SERCB耐震詳評程式中構件模擬與破壞形式之基本原理說明宋裕祺

SERCB
RC
National Taipei University of Technology

Pushover Analysis
Ar 48 mm 2
At 65 mm 2
Er 208 GPa
Et 104 GPa
( r )Y 248 MPa
( t )Y 310 MPa
( t )Y 310 MPa
( r )Y 248MPa
( r )Y 0.0012
( r )Y 0.0030
12kN
( Pr )Y ( r )Y Ar 248 MPa 48 mm 2 12 kN
( r )Y
248 MPa
L
(750 103 m)
Er
208 GPa
0.9mm
(r )Y ( r )Y L
0.90 mm
20kN
( Pt )Y ( t )Y At 310 MPa 65 106 m 2 20 kN
8kN
( )
310 MPa
( t )Y ( t )Y L t Y L
(750 103 )
Et
104 GPa
0.9mm
2.235 mm
2.235mm
CASE 1 u 0.005
( r )Y 248MPa
Pu 32kN
32kN
( t )Y 310 MPa
( r )Y 0.0012
u 0.005
( r )Y 0.003
u 0.005
P Pr Pt
r t
20kN
0.9mm
2.235mm
u 3.75mm
CASE 2 u 0.002
u 0.005
( r )Y 248MPa
( t )Y 310 MPa
( u ) 208MPa
( r )Y 0.0012
u 0.002
32kN
( r )Y 0.003
u 0.005
Pu 25.3kN
P Pr Pt
r t
20kN
0.9mm
2.235mm
1 . 5 mm
Mb
M by
M vy
PUSHOVER
Mv
D E
M vu
B
M cr A
cr i y
SERCB
Pushover
Mi
M by
Mb
Mv
PUSHOVER
M vu
M cr B
cr
SERCB
Pushover
M
M vy
Mv
M vu
PUSHOVER
M bu
M cr
10
M by
Mb
A cr y
u
SERCB
Pushover
10
ETABSPUSHOVER
MIDASMIDASPUSHOVER
()
C
E
1
C
D
C
E
D
2 D
2
E
11
11
1.
Transform Capacity Curve to Capacity Spectrum
(Capacity Curve)
Sa
roof
12
(Capacity Spectrum)
Sd
V
1W
roof
PF1 roof ,1
Sa
Sd
12
Find PGA which every performance

is corresponded
output
( S a )elastic C A PGA
Sa
( S a )elastic
CV PGA
Tn
elastic
(Sa )inelastic
Inelastic
Performance
point
Input
(Sd )inelastic
Sd
13
S a PGA C S DS
(475)
Sai PGA C / FU S DS / FU
3
2.5
C
PGA
1.5
1
PGA
0.5
0
0
PERIOD ( sec. )
S a S DS PGA 2.5
PGA S DS / 2.5 0.4 S DS
S ai S DS / FU PGA 2.5 / FU
PGA S DS / 2.5 0.4 S14DS
14
(PGA)
B1 or B s
( S a ) elastic
( S a ) inelastic
S a inelastic
S d inelastic
a pi
d pi
a pi
(PGA)(
S aD & S DS ) T
5% B B
eff
15
15
(PGA)
T T0D
PGA
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
a pi Bs ( eff ) a pi Bs ( eff )
2.5S aD (T )
2.5
(
)
S DS
T0D
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
T 2.5T0D
PGA
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
a pi B1 ( eff )
2.5SaD (T )
(
)
S DS
2.5T0D
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
PGA
a pi B1 ( eff )
2.5S D1 (T )
(
)
S DS T
16
(PGA)
T T0D
PGA
Bs ( eff )
T0D
B1 ( eff )
a pi Bs ( eff ) a pi Bs ( eff )
2.5S aD (T )
2.5
(
)
S DS
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
T 2.5T0D
PGA
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
a pi B1 ( eff )
2.5S aD (T )
(
)
S DS
2.5T0D
Bs ( eff )
B1 ( eff )
PGA
a pi B1 ( eff )
(
2.5T0D
)
T
17
PGA
PGA-Displacement
PGA
= 0.353g
0.4
PGA (g)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
10
Displacement (cm)
Yu-Chi Sung, Chin-Kuo Su, Chuan-Wei Wu, and I-Chau Tsai, PerformanceBased Damage Assessment of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings,
submitted to the Journal of China Institute of Engineer.SCIEI
18
Capacity Curve
Vi , roof
Later
al
Forc
e
V
Collapse
Lateral Displacement
Capacity Spectrum
Sai , Sdi
Sa
19
Sd
0.4SDSI
PGA
0.4SDSI
20
10

FEMA-273
E
Q QC
b
a
1.0
C
B
IO
LS
CP
or
21
Analytical results based on FEMA-273

Drift ratio (%)
Lateral force (kN)
-8
-6
-4
-2
600
600
500
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
-100
-100
-200
-200
Specimen A
-300
-300
Experiment
-400
-400
FEMA 273
-500
-500
-600
-600
-300
-200
-100
100
200
300
Displacement (mm)
22
11
(Kawaishma)
fc
0 c co
1 n1
fc Ec c 1 c
n co
f 'c
f c 'c
co c sp
0.5 f c c
'
f c f c E des c co
sp c
co
sp cc
cu
fc 0
23
(Elastic-Plastic)
fs
s y
fy
f s Es s
y s sh
fs f y
y
sh
s
24
12
25
26
13

Specimen BMR1-R
Specimen BMC1
600*750 mm
D = 800mm
550mm
600mm
550mm
34-#6
#3@7
D = 760mm
#3@10
2001 )
2000 )
(1300mm)
#3@7
(770mm)
(
1999 )
#3@10 (2900mm)
Section
A
(840mm)
750mm
Section
A
45cm
750mm
75mm
2400*1800mm
2450*1800mm
27
Specimen BMR1-R
Specimen BMC1
Drift Ratio (%)
Drift Ratio (%)

-4
-2
-6
-4
-2
600
600
600
500
500
500
500
400
400
400
400
300
300
300
300
200
200
200
200
100
100
100
100
Lateral Force (kN)
Lateral Force (kN)
-6
600
-100
-200
-200
-200
-300
-300
BMR1-R
-300
-100
-100
-100
-200
BMC1
-400
NARC-2004
-400
-400
NARC-2004
-500
-500
P.P.H = Proposed plastic hinge
-400
-600
-600
P.P.H for SAP-2000
P.P.H for SAP-2000
-500
-300
Experiment
Experiment
-500
-600
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
50
100
150
200
250
-600
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
50
100
150
200
250
Displacement (mm)
Displacement (mm)
(2004)
28
14
29
Pushover Analysis Results of Columns

-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
20
40
60
80
-100
100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
200
200
200
200
160
160
160
160
160
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
TOP2
TOP29
-80
-80
EXP
-120
-40
-40
EXP
-120
-120
ANA
-160
-200
-200
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
100
120
80
-120
-120
TOP75
EXP
-80
-80
-120
-120
-160
-200
-200
-200
-200
-200
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
Displacement (mm)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
-20
20
40
60
80
60
80
-100
100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
-100
100
200
200
200
160
160
160
160
120
120
120
120
120
80
40
0
-40
-40
TOP11
-80
EXP
-120
80
80
40
40
0
-40
-40
-80
-80
-120
-120
TOP68
EXP
ANA
Lateral Force (kN)
200
160
120
Lateral Force (kN)
200
160
40
-200
-80
-60
-40
-20
80
80
40
40
0
-40
-40
-80
-80
-120
-120
20
40
60
80
100
Displacement (mm)
200
80
-120
-160
-100
100
Displacement (mm)
40
-80
EXP
ANA
-160
-60
-40
TOP76
ANA
-160
-80
-40
-160
Displacement (mm)
-120 -100 -80
-80
-160
-100
-80
-80
ANA
-160
-100
-40
-40
Lateral Force (kN)
-40
-40
Lateral Force (kN)
200
160
Lateral Force (kN)
200
160
-80
Lateral Force (kN)
-20
200
160
Lateral Force (kN)
Lateral Force (kN)
-100
200
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
200
200
160
160
120
120
80
80
40
40
0
-40
-40
TOP77
-80
TOP74
-80
-80
EXP
-120
EXP
-120
-120
ANA
ANA
ANA
-80
-160
-160
-160
-160
-160
-160
-160
-160
-200
-200
-200
-200
-200
-200
-200
-200
-120 -100 -80
-60
-40
-120 -100 -80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
120
-100
-80
-60
-40
60
80
100
120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
20
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
Displacement (mm)
-20
20
-20
20
40
60
80
100
40
60
80
100
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
Displacement (mm)
Displacement (mm)
-20
20
-120 -100 -80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
120
200
200
200
200
200
200
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
-40
-40
TOP13
-80
-80
-120
-120
-160
-160
-200
-200
-80
EXP
-120
-40
-40
TOP78
-60
-40
-20
20
40
Displacement (mm)
60
80
-120
-120
-160
-160
-160
-200
-200
-200
-120
-120
-160
-160
-200
-200
EXP
ANA
100
120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
Displacement (mm)
40
60
80
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
Displacement (mm)
40
60
80
-40
TOP10
-80
EXP
-120
ANA
ANA
100
-40
-80
-80
ANA
-120 -100 -80
TOP30
-80
-80
EXP
-40
-40
Lateral Force (kN)
200
160
Lateral Force (kN)
200
Lateral Force (kN)
Lateral Force (kN)
Displacement (mm)
-20
100
-160
-200
-120 -100 -80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
120
Displacement (mm)
30
15
RC
TOP001
TP010
20
15
15
10
F orce(T on)
5
0
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
-5
F orce(T on)2
10
5
0
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
-5
-10
-0.0492, -11.4487
-0.0553, -8.4426
SAP2000
-15
SAP2000
-10
-20
-15
Disp(m)
Disp(m)
TP075
TP030
15
20
15
0
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
-5
-0.0196272, -7.9774
0.08
0
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
-0.0174, -7.3173
SAP2000
SAP2000
-10
-10
-0.058, -12.2261
-15
Disp(m)
0.08
-5
31
-15
National Taipei UniversityDips

of(m)
Technology
JSCE-4
Drift Ratio (%)
-8
Lateral Force (kN)
-0.08
-6
-4
-2
200
200
175
175
150
150
125
125
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
-25
-25
-50
-50
-75
-75
JSCE-4
-100
-100
Experiment
-125
-125
NARC-2004
-150
-150
P.P.H for SAP-2000

-175
-175
-200
-200
-100
-75
-50
-25
25
50
75
100
Displacement (mm)
Displacement Ductility (Du/Dy)
-12
Yu-Chi Sung, Kuang-Yen Liu, Chin-Kuo Su, I-Chau Tsai, and KuoChen Chang , A Study on Pushover Analyses of Reinforced Concrete
Columns, submitted to the International Journal of Structural
Engineering and Mechanics.SCIEI
Yielding Ratio of the Strain on Longitudinal Reinforcement

on Tension Side
F orce(T on)
F orc e(T on)2
10
10
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
10
12
-1
-1
JSCE-4
-2
-2
FORCE
Experiment_CH101
-3
-3
Experiment_CH102
-4
Experiment_CH103
-5
Experiment_CH104
-4
-5
NARC-2004
-6
-6
-72
-60
-48
-36
-24
-12
12
24
36
48
60
Displacement (mm)
72
32
16

-
P
M D , PD
PD
Pu
M EQ, PD PEQ
Pu
M
Mu
33
M
M u ,UL
M y ,UL
M u , DL
M y , DL
M yi , DL
C
DL : A B C D E
UL : A B D E
Proposed model : A - B - C - D - E
M cr
B
cryi,DLy,DL y,UL
u,UL u,DL
34
17
Case1.(fc`=350)-(10ton~30ton)
Case2.(fc`=150~350)-(16ton)
JSCE4
35
Case1.(fc`=350)-(10ton~30ton)
JSCE10
JSCE4--Varying Axial Force=10ton~30ton
25
JSCE11
JSCE12
Axial Force=30
JSCE13
JSCE14
20
JSCE15
JSCE16
Moment(Ton-m)
JSCE17
JSCE18
15
JSCE19
Axial Force=10
JSCE20
JSCE21
JSCE23
10
JSCE24
JSCE25
JSCE26
JSCE27
JSCE28
JSCE29
JSCE30
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
Rotation
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
36
18
Case1
Variation AxialForce
30
Moment(Ton-m)
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ax 15000
ial
Fo 20000
rc e
(kg
f) 25000
30000
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
on
0.035
tati
Ro
0.040
37
(fc`=350)-(1ton~360ton)
30
330
330ton
340
25
Moment(ton-m)
350
360
700
20
15
600
360ton
10
500
Axial Force(ton)
5
0
0
0.005
0.01
400
0.015
0.02
0.025
Rotation300
30
200
1
100
100ton
10
Moment(ton-m)
25
20
30
20
40
50
60
-100
15
70
80
10
90
-200
10ton
100
-40
-30
-20
-10
10
20
30
Moment(ton-m)
0
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
Rotation
0.04
0.05
40
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
320
330
340
350
360
PMC
38
19
Ratio
Axial Force
Ratio
20(ton)
0.500126
200(ton)
0.905517
30
0.572653
210
0.910601
40
0.617576
220
0.923186
50
0.654692
230
0.93012
240
0.936486
250
0.940281
260
0.94852
270
0.953338
60
0.677131
70
0.701033
80
0.721649
90
0.737022
100
0.752531
110
0.773794
120
0.788129
130
0.797386
140
0.821175
280
0.962182
290
0.983667
300
0.983783
310
0.983838
0.984352
0.984071
150
0.838802
320
160
0.851769
330
170
0.869229
340
0.98372
180
0.875656
350
0.994867
190
0.895279
360
0.993796
M
D
C
B
Ratio
K1
K2
K2
K1
K 2 Ratio K1
Axial Force-Stiffness Ratio
1.2
Stiffness Ratio
Axial Force
0.8
Ratio
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
39
300
350
400
Axial
National Taipei University
ofForce(ton)
Technology
Case2.(fc`=150~350)-(16ton)
20
JSCE4-Varying Fc'=150~350kgf/cm^2
JSCE150
Fc=350
18
JSCE160
JSCE170
16
JSCE180
JSCE190
JSCE200
14
JSCE210
Moment(Ton-m)
JSCE220
Fc=150
12
JSCE230
JSCE240
JSCE250
10
JSCE260
JSCE270
JSCE280
JSCE290
JSCE300
JSCE310
JSCE320
JSCE330
JSCE340
JSCE350
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
Rotation
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
40
20
Case2
Variation Fc'
30
Moment(Ton-m)
25
20
15
10
0
200
Fc' 250
300
350
0.04
0.03
0.02
n
Rotatio
0.01
41
BMDF
42
21
Frame Structure varying axial force
43
Plastic Hinge
300
300
250
250
200
Moment (kN-m)
COL1_top
150
300
Specimen: BMDF
M3 hinge for COL1_top
100
250
COL2_top
150
350
Specimen: BMDF
M3 hinge for COL2_top
100
300
Service State (DL)
Service State (DL)
Ultimate State (UL)
50
Ultimate State (UL)
50
FINAL
250
FINAL
0.00
150 0.03
0.06
COL1_bot
0.09
0.12
0.15
200
COL2_bot
0.00
Rotation (rad)
Specimen: BMDF
M3 hinge for COL1_bot
100
Moment (kN-m)
200
Moment (kN-m)
Moment (kN-m)
200
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
Specimen: BMDF
M3 hinge for COL2_bot
100
Service State (DL)
Service State (DL)
Ultimate State (UL)
Ultimate State (UL)
50
0.15
Rotation (rad)
150
50
FINAL
FINAL
0
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
Rotation (rad)
0.12
0.15
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
Rotation (rad)
0.12
44
0.15
22
Analysis Results
Drift Ratio (%)
Lateral Force (kN)
600
600
500
500
400
400
300
300
BMDF
Experiment envelope
200
200
P.P.H for SAP-2000 (service state, DL)

P.P.H for SAP-2000 (ultimate state, UL)
P.P.H for SAP-2000 (interpolation, FINAL)
100
100

0
0
0
25
50
75
100
Displacement (mm)
Yu-Chi Sung, Kuang-Yen Liu, Chin-Kuo Su, I-Chau Tsai, and Kuo-Chen Chang , A Study on Pushover Analyses of
Reinforced Concrete Columns, submitted to the International Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics.SCI
45
EI
Time history analysis
Takeda
MultiLinear
Plastic
46
23
Pseudodynamic test of
reinforced concrete columns
47
Ground acceleration and velocity

for TCU075TCU102
Ground acceleration and velocity for TCU075
0
10
15
20
25
Ground acceleration and velocity for TCU102

0
30
800
15
20
25
30
800
600
600
600
400
400
400
400
200
200
200
200
-200
-400
-600
-600
-600
-800
-800
-400
-400
-600
-800
10
10
15
15
20
20
2525
-800
00
3030
Time (sec)
-400
-200
55
-200
-200
00
Ground Acceleration (cm/sec^2)
600
55
1010
1515
20 20
25 25
30 30
Time (sec)
300
300
200
200
200
200
100
100
100
100
300
-100
-100
-200
-200
-300
-300
0
10
15
Time (sec)
20
25
30
Ground Velocity (cm/sec)
Ground Acceleration (cm/sec^2)
10
Peak Ground Acceleration = 0.7 g
Peak Ground Acceleration = 0.8 g
Ground Velocity (cm/sec)
800
800
300
-100
-100
-200
-200
-300
-300
0
10
15
20
25
48
30
Time (sec)
24
Specimen A cyclic loading test and analysis result
49
Specimen B
Pseudodynamic and analysis results for as-built Specimen subject to TCU075
0
10
15
20
25
30
80
80
59.51 (Experimental)
59.01 (Analytical)
60
Drift ratio (%)

0
Displacement (mm)
-1
40
20
20
600
600
500
500
400
400
300
300
-40
200
200
-60
100
0
-20
-100
-100
160000
-200
-200
140000
Experimental Result
-400
-500
-500
-600
-600
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
SAP2000 Analytical Result
-80
0
10
15
20
25
10
Time
15(sec)
20
25
30
30
160000
140000
E I E K E S E D EY
E N EK ES E D
120000
120000
-400
-80
-60
Experimental Result
Specimen B
-300
Specimen B
-40
Specimen B
(Analytical) -68.27
-80
-300
-20
(Experimental) -68.32
100
80
Energy (kN-mm)
Lateral force (kN)
-2
60
40
100000
100000
98228
80000
80000
EY
60000
EI
Displacement (mm)
EI
60000
56481
EI
40000
EN
40000
EI
20000
20000
15.15 sec
0
10
15
20
25
30
Time (sec)
50
25
Specimen C
Pseudodynamic and analysis results for as-built Specimen subject to TCU102
0
Drift ratio (%)

-4
-3
-2
-1
10
15
20
25
30
150
150
120
120
600
600
90
90
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
Displacement (mm)
Lateral force (kN)
500
100
55.16 (Experimental)
53.24 (Analytical)
60
30
0
-30
-30
(Experimental) -60.98
-60
-60
(Analytical) -67.26
Specimen C
-90
60
30
-90
Experimental Result
-120
-100
-100
-200
-200
-120
-150
-150
0
10
15
20
25
30
20
25
30
Time (sec)
-300
Specimen C
-300
-400
Experimental Result
-400
10
15
420000
SAP_2000 Analytical Result
-500
-500
-600
-600
420000
360000
360000
Specimen C
E I E K E S E D EY
-120
-90
-60
-30
30
60
90
120
150
Energy (kN-mm)
-150
Displacement (mm)
Yu-Chi Sung, Shuenn-Yih Chang and Chin-Kuo Su,

Analytical and Experimental Responses of
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns under Strong
Near-Fault Ground Motion submitted to Journal of
Earthquake Engineering.SCIEI
EN EK ES ED
300000
300000
EN EK ES ED
240000
240000
180000
180000
124268
120000
EI
60000
EI
10
60000
44300
EI
EN
EI
120000
EY
16.27 sec
15
20
25
30
Time (sec)
51
RC
Frame structure
Frame structure
infilled with RC wall
[Bending]
RC wall
[Bending and Shear]
(h/d > 0.8)
Shear
Bending
(h/d<= 0.8)
Shear
52
Pushover analysis is highly sensitive to the

structural nonlinearity of frame and RC wall52
26
RC Structural Wall
d
Equivalent diagonal structural

strut of an RC wall
53
53
RC
-
Top ,Old Top , New
No
Bottom Bottom
Bottom
Yes
No
Bottom M Bottom P M i
M i i i ,Old
Yes
i ,Old i , New
P , N , i ,Old M i
M i i i , New
54
i ,Old i , New
No
Flow Chart
Bottom Max
Yes
STOP
54
27
Equilibrium (1/2)
Based on the theory of fixed angle softened truss model, the
angle of cracks in the postcracking concrete coincides with
the angle
h

Variable
tan 1
d
lc , tc , ltc
55
h / d 0.8
h / d 0.8
( d r )
55
Equilibrium (2/2)
The equilibrium can be expressed as following Eqs.,
according to the Mohr circle of stress.
lc d cos2 r sin2
tc d sin2 r cos2
ltc ( d r )sin cos

Vc ltc bw d
The total shear force applied on the RC wall

V Vc Vs ltc bw d Ast ft
56
d
tan
s
56
28
Compatibility
Based on the theory of fixed angle softened truss model, the
compatibility can be expressed as following Eqs., according to
the Mohr circle of strain.
l d cos 2 r sin 2
t d sin 2 r cos 2
lt / 2 ( d r )sin cos
57
57
Constitutive Laws of Concrete(1/3)

Both the strength and stiffness of cracked reinforced concrete in
compression are lower than those of uniaxial compressed concrete.
Softening effect on the biaxial constitute laws of concrete
58
0.9
1 600 r
58
29
Constitutive Laws of
Concrete(2/3)
d / 0 1
2
d
d
0 0
d f 'c 2
d / 0 1
/ 1 2
0
d f 'c 1 d

2 / 1
Belarbi and Hsu

59
0.9
1 600 r
59
Constitutive Laws of Concrete(3/3)

r cr
r Ec r
r cr
Vecchio and Collins
60
cr
0.4
r f cr
60
30
Constitutive Laws of
Reinforcement
s y
f s Es s
s y
fs f y
Vs Ast f t
61
d
tan
s
61
l d cos 2 r sin 2
-0.004
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
300
300
250
t d sin 2 r cos 2
V = Vc + Vs
stress (kg/cm^2)
lt / 2 ( d r )sin cos
200
150
200
Concrete in compression
Concrete in tension
100
100
50
-50
-100
-100
-0.004
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
Vc ltc bw d
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
l d cos 2 r sin 2
t d sin 2 r cos 2
lt ( d r )sin cos
strain
-0.005 -0.004 -0.003 -0.002 -0.001 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
4000
4000
3000
3000
d
Vs Ast ft tan
s
stress (kg/cm^2)
2000
2000
1000
1000
-1000
-1000
Reinforcement in tension
-2000
Reinforcement in compression
-3000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-4000
-0.005 -0.004 -0.003 -0.002 -0.001 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
strain
62
62
31
RC (h/d<0.8)
2
f 'c 2 d d
0 0

d
1
If
o
V Vu 200
If > 1 and t > y

o
-Vu 200
/ 0 1
f 'c 1 d

V =V +
V 2 / 1
d d _ last d
r Ec r
2

l d cos
r
r _ last
0.4
cr
r _ last r
sin 2 r d _ last d
r f cr
r
V (Vc Vs ) Tol
2
2
2
t d sin
0.9 r cos 2 lc d cos r sin

0.06
1 600
lt / 2 ( d r )sin cos tc d sin2 r cos2
r
d , r
-0.0035
ltc f( E
d
r )sin cos
s
s s
Vc ltc bw Vd Vu
fs f y
d
d , r t , ltc
d , r ltc V c
ts t
ts f ts Vs
63
Vs Ast f t
d
tan
s
63
Aeff of equivalent diagonal

structural strut
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.0
250000
200000
200000
150000
150000
100000
100000
300000
300000
200000
200000
force (kg)
Lateral Force (kg)
0.0
250000
100000
100000
Specimen 145-6
50000
strut curve
50000
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
displacement (cm)
1.0
Displacement (cm)
V Vc Vs
M ( lt h)
( lt h)
Vstrut
(h/d > 0.8)
strut cos
(h/d < 0.8)
Ec Aeff
L
64
V
cos
Aeff
L
Ec
64
32
Pushover Analysis Results

(specimen 140-1)
Shear strength of RC wall
Pushover Analysis Results
65
65
Case Studies(h/d<0.8)
Specime
n
H(cm)
d(cm)
tw(cm)
fc'(Mpa)
fyv(Mpa)
fyh(Mpa)
beam
column
4b2-3
0.005
0.005
56
122
19.5
359
359
1310
1310
4b2-4
0.005
56
178
26.4
359
359
1310
1310
0.0066
180
396
12
20.6
572
572
3636
3636
0.0066
180
396
12
20.8
572
572
3636
3636
0.0066
180
396
12
21.3
572
572
3636
3636
0.0033
180
396
12
19.6
572
572
3636
3636
0.0033
180
396
12
20.8
572
572
3636
3636
0.0066
180
396
12
20.5
284
284
3636
3636
0.0066
180
396
12
19.6
284
284
3636
3636
0.0074
180
396
12
20.9
397
397
3636
3636
0.0031
60
133
35.6
286
286
1313
1313
0.0063
60
133
30.4
286
286
1313
1313
0.0126
60
133
31.5
286
286
1313
1313
t=30
=0008
0.005
0.006
6
0.006
6
0.006
6
0.003
3
0.003
3
0.006
9
0.006
9
0.007
7
0.003
1
0.006
3
0.012
6
0.008
4
0.0084
60
133
32.8
286
286
1313
1313
t=20
=0006
0.006
3
0.0063
60
133
30.1
286
286
1313
1313
t=20
=0012
0.012
6
0.0126
60
133
33.7
286
286
1313
66
1313
140-1
141-2
142-3
143-4
144-5
145-6
146-7
147-8
=0003
=0006
=0012
66
33

-0.004
StressStressStrain
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
-0.002
100
100
80
80
60
60
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
6000
-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
4000
8000
4000
3000
6000
3000
2000
4000
2000
5000
4000
40
20
20
-20
2000
-20
1000
1000
0
-1000
-40
Concrete in compression
-1000
Specimen 143-4
-2000
Specimen 143-4
-40
stress (kg/cm^2)
40
stress (kg/cm^2)
stress (kg/cm^2)
3000
1000
2000
-2000
L-reinforcement in tension
T-reinforcement in tension
L-reinforcement in compression
-3000
-1000
Specimen 143-4
-2000
-4000
-3000
-6000
-4000
-8000
T-reinforcement in compression
-2000
Concrete in tension
-60
-60
-4000
-80
-80
-5000
-100
-100
-6000
-0.003
-0.004
-0.003
-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
-0.002
0.004
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
-3000
-4000
-0.030
strain
-0.020
-0.010
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
strain
strain
-2.000
-1.500
-1.000
-0.500
0.000
0.500
1.000
1.500
2.000
-0.020
200000
160000
160000
120000
120000
80000
80000
40000
40000
-0.010
0.000
80000
60000
40000
40000
20000
-40000
-40000
-80000
-20000
-80000
reinforcement in tension
-40000
-120000
-160000
-160000
-200000
-200000
0.500
1.000
1.500
reinforcement in compression
force (kg)
-1
-60000
-80000
-80000
-0.020
-0.010
0.000
0.010
-8000
T-reinforcement in compression
-12000
-16000
-20000
-24000
0.020
-20000
-0.500 -0.400 -0.300 -0.200 -0.100 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500
displacement (cm)
Longitudinal
reinforcements
Transverse
reinforcements
3
200000
160000
160000
120000
120000
80000
80000
40000
40000
Beam
Column
Shear
0
-40000
Specimen 143-4
Total in tension
-80000
wall
-80000
Total in compression
67
-4000
T-reinforcement in tension
-16000
displacement (cm)
200000
-40000
-4000
-8000
-40000
-60000
2.000
Concrete
-2
-12000
displacement (cm)
-3
4000
4000
Specimen 143-4
-120000
0.000
8000
-20000
Specimen 143-4
concrete in compression
-0.500
16000
8000
concrete in tension
-1.000
20000
12000
20000
Specimen 143-4
-0.500 -0.400 -0.300 -0.200 -0.100 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500
20000
16000
12000
-1.500
0.020
60000
24000
-2.000
0.010
80000
force (kg)
force (kg)
200000
force (kg)
ForceForceDisplacement
-120000
-120000
-160000
-160000
-200000
67
-200000
-3
-2
-1
displacement (cm)
PushoverAnalysisResults(h/d<0.
8)
Over-estimation
Under-estimation
Good prediction
68
68
34
PushoverAnalysisResults(h/d<0.8)
69
69
Case Studies(h/d>0.8)
70
(2002
)
(2002)
70
35
Analysis Results(h/d>0.8)
80
70
60
(kN)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
(cm)
71
71
R*
V
Ve ISaDW
U R*
Y 1.2
Ra
V U I S a D W / FU
U
Y '
a
R 1
1
Y
1.5
VY IS aDW / (1.4 FU )
Vd IS aDW / (1.4Y FU )
d Y ' Y
72
36
S a PGA C S DS
(475)
Sai PGA C / FU S DS / FU
3
2.5
C
PGA
1.5
1
PGA
0.5
0
0
PERIOD ( sec. )
S ai S DS / FU PGA 2.5 / FU
PGA S DS / 2.5 0.4 S73DS
S a S DS PGA 2.5
PGA S DS / 2.5 0.4 S DS
SERCB
973
ATC-40(PushOver Method)
ETABS(V8.4.8V9.0)MIDAS GEN(V761)
PUSHOVER

Q & A
()
http://sercb.dyndns.org/SERCBWeb/Default.aspx
74
74
37
62 p.p. 81-98 200712
21-44
50 pp.35~472004 12
46 pp.47~652004 4
Min-Chun Lai, Yu-Chi Sung, A study on pushover analysis of frame structure
infilled with low-rise reinforced concrete wall, Journal of Mechanics, Vol.24, 2008,
pp.437-449,
Yu-Chi Sung, Chin-Kuo Su, Chuan-Wei Wu, and I-Chau Tsai, Performance-Based
Damage Assessment of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Journal of the
Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 29, No. 1, Jan, 2006, p.p.51~62 .
Yu-Chi Sung, Kuang-Yen Liu, Chin-Kuo Su, I-Chau Tsai, and Kuo-Chen Chang, "A
Study on Pushover Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Journal of
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 1, Sep, 2005, p.p.35~52
75
Thank you for your attention
76
38

SERCB耐震詳評程式中構件模擬與破壞形式之基本原理說明 宋裕祺

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SERCB耐震詳評程式中構件模擬與破壞形式之基本原理說明 宋裕祺

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SERCB

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

( Pt )Y ( t )Y At 310 MPa 65 106 m 2 20 kN

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

Transform Capacity Curve to Capacity Spectrum

National Taipei University of Technology

Find PGA which every performance

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

Analytical results based on FEMA-273

Lateral force (kN)

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

Drift Ratio (%)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

P.P.H = Proposed plastic hinge

P.P.H for SAP-2000

P.P.H for SAP-2000

P.P.H = Proposed plastic hinge

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei University of Technology

Pushover Analysis Results of Columns

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

-120 -100 -80

-120 -100 -80

-120 -100 -80

-120 -100 -80

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

Lateral Force (kN)

National Taipei University of Technology

National Taipei UniversityDips

Lateral Force (kN)

P.P.H for SAP-2000

Yielding Ratio of the Strain on Longitudinal Reinforcement

SERCB耐震詳評程式中構件模擬與破壞形式之基本原理說明宋裕祺

SERCB耐震詳評程式中構件模擬與破壞形式之基本原理說明宋裕祺