Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Aon Hewitt 2011 Talent Survey results build on these findings and emphasize the role that
employee engagement plays in driving business resultsboth failures and successes. Our 2011
respondents report that engagement continues to be low, and employees have become myopic,
more focused on their personal situation and less concerned with what they can do to help
the company succeed. And, we see a striking lack of confidence in leaders ability to deliver on the
factors that will steer their organization in the right direction and motivate a disengaged workforce.
What can organizations do to re-ignite the passion of their workforces and create a high-performance
culture that will spark and sustain recovery?
Reinstating programs that have been cut and getting back to normal will simply yield middle-ofthe-road results. We are challenged to create a new normal. We must be bolder, more aggressive,
nimble, and, in many ways, smarter about how we manage our employees. Fresh ideas, new
approaches, and rapid alignment strategies will lead to greater market share. The race to the new
normal will create winners, as well as recession casualties.
Aon Hewitts 2011 Talent Survey examines what organizations are doing today and what they plan to
do in the future as they embark on efforts to re-engage workers and provide meaningful reasons for
them to stay. In doing so, they will build stronger, more resilient, more innovative, more productive
and more fun organizations.
We hope these findings are helpful to your organization as you focus on building a strong future with
a highly engaged workforce.
Sincerely,
Kathryn J. Hayley
Chief Executive Officer
Consulting Americas
Aon Hewitt
Contents
3 2011 Talent Survey Executive Summary
9 Engagement Findings:
Engagement Drives Passion and Productivity
17 Leadership Findings:
The New Normal Demands New Leadership
21 Talent Acquisition Findings:
Focus on Quality New Employees over Quantity
27 Next-Generation Communication Findings:
Communication in the New Age of Employee
Engagement, Recruitment, and Productivity
31 Survey Data
Summary of Findings
Engagement Drives Passion The economic challenges of the past three years have significantly impacted
and Productivity organizations ability to deliver on their employer-employee contract.
Employee engagement is at an all-time low. And yet, for the past two years,
retention levels have been at an all-time high, driven in large part by
a close to 10% U.S. unemployment rate. With fewer companies hiring,
consolidation of businesses and processes, off-shoring, outsourcing,
and fewer mature employees leaving the workforce, many employees
have become reluctant to stray from their current employer.
As the economy shows signs of recovery, employees will begin to consider
greener pastures. What happens if theres a mass exodus of key talent
just as an organization is moving toward recovery? Organizational leaders
are concerned and engagement strategies are a reported priority.
Key Findings:
n
Engagement levels are low and there is a lack of confidence that leaders
can retain their critical talent.
n
Aon Hewitt
The New Normal Demands Talented, effective, creative, and respected leaders have a dramatic impact
New Leadership on employee engagement, innovation, and profitability. In an economic
environment where change is the norm, leaders are finding themselves
ill-equipped to adapt and become a catalyst for change. In this years
survey, one striking finding is the perceived lack of leaders effectiveness
in delivering on the success factors that are critically important.
Key Findings:
n
Focus on Quality New Employees With job cuts and unemployment stabilizing, and business recovery on
over Quantity the horizon, HR executives can look toward strategically growing their
workforces. Forty-five percent of respondents anticipate slightly to
significantly greater hiring volumes than in the past year. Only 16% of
the responding organizations anticipate slightly or significantly less
hiring this year compared to last. Respondents also report an increased
focus on the quality of candidates, citing a priority for more productive
employees. With those directives, the shrunken talent acquisition function
must be bolstered with the required employees to match business demand.
Key Findings:
n
Communication in the New Age Most respondents agree that their organizations value the role that
of Employee Engagement, communication plays in engagement and retention; they also agree that
Recruitment, Productivity they are not very good at it. Most acknowledge that their communications
could be more effective at impacting employee behavior. They also report
a wait-and-see approach to social media tools, with only 16% of
organizations investing in this area.
Key Findings:
n
Participant Demographics
Organization Size
>5000
27%
500-5000
39%
<500
34%
Respondent Title
C-Suite
17%
Director
38%
Manager
28%
Professional
14%
Support
3%
Aon Hewitt
Respondents by Industry
Industry
Percentage
1%
0%
1%
Construction
2%
Educational Services
5%
Federal Government
1%
11%
10%
Information
1%
1%
Manufacturing
18%
0%
Not-for-Profit
6%
7%
2%
Retail Trade
4%
5%
Technology
6%
Telecommunications
2%
2%
Utilities
3%
8%
Aon Hewitt
Engagement Findings:
Engagement Drives Passion and Productivity
The economic challenges of the past three years have significantly impacted
organizations ability to deliver on their employer-employee contract.
Employee engagement is at an all-time low. And yet, retention levels have
been at an all-time high for the past two years, driven in large part by
a close to 10% U.S. unemployment rate. With fewer companies hiring,
consolidation, off-shoring, outsourcing, and fewer employees retiring,
many have become reluctant to stray from their current employer.
Key Findings
Engagement levels are low and there is a lack of confidence that leaders
can retain their critical talent.
n
Engagement of critical talent Retaining and engaging the workforce is a business-critical focus coming
is a top concern out of the global recession, with more than half of the leaders rating them
as two of their top three concerns:
n
10
Aon Hewitt
Area of Concern
Percentage
Aging workforce/retirements
9%
18%
10%
Engagement of employees
16%
Leading change
6%
31%
Succession planning
8%
Other
3%
Engagement levels are low and there When asked about their employees current level of engagement, 45% of
is a lack of confidence that leaders can employers dont believe that their employees are focused on the job,
retain critical talent 43% dont feel that their employees are immersed fully in their work, and
40% dont believe that their employees are driven to do whatever it
takes to do their jobs.
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
15%
52%
22%
10%
1%
22%
64%
11%
3%
0%
7%
50%
31%
12%
0%
6%
49%
34%
11%
0%
11%
50%
30%
9%
1%
11
The respondents of Aon Hewitts 2010 Engagement 2.0 Study echo this
concern and provide clear evidence that the actions taken during the
global recession have impacted employee engagement. Theres a chink
in the foundation of the employer-employee relationship:
n
64% are physically exhausted when they get home from work
83% agree that senior leaders play a very or extremely important role
in retaining talent
n
Less than one-third feel that leaders are very effective in hiring more
productive employees
n
12
Aon Hewitt
Total rewards plays a significant role in Total rewards spend is one of the largest ongoing corporate costsyet,
engaging the workforce the intended outcomes of this spend are not well articulated, understood,
measured, or realized. Respondents to the Aon Hewitt 2011 Talent Survey
report that the current management of the cost of total rewards is half as
effective as its importance.
Extremely
Important
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not
Important
Importance
25%
36%
29%
8%
3%
Extremely
Effective
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Not
Effective
Effectiveness
12%
36%
37%
12%
3%
Extremely
Effective
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Not
Effective
11%
30%
37%
19%
2%
Employee/executive retention
8%
20%
41%
26%
5%
Employee engagement
4%
14%
45%
31%
7%
13
Role of middle management will be Middle managers are the delivery mechanism to the workforce,
critical to business strategy execution communicating change and business strategy, developing models on how
and engaging the workforce the workforce will contribute to the businesss performance. Twenty-six
percent of respondents agree that middle managers are most essential for
carrying out critical work for the organization; nearly the same percentage
as choose senior management. And, when asked what the main issues are
that could prevent an organization from reaching its strategic goals quickly,
ineffective decision-making and siloed thinking behaviors were the top
two responses.
Middle managers are also perceived to be an at-risk attraction and retention
group. One-quarter of respondents report that middle managers will be
the most challenging in regards to attraction and retention. No other
position is thought to be more challenging.
14
Aon Hewitt
Role
Most
Essential
Most
Challenging
Executives
12%
5%
12%
12%
Individual contributors
14%
17%
Middle management
26%
25%
4%
9%
Senior management
29%
19%
Technical/scientific specialists
4%
13%
In the past few years, the employee contract has been disruptedand in
many cases decimatedas companies reacted to the economic downturn
and legislative changes with programmatic cutbacks and continued
shifting of benefits cost and risk onto employees. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics shows a decrease in productivity (output per hour worked)
for the first time in five consecutive quarters of strong productivity growth
since 2009. The concept of doing more with less may have just reached
a point of diminishing returns. Corporate stress and burnout are on the rise.
Igniting a high-performance culture may well have to start with engaging
the workforce. Highly engaged employees provide higher value. They
are more effective at producing high quality and innovative products/
services, and they more positively impact customer satisfaction, cost,
and revenue growth.
Getting back to normal may not be good enough. To re-engage the
disengaged and obtain an engagement lift, baseline rewards must meet
baseline needs. But, giving all employees exactly what they want is
unrealistic. A pragmatic approach is required for an immediate impact. Focus
on the highest-value employees. The 80/20 rule applies to human
capital20% of the organizations employees create 80% of the value.
Invest in identifying the 20%, the relative value that they provide, and
what they want. Then, deliver on those factors that are under your control.
Organizations may also design and market programs targeted at specific
high-value segments (e.g., generations, levels, job classes, or functions) to
drive specific desired outcomes from those groups.
Organizations are carefully considering the management and
communication of total rewards, defined as everything an employer
provides that employees perceive as rewarding or valuable. As we
have seen from much of the data reviewed here, total rewards are far
more than compensation and benefits. Leading companies are looking
holistically at data to understand what rewards program designs will drive
key employee outcomes. Not only do the drivers differ by employee
segment, they also differ across the spectrum of attraction, retention,
and engagement.
The key is to expend the appropriate level of organizational focus, attention,
and investment, commensurate with the relative value that an employee, or
employee group, creates.
15
16
Aon Hewitt
Leadership Findings:
The New Normal Demands New Leadership
Talented, effective, and respected leaders have a dramatic impact on
employee engagement, innovation, and profitability. They also
drive organizational change from the top, working through middle
management to translate strategy into tactical plans.
17
Key Findings
There is a perceived gap in When asked about the importance of leadership credibility, almost
leadership effectiveness unanimously (97%) respondents agree that leadership credibility is
important, very important or extremely important to the business strategy.
Respondents were then asked about importance and effectiveness of
current leadership for meeting business growth goals, driving innovation,
meeting profitability targets, delivering desired customer service levels,
ensuring safety, attracting talent, and retaining talent.
Respondents agree that leadership is extremely important for:
n
18
Aon Hewitt
There is a general lack of confidence in Respondents reflect a lack of confidence in their leaders ability to drive
leaders ability to drive change change or effectively communicate change. When asked about leaderships
ability to manage change, only 9% report success to an extremely high
extent and just 33% report success to a high extent. When asked about the
importance and effectiveness of change interventions, respondents report
significant gaps between extremely important and extremely effective:
Change Initiative
Extremely
Important
Extremely
Effective
Communication
55%
10%
57%
13%
Aon Hewitts Perspective We operate in a world that is volatile, uncertain, and complex. Rapid-fire
change is the norm and is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, challenges
facing an organization. Yet, enterprises often find themselves ill-equipped to
adapt. So, change is often slow.
When continuous change is the norm, the entire leadership team must be
equipped to become catalysts for change. For many, this requires a new
set of capabilitiesone of the most important being creativity. Leaders must
now demonstrate speed and agility, navigate ambiguity and complexity,
develop middle managers, lift engagement, and deliver relevant messages.
We see the need for a revised set of leadership skills reflected in the survey
responses that confirms a lack of leadership effectiveness and inability
to lead the changes that are necessary. Organizations should evaluate
current leadership by assessing leaders against critical competencies,
and accelerating skill development in areas found lacking.
Mid-level managers, too, are vitally important to rapidly aligning an
organizations workforce around leaderships strategy and direction. They
are in a unique position to bridge the gap between strategy and employee
engagement, perceptions, and productivity. For a rapid alignment strategy
to work, mid-level managers must be equipped with the right tools, driven
by the senior leadership team, to internalize strategy, translate strategy into
decisive local action, and drive performance. Our survey results find
effective leadership communication lacking. Improving communication and
empowering mid-level managers, who are closest to employees, will result
in more efficient strategy execution and improved productivity.
19
20
Aon Hewitt
21
Key Findings
Respondents to the Aon Hewitt 2011 Talent Survey report a more optimistic
hiring view of workers in the coming year, with 45% citing slightly greater
to significantly greater hiring volumes than in the past year. Only 16% of
organizations anticipate slightly or significantly less hiring this year as
compared to last.
The Aon Hewitt 2011 Talent Survey shows that:
n
Top hiring priority is quality, When asked about the goal of their organizations talent acquisition function
not quantity in the coming year, 55% report increased focus on the quality of candidates.
Similarly, when asked their top hiring priority, nearly 60% agree that it is
very or extremely important to hire more productive employees. Less than
50% cite filling positions faster and staying on budget as a top priority.
Important
30%
Somewhat Important
7%
Not Important
3%
22
Aon Hewitt
Somewhat Effective
18%
Not Effective
3%
Talent acquisition function may be a With job cuts and unemployment stabilizing, HR executives can now look
candidate for process improvement toward growing their workforces in strategic areas where growth is
anticipated. That growth will require many formerly downsized talent
acquisition functions to match business demand with the required
employees to deliver the goods or services.
HR leaders appear less inclined to rebuild their recruiting function with
full-time employees during recovery, with only 8% citing rebuilding the
recruitment team as a primary goal in 2011. They may look at smaller fixes
such as redesigning talent acquisition to be more scalable, streamlined,
and to operate more cost-effectively, with 35% of respondents stating that
recruiting and staffing could benefit from process improvement.
23
Employee referrals continue to be the Social media is certain to change the face of talent acquisition, but
prevalent new hire source respondents to the survey report a wait-and-see position. Only 24%
of respondents cite that determining how to use social media in
recruitment is very or extremely important. And, when asked to rank
the most effective sources of new hires, traditional recruiting techniques
such as employee referrals and job boards top the list for both entry level/
hourly and experienced/mid-career new hires.
Sources
Entry level/
New hires
Experienced/
Mid-career
Employee referrals
48%
40%
Job boards
30%
31%
12%
20%
Agencies
(search firms or temporary)
16%
28%
29%
25%
Social media
(LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook)
5%
10%
Existing employees
(internal placements)
21%
27%
Print media
(newspapers, trade journals)
12%
9%
Job fairs/recruitment
events/open houses
9%
4%
Unsolicited walk-ins,
resume, application
9%
2%
11%
3%
(Choose up to 3.)
24
Aon Hewitt
Aon Hewitts Perspective With job cuts and unemployment stabilizing and business recovery in most
industries looming, HR executives can look toward growing their workforces
in strategic areas outlined by executive management. The key acquisition
issues HR departments will face are:
How to react to fluctuating business demands combined with an urgency
to hire productive new employees to support the new growth.
n
25
26
Aon Hewitt
Next-Generation
Communication Findings:
Communication in the New Age of Employee
Engagement, Recruitment, and Productivity
Todays employees are empowered, confident, hard to reach, and equally
hard to engage. Individual communication toolse-mails, conference
calls, webinars, hard copy mailingsdont seem to have the desired impact.
And communication for communications sake, without a tie to business
strategy or an overall plan, is ineffective.
27
Key Findings
Traditional communication tools Where organizations are focused on employee communication, the use of
are still prevalent more traditional methods such as e-mail and intranets still far outweighs
the use of emerging social media tools. Even in the recruiting space there
is a disconnect where 55% of employers see social media as an important
tool to leverage when reaching recruits, but only 5% to 10% of employers
think social media is an effective source of candidates.
Social media networks not prevalent Only 16% of organizations are investing in social media tools, with most still
in HR (yet) depending on established methods such as e-mail (push) and intranets
(pull). Reluctance to embrace new technologies appears to carry ahead over
the next three years, where only 30% of organizations believe that they
will invest in social media as a means of communicating with employees.
Generally speaking, investments in communication over the next three
years are split almost 50-50 between increased budgets and holding steady.
While companies do not seem to be focusing on social media in the
next three years, a large number, 67%, either have formal policies in place
dictating how employees should use social networking tools, or are working
on formulating those polices.
28
Aon Hewitt
Aon Hewitts Perspective The survey data confirms that while most organizations believe that
communicating with employees is extremely important, the vast majority
will admit that they are not very good at it. There is a fairly large disconnect
between belief and actual results. While one can speculate on the reasons
(e.g., internal staffing issues, budget, other priorities), it is clear that
companies feel their communications could be more effective in impacting
employee behavior. We feel strongly that organizations need to:
n
With all of the press that social media receives today, it is not yet the
communication of choice for organizations budget dollars, at least in the
near term. We believe these tools can be a highly effective and productive
means of communicating; however, employers lack employees personal
cell phone numbers and e-mail addresses, and that is hindering the
expansion of social media as a broad-based resource. Allowing employees
to opt in to text and e-mail message services is gaining some momentum,
although it is still too soon to tell if most employees will embrace the
technology for this purpose.
29
30
Aon Hewitt
31
HR Event
Global off-shoring
HR outsourcing
11%
13%
49%
38%
HR cost cutting
27%
Increased hiring
38%
29%
61%
48%
20%
35%
HR Strength
Internal service excellence provided to employees
43%
27%
Driving innovation
Aon Hewitt
8%
Ensuring safety
13%
Low-cost function
24%
Competitive benefits
50%
Competitive compensation
23%
22%
15%
32
8%
8%
HR Administrative Area
Recruiting and staffing administration
35%
Onboarding/Offboarding
37%
57%
Benefits administration
19%
Training coordination/Tracking
34%
10%
18%
Region
Europe
10%
Russia
0%
Asia/Pacific
14%
India
5%
Africa
2%
Middle East
2%
U.S./Canada
74%
Latin America
7%
33
Concern
Aging workforce/retirements
9%
18%
10%
Engagement of employees
16%
Leading change
6%
Other
3%
Aon Hewitt
8%
Outlook
Now, we currently have a shortage.
19%
15%
26%
17%
2%
34
31%
22%
Importance
Extremely
important
Very
important
Important
Somewhat
important
Not
important
56%
28%
10%
4%
3%
Innovate
29%
39%
25%
6%
1%
56%
26%
10%
3%
4%
56%
32%
11%
1%
0%
Ensure safety
36%
25%
25%
9%
5%
Attract talent
30%
43%
21%
5%
1%
Retain talent
44%
39%
14%
3%
1%
Extremely
effective
Very
effective
Effective
Somewhat
effective
12%
34%
36%
16%
2%
7%
21%
36%
31%
5%
Effectiveness
Not
effective
Innovate
14%
31%
36%
15%
4%
17%
38%
33%
11%
1%
Ensure safety
17%
35%
37%
9%
2%
Attract talent
5%
27%
41%
23%
3%
Retain talent
7%
26%
40%
22%
4%
35
10
Role
Executives
12%
Senior management
29%
Middle management
26%
12%
Individual contributors
14%
Technical/scientific specialists
4%
4%
Role
Executives
First level management
12%
Individual contributors
17%
Middle management
25%
11
Aon Hewitt
9%
Senior management
19%
Technical/scientific specialists
13%
Issue
Governance, structure, and efficiency of decision making
17%
13%
12%
Investment
12%
36
5%
7%
Siloed thinking/behavior
29%
Workforce engagement
10%
12
Elements
Cost
58%
Competitive position
25%
Legal/regulatory compliance
17%
38%
16%
13
7%
33%
Elements
Cost
28%
Competitive position
34%
Legal/regulatory compliance
12%
50%
17%
5%
55%
37
14
Importance
Extremely
Important
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not
Important
25%
36%
29%
8%
3%
31%
42%
20%
6%
1%
38%
37%
17%
6%
2%
Enhancing employee
engagement and performance
31%
39%
20%
8%
2%
Planning future
workforce requirements
16%
35%
31%
14%
4%
Managing a multi-cultural,
global workforce
11%
18%
25%
18%
28%
Extremely
Effective
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Not
Effective
12%
36%
37%
12%
3%
15
38
Effectiveness
6%
25%
41%
24%
4%
8%
26%
41%
21%
4%
Enhancing employee
engagement and performance
3%
17%
40%
30%
9%
Planning future
workforce requirements
3%
12%
35%
37%
14%
Managing a multi-cultural,
global workforce
5%
10%
35%
26%
24%
Aon Hewitt
16
Agreement
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
15%
52%
22%
10%
1%
22%
64%
11%
3%
0%
7%
50%
31%
12%
0%
6%
49%
34%
11%
0%
11%
50%
30%
9%
1%
17
Hiring Volume
Significantly greater
12%
Slightly greater
33%
39%
Slightly less
10%
Significantly less
6%
39
18
Importance
Extremely
important
Very
important
Important
Somewhat
important
Not
Important
20%
39%
30%
7%
3%
18%
32%
28%
13%
9%
17%
32%
31%
15%
5%
14%
28%
36%
16%
6%
Launch new
recruitment technology
7%
18%
25%
26%
25%
4%
20%
31%
27%
18%
Improve onboarding/orientation
program
14%
34%
30%
15%
7%
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
19
40
Effectiveness
Extremely
Effective
Not
Effective
5%
23%
51%
18%
3%
7%
19%
43%
26%
5%
4%
17%
39%
32%
8%
11%
27%
45%
13%
3%
Launch new
recruitment technology
5%
13%
34%
28%
19%
3%
8%
26%
35%
28%
Improve onboarding/orientation
program
4%
16%
37%
32%
10%
Aon Hewitt
20
Sources
Employee referrals
48%
Job boards
30%
12%
16%
29%
5%
21%
12%
9%
9%
21
11%
Sources
Employee referrals
40%
Job boards
31%
20%
28%
25%
10%
27%
9%
4%
2%
3%
41
22
23
Sources
Becoming more lean
15%
55%
30%
22%
12%
8%
7%
3%
Agreement
Strongly
Agree
42
Strongly
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
4%
41%
40%
13%
2%
12%
43%
27%
15%
3%
5%
39%
38%
16%
2%
14%
40%
21%
18%
5%
5%
22%
30%
34%
10%
11%
31%
26%
25%
6%
Aon Hewitt
24
Importance
Extremely
Important
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not
Important
Communication
55%
32%
10%
2%
1%
57%
31%
8%
3%
0%
14%
36%
35%
11%
4%
Measurement
17%
37%
31%
11%
3%
Capability building
13%
33%
37%
13%
4%
13%
32%
36%
15%
3%
Stakeholder involvement
26%
38%
24%
8%
4%
Workforce transition
(e.g., headcount
reduction, redeployment)
12%
31%
38%
13%
6%
43
25
Effectiveness
Extremely
Effective
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Not
Effective
Communication
10%
26%
35%
24%
5%
13%
29%
31%
22%
5%
3%
15%
39%
32%
11%
Measurement
5%
15%
32%
35%
13%
Capability building
3%
12%
38%
36%
11%
5%
17%
44%
27%
7%
Stakeholder involvement
6%
23%
37%
26%
7%
Workforce transition
(e.g., headcount
reduction, redeployment)
6%
20%
43%
24%
6%
26
44
Aon Hewitt
Agreement
Yes
51%
No
49%
27
Business Metrics
Revenue growth
22%
Cost savings
22%
Market share
6%
Innovation
2%
Speed of transition/integration/restructuring
5%
Customer satisfaction
28
17%
3%
Employee retention
8%
Employee productivity
5%
Employee engagement
8%
Involvement
Deeply involved in creating the strategy, then asked
to execute
31%
40%
12%
Not involved
9%
8%
45
29
30
46
Agreement
Yes
47%
No
53%
Effectiveness
Extremely
Effective
Very
Effective
Effective
Somewhat
Effective
Not
Effective
11%
30%
37%
19%
2%
Employee/executive retention
8%
20%
41%
26%
5%
Employee engagement
4%
14%
45%
31%
7%
4%
17%
38%
29%
10%
Executives understanding
of their unique pay, benefits,
and wealth accumulation
opportunities
11%
30%
38%
16%
5%
5%
16%
42%
26%
10%
Aon Hewitt
31
Importance
Extremely
Important
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not
Important
Employee understanding of
business objectives
34%
40%
20%
4%
1%
39%
41%
17%
3%
0%
Employee engagement
36%
42%
18%
4%
1%
Building a strong
corporate culture
33%
37%
21%
7%
2%
53%
33%
11%
2%
1%
Managing organizational
transformation/change
28%
43%
23%
4%
2%
Employees understanding of
the value of your organizations
total rewards
15%
39%
33%
11%
2%
Employees understanding
of how your organizations
employee benefits plans work
17%
39%
34%
8%
2%
Employees understanding of
changes to policies/procedures
17%
39%
35%
8%
1%
27%
36%
27%
9%
1%
Safety
36%
26%
25%
10%
3%
47
32
48
Extent
Very high
Extent
High
Extent
Some
Extent
Little
Extent
None
18%
36%
35%
9%
2%
9%
36%
43%
10%
2%
Employee understanding of
business objectives
Employee engagement
11%
34%
42%
11%
3%
18%
31%
37%
12%
3%
18%
37%
33%
10%
3%
Managing organizational
transformation/change
9%
31%
44%
13%
3%
5%
25%
44%
21%
5%
Employees understanding
of how your organizations
employee benefits plans work
9%
39%
38%
12%
2%
Employees understanding of
changes to policies/procedures
8%
33%
45%
11%
2%
12%
35%
37%
13%
3%
Safety
21%
28%
31%
14%
6%
Aon Hewitt
33
Communication Areas
E-mail
61%
Organization intranet
57%
Online newsletters/brochures
39%
Printed newsletters/brochures
29%
42%
29%
Multimedia/video
20%
Focus groups
23%
24%
Instant messaging
13%
Pulse surveys
13%
16%
Blogs/discussion boards
12%
Podcasts
4%
Text messaging
5%
49
34
50
Aon Hewitt
Communication Areas
E-mail
36%
Organization intranet
42%
Online newsletters/brochures
33%
Printed newsletters/brochures
15%
27%
14%
Multimedia/video
28%
Focus groups
22%
31%
Instant messaging
14%
Pulse surveys
19%
30%
Blogs/discussion boards
21%
Podcasts
14%
Text messaging
8%
35
36
Communication Investment
Decrease
2%
Increase
50%
47%
39%
28%
20%
13%
51