Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
D1
DB
D4
Vin
D2
D3
QB
Co
L
O
A
D
III.
the Load and returns through the body diode of Q2 back to the
mains.
The same cycle happens for Q3, but with a 180 phase
delay. During the negative half cycle, Q2 and Q4 turn on,
current flows through the inductors L2 and L1 (L4 and L3 for
the interleaved one). When the MOSFETs are off, energy is
released as current flows through D2 (and D4), through load
and back to the main through the body diode of Q1 (and Q3). A
detailed converter description is given in [22].
IV.
ANALYTICAL MODELLING
(1)
(2)
|sin | 1
|
|sin | 1
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
TABLE I.
SUMMARY OF COMPONENT RMS CURRENT STRESS FOR CONVENTIONAL BOOST AND BRIDGELESS BOOST TOPOLOGIES
Topology
Conventional PFC
Bridgeless PFC
97
48
Boost Inductor
97
48
Not Applicable
Boost Transistor
64
64
3
2
Not Applicable
2
2
TABLE II.
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
SUMMARY OF COMPONENT CURRENT STRESS FOR INTERLEAVED AND BRIDGELESS INTERLEAVED BOOST TOPOLOGIES
Topology
Interleaved PFC
Boost Inductor
43
43
Not Applicable
3
4
3
2 2.
Boost Transistor
26
Not Applicable
2
2
16
6
1.5
(7)
|sin |
64
(8)
|
3
4
2
2
|sin |
26
64
16
6
1.5
(9)
(10)
(11)
Bridgeless Boost
8.1W
0.0W
0.0W
8.1W
21.6W
5.4W
10.8W
0.0W
0.0W
10
6.9W
9.8W
6.9W
9.7W
30
20
28.7W
10.8W
30.0W
30.0W
Interleaved Boost
40
Total Losses
Intrinsic
Body Diodes
FETs
Fast Diodes
0
Regular
Diodes
Conventional Boost
50
60
47.7W
39.4W
42.3W
VI.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
V.
LOSS EVALUATION
PFC
Interleaved PFC
Interleaved
96
95
94
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
93
Topology
Bridgeless
97
# of
Device
Part # / Value
Regular Diode
25ETS08S
100
Fast Diode
IDB06S60C
99
MOSFET
IPB60R099CP
Inductor
800 H
Fast Diode
CSD10060
MOSFET
IPP60R099CP
Inductor
400 H
devices
98
Efficiency (%)
TABLE III.
98
500
99
100
Efficiency (%)
97
96
95
94
Interleaved PFC
Converter
Bridgeless Interleaved
PFC Converter
93
92
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
99
Figure 10: Efficiency vs. output power for Interleaved and Bridgeless
Interleaved PFC Boost Converter at Vin = 120 V
98
100
98
93
92
91
90
1200
94
1000
95
800
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
94
96
600
95
Bridgeless Interleaved
PFC Converter
97
400
Bridgeless Interleaved
PFC Converter
96
Interleaved PFC
Converter
99
Interleaved PFC
Converter
200
97
Efficiency (%)
Efficiency (%)
400
100
200
91
Figure 11: Efficiency vs. output power for Interleaved and Bridgeless
Interleaved PFC Boost Converter at Vin = 90 V
VII. CONCLUSION
A new high efficiency bridgeless interleaved PFC AC-DC
Boost converter topology has been presented in this paper. The
target application for the converter is the front-end AC-DC
converter in plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery chargers.
The proposed converter has been analyzed and its performance
characteristics have been presented. Also an analytical model
for four different topologies was developed, enabling the
calculation of power losses and efficiency calculation. A
breadboard converter circuit has been built to verify the proofof-concept. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency
of 98.2 %, which represents a 1% improvement compared to
the conventional interleaved PFC benchmark. The proposed
converter achieves significantly improved efficiency up to full
load across a wide input range of 90-240V.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]