Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
reservoirs of the discovery in the study area, and the tectonic structures are also
completely different.
EEI is an extension of normalized elastic impedance (EI), and was introduced by
Whitcombe et al. (2002) to solve the physically meaningful angles of incidence of the
normalized EI, with the final goal the imaging of both fluid and lithology. The
relationship between EEI and reservoir properties is investigated by correlation analysis
between EEI logs and available petrophysical and lithology logs as a function of angle
Chi (). Once the optimum angle is determined, AVO analysis is carried out to obtain
intercept and gradient attributes, and their linear combination allows the determination of
the reservoir properties (Arcis, 2015)
The motivation for EEI study in this study area stems from the failure on two drilled wells
projected to intersect economic reservoir sands identified by the application of AVO
analysis.
Figure 1.1 Map showing the current concessions in Mozambique (left) and highlight of
the Rovuma Basin and the discoveries in Area 1 and Area 4 (right).
Figure 1.2 Map showing the location of 3D seismic survey that defines the study area,
outlined by the white rectangle. The blue lines are the inlines (South North) and
crosslines (East West) profiles used in this research. The green arrow indicates
northern direction.
1.2 Research objectives
In a broad sense, the objectives of this study are to apply EEI inversion technique to
identify, delineate and characterize two proved gas-sand reservoirs and two water filled
sands, and identify other prospective areas to address the location for new exploration
wells. These involve creating new petrophysical rock properties logs from the available
well log data and integrate them with seismic data to characterize the reservoirs. The
output of this study can be effectively used for further exploration and future field
development.
3
Figure 1.3 Pre-stack time migrated (PSTM) gathers converted to super gathers to
supress some noise effect. The displayed window corresponds to XL 6025, 6029, 6033
and 6037, between 1950 ms and 3450 ms around the well_2 location. The red line is the
P-wave velocity for well_2. Evident bias effect can be seen at ultrafar offsets from 2500
and 3300ms.
5
1.4 Methodology
The estimation of reservoir properties from well and seismic data generally consists of a
number of steps. For this study, the first step involves well log interpretation to establish
the basis for the relations between elastic properties and reservoirs properties. To achieve
this, the starting point is the interpretation of the available well log data (Table 1.1). This
step is followed by generation and interpretation of petrophysical parameters (bulk
modulus (k), shear modulus (), Poisson`s ratio, VpVs ratio, lambda-rho, mu-rho) and
reservoir parameters (porosity (), water saturation (Sw) and volume of shale (Vsh)). The
generated logs (petrophysical and reservoir parameters) are crossplotted together with the
original logs to discriminate the lithology, the fluid content and for delineation of the
reservoirs zones.
The second step concentrates on EEI logs and EEI reflectivity volumes generation
following the workflow in Figure 1.4. The EEI logs are generated based on crosscorrelation analysis to determine the best angle chi () for different petrophysical and
reservoir parameters previously generated during well log analysis (first step). On the
other hand, the EEI reflectivity volumes are generated based on intercept and gradient
attributes obtained from AVO analysis and determined angle ().
The last step of the study focuses on EEI inversion (Figure 1.4) and interpretation of the
results. The generated EEI petrophysical parameter volumes are inverted to understand
the characteristics of the reservoir in-situ and away from the borehole, to distinguish
different lithology and fluid content and identify new prospective targets.
Prior to the inversion, seismic to well calibration using check-shot data is performed to
correlate the seismic data with the rock properties. Details on wavelet extraction, the most
important element on seismic to well calibration, is demonstrated. By establishing this
relationship the value of seismic data is optimized and the accuracy of the reservoir
properties to be extrapolated away from the borehole are improved.
10