Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rating:
Magdaraog, Klein
Sequitin, Camille Andrea
Yap, Michael Adrian
Objective
To calculate the difference between the theoretical discharge (using the formula) and the
actual discharge
To state the importance of a hydraulic jump
Materials/Equipment
a) Tilting Flume
b) Water Container
c) Graduated Cylinder
d) Ruler
e) Flowing Tap Water
f) Timer
Theory
Sketch
Sequence of Operations
1. Determine the dimensions of the apparatus.
2. Supply a constant flow of water in a tilting flume.
3. Measure the uniform depth of water throughout the channel (d2) and the depth at its lowest point.
(d1)
Computation
d 1+d 2+d 3
3
Dave1 =
1.08+1.30+ 1.23
3
= 1.20 cm
d 1+d 2+d 3
3
Dave2 =
1.92+1.94 +1.86
3
= 1.91 cm
q2
g
q=
(0.0120)(0.0191)(.0120+ 0.0191)(9.81)
2
q = 5.89x10-3 m2/s
QT = qb
= (5.89x10-3)(0.0538)
QT = 3.1688x10-4 m3/s
QA =
VOL.
TIME
QA =
4.63 x 103
10.26
QA =
4.510 x 10
AT
T
%diff =
m3/s
x 100%
Data Gathered
Tabulation of Data
Group
Qactual
1
0.4510
2
0.06735
3
0.1036
4
0.08316
5
0.1082
Qtheoretical
0.31688
0.1454
0.02762
0.1220
0.1191
% Discrepancy
42.33
53.68
73.34
31.84
9.152
5. Make sure to measure the volume of water collected accurately and avoid spillage while
measuring to produce accurate results.
6. In performing calculations, double checking is desirable in order to avoid miscalculations
and typographical errors.
Conclusion
The hydraulic jump is a phenomenon present in our daily lives. It can be observed in
sinks, tubs, lakes, rivers, dams as well as many other places and is suitable for reversing the flow
of water which is used for purifying water and chemical mixing, increasing the water level in
canals which is beneficial for irrigations and a lot more. In this experiment, we were able to
observe hydraulic jump in an open channel. By determining the measurement of the height of
water in the supercritical flow area and the subcritical flow area and also the discharge in given
time, we can compute for the theoretical discharge which is 3.1688x10 -4 m3/s with an actual
discharge of 4.510x10-4 m3/s which lead on to a discrepancy of 42.33%.