Tolerance Analysis

Tolerance Analysis
and
Stack-up Tolerances
Aditi Consultancy Services
#2, ANANDA, 19th Cross, 24th Main
J P Nagar 5th Phase, Bangalore-560078
Phone/Fax: 080-26580711; Mobile: 9449612671
Web Site: http://www.aditiconsultancy.com
TOLERANCES
BILATERAL TOLERANCE
EQUAL BILATERAL
UNEQUAL BILATERAL
UNILATERAL TOLERANCE
LIMIT TOLERANCE
2
Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore
Bilateral Tolerance
A bilateral tolerance is a tolerance which is expressed as
plus and minus values, where neither is zero, to denote
permissible variations in both directions from the
specified size.
3
Unilateral Tolerance
A unilateral tolerance is one which applies only in one
direction from the specified size, so that the permissible
variation in the other direction is zero.
4
Limit Dimensioning
5
Limits of Size
6
Limits of Size
7
Classification of Tolerances
Tolerances
Dimensional
Size
Geometric
Form
Orientation
Location
Run-out
Profile
Straightness
Parallelism
Position
Circular
Line
Flatness
Perpendicularity
Concentricity
Total
Surface
Circularity
Angularity
Symmetry
Cylindricity
8
Fuel Pump
Fuel Pump
9
Geometrical Variations
Geometry, GD&T...
10
Assembly, FEA, Wear ...
Assembly Problems
11
Dimension this part with a tolerance of 0.05mm between

any two surfaces
12
Tolerance Accumulation
Chain Dimensioning
13
Base Line Dimensioning
14
Direct Dimensioning
15
Change the design such that variation in distance between any two
surfaces is not more than 0.1mm
16
Position tolerance of Multiple Holes
17
LIMITS and FITS
Material Conditions
Maximum Material Condition (MMC)
That condition where a feature of size contains the maximum
amount of material within the stated limits of size.
Example: maximum shaft size and minimum hole size.
Least Material Condition (LMC)

That condition where a feature of size contains the least
amount of material within the stated limits of size.
Example: minimum shaft size and maximum hole size.
Shaft Size Limits
20
Hole Size Limits
21
Taylors Principle
FITS
Clearance Fit
Transition Fit
Interference Fit
Deviations
Deviations
+ 0.3
Hole Tolerance
0.2
+ 0.1
12
- 0.1
- 0.10
- 0.17
0.07
Shaft Tolerance
+ 0.1
FITS
INTERFERENCE
FITS
p
m
H
g
e
k
j
f
TRANSITION FITS
d
c
b
CLEARANCE FITS
a
26
Types of Fits
Extra Loose Running Fit
Loose Running Fit
Easy Running Fit
Running Fit
Close Running Fit
Slide Fit
Push Fit
Wringing Fit Easy Keying Fit
Light Keying Fit
Drive Fit
Light Press Fit
Press Fit
Heavy Press Fit
ISO SYSTEM OF TOLERANCES

SHAFT
ISO SYSTEM OF TOLERANCES

HOLE
Fundamental Deviation
Fundamental deviations are represented by the
following letter symbols:
Type of Fit
Hole
Shaft
Clearance
A, B, C, D, E,
EF,F,FG, G & H
a, b, c, d, e, ef,
f, fg, g & h
Transition
J, JS, K, M & N
j, js, k, m & n
Interference
P, R, S, T, U, V,
p, r, s, t, u, v, x,
X, Y, Z, ZA, ZB & ZC y, z, za, zb & zc
I T GRADES
INDIAN STANDARD IS 919-1963
18 FUNDAMENTAL TOLERANCES or
TOLERANCE GRADES .
For different grades values of standard
tolerance are determined from diff formulas.
Relative magnitude of each grade is
GRADES
IT5
IT6
IT7
IT8
IT9
IT10
IT11
IT12
IT13
IT14
IT15
IT16
VALUES
7i
10i
16i
25i
40i
64i
100i
160i
250i
400i
640i
1000i
Where i = 0.45
D + 0.001 D
Tolerance Grades
30m
Tolerance Zones IT5 to IT11

with h Tolerance Grade
H7
For a
50 hole/shaft
combination
LIMITS AND FITS
Fundamental Deviations
Fixing the Fit between Hole and Shaft

Problem:
Taking the nominal size of the shaft and the hole as 8mm, fix the
ISO system fits for the hole and shaft diameters such that the
clearance lies between 0.05 to 0.35 mm
36

Let the hole tolerance be 0 & +0.2 mm.
The size of the hole would be 8
+ 0.2
0
The design clearance value varies from 0.05 to 0.35 mm

Minimum clearance between hole and shaft
AL = MMCH(Minimum dia of hole) MMCS(Maximum dia of shaft)
i.e 0.05 = 8.0 - Maximum dia of shaft
So, Maximum dia of shaft = 8.0 0.05 = 7.95
Maximum clearance between hole and shaft
CL = LMCH (Maximum dia of hole) LMCS(Minimum dia of shaft)
i.e 0.35 = 8.2 - Minimum dia of shaft
So, Minimum dia of shaft = 8.2 0.35 = 7.85
7.95
The two size limits of the shaft would be

7.85
In other words, the shaft size would be 8
- 0.05
- 0.15
mm.
37

Problem:
Taking the nominal size of the shaft and the hole as 8mm, fix the
tolerances for the hole and shaft diameters such that the maximum
clearance is 0.1 and maximum interference is 0.02
38
Tolerance Analysis
A
B
Nominal Condition
AB+C
39
Tolerance Analysis
Aa
Bb
Worst Case Assembly Condition
Cc
(A - a) (B + b) + (C + c)
40
Tolerance Analysis
Maximum Gap Condition

(A+a) {(B - b) + (C - c)}
Minimum Gap Condition

(A-a) {(B + b) + (C + c)}
41
Tolerance Analysis
Find the maximum and minimum gap values when the following 3 parts are
assembled.
+0.05
50 -0.02
30 0.1
19.5 0.2
Making a Tolerance Equal Bilateral
3.019
+.012
-.000
3.031
+.000
-.012
3.028
+.003
-.009
3.022
+.009
-.003
3.025
.006
43
Tolerance Analysis vs. Tolerance Synthesis
Tolerance Synthesis /
Tolerance Allocation
Tolerance Analysis
44
Tolerance Analysis
Functional Requirement:
The functional requirements for an assembly are normally expressed
as toleranced dimensions.
Functional Dimensions:
These are the dimensions on the components which directly affect
the functional requirements
Loop Equation: The loop equation forms a closed loop of

functional dimensions involved in a functional requirement.
It is derived by starting on left side of the functional requirement
dimension and then moving round the assembly from one functional
surface to the another, adding or subtracting the functional
dimensions as appropriate, until the right side of the functional
requirement is reached.
45
Loop Equation for Z1
Z1 = E + D C B A
46
Tolerance Analysis
+0.06
50 -0.04
30.03
29.95
20 0.02
Calculate the mean value of the gap with equal bilateral tolerance. Determine
the maximum and minimum values of the gap in the assembly.
47
Tolerance Analysis
Find the maximum and minimum gap values when the following 3 parts are
assembled.
+0.05
50 -0.02
30 0.1
19.5 0.2
For the given nominal dimensions of the parts, fix the tolerances such that the
gap in the assembly is with in 0.4 to 0.6 mm
41
C
52
A
10.5
B
GAP
Equation for gap is, G = A B C
0.4 0.6
C
A
49
41
C
+0.05
0
52
10.5
B
+0.1
0
G=ABC
Maximum gap, G max = A max - B min C min

0.6 = 52.05 10.5 C min
C min = 40.95
Minimum gap, G min = A min - B max C max

0.4 = 52 10.6 C max
C max = 41
The maximum and minimum values of the gap meet the two specified limits
50
Determine the nominal dimension of C and fix the tolerances for B and C
+0.03
0
52
A
10
B
GAP
Equation for gap is, G = A B C
10.1
C
A
51
Tolerance Analysis For Lengths
52
Hydraulic Punch Assembly

Sleeve
Hydraulic
Cylinder
Plunger
Cap
Z1
Z2
Punch Stopper
Piston
The functional requirements are:

Length of Protrusion of the Punch, Z1
Length of the Spring when the punch is fully extended, Z2

The functional dimensions which directly affect the functional
requirements Z1 and Z2 are:
A is the wall thickness of the cap.
B is the distance between the contacting surfaces of the cap and
sleeve and those of the sleeve and stop.
C is the thickness of the stop.
D is the overall length of the piston.
E is the overall length of the punch
F is the length of the head of the punch
54
Geometric Analysis For Lengths

55
Z1 = E + D C B A
56
Design Sizes for Functional Dimensions

Let the nominal punch protrusion, Z1, be 12 mm
Assign the design sizes to the independent functional dimensions
so that the functional requirements are satisfied.
Let
E = 90.0
D = 125.0
B = 160.0
A = 16.0
From the loop equation, Z1 = E + D C B A

C = 27.0
Let Z1 be 12 0.4 mm
Tolerances for the functional dimensions A, B, C, D & E can be
allocated suitably,
B = 160 0.12
C = 27 0.06
E = 90 0.06
A = 16 0.1
D = 125 0.06
57
58
Tolerances for Functional Dimensions

The spring dimension with tolerance, Z2 is 25 0.4 mm.
From loop equation Z2 = B + C D - F
Z2 minimum occurs when
B is minimum
C is minimum
D is maximum
F is maximum
So, Z2MIN = BMIN + CMIN DMAX - FMAX

Substituting values for Z2, B, C and D in the loop equation,
24.6 = 159.88 + 26.94 125.06 FMAX
Z2 maximum occurs when
B is maximum
C is maximum
F maximum is 37.16
D is minimum
F is minimum
So, Z2MAX = BMAX + CMAX DMIN - FMIN

Substituting values for Z2, B, C and D in the loop equation,
25.4 = 160.12 + 27.06 124.94 FMIN
F minimum is 36.84
i.e., F = 37 0.16
59
MAX / MIN Tolerance Chart

Loop equation is Z2 = B + C D - F
The parts have equal bilateral tolerances
Column 1
Column 2
Part #
Stack
Contributor
sign
Maximum
sign
Minimum
160.12
159.88
0.25
27.06
26.94
0.12
124.94
125.06
0.12
36.84
37.16
0.31
24.6
0.8
Totals
25.4
60
MAXIM
UM
STEP ID
COMMENTS:
DESCRIPTION FROM/TO
SUB TOTALS
ANSWER
MINIM
UM
Component
Factored
Component
Tolerance
Total
Tolerance
Monte
Tolerance
Squared
Carlo
MRSS
RSS
MC
MAX
MIN
MIN
MAX
+
WORST CASE
OPTIMIZED?
DESIGN GOAL:
YES NO
61
MAX / MIN Tolerance Chart

MAXIMUM
STEP ID
DESCRIPTION FROM/TO
MINIMUM
COMPONENT
FACTORED
COMPONENT
TOLERANCE
TOTAL
TOLERANCE
MONTE
TOLERANCE
SQUARED
CARLO
MAX
MIN
MIN
MAX
160.12
159.88
0.24
0.800
0.0576
27.06
26.94
0.12
0.800
0.0144
124.94
125.06
0.12
0.736
0.0144
36.84
37.16
0.32
0.640
0.1024
25.4
24.6
0.8
0.652
0.435
COMMENTS:
SUB TOTALS
ANSWER
WORST
CASE
MRSS
RSS
MC
OPTIMIZED?
DESIGN GOAL:
YES NO
62

Design this hydraulic assembly keeping Z1 = 10 0.6 and Z2 = 25 0.4
63
Shaft and Housing Assembly
Clearance = -A + B - C + D - E + F - G
Shaft and Housing Assembly
Dimension
Nominal Value
.0505
8.000
.5093
.400
7.711
.400
.5093
.0015
.008
.0025
.002
.006
.002
.0025
Fixed
Design
Fixed
Design
Design
Design
Fixed
Tolerances(+/-)
The mean assembly clearance is the vector sum of the average part dimensions
in the loop: = -A + B - C + D - E + F - G
= -.0505 + 8.000 - .5093 + .400 - 7.711 + .400 - .5093
= .020
Let us say the functional tolerance for the assembly clearance is +/-.015.
The actual clearance tolerance is obtained by summing the given tolerances
TASM = + TA+ TB+ TC+ TD+ TE+ TF+ TG

= + .0015 + .008 + .0025 + .002 + .006 + .002 + .0025
= .0245 (too large)
66
http://www.aditiconsultancy.com
Tolerance Allocation by Proportional Scaling

Solving for the proportionality factor:
.015 = .0015 +.0025 +.0025 + P (.008 + .002 + .006 + .002)

P = .47222
Note that the fixed tolerances were subtracted from the assembly tolerance
before computing the scale factor. Thus only the four design tolerances are
re-allocated:
TB= .47222 (.008) = .00378
TE= .47222 (.006) = .00283
TD= .47222 (.002) = .00094
TF= .47222 (.002) = .00094
Each of the design tolerances has been scaled down to meet assembly
requirements. This procedure could also be followed assuming a statistical sum
for the assembly tolerance, in which case the tolerances would be scaled up.
67
Dimension
Nominal Value
.0505
8.000
.5093
.400
7.711
.400
.5093
.0015
.008
.0025
.002
.006
.002
.0025
Fixed
Design
Fixed
Design
Design
Design
Fixed
Tolerances(+/-)
Geometric Tolerance Analysis
69
Geometric Tolerance Zones
70
Propagation of Variation
Rotational error due to surface variation
71
Form Variation
Orientation Variation
Location Variation
Nominal
Position
Accumulation of Variation
Geometric variations propagate through an assembly as

imperfect shapes and surfaces contact each other.
75
Substrate Package
Substrate Package
Gap = A + B C + D + E
Where A = .040 .003
B = 0 .002
C = .125 .005
D = .185 .008
E = 0 .004
Form Controls
Component Variation
Size variation
Form variation
Location variation
Orientation variation
Surface roughness variation
79
Assembly Variation
Component size variation

Component form or shape variation
Component feature location variation
Component feature orientation variation
80
Functional Gauges for

Perpendicularity Checking
81

82

83

84
Datum Reference Frame
Sequence of datum features that relate part to

Datum Reference Frame
85
Floating Fasteners
86
Floating Fasteners
87
Fixed Fasteners
88
Fixed Fasteners
89
Centered
Shifted
Floating
Fasteners
Fixed
fasteners
90
Formulas for Position Tolerance
F
P
T
D
91
Formulas for Position Tolerance

F = Maximum Diameter of fastener (MMC limit)
H = Minimum Diameter of the clearance hole (MMC limit)
T = Positional Tolerance Diameter
For Floating Fasteners,
H=F+T
or
T=H-F
For Fixed Fasteners,

H = F + 2T or T =
HF
2
If part with tapped holes should have larger positional tolerance (T1)
than the part with clearance holes (T2), then 2T = T1 + T2,
i.e.
H = F + T1 + T2
92
Example 1:
In case of a floating fastener assembly, fasteners are 3.5 diameter
maximum and the clearance holes are 3.94 diameter minimum. Find
the required positional tolerance
T
= HF
= 3.94 3.5
= 0.44 diameter for each part
Example 2:
In the above case, find the required positional tolerance if the assembly
had fixed fasteners
T
= (H F) / 2
= (3.94 3.5) / 2
= 0.22 diameter for each part
93
Coaxial Features
The formula for the floating fastener
case also applies to mating parts
having two coaxial features where one
of these features is a datum for the
other.
Where it is desired to divide the
available tolerance unequally between
the parts, the formula used is:
H1 + H2 = F1 + F2 + T1 + T2
94
Example 4:
In the previous example of coaxial features solve for T1 and T2.
H1 + H2 = F1 + F2 + T1 + T2
T1 + T2 = (H1 + H2) (F1+F2)
= (20 + 10) (19.95 + 9.95)
= 0.1 total available tolerance
If T1 = 0.06, then T2= 0.04
95
H7
What should be T1 and T2?

10H7
g6
10g6
96
Position Tolerance of a Hole at MMC
97
Functional Gauge for Inspection
Part must slide over 13.88 gauge pin.

Must lie flat on base of gage (Datum A).
Touch Datum B along its length and simultaneously touch Datum C
98
3-2-1 Principle: Functional Gauge
Part must slide over 13.88 gauge pin Must lie flat on base of gage (Datum A)
Touch Datum B at least at two points along its length
Simultaneously touch Datum C at least at one point
99
Virtual Condition Boundary for Orientation
100
Virtual Condition Boundary for Location
101
Virtual Condition Boundary for Location
102
104
MMC Resultant Condition

The variable boundary generated by the collective effects of a size
features specified size tolerance, the geometric tolerance specified
at MMC material condition and the additional geometric tolerance
derived from the features departure from its specified MMC material
condition.
Resultant Condition is derived by
For External features of size controlled at MMC:
LMC size limit - Geometric Tolerance - Size Tolerance
For Internal features of size controlled at MMC:
LMC size limit + Geometric Tolerance + Size Tolerance
Position at RFS
Gap = A/2 + B
Where
A = .0625 .0001
B = .2250 .0011
106
Position at MMC Internal Feature
Gap = A - B /2
107
Position at MMC Internal Feature

The value for B in the Loop diagram is:
Largest outer boundary = .145 + .020 = .165
Smallest inner boundary = .139 - .014 = .125
Nominal diameter = ( .165 + .125)/2 = .145
Equal bilateral tolerance = .020
For position at MMC, an easier way to convert this is:
LMC (total size tolerance + tolerance in the feature control frame)
= .145 (.006 + .014) = .145 .020
The equation for the Gap in previous fig is
Gap = A - B /2
Where
A = .312 0 and
B = .145 .020
108
Position at MMC External Feature
Gap = A/2 + B
109

The value for B in the Loop diagram is:
Largest outer boundary = .0626 + .0022 = .0648
Smallest inner boundary = .0624 - .0024 = .0600
Nominal diameter = ( .0648 + .0600)/2 = .0624
Equal bilateral tolerance = .0024
For position at MMC, an easier way to convert this is:
LMC (total size tolerance + tolerance in the feature control frame)
= .0624 (.0002 + .0022) = .0624 .0024
The equation for the Gap in previous fig is
Gap = A/2 + B
Where
A = .0624 .0024
B = .2250 0
and
110

Find the values of maximum and minimum gap
111

Find the values of maximum and minimum gap
Gap = A/2 + B
112
4X 16 0.4
0.16
0.04
Find gaps G1 and G2
G1
G2
50
20
50
25
A B C
A
Profile Tolerancing
Calculate the minimum value of Y and Z dimensions
Concentricity
Gap = + A/2 + B C/2

Where A = .125 .008
B = 0 .003
C = .062 .005
115
Motor Assembly
116
Motor Components
Housing
Housing Cap
Stator
Rotor
Screw
Inner
bearing
Cap
Shaft
Bearing
Bearing
Outer
bearing
Cap 117
Motor Components
118
Motor Components
Housing
Housing Cap
Stator
Rotor
Screw
Inner
bearing
Cap
Shaft
Bearing
Bearing
Outer
bearing
Cap 119
Establishing Performance/Assembly
Requirement
Requirement 1: The gap between the shaft and the inner bearing cap
must always be greater than zero to ensure that the rotor is clamped and
the bearings are preloaded
Requirement 2:The gap between the housing cap and the housing must
always be greater than zero to ensure that stator is clamped
Requirement 3:The The mounting surfaces of the rotor and stator must be
within .005 for the motor to operate
Requirement 4:The bearing outer race must always protrude beyond the
main housing. So that the bearing stays clamped
Requirement 5:The thread of the bearing cap screw must have a
minimum thread engagement of .200 inches
Requirement 6:The bottom of the bearing cap screw thread must never
touch the bottom of the female thread on the shaft
Requirement 7: The rotor and stator must never touch. The maximum
radial distance between the rotor and stator is .020
120
Motor Assembly
121
Motor Assembly
122
Conversion of Requirements into

Assembly Gap Requirements
Requirement 1: Gap 1 0
Requirement 3: Gap 3 .005
Requirement 5: Gap 5 .002
Requirement 7: Gap 7 0 and .020
123
Motor Assembly
Gap 6 0 : Requirement 6
124
Horizontal Loop Diagram for

Requirement 6
125
Dimensions and Tolerances used

in Requirement 6
126
Calculating the mean value for the

requirement
The mean value for the gap is:
127
Worst Case Tolerancing Model
128
Resizing Tolerances Worst Case Model

There are two ways to reduce the tolerances in the stack-up
1. The designer could randomly change the tolerances and analyze
the new numbers
Or
2. If the original numbers were weighted the same, then all variable
tolerances (which are under the control of the designer) could be
multiplied by a resize factor to yield the minimum assembly gap.
This is the correct approach if the designer assigned original
tolerances that were equally producible.
129
Resizing Tolerances Worst Case Model
130
Resize Factor for the Worst Case Model
The new variable tolerances (t kv, wc, resized) are the old tolerances multiplied
by the factor Fwc.
t kv, wc, resized = Fwc * t kv
t kv, wc, resized = equal bilateral tolerance of the kth variable component in the
stackup after resizing using the worst case model
131
Graph of piece part tolerances versus assembly tolerance

(before and after resizing using the worst case model)
132
Resized Tolerances using the Worst case Model
Resizing
Factor:
.3929
133
The new maximum expected assembly gap for requirement 6, using

the resized tolerance is:
134
Worst- Case Tolerance Analysis

This is the most often used method. It is sometimes called as Maximum Minimum calculation method
Advantages:
It works on the condition of keeping the required deviation of an
assembly for any combination of dimensions of the components.
This method guarantees full assembly and working interchangeability
of components.
Disadvantages:
Due to the demand of higher accuracy of the assembly, it results in too
limited tolerances of components
High manufacturing costs.
This method is suitable for calculating dimensional circuits with a
small number of components. It is most often used in piece or smalllot production.
135
Normal Curve
136
Root Sum Square (RSS) Model
Distribution of actual size

(size deviation) of a part
Distribution of the actual values of the

closing dimension (Clearance)
137

The assumptions used in the model are:
The RSS equation is:
138
Dimensions and Tolerances used

in Requirement 6
139
140
Resizing the tolerances in the RSS model
The new variable tolerances (t kv, rss, resized) are the old tolerances multiplied by
the factor Frss.
t kv, rss, resized = Frss * t kv
t kv, rss, resized = equal bilateral tolerance of the kth variable component in the
stackup after resizing using the RSS model
141
Resized Tolerances using the RSS model
Resizing
factor is:
1.7984
142
Graph of piece part tolerances versus assembly tolerance

(before and after resizing using the RSS model)
143
Resizing the tolerances in the RSS model
144
Comparison of Worst Case and RSS models
145
Estimated Mean Shift Model

A new model for assembly tolerance accumulation has been proposed
which includes an estimate of expected bias . It is called the Estimated
Mean Shift method because the designer must estimate the bias for
each component in an assembly.
This is done by defining a zone about the midpoint of the tolerance
range, which is the probable location of the mean of a typical batch of
parts.
The midpoint tolerance zone is expressed as a fraction of the specified
tolerance range for the part dimension, (a number between 0 and 1.0).
If the process to be used to produce the part is closely controlled, a low
mean shift factor may be selected, say 0.1 to 0.2.
For less well-known processes, such as a part supplied by a new
vendor, a larger factor, say 0.7 or .8, could be selected to account for
the uncertainty.
For common processes the factor could be selected on the basis of
prior history from quality assurance data.
146
The location of the mean is not known precisely
147

Some parts may be nearly worst case, while others nearly straight
statistical. There is no need to penalize an entire assembly with a
worst limit analysis because of one poorly controlled component.
Thermal expansion, which must be treated as worst limit, may now
be included in a statistical assembly analysis.
Early in the design stage, when little manufacturing data are
available, conservative shift factors may be assigned. Later, during
production, as data becomes available, manufacturing systems
analysts may substitute more precise values. This may allow
tolerances to be loosened up so that production rates may be
increased.
148

ems
In this model,
The mean shift factor is a number between 0 and 1.0
It represents the amount that the midpoint is estimated to shift as
a fraction of the tolerance range.
If a process were closely controlled, we would use a small mean
shift, such as .2. If we know less about the process, we would use
higher mean shift factors.
149

Using a mean shift factor of .2 for the variable components and .8
for the fixed components, the expected variation for requirement 6
is:
150
If you have any queries please contact:
A Raghunath
Aditi Consultancy Services
Email: training@aditiconsultancy.com
Tel / Fax: 91 80 26580711; Mobile: 9449612671
151

Tolerance Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tolerance Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tolerance Analysis

Assembly, FEA, Wear ...

Dimension this part with a tolerance of 0.05mm between

Position tolerance of Multiple Holes

LIMITS and FITS

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Least Material Condition (LMC)

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Shaft Size Limits

Hole Size Limits

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

ISO SYSTEM OF TOLERANCES

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

ISO SYSTEM OF TOLERANCES

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Tolerance Zones IT5 to IT11

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

LIMITS AND FITS

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Fixing the Fit between Hole and Shaft

Fixing the Fit between Hole and Shaft

The design clearance value varies from 0.05 to 0.35 mm

The two size limits of the shaft would be

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Fixing the Fit between Hole and Shaft

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Worst Case Assembly Condition

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Maximum Gap Condition

Minimum Gap Condition

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore

Making a Tolerance Equal Bilateral

Aditi Consultancy Services, Bangalore