mises, extended DrugerPrager
and Cap plasticity). The pile in most cases was modeled as a linear elastic beam
element.
The objective of this study is to investigate the behavior of laterallyloaded piles
installed in a plastic clay. The effects of different factors on the pile performance such
as pile dimensions and soil shear strength were studied. This study differs from the
studies reported in the literature in the following aspects: (1) The clay material is
different and it is a medium to highly plastic clay, and (2) The study covers a wide
range of L/d ratios ranging from piers to slender piles.
THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
The ABAQUS software was used for the finite element analysis in this study. The
finite element mesh used for the soil was very fine close to the pile and in the upper
region of the soil close to the soil surface (Figure 1). Fixed boundary conditions at the
bottom were generated and the soil sides were fixed horizontally and left free in the
vertical directions. The lateral load was applied to the pile at a point close to the soil
surface.
The finite element type used to model the pile elements was a 3 dimensional solid
element, denoted by C3D8. It is an 8node linear brick element. The pile behavior
was modeled as linearly elastic defined by the material elastic modulus (E) and the
Poisson's ratio () equal to 205MN/m2 and 0.25, respectively.
In modelling the soil also an 8node linear brick element (C3D8) was adopted. In this
study the Modified DruckerPrager model was used to model the soil behavior.
The interface between the pile and the soil was based on surfacetosurface contact as
adopted in ABAQUS program. In this analysis the Coulomb friction model was used
to model the friction behavior between the soil and the pile as the two different bodies
are in contact at their extreme surfaces.
COMPARISON WITH LABORATORY MODEL TESTS
The authors performed laboratory model tests on steel and concrete model piles for
different L/d ratios (Mohamedzein et al. 2013). The results from the laboratory model
test can be used for comparison with the finite element model. The comparison was
made for a steel pile with the following properties: d=58 mm, thickness=1.5 mm,
ASCE
176
embedded length (L)=580 mm and L/d ratio = 10. Figure 1 presents the finite element
mesh for the assembly of the pile and the soil (the mesh dimensions are those of the
tank used in the laboratory model test, e.g. 1250*1000*1400 mm). Figure 2 presents
the loaddeflection curves for the laboratory test result and the FE model results. Both
curves give similar trends with some deviation at smaller and larger loads. The finite
element analysis gives weaker response at small loads and stiffer response at larger
loads.
RESULTS FROM THE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
The behavior of laterally loaded piles installed in clay was presented in terms of
loaddeflection curves at the pile head, distribution of the bending moment and the py
curves. The effects of different factors such as pile diameter, pile length and soil
strength were discussed in this section. The finite element analysis was performed on
typical piles that are used in practice. Steel piles of diameters 500 and 250 mm and
embedded lengths (L) of 5m and 8.75m (L/d ratios 10 and 35) respectively, embedded
in medium stiff clay were considered. The soil depth was 10.0m and its properties are
shown in Table 1. The pile was considered as linearly elastic of modulus of
elasticity=205MN/m2 and Poissons ratio=0.25.
LoadDeflection Curves
The response of the pile can be presented in terms of the applied load and the
deflection at the pile head as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 shows the loaddeflection curves for steel piles with diameter of 0.5 m and installed in clays of
different shear strengths. Figure 4 shows the loaddeflection for steel piles with
length/diameter (L/d) ratios of 10 and 35. The loaddeflection curves are generally
nonlinear. The figures show a ductile behavior with no welldefined peak. Thus, for
these piles the ultimate load can be taken as the load at a deflection of 10% times the
diameter (i.e. 0.1d) as suggested by different investigators (e.g. Briaud, 1997).
The increase in the soil elastic modulus and the shear strength increase the ultimate
lateral pile resistance of the pile (Figure 3). Also, For a given pile diameter, the
ultimate lateral resistance of the pile increases with the increase in L/d ratio (Figure 4).
Distribution of the Bending Moment
Figure 5 shows the distribution of the bending moment with depth for different
applied loads. The maximum bending moment occurs at a depth varying from 0.12L to
0.18L (L is the embedded length of the pile). The depth of the point of the maximum
ASCE
177
178
1400 mm
mom
ment increasses with thee increase in
n the appliedd lateral loaad. Also, thee maximum
m
mom
ment increasses with the increase
i
in L/d
L ratio.
1250 mm
1000 mm
FIG. 1. The finite element meesh for laborratory model test for a pile
mbedded leng
gth (L) =580
0 mm and d
diameter 588mm (L/d=110)
of em
f
FIG
G. 2. Compa
arison betw
ween the reesults of fin
nite elemen
nt
and labo
oratory moodels
ASCE
179
100
21
Cap eccentricity
0.33
0.02
300
E=10000,Cu
=150
d=500 mm
L/d=10
250
Lateral Lo ad (kN)
500010000
0.3
E=5000,
Cu=100
200
150
100
50
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Deflection (mm)
ASCE
180
250
L/d=35
d=250mm
200
L/d=10
d=500mm
150
100
50
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Deflection (mm)
FIG. 4. Loaddeflection curves for piles of different L/d ratios
Moment (kN.m)
10
10
20
30
40
50
0
1
2
Depth (m)
3
4
17.5
35
52.5
70
7
8
9
d=250mm
L/d=35
Cu=100
kP
87.5
105
122.5
140
ASCE
181
d=500m
d=2250m
Deflecction (mm)
FIG. 6. The pyy curves
Thee py Curves
Figure
F
6 show
ws the py cu
urves for steeel pile of di fferent diam
meters. The ffigure showss
thatt py curves are nonlineaar and follow
w similar trennd to those rreported in the literaturee
(i.e.. the py currve usually consists of two
t
parts: aan initial nonnlinear steepp part and a
flat linear part after
a
reachin
ng the ultimaate failure p ressure, pu).. The figuree shows thatt
the soil resistan
nt significanttly increasess with the inccrease in pille diameter ((or decreasee
L ratio for a given leng
gth).
in L/d
ONCLUSION
NS
CO
Finite
F
element analyses were perfo
ormed to sttudy the perrformance oof laterallyload
ded pile in a plastic clay. The pile
p
behavioor includes ultimate lateral load,,
max
ximum bend
ding momentt and the pyy curves. Thhe effect of ddifferent facctors such ass
L/d ratio, pile diameter and
a
soil sheear strengthh were conssidered. Thee followingg
con
nclusions werre drawn fro
om the modeel test resultss:
1. The lo
oaddeflectio
on curves arre generallyy nonlinear specially foor large L/dd
ratios and
a large pille diameters.
ASCE
2. The ultimate lateral pile capacity increases with the increase in L/d ratio and
the increase in the pile diameter. Also the maximum moment increases with
the increase in L/d ratio and the increase in the pile diameter.
3. The maximum bending moment occurs at a depth varying from 0.12L to
0.18L.
4. The py curves are generally nonlinear and the soil resistance increases with
the pile diameter.
REFERENCES
ABAQUS (2008). ABAQUS Standards User's Manual, Version 6.1, Hibbitt,
Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc.
Ahmadi, M. M., and Ahmari, S. (2009). Finiteelement modeling of laterally loaded
piles in clay. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering, Geotechnical
Engineering, 162(GE3), 151163.
Briaud, JL. (1997). Simple approach for lateral loads on piles. Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 123(10), 958964.
Broms, B.B.(1964). Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils. Journal of the Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 90(SM2), 2763.
Dunnavant,T. W., and O'Neill, M. W. (1989). Experimental py model for submerged,
stiff clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 115(1), 95114.
Fan, CC., and Long, J. H. (2005). Assessment of existing methods for predicting soil
response of laterally loaded piles in sand. Journal of Computers and Geotechnics,
Elsevier, 32, 274289.
Fatahi, B., Basack, S., Ryan, P., WanHuan Zhou, WH., and Khabbaz H. (2014).
'Performance of laterally loaded piles considering soil and interface parameters'.
Geomechanics and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 495 524.
Hsiung, YM. (2003). Theoretical elasticplastic solution for laterally loaded piles.
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 129(6), 475480.
Matlock, H. (1970). Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay.
Proceedings, 2nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA,
577594.
Mohamedzein, Yahia EA., Nour Eldaim, Fath Alrahman E. and Abdelwahab, Abu
Bakr (2013). Laboratory model tests on laterallyloaded piles in plastic clay.
International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 7, N0. 3, pp. 241250..
ONeill, M. W., and Gazioglu, S. M. (1984). An evaluation of py relationships in
clays. American Petroleum Institute Report PRAC 82412, 193 p.
Poulos, H. G., and Davis, E. H. (1980). Pile Foundation Analysis and Design. John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Reese, L. C., and R. C. Welch. (1975). Lateral loading of deep foundations in stiff
clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 101(GT7), 633649.
Wu, D., Broms, B. B., and Choa, V. (1998). Design of laterally loaded piles in
cohesive soils using py curves. Journal of Soils and Foundations, Japanese
Geotechnical Society, 38(2), 1726.
ASCE
182
183
Abstract: In this paper the settlement behavior and load bearing capacity of shallow
ring and circular foundations resting on anisotropic soil medium are studied. The case
of an axisymmetric body subjected to symmetric tensile and compressive forces is
analyzed here. In order to avoid rigorous calculation and make the problem lucid, the
soil has been assumed to be linearly elastic and only the half domain has been
considered for the analysis. The soil domain has been discretized with small grids for
adopting finite difference technique to calculate the relevant physical quantities in
each grid. Various plots have been included for better understanding of the behavior of
ring foundations and to illustrate the effect of anisotropy.
INTRODUCTION
In the last few decades, urbanization has affected the earth and the soil beneath it, in
lashing ways. With rampant urbanization, more number of buildings gets constructed
to accommodate the incoming flux of people rushing to the cities. The marvelous
structures built nowadays do reflect the tremendous achievement of civil engineering.
A very important part in any civil engineering structure is the design of its foundation.
Two important factors need to be ensured during foundation design i.e., the bearing
capacity and the settlement behavior. Erroneous estimation of bearing capacity may
lead to catastrophic events whereas in the case of settlement, it must be within the
permissible range. Thus both these factors go hand in hand while designing a
foundation. Among different types of foundation, ring foundation is one of the crucial
substructures, which is widely used in silos, communication towers, chimneys, water
tanks etc. Ring foundations were first studied by Fisher (1957). Later on, other
researchers have also performed elaborate studies on this topic [Egorov (1965),
Madhav (1980), Ohri et al. (1997), Hataf and Razavi (2003), Boushehrian and Hataf
(2003), Kumar and Ghosh (2005), Ahmad et al. (2014)]. This special type of
foundation may be subjected to huge compressive loads due to its selfweight along
ASCE
with
h different live
l
loads su
uch as weigh
ht of water stored in thhe tanks, winnd load etc.
Rin
ng foundation
n systems peerform betteer due to the confinemennt effect of ssoil medium
m
encllosed within
n the annularr portion of the footing enabling thee soil to beaar additionall
load
ds [Rathour (2009)]. In
n the presen
nt work, ringg foundation system em
mbedded inn
anissotropic soil medium subjected to working
w
com
mpressive andd tensile loaads has beenn
anallyzed and th
he results haave been rep
ported by varrying imporrtant parameeters such ass
ri/ro (where ri an
nd ro are the inner and outer radius oof the annulaar footing reespectively),,
anissotropy parameter (), an
nd embedmeent depth of foundation ((De).
In this study,
s
the so
oil medium is assumed to be lineaarly elastic. M
Most of thee
prev
vious studies have assum
med the sim
mple model oof isotropic soil medium
m. However,,
the soil owing to
t its formattion and variious other cooupled phennomena usuaally behavess
as an
a anisotropiic medium (Graham
(
and
d Houlsby, 11943). Moreeover, in abssence of anyy
horiizontal exterrnal force, the
t soil parrticles do haave a tendenncy to movve verticallyy
dow
wnwards ow
wing to grav
vity. Therefo
fore, it is p lausible to assume its anisotropicc
beh
havior. In thee analysis, an
a effort has been made to bridge thhe gap of knnowledge inn
this particular to
opic of foundation behav
vior in anisootropic soil.
OBLEM DE
EFINITION
N
PRO
FIG
G.1 Represeentation off soil doma
ain (surfacee footing on left and embedded
d
footting on righ
ht)
Thee current pro
oblem domaain befits to be represennted throughh cylindricall coordinatee
systtem (rz), however
h
duee to the sym
mmetrical loaading of the domain it reesults in twoo
dim
mensional po
olar coordinaate scheme where
w
tennds to infinitty. The soill domain onn
whiich the foun
ndation is reesting is illu
ustrated in F
Fig. 1. For ssimplicity, hhalf domainn
anallysis is beeen considereed here. KL
LMN repressents the axxisymmetric and twodim
mensional dom
main under consideratio
on. The surfaace footing iis resting onn the groundd
leveel to carry th
he compresssive load, whereas
w
to taake care of tthe uplift thhe footing iss
emb
bedded at a depth
d
De as shown in Fig. 1. The surrface footingg is compresssed under a
statiic working load intensity q, whereas the embeedded footinng is subjectted to samee
mag
gnitude (q) of
o pullout loaad intensity. The load inntensity is appplied betweeen the innerr
(ri) and outer (r
( o) radius in
n case of riing foundatiion, while ri tends to zzero for thee
circcular foundation. The ho
orizontal disstance (W) ffrom the edgge of the footing to thee
ASCE
184
185
extreme side boundary (LM) and the domain depth (H) are taken as 10D and 14D
respectively, where D is the outer diameter of the footing. It is worth mentioning here
that the domain size has been fixed based on the sensitivity analysis performed by
Ahmad et al. (2014). The soil has been idealized as linearly elastic, homogenous and
anisotropic. For finite difference formulation the domain has been discretized into
small grids and displacement of each grid point is obtained by running an iterative
program in MATLAB. The width (dr) and depth (dz) of the grids are kept as same as
0.05D as reported by Ghosh and Sharma (2010).
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
The theory of elasticity has been employed similar to the methodology considered
by many researchers [Ghosh and Sharma (2010), Nainegali and Basudhar (2011),
Ahmad et al. (2014)]. The stressstrain and straindisplacement relations for an
anisotropic medium in polar coordinate system could be employed in the equilibrium
equations to formulate the governing partial differential equations for determining the
horizontal and the vertical displacements in the soil domain. However, the partial
differential equations thus obtained are quite difficult to solve analytically. In similar
cases, several researchers have resorted to the finite difference technique for obtaining
a solution [Maheshwari and Viladkar (2007), Ghosh and Sharma (2010)] and hence,
the same finite difference scheme is adopted here to solve the governing differential
equations for the displacements.
Equilibrium Conditions
The equilibrium equations in presence of symmetric loading conditions which
results in symmetry along axis can be expressed as,
r rz r
rz
z rz
+
+
=0;
(1a and b)
+
+
= 0
r
r
z
r
r
z
where r, , and z are the normal stresses along r, and z directions respectively
and rz is the shear stress along r direction on the z plane.
Generalized Hookes law for anisotropic soil medium
The stressstrain relation in an anisotropic medium can be obtained using Hookes
law and the resulting equations after expressing the strains in terms of displacements
in the polar coordinate system can be expressed as,
r =
=
z =
2
* u
2 *u
* w
(1 ) r + r + z
(1 + )(1 2 )
*
(2a)
2 * u
2
* u
* w
r + (1 ) r + z
(1 + )(1 2 )
*
(2b)
* u
u w
*u
* w
r + r + (1 ) z ; rz = G z + r (2c and 2d)
(1 + )(1 2 )
*
E *
2(1 + * )
. is an anisotropic
parameter. Ev and Eh are the vertical and horizontal elastic modulus of soil,
respectively. The modified Poissons ratio is denoted by *. Gvh, hh and vh are the
ASCE
186
shear modulus and Poissons ratio of the transversely isotropic (i.e., anisotropic) soil
medium, respectively. The displacement components along r and z directions are
denoted as u and w, respectively.
Governing Partial Differential Equations
By substituting the expressions for the normal and shear stress from Eq. 2 in Eq. 1,
the partial difference equations can be obtained to determine the horizontal and
vertical displacements anywhere in the soil domain and are expressed as
2u 1 u 1 2 u u
G * u u 1 w
G*
+
+
+
+ +
= 0;
2 r r r 2 z r 2 1 2 * r r r z
*
2 w 1 w 1 2 w
u u 1 w
+ G
G*
+
+
+ +
= 0;
2 r r r 2 z 1 2 * z r r z
(3a)
(3b)
(1 * ) dr
2c
(Uj,i1 Uj,i+1)
(4a)
1 *
(1 2 * )
(Wj1,i + Wj+1,i) +
(Wj,i1 + Wj,i+1) +
k
2k
+ Uj1,i1) +
dr
4k r
(Uj1,i  Uj+1,i) +
1 2 * dr
4k
8k
(Wj,i1  Wj,i+1)
(4b)
)(
k = 2 1 * + 1 2 *
Here j and i represent the row and column in the finite difference grid, respectively.
) (
Boundary Conditions
The boundary conditions in accordance with stressstrain compatibility along the soil
domain can be listed as follows: Along the plane of symmetry (PoS) KN and the right
extreme boundary (LM), the horizontal displacement (Uj,i) is kept restricted. In case of
surface footing other than the loading zone along the ground surface, the normal and
shear stress are zero (z=0; rz=0) due to the absence of any external force. Along the
base of the soil domain, it is plausible to assume zero horizontal (Uj,i) and vertical
(Wj,i) displacements. Along the footingsoil interface, the horizontal displacement is
made zero to simulate perfectly rough condition. Loading zone beneath surface and
embedded footing, along EF: z=q; and za zb=q respectively, where q is the
magnitude of load intensity acting on the footing, superscripts a and b denote the
stresses above and below the embedded footing level respectively. The loading
condition for the embedded footing is similar to that reported by Kumar and Naskar
(2012). These constraints yield the following equations for surface footing,
Wj,i=
ASCE
)(
q 1 + * 1 2 * dr
(1 )
*
+
*
21*
(Uj,i+1 Uj,i1)
dr
(1 ) r U
j,i
+Wj+1,i
(5a)
187
W j,i =
*
+
1*
) (U
j + 1, i + 1
U j 1, i + 1 U j + 1, i 1 + U j 1, i 1
U j 1 , i U j + 1 , i dr + 2 1 qdr
*
G*
2 1
(5b)
The equations for the load carrying (bearing or uplift) capacity q for a given limiting
displacement (), on the foundation are given by the following equations where wj,i =
i) For surface footing:
q=
E*
*
(1 + )(1 2 )dz
(U j ,i +1 U j ,i 1 ) + *
dr
U j ,i ]
r
(6a)
E * (1 * )
(1 + * )(1 2 * )dz
* dr
1* r
)[
W j 2,i + W j + 2,i
2
(U j 1,i U j +1,i ) W j ,i ]
*
2(1 * )
(6b)
RESULTS
Circular surface footings and embedded footings
The anisotropy parameter is varied for all the cases as = 0.5, 1, 2 with = 1
implying isotropic case, whereas = 0.5 means the soil is stiffer vertically than
horizontally and = 2 entails the reverse. The value of * used in this analysis is 0.3.
Fig.2 and Fig.3 represent the normalized loadsettlement graphs for circular surface
and embedded (De/D = 1) footing, respectively. In both the cases, the settlement at a
constant applied loading intensity (q/E* = 0.005 in case of surface footing and q/E* =
0.01 in case of embedded footing) is determined. It can be observed that the
settlement/displacement of the footing increases with decrease in . Fig. 4 lays out the
variation of normalized stress along the base of the domain in radial direction for
circular surface footing experiencing limiting settlement (/D=0.01). The normalized
stress is found to be maximum at the plane of symmetry (PoS) having the same
magnitude for all values of and then gradually decreases with increase in the radial
distance and eventually becomes zero towards the end of the domain. Further, it can
be also noted that at a particular radial distance from PoS, the normalized stress is
found to increase as increases. Fig. 5 shows the variation of the settlement at the
ground level along the radial direction, when the surface footing is subjected to a
working load intensity of q/E*=0.005. The settlement is seen to be maximum near the
loading zone following a decreasing trend towards the farthermost area of the domain.
As explained in Fig.2, the settlement is found to decrease proportionally beneath the
surface footing with increase in . The point of inflexion i.e., the point at which the
settlement trend with respect to gets reversed is observed at r/D=1. The variation of
normal stress developed at level of the circular embedded footing subjected to
specified upward limiting displacement (/D=0.02) is presented in Fig. 6. It can be
noted that the effect of is more pronounced as the embedment depths increases. Also
it can be deduced that the influence zone for embedded footing subjected to pullout
force at De/D = 3 is greater than that at De/D = 1. Similar to the normalized stress
response of the surface footing, the anisotropic factor has a similar effect on the
ASCE
188
normalized stress along the embedment depth and the normalized stresses are found to
be deviating maximum at around r/D=2 and 4 for De/D=1 and 3 respectively.
q/E*
q/E*
/D
/D
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.0000 0.0025 0.0050 0.0075
0.08
0.000
=0.5
= 0.5
0.07
0.005
=1.0
= 1.0
0.06
=2.0
0.010
=2.0
0.05
0.015
0.04
0.020
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.030
0.01
0.035
0.00
0.040
FIG. 2. Normalized loadsettlement
FIG. 3. Normalized load displacement
plot for surface footing
plot for embedded footing
5
0.0010
10
0.0006
0.0002
0.02
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
q/E*=0.005
0.05
r/D
10
0.08
0.06
z/E*
/D=0.02
De/D=3
De/D=1
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
r/D
10
De/D=1
De/D=3
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
/D
10
0.01
0.04
/D=0.01
0.0000
ASCE
r/D
0.03
0.0004
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.0010
0.0012
0.0014
0.00
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.0008
z/E*
/D
r/D
0.04
0.02
0.00
q/E*=0.01
189
Fig. 7 shows the variation of displacement along the embedded footing layer under a
static working load intensity (q/E*=0.01). The effect of anisotropy factor is same as
that for circular footing. In reference to Fig.3, the anisotropic factor has an effect on
vertical displacement of the foundation subjected to uplift capacity. The effects are
more pronounced for higher embedment depths. The point of inflexion occurs between
r/D=1.2 and 1.6 for both the embedment depths.
Annular surface footings and embedded footings
Fig.8 and Fig.9 illustrate the normalized loadsettlement plot for annular footing and
embedded footing respectively for induced limiting settlement/displacement
[/D=0.01 in case of footing and /D= 0.02 in case of embedded footing (De/D=3),
the ve sign implying upward displacement]. For both the cases, ri/ro has been varied
as 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8. It can be noted that for a particular ri/ro, the bearing capacity
increases as increases. This is in line with the findings of Srinivasan and Ghosh
(2014) for a plane strain angular foundations. But this trend occurs only in annular
footing and not in case of annular embedded footing. Also, for all the values of , the
maximum bearing/uplift capacity occurs at maximum value of ri/ro and vice versa. To
understand the efficacy of ring foundations over circular foundations, two efficiency
factors have been defined as,
= average settlement of annular surface or embedded footing carrying the working load
average settlement of circular surface or embedded footing at the same working load
Q = Total load resisted by ring surface or embedded footing experiencing the limiting settlement
Total load resisted by circular surface or embedded footing at the limiting settlement
The values of these two factors have been determined by applying the same amount of
2
working load (Q) or limiting displacement () over the annular footing (Q/E* ro
2
190
q/E*
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
0.005
0.02
0.01
/D
0.2
0.4
ri/ro
0.6
0.8
10
0.004
0.020
/D
Q/E*
=0.005
0.6
r/D
5
De/D=3
/D
0.025
0.010
0.4
ri/ro
0.002
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.4
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.2
0.8
0.008
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.0
0.000
0.006
ASCE
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.8
/D
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.000
0.00
0.01
0.014
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.012
0.020
q/E*
ri/ro=0.4
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=2.0
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.015
10
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.4
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.010
0.005
0.000
Q/E*
=0.01
191
z/E*
0.0008
0.0007
0.0006
0.0005
0.0004
0.0003
0.0002
0.0001
0.0000
r/D
10
/D=0.01
r/D
10
0.0000
0.0002
/D=0.02
0.0004
z/E*
0.0006
ri/ro=0.4
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
0.0008
0.0010
0.0012
De/D=3
ri/ro=0.4
ri/ro=0.6
ri/ro=0.8
=0.5
=1.0
=2.0
ASCE
iii)
iv)
v)
From the efficiency factors, it can be ascertained that the efficacy of ring
foundations is more than circular ones both in terms of bearing capacity and
uplift capacity.
The critical value of ri/ro is found to be 0.6 which is close to the value reported
in previous research works. [Ohri et al. (1997), Boushehrian and Hataf (2003),
Ahmad S K (2014)].
The normalized stress distribution and vertical deformation across the radial
direction are presented for both circular and annular footings/embedded
footings.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, S. K., Srinivasan, V. and Ghosh, P. (2014). Analysis of annular footings and
anchors lying on elastic soil medium using finite difference technique.
5th International Congress on Computational Mechanics and Simulation, December
1013, 2014, Chennai, India.
Boushehrian, H.J. and Hataf, N. (2003). Experimental and numerical investigation of
the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 21, 241256.
Egorov, K.E. (1965). Calculation of bed for foundation with ring footing.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Soil Mechanical Foundation
of Engineers, 2, Montreal, 4145.
Fisher, K., (1957). Zur Berechnung der setzung Von Fundamenten in der form einer
Kreisformigen Ringflache. Der Bauingenieur, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 32 (5), 172
174 (in German).
Ghosh, P and Sharma, A (2010). Interference effect of two nearly strip footings on
layered soil: theory of elasticity approach. Acta Geotechnica, 5, 189198.
Graham, J. and Houlsby, G.T. (1983). Anisotropic elasticity of a natural clay.
Geotechnique, 33 (2), 165180.
Hataf, N., and Razavi, M.R., (2003). Behavior of ring footing on sand. Iranian
Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Vol. 27, 4756.
Kumar, J., and Ghosh, P., (2005). Bearing capacity factor N for ring footings using
the method of characteristics. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(5), 14741484.
Kumar, J. and Naskar, T. (2012). Vertical uplift capacity of a group of two coaxial
anchors in a general c soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49(3), 367373.
Madhav, M.R. (1980). Settlement and allowable pressures for ring footings. Indian
Geotechnical Journal, 10 (3), 267271.
Maheshwari, P and Viladkar, M.N (2007). Strip footings on a three layer soil system:
theory of elasticity approach. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,
1, 4759.
Nainegali, L.S and Basudhar, P.K (2011). Interference of two closely spaced
footings: A finite element modeling. Geo Frontiers, ASCE, 37263735.
Ohri, M.L., Purhit, D.G.M. and Dubey, M.L. (1997). Behavior of ring footings on
dune sand overlaying dense sand. Proceedings of International Conference of
Civil Engineers, Tehran, Iran.
Rathour, D.S. (2009). Settlement for ring footings through strain influence diagrams
including stiffness non linearity. M Tech Thesis, IIT Kanpur.
ASCE
192
193
Assistant Professor, Structural Engineering Dept., AinShams Univ., Abbasseya, Cairo, Egypt. Email:
nasr.eid@eng.asu.edu.eg
2
Assistant Professor, Structural Engineering Dept., AinShams Univ., Abbasseya, Cairo, Egypt. Email:
tamer.sorour@eng.asu.edu.eg
Abstract: The objective of this research work is to study the behavior of PiledRaft
foundations subjected to vertical and lateral loads. Study for most of the previous
research in this field shows that most of these studies analyzed PiledRaft foundations
in 2D plane presenting the pile as a spring which may not give very accurate results. In
this research, 3D finite element method is suggested to represent PiledRaft
interaction. This leads to better representation for the elements which gives more
reliable results such as (axial displacement, rotational displacement, vertical forces and
moments acting on the pile and the raft). The results from this analysis will be
compared with the results of a case study on a bridge in Basra, Iraq called (Fly Over
Bridge) in order to verify the model. An extensive parametric study will be performed
to assess the effect of various factors on the internal forces generated in the raft and
piles. From analysis, there are important recommendations concerning the maximum
inclination angle of the pile, and the diameter of the piles on the internal forces
generated in the foundation and the piles and their equilibrium.
INTRODUCTION
Batter piles have been used for a long time to resist large lateral loads from winds,
water waves, soil pressures, and impacts. Their distinct advantage over vertical piles is
that they transmit the applied lateral loads partly in axial compression, rather than only
through shear and bending. Thus, batter piles offer larger stiffness and bearing capacity
than same diameter and depth vertical piles a superiority of particular importance when
the near surface soils are soft and/or the lateral load is large. Despite these advantages,
batter piles have low resistance against seismic resistance. Following the poor
performance of batter piles in a series of earthquakes, the seismic behavior of inclined
piles has been considered detrimental, and many codes require that such piles be
avoided. For instance, the French Seismic Code (AFPS1990) states flatly that Inclined
piles should not be used to resist seismic loads. The seismic Euro code EC8/ Part5,
dealing with geotechnical and foundations, is a little less restrictive, stating: It is
recommended that no inclined piles be used for transmitting lateral loads to the soil. If,
ASCE
194
in any case, such piles are used, they must be designed to carry safely axial as well as
bending loading.
FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
Finite element model using (MIDAS GTS) program is suggested to represent piledraft foundation interaction. This program features from other software that solves the
problem in 3D and represents the shaft pile properties. This leads to better
representation for the element which gives good results such as (Axial displacement,
rotational displacement, vertical forces and moments acting on the pile and foundation).
MOHRCOULOMB MODEL
The MohrCoulomb model is used to simulate most terrain and it displays sufficiently
reliable results for general nonlinear analysis of the ground.
Eqn. 1
MIDAS GTS can simulate changes in the modulus of elasticity and cohesion with
height for a Mohr Coulomb model using equation (1). If the amount of cohesion
change with height is 0 (zero), a constant value is used. If the amount of change is not
0 (zero), the cohesion can be calculated with respect to a reference height using
equation.
Eqn. 2
cref
cinc
yref
The y in equation (2) represents the integral position of the element. If the integral
position is located higher than y ref, the cohesion can be smaller than '0'. To prevent this,
the cohesion value is not decreased any further and the c ref value is used.
Failure function of MohrCoulomb model According to Mohr (1900), failure can be
expressed using the following equation:
Eqn. 3
c
: Cohesion
: Internal friction angle
ASCE
195
Equation (3) shows that material failure occurs at the stress state where the largest
Mohr circle comes across the Coulomb friction failure envelope. It also shows that the
does not have an effect on the failure
intermediate principal stress
condition. Hence, the failure function of the MohrCoulomb failure plane is as follows:
Eqn. 4
The failure criterion of equation (4) is called the MohrCoulomb criterion and it is the
most widely used method for ground materials due to its simplicity and accuracy.
Expressing the MohrCoulomb criterion using principal stress terms
equation can be rearranged into the following equation:
Eqn. 5
ASCE
196
ASCE
197
Loose
Sand
Soft Clay
Sand &
Gravel
Stiff
Clay
5.0
14.7
12.5
17.2
17.5
20.6
25.0
18.6
19.1/9.29
9.8
11.3
11.8
32.0
45.0
25.0
30.0
40.0
95.0
75.0
100.0
1.9
10.0
4.8
200.0
150.0
562.5
The ground water level was considered on a depth of 2.50 m from the ground surface.
Foundation Data
The foundation was modeled using linear elastic concrete elements with total
dimensions of:
Width = 8.40 m, Length = 19.2 m, Thickness = 1.0 m.
Cases of Loading
Several models were established in order to simulate the effect of different loading
conditions on the behavior of the pile group in conjunction with the footing and soil
condition. A summary of the results obtained from the FEM are presented in Figs (47).
Table 3. Applied Loads
ASCE
Loading
P (kN)
M (kN/m2)
First
13881
7810
Second
12881
6810
Third
11881
5810
Forth
10881
4810
Fifth
9881
3810
FIG. 4. (a) Variation of max. Vertical displacement (Dz) with loading on piles; (b)
Variation of max. Shearing force with loading on piles; (c) Variation of max.
Vertical force with loading on piles; (d) Variation of max. Moment with loading on
piles
By comparing the results of the FEM with the actual results obtained from the case
study as illustrated in Figs (47), we can conclude that there is good agreement between
the results of both cases.
PARAMETRIC STUDY
An extended parametric study was carried out to examine different factors affecting
the distribution of loads on a group of piles. The principle parameters, considered in
this study, are: pile diameter and the angle of inclination of piles, with different types
and condition of soils. A summary of the analyses are presented in Figs (814)
ASCE
198
FIG. 5. (a) Variation of pile diameter with vertical displacement (Dz) of piles; (b)
Variation of pile diameter with max. Rotational displacement (Rz) of footing; (c)
Variation of pile diameter with max. Rotational displacement (Rx) of footing; (d)
Variation of pile diameter with max. Rotational displacement (Ry) of footing.
Effect of angle of inclination of piles
FIG. 6. (a) Variation of angle of inclination of piles with max. Vertical displacement of
piles; (b) Variation of angle of inclination of piles with max. Vertical force on piles;
Variation of angle of inclination of piles with max. Moment on piles
ASCE
199
CONCLUSIONS
1 The results from finite element model using (MIDAS GTS) program are compared
with the results of a case study on a bridge in Basra, Iraq called (Fly Over Bridge)
and the results were in good agreement.
2 It could be concluded that; increasing the pile diameter results in decreasing the
vertical displacement of piles in the examined soil types.
3 By increasing the pile diameter; the maximum rotational displacement of footing in
the examined soil types is decreased.
4 It could be concluded that; by increasing the inclination angle of the pile from 0o to
25o; this leads to decrease the vertical displacement of piles in the examined soil
types.
5 Increasing the inclination angle of the pile from 0o to 25o results in decreasing
conveniently the vertical force on piles in dry sandy and clayey soils.
6 It could be concluded that; increasing the inclination angle of the pile from 0o to 10o
has small effect on moment. While, the moment on the piles is decreased by
increasing the angle from 10o to 25o.
REFERENCES
Association Franaise de Gnie Parasismique (AFPS). (1990).
Aschenbrenner, Rudolf, "ThreeDimensional Analysis of Pile Foundations," Journal of
the Structural Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 93, February
1967, p 201.
Banerjee, P.K., and Davies, T.G. (1978). The behavior of axially and laterally loaded
piles embedded in nonhomogeneous soils. Geotechnique, 28(3), 309326.
Banerjee, P.K., and Davies, T.G. (1980). Analysis of some reported case histories of
laterally loaded pile groups. Numerical methods in off shore piling, Institution of
Civil Engineers (ICE), London, 101108.
Deng, N., Kulesza R., and Ostadan, F.2007. Seismic soilpile group interaction
analysis of a battered pile group. Proc.,4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical
Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Laboratory of Soil Mechanics,
Foundation and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Greece.
Gerolymos, N., and Gazetas, G. (2006). Winkler model for lateral response of rigid
caisson foundations in linear soil. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(5), 347361.
Giannakou, A. (2007). Seismic behavior of inclined piles. Ph.D. thesis, National
Technical Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Hrennikoff, A., "Analysis of Pile Foundations with Batter Piles," Transactions,
American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 115, Paper No. 2401, 1950, p 351.
Kavazanjian, E. (2006). A drivenpile advantage: Batter piles. Pile driver, Q4, 2125.
Padron, L. A., Aznarez, J. J., Maeso, O., and Santana, A. (2009). Dynamic stiffness of
deep foundations with inclined piles. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38, 10531070.
Sadek, M., and Shahrour, I. (2004). Threedimensional finite element analysis of the
seismic behavior of inclined micro piles. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 24,473485.
ASCE
200
Hunan Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Engineering Safety, Xiangtan Univ., Xiangtan 411105,
China.
2
Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Engineering Rheology, Central South Univ. of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China.
3
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and
Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., 610065, China.
ASCE
201
202
soil inside the embankment accumulates a complex stress history during the layered filling process, resulting in a complex settlement deformation caused by
overconsolidation, dilatancy and strain softening at the state of low external confining
pressure and high internal vertical stress. Therefore, an advanced rheological constitutive model should be proposed to describe the overconsolidation and timedependent
deformation characteristics of compacted clay of highfilled embankment.
Scholars from all over the world have conducted many successful studies on the deformation characteristics and constitutive model of overconsolidated clay. Dafalias provided a boundary surface model. Hashiguchi suggested the concept of subloading yield
surface. Asaoka introduced the concept of superloading and subloading yield surface for
overconsolidated soil and structural soil. Nakai applied the concept of subloading yield
surface to the tij model. Yao developed an overconsolidation constitutive model and a
modified model based on the Hvorslev surface. But most of these proposed constitutive
models are elastoplastic constitutive models, which cannot describe the timedependent
deformation characteristic of overconsolidated clay. To overcome this difficult problem, Wang proposed an advanced elasticviscoplastic constitutive model to predict
timedependent behavior of the overconsolidated clay based on the subloading surface
model and relative overstress relation, and its stress integration algorithms is also presented, which makes the new model convenient to be implemented into the finite element software such as ABAQUS. As an illustration of the rheological settlement performance of the highfilled embankment, the case of the damlike embankment of Lanhai highway between the pile numbers from K50+650 to K50+860, has been investigated using the proposed new model.
BASIC EQUATIONS OF NEW ELASTICVISCOPLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE
MODEL
The viscoplastic strain rate component ijvp is defined as
ijvp = ( F )
f d
ij
(1)
(F ) =
F 0
F >0
(2)
where c0 and m' are parameters related to the timedependent properties of clay; kd is the
parameter representing both effect of strainhardening and strainrate; ku is a volumetric
strainhardening parameter for overconsolidated clay. The dynamic yield function f d is
defined as
f d = q M m + ln m = kd
(3)
where M is the stress ratio at critical state; q is the deviator stress; m is the mean effective stress. According to the subloading yield surface concept proposed by Hashiguchi &
Ueno (1977), a new reference yield function fu for overconsolidated clay is adopted as
shown in Figure 1, and it is given as
ASCE
203
ku =
1 + e0 vp
)
v
+ ln ( myi
1 + e0
(4)
is the initial consolidation stress; e0 is the initial void ratio; vvp is the viswhere myi
coplastic volumetric strain; is the over consolidation ration at initial stress state;
and is the compression index and swelling index, respectively; is a void ratio
difference between point A at the overconsolidated state and point B at normally consolidated state as shown in Fig.1b, and it is given by
= ( ) ln
pN1e
= ( ) ln OCR
pN1
(5)
pN1
is the over consolidation ration at initial stress state. For convenwhere OCR= pN1e
are the
and pN1
ience, OCR is substituted by in the following statement. pN1e
intercepts of normally consolidated yield locus and overconsolidated subloading yield
locus at the mean effective stress p axis, respectively.
q
e0
1
X ( p , q )
f s = ks
f d = kd
f u = ku
p0 = 1kPa
vvp pN1
pN1e
ln p
p0 = 1kPa
pN1
pN1e
ln p
d
= ad dp
(1 + e0 ) 2
(6)
where a is a material parameter to control the change rate of overconsolidation ratio. The
peak strength of overconsolidated clay decreases with increasing a . When a = 0 , the
overconsolidated clay will become a normally consolidated clay. A dynamic equilibrium
equation g ( ij , vvp , dvp ) for overconsolidated clay is given as
m
c
1+ e0 vp vp
v d = 0
g(ij , , ) = 0 m exp m +
Mm myi
M
vp
v
vp
d
(7)
ASCE
204
65
69
20 10
15.3
29
45
25
1:2.
2
20
1:2
327.5
17.5 12.2517.5 2
12.25
20
45
1:2
.25
Baserock
327.5
65
1:2
.25
Medium strength silt
.25
1:2
6.3
6.3
1:1
.75
1:2
75
1:1.
5
7.4
35.6
75.3
58.6
Ushaped slope
20 10 10
75.3
50
29
23
6.3
43.4
10
52.5
5.7
20.2
14.9
19.3
75.3
10.4
6.7
93# Zone
Base rock
90# Zone
70
Set1
56
Set2
42
Set3
Set4
Set5
28
Set7
14
0
Set10
50
100
150
200
250
T im e /d
300
350
400
Set8
Set11
Set12
Set6
Set9
FIG.3. Filling progress chart of Lanhai highway between the pile numbers from
K50+650 to K50+860
ASCE
205
1.7280E6
3.4560E6
1.2096E7
1.3824E7
1.7280E7
1.9008E7
2.3328E7
2.4192E7
2.5920E7
2.6784E7
2.8512E7
3.1104E7
3.3700E7
3.1363E8
Void ratio
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
10
=21.7% K=90%
=21.7% K=93%
=21.7% K=96%
100
1000
Consolidation pressure/kPa
ASCE
206
dicted results are in accordance with the test data. So it can be used to describe the rheological settlement of embankment. As the preconsolidation pressure of compacted clay
sample prepared by the indoor standard compaction test is always lower than that produced by the onsite road roller, the onsite model parameters pc and c were also given in
Table 2 by inverse analysis according to the observing settlement of the damlike embankment of Lanhai highway.
Table 2. Parameters for compacted clay
K/%
e0
c0 / s 1
96
93
90
0.646
0.703
0.767
0.3
0.3
0.3
2.10
2.05
1.90
0.10057
0.11347
0.12023
0.01487
0.01683
0.02024
1.96E13
1.96E13
1.96E13
22.5
22.5
22.5
490
500
510
K=96%
K=90%
10
1 /%
(a) 3 =50kPa
15
20
v/%
v/%
10
10
K=93%
K=90%
K=96%
1 = 0.125%/min
5
10
1 /%
15
(b) 3 =100kPa
20
v/%
K=93%
1 = 0.125%/min
0
1
K=90%
c/kPa
Indoor Onsite
155.0
264.6
107.8
200.6
68.3
136.6
pc /kPa
Indoor Onsite
510
1012
390
986
310
857
10
K=93%
K=96%
1 = 0.125%/min
10
15
20
1 /%
(c) 3 =200kPa
FIG.5. Stressstrain curves and stress ratiovolume changestrain curves of compacted clay
FIG.6. Comparison between predicted result and test data of compacted clay
ASCE
207
NUMERICAL RESULTS
Two sets of model parameters given in Table 2 were used to calculate the settlement,
one of them was determined by indoor test, and another one was obtained by inverse
analysis with the factual settlement observation data of Lanhai highway in field as
shown in Figure 7. It shows that the greater settlement value than observing settlement is
obtained in simulation with the model parameters directly according to indoor laboratory
data without regard to the actual preconsolidation pressure. The preconsolidation
pressure pc and cohesive force c obtained by inverse analysis is nearly twice higher than
that according to the indoor test. When the preconsolidation pressure is relatively high,
the amount of settlement would be small. Furthermore, the numerical results are in
agreement with the measured results, so the rheological settlement can be simulated
reasonably using the elasticviscoplastic constitutive model based on subloading yield
surface.
Settlement /cm
80
60
40
20
0
Filling height /m
Construction progress /d
100
15
30
45
60
Settlement /cm
30
60
90
120
1000
(a)
80
60
40
20
0
Postconstruction settlement
Construction settlement
Construction settlement
Predicted settlement
Postconstruction settlement
Filling height /m
Construction progress /d
100
1000
Predicted settlement
FIG.7.Time history curve of settlement of observation and finite element calculation of damlike embankment of Lanhai highway
ASCE
208
If the embankment simulated by inverse analysis parameters (as shown in Figure 7a)
was slitting along transverse section and vertical section, displacement maps of several
layers were obtained as shown in Figure 8. It shows that the maximal observation displacement occurs in the middle set4 layer of the embankment, reaching 64cm. The displacement in the bottom and the top layer is smaller than that occurring in the fourth
layer, which is only 20~30cm. It means that the displacement occurs at the top of or the
bottom cannot always be the maximum value, namely, itself settlement deformation of
the highfilled embankment cannot be ignored.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
40
60
80
100
50
100
150
200
20
Settlement /cm
Settlement /cm
20
50
100
150
200
Relative distance /m
250
300
40
60
80
100
50
100
150
Relative distance /m
200
ASCE
REFERENCES
Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T.(1997). "Soilwater Coupled Behavior of Heavily Overconsolidated Clay Near/at Critical State." Soils and Foundations, Vol.37(1): 1328.
Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T. (2000). "Elastoplastic Behavior of Structured Overconsolidated Soils." Journal of Application Mechanics, (3): 335342.
Dafalias Y F.(1986). "Bounding Surface Plasticity I: Mathematical Formulation and
Hypoplasticity." Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol.112(9): 966985.
Duan Zhugeng, CHEN Xiaobin.(2007). "Analysis on stone earth fillings embankment's
rehgological settlement surveying and calculation." Journal of Railway Science and
Engineering, Vol.4(5): 5762.
Hashiguchi K.(1989). "Subloading Surface Model in Unconventional Plasticity." International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol.25(8): 917945.
Lu Qing, Shang Yuequan, Chen Yunfa,et al.(2005). "Backanalysis of viscoelastic
parameters of filling materials and settlement prediction for highfilled embankment."
Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Vol.24(7): 12311235.
Nakai T, Hinokio M.(2004). "A Simple Elastoplastic Model for Normally and Over
Consolidated Soils with Unified Material Parameters." Soils and Foundations,
Vol.44(2): 5370.
Wang Zhichao, Jiang Mingjing, et al.(2014). "A new method for establishing elasticviscoplastic constitutive model of clay." Geomechanics from Micro to Macro (Proceedings of International Symposium on Geomechanics from Micro to Macro, Cambridge, UK), 699704.
Yao Yangping, Hou Wei, Zhou Annan.(2007). "A Constitutive Model for Overconsolidated Clays Based on the Hvorslev Envelope." Science in China (Ser. E),
Vol.37(11): 14171429.
Zhao Min, Han Shilian, Chen Rongsheng.(1999). "Settlement analysis for airport high
fill concerning material viscoelasticity." China Journal of Highway and Transport,
Vol.12(S1): 2530.
ASCE
209
210
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological Univ., Qingdao 266033, China. Email:
susan.sw@163.com
2
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological Univ., Qingdao 266033, China. Email:
313892957@qq.com
3
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological Univ., Qingdao 266033, China. Email:
897334337@qq.com
4
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological Univ., Qingdao 266033, China. Email:
852469349@qq.com
Abstract: The technology of geosynthetic reinforced soil has been widely used in the structural
strengthening of highway subgrade. It can improve the bearing and deformation resistance
capacity of the subgrade effectively, prolong the service period of the road to ensure the safety
and comfort of the vehicle. So far, the quasistatic method to design the geosynthetic reinforced
subgrade under the action of traffic load is not perfect enough. The study on dynamic property,
design theory and parameters lags far behind the application and improvement of the
geosynthetic reinforced soil technology. This paper used the dynamic triaxial test in laboratory
by taking different kinds of soil (clay and silt), different confining pressure (50kPa, 100kPa, and
150kPa) and different reinforcement layer (0 layer, 1 layer, and 2 layers) to study the change rule
and influence factors of dynamic modulus of elasticity. This study would provide the gist for the
improvement of dynamic design theory and parameter choice of geosynthetic reinforced
subgrade with the effect of traffic load.
Keywords: Dynamic triaxial test; Geosynthetics; Dynamic elasticity modulus.
INTRODUCTION
Traffic load is a kind of special cyclic load with randomness. At present, the main design
method of reinforced soil subgrade engineering under traffic load is pseudo static method, which
is not perfect. This paper adopted the dynamic triaxial test, used the window screening as
geosynthetics to study the dynamic characteristics of reinforced soil under cyclic load. Through
this test to analyze the deformation behavior of reinforced soil subgrade, which would provide
the basis for the design of the reinforced soil under the cyclic load.
Experiment scheme
In this experiment, in order to make the soil sample generate stress and shear stress of cyclic
periodic change, the dynamic stress of periodic change was applied to the soil sample, while its
horizontal axial stress was in a static state.
ASCE
211
Experimental material
Because the mesh of geogrid is largeif the geogrid was used as the reinforced material, the
accuracy of the test could not be guaranteed. In the dynamic characteristics study of the
reinforced soil, the scholars of our country have already used the window screening to replace
the geogrid and achieved the desired results. In addition, the physical parameters of the window
screening and geogrid are similar, so this experiment used the window screening to replace the
geogrid. Table 1 shows the physical parameters of the window screening.
Table 1. Physical parameters of the window screening
Tensile strengthkN/m
Modulus of
Thickness(mm)
elasticity(MPa)
0.755
0.4273
0.22
This experiment used the clay and silt of Qingdao area as the soil samples. Table 2 shows the
physical properties of the two soil samples.
Table 2. Physical properties of the clay and silt
Density
kg/m
Cohesive
strength
kPa
Internal
friction
angle
Poisson
ratio
Modulus of
elasticity
MPa
Plastic
limit
Plasticity
index
clay
1950
45
32
0.35
10
18
17
silt
1800
24
22
0.30
15
26.3
7.6
1.80
1.75
1.75
1.70
Dry Density(g/cm 3 )
Dry Density(g/cm 3 )
The test sample was a kind of remodeling soil sample, its optimum water content and
maximum dry density were determined by the compaction test. Test results are shown in Figure 1
and Table 3.
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.55
1.50
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Water Content(%)
24
26
28
30
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
Water Content(%)
a) Clay
b) Silt
Figure 1. Relationship curves of dry density and water content of two kinds of soil samples
ASCE
212
Table 3. The optimum moisture content and maximum dry density of soil samples
Soil sample
Optimal water content (%)
Maximum dry density(g/cm3)
Clay
17
1.80
Silt
25
1.73
Sample preparation
Prepared the clay and silt of corresponding water content according to the test procedure and
the optimum water content measured by compaction test. The material of the reinforced material
was round of 36mm in diameter, a slightly smaller diameter than the specimen, so as not to
puncture the rubber membrane. For the 1 layer reinforced specimen, the reinforced material was
placed in the middle. 2 layers reinforced specimen, the reinforced materials were placed at the
same distance. The soil surface of the reinforced material was treated by the plane to avoid the
separation between the soil layer, it can also increase the friction between soil and reinforced
material.
Dynamic triaxial test parameters
DDS70 type microcomputer controlled electromagnetic vibration three axis instrument was
chosen for this test. In the experiment, the dynamic load was simulated by the sine load, and the
vibration frequency was 1.0Hz. According to the "Foundation dynamic characteristics test code"
(GB/ T5026997), the sum of elastic deformation and plastic deformation is 5%, which is the
failure criterion of the specimen. The test operationed under the condition of consolidation and
undrainage, consolidation stress ratio Kc=1.0. Table 4 shows the test parameters.
Table 4. Dynamic triaxial test parameters
ConsoliType of soil
dation
ratio
Clay
50
100 150
0
1
2
1.0
1.0
Silt
50
100 150
0
1
2
1.0
1.0
As the default load unit of the dynamic triaxial test system is N, the unit need to be convert
firstly. Due to the isotropic consolidation, under three kinds of confining pressure, the maximum
loading it can bear as follows:
Confining
pressurekPa
Reinforcement
layer
d2
4
= 0.8 0.05
3.14 39.12
N = 48N
4
ASCE
Frequenc
y(Hz)
213
F = 0.8 100kPa
d2
4
= 0.8 0.1
3.14 39.12
N = 96N
4
d2
4
= 0.8 0.15
3.14 39.12
N = 144 N
4
According to the calculation results, Table 5 shows the maximum and minimum values of the
test load.
Table 5. The maximum and minimum of the dynamic load rating
Confining pressure
50
100
150
(kPa)
40
90
140
Maximum (N)
4
9
14
Minimum(N)
Installed the sample according to the test requirements after the sample preparation was
finished. Carried out the vibration test after the test system was zeroed and the test soil samples
were drained and consolidated. The vibration load of 1Hz was applied to the sample until it was
damaged.
Test result analysis
Effect of different soil on dynamic elastic modulus
160
50kPa Clay
50kPa Silt
100kPa Clay
100kPa Silt
150kPa Clay
150kPa Silt
140
120
80
60
120
100
80
60
40
40
20
20
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
d
0.01
aPlain soil
ASCE
140
E d(Mpa)
Ed (Mpa)
100
0.1
50kPa Clay
50kPa Silt
100kPa Clay
100kPa Silt
150kPa Clay
150kPa Silt
160
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
d
d1 layer
0.01
0.1
214
180
50kPa Clay
50kPa Silt
100kPa Clay
100kPa Silt
150kPa Clay
150kPa Silt
160
140
120
E d(Mpa)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.0001
0.00001
0.001
0.01
0.1
c2 layers
Figure 2. Relationship curve of dynamic elastic modulus and dynamic strain under
different soil conditions
From Figure 2, it can be seen that under the same conditions, the influence factors of the
reinforcement layer and the confining pressure were the same, the dynamic elastic modulus and
dynamic strain of silt and clay were decreased with the increase of the dynamic strain. At the
same level of dynamic strain, the dynamic elastic modulus of silty soil was higher than that of
the clay in the small strain period. The Ed~d curve of two soil samples gradually tended to be
consistent when the dynamic strain was greater than 0.01.
Effect of the number of layers on the dynamic elastic modulus
Plain soil 50kPa
One layer 50kPa
Two layers 50kPa
Plain soil 100kPa
One layer 100kPa
Two layers 100kPa
Plain soil 150kPa
One layer 150kPa
Two layers 150kPa
120
E d(Mpa)
100
80
60
180
160
140
120
100
E d(Mpa)
140
80
60
40
40
20
20
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
d
0.01
0.1
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
d
0.01
0.1
aClay
bSilt
Figure 3. Relationship curves of dynamic elastic modulus and dynamic strain under
different reinforcement conditions
From Figure 3, it can be seen that the dynamic elastic modulus of the reinforced soil and the
plain soil all reduced with the increase of the dynamic strain. The reinforcement had little effect
on the relationship between the dynamic elastic modulus and the dynamic strain. The effect of
improving the dynamic elastic modulus of embankment fill was not obvious.
ASCE
215
120
E d(Mpa)
100
80
60
180
160
140
120
100
Ed (Mpa)
140
80
60
40
40
20
20
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
aClay
0.01
0.1
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
d
0.01
0.1
bSilt
Figure 4. Relationship curves between dynamic elastic modulus and dynamic strain
under different confining pressures
From Figure 4, it can be seen that the relationship curves of dynamic elastic modulus and
confining pressure of different kinds of soil samples were similar: The dynamic elastic modulus
of soil samples increased with the increase of confining pressure under the certain condition of
dynamic strain amplitude. In small strain range, within d 103, the effect of confining pressure
on soil dynamic elastic modulus was significant. After the dynamic strain of d >103, the effect
of confining pressure on soil dynamic elastic modulus decreased obviously.
CONCLUSIONS
(1) The dynamic elastic modulus of plain soil and reinforced soil decreased with the increase of
the dynamic strain while increased with the increase of confining pressure. The effect of
reinforcement on the dynamic elastic modulus of embankment was small.
(2) Under certain conditions, such as the reinforcement and the confining pressure, the
relationship curves of dynamic elastic modulus and dynamic strain of silt and clay were the same.
Dynamic elastic modulus of silty soil was higher than that of clay in the case of small strain, the
Ed~d relationship curves of the two kinds of soil samples gradually tended to be consistent
when the dynamic strain was greater than 0.01.
REFERENCES
Sun Jin. and Bai Xiaohua. and Zeng Guohong. (2006). "Dynamic triaxial testing study on
dynamic Elasticity Modulus of reinforced soil". Chinese Hydraulic Engineering. The first
session of China's water resources and hydropower in geotechnical mechanics and engineering
academic conference on (part ii).Chinese Hydraulic Engineering.Vol.2006 (3).905907.
Yang Yan. and Bo Shu. and Zhang Jun.(2009). "Dynamic triaxial testing study on reinforced
soil." The subgrade engineering, Vol. 2009 (5):178179.
ASCE
ASCE
216
217
ASCE
218
Both the bilinear models consider that the soil experiences purely elastic
deformation during recompression and elastoplastic deformation when the stress state
moves on to the normal compression curve. Consideration of purely elastic
deformation during recompression leads to an assumption that the deformation in a
soil mass occurs only because of elastic deformation of individual clay particles or
particle groups during this stage. As a result, possibility of the rearrangement of
particles or particle groups due to relative sliding at their contact surfaces during
recompression is completely neglected. However, occurrence of hysteresis during
unloadingreloading stage, which is observed even at low stress level (Houlsby and
Wroth, 1991; Jardin et al., 1984) indicates the possibility of a small amount of plastic
deformation during unloading as well as reloading. Consequently, irrecoverable
deformation due to relative sliding between adjacent particles or particle groups,
though to an extent only, has possibility from beginning of recompression as well. In
such a phenomenon, total strain in a soil mass will be developed partly due to elastic
deformation of individual particles or particle groups and rest of it due to
rearrangement of particles or particle groups. Considering this mechanism, a new
constitutive law for compression response of clayey soil has been proposed in the
following section.
PROPOSED COMPRESSION MODEL
Proposed compression model considers that the clayey soil experiences both elastic
as well as plastic deformation from beginning of the loading irrespective of whether
the stress state is in recompression zone or normally consolidation zone. The total
incremental strain (d) has been considered as summation of the elastic component of
strain (de) and the plastic component of strain (dp).
=
(1)
Elastic Strain
Assuming the elastic behavior of the soil to be linearly pressure dependent
corresponding to a linear relationship in ln(v)  ln() space, the elastic component of
strain, de,, can be expressed in incremental form as,
(2)
ASCE
(3)
219
(
(
)(
(4)
Hence, from Eqs. (3) and (4), E can be further expressed as,
=
( )( )
(5a)
where,
( ) =
)(
(
)
)
(5b)
This relationship can be regarded as a form of Hooks law of which the modulus of
elasticity, E, is stress state dependent.
Evolution of Plastic Strain during Virgin Loading
Figure 1 presents schematic representation of compression response of the clayey
soil. In this figure, line ab represents compression response of the soil during
monotonic loading from its initial structure formation, i.e., the soil has been never
unloadedreloaded in the past. This line can be defined as virgin compression line
(VCL). Curve cdef is the compression curve of the same soil which was unloaded
earlier from point g located on VCL to point c. The stress state at point d is defined as
preconsolidation pressure; hence cd can be called as recompression curve. The curve
def represents compression response of soil beyond preconsolidation pressure, which
can be defined as normal compression curve out of which a linear portion at high
stress level (ef) is often defined as normal compression line (NCL) in practice. During
unloadingreloading, the soil experiences certain amount of plastic deformation (gd),
although the stress state may still remain below preconsolidation pressure. This plastic
deformation may result into different spatial arrangement and enlargement of contact
areas of particles or particle groups compared to the virgin loaded soil at the same
stress level. It will carry its impression even if the soil is in normalconsolidation zone,
which leads to reduced amount of the plastic deformation along NCL (gg) than along
VCL (dd) for the same amount of stress increment. The significance of that
impression, however, may reduce with the increase of stress level. As a result, the
loading curve becomes asymptotic to VCL but never actually reaches the same. In the
proposed model, VCL is assumed to be linear in ln(v)  ln() space, which can be
expressed as
ln = ln
ln
(6)
where, n is the slope of VCL, and vn is the value of v on VCL at = 1 kPa. As along
VCL, the soil experiences utmost evolution of incremental plastic strain for a given
ASCE
220
stress incremen
nt, thereforee VCL can be treated as the currve definingg maximum
m
possible evoluttion of plasttic strain an
nd the bounddary of all possible staates for 1D
D
com
mpression.
(7))
Evo
olution of Pllastic Strain
n during Reecompressioon
The
T plastic strain comp
ponent of the soil whiich underweent through unloadingrelo
oading stages in the pastt can be described as a function of stress ratio i = / n,
thatt maps the current
c
stresss state to th
he corresponnding state located on VCL at thee
sam
me specific volume.
v
A material
m
parameter has been introdduced to conntrol the ratee
of elastoplastic
e
c transition of compresssion responnse of the soil. The pllastic strainn
com
mponent in in
ncremental form
f
is defin
ned as,
= (
ASCE
) ( , ))
(8))
221
n will be required to determine the value of i at a given stress level, which can be
determined with Eq. (6) as
(10)
Further, using Eqs. (7), (8) and (9), the plastic strain increment dp as a function of
dpmax can be expressed as
= (
)( )
= ( )
(11)
Eq. (11) yields: for < 1, dp > dpmax, for = 1, dp = dpmax and for > 1, dp < dpmax.
As the plastic strain increment dp for the soil which underwent through unloadingreloading stages in the past, should always be less than dpmax, therefore should
always be greater than unity. Figure 2 shows the variation of eqp with i and , where
eqp = (ne)(i)1. When i tends to zero, eqp will also tend to zero and hence the
contribution of plastic strain component will be negligible. On the other side, when i
tends to one, eqp will also tend to (ne) and dp will be close to dpmax. Figure 2 also
depicts that the rate of elastoplastic transition is gradual for smaller value of and the
transition gets sharper as the value of increases.
MODEL EVALUATION
Determination of Input Parameter
The proposed model has been evaluated for kaolin clay specimen prepared by
consolidating the slurry of kaolin clay at 200 kPa. The Kaolin clay used in this study
has liquid limit of 65%, plastic limit of 30%, plasticity index of 35%, and specific
gravity of 2.60. The proposed model requires three input parameters (e, , and n) to
describe 1D compression response of the soil. All the defined parameters in the
proposed model can be determined from a single 1D consolidation test.
As e represents elastic compressibility of the soil, hence the test which is used to
determine the soil parameter at small strain level will be required to determine e.
However, this is not always possible in usual practice. As the contribution of the
plastic strain component in the total strain at the beginning of the loading is very
small, hence for most of the engineering application, it is reasonable to consider the
initial linear portion of recompression curve to be elastic. Therefore, e can be
determined as the slope of the initial linear portion of the recompression curve. The
value of e for the present test specimen is obtained to be 0.0030. The parameter n,
ASCE
222
slop
pe of VCL, has been deetermined as the slope oof the asympptote drawn on the laterr
partt of the com
mpression cu
urve, which is
i obtained to be 0.081 for the giveen soil. Thee
elasstoplastic paarameter has
h been obttained from best fit currve of the eexperimentall
dataa and for thee given soil itt is obtained
d to be 2.
FIG.
F
2. Varriation of eeqp with i an
nd
FIG. 3. Determina
ation of n aand vn for th
he given soill
ASCE
Model Predictiion
ASCE
223
CONCLUSIONS
In the present paper, a new compression model was proposed to capture the
compression response of clayey soils. The proposed model considers that the
elastoplastic deformation occurs from the beginning of the loading even if the current
stress is much lower than the past stress. The evolution of the plastic strain in the soil
that underwent through unloadingreloading stages in the past was described by a
simple mapping rule. A material parameter was introduced to control the rate of the
elastoplastic transition. All the parameters of the proposed model were readily
estimated by a single 1D consolidation test. The predicted compression response of
the given soil through the proposed model showed its capability of representing the
smooth transition of the compression curve from linear portion of initial part of the
curve to linear portion of later part of the curve.
REFERENCES
Burland, J. (1989). Small is beautiful  the stiffness of soils at small strains.
Canadian Geotechnical Journal., 26, 499516.
Burland, J. (1990). On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays.
Geotechnique., 40(3), 329378.
Butterfield, R. (1979). A natural compression law for soils (an advance on elog p).
Geotechnique., 29(4), 466480.
Haan, E. J. D. (1992). The formulation of virgin compression of soils.
Geotechnique., 42(3), 465483.
Hashiguchi, K. (1995). On the linear relations of V  ln p and ln v  ln p for isotropic
consolidation of soils. International Journal For Numerical And Analytical
Methods in Geomechanics., 19, 367376.
Hardin, B.O. (1989). 1D strain in normally consolidated cohesive soils.
Geotechnique., 115(5), 689710.
Houlsby, G.T., and Wroth, C.P. (1991). The variation of shear modulus of a clay with
pressure and overconsolidation ratio. Soils And Foundations, 31(3), 138143.
Jardine, R.J., Symes, M.J., and Burland, J.B. (1984). The measurement of soil
stiffness in the triaxial apparatus. Geotechnique., 34(3), 323340.
Oikawa, H. (1987). Compression curve of soft soils. Soils And Foundations, 27, 99104.
Roscoe, K. H. and Burland, J. B. (1968). On the generalized stress strain behavior of
wet clay. Engineering plasticity (eds J. Heyman and F. A. Leckie), pp. 535 609.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wesley, L.D. (1988). Compression Index: Misleading parameter? Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE., 114(6), 718723.
Xu, Y., and Xia, X. (2006). Fractal model for virgin compression of pure clays.
Mechanics research communication, Elsevier. 33, 206216.
.
ASCE
224
225
Abstract: This paper aims to assess the numerical predictions of settlement reduction
of compressible soil reinforced by rigid inclusion with experimental results obtained
from experiments conducted in calibration chamber. Loading tests carried out in
calibration chamber are simulated in axisymmetric condition. Numerical computation
focused on settlement variation both for the unreinforced soil and reinforced soil. It
was found the main component of settlement of reinforced soil is quickly stabilized
after loading compared to the settlement of unreinforced soil. Further, the role of
efficiency has been highlighted in showing the benefit of rigid inclusion technique.
INTRODUCTION
The principle of rigid inclusion technique consists of reinforcement of compressible
soils by endbearing vertical inclusions. Each rigid inclusion is headcovered by mini
slab enabling the concentration of induced vertical stress on inclusions. Rigid
inclusion technique comprises three main components: mattress layer, analogic soil
and the rigid inclusion (Brianon 2002). Numerical modeling of scaled test model is
considered in regard to the behavior of mattress layer, the analogical compressible soil
and the rigid inclusion. The numerical study aims to assess the settlement and
efficiency predictions compared to measurements recorded during applied uniform
stress and imposed displacement loadings on the scaled test model. On the basis of
such a validation the behavior of foundations on reinforced soil by rigid inclusions can
be predicted.
In the framework of ASIRI project (2013), two experimental investigations in
laboratory were conducted at CERMES (ENPC, France) by Dinh (2009) and
Boussetta (2013). Those contributions were devoted to quantify the reduction of
settlement due the reinforcement of compressible soil by rigid inclusions after loading
tests performed in calibration chamber. Experimental investigations also served for
parametric studies to highlight the effect of thickness of mattress layer and the cover
ASCE
226
()
()
E (MPa)
(kN/m3)
36
11.4
16.2
Cc
0.35
Cs
0.08
p (kPa)
15
ASCE
227
Axis of
symmetry
Cell border
Rigid Inclusion
Interfaces
(1a)
(1b)
Cmat and mat denote the cohesion and friction angle of mattress layer respectively.
Real interactions between soil and structural elements, for soilsteel interface it is
recommended to take Rint 0.5 because of the weak stiffness of soil compared to that
of rigid inclusion.
ASCE
The top of mattress layer is loaded by increased uniform vertical stress from 0 to 100
kPa. Deformed mesh that resulted from uniform applied load of 100 kPa is shown in
Figure 2.
FIG. 2. Deformed mesh of unit cell model subjected to 100 kPa uniform pressure
NUMERICAL RESULTS
Figure 3 shows the variation of settlement predicted at the unit cell axis and
soil/mattress interface. Significant increase in rate of settlement is observed up to 60
kPa load then the variation of settlement is stabilized from 80 kPa.
228
ASCE
229
230
(r
2
i 1
yyi + yyi 1
(2)
(r
ri 21
(3)
Atot denotes the area of cross section of calibration chamber subjected at the top of
mattress layer to uniform pressure p.
This resultant force is balanced by the distributions of vertical stress at the head of
rigid inclusion and the shear stress exerted on cylindrical border of rigid inclusion
ASCE
231
(Figure 7). Those stress components are taken along section AA* sketched in figure 8
at 2 cm depth with respect to upper level of rigid inclusion.
The variation of efficiency, as calculated from Eq (4), versus applied load is shown
in Figure 9. It is noticed beyond 80 kPa the efficiency becomes constant. The variation
of efficiency, as calculated from Eq (4), versus applied load is shown in Figure 9 (hs
denotes the thickness of compressible soil). It is noticed beyond 80 kPa the efficiency
becomes constant.
Uniform applied stress
2 cm
Shear stress
Rigid inclusion
FIG. 7. Scheme of stresses distribution around the head of rigid inclusion
ASCE
This predicted efficiency from Figure 9 leads to conclude that almost of the load
transfer has occurred on the rigid inclusion. Hence the settlement of reinforced soil is
significantly decreased. As such the expected role of reinforcement using the rigid
inclusion technique is beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS
Boussetta S. (2013) Etude des mcanismes de transfert de charge dans les sols
renforcs par inclusions rigides laide dun modle physique. Thse de doctorat
en gnie civil. Ecole Nationale dIngnieurs de Tunis. Tunisia.
Boussetta S., Bouassida M., Dinh A.Q., Canou J., Dupla J.C., (2012). Physical
modeling of load transfer in reinforced soil by rigid inclusions. Int. J. of Geotech.
Eng. (6), 331341.
Boussetta S., Dinh A.Q., Canou J., Dupla J.C. et Bouassida M. (2010). Etude
exprimentale sur modle physique dun sol compressible renforc par une
inclusion rigide. 2nd Int. Conf. on Geotech. Eng. October 2527, 2010, Tunisia:
255264.
Brianon, L. (2002). Renforcement des sols par inclusions rigides Etat de
lart en France et ltranger. IREX, Paris, 185 p.
Brinkgreve R.B.T., and Vermeer, P.A., (1998) Plaxis Finite Element Code for Soil
and Rocks Analysis. Version 8, AA. Balkema, Rotterdam Brookfield.
Dinh A.Q. (2009). Etude sur modle physique des mcanismes de transfert de charge
dans les sols renforcs par inclusions rigides. Application au dimensionnement.
Thse de doctorat. Ecole des ponts ParisTech. France.
ASCE
232
233
Abstract: The paper briefly reviews research investigations conducted on Tunis soft
clay that is classified as problematic soil. Results obtained from an experimental study
carried out on undisturbed Tunis soft clay specimens are presented and interpreted. On
the basis of experimental results the paper discusses which constitutive law can
describe at best the observed behaviour of Tunis soft clay. The elastoplastic behaviour
modelled by the hardening soil model (HSM) is then justified upon the validation of
numerical results of oedometer and triaxial tests carried out on undisturbed soft clay
specimens.
Keywords: Behavior; Characterization; Hardening; Numerical; Simulation; Soft clay.
INTRODUCTION
The soil profile of Tunis City mainly consists of a layer located between 3 and 20m
depth constituted by saturated greyish sandy clay, which is at the origin of the
contamination observed on several constructions built on this weak soil. This soil
commonly called the Tunis soft clay (TSC) is very problematic because of the
difficulty to extract undisturbed specimens for performing laboratory tests. Besides,
performing in situ tests sometimes leads to unrealistic data due to its very low stiffness
compared to that of expanded membrane to measure the limit pressure during
pressuremeter tests.
Bouassida (2006) reported the difficulty in predicting the undrained cohesion of TSC
from in situ vane shear tests due to unreasonable interpretation of these results. In
parallel, the use of reconstituted TSC to avoid disturbance of specimens does not
reflect the actual behaviour of in situ soil (Klai & Bouassida, 2009). An overview on
geotechnical parameters of TSC and related correlations were suggested by
(Bouassida and Klai, 2012). In this paper, a comparison was made between the
characteristics of reconstituted and undisturbed TSC.
Relevant contribution on numerical modeling of TSC was proposed by Tounekti et al
(2008). Those authors assessed the usefulness of soft soil model (SSM) as suitable
constitutive law for the remolded Tunis soft clay after comparisons between numerical
results (simulation of oedometer and triaxial tests) and measurements from performed
tests in laboratory. The behavior of two geotechnical infrastructures has been
ASCE
discussed on the basis of numerical simulation where the SSM was adopted for TSC.
The present paper focuses on the study of behavior of TSC as observed from
experimental investigation conducted in laboratory. A set of identification tests,
oedometer and triaxial tests has been performed on samples extracted during
geotechnical investigation in Tunis City. From experimental data the soil parameters
of hardening soil model (HSM) and modified Cam Clay (CCM) constitutive law are
determined and, then, used as input data to simulate oedometer and triaxial tests. The
validation of those constitutive models is discussed based on the comparison made
between experimental and numerical results.
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SAMPLING AND LABORATORY
TESTS
In the urban area of Tunis City two bore holes namely BH1 and BH2 spaced of 10 m
were executed at the Avenue de la Rpublique. Cored specimens namely CS1 and
CS2 have been extracted respectively at 7.5 m and 9.5 m depths by a double rotary
driller of external diameter 101 mm.
 BH1 soil profile shows an upper fill layer of 7 m thickness overlaying the Tunis soft
clay layer of about 18 m thickness. Three undisturbed cored specimens (specimen 1,
specimen 2, and specimen 3) have been extracted at depths of 7.55 m, 9.85 m and
18.35 m respectively.
 BH2 soil profile shows a similar formation as that observed in BH1. Thickness of
the upper fill layer is 2.5 m. Two cored specimens (specimen 4 and specimen 5) have
been extracted at depths of 3.75 m and 7.75 m respectively.
Undisturbed samples are cored in PVC tubes of 101 mm external diameter, logged in
the rotary driller gently penetrated within soft clay layer at displacement rate of about
10 mm/minute. Extracted PVC tubes are then placed in wood boxes and transported
from the site to laboratory so that shocks are prevented.
In laboratory, undisturbed soil specimens are extracted by penetrated thin cutting shoe
in the direction of insitu extraction. Therefore, from extracted cutting shoe, soft soil
specimens are ready for laboratory tests. Laboratory tests have been carried out at the
soil mechanics laboratory of the Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades
(Tunis). The soil identification tests included: grain size distribution (sieve and
hydrometer), total unit weight, specific gravity, Atterberg limits and content of organic
wastes (OM). The second group of tests included oedometer tests (compressibility and
consolidation), consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial tests and consolidated drained
(CD) triaxial tests.
Experimental investigation: tests and results
Classification tests
As part of soil identification wet sieve and hydrometer analyses were performed on
five undisturbed soft clay specimens. Grain size distributions show the average fines
content (grain size < 0.08 mm) is about 87% (Klai, 2014). Table 1 summarizes the
identification parameters of the five undisturbed soft clay specimens. The
classification of saturated Tunis soft clay is highly plastic silt with very low
consistency. For undisturbed soft clay specimens, which contain wastes of shell,
ASCE
234
235
Atterbergs limits values are lower than those obtained for the reconstituted Tunis soft
clay (Bouassida, 2006).
Table 1. Identification parameters of undisturbed Tunis soft clay
Specimen N
1
2
3
4
5
Specific gravity
2.62
2.50
2.53
2.32
2.39
[kN/m3]
17.4
16.1
18
17.6
16.9
WL
46
50
51
65
79
Ic
0.31
0.50
0.72
0.50
0.50
Ip
19
5
9.5
15
29
Cc
0.43
0.485
0.35
0.385
0.384
Cs
0.057
0.056
0.057
0.057
0.057
p (kPa)
12
25
17
14
14
ASCE
236
Ccu (kPa)
7.53
8.49
8.67
7.79
C(kPa)
5.0
4.0
5.1
3.6
()
22.7
23.7
20.8
19.2
Justification of the Hardening Soil Model (HSM) for Tunis Soft Clay
The HSM is selected to simulate the behaviour of Tunis soft clay since it is capable to
account for the increase in stiffness due to consolidation stress. Such parameter is
essential for the modelling of foundation that extends to relatively deep soil layers for
example underneath an embankment. Zimmerman et al (2010) recommended the
adoption of the standard HSM for normally consolidated soft clays. Relationships
between the parameters of the HSM are:
ref
ref
E ref
= 100 kPa , K 0nc = 1 sin R f = 0.9 t = 0 m = 1 ; = 0.
ur = 3E50 ; ur = 0.35 ; P
;
;
;
From recorded experimental data the input parameters of HSM adopted for Tunis soft
clay layer are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Hardening soil model parameters of Tunis Soft Clay
Specimen N
(extraction depth)
1 (7.2 to 7.9 m)
2 (9.5 to 10.2 m)
3 (18 to 18.7 m)
4 (3.3 to 4.0 m)
ref
E oed
(kPa)
1337
1186
1643
1494
ref (kPa)
E 50
1672
1482
2054
1867
C(kPa)
()
5.0
4.0
5.1
3.6
22.7
23.7
20.8
19.2
ASCE
FIG. 1. Predicted behaviour of TSC modeled by the HSM and CCM and
experimental measurements from oedometer test (specimen 1)
FIG. 2. Predicted behaviour of TSC modeled by the HSM and CCM and
experimental measurements from oedometer test (specimen 2)
ASCE
237
238
Interpretation of results
From Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 it is noted that the numerical prediction by the HSM
during the primary consolidation phase is overall in accordance with the observed
behaviour on tested specimens. In turn, significant difference is noticed between
experimental data and the numerical predictions obtained by the Modified Cam Clay
model (CCM) that overestimates the predicted decrease in void ratio. The difference in
drained cohesion between the HSM (C = 3 to 5 kPa) and the CCM (C = 13 kPa) can
also explain the lower compression observed in oedometer test due to the higher overconsolidation considered by the CMM compared to that of HSM.
FIG. 3. Predictions by the HSM of TSC behaviour compared with data from
oedometer test (specimen 3)
1.4
1.2
Void ratio
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
11
10
100
ASCE
ASCE
239
the hardening soil and modified Cam Clay models (HSM and CCM). Comparisons
between numerical results from the simulation of oedometer and triaxial tests favoured
the adoption of the HSM for TSC in order to predict the behaviour of structures
founded on typical soil profile comprising the soft clay layer when subjected to
vertical loading. Recently, Klai et al (2015) investigated on the numerical predictions
of behaviour using the hardening soil and MohrCoulomb models of tank resting on
Tunis soft clay reinforced by sand columns to highlight the significant reduction in
settlement.
REFERENCES
Bouassida M. and Klai M. (2012). Challenges and Improvement Solutions of Tunis
Soft Clay. Int. Journal of Geomate, Sept. 3 (1), 296305.
Bouassida M. (2006). Modeling the behaviour of soft clays and new contributions for
soil improvement solutions. Keynote Lecture. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. On
Problematic Soils. December 35th 2006. Ptain Jaya, Salengro, Malaysia.
Editors Bojan, Pinto & Jefferson, 112.
Klai, M., Bouassida, M. and Tabchouche S. (2015). Numerical modelling of Tunis soft
clay. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA Vol. 46 No. 4, 8795.
Klai, M. 2014, On the behaviour of Tunis soft clay Application to the study of
foundations stability (in French). PhDs Nat. Eng. School of Tunis. Tunisia.
Klai M. and Bouassida M. (2009) Comparison between behaviour of undisturbed and
reconstituted Tunis soft clay 2nd International Conference on New
Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2830 May,
Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
Touati L., Bouassida M. and Van Impe W. (2009). Discussion on the Tunis soft clay
sensitivity. Geotechnical Geological Engineering Journal. Vol 27, 631643.
Tounekti, F., Klai, M., Bouassida, M. and Marzougi, I. (2008). Etude exprimentale
en vue dun modle de comportement pour la vase de Tunis. Revue Franaise
de Gotechnique. N114, 2536.
Zimmermann, T., Truty E. and Podles K. (2010). Numerics in geotechnics and
structures. Elmepress international.
ASCE
240