Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concept of Reorganisation
ONGC
a
r
I
series of
towards
tbe
achieve'
work
together
they
that
componenrs so interfaced and inter-related
to
convey
an
not
meant
is
This
definition
ment of objectives of the enterprise.
in
to
done
a
what
needs
be
as
to
organisation free of stress, differences of opinion
viable
in
imply
that,
any
it
does
But
specific situation, or even outright conflict.
organisation, these differences are effectively managed so that tbere is a reasonable unity
of tbrust within tbe various organisational components. Although the idea of an
organisation as a system refers to tbe functional whole, it is also clear that the vitality
or effectiveness of this system is dependent upon a series of highly interdependent
elements. For ease and convenience this 'concept' includes the whole array of semiautonomous'profi t centres'.
An 'Organisation'
There are times in the history of any institution rvhen wbat seems needed is a
overhaul, a marked charge in the strategic structure of the organisation. Implict in this
structural change are important changes in the relationships among individuals and
groups. The reporting relationsbips of some organisational components may be changed,
the influence of other may be enhanced or lessened-but, in any event, there are
recognisable changes in roles. In short, a rnajor, significant organisational change is one
that modifies the strategy of the enterprise, alters the structure, necessitates the development of a different character of relationships among the principal components of the
organisation and dictates a change in management mode. But it should be borne in
mind that this kind of change does not postulate an 'eartbquake'. Such a change
includes more specification in the area of goals, objectives and targets; increased
organisational effectiveness through new grouping of functional activities; guidelines for
delegation of authority, and improved relationships, vertical and borizontal, vital to the
success of the planned cbanges.
The Sixth Five Year Plan for ONGC envisages a production target of 89.87 million
tonnes of oil, 10878 million cubicmetres of gas, 6,1732A totrnes of LPG and 100,000
tonnes
of
Ca/Cc.
and objectives and the long range plans of ONGC and also the expectations from ONGC
of the societal segments like Govt. Community, Industries etc, is nothing short of 'self-
2
The last 're-organisation', or 'restructuring' of the Commission was in 1974-75
during the time of the tben Chairman, Shri N.B. Prasad. The Report of the Committee
for Review of the Oil & Natural Gas Commission headed by late Shri K.D. Malaviya
U972lhad higblighted that since 1963, there had been progressive deterioration in the
performance of the Commission. Conservative finance procedures ill informed audit
objections, bureaucratic methods adopted by the administrative machinery and inappropriate selection procedures for the top posts had all contributed to the poor performance.
The Committee also noted tlrat self reliance, which was the spirit of ONGC at its inception, had eroded in mid-sixties. The consequent 're-organisation' exercise included
some recommendations of the Malaviya Committee and some revised ideas by tbe then
Commission Members, Chairman and Ministry. This reorganised "Commission' started
functioning effectively in 1975.
'f
:!
\+.ri
of Hydrocarbons offshore in
of the resources of the Commission were diverted there which resulted in
little attention being paid to the on-shore areas, This also encouraged a 'territorial' type
of management with priority treatment to offshore and a slorv tempo of exploration
onshore. Due to a 'barrier' that developed between onshore and offshore, the exposure
to the new technology was confined only to a few people. Moreover, in the absence of
any long range corporate planning and resultant micro-pianning, adequate conceptual
plans were not developed. There had been no technicai auditing and quality monitoring
This reorganisation took into account the discovery
(c)
total effectiveness of exploration [tonnesimetre] has gone down and has risen
oniy in 1980 with discovery of Soutb Bassein and R-7 but still lower tban what
it rvas at tbe time of discovery of Bombay High;
(d)
(e)
percentage
of
v,.
J.
(f)
of initial geological reserves bas gone down from 0.90/6 fi A35a/o. [The world
figure for this is 2)( Russia/Americal.
the percentage of flowing oil well to the total oil wells is very low. The world
figure is aboutg}/o as compared to 46.5/" at tbe end of 1980.
second
is thus clear that for the targets now laid dorvn for the 6tb Five Year Plan, the
preseot organisational structure will not be able to match up to the required massive
It
ar
exploration push.
-to
country's hydrocarbon
-consistent
to maximise
production profile
of oil
and gas.
up relevant
-buitd
areas of exploration
ttt
-toapplied to oPtimise
-marketing
gains.
of petroleum products.
.SWOT' ANALYSIS
Keeping the above goals and objectives in view,
opportunity profile emerges using the SWOT Analysis :
srRENSIgg
l.
2.
3.
4.
5. Availability of plant and equipment facilities.
6, Support and back-up of a most powerful organisation, i e. Government of India.
7, Large infra'structure and reasonable technological base available in the country.
8. Good image of ONGC at home and abroad.
9. We are in a business which has punch and power.
10. Acquisition of latest tecbnology.
1
;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
and equipment-Weak
accent
Jt
OPPORTUNITIES
1.
2.
3.
4.
r
5.
1"
{}
of indigenous
energy
sources.
6.
THREATS
1..
Competition
by Foreign Oil
Companies
to
explore
in Indian
sedimentary
basins.
2.
in
Assam resulting
in
lower
production.
High cost and non-availability of specialised equipment and facilities.
bxternal financial assistance may shrink.
Demand constraints in the Eastern Region.
3.
4.
5.
'rg. Political instability abroad as in lraq, Iran etc.
. 7. Extension of the economic zone to offshore areas.
8. Danger of obsolescence due to fast growth of technology.
9. Brain Drain.
10. Vulnerability of offsbore area to external threats. '
s,
"
1
-
KEYRESULT
AREAS
\'
The first 'charge' on exploration will be the replacement of currently exploited oil
reserves. Thus the task for Exploration will be :
new
by
6
(a)
the annual
(b) Discover additional oil at a supportable cost in the real economic environment
of tbe period covered by tbe exploration plan;
(c) Prepare the areas with more expensive exploration costs for future operations
(i.e. when the higher prices justify higher risks ard costs.)
\)
During 1981-82, 12 Geological Survey parties, 35 Seismic survey patties, 5 gravitymagnetic survey parties were planned to operate onshore. Onshore drilling programme
.ouir"g.r drilling of 102 wells with a meterage of 237.7 thousand and production of
5.10 million tonnes of oil and 815 miilion cubic metres of gas. Offshore, 20500line
kms. of seismic surveys, drilling of 5l wells with a metreage of 107.6 thousand and
production of 8.40 million tonnes of oil, 605 million cubic metres of gas and 82,120
iooo.r of LPG are planned. Plan outlay both for Onshore and Offshore during the
current Year is Rs. 816'43 crores'
Member (Onshore)
a.
is
assisted by
negionl report
to him. In
),.
1.
to him.
Member (Offshore)
offshore operations. He is based at Bombay. In dis'
is assisted by three General Managers [Operations,
be
his reponsibilities,
charge of
Production and Construction].
@t
At
4-
L-
\v
e..
5.
Member lMaterials]
is a
headquarters
For R&D support there are three Research Institutes. The Institute of Petroleum
Exploration is located at Dehra f)un and is beaded by a Senior Director. Institute for
Reservoir Studies, which is located at Ahmedabad, is headed by a Director. Third
institute is coming up at Dehra Dun for Drilling Technology. This is headed by a
Senior Director.
Chairman, full-time Members IExcept Member Offshore] and functional Director are
based at headquarters at Dehra Dun. Regional offices are located at Baroda for Western Region, Nazira for Eastern Region, Calcutta for Central Region, Bombay for
Bombay offshore Project.
During the process of developing the restructuring concept the organisation structures of various international Oil Companies were studied. Suggestions given by Members, Directors and others were also taken into consideration, Discussions were also
held with Members and Directors. This 'concept' is translated into a chart placed at
Annexure C. The concept was also presented in the Commission meeting held on l2th
November, 198 l.
The Commission will be headed by a Chairman who will be the Chief Executive,
There will be six functional Members, one each responsible for Exploration, Drilling,
Technical, Operations, Personnel, Finance; thus taking care of the total gamut of oil
Exploration and Exploitation. The remaining two Members will be the representatives
of Ministries of Petroleum and Finance [Part time].
The Exploration, Drilling, Technical uol oo..ur"ns will act as Business groups and
will be the profit centres, supported by Personnel & Finance functions.
t)
Chairman will also have under him the Corporate Planning function and International Operations wbich will be controlled through Hydrocarbons India Limited.
the basis of
These
provided.
Directors
will
with
be
been
delegated
have''
areas of responsibilities,
Powers.
Financial
and
Administrative
the necessary
The three existing research institutes, namely, IPE, IRS, IDT and the proposed
Design group have been appropriated to tbe corresponding Business groups. Institutionalised budget provision for R & D activity in respect of futuristic and long term
objectives will be made for the research Institutes. For other activities, the Institutes
will generate their own funds by working as profit centres.
Various Executive Directors will be assisted by Directors and General Managers
with appropriate responsibility, autbority and accountability. Responsibility and
commensurate authority will be delegated down the line in various Business Groups.
Based on the Corporate Plan, micro planning will be carried out by individual
functional members. These micro-plans will be rolled into a performance budget for
action. Within the concept described, the whole process of exploration and exploitation
will be gone tbrough. Various individual functional set-up distributing workload have
been put on charts and annexed at D. As the main theme is on development
of functional expertise, diversion in growth to general management will be from the
superintending level only. The responsibilities of general management will be so
the General Managers
designeO as not to ear the growtb of line expertise. As such,
will not have a say in technical/scientific decisions involved in the operations. Such
technical and scientific decisions will only be taken by the superior in the technical or
scientific stream. Both General Managers and Technical stream will converge at the
Executive Director's level.
Apart from above business centres the field survey parties, electrologging groups
under Member (Expl.), cementing, DST, workover and stimulation under Member
ibrilling) will also work as separate sub-units profit centres. These sub-units can be
i
-{}
at
Exploration for oil is capital intensive and requires sophisticated and complex
machinery most of which is imported. Advancement in technology, metallurgy, constructional toleranceso degree of conformity, has made equipment worthy to stand increasingly severe conditions in oil drilling. Today, operational life, profitability and reliability
of machines and mechanism in general, are rarely limited by break-down or defect of
parts. Improved material performance, modern fatigue calculating methods and techniques of controlling parts are continuously eliminating serious accidents. On the
other hand, mechanisms are limited in their life span and performance by maintenance
failure consequently wear. The essential functions of maintenance are to eliminate/
reduce down time by avoiding/preventing immobilisation of the machine.
Similariy considerable strides of advancement have been made in improved maintenance technology and systems. What to speak of introduction of advanced technology
of maintenance even the basics of maintenance are missing in the Organisation. The
brief guidelines suggested by BPE pertaining to maintenance wbich are as below are
also not taken care of in the Organisation
:-
(b)
(c) In
maintenance policy and the policy has to be reviewed from time to time.
+
*
(e) System should be developed to collect annual maintenance costs of each equipment in order to recognise the point of time when it is likely to become uneconomical
to maintain further and to require replacement.
(f)
of
spare parts
should be deveioped.
(g) Training courses should be organisgd for maintenance, staff and supervisors
on a systematic and sustained basis.
An
awareness needs
to be created that
maintenancs aspect
of the
equipment
from the
design
stage. There is, therefore, need to involve top level maintenance Engineers froo the
planning and equipment ordering stage. This would ensure maintenance eflectiveness.
10
problem will be tackled by the individual business groups as far as possible, but in areas
where more than one group are operating and if there is a commonality in the problem
this will have to be taken care of by Operations Group which is the Repository"
However, if the problem is beyond the Operation Group it will have to be taken care
of by Member (Per.) himself.
Although material function has been decentralised amongst various business groups
for uniformity the guidelines will be provided by Member (Technical). The inventory
control will be the responsibility of the individual business groups but uniform guidelines
on this will also be provided by ldember (Technical) under whom a small centralised
inventory group will function.
,-)
rl
1