You are on page 1of 193

Stan J.

Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 9, 2016
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States,
Washington, D. C. 20543
Re:

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Dear Clerk,
I am filing this Petition under duress and am aware of some deficiencies. Would you kindly
docket the Petition and I will cure the deficiencies at a later time. I am in extreme pain and want
to make sure that the assaults on my person are not successful in denying my right to appeal.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

P
usps.com

062S0000000101

Click-N-Ship

Mailed from 17603

9410 8036 9930 0081 8350 81 0088 0000 0022 0543


$8.80
US POSTAGE

Flat Rate Env


Signature
Confirmation

08/09/2016

0006

Expected Delivery Date: 08/11/16

C000

PRIORITY MAIL 2-DAY

STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812

SIGNATURE REQUIRED

SHIP

WASHINGTON DC 20543-0001

TO: CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 1ST ST NE

USPS SIGNATURE TRACKING #

9410 8036 9930 0081 8350 81

Electronic Rate Approved #038555749

Cut on dotted line.

Click-N-Ship Label Record

Instructions

1. Each Click-N-Ship label is unique. Labels are to be

Signature Confirmation :

used as printed and used only once. DO NOT PHOTO


COPY OR ALTER LABEL.

2. Place your label so it does not wrap around the edge of


the package.
3. Adhere your label to the package. A self-adhesive label
is recommended. If tape or glue is used, DO NOT TAPE
OVER BARCODE. Be sure all edges are secure.
4. To mail your package with PC Postage, you
may schedule a Package Pickup online, hand to
your letter carrier, take to a Post Office, or
drop in a USPS collection box.
5. Mail your package on the "Ship Date" you
selected when creating this label.

9410 8036 9930 0081 8350 81


Trans. #:
Print Date:
Ship Date:
Expected
Delivery Date:

From:

To:

381172223
08/09/2016
08/09/2016
08/11/2016

Priority Mail Postage:


Signature Confirmation
(Electronic Rate)
Total

$6.45
$2.35
$8.80

STAN CATERBONE
AMG
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
CLERK
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 1ST ST NE
WASHINGTON DC 20543-0001

* Retail Pricing Priority Mail rates apply. There is no fee for USPS Tracking service
on Priority Mail service with use of this electronic rate shipping label. Refunds for
unused postage paid labels can be requested online 30 days from the print date.

Thank you for shipping with the United States Postal Service!
Check the status of your shipment on the USPS Tracking page at usps.com

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,


Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


STANLEY J. CATERBONE
PETITIONER
v.
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention, et.al.,
RESPONDANT

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CASE NO. __________


U.S. Third Circuit Court Case No. 16-1001
U.S. District Court Case No. 15-03984
:

:
:

A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI


AND NOW, on this 8th day of August, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI according to Rules of Procedures of the United States Supreme Court and I, Stanley J.
Caterbone do hereby declare that this Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari should be reviewed due to it's
importance to the public of the issue.
Date: August 8, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States,
Washington, D. C. 20543

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 1 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Case No. 15-03984 Habeus Corpus for Stan J. Caterbone
Order of April 5, 2016
SUBMISSION 16-1001 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case To The
Supreme Court of the United States- A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, August
7, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, August 7, 2016 for Case No. 16-1001
Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case To The Supreme Court of the
United States
2. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULES FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS August 7,
2016
3. ORDER re 16-1001 Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case - ORDER re
Petition For Rehearing DENIED Judge Michael Fisher July 8, 2016
1. 16-1001 DOCKET SHEET re Third Circuit Court of Appeals Habeus Corpus Case
- July 13, 2016
4. ORDER DISMISSAL in US District Court December 29, 2015 re Case No. 15-03984
Petitioner Stanley J. Caterbone Writ of Habeus Corpus
5. 15-03984 DOCKET as of December 16, 2015 re Petitioner Stanley J. Caterbone
Writ of Habeus Corpus
6. December 10, 2015 - Recorded Docket Entry
7. December 10, 2015 - PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS
8. Avanced Media Group Anti-Harassment Legislation and Executive Summary
1. Letter from Pennsylvania Representative Mike Sturla re Organized Stalking Bill
of June 8, 2009
2. Cover Page for Executive Summary
3. Executive Summary
4. Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 2 of 190


Table of Contents Page 1 of 2

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2


5. History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual
6. The Courts and the United States Legal System
7. Family History
8. The Public Record
9. Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
10.Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015
11.29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987
12.26 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES
13.Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010 Redacted
Version
14.Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010
15.Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996
16.Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT
OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL
LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT
for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 3 of 190


Table of Contents Page 2 of 2

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE

U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT
for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474

U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015;
1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 4
2 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI


QUESTION NUMBER ONE: - Is the Petitioner a Prisoner if not in a Conventional Prison?
ARGUMENT NUMBER ONE: - Federal Habeus Corpus Statutes Defining Prisoner.
Federal Habeas Corpus statutes prescribed in 28 2242 as prescribed by law states the following
according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal habeas corpus statutes states: where any person
may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty or law
of the United States.
Birth of the Modern Writ. In 1867, Congress substantially increased the jurisdiction of federal courts
to issue the writ by authorizing its issuance in all cases, state or federal, where any person may
be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty or law of
the United States.16 Originally, habeas corpus permitted collateral attack upon a prisoner's
conviction only if the sentencing court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Shortly after 1867, however,
the Supreme Court began to recognize a growing number of circumstances where courts were said to
have acted beyond their jurisdiction because some constitutional violation had extinguished or "voided"
their jurisdiction.17 This development was of limited benefit to most prisoners, since most were
confined under state convictions and relatively few of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution were
thought to apply against the states. Even when a constitutional claim was available, state prisoners
could not be granted federal habeas relief until all possibility of state judicial relief trial, appellate, and
post conviction had been exhausted.181
FOOTNOTES: 1 16 That the several courts of the United States, and the several justices and judges of
such courts, within their respective jurisdictions, in addition to the authority already conferred by law,
shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus in all cases where any person may be restrained of his
or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States; and it shall be
lawful for such person so restrained of his or her liberty to apply to either of said justices or judges for a
writ of habeas corpus, which application shall be in writing and verified by affidavit, and shall set forth
the facts concerning the detention of the party applying, in whose custody he or she is detained, and by
virtue of what claim or authority, if known; and the said justice or judge to whom such application shall
be made shall forthwith award a writ of habeas corpus, unless it shall appear from the petition itself
that the party is not deprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the constitution or laws of the
United States, 14 Stat. 385-86 (1867). At the same time, Congress modified and codified much of the
procedure associated with the writ, including an appellate provision that was soon thereafter repealed,
15 Stat. 44 (1868); see Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869).
17 See e.g.: Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S.(18 Wall.) 163 (1874). Lange had been convicted of an offense

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 5
3 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a fine and a term of
imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that once Lange had paid the
fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his confinement was subject to the writ. Ex
parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold, although the statute in question was found to be within
the power of Congress, the Court held that had the prisoner been convicted under an unconstitutional
law he would have been entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to discharge on the writ
because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried, convicted and sentenced him to
fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed by the district attorney rather than upon a
grand jury indictment as required by the Fifth Amendment in the case of all capital and otherwise
infamous crimes. In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow was convicted of three counts of cohabitation
based on the same conduct during three different periods of time. The Court found that the misconduct
was one continuous offense rather than three offenses. Since three sentences would constitute multiple
punishment contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the trial court had acted beyond its jurisdiction and the
writ should issue.
QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Has the Petitioner Exhausted his Appeals in the State Courts?
ARUGUMENT NUMBER TWO: DISCRIMINATION AND CONTEMPT IN THE COMMONWEALTH
OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS.
The PETTITIONER alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987.

Just the

most recent activities of the PETITIONER are a clear indication of such. The activities surrounding the
PETITIONER'S life since June of 2015 immediately following the filing of an amicus curiae in the Lisa
Michelle Lambert Habeus Case of this same said court, No. 14-02559, in which the PETITIONER was
named MOVANT, has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while the PETITIONER
has made many in person complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the most recent to
the Manheim Township Substation in Lancaster Township regarding an assault at the Manor Shopping
Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015 9:00pm), the pleas for help and assistance have yielded
nothing but more attacks to the PETITIONER'S person, property, electronics, home, auto, reputation,
intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL
TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the
U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these same said actors and perpetrators.
The PETTITIONER has made many failed attempts to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987
to address these very same issues, specifically the Pennsylvania Securities Commission (Agent Howard
Eisler), the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office (Detective Bodan), the Civile Rights Enforcement

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 6
4 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Division of the Pennsylvania Attorney General (Investigator ....). The PETITIONER will argue that the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is unable to address these issues without prejudice, without
discrimination, and without corruption. This can be best described in the following Letter to the Editor
of the NEWSLANC organization of recent weeks:
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to 1987,
made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In 1987 I blew
the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was indicted for selling arms
and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA and the NSA. It was the 3rd
largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I was the victim of a widespread
wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that included 29 false arrests, multiple false
imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that to this day is still resonating.

Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on this
culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they so
emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that suggests they
are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The sad fact that it reaches
into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most outrageous and deplorable truth
to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle
Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge
Stewart Dalzell found her actually innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct
in the English speaking language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention
when then Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus cases. To
make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable Stewart Dalzell
from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9 months
while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable Judge
Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to life in
prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer Bill Curtis
did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free Lisa
Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT and
Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same type of
wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle Lambert fell

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 7
5 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed attorney
threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be successful in
helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege the U.S. District Judge was trying
in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to restore me to whole from a life
of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.

For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised some 90
million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of 5 domestic
companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client list that reached
across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies. And in 1987, myself
and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous recording studio, Power Station
Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first "digital movie". The intellectual property
rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal claims in federal courts were too much for the
"Good Old Boys" to handle....

In a December 30 editorial to the Washington Post

titled Pornographic email scandal roils

Pennsylvania politics regarding the jurisprudence in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania the following
was quoted by the editor of
"Anyone

who

neutrally

Newslanc.com;
looked

at

Pennsylvania

and

tried to

gauge the

quality of

jurisprudence in the state would have to laugh and say, What in the world is going on
there? . . . Our justice system is about as out of control as it can get. "EDITOR: These
matters cannot properly be settled within Pennsylvania. Everybody from the prosecutors, to
the attorney general, to the justices have skin in the game. It is time for these matters to be
given over to U. S. Attorney General so assure as close to a disinterested investigation as
circumstances permit."

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 8
6 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

RESUME AND BIOGRAPHY OF PETITIONER AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Present I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct
energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind
control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture
through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency
electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.

This assault was no coincidence in that it began

simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.

This assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J.

Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology
is that I am connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl
Crow of Kennett Missouri. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known
actors and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S.
intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S.
Attorney's Office refuse to comment

In 2009 Advanced Media Group Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL

to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster,

Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of
Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these
horrendous crimes for years.

The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed,

stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from
becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed
energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.

In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court of Appeals, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of
Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations included
violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to
several business interests, harassment, extortion, fraud, etc.,. . Central to this litigation is the Digital
Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated
businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of
International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of
selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. I was a shareholder of ISC,

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 9
7 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

and was solicited by ISC executives for professional services.


From 2002 to 2004 I engaged in full-time online day-trading of securities and the selling of
merchandise on eBay.
In 2000 to 2002 Advanced Media Group developed an array of marketing and communication tools
for wholesalers of the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several
of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica.
In 1999 Advanced Media Group was solicited and paid to develop a comprehensive business plan to
develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania by 2 Lancaster County restaurateurs. This plan was developed in conjunction with the
Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the
Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1998 I administered the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization promoting
education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding for the
Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline),
The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities. The video
"Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives,
and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness
to mental illness problems.
In 1996 Advanced Media Group had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time
that I was controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Advanced Media Group was retained by Gallo Rosso
Restaurant and Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I
had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container,
Inc., of Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the
Information Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million
Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been
using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the
merits of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout the entire organization.
Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars
per year.
In 1993 to 1998 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, in efforts to stave off a
potential bankruptcy. I was responsible for implementing computerized accounting, implementing

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page10
8 of
of111
190

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Management Information Systems, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource
policies and procedures, marketing strategies and programs, performance measurement reporting, and
administrative and office procedures and logistics. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in
profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and recorded record revenues.
In 1991 Advanced Media Group was elected to People to People International and the Citizen
Ambassador Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was
founded to To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and
effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face
scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F.
Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program.
We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing
technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 Advanced Media Group had worked on a project to develop voice recognition systems for the
governments technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology)

and the

Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA of the Department of Defense . I co-authored the
article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC,
then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that
technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of
applications involving telecommunications.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page11
9 of
of111
190

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

In 1989 I founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies
that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's, which at the time was a new and advanced
technology in its early stages of being commercialized from research and development.

We did

business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign
companies. I performed services and contracts or prepared proposals for a host of domestic and foreign
companies including but not limited to: for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of
Standards & Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft,
AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, the Library of Congress, Exxon, Tandy
Computers/Radio Shack, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems,
which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now Map Quest. Map Quest is
the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in
delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell
American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly & Sons of Chicago, Illinois.
American Helix was later sold to KAO Industries.

We were also the exclusive marketing agent and

partner with a Boston, Massachusetts software engineer in the selling of a software developed to
diagnose and test CD-ROM drives called CD-Diagnostics. The program was sold to both domestic and
foreign companies and was then under review for company-wide distribution by Microsoft Corporation.

In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York retained my services as executive producer of a motion
picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of its
kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the Power
Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the
DOLBY technology trademark. We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for
the development and commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to
the recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios
was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was
15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were
responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce
Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and
many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original
Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track
recording of its time. Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace
technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in
delivering the Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 12


10 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

the commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS
trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound
systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the
mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 13


11 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million
dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from
developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital
that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through
private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion
Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking
to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde
Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National
Bank. We were quickly seeking commitments for real estate
deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local developers seeking
our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of
The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets), and Drew Anthon of Eden Resort Inn. We were
constantly told that our financing packages were more completive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG) and served as Executive Vice President
and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd., the investment advisory subsidiary.

FMG was a large financial

services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had


developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in
the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors,
liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate
headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in
Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under
management, and our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions per year, which did
not include the fees from the other professionals. We had acquired an interest in our own Broker Dealer
firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million in 1987.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the

teams scouting

departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant
on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of
video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting
departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the
Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL., and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the
leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 14


12 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League
Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my
camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page
article about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60
participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster
Catholic, with a professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and
produced the video. The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of
the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him
and

said

he

looked

forward

to

reviewing

the

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 15


13 of 190
111

tapes

for

any

hopeful

recruits.

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
From 1982 to 1985 I was a financial planner for IDS/American Express and licensed in both securities
and insurances.
From 1977 to 1981 I operated SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating and was was a contractor
responsible for painting and renovating residential, commercial and residential properties and facilities
in Lancaster County.

Dated August 8, 2016

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 16


14 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain and changing relations among newly liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments
of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on
the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned why my work was
used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited with my work .

The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-thelight

The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.

KAREN STEWART'S TRANSCRIPT


First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a righteous lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as paranoid and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an investigation by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 17


15 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.

I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my familys hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photostalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriffs Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a secret exercise, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, InfraGard, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a cast-iron target, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and
monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate
car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 18


16 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site the big bad threat to report my
location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to
someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual See, shes paranoid, reporting harassment every day now just dismiss her lawsuit!
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly nave,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched gang-stalking and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
electrical harassment was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I cant say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 19


17 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriffs Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime before I or
one of my family is dead. They cant quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the Silent Warriors because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. Im sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and
may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their secret exercise in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply settling for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with itincluding any leader or
politician.

Date: August 8, 2016


___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street


Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court
of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for
Kathleen Kane

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 20


18 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case
No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-0603401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 21


19 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 22


20 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

October 2015
OFFICE OF THE CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20543

GUIDE FOR PROSPECTIVE INDIGENT PETITIONERS FOR WRITS OF

CERTIORARI

I. Introduction
These instructions and forms are designed to assist petitioners who are proceeding in
forma pauperis and without the assistance of counsel. A copy of the Rules of the
Supreme Court, which establish the procedures that must be followed, is also enclosed.
Be sure to read the following Rules carefully:
Rules 10-14 (Petitioning for certiorari)

Rule 29 (Filing and service on opposing party or counsel)

Rule 30 (Computation and extension of time)

Rules 33.2 and 34 (Preparing pleadings on 812 x 11 inch paper)

Rule 39 (Proceedings in forma pauperis)

II. Nature of Supreme Court Review


It is important to note that review in this Court by means of a writ of certiorari is not
a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. The primary concern of the Supreme
Court is not to correct errors in lower court decisions, but to decide cases presenting
issues of importance beyond the particular facts and parties involved. The Court
grants and hears argument in only about 1% of the cases that are led each Term.
The vast majority of petitions are simply denied by the Court without comment or
explanation. The denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari signies only that the
Court has chosen not to accept the case for review and does not express the Courts
view of the merits of the case.
Every petitioner for a writ of certiorari is advised to read carefully the Considerations
Governing Review on Certiorari set forth in Rule 10. Important considerations for
accepting a case for review include the existence of a conict between the decision of
which review is sought and a decision of another appellate court on the same issue.
An important function of the Supreme Court is to resolve disagreements among lower
courts about specic legal questions. Another consideration is the importance to the
public of the issue.
III. The Time for Filing
You must le your petition for a writ of certiorari within 90 days from the date of the
entry of the nal judgment in the United States court of appeals or highest state
appellate court or 90 days from the denial of a timely led petition for rehearing. The
issuance of a mandate or remittitur after judgment has been entered has no bearing
on the computation of time and does not extend the time for ling. See Rules 13.1 and

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 23


21 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

13.3. Filing in the Supreme Court means the actual receipt of documents by the Clerk;
or their deposit in the United States mail, with rst-class postage prepaid, on or before
the nal date allowed for ling; or their delivery to a third-party commercial carrier,
on or before the nal date allowed for ling, for delivery to the Clerk within 3 calendar
days. See Rule 29.2.
IV. What To File
Unless you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel,
le:
An original and ten copies of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
an original and 10 copies of an afdavit or declaration in support thereof. See Rule 39.
An original and 10 copies of a petition for a writ of certiorari with an appendix
consisting of a copy of the judgment or decree you are asking this Court to review
including any order on rehearing, and copies of any opinions or orders by any courts or
administrative agencies that have previously considered your case. See Rule 14.1(i).
One afdavit or declaration showing that all opposing parties or their counsel have
been served with a copy of the papers led in this Court. See Rule 29.
If you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel, you need
le only the original of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, afdavit or
declaration when needed in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pau
peris, the petition for a writ of certiorari, and proof of service.
If the court below appointed counsel in the current proceeding, no afdavit or declara
tion is required, but the motion should cite the provision of law under which counsel
was appointed, or a copy of the order of appointment should be appended to the motion.
See Rule 39.1.
The attached forms may be used for the original motion, afdavit or declaration, and
petition, and should be stapled together in that order. The proof of service should be
included as a detached sheet, and the form provided may be used.
V. Page Limitation
The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 40 pages excluding the pages that
precede Page 1 of the form. The documents required to be contained in the appendix
to the petition do not count toward the page limit. See Rule 33.2(b).

VI. Method of Filing


All documents to be led in this Court must be addressed to the Clerk, Supreme Court
of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543 and must be served on opposing parties
or their counsel in accordance with Rule 29.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 24


22 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORMS

I.

Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - Rule 39


A. On the form provided for the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
leave the case number blank. The number will be assigned by the Clerk when
the case is docketed.
B. On the line in the case caption for petitioner, type your name. As a pro
se petitioner, you may represent only yourself. On the line for respondent,
type the name of the opposing party in the lower court. If there are multiple
respondents, enter the rst respondent, as the name appeared on the lower court
decision, followed by et al. to indicate that there are other respondents. The
additional parties must be listed in the LIST OF PARTIES section of the
petition.
C. If the lower courts in your case granted you leave to proceed in forma pau
peris, check the appropriate space and indicate the court or courts that allowed
you to proceed in forma pauperis. If none of the lower courts granted you
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, check the block that so indicates.
D. Sign the motion on the signature line.

II. Afdavit or Declaration in Support of Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma


Pauperis
On the form provided, answer fully each of the questions. If the answer to a question
is 0, none, or not applicable (N/A), enter that response. If you need more space
to answer a question or to explain your answer, attach a separate sheet of paper,
identied with your name and the question number. Unless each question is fully
answered, the Clerk will not accept the petition. The form must either be notarized
or be in the form of a declaration. See 28 U. S. C. 1746.
III. Cover Page - Rule 34
When you complete the form for the cover page:
A. Leave case number blank. The number will be assigned by the Clerk when
the case is docketed.
B. Complete the case caption as you did on the motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis.
C. List the court from which the action is brought on the line following the
words on petition for a writ of certiorari to. If your case is from a state court,
enter the name of the court that last addressed the merits of the case. For
example, if the highest state court denied discretionary review, and the state
court of appeals afrmed the decision of the trial court, the state court of
appeals should be listed. If your case is federal, the United States court of

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 25


23 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

appeals that decided your case will always be listed here.


D. Enter your name, address, and telephone number in the appropriate spaces.
IV. Question(s) Presented
On the page provided, enter the question or questions that you wish the Court to
review. The questions must be concise. Questions presented in cases accepted for
review are usually no longer than two or three sentences. The purpose of the question
presented is to assist the Court in selecting cases. State the issue you wish the Court
to decide clearly and without unnecessary detail.
V. List of Parties
On the page provided, check either the box indicating that the names of all parties
appear in the caption of the case on the cover page or the box indicating that there are
additional parties. If there are additional parties, list them. Rule 12.6 states that all
parties to the proceeding whose judgment is sought to be reviewed shall be deemed
parties in this Court, and that all parties other than petitioner shall be respondents.
The court whose judgment you seek to have this Court review is not a party.
VI. Table of Contents
On the page provided, list the page numbers on which the required portions of the
petition appear. Number the pages consecutively, beginning with the Opinions
Below page as page 1.
VII. Index of Appendices
List the description of each document that is included in the appendix beside the appro
priate appendix letter. Mark the bottom of the rst page of each appendix with the
appropriate designation, e.g., Appendix A. See Rule 14.1 pertaining to the items to
be included in the appendix.
A. Federal Courts
If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a federal court, the decision
of the United States court of appeals should be designated Appendix A.
Appendix A should be followed by the decision of the United States District
Court and the ndings and recommendations of the United States magistrate
judge, if there were any. If the United States court of appeals denied a timely
led petition for rehearing, a copy of that order should be appended next. If
you are seeking review of a decision in a habeas corpus case, and the decision of
either the United States District Court or the United States Court of Appeals
makes reference to a state court decision in which you were a party, a copy of
the state court decision must be included in the appendix.
B. State Courts
If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a state court, the decision of
which review is sought should be designated Appendix A. Appendix A should
be followed by the decision of the lower court or agency that was reviewed in
the decision designated Appendix A. If the highest court of the state in which a

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 26


24 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

decision could be had denied discretionary review, a copy of that order should
follow. If an order denying a timely led petition for rehearing starts the run
ning of the time for ling a petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 13.3,
a copy of the order should be appended next.
As an example, if the state trial court ruled against you, the intermediate court
of appeals afrmed the decision of the trial court, the state supreme court denied
discretionary review and then denied a timely petition for rehearing, the appen
dices should appear in the following order:
Appendix A Decision of State Court of Appeals
Appendix B Decision of State Trial Court
Appendix C Decision of State Supreme Court Denying Review
Appendix D Order of State Supreme Court Denying Rehearing

VIII. Table of Authorities


On the page provided, list the cases, statutes, treatises, and articles that you reference
in your petition, and the page number of your petition where each authority appears.
IX. Opinions Below
In the space provided, indicate whether the opinions of the lower courts in your case
have been published, and if so, the citation for the opinion below. For example, opin
ions of the United States courts of appeals are published in the Federal Reporter. If
the opinion in your case appears at page 100 of volume 30 of the Federal Reporter,
Third Series, indicate that the opinion is reported at 30 F. 3d 100. If the opinion has
been designated for publication but has not yet been published, check the appropriate
space. Also indicate where in the appendix each decision, reported or unreported,
appears.
X. Jurisdiction
The purpose of the jurisdiction section of the petition is to establish the statutory
source for the Courts jurisdiction and the dates that determine whether the petition
is timely led. The form sets out the pertinent statutes for federal and state cases.
You need provide only the dates of the lower court decisions that establish the timeli
ness of the petition for a writ of certiorari. If an extension of time within which to
le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted, you must provide the requested
information pertaining to the extension. If you seek to have the Court review a deci
sion of a state court, you must provide the date the highest state court decided your
case, either by ruling on the merits or denying discretionary review.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 27


25 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

XI. Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved


Set out verbatim the constitutional provisions, treaties, statutes, ordinances and regu
lations involved in the case. If the provisions involved are lengthy, provide their cita
tion and indicate where in the Appendix to the petition the text of the provisions
appears.
XII. Statement of the Case
Provide a concise statement of the case containing the facts material to the consider
ation of the question(s) presented; you should summarize the relevant facts of the case
and the proceedings that took place in the lower courts. You may need to attach
additional pages, but the statement should be concise and limited to the relevant facts
of the case.
XIII. Reasons for Granting the Petition
The purpose of this section of the petition is to explain to the Court why it should
grant certiorari. It is important to read Rule 10 and address what compelling reasons
exist for the exercise of the Courts discretionary jurisdiction. Try to show not only
why the decision of the lower court may be erroneous, but the national importance of
having the Supreme Court decide the question involved. It is important to show
whether the decision of the court that decided your case is in conict with the decisions
of another appellate court; the importance of the case not only to you but to others
similarly situated; and the ways the decision of the lower court in your case was errone
ous. You will need to attach additional pages, but the reasons should be as concise as
possible, consistent with the purpose of this section of the petition.
XIV. Conclusion
Enter your name and the date that you submit the petition.
XV. Proof of Service
You must serve a copy of your petition on counsel for respondent(s) as required by
Rule 29. If you serve the petition by rst-class mail or by third-party commercial
carrier, you may use the enclosed proof of service form. If the United States or any
department, ofce, agency, ofcer, or employee thereof is a party, you must serve the
Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsyl
vania Ave., N.W., Washington, D. C. 205300001. The lower courts that ruled on your
case are not parties and need not be served with a copy of the petition. The proof of
service may be in the form of a declaration pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 1746.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 28


26 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

No.

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Stanley J. Caterbone

PETITIONER

(Your Name)
VS.
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention, et.al.,

RESPONDENT(S)

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


The petitioner asks leave to le the attached petition for a writ of certiorari
without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.
Please check the appropriate boxes:
x Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in
D
the following court(s):
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeal; U.S. District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania; Supreme Court of Pennsylvania;

Superior Court of Pennsylvania; U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District; Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas; Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

D Petitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma


pauperis in any other court.
D
x Petitioners afdavit or declaration in support of this motion is attached hereto.
D Petitioners afdavit or declaration is not attached because the court below
appointed counsel in the current proceeding, and:
D The appointment was made under the following provision of law:
, or
D a copy of the order of appointment is appended.

(Signature)

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 29


27 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
I, Stanley J. Caterbone
, am the petitioner in the above-entitled case. In support of
my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of my poverty I am unable to pay
the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and I believe I am entitled to redress.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of
the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use gross
amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.
Income source

Average monthly amount during


the past 12 months

Amount expected
next month

You

Spouse

You

Spouse

Employment

Self-employment

Income from real property


(such as rental income)

Interest and dividends

Gifts

Alimony

Child Support

Retirement (such as social


security, pensions,
annuities, insurance)

Disability (such as social


$
security, insurance payments)

$1,357.00

Unemployment payments

Public-assistance
(such as welfare)

Other (specify):

$ $1,357.00

Total monthly income:

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 30


28 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent rst. (Gross monthly pay
is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer

Address

Dates of
Employment

Gross monthly pay

None, Pro Se Litigant

$
$
$

3. List your spouses employment history for the past two years, most recent employer rst.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer

Address

Dates of
Employment

Gross monthly pay


$
$
$

4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $ 25,000.00


Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other nancial
institution.
Financial institution

Type of account

Members First
TD Ameritrade

Checking/Savings
Checking

Amount you have


$ 9,950.00
$ 15,000.00
$

Amount your spouse has


$
$
$

5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
x Home
D
Value 25% of 80,000.00

D Other real estate


Value

x Motor Vehicle #1
D
Year, make & model 2007 Honda CRV
Value $4,000.00

D Motor Vehicle #2
Year, make & model
Value

x Other assets
D
Description 997,000,000 Shares of Advanced Media Group, Ltd., - NON MARKETABLE STOCK
Value

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 31


29 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
Person owing you or
your spouse money

Amount owed to you

See Attached Accts Recievables

Amount owed to your spouse

4,295,443.24

7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name
Attilio and Angelen Grossi

Relationship

Age

Extended Family

90/89

8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the amounts
paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly, quarterly, or
annually to show the monthly rate.
You

Your spouse

$ 350.00

Utilities (electricity, heating fuel,


water, sewer, and telephone)

$ 510.00

Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep)

300.00

Food

200.00

Clothing

50.00

Laundry and dry-cleaning

Medical and dental expenses

Rent or home-mortgage payment


(include lot rented for mobile home)
Are real estate taxes included? D
x Yes D No
Is property insurance included? D
x Yes D No
No Mortgage

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 32


30 of 190
111

$
100.00

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

You
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments)

Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc.

100.00
200.00

Your spouse
$
$

Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)


48.00

Homeowners or renters

Life

Health

Motor Vehicle

70.00

200.00

Other:

Office/Computer/Copying/Postage

Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)


$

(specify):

Installment payments
220.00

Motor Vehicle

Credit card(s)

Department store(s)

Other:

Home Improvement

500.00

Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others

Regular expenses for operation of business, profession,

or farm (attach detailed statement)

Other (specify):

Total monthly expenses:

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 33


31 of 190
111

2,278.00

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or
liabilities during the next 12 months?
x Yes
D

D No

If yes, describe on an attached sheet.

10. Have you paid or will you be paying an attorney any money for services in connection
x No
with this case, including the completion of this form?
D Yes
D
If yes, how much?

If yes, state the attorneys name, address, and telephone number:

11. Have you paidor will you be payinganyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal or
a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this
form?
D Yes

x No
D

If yes, how much?


If yes, state the persons name, address, and telephone number:

12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the costs of this case.
This Alleged "conspiracy" for lack of a better term, has been extorting real assets, real monies, real businesses,
real property, and real intellectual property since 1987. It is designed to drain even additional assets through
the use of judicial misconduct; public corruption; and the obstruction of justice and due process by making
me pay to have the courts of this country put an end to this once and for all - the charging of court fees
is in itself another means of extorting real monies from A VICTIM!

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on:

August 9,

, 20 16

(Signature)

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 34


32 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

No.

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Stanley J. Caterbone

PETITIONER

(Your Name)

vs.

Lancaster County Crisis Intervention, et.al.,

RESPONDENT(S)

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

U.S.C.A. Third Circuit

(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE)

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Stanley J. Caterbone

(Your Name)
1250 Fremont Street

(Address)
Lancaster, PA 17603

(City, State, Zip Code)


(717) 669-2163

(Phone Number)

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 35


33 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED

1. Has the lower courts obstructed my rights to due process and have they recinded my U.S. Constitutional Rights
2. As an "Enemy of the State", Targeted Individual, and Victim of U.S. Mind Control (SSA has granted me disability
benefits in August of 2009 for Symptoms and Illnesses Relating to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control) Will You Grant Me
My LIBERTY AND FREEDOM - As Guarunteed To All U.S. Citizens? I have Amended the Habeus Corpus of the
U.S. District Court in December of 2015 which specifically requests the same; only to be DENIED by the U.S.
Third Circuit. The Amended Habeus is attached and is from Case No. 15-03984 of the U.S. District Court.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 36


34 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

LIST OF PARTIES

[ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
[ x] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of
all parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this
petition is as follows:
Lancaster County District Attorney
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police
Lancaster City Police Department
Dr. Silvia Gratz, Medical Director Fairmount Behavioral Health
Fairmount Behavioral Health System
Lancaster General Hospital
Nurse Jane Doe

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 37


35 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OPINIONS BELOW ........................................................................................................ 1

JURISDICTION...................................................................................................................

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED .................................

STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................................................................

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT ..........................................................................

CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................

INDEX TO APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX F

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 38


36 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED

CASES

PAGE NUMBER

STATUTES AND RULES

OTHER

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 39


37 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.

OPINIONS BELOW
[ ] For cases from federal courts:
The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix
the petition and is

to

[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix
the petition and is

to

[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
[ ] For cases from state courts:
The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at
Appendix
to the petition and is
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the
appears at Appendix

court
to the petition and is

[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.

1.

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 40


38 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

JURISDICTION

[ ] For cases from federal courts:


The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case
was
.
[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely led in my case.
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of
Appeals on the following date:
, and a copy of the
order denying rehearing appears at Appendix
.
[ ] An extension of time to le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date)
in Application No.
A
.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. 1254(1).

[ ] For cases from state courts:


The date on which the highest state court decided my case was
A copy of that decision appears at Appendix
.

[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:
, and a copy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
.
[ ] An extension of time to le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date) in
Application No.
A
.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. 1257(a).

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 41


39 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 42


40 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 43


41 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 44


42 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

CONCLUSION

The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

Date:

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 45


43 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

No.

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITIONER
(Your Name)
VS.
RESPONDENT(S)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I,

, do swear or declare that on this date,


, 20
, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 I have
served the enclosed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
and PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI on each party to the above proceeding
or that partys counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing
an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed
to each of them and with rst-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party
commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days.
The names and addresses of those served are as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on

, 20

(Signature)

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 46


44 of 190
111

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 47 of 190

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case


No.

A
c
t
i
v
e

Case No.

Court
Case Description

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)

Court Venue

Filing
Date

Appeal
Date

Defendants

Judges

Judement
Value

Notes

United States Federal Courts


CA 06-1538

Fulton Bank Auto Stay

Fed Court of Appeals

3/3/2006

Fulton Bank

Judge Anita Brody

Appeal from . Eastern Dist. Bankruptcy Court


Fulton Stay

Judge TwardowskiJudge Fehling

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition, Dismissed


June 13,2005 Reinstated Oct 27, 2005 Judge
Brody

They want to discharge or convert


to Chapter 7

Filed on 05/16/05 after abby & Lanc Dist Atty


meeting; Judge McLaughlin found at least 15
causes of actions without my amended appeal;
must only cure statute of limitations
Est $50 to $350
deficiencies; RICO and National Security Issues Million

Need to Amend and talk to Tony, As


soon as PP&L turns electric back on
and get back in Office with Drivers
License**

No. 05-23059

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Description

U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition

5/23/2005

Filed May 23, 2005

Lost appeal

05-cv-2288

Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present

US Dist Court Eastern District

5/16/2005

Judge Mary McLaughlin- Stuart A.


Weiss, Esquire
George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire
Fulton Bank; Mellon Bank; Cozen O'Connor-Howard L. Kelin,
Esquire
Stone Harbor Police;
Kegel, Kelin, Almy & GrimmLancaster County
George T. Brubaker, Esquire
Sheriffs; Avalon Police;
Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, LLCLancaster County Prison; Stephanie Carfley, Esquire
Manheim Township
Robert W. Hallinger
Appel & Yost LLP
Police/

CA-05-3689

Chapter 11 Dismissal

U.S. District Ct of Appeals

6/13/2005

US Dept of Justice Trusee Judge Anita Brody

Order Reversed of Judge Twardowski

Awarded Appeal

CA 06-5117

Appealed Order to have Brief due by Sept 06


by Judge Fehling
U.S. District Ct of Appeals

8/23/2006

Judge Anita Brody

Appeal Chapter 11 Brief Due by Sept 6

See **

Judge Anita Brody


Judge Mary McLaughlin

Appeal PP&L Order Only owe about $700.00

Wenger, et al
ISC/Ferranti/US Attorney
General Gonzales

Judge Mary McLaughlin

6
7

8
9
9

Y
Y

10
11
12

06-cv-4154
06-CV-4650

06-cv-4734
06-cv-5138
Case No.

Appeal Hearing for PP&L did not get notice


until day of Hearing
RICO Complaint

U.S. District Ct of Appeals


U.S. District Ct of Appeals

U.S. Attorney General then U.S.


District Court for the Eastern
District
US Dist Court Eastern District
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Court Venue

Federal False Caims Act - ISC


Whistleblowing
Habeas Corpus Lanc County Prison

07-cv-2151

Appeal Order to 06-5012 CH 11 Dismissal by


US DOJ Trustee
Third Circuit Court of Appeals

06-cv-3955
06-cv-3054

Appeal Order to Amend Complaint by Sept


15 2006 05-2288
Appeal Brody PP&L

Third Circuit Court of Appeals


Third Circuit Court of Appeals

8/25/2006
10/25/2006

10/1/2006
11/20/2006
Date
4/13/2007

07-cv-4474

Appeal McLaughlin 05-2288 Oct 24 Dismissal Third Circuit Court of Appeals

11/23/2007

14
12

07-cv-4475

Appeal McLaughlin 06-4650 Oct 24 Dismissal Third Circuit Court of Appeals

11/23/2007
Date

PA Court of Common Pleas


S Caterbone AMG PH v. D Anthon Eden
Resort

Court Venue

Defendants

Judges

US Dept of Justice Trusee

8/25/2006

13

Case No.

Date

15% to 25% of Assets recovered in 1991 with


accumulated interest; estimated $300 Million
reclaimed
Description

Appeal Judge McLaughlin Due by Sept 6

See **

Lanc Co, Fulton, et al

Date

Wenger, et al
Defendants

Judges

Description

4/26/2005
8/2/2006

Drew Anthon, East of Eden Non Assigned


Mike Caterbone
Non Assigned

Defaulted; filed for claim; McNeese atty


Libel,slander, email; medicine for money

CI-06-03403

S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell

PA Common Pleas

4/11/2006

Thomas Grassel

Non Assigned

Sexual Harassment filed from last June 2005

CI-06-03401

S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police

PA Common Pleas

4/11/2006

SRPD;Fiorill,Busser,Fedor

Judge Madenspacher reasgined it All physical abuse, abuse of power, theft


to Judge Georgelis so he said
of$750 cash on Apr 5, 302 document, hospital

PA Common Pleas

4/10/2006

Lancaster General
HospitalDr. Emily Preston

Non Assigned

CI-05-03644
CI-06-07376

17

18

19

CI-06-03349

S Caterbone v. Lancaster General


Hospital

20

CI-06-07330

S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville

PA Common Pleas

8/1/2006

Harleysville Insurance

Non Assigned

Illegal 5 day hospitalization Apr 5 to 10th


Charged $9889.00 by LGH; Fabricated 302
document;Officer Fedor/Busser
Non Payment of Insurance Claims due
$7500.00 for damaged and stolen items

21

CI-O6-04939

PA Common Pleas

5/24/2006

Dave, Mike, Brett, AlleyKat

Non Assigned

Libel,slander, IFP Denied/Note Recorded

22

CI-06-02271

S Cat AMG v Pflumm,Stabley,Mike


Fulton Bank v. S Caterbone
Foreclosure

PA Common Pleas

3/8/2006

Stanley J. Caterbone

Non Assigned

Fulton Mortgage Foreclosure

23

CI-06-07188

S Caterbone AMG v. PPL Electric

PA Common Pleas

7/26/2006

PP&L Electric

Non Assigned

Illegal Service Interuption, Business damage

24

CI-06-06658

S Caterbone AMG v. PennDOT

PA Common Pleas

7/14/2006

PennDOT Drivers License

Non Assigned

Appeal Drivers License Suspension

Illegal Drivers License


Siezure

Non Assigned

Drivers License Under Appeal, no authority,


pulled me over in Lancaster City Jurisdiction
took Honda to Towing Yard St. Dennis in
Mountville $25 per day

25

CI-06-08490

26
27

Y
Y

CV-0000207-05

28

Cv-160-06

29

CI-07-00019

S Caterbone AMG v. M. Schaefer


Millersvill Boro Police Dept
District Justice
1250 Renovations Payment
S Cat AMG v Comcast
Emergency Petition Set Aside Stone
Hill Road Sheriff Sale

PA Common Pleas

9/2/2006

District Court 02-1-01

Y. Caterbone

DJ Sheryl Hartman

DJ Sheryl Hartman 07/11/05 Hearing

District Court 02-1-01

6/27/2006

Comcast;Susan Gibson

MDJ Ballentine

Chapter 11 Illegal Interuption of Service

PA Common Pleas

1/2/2007

Addendum 01/05/2007

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Notes
See **

PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas

Y
Y

Value

Appeal Judge McLaughlin Due by Sept 6

S Caterbone v. Mike Caterbone

15
16

Est $45 Million plus


5% Annual Interest
from 1992

Page 48 of 190
1 of 4

Value

Notes

26.000.00
$10,000 +

Must Collect
Defaulted

$100,000.00 Defaulted

$300,000.00

$1,000,000.00 Defualted, May move to Federal


$7900 plus damages Defualted
Never Recorde by Prothonetary
$97,000.00 Appeal Superior Ct
$5,000.00 Remove to Ch 11
Appeal Superior Ct

$50,000.00
$4,958.00 Won and Collected
Awaiting Verdict from July 20th,
$5,000.00 2006

Tuesday August 9, 2016


12/22/2007

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case


30

A
c
t
Y

CI-07-00150

31

32
29

No.

Case No.

Court
Case Description

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)

Court Venue

Filing
Date

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Appeal
Date

Defendants

Judges

Description

Judement
Value

Notes

Date

Defendants

Judges

Description

Value

Notes

PA Common Pleas

1/8/2007

CI-07-00366

Emergency Petition Food Stamps


Emergency Injuncion
Obstruction,Fraud,Embezzlement

PA Common Pleas

1/16/2007

CI-07-03924
Case No.

Caterbone v Lombardo & Office Max


PA Superior Court

PA Common Pleas
Court Venue

5/7/2007
Date

33

1463 MDA 2006

Fulton Bank v. S. Caterbone

CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court

8/30/2006

Fulton Bank

Judge Georgelis

34

1462 MDA 2006

S Caterbone v. PennDOT

CI-06-06658 PA Superior Court

8/30/2006

PennDOT

Judge Cullen to Judge Georgelis? Appeal Drivers License Suspen Georgelis

1461 MDA 2006


855 MDA 2007

S. Caterbone v. S Regional Police


Comm of PA v Caterbone Fiorill
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 May 11
Judement
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 Feb 24
Reconsider IFP Frivelous
Comm of PA v Caterbone East
Lampeter Judge Farina
Comm of PA v Caterbone Dauphin
County Harrisburg Airport Ticket
Caterbone v. Lancaster General
Hospital/Dr. Emily Pressley

CI-06-03401 PA Superior Court


SA-0160-06 PA Superior Court

8/30/2006
5/7/2007

S Regional Police Dept


Officer Fiorill

Judge Allison
Judge Reinaker

06-00366 PA Superior Court

6/1/2006

Totaro, Farina, Cullen,etal

Judge Cullen

1/4/2007

Bezzard, East Lampeter

Judge Farina

3/9/2007

MDJ Smith, Dauphin Cty

35
36

951 MDA 2007

37

950 MDA 2007

38
39

125 MDA 2007

1565 MDA 2007

435 MDA 2007

40
41

42
43

44
45

Y
Y

1097 MDA 2007


1103 MDA 2007
2052 MDA 2007
2053 MDA 2007

06-00366 PA Superior Court


CP-36-CR-0002843-06
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
CI-06-03349

8/30/2007

Whiteford
Gjurich

Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA 1463 CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court

2/5/2007

Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA 1463 CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court

7/20/2007

48

432 MT 2007

Superior Court Appeal 950 MDA 2007

CI-07-00366

8/16/2007

49

433 MT 2007

Superior Court Appeal 950 MDA 2007

8/16/2007

50

418 MT 2007

Superior Court Appeal 435 MDA 2007

51

128 MM 2007

Superior Court Appeal 435 MDA 2007


Commonwealth Court

CI-07-00366
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court

Georgelis
Georgelis

8/8/2007
8/8/2007

53

Y
Y

1130 CD 2007
1444 CD 2007

Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003


Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003

April 26, 2007 ORDER Rosen


July 5 2007 ORDER Cooksey

8/2/2007

Docket/Brief Schedule
Docket/Brief Schedule

54

1442 CD 2007

Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-004A

July 10, 2007 ORDER Rosen

8/2/2007

Docket/Brief Schedule

Case No.

45

Criminal District Justice - 27


Overturned

Court Venue

Appeal Amend Due by August 20 2006

Judge Cullen

4771-2006 Did not file brief due to


charges were dismissed on Nov 1
DUI Motion to Rescind Bail Supervision 2007
Penn DOT
S-154-2007 Ballentine Insurance
S-154-2007
S-158-2007 Simms Disorderly
S-158-2007
Pennsylvania Supreme Court

248 MDA 2007


248 MDA
Reconsideration

42
52

Date

Date

Defendants

Judges

Description

District Court 02-2-6


District Court 02-1-01

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone

TR-0000245-06

Harrasment; Letter about cat


Buser File Fleeing Arresting Officer
Southern Regional Speeding &
InspectionHearing Jun 9th 9:00 am

District Court 02-1-01

7/7/2006 Stan Caterbone

TR-0003020-06

Reading Parking Meter & Inspection

District Court 02-1-01

Stan Caterbone

Judge Thomas Xavios

Tim Deacon 236 Stone Hill Road, My Cat


Killed,Appeal due on 06/10/05 paid fine/Judicial
Complaint to file /Southern Regional file
harrassment
Filed Fleeing charges on April 10, 2006
Change of Venue to Quarryville DJ by Judge
Eckert
April 25th; 10:00 am 1259 North 10th Street,
Reading,PA 19604/610-373-4424

59

TR-0000085-06

Southern Regional 2 Girls Walking


asked time when burglar in 220 Stone
Hill Went to Store for help

District Court 02-1-01

Stan Caterbone

Judge QuarryvilleJudge Eckert

2 Girls Walking fabricated harassment


chargesApril 2, 2006

60

SP2421099

Vineland, NJ 856-691-4111 39:4-97

District Court 02-1-01

Stan Caterbone

TR-0001010-06

Firorill Careless Driving

District Court 02-2-6

Stan Caterbone

55
56

57
58

61

CV-0000207-05
District Justice

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

No Opinion

Judge Cullen

47

46

Fulton Mortgage Dec Judge Georgelis

4/3/2006

MDJ Eckert
MDJ Eckert to Hamilton
MDJ Eckert to Mylin

Was never in Vineland, New Jersey


MDJ Eckert to Hamilton

Page 49 of 190
2 of 4

Value

Notes

Must File Appeal, Never received


Notice for Appeal Hearing Sept
$381.00 2005Cat killed, I'm charged

$187.50 Appeal No. SA159-2006


$62.50

$247.50 Must file Appeal - All lies; burglary


Driving Violation, was never stopped
or saw any police
A complete lie, Fiorill perjury, off
$287.50 duty

Tuesday August 9, 2016


12/22/2007

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case


No.
62

63
64

A
c
t
Y

65

66

67

Case No.
TR-0001011-06

71
72

Court Venue

Filing
Date

District Court 02-2-6

MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Eckert to Commins

CR-0000141-06

DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons

District Court 02-3-03

8/8/2006

Stan Caterbone

MDJ Hamilton to Commins

See Notes; Fabricated charges by SRPD

Disorderly Conduct
Parking Meter Violation

District Court 02-2-02

4/12/2006

Stan Caterbone

MDJ Ballentine

Cable/Internet Past Due-See Illegal Interuption

District Court 02-2-02


District Court 02-2-04

7/7/2006
5/26/2006

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone

MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Simms

LCPD Whiteford Lied; did not


Parking Meter

$81.89 verdict on June 28 2006

Picking Up Sheryl; No ticket on van; lied


Parking Meter

Picking up Sheryl at Harrisburg


International, grounded plane,
Lance;Clinton; Wendell married on
$67.50 Sat night
$62.00

5/19/2006
6/16/2006
10/16/2006
10/25/2006
timeserved

Parking Meter
Parking Meter

MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas


MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas

Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
No Parking or Stoping

82
83
84
85
86

TR-0004428-06
TR-0003557-06
TR-0000598-06
TR-0002645-06
TR-0002646-06

MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas


MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas-MDJ Roth
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford

Parking Meter Oct 5 Sentence


Parking Meter
Rubbish-Littering Oct 10 sentence
Careless Driving-Aug 15 Sentence
Stop Sign

5/26/2006
4/28/2006

87
88
89

TR-0007528-06
TR-2183-2006
TR-2184-2006

MDJ Simms/Wilcox-Bourne Witness


MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus

Driving Under Suspension Aug 30


Driving Under Suspension Aug 30
Driving w/out Insurance

9/13/2006
9/5/2006
9/5/2006

Case No.

Case No.
MD 51-2007

Got mad when he was wrong about


IFP law, Right before Littering
Hearing, Lanc Cop would have been
made fool of
$81.89 S

Careless Driving; Stop Sign Violation


Meter Violation

District Court 12-2-01


District Court 12-1-03

2006-214
2006-215
2006-220
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 2007-

.073 w/ mouth wash/I turned then


they put lights on, wood hatchet in
van

Comcast v. S Caterbone

HIA Parking Violation


Parking Meter Violation

PA Judicial Conduct Review Board

Court Venue

(MDJ William G. Reuter)


Dismissed
MDJ B. Denise Commins)
Dismissed
(MDJ Lm H. Eckert, Jr.)
(MDJ Stuart J. Mylh)
(MDJ Maynard A. Hamilton, Jr.)
(Judge David Reineker)
Geogelis August
Eckert
Dismissed June 2006
Farina,Reinaker,Cullins,Eckert,Commins
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
of Pennsylvania
Court Venue
Change Venue/Continuance Simms Jan23

MDJ Simms
MDJ Simms

He was on bike, never went through


stop sign, he was the one at the
$381.50 Police Station that did illusion trick
Fabricated

8/11/2006
5/26/2006

TR-0001517
TR-0005057

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone

Notes

District Court 02-2-04


District Court 02-2-04

MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas


MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas

89

MDJ Eckert to Hamilton

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone

CR-0000385-06
TR-0004428-06

Judement
Value

A complete lie, took picture, he had


$75.00 matress on top of car

7/11/2006
4/3/2006

TR-0008503-06
TR-0008735-06

99

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Description

District Court 02-2-6


District Court 02-2-6

TR-0006812-06
TR-0008037-06
TR-0008066-06
TR-0007880-06
TR-0008721-06
TR-0008578-06
TR-0003557-06

Judges

Whiteford Insurance Card


Terroristic Threat Evacuate Bld

73
74

80

Defendants
Stan Caterbone

75
76
77
78
79
80
81

90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98

Appeal
Date

TR-0002658-06
NT-0000220-06

TR-0002645-06
TR-0004428-06

70

Firorill Careless Driving to Close

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)

Whiteford illegal stop said went through stope


sign, but did not.
Wagon Wheel?

68
69

Court
Case Description

Stan Caterbone

timeserved
timeserved
timeserved

Simms wrong on IFP got mad arrested me


Parking Meter

MDJ Smith/Dauphin Cty


MDJ Solomon/Duaphin

$997.50 verdict on July 20 2006

76.89
76.89

10/25/2006
10/16/2006
87.89
1/7/2007

325 Roth
75
112

7/7/2006
7/7/2006

Date

282.5
DISMISSED 01/18/200
DISMISSED 01/18/200

Date

Defendants

Judges

Description

Value

Description

Value

Notes

1/18/2007

Date

Common Pleas

Date

Defendants
Simms

100

Appeal Summary Conviction Eckert-Stoltzfus


Ap NT-0000569-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Harassment

8/11/2006

Burger

101

Appeal Summary Conviction Eckert-Stoltzfus


Ap NT-0000562-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Disorderly Conduct

8/7/2006

Michner

102

Appeal Summary Conviction Eckert-Stoltzfus


Ap NT-0000561-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Obstruct Roadway

8/11/2006

Michner

103

MD-6-2006

Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus

Judge Cullin Dismissed 01/09/2006

104
105

MD-10-2007

Appeal MD-6Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus


Nunc Pro Tunc

Reinaker DENIED 01/08/07

Judges
Cullin

Jan 16-Brief by Commonwealth, Parking Tickets and


Driving Under Suspension

Notes
TR-0008735;TR-0008578;TR-8721;TR0008503;TR-0007528

TR-0002184-06;tr-0002183-06;NT0000569-06;NT-0000561-06;NT-0000562
06
1/15/2006

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 50 of 190
3 of 4

Tuesday August 9, 2016


12/22/2007

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case


No.

A
c
t

Case No.

Court
Case Description

Court Venue

Filing
Date

Appeal
Date

Defendants

106
107

MD-11-2007
MD-12-2007

108

CP-36-SA-00001592006
Nunc Pro Tunc

Reinaker DENIED 01/05/07

109

MD-0006-2007

Eckert Change Venue

Reinaker DENIED 01/05/07 MOOT not


recorded until 01/08/2007

SA-158-07

Simms NT-0001707-2006

Common Pleas - Summary Conviction Harassment

6/4/2007

Simms/Gjurich

Ballentine TR-0002658-2006

Common Pleas - Summary Conviction w/o Insurnance

5/30/2007

Ballentine/Whiteford

110
111

Y
Y

SA-154-2007

TR-3557-06 Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets


Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (42 Active Cases)
Judges

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Description

Judement
Value

Notes

Reinaker DENIED 01/08/07


Reinaker DENIED 01/08/07

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Page 51 of 190
4 of 4

Tuesday August 9, 2016


12/22/2007

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third1Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
:
APPELLANT
:

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT


Outstanding Receivables with Pro Se Billings To Date of $4,295,443.24, December 2,
2015
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 2nd day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above
captioned case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the
deliberations of this case. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court
understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence
and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide
the

Court

with

sufficient

knowledge

of

the

APPELLANT'S

claim

of

the

value

of

the

Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 0523059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however
this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the
government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the
days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive
Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons under
oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.
/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone
Date: December 2, 2015

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 52 of 190

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third2Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001

Stan J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

December 2, 2015
U.S.C.A. 15-3400
E.D.C. 14-02559 Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus Appeal
Re: Outstanding Receivables with Pro Se Billings To Date
Item #1:

Advanced Media Group Invoices for September 3, 2015


Above includes invoice to Department of Defense for 23 years of
service as unwitting participant in experimentation of Mind Control in
the amount of $3,263,162.00
Documentation is provided for original invoices

TOTAL AMOUNT OF RECEIVABLES ..........................$ 3,861,115.74


Item #2:

Advanced Media Group Pro Se Billings and Sales Journal From


January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008
Pro Se Billings to December 31, 2008..... $284,327.50
Estimate of Pro Se Billings To Date .......$150,000.00
TOTAL PRO SE BILLINGS ..................... $434,327.50

TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES FOR ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


AS OF DECEMBER 2, 2015 .... $4,295,443.24

Stan J. Caterbone
APPELLANT, Pro Se
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 53 of 190

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third3Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0008

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Mark Hough, State Farm Agent
14 South Broad Street, No. 14
Lititz, PA 17543
Policy Number -38-EJ-8579-2
Lancaster City Police Incident Report No. 0711-22799
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Invoice of May 1, 2009


Claim for Loss at 1250
Fremont Street

$ 4,202.87

$ 4,202.87

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$35.02

$ 4,237.89

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$35.02

$ 4,272.92

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

UD

Updated Claim

$ 6,911.87

$ 6,911.87

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$ 6,969.47

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$ 7,027.27

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$ 7084.67

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$ 7,142.27

10/01/2009
11/01/2009

10/01/2009
11/01/2009

FC
FC

Finance Charge
Finance Charge

$
$

57.60
57.60

$ 7,199.87
$7,257.47

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,257.47

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,372.67

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,430.27

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,487.87

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,545.47

05/01/2010

05/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

57.60

$7,603.07

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$2,838.00

$10,441.00

6% Compounded Monthly

TOTAL DUE:

$10,441.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page54
2 of
of119
190

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third4Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0007

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster County Treasurer
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602

Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

310.49

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

315.49

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

320.49

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

325.49

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

330.49

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

335.49

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

340.49

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

345.49

10/01/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

350.49

11/01/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

355.49

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

360.49

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

365.49

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

370.49

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

375.49

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

380.49

05/01/2010

05/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

5.00

385.49

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

143.15

528.60

6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page55
3 of
of119
190

$ 528.60

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third5Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0006

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Harleysville Insurance Company
P.O. Box 198
Harleysville, PA 19438-9919

Claim No.'s:

MD-702274
MO-658554-U XC
MO-6546~9-U XC

Phone: 888.595.9876
Fax: 888.492.8954
E-mail: MA@harleysvillegroup.com

Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 14,782.79

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 14,917.93

04/1/2009

04/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,053.07

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,188.21

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,323.35

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,458.49

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,593.63

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,728.77

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,863.91

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 15,999.05

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,134.19

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,269.33

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,404.47

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,539.61

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,674.75

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

135.14

$ 16,809.89

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 6,270.00

$ 23,079.97

135.14

6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page56
4 of
of119
190

$23,079.97

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third6Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0005

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Drew Anthon, Owner
Eden Resort Inn
222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601

Case No. CI-05-03644 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas

Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 29,513.83

04/1/2009

04/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 29,783.64

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 30,053.45

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 30,323.26

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 30,593.07

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 30,862.88

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 31,132.69

10/1/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 31,402.50

11/1/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 31,672.31

12/1/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 31,942.12

01/1/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 32,211.33

02/1/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 32,481.14

03/1/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 32,751.55

04/1/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 33,021.36

05/1/2010

05/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

269.81

$ 33,291.17

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$12,417.60

$ 45,708.77

269.81

Balance
$ 29,244.02

6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page57
5 of
of119
190

$45,708.77

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third7Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0003

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
High Industries
1833 William Penn Way
Greenfield Industrial Park
Lancaster, PA 17601
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 18,724.22

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 18,895.39

04/1/2009

04/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,066.56

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,237.73

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,408.90

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,580.07

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,751.24

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 19,922.41

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,093.58

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,264.75

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,435.92

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,607.09

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,778.26

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 20,949.43

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 21,120.60

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

FC

Finance Charge

171.17

$ 29,233.60

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 8,113.00

$ 45,708.77

171.17

6% Compounded Monthly
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page58
6 of
of119
190

$29,233.60

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third8Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0004

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Fulton Bank of Fulton Financial Corporation
Accounts Payable
One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA
Foreclosure Overcharge Case No. CI-07-00019 and Case No. CI-06-02271
Date
Date Due
Reference Description
Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 82,170.02

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 82,921.19

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 83,672.36

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 84,423.53

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,174.70

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,925.87

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 86,677.04

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 87,428.21

10/01/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 88,179.38

11/01/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 88,930.55

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 89,681.72

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 90,432.85

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,184.02

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,935.23

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 92,686.40

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 35,603.38

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page59
7 of
of119
190

751.17

$128,289.78

$128,289.78

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third9Circuit
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0004

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Mark Reese, Sheriff
Lancaster County Sheriffs Department
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA
Foreclosure Overcharge Case No. CI-07-00019 and Case No. CI-06-02271
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 82,170.02

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 82,921.19

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 83,672.36

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 84,423.53

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,174.70

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,925.87

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 86,677.04

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 87,428.21

10/01/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 88,179.38

11/01/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 88,930.55

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 89,681.72

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 90,432.85

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,184.02

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,935.23

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 92,686.40

05/01/2010

05/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 93,437.57

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 35,603.38

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page60
8 of
of119
190

751.17

$128,289.78

$128,289.78

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
10Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0004

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Shawn Long, Esq.,
Barley Snyder, LLC
126 East King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA
Foreclosure Overcharge Case No. CI-07-00019 and Case No. CI-06-02271
Date
Date Due
Reference Description
Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 82,170.02

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 82,921.19

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 83,672.36

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 84,423.53

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,174.70

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 85,925.87

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 86,677.04

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 87,428.21

10/01/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 88,179.38

11/01/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 89,681.72

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 90,432.85

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,184.02

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 91,935.23

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

751.17

$ 92,686.40

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 35,603.38

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page61
9 of
of119
190

751.17

$ 88,930.55

$128,289.78

$128,289.78

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
11Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0001

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
S.N. Lombardo Development Company
c/o Benecon Insurance Company
3175 Oregon Pike
Leola, PA 17540
626 Charlotte Street Development Proposal
Date
Date Due
Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

02/01/2009

02/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

$ 2,335.92

03/01/2009

03/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,357.27

04/01/2009

04/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,378.62

05/01/2009

05/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,399.97

06/01/2009

06/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,421.32

07/01/2009

07/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,442.67

08/01/2009

08/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,464.02

09/01/2009

09/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,485.37

10/01/2009

10/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,506.72

11/01/2009

11/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,528.07

12/01/2009

12/01/2009

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,549.42

01/01/2010

01/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,570.77

02/01/2010

02/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,592.12

03/01/2010

03/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,613.47

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

FC

Finance Charge

21.35

$ 2,634.82

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

FC

Finance Charge

$ 1,012.10

$ 3,646.92

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 62
10 of 119
190

21.35

$ 3,646.82

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
12Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0009

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pfumm Contractors, Inc.,
58 South Duke Street
Millersville, PA 17551
Town and Country Lease of April 31, 1998
Date
Date Due
Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

Outstanding Payments
for Town & Country Lease
Executed on April 31, 1998
For 1994 Ford Explorer as
Per Agreement. See Attached
Exhibits.

$ 14,000.00

$ 14,000.00

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

Invoice

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,116.67

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,233.34

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,350.01

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,466.68

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,466.68

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,700.02

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,816.69

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 14,933.36

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 15,050.03

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 15,166.70

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 15,283.37

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

116.67

$ 15,400.04

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

PAID IN FULL Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control?

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 63
11 of 119
190

$ 5,744.21
TOTAL DUE:

$ 21,144.25

$ 0.00

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
13Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID: 0010

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
New Holland Dental
650 East Main Street
New Holland, PA 17557
Date

Date Due

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Balance

Outstanding Invoice

$ 2,600.00

2,618.00

Invoice Discrimination and Harassment during Free Dental Day of May 1, 2009 Patient traveled to
facility at Approx. 6:00 for free dental Services to get at least a Cavity filled after seeing it on
WGAL-T\/8 News at 5:30 am. At approximately 11:00 am patient received a Panoramic X-Ray
and approximately 10 minutes later the patient received a free dental Examination in the
examination room closest to Main Street, New Holland by a Dentist who identified himself as
being from Reading. The dentist examined the patient's mouth and described a large cavity (from
a prior filling falling out) that needed a crown or filling. Patient explained that he wanted a filling
and would opt for a crown at a later time. Dentist agreed and wrote the prognosis and treatment
for a filling on patient's chart. Patient was told to wait for his turn. The Dental Staff broke for
lunch, and patient immediately inquired about the number. Staff had told the yet to be treated
patients that approximately 70 to 80 people were already treated. Patient had number 366,
which meant that 65 persons were to be treated before him. The Staff told patient that he would
be one of first after lunch. It was now approximately 2:15 when 3 females approached the
patient in the waiting room and tried to explain that there was an infection in the area to be
treated, however the examining dentist made no mention of any infection or abscess. The patient
did not know if the girls were authorized, or even if they were part of the dental staff. The
patient demanded his X-Ray and walked out of the facility. The woman and 2 females that
identified themselves as coming from the Mt. Joy Career Technical Institute, namely the darker
student and the teacher were harassing all day.

8 Hours of Consulting Time


At $75.00 Per Hour for Time
Wasted on Promised Dental Care.
8- Gallons Gasoline
2- Hot Dogs
Harassment; Pain and Suffering

$600.00
$ 16.00
$ 2.00
$2,000.00

2009 BALANCE FORWARD


01/1/2010
02/1/2010
03/1/2010
04/1/2010
05/1/2010
09/03/2015

01/1/2010
02/1/2010
03/1/2010
04/1/2010
05/1/2010
09/03/2015

Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance
Finance

Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge

$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$
21.82
$ 1,074.19
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 64
12 of 119
190

$ 2,770.74
$
$
$
$
$
$

2,792.56
2,814.38
2,836.20
2,858.02
2,879.84
3,953.63

$ 3,953.63

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
14Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0011

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Social Security Administration
Suite 104
1809 Olde Homestead Lane
Lancaster, PA 17601-5957
Date

Date Due

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

06/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Disability/SSI Payments From


December 1, 2005 to May 1, 2009
42 Months at $835.00 per month $ 35,070.00

Balance

$ 35,070.00

06/1/2009

Finance Charge
Monthly Disability

$
$

292.25
835.00

$ 35,362.25

07/1/2009

Finance Charge
Monthly Disability

$
$

292.25
835.00

$ 36,489.50

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge
Monthly Disability

$
$

292.25
835.00

$ 37,616.75
$ 38,451.75

08/20/2009

08/20/2009

Payment

$21,460.00

$ 16,991.75

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

0.00

$ 16,991.75

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,133.35

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,274.95

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,416.55

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,558.15

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,669.75

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,841.35

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 17,982.95

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

141.60

$ 18,124.55

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 6,760.45

$ 24,885.00

$36,197.25
07/1/2009
$37,324.50

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 65
13 of 119
190

$ 24,885.00

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
15Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001

STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

0012

Account of:
Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation
7th Floor, Labor & Industry Building

651 Boas Street


Harrisburg, PA 17121

Date

Date Due

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

Invoice

18 months of Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation


Benefits from July 1, 1987 to December 1, 1988
At $400.00 Per Week
$21,600.00
Interest 10% Per Annually
$43,200.00

Invoice

18 months of Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation


Benefits from May 1, 1998 to August 1, 1999
At $400.00 Per Week
$36,000.00
Interest 10% Per Annually
$28,800.00
TOTAL

$129,600.00

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$130,680.00

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$131,760.00

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$132,840.00

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$133,920.00

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$135,000.00

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$136,080.00

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$137,160.00

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$138,240.00

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$139,320.00

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$140,400.00

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$141,480.00

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

1,080.00

$142,560.00

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$28,460.88

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 66
14 of 119
190

TOTAL DUE:

$170,020.88

$170,020.88
Tuesday
September
August

3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
16Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0014

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Southern Regional Police Department
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

Date

Date Due

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Balance

Stolen Cash of April 5, 2006 during


302 Incident
$ 743.00
Window Repair of April 5, 2006 during
302 Incident
$ 315.00
Towing & Storage of April 5, 2006 during
302 Incident
$ 280.00
Subtotal
$ 1,388.40
Interest to June 1, 2009

$ 443.00

$ 1,781.40

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Finance Charge

0.00

$ 1,781.40

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,796.25

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,811.10

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,825.95

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,840.80

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,855.65

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,870.50

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,885.36

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,900.21

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,915.05

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,929.90

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

14.85

$ 1,944.75

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 725.39

$ 2,670.14

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 67
15 of 119
190

$ 2,670.14

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
17Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001

STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

0015

Account of:
Lancaster Employment Training Agency LETA
1016 North Charlotte Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

Date

Date Due

06/1/2009

05/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Invoice Individual Training Account (ITA)


Provider Service Title:
Paralegal Studies
$14,000.00
See Attached Exhibits

Balance

$ 14,000.00

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,116.67

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,233.34

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,350.01

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,466.69

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,583.35

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,700.02

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,816.69

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 14,933.36

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 15,050.03

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 15,166.70

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

$ 116.67

$ 15,283.37

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 5,700.69
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 68
16 of 119
190

$ 20,984.06

$ 20,984.06

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
18Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0016

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
State Farm Insurance
100 State Farm Place
Ballstron Spa, NY 12020-8000

Re: Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509


Pennsylvania Department of Insurance No. 09-169-68443
Date

Date Due

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Balance

Self Insurance Fund


33% of $35,000.00 Contents Coverage
Failure to Honor Claims Per
Contract Pursuant to State and
Federal Laws $ 11,666.67
See Attached Exhibits
$11,666.67
$11,666.67

7/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,763.90

8/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,861.13

9/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,958.36

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,055.59

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,152.82

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,347.28

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,444.51

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,541.74

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,638.97

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,736.20

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 4,750.60

$ 17,486.80

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 69
17 of 119
190

$ 17,486.80

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
19Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID: 0017

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
The Lancaster Bureau of Police
39 West Chestnut Street
Lancaster, PA 17603-3510

Re: State Department of Insurance File No. 09-169-68443


State Farm Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Invoice

7/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$11,814.31

8/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$11,911.95

9/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,009.59

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,107.23

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,204.87

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,302.51

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,400.15

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,497.79

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,595.43

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,693.07

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.64

$12,790.71

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

New Front Door From Illegal 302 on July 9, 2015

600.00

$ 13,390.71

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 4,994.73

$ 18,385.44

Self Insurance Fund


33% of $35,000.00 Contents Coverage
Failure to Honor Claims Per
Contract Pursuant to State and
Federal Laws $ 11,666.67
See Attached Exhibits
$11,666.67
$11,666.67

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 70
18 of 119
190

$ 18,385.44

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
20Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0018

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pennsylvania Department of Insurance
Bureau of Consumer Services

1209 Strawberry Square


Harrisburg, PA 17120

Re: State Department of Insurance File No. 09-169-68443


State Farm Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

Balance

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Invoice

7/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,763.90

8/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,861.13

9/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$11,958.36

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,055.59

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,152.82

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,250.05

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,347.28

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,444.51

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,541.74

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,638.97

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

97.23

$12,736.20

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 4,750.60

Self Insurance Fund


33% of $35,000.00 Contents Coverage
Failure to Honor Claims Per
Contract Pursuant to State and
Federal Laws $ 11,666.67
See Attached Exhibits
$11,666.67
$11,666.67

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 71
19 of 119
190

$ 17,486.80

$ 17,486.60

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
21Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0013

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster County Assistance Office LCAO
Pennsylvania Department of Welfare
832 Manor Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603

Date

Date Due

05/1/2009

05/1/2009

Reference
Invoice

Description

Amount

Balance

Food Stamp Benefits with a Free $ 5,920.00


Red Rose Transit Authority Bus Pass
October 1, 2006 to May 1, 2008
32 Months at $185.00 per Month
Legal Costs 4 Appeals
at $2,500 Each

$10,000.00

$15,920.00

06/1/2009

06/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,052.67

07/1/2009

07/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,185.34

08/1/2009

08/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,318.01

09/1/2009

09/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,450.68

10/1/2009

10/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,583.35

11/1/2009

11/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,716.02

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,848.69

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 16,981.36

02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 17,114.03

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 17,246.70

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 17,379.37

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

132.67

$ 17,512.04

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 6,531.99

$ 24,044.03

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 72
20 of 119
190

$ 24,044.03

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
22Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0020

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
State Auto Insurance Company

Eastern Regional Office


PO Box 2006
Mechanicsburg PA 17055-0733
(717)697-1121
Claim Number: CATE-0285037-090409
Loss Date: 09/04/2009
Insured: STANLEY CATERBONE

Date

Date Due

12/1/2009

12/1/2009

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

02/1/2010

Reference

Description

Amount

Invoice Parts and Labor for Rear Bumper

Balance

$700.00

$ 700.00

Finance Charge

5.83

$ 705.83

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

5.83

$ 711.66

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

5.83

$ 717.49

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

5.83

$ 723.32

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

5.83

$ 729.15

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

$ 271.97
TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 73
21 of 119
190

$1,001.12

$ 1001.12

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
23Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0021

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
United States Department of Defense
Ashton Carter
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000
Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

01/1/2010

01/1/2010

23 Years of Service of unwitting experimentation


under U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
for the development and deployment
of U.S. Military weapons and systems
$100,000.00 per Year1

Balance

$2,300,000.00

See attached:
Federal Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S Sponsored Mind

Control

Executive Summary, September 13, 2009 With Ground Zero


See Supporting Documentation by Visiting:

1.Memo to Secretary Robert Gates of April 7, 2009


2.http://www.scribd.com/doc/24371616/Submission-to-U-S-Department-of-Defense-Website-Re-U-SSecretary-of-Defense-Robert-Gates-April-7-2009

3.ISC & Pakistan Missle Project Called Khyber-Pass


4.http://www.scribd.com/doc/24366542/ISC-and-the-Pakistan-Missle-Deals-of-1986-Called-TheKhyber-Pass-Project

5.CIA Torture Investigations EIT Program & SERE and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control by Stan J. Caterbone,
October 2, 2009 Used as Exhibit in Human Rights Complaint to U.N. Council for Human Rights

6.http://www.scribd.com/doc/23900626/CIA-Torture-Investigations-EIT-Program-SERE-and-U-SSponsored-Mind-Control-by-Stan-Caterbone-October-2-2009
02/1/2010

02/1/2010

Finance Charge

19,166.66

$2,300,019.66

03/1/2010

03/1/2010

Finance Charge

19,166.66

$2,740,671.74

04/1/2010

04/1/2010

Finance Charge

19,166.66

$2,357.499.98

05/1/2010

05/1/2010

Finance Charge

19,166.66

$2,376,666.54

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

$88,495.46

$3,263,162.00

Finance Charge

TOTAL DUE:

$3,263,162.00

Fee for service does not include interest, penalties, or any damages to health and welfare of Stanley J.
Caterbone.
Advanced
DRAFT-PETITION
Media Group
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 74
22 of 119
190
Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
24Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

0022

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT)
Bureau of Drivers Licensing

P.O. Box 68693


Harrisburg, PA 17106-8693
Re:

Lic No. 18195782


WID No. 100548019003570 001
Stan J. Caterbone, Licensee

Date

Date Due

Reference

02/16/2010

03/01/2010

Illegal Suspension and Revocation2 $500.00 Per Day


of Pennsylvania Drivers Privileges
for a Period of One Year Due To
Subversion and Obstruction of
Appeal of Trial Court Case No. 3179-06
to Superior Court of Pennsylvania and
Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest
12 Days From February 16 to March 1
$6,000.00

$6.000.00

31 Days at $500.00 Per Day

$15,550.00

$21,550.00

$8,038.15

$ 29,588.15

04/01/2010

04/01/2010

09/03/2015

09/03/2015

Finance Charge

Description

Amount

TOTAL DUE:

2 See Attached Documents For Review ON ORIGINAL INVOICE ONLY!


DRAFT-PETITION
Advanced
Media Group
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 75
23 of 119
190

Balance

$ 29,588.15

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
25Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
STATEMENT
Statement Date
September 3, 2015
Customer ID:

Advanced Media Group


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

Re:

Account of:
City of Lancaster
Attention: Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization Unit
120 North Duke Street
Lancaster City Rehab Program Application & Denial

Date

Date Due

Reference

Description

Amount

0023

Balance

On May 19, 2015 Stan Caterbone visited City Hall with the application for the Lancaster City Rehab
Program as instructed By an employee of the City of Lancaster. Stan Caterbone had met with the
employee on several occasions regarding the Application and approval process.
The week before Stan Caterbone had delivered a Contractors Application from a local Contractor
named Mark Nuchi, ($2,700 estimate for a new roof; which is in dire need of repair) a local roofer. The
employee had told Stan Caterbone to complete the application in advance Of transferring the Deed of
1250 Fremont Street from the Estate of Yolanda Caterbone. On May 19, 2015 Darren Palmer, the
Inspector and Marrisol Torres reviewed the application and Stan Caterbone questioned them on
whether the review process included any sort of requirements regarding the amount of assets listed on
the application. They both told Stan Caterbone that all financial assets receive a multiple of 2.5 times
the amount and that amount is included in the income analysis for the income requirements as
outlined on the website under HUD requirements.
Stan Caterbone became frustrated because the website lists In detail all requirements for financial
review. No where on the website does it mention any analysis or limits of assets. Marrisol Torres
responded that the asset analysis is included in the handbook from HUD. Stan Caterbone asserted that
he spent some 25 hours preparing the application.
Stan Caterbone does not believe that the City of Lancaster was being truthful and it was another case
of trying to avert his rights to enter the Lancaster City Rehab Program. The City of Lancaster has
failed to present any such requirement in writing and Stan Caterbone pressed the employees on why
such requirement is omitted on the website. That is not fair and may be A violation of HUD policy.
06/22/2015

New Central Air Conditioner and Handler


Installed on June 22, 2015 by Schwanger Bros.
New Roof

TOTAL DUE:

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Recievables
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 76
24 of 119
190

$2,675.00
$2,700.00

$5,375.00

Tuesday
September
August 3,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
26Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Advanced Media Group 2007
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007

Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1

Invoice No

0001
S.N. Lombardo Development
Ralph Mazzocchi
717-394-3422

7001

0 - 30

31 - 60

0001
S.N. Lombardo Development

0002
Yolanda Caterbone

7002

0002
Yolanda Caterbone

0003
High Industries
S. Dale High

7003

0003
High Industries

0004
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff
Terry Bergman

7004

0004
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff

0005
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn
Drew Anthon

7005

0005
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn

0006
Harleysville Insurance Company
Claims Department

7006
7007

0006
Harleysville Insurance Compan

0007

7008

Over 90 days

Amount Due

1,871.00

1,871.00

1,871.00

1,871.00

1,545.00

1,545.00

1,545.00

1,545.00

15,221.40

15,221.40

15,221.40

15,221.40

67,147.45

67,147.45

67,147.45

67,147.45

24,118.00

24,118.00

24,118.00

24,118.00

7,898.19
6,878.25

7,898.19
6,878.25

14,776.44

14,776.44

944.90

944.90

Lancaster County Treasurer


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 77 of 190
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

61 - 90

Page 1 of 39

Tuesday August 9, 2016


05.17.2007

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
27Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Advanced Media Group 2007
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007

Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1

Invoice No

0 - 30

31 - 60

61 - 90

Over 90 days

Amount Due

Chris Reed

0007
Lancaster County Treasurer

Report Total

944.90

106,986.79

944.90

16,766.40

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 78 of 190


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 2 of 39

1,871.00

125,624.19

Tuesday August 9, 2016


05.17.2007

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900

Page:
76Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT

:
:
:
:

MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION BY APPELANT re


Advanced Media Group Pro Se Billings and Sales
Journal From January 1, 2007 to August 31, 2008

I hereby on this 9th

day of November, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the

attached document as an EXHIBIT, Advanced Media Group Pro Se Billings and Sales Journal
From January 1, 2007 to August 31, 2008.

If it would please The court to consider the

appropriate law that would grant the APPELLANT at least this amount $284,702.50 in pro se billings considering
the magnitude and duration of the APPELLANTS pain and suffering.

Date: November 9, 2015

/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone


Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page 79 of 190

Tuesday August 9, 2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name
AMG Chapter 11
3/1/2007 Bankruptcy

003112143900
Page: 77
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Item Description
May 2005 Research Filing of Petition for Bankruptcy,
Russell Kraft, Nettleton & Fenefrock
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
May 23 2005 File for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Protection in Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing
Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required
Documents to
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

20

$125.00

$2,500.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$625.00

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

$125.00

$625.00

Jul 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Aug 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Sep 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Oct 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Nov 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Jun 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant Designation of
Contents For Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and
Findings of Fact Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: #
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

Dec 2005 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules F & G Filed by
Amended Matrix Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt
Number 20074028, Fee Amount $26.00. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 12/16/2005)
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Jan 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Feb 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Apr 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

May 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Jun 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss
Case, or Conversion of Case to Chapter 7 Filed by
United States Trustee (
Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$1,050.00

Jul 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Aug 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Sep 2006 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

10

$125.00

Jan 2007 Administration, Reporting and


Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
6/17/2007

Qty

Apr 30 2007 Notice of Appeal to Thrid Circuit from


Chapter 11 re Amend Filing Date Case No. 07-2150
May 10 2007 Application to procedd In Forma
Pauperis Filed
May 21 2007 Motion For Recusal of Judge Rendell
Filed
May 29 2007 Order Granted for In Forma Pauperis;
Proceed to 3 Judge Panel for Review to Continue
June 8 2007 Motion to Dismiss by Department of
Justice (Appellee) by J. Adams
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

$1,250.00
$25,800.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$625.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page80
1 of 44
190

$375.00
$1,750.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 78
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
June 2 2005 Order Granting Application To Pay Filing
Fees In Installments. (Related Doc # 4);
June 13 2005 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's
Failure to Timely File Required Documents. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)
June 21 2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Affai
06/21/2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Aff
07/01/2005 Appellant Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Fact
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: # I
Findi
09/21/2005 District Court Order entered within Civil
Action # 05-CV-3689 Notice of Appeal Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order
Dismissing
10/05/2005 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita
B. Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal (CA-05-3689)
Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Ca
11/08/2005 Notice of Hearing to Show Cause why
this case should
not be not be Dismissed for
Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay Filing Fees for Chapter
1

Item Description

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$625.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$875.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed


Court Time Hours Billed

3
6

$125.00
$150.00

$375.00
$900.00

Jan 9 2006 File Order Entered that if a certificate of


service of the amended schedules or amended matrix
is not filed within 20 days from the date of this orde Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

01/23/2006 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J.


Caterbone - RE: Amended Schedules and Response to
Creditor Status Order (related document(s)27). (P.,
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00

25

$125.00

$3,125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$500.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

12

$125.00

$1,500.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$500.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$900.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

11/16/2005 Meeting of Creditors . 341 (a) meeting


to be held on 12/15/2005 at 12:30 PM at 3cnfrm 3rd Floor Conference Room. Last day to oppose dis
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
11/29/2005 Drive to Reading to Final Installment
Payment. Receipt Number 20073978, Fee Amount
$839.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/29/2005) Drive to
Reading Co
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Chapter 11 Case
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
12/15/2005 Response dated 12/14/2005 Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding HEMAP Appeal
Hearing Request. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 12/16/2005)
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation

01/24/2006 Motion for Relief from Stay. Fee Amount


$150, Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by SHAWN
M. LONG (Counsel). Objections due by 2/8/2006. (A Chapter 11 Hours Billed
01/30/2006 Amended Schedule F (creditor added)
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number
20074148, Fee Amount $26.00 (P., Cathy) (Entered:
01/31/2006)
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
01/30/2006 Advanced Media Group Income
Statements for the year 2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # !_ Continuation of
Reports) (P., Cathy)
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
02/02/2006 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone - RE: Amended Schedules (related
document(s)35). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/02/2006)
02/02/2006 Debtor's Response to Motion of Fulton
Bank for Relief From Stay ; Response and Exhibits
thereto Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone (related do
02/10/2006 Monthly Operating Report for Filing for
the month of January 2006 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/10/2006)
02/21/2006 Hearing Held on 31 Motion for Relief
from Stay Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel). Matter Taken Under
Advisement. (S., B
02/23/2006 Order Granting Motion for Relief from
Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, PA Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LON
03/20/2006 Debtor Request for Hearing, and
Certificate of Service thereto Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/20/2006)
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Chapter 11 Case
03/31/2006 Order DENYING Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing because nothing is pending
before this Court on which a hearing might be held,
(related d
04/10/2006 Request for Continuance of Chapter 11
Case Filed'by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 04/10/2006)
04/10/2006 Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Stay
All Proceedings (Request for Continuance) because
nothing is presently pending before this Court that
would

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page81
2 of 44
190

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 79
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Item Description
05/03/2006 Order (copy) entered in District Court
within Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered that the
Appellant's motion for continuance is Denied as Moot
(con
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
05/30/2006 05/30/2006 05/30/2006 Motion to
Convert Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount $15.00,
Motion to Dismiss Case Filed by United States Trustee
Represente
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$900.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

09/27/2006 Notice of Briefing Schedule issued by US


District Court - RE: Notice of Appeal Civil Action 064212 (related document(s)83). (P., Cathy)
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$375.00

02/09/2007 Letter Received from Debtor Stanley J.


Caterbone in response to memorandum regarding
Local Rule 9014-3. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/13/2007) Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$250.00

06/08/2006 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J.


Caterbone Regarding Documents sent to US Trustee's
Office. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/08/2006)
06/29/2006 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss
Case, or Conversion of Case to Chapter 7 Filed by
United States Trustee (related document(s),60).
**MATTER T
07/10/2006 Debtor's Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered:
07
07/17/2006 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita
B. Brody Regarding Debtor's Notice of Appeal (Civil
Action #06-1538) of Bankruptcy Order dated
2/23/200
07/18/2006 Debtor's Request (dated 7/14/2006) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(En
07/20/2006 Memorandum In Support of Motion to
Dismiss Filed by United States Trustee Dept of Justice
Dave P. Adams
08/03/2006 Hearing Set re Debtor's Request for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone (related
document 67

08/16/2006 Motion Debtor Request Continuance


Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Represented by
Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 08/16/2006)
Chapter
08/17/2006 Hearing Scheduled to provide court with
difinitive report status of Chapter 11 and to address
questions about the future Heaing Notice Never
Recieved
Chapter
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Chapter 11 Case
Chapter
08/25/2006 DOCKETED IN ERROR: entered on main
case, should be on adversary- See Adversary 062236***Attach PDF Document: Copy of Notice of
Appeal
Chapter
08/31/Order Entered that the Bench Order Entered on
today's Record DENYING 67 Debtor's Request (dated
7/6/2006) for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed IFP
Chapter

10/03/2006 Order Granting United States Trustee's


Motion to Dismiss Case, (related document(s)60). (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 10/03/2006)
10/19/2006 Notice of Appeal to District Court - RE:
Order entered 10/3/2006 Granting United States
Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case ; Notice of Appeal,
and
01/18/2007 Motion for Debtor's Request (dated
1/13/2007) for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbon
01/19/2007 Order DENYING Motion for Debtor's
(Second) Request for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
01/19/2007 Order DENYING Motion for Debtor's
(Second) Request for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
02/05/2007 Updated Creditor Matrix/Amendment to
List of Creditors (5 new names) Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone (Neither Amended Schedules nor Certific
02/05/2007 Application to Waive Fee Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Represented by Self(Counsel).
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/05/2007)
02/05/2007 Motion to Reconsider Order DENYING
Motion for Debtor's (Second) Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ;
M
02/07/2007 Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order dated 1/19/2007 and DENYING
Debtor's Application to Waive Fee. (related
document(s)105, 1

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page82
3 of 44
190

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 80
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Item Description
02/20/2007 Notice of Appeal to District Court of
Order entered 2/7/2007 DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order DENYING Debtor's Application to
Wa
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
02/26/2007 Corrective Entry - RE: Notice of Appeal
of Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Reconsider
Order and Debtor's Application to Waive Fee Filed by
Stanl
Chapter 11 Hours Billed

3/16/2007 Federal Habeau Corpus

AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy


Nov 20, 2006 - General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case Harbeas Corpus
filed from Lancaster County Prison on November 17,
2006
January 19, 2007 - ADDENDUM to 2241 Habeas
Corpus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service, (gs) (Entered: 01/22/2007)
April 17, 2007 - ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL
PROMPTLY FURNISH PETITIONER WITH THE IN
FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION FORM AND
PETITIONER SHALL EITHER COMPLETE AND RET

May 31, 2007 - EXHIBIT to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241


Habeas Corpus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service (gs) (Entered: 06/01/2007)
June 4, 2007 - EXHIBIT to U.S.C. Sec. 2241 Habeas
Copus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (gs)
(Entered: 06/04/2007)
Federal Habeau Corpus
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone v. Penn DOT On Pro Se Civil Case
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Penn DOT
Caterbone v.
Aug 2 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone,Michael
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint
Aug 24 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Default Notice
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael
Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint & In Forma
Caterbone v. Penn DOT Pauperis Denied by Georgelis
Aug 25 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Refiled In Forma Pauperis Granted
by Cullen
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case Filed Appeal to Superior
Court of Pennsylvania
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case Transfered from Superior Court to
Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas
Caterbone v. Penn DOT
Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone v. PP&L
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint with Advanced
Media Group
Electric
10 Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Chapter 11 Case Transfered to
Chapter 11 Case by PP&L
Caterbone v. PP&L Electric
Caterbone v. Southern
Regional

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$1,000.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$125.00
$23,825.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

15

$125.00

$1,875.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$250.00
$3,000.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

10

$125.00

$125.00

$1,250.00
$1,000.00
$2,250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

10

$125.00

$125.00

$1,250.00
$250.00
$1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

15

$125.00

$1,875.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$625.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$1,000.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$250.00
$3,750.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Billed

$125.00

$1,000.00
$125.00
$1,125.00

Feb 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done


On Pro Se Civil Case Meetings & Communications with Civil Litigation Hours
Chief of Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Billed
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Meetings & Communications with
Chief of Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Prepared Complaint and Email to
Don Totaro, Lancaster County DA
Apr 11 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case

Unit
Price

03/06/2007 Order Supplementing Order of February


7, 2007, pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 8001-1
(c)(related document(s)K)6). (B., Keith) (Entere
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
03/20/2007 District Court Acknowledgement of
receiving Bankruptcy Appeal (CA-07-1093) Signed by
Deputy Clerk Steve Tomas - RE: Notice of Appeal to
District
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
05/18/2007 Notice of Change of Address Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone . (P.,Cathy) (Entered:
05/18/2007) 05/18/2007 Operating Report/Balance
05/18/2007 Operating port/Balance Sheet
5/31/2007, Income Statement for 5 months ending
5/31/2007, Aged Receivables as of 5/31/2007 Filed
by Stanley

Qty

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

15

$125.00

$1,875.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$500.00

20

$125.00

$2,500.00

$125.00

$500.00

May 15 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work


Done On Pro Se Civil Case Certificate of Service
Personal Delivery to William Cambell of Quarryville

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$625.00

Jun 10 2006 Motion for Continuance General Hours


Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page83
4 of 44
190

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Name

Line Description
Item Description
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to Preliminary Objections
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Civil Case
Billed
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior Court of
Hours Billed For Civil
Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation Shawn
Long Appeared at Defendants Table before Court,
walked out
Court Time Hours Billed
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended Complaint from Bausman
Post Office, General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed For Civil
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
Nov 7 2006 Filed for Continuance from Lancaster
Civil Litigation Hours
County Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
Caterbone v. Southern Regional
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Filed
Caterbone v. Millersville General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Poli
Civil Case IFP Granted Judge Ashworth
Billed
Mar 26 2007 File Response to Preliminary Objections
to Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas General
Civil Litigation Hours
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Billed
Case
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis
Caterbone v. Benjamin General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Roda
Civil Case IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Billed

Caterbone v.
Harleysville et

Caterbone v. Grassell,
Thomas

Caterbone v. Lancaster
General

Caterbone v.
Pflumm,Mike et al

Common of PA v. S.
3/17/2007 Caterbone

3/18/2007

003112143900
Page: 81
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma Pauperis Application


Filed & Approved by Judge Joseph Madenspacher
Caterbone v. Benjamin Roda
Aug 1 2006 Complaint & Informa Pauperis Filed with
Advanced Media Group - General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case, IFP Granted
by Georgeli
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of Default Filed General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to Preliminary Objections General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of Arbitration - General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60 Day Continuance General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended Complaint - General Hours


Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Harleysville et
Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint - General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Jun 6 2006 Filed Important Notice of Default General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Grassell, Thomas
Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint, walked to Courthouse
directly after discharge from Hospital - General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended Complaint - General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Case
Caterbone v. Lancaster General
May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis
Application - General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by Judge
Reinaker
Caterbone v. Pflumm,Mike et al
2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking
Meter Violation MDJ Simms
2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation For
Parking Meter Violation
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking
Meter Violation MDJ Simms
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
MDJ Simms Parking Meter Violation
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
May 10 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case 18$2709$$A3
Harassment w/Tim Decker Killing of Cat SRPD
Humane Legue Witness
Sep 28 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Notice of
Appeal Stolen From Mail, Never Appeared For Trial,
Judge Allison
Fines $442.00 Paid General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Jan 09 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Filed Nunc Pro
Tunc, Denied by Reainaker

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

12

$125.00

$1,500.00

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

$150.00

$600.00

12

$125.00

$1,500.00

$125.00

$250.00
$12,100.00

15

$125.00

20

$125.00

$1,875.00

$2,500.00
$4,375.00

$125.00

$125.00

$1,000.00
$500.00
$1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

20

$125.00

$2,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$875.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$625.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$875.00
$5,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

15

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$1,875.00
$500.00
$2,375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

25

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$3,125.00
$1,000.00
$4,125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$1,000.00
$1,000.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00
$1,875.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page84
5 of 44
190

$125.00

$250.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 82
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Jan 19 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Refiled, Denied
Again
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case MDJ
Hamilton, Fire M. Bomberger, Public Defender, MDJ
Hamilton Guilty
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case $75$3733$$A M2
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co Prison
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Continued Judge
Ashworth (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co
Prison
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
Judge Farina (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Janice Longer
Appo
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to Lancaster County Bar
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to Longer Petition to
Withdraw From Case General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case Meeting with Janice Longer
To Prepare
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen Continued Case
to April Court ScheduleTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court Diciplinary Complaint
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 22 2007 Research & Review Pa Consolodated
Statutes Annotated at Law Library General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Review Motion to
Dismiss QuashGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Judge Reuter,
Bezzard had to Refile or Dismiss General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case East
Lampeter Twp
May 18 2006 Lancaster County DA Office Refile
Charges General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case 4 Charges-Harras Dis
Ord,Theft,Harrasment
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt Bomberger, Public
Defender General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Lanaster County
Court of Common PleasTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma Pauperis Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of Particulars Discovery
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Judge AllisonTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge Farina Time
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge FarinaTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation From Lancaster
County Prison
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From
Lancaster County Prison Law Library
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina Sent to 1250 Fremont
& 220 Stone Hill Rd to get files Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation Dismiss Harassment,
Change to Summa
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation Guilty Harrasment & Disorderly Conduct,
Not Guilty Thef of Service
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals & Motions General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case From Lancaster County Prison
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to Superior Court Case
No. MDA 125 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript & ReGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case

Item Description
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal

Qty
2

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

$125.00

Credit
Amount
$250.00

$500.00
Hours Billed For Criminal
Case

12

$125.00

$1,500.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Court Time Hours Billed


Court Time Hours Billed

4
4

$150.00
$150.00

$600.00
$600.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$625.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$750.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$625.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$625.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$625.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case
Court Time Hours Billed

2
0.1

$125.00
$150.00

$250.00
$15.00
$8,990.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case
Court Time Hours Billed

2
10

$125.00
$150.00

$250.00
$1,500.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$500.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$250.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$500.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$750.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$750.00

Research Hours Billed

$75.00

$525.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$1,050.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$750.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$750.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$375.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page85
6 of 44
190

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

Common of PA v S.
Caterbone

003112143900
Page: 83
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections Office for Payment of Fines and Costs and
Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections to Have Payment Due Removed General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office Correspondence &
Complaint to SRPDTime For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to MDJ Eckert Picked Up
by Constables General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus to U.S. District Court
of Eastern District of PA General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Lanc Pri
Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From Lancaster
County Prison Law Library
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of Mandamus From Lancaster
County PrisonGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case

Item Description

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

Credit
Amount
$500.00

$250.00
$11,650.00

Court Time Hours Billed

10

$150.00

$1,500.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$625.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$875.00

Research Hours Billed

$75.00

$375.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$1,000.00

Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for Continuance/Change


Venue General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Hours Billed For Criminal
Pro Se Criminal Case Moved From Eckert to Stotlzfus Case

$125.00

$375.00

Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ StoltzfusTime For Court


Appearance and Litigation Guilty Harr, Dis Con, Obs,
Dismiss DUSus Fin Responsi Fine $954 Joe Caterbone Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$900.00

$125.00

Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo Appeal to Lancaster


County Court of Common Pleas General Hours Billed Hours Billed Criminal
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Appeal
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ Commins Robert M. Fedor
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case 2 Girls Walking Guilty Fine $315.66
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal Trial Judge Perezous
Found Guilty ?? April 2 Day of Daylight Person Broke
Into 220 Stone Hill Road, Mike on Cell Phone, Kennet
SPoli
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ Hamilton General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Fines $367.50
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary Appeal to Court of
Common PleasGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for Continuance From
Lancaster County PrisonJudge Cullen Denied General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Dec 2006 Lancaster County Prison Law Library
Research Billed For Case
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous Granted Motion For
Continuance Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Dec 22 2006 Motion for Transcripts Filed from
Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted
Judge Perezous General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Eckert
From Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case

3/20/2007

Qty

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$625.00

$375.00
$1,000.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$1,000.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$375.00

Research Hours Billed

$75.00

$375.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$600.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$250.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00
$3,600.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Commins


From Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed
Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Case
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for Change of Venue Deinied
Judge Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Case
Jan 11 2007 Motion for Continance Filed Denied Judge
Hours Billed
Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case
Case
Jan 17 2007 Motion for Reconsideration Filed Denied
Judge Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Hours Billed
On Pro Se Criminal Case
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 12 2007 File Change of Venue/ Continuance
MDEckert Citations Denied by Judge Cullen General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Hours Billed
Appeal Case
Appeal
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case

$625.00
$6,275.00

For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal

$125.00

$750.00

$125.00

$750.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$500.00

$125.00

$500.00
$2,875.00

For Criminal

$125.00

$250.00
$250.00

Criminal

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page86
7 of 44
190

$125.00

$500.00
$500.00

$125.00

$500.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 84
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File In Forma
Pauperis for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Item Description

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

Common of PA v S.
3/22/2007 Caterbone

Debit
Amount
$500.00

$125.00

Credit
Amount

$500.00

$125.00

$500.00
$500.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$250.00
$250.00

July 15, 2005 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY


CATERBONE from the order of Bankruptcy Judge
Thomas M. Twardowski. (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005) Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
July 15, 2005 - Briefing Schedule 7/18/05 Entered
and copies mailed, (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
July 28, 2005 - BRIEF TO ORDER TO DISMISS ON
6/13/05 by STANLEY CATERBONE. (ami, ) (Entered:
07/29/2005)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
September 23, 2005 - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY
OCTOBER 3, 2005, WHY IN LIGHT OF DEBTORAPPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (BKY. DOCKET #12)
AND BRIEF (DOCKET #3), THIS C
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
October 3, 2005 - RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED by UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
October 6, 2005 - ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS
REINSTATED IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT DEBTORAPPELLANT COMPLY WITH THE RULES
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
November 7, 2005 - Original Bankruptcy Record
returned to the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, (afm, ) (Entered: 1
1/08/2005)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
November 14, 2005 - Letter from U.S. BANKRUPTCY
COURT re: received original record on 11/10/05.
(afm, ) (Entered: 11/14/2005)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
May 15 2006 File Appeal to Automatic Stay Order of
Judge Fehling to Judge Anita Brody General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Hours Billed Criminal
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal Case
Appeal
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal
Sept 18, 2006 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP from the
order of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E. Fehling. (tj,)
Chapter 11 Amend
Hours Billed For Civil
Dismissal
(Entered: 09/18
Appeals
October 10, 2007 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY
J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP from the
order of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E. Fehling. (tj,)
Hours Billed For Civil
(Entered: 09
Appeals
October 17, 2007 - Brief in Opposition re 3
Appellant's Brief by PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
(HENRY, MICHAEL) Modified on 10/18/2006 (np).
Hours Billed For Civil
(Entered: 10/17/2006)
Appeals
November 15, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gs) Additional
attachment(s) added on 12/13/2006 (mo,). (Entered: Hours Billed For Civil
11/16/2006) fro
Appeals
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed For Civil
Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
February 7, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO
SE,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
Hours Billed For Civil
02/09/2007)
Appeals
February 21, 2007 - ORDER that APPELLANT STANLEY
J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE IS
Hours Billed For Civil
GRANTED. APPELLANT MAY FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN
THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CAS
Appeals

Chapter 11 Amend Dismissal


Jan 4 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court
Filed at Lancaster County Clerk of CoGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Jan 11 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 12 2997 Filed Concise Statement of Matters
Complainted on Appeal General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case

Unit
Price

$500.00

Chapter 11 Dismissal
Appeal

April 13, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED


BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288,
PAPER NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered: 04/13/2007)
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case

Qty

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals

$125.00

$500.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$1,000.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00
$3,125.00

20

$125.00

$2,500.00
$2,500.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$625.00

1.5

$125.00

$187.50

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00
$3,312.50

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

12

$125.00

$1,500.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page87
8 of 44
190

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

Common of PA v. S.
Caterbone

003112143900
Page: 85
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Item Description
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with Lancaster County Clerk of
Courts Review & Correct Index of RecorGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Hours Billed Criminal
Case
Appeal
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S 28th St. Harrisburg
Guilty MDJ Smith Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter For Payment of Fine
& Costs General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith Re Payment of Fines
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application For Leave Nunc Pro
TuncGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma Pauperis In Dauphin
County Court of Common Pleas Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court in
Dauphin County Court MDA 435-2007 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone

Mar 25 2007 Filed Docketing Statement to Superior


Court of Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Mar 27 2007 File Response to Fulton Bank Motion to
Fulton Bank v
Dismiss Case General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
3/28/2007 Caterbone, Stan
Fulton Bank v Caterbone, Stan
110/20/2006 - File Federal False Claims Act, No
Complaint Copy Satute FMG, AMG, Global, Radio
Science Laboratories, Power Productions v. ISC,
Federal False Claims Act Attorney General,
11/16/2006 - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(tj, )
(Entered: 10/23/2006)
11/16/2006 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS
CASE IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO S
COMPLAINT AGAINST ATTORNEY GENERAL,
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, LTD., ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
02/07/2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered: 02/09/2007)
Mar 16 2007 Letter to U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
Regarding Obstruciton of Justice General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 12 2007 Meet Lisa Owings staffer on Judiciary
Comitte from Senator Specter at Chamber Building
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Mar 13 2007 Letter to Lisa Owings of Senator Specter
Office General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 19 2007 Letter to Lisa Owings of Senator Specter
Office General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 20 2007 Letter to Lisa Owings of Senator Specter
Office General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
03/23/2007 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL
SUBMIT A COPY OF HIS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
BY 4/6/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
ON 3/22/07. 3/23/07 ENTERE
Common of PA v S.
Caterbone

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

$125.00

Credit
Amount

$375.00
$2,625.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$500.00

Court Time Hours Billed

$150.00

$750.00

Hours Billed For Criminal


Case

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$250.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00
$3,250.00

Hours Billed Criminal


Appeal

$125.00

$500.00
$500.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$375.00
$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$750.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator Specter General Hours Civil Litigation Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Billed

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

04/05/2007 - ORDER MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS


DENIED AS MOOT. ON NOVEMBER 16, 2006, THE
COURT DISMISSED THE CASE FOR FAILURE TO
Civil Litigation Hours
STATE A CLAIM PURUSUANT TO 28
Billed
04/13/2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288,
Civil Litigation Hours
PAPER NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
Billed
04/23/2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 04/16/07.04/16/07
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED
04/26/2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 04/25/07.
05/05/2007 - ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE., PRO SE.(ac,) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
Federal False Claims Act

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page88
9 of 44
190

$250.00
$3,875.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 86
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description

October 18, 2006 - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in


Caterbone v. Wenger et forma pauperis filed by STANLEY J.
6/1/2007 al
CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks,) (Entered: 10/19/2006)
October 18, 2006 - Filed Civil Action re Obstruction of
Justice and RICO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER THAT MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF
SHALL AMEND HIS COMPLAINT SO AS TO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THE
CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS" ACTION CLOSED FOR
STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE
November 17, 2006 - Complaint against
DEFENDANTS MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR, DENISE
COMMINS, RICHARD H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN,
WILLIAM G. REUTER, MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD
January 19,2007 - ORDER THAT THE ABOVECAPTIONED CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY
A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/19/07. 1/19/07 ENTER
April 3, 2007 - ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT filed by
STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert, of Service. (PRO SE)
(pr, ) (Entered: 04/03/2007)
April 13, 2007 - STANLY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE (#50 in 06-cv-4154).(fdc)
(Entered: 04/13/2007)
April 16, 2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL
REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPSENSE UNTIL 6/19/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLA
April 26, 2007 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
4/25/07. 4/26/07 ENTERED AND COPIES
May 7, 2007 - Addendum to Complaint by STANLY J.
CATERBONE (#1 1 in 06-CV-4154). (fdc) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
June 18, 2007 - Motion For Continuance
June 25, 2007 - Motion For Continuance Granted,
Provide Status by August 31, 2007
Caterbone v. Wenger et al
Appeal Order Amend
2288 Compl

Chapter 11 PP&L
Dismissal Appe

September 6, 2007 - CIVIL CASE DOCKETED Notice


filed by Stanley J. Caterbone. RECORD, received, (clc
September 8, 2007 - LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT
advising appeal has been listed for possible dismissal,
(zm)
September 18, 2007 - APPEARANCE from Attorney
Christopher S. Underhill on behalf of Appellee
Manheim Twp Pol, filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007 - APPEARANCE from Attorney
Stephanie Carfley on behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank,
filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007 - DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank, filed, (clc)
September 19, 2006 - FOLLOW UP LETTER to Robert
W. Hallinger, Walter H. Swayze, Patricia Baxter,
George M. Gowen and Stuart A. Weiss requesting the
following do
September 25, 2006 - APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of Appellee Avalon Pol
Dept, filed. (Iwc)
September 25, 2006 - APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of Appellee Avalon Pol
Dept, filed. (Iwc)
September 29, 2006 - DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Comm Natl Bank, filed, (clc)
October 2, 2006 - APPEARANCE from Attorney Robert
W. Hallinger on behalf of Appellee Lancaster Cty
Prison, filed, (clc)
October 11, 2006 - RESPONSE to Legal Division letter
for possible dismissal, on behalf of Appellee Manheim
Twp Pol, filed. Certificate of Service dated 10/6/06
December 1, 2006 - Notice received from district
court that IFF has been granted to Stanley J.
Caterbone . (clc)
April 30, 2007 - Document filed by Appellant titled
"Addendum to Appeal, filed, (clc)
Appeal Order Amend 2288 Compl
September 1, 2007 - Notice of Appeal to U.S. District
Court Anita Brody
September 10, 2007 - Judge Fehling Memorandum
and Opinion Filed
November 27, 2007 - PP&L Motion To Dismiss to
Judge Anita Brody
May 31, 2007 - Judge Anita Brody Reply Letter to M
Henry PP&L Attorney
May 31, 2007 - Appellant Response to Appellee
Motion to Dismiss
June 18, 2007 - Judge Anita Brody ORDER Denial,
Move to Dissmiss Appeal File Appeal to Third Circuit
within 60 days

Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$1,000.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$500.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

$250.00
$4,750.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$375.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$250.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals

$375.00
$2,375.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$625.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$750.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Hours

$125.00

$250.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page89
10of
of 190
44

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name
Caterbone v.
Lombardo/Office M

003112143900
Page: 87
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Chapter 11 PP&L Dismissal Appe
May 1, 2007 - File Complaint and In Forma Pauperis
Application

Item Description

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
May 4, 2007 - IFP Denied, Error in Caption
Civil Litigation Hours
May 7, 2007- Refile In Forma Pauperis Application
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
May 9, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis Granted
May 24, 2007 - Entry of Appearence Samuel Cortes of Civil Litigation Hours
Rothschild, LLP for Sam Lombardo
Billed
May 29, 2007 - Entry of Appearence and Answer from Civil Litigation Hours
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
Billed
May 31, 2007 - Preliminary Objections filed by
Civil Litigation Hours
Samuel Cortes for Lombardo
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
June 25, 2007 - File Motion For Continuance
Billed
June 29, 2007 - ORDER by Judge Cullen Denial of
Motion for Continuance Requested to Resubmit with Civil Litigation Hours
Reason
Billed
July 19, 2007 - Request for Interogatories and
Request to Produce Documents Filed by Kirsten
Civil Litigation Hours
Worley for Office Max
Billed
July 24, 2007 - File Answer to Office Max
Civil Litigation Hours
Interrogatories
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Caterbone v. Lombardo/Office M
Caterbone v. U.S.
April 30, 2007 - Bankruptcy Case Docketed. Notice
6/30/2007 Trustee
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
filed by Stanley J. Caterbone. (clc)
May 10, 2007 - MOTION by Appellant to proceed in
forma pauperis, filed, (clc)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
May 10, 2007 - APPEARANCE from Attorney Dave
Adams on behalf of Appellee Kelly B. Stapleton, filed,
(clc)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
May 21, 2007 - MOTION by Appellant for Request for
Recusal of Judge Rendell, filed. Answer due 6/4/07.
Certificate of Service dated 5/18/07. (clc)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
May 29, 2007 - ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to
proceed in forma pauperis by Appellant. The appeal
will be submitted to a panel for determination under
28 U.S.
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
June 8, 2007 - MOTION by Appellee to dismiss
appeal, filed. Answer due 6/25/07. Certificate of
Service dated 6/8/07. (clc)
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
June 19, 2007 - Answer to Motion to Dismiss by
Appellant Stanley J. Caterbone
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
Caterbone v. U.S. Trustee
June 9, 2006 - Notice of Appeal to U.S. District Court Hours Billed For Civil
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal Judge Brody Appeal Fulton Bank Auto -Stay
Appeals
July 17, 2006 - Response to Fulton Bank Answer to
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeal
Appeals
August 5, 2006 - Judge Anity Brody ORDER Appeal
Hours Billed For Civil
Denied
Appeals
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal
April 5, 2007 - Appeal Hearing via Telephone at the
Caterbone v. DPW Food Lancaster County Assistance Office. CASE NO.
Hours Billed For Civil
8/7/2007 Stamps
#360234927-002
Appeals
April 10, 2007 - Prepare supporting documents for
Hours Billed For Civil
appeal.
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
April 9, 2007 - ORDER, Denying Appeal
Appeals
April 26, 2007 - Final Administrative Action Order,
Hours Billed For Civil
DENYING BENEFITS
Appeals
May 9, 2007 - Appeal Hearing and Adjudication via
Telephone held at the Lancaster County Assistance
Hours Billed For Civil
Office.
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
June 11, 2007 - Appeals Final Decision/FAA
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
July 2, 2007 - ORDER Denying Reconsideration
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
July 14, 2007 - Appeal to Commonwealth Court
Hours Billed For Civil
Rosen Appeals for Food Stamp Benefits
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Cooksey Appeals for Food Stamps
Appeals
Caterbone v. DPW Food Stamps
Obstruction of Justice - January 16, 2007 - File Civil Action and In Forma
Civil Litigation Hours
EI
Application Caterbone v. Totaro, et al
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
January 23, 2007 - File Exhibits to Complaint
Billed
January 23, 2007 - Appearence by Stephanie Carfly of Civil Litigation Hours
Barley Snyder, LLP, for Fulton Bank
Billed
January 24, 2007 - ORDER In Forma Pauperis
Civil Litigation Hours
DENIED for Frivilous by Judge Allison
Billed
January 25, 2007 - Notice of Rule 236 Notice sent by Civil Litigation Hours
Prothonetary
Billed
January 29, 2007 - Appeal for Reconsideration to
Civil Litigation Hours
ORDER of January 24, 2007 by Judge Allison
Billed
February 8, 2007 - Preliminary Objections filed by
Stepanie Carfly of Barley Snyder, LLP for Fulton Bank
February 20, 2007 - Brief filed by Stepanie Carfly of
Barley Snyder, LLP for Fulton Bank in support of
Preliminary Objections

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount
$2,375.00

Credit
Amount

$125.00

$1,000.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$125.00
$3,250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$1,000.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$1,000.00

$125.00

$2,500.00

$250.00
$1,875.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$625.00

30

$125.00

$3,750.00

30

$125.00

$3,750.00
$11,250.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page90
11of
of 190
44

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 88
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
February 21, 2007 - Judge Allison ORDER DENIED
Appeal for Reconsideration
February 26, 2007 - Rule 236 Notice from
Prothonatary of ORDER dated January 24, 2007 which
was DENIED.
February 28, 2007 - File ANSWER to Fulton Bank's
Preliminary Objections
March 9, 2007- Filing Fees Remained Unpaid for 10
Days after Rule 236 - Judgement of Non Pros Filed by
Prothonatary
March 12, 2007- Christine Munion, Esq., files Entry of
Appearance for Donald Totaro, Lancaster County
Commissioners, Lancaster County Sheriff, Lancaster
County
March 13, 2007 - Praecipe filed to DEFENDANT
FULTON BANK'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO THE COURT FOR
DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SER

Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$625.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Obstruction of Justice - EI
January 8, 2007 - (Emergency) for emergency food
stamp benefits and other benefits filed by stanley j.
8/9/2007 Emergency Food Stamps Caterbone, plaintiff, pro se. And affidavit of financial
January 9, 2007 - Filed: and now, jan 8, 2007, upon
consideration of defendant's request to proceed in
forma pauperis,it is ordered that such request is
granted
January 16, 2007 - Praecipe for Appearance by Diana
Clark, for the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare
January 29, 2007 - Preliminary Objections Filed by
Diana Clark of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer to Preliminary
Objections

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$625.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed

Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours

May 30, 2007 - Notice of Appearance before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to hear case
Billed
Emergency Food Stamps
January 2, 2007 - To proceed informa pauperis with
affidavit of financial service filed by Caterbone, pro
se. In support of petition to set aside sale
January 2, 2007 - Caption Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
Lancaster County Sheriff Department
January 4, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis GRANTED by
Judge Dennis E. Reinaker
January 5, 2007 - Addition to Compliant (Please Add
To Complaint)
January 31, 2007 - Response Of fulton bank to
stanley j. Caterbone's petition to set aside sale of real
estate. Filed by: shawn m. Long, esq. Certificate of
ser

$250.00
$7,375.00

May 29, 2007 - Notice of Appearance Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge for Food Stamps to Reinaker, Recusal
Billed

Petition To Set Aside


Sale

Credit
Amount

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
March 16, 2007 - Filed Addendum to Defendants List Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
April 24, 2007 - Addendum to Complaint filed
Billed
May 11, 2007 - Judgement-Non Pros filed by Chrisine
Munion for Totaro as directed by Wenger,
Civil Litigation Hours
Prothonotary
Billed
May 24, 2007 - Notice of Appeal to Superior Court of Hours Billed For Civil
the Judgement of Non Pros
Appeals
June 6, 2007 - Notice of Concise Statement of
Matters Complained by June 21, 2007 by Judge
Hours Billed For Civil
Allison
Appeals
June 21, 2007 - Statement of Matters Complained
Hours Billed For Civil
filed
Appeals
July 2, 2007 - Response by Fulton Bank on Statement Hours Billed For Civil
of Matters Complained
Appeals
July 16, 2007 - OPINION filed by Judge Paul K. Allison Hours Billed For Civil
to Superior Court
Appeals
July 17, 2007 - Record Sent to Superior Court by
Lancaster County Prothonatary 950 MDA 951 MDA
July 18, 2007 - ORDER from Superior Court DISMISS
950 & 951
July 24, 2007 - Record Returned from the Superior
Court 950 & 951 Memorandum Filed

Qty

Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed

Hours

$250.00
$2,500.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

January 31, 2007 - Notice of Meeting Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge Michael Georgelis filed by Shawn Long
Billed

$125.00

$375.00

February 1, 2007 - Meeting before Judge Georgelis


and ORDER TO DISMISS PETITION DENIED

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$625.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$500.00

Hours
Hours
Hours

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
February 6, 2007 - Reply to Response of Fulton Bank Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
February 6, 2007 - Notice of DENIAL to all parties
Billed
February 20, 2007 - From james d. Mccullough,
deputy prothonotary, superior court of pennsylvania.
Returned herein is the notice of appeal received in the Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
proth

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page91
12of
of 190
44

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

Fulton v. Caterbone
Foreclosur

003112143900
Page: 89
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description

Item Description
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Petition To Set Aside Sale


March 8, 2006 - In mortgage foreclosure filed by
shawn m long esq(ma). The mortgage was recordedin
the office of the recorder of deeds of and for lancaster Civil Litigation Hours
coun
Billed
April 11, 2006 - Complaint. Filed by shawn m. Long,
esq. Reinstated as 1.directed by randall o. Wenger,
prothonotary. (2 copies to atty, 1 copy of complaint
Civil Litigation Hours
wit
Billed
May 1, 2006 - Complaint Served, Civil action
complaint upon stanley caterbone by personal service
Civil Litigation Hours
at lancaster county sheriff's office,50 north duke
Billed
street, lan
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
May 8, 2006 - Answer to Complaint filed
In support of plaintiff's
motion for judgment on
the pleadings. Filed by
shawn m. Long, esq.
Certificate of service of
June 6, 2006 - Brief
same.
June 6, 2006 - Motion by Fulton for judgement on the Civil Litigation Hours
pleadings filed by Shawn M. Long
Billed
June 28, 2006 - Praecipe filed to assign Plaintiff fulton
bank's motion for summary judgment to the court for Civil Litigation Hours
disposition as unopossed with certific
Billed
June 29, 2006 - ORDER Filed: and now, this 29th day
of june, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion
for judgment on the pleadings, as well as defendants
July 20, 2006 - Enter judgment on behalf of plaintiff
and against defendant, stanley j. Caterbone in the
amount of $97,425.07, plus continuing interest after
ma
July 25, 2006 - Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior
Court Case No.
July 28, 2006 - A hearing on the defendant's
application for in forma pauperis status will be held in
curtroom 5 at 9:00 a.m. on wednesday, august 9,
2006. By t
July 31, 2006 - Filed. Writ issued. Affidavit of nonmilitary service. Principal: $88,568.53; interest to
03/02/2006 at a rate of $14.56 per diem: $4,442.96;
ne

July 31, 2006 - Affidavit - rule 3129

July 31, 2006 - Notice of


August 1, 2006 - 220 stone hill road, a/k/a lot #5
stone hill rd., conestoga, conestoga township 56
December 20, 2006. Received check from barley
snyder i

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

$125.00

$250.00
$3,875.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$625.00

Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00
2

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed
2
$125.00
7/31/2006 Concerning
the real property located
at 220 stone hill road
a/k/a lot #5 stone hill
road, township of
conestog
Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00
7/31/2006 Sheriff's sale
of real property to
stanley j. Caterbone at
220 stone hill road,
conestoga, pa 17516.
Filed by shawn m. Long

Credit
Amount

$250.00

Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$125.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

$250.00

August 11, 2006 - Filed. The defendant has appealed


my june 29, 2006 order granting the plaintiff's motion Civil Litigation Hours
for judgment on the pleadings. He is directed to file
Billed

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$125.00

$125.00

August 8, 2006 - Served Def. Stanley j. Caterbone,


personally, with a notice of sale and/or handbill at
lancaster county courthouse, 50 north duke st
August 11, 2006 - In Forma Pauperis With praecipe to
proceed in forma pauperis presented to court and
court enters order granting in forma pauperis status.
Mich

August 17, 2006 - Of notice of sheriff's sale by mail to


lienholders on aug. 11, 2006. Filed by shawn m.
Civil Litigation
Long, esq. Of the notice of sheriff sale upon defenda Billed
Civil Litigation
August 31, 2006 - Served Writ of Execution
Billed
September 5, 2006-OPINION Pursuant to pa.r.a.p.
1025(a) filed. By the court: michael a. Georgelis,
judge. Copies w/236 notice sent to: stanley j.
Civil Litigation
Caterbone, pro
Billed
September 6, 2006-The superior court of
pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda 2006. Copy of the list of
record documents sent to: stanley j. Caterbone, pro Civil Litigation
se and shawn m
Billed

Caterbone v. Lanc Co
3/1/2007 Prison et

Qty

Hours
Hours

Hours

Hours

January 8, 2006-Certified copy of Order from the


superior court of pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda 2006 Civil Litigation Hours
filed. And now, this fourth day of january, 2007
Billed
Fulton v. Caterbone Foreclosur
Jan 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page92
13of
of 190
44

$500.00
$5,375.00

120

$75.00

$9,000.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 90
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Feb 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Apr 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
May 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data

Item Description

6/17/2007

Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to Fulton Bank's motion to


establish deadline for plff to file amended complaint in
accordance with the Court's order of 6/19/06,
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et
Sept 6, 2006 Notice of Appeal Third Circuit Court of
Appeals Case No. 06-3955 Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Civil Appeal Case
Sept 8, 2006 Letter from Third Circuit Legal Division
re Jurisdictional Dismissal
Sept 18 2006 Research and Analysis Notice of
Appearences Fultong Bank, Manheim Twp Police;
Fulton Bank Disclosure Statement
Sept 25 2006 Notice of Appearence Avalon Police
Dept
Sept 25 2006 Notice of Appearance Mellon Bank;
Disclosure Statement
Sept 28 2006 Reponse to Legal Division by Fulton
Bank in support of dismissal
Oct 2 2006 Notice of Appearance Lancaster County
Prison
Oct 11 2006 Reponse to Legal Division by Manheim
Twp Police Chris Underhill in support of dismissal

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

Credit
Amount

Research Hours Billed

120

$75.00

$9,000.00

Research Hours Billed

120

$75.00

$9,000.00

Research Hours Billed

120

$75.00

$9,000.00

Research Hours Billed

60

$75.00

$4,500.00

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

30

$125.00

$3,750.00

Research Hours Billed

30

$75.00

$2,250.00

Court Time Hours Billed

30

$150.00

$4,500.00

Research Hours Billed

30

$75.00

$2,250.00

$125.00

$625.00

Research Hours Billed

30

$75.00

$2,250.00

Research Hours Billed

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

Research Hours Billed

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

Research Hours Billed

20

$75.00

$1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

15

$125.00

$1,875.00

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$125.00

May 2005 General Hours Billed For May 16 2005 Legal


Work Done On Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, Civil Litigation Hours
et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
Jun 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Jul 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Aug 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Sep 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Oct 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Nov 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Dec 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Research Hours Billed
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed For Jan 23 2006 Legal
Work Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al 052288 Case Served Defendants per Judge Mclaughlin
Feb 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Apr 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
May 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Jun 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte Meeting w/Judge
McLaughlin Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et
al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton Bank's response to plff's
motion for ex parte meeting with Honorable Mary A.
McLaughlin,
Jul 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Aug 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data

Qty

Civil Litigation Hours


Billed

$625.00
$77,375.00

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals

For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil

Hours Billed For Civil


Appeals

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page93
14of
of 190
44

10

$125.00

$1,250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

$125.00

$250.00

$125.00

$375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
Stan J. Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case
Date

Name

003112143900
Page: 91
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
Advanced Media Group Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007

Line Description
Dec 1 2006 In Forrma Pauperis Application Granted
Apr 30 2007 Addendum to Appeal filed; Letter to
McLaughlin, DARPA, Parula Property Stolen
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et

Item Description
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals

Qty

Unit
Price

Debit
Amount

$125.00

$125.00

Credit
Amount
$375.00
$625.00

$4,500.00

Total Amount Billed


To Date

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page94
15of
of 190
44

$284,702.50

$283,952.50

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.15
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
92Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 1a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

3/1/07

7001

05-2288

Line Description

Item Description

Jan 2005 Research Billed for


Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Feb 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Apr 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
May 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
May 2005 General Hours Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
For May 16 2005 Legal Work
Done On Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District
Court 05-2288 Pro Se Civil Case
Jun 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Jul 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Aug 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Sep 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Oct 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Nov 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Dec 2005 Research Billed for
Research Hours Billed
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
For Jan 23 2006 Legal Work
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al 05-2288 Case
Served Defendants per Judge
Mclaughlin
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page95
16of
of 190
44

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

120.00

75.00

9,000.00

120.00

75.00

9,000.00

120.00

75.00

9,000.00

120.00

75.00

9,000.00

60.00

75.00

4,500.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

30.00

125.00

3,750.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.26
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
93Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 2a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

3/1/07

Invoice

7002

Customer ID

05-23059

Line Description

Item Description

Feb 2006 Research Billed for


Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Apr 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Apr 10 2006 Motion for
Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al
from Lancaster General Hopital
to Judge McLaughlin Granted
May 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Jun 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte
Meeting w/Judge McLaughlin
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton
Bank's response to plff's motion
for ex parte meeting with
Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin,
Jul 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Aug 2006 Research Billed for
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to
Fulton Bank's motion to establish
deadline for plff to file amended
complaint in accordance with the
Court's order of 6/19/06,
Apr 10 2006 Motion for
Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al
from Lancaster General Hopital
to Judge McLaughlin Granted
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et

Research Hours Billed

30.00

75.00

2,250.00

Court Time Hours Bill

30.00

150.00

4,500.00

Research Hours Billed

30.00

75.00

2,250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Research Hours Billed

30.00

75.00

2,250.00

Research Hours Billed

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Research Hours Billed

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

Research Hours Billed

20.00

75.00

1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

15.00

125.00

1,875.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

May 2005 Research Filing of


Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Petition for Bankruptcy, Russell
Kraft, Nettleton & Fenefrock
May 23 2005 File for Chapter 11 Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Bankruptcy Protection in Federal
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
Regarding 6/13/2005
Order
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
96
17of
of 190
44
Dismissing Case for Debtor's

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

77,375.00
20.00

125.00

2,500.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.26
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
94Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 3a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Dismissing Case for Debtor's


Failure to Timely File Required
Documents to
Jun 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal,
and Findings of Fact Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: #
Jul 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Aug 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Sep 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Oct 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Nov 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Dec 2005 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules Chapter 11 Hours Bill
F & G Filed by Amended Matrix
Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt
Number 20074028, Fee Amount
$26.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered:
12/16/2005)
Jan 2006 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Feb 2006 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Apr 2006 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
May 2006 Administration,
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jun 2006 Administration,
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page97
18of
of 190
44Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reporting and Communication

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

10.00

125.00 November
1,250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.32
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
95Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 4a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE:
Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
Filed by United States Trustee (
Jul 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Aug 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Sep 2006 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jan 2007 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

3/16/07

3/16/07

06-cv-5138

1462-MDA-2006

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Court Time Hours Bill

7.00

150.00

1,050.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

25,800.00

Nov 20, 2006 - General Hours


Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Harbeas Corpus filed from
Lancaster County Prison on
November 17, 2006
January 19, 2007 - ADDENDUM
to 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition
by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service, (gs)
(Entered: 01/22/2007)
April 17, 2007 - ORDER THAT
THE CLERK SHALL
PROMPTLY FURNISH
PETITIONER WITH THE IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION FORM AND
PETITIONER SHALL EITHER
COMPLETE AND RET
May 31, 2007 - EXHIBIT to 28
U.S.C. Section 2241 Habeas
Corpus Petition by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE. Certificate of
Service (gs) (Entered:
06/01/2007)
June 4, 2007 - EXHIBIT to
U.S.C. Sec. 2241 Habeas Copus
Petition by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE. (gs) (Entered:
06/04/2007)
Federal Habeau Corpus

Hours Billed For Civil

15.00

125.00

1,875.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Aug 2006 General Hours Billed


For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Penn DOT

Civil Litigation Hours

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

3,000.00

3/16/07
CI-06-07376
Aug 2 2006 General
Hours
Billed
DRAFT-PETITION
Advanced
Media Group
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
98
19
of
of 190
44Civil Litigation Hours
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se

2,250.00
10.00

125.00 November
1,250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.37
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
96Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 5a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Filed Complaint
Aug 24 2006 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Filed Default
Notice
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael

3/16/07

3/16/07

3/16/07

CI-06-06658

CI-06-07188

CI-06-03401

Item Description

Qty

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

Unit Price Debit Amnt

125.00

Credit Amn

250.00

1,500.00

Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed


For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Filed Complaint & In
Forma Pauperis Denied by
Georgelis
Aug 25 General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Refiled In Forma
Pauperis Granted by Cullen
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case Filed Appeal
to Superior Court of
Pennsylvania
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Appeal Case Transfered from
Superior Court to Commonwealth
Court of Common Pleas
Caterbone v. Penn DOT

Civil Litigation Hours

15.00

125.00

1,875.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed


For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Filed Complaint with
Advanced Media Group
10 Aug 2006 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Chapter 11 Case
Transfered to Chapter 11 Case by
PP&L
Caterbone v. PP&L Electric

Civil Litigation Hours

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

125.00

3,750.00

Feb 2005 General Hours Billed


Civil Litigation Hours
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Meetings &
Communications with Chief of
Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed
Civil Litigation Hours
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Meetings &
Communications with Chief of
Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed Civil Litigation Hours
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Prepared Complaint
and Email to Don Totaro,
Lancaster County DA
Apr 11 2006 General Hours
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Filed
Complaint
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint Civil Litigation Hours
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
May 15 2006 General Hours
Civil Litigation Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Certificate of
Service Personal Delivery to
William Cambell of Quarryville
Jun 10 2006 Motion for
Civil Litigation Hours
Continuance General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil CasePage
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page99
20of
of 190
44

1,125.00
15.00

125.00

1,875.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

20.00

125.00

2,500.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.42
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
97Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 6a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

3/16/07

3/16/07

Invoice

Customer ID

CI-06-08490

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to


Preliminary Objections General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior
Court of Pennsylvania General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal
Case
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Time For
Court Appearance and Litigation
Shawn Long Appeared at
Defendants Table before Court,
walked out
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended
Complaint from Bausman Post
Office, General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed for
Continuance from Lancaster
County Prison General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Southern Regional

Civil Litigation Hours

12.00

125.00

1,500.00

Hours Billed For Civil

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Court Time Hours Bill

4.00

150.00

600.00

Hours Billed For Civil

12.00

125.00

1,500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In


Forma Pauperis Filed General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP
Granted Judge Ashworth
Mar 26 2007 File Response to
Preliminary Objections to
Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli

Civil Litigation Hours

15.00

125.00

1,875.00

Civil Litigation Hours

20.00

125.00

2,500.00

12,100.00

4,375.00

Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint &


Civil Litigation Hours
In Forma Pauperis General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by
Judge Reinaker
Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma
Civil Litigation Hours
Pauperis Application Filed &
Approved by Judge Joseph
Madenspacher
Caterbone v. Benjamin Roda

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

Aug 1 2006 Complaint &


Civil Litigation Hours
Informa Pauperis Filed with
Advanced Media Group General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Case, IFP Granted by Georgeli
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of Civil Litigation Hours
Default Filed - General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to
Civil Litigation Hours
Preliminary Objections - General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of
Civil Litigation Hours
Arbitration - General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60
Civil Litigation Hours
Day Continuance
- General
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
100
21 of 44
190
Hours Billed For Legal Work

20.00

125.00

2,500.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

7.00

125.00

875.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

125.00

250.00

3/16/07

CI-06-08742

Line Description

CI-06-07330

1,500.00

2.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.42
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
98Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 7a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Hours Billed For Legal Work


Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended
Civil Litigation Hours
Complaint - General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Harleysville et
3/16/07

3/16/07

3/16/07

3/17/07

3/17/07

3/18/07

CI-05-03403

CI-06-03349

CI-06-04939

TR-0003557-2006

TR-0004428-2006

CP-36-SA0000141-2005

Qty

7.00

Unit Price Debit Amnt

125.00

Credit Amn

875.00

5,500.00

Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint Civil Litigation Hours


General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Jun 6 2006 Filed Important
Civil Litigation Hours
Notice of Default - General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Grassell, Thomas

15.00

125.00

1,875.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint,


Civil Litigation Hours
walked to Courthouse directly
after discharge from Hospital General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended
Civil Litigation Hours
Complaint - General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Lancaster General

25.00

125.00

3,125.00

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & Civil Litigation Hours


In Forma Pauperis Application General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Caterbone v. Pflumm,Mike et al

8.00

2006 General Hours Billed For


Hours Billed For Crim
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Downtown
Lancaster Parking Meter
Violation MDJ Simms
2006 Time For Court Appearance Court Time Hours Bill
and Litigation For Parking Meter
Violation
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone

5.00

125.00

625.00

3.00

150.00

450.00

Aug 2006 General Hours Billed


For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Downtown
Lancaster Parking Meter
Violation MDJ Simms
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation MDJ
Simms Parking Meter Violation
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone

Hours Billed For Crim

5.00

125.00

625.00

Court Time Hours Bill

3.00

150.00

450.00

May 10 2005 General Hours


Hours Billed For Crim
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
18$2709$$A3 Harassment w/Tim
Decker Killing of Cat SRPD
Humane Legue Witness
Sep 28 2005 General Hours
Hours Billed Criminal
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Notice of Appeal Stolen From
Mail, Never Appeared For Trial,
Judge Allison
Fines $442.00 Paid General
Hours Billed Criminal
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page101
22 of 44
190

2,375.00

4,125.00
125.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

1,075.00

1,075.00
10.00

125.00

1,250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
Document:
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.59
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
99Circuit
Date
Filed:
12/02/2015
Page: 8a
Third
Court
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/18/07

3/18/07

CP-36-MD0000010-2007

CP-36-CR0003179-2006

Jan 09 2007 General Hours


Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Filed Nunc Pro Tunc, Denied by
Reainaker
Jan 19 2007 General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Refiled, Denied Again
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone

Credit Amn

1,875.00
Hours Billed Criminal

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed Criminal

2.00

125.00

250.00

Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing


Hours Billed For Crim
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case MDJ Hamilton, Fire M.
Bomberger, Public Defender,
MDJ Hamilton Guilty
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Case Continued Judge Allison
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case $75$3733$$A M2
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Case Continued Judge Allison
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case From Lanc Co Prison
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Continued Judge Ashworth
(Cullen) General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case From Lanc Co
Prison
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Scheduled for Trial Judge Farina
(Cullen) General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Janice Longer
Appo
Time For Court Appearance and Court Time Hours Bill
Litigation
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to
Hours Billed For Crim
Lancaster County Bar v. Janice
Longer General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List
Court Time Hours Bill
Scheduled for Trial General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to
Hours Billed For Crim
Longer Petition to Withdraw
From Case General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed Hours Billed For Crim
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Meeting with
Janice Longer To Prepare
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge
Hours Billed For Crim
Cullen Continued Case to April
Court ScheduleTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court
Hours Billed For Crim
Diciplinary Complaint v. Janice
Longer General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Mar 22 2007 Research
&102
Review
Hours Billed For Crim
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
23 of 44
190
Pa Consolodated Statutes

500.00
12.00

125.00

1,500.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

6.00

125.00

750.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

3.00

125.00 November
375.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.64
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
100
12/02/2015
Page: 9a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Pa Consolodated Statutes
Annotated at Law Library
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Hours Billed For Crim
Review Motion to Dismiss
QuashGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Court Time Hours Bill
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/18/07

CP-36-CR0002843-2006

Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Hours Billed For Crim


Judge Reuter, Bezzard had to
Refile or Dismiss General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case East
Lampeter Twp
May 18 2006 Lancaster County
Hours Billed For Crim
DA Office Refile Charges
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case 4 Charges-Harras Dis
Ord,Theft,Harrasment
Time For Court Appearance and Court Time Hours Bill
Litigation
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt
Hours Billed For Crim
Bomberger, Public Defender
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Court Time Hours Bill
Lanaster County Court of
Common PleasTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma
Hours Billed For Crim
Pauperis Granted General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of
Hours Billed For Crim
Particulars Discovery General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Judge AllisonTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Judge Farina Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial
Court Time Hours Bill
List Judge FarinaTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation From
Lancaster County Prison
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed Research Hours Billed
For Case From Lancaster County
Prison Law Library
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina
Court Time Hours Bill
Sent to 1250 Fremont & 220
Stone Hill Rd to get files Time
For Court Appearance and
Litigation Dismiss Harassment,
Change to Summa
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Court Time Hours Bill
Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harrasment & Disorderly
Conduct, Not Guilty Thef of
Service
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals &
Hours Billed Criminal
Motions General Hours Billed
For Legal WorkPage
Done
On
Pro of
Se 44
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
103
24
190
Criminal Appeal Case From

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

2.00

125.00

0.10

150.00

Credit Amn

250.00

15.00
8,990.00

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

10.00

150.00

1,500.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

4.00

150.00

600.00

5.00

150.00

750.00

5.00

150.00

750.00

7.00

75.00

525.00

7.00

150.00

1,050.00

5.00

150.00

750.00

6.00

125.00

750.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.75
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
101
12/02/2015
Page: 10a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
Criminal Appeal Case From
Lancaster County Prison
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to
Superior Court Case No. MDA
125 General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court
Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript
& ReGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections
Office for Payment of Fines and
Costs and Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections to
Have Payment Due Removed
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone

3/18/07

3/18/07

CP-36-SA0000028-2007

CP-36-SA0000028-2007

Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office


Correspondence & Complaint to
SRPDTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to
MDJ Eckert Picked Up by
Constables General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus
to U.S. District Court of Eastern
District of PA General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Lanc Pri
Dec 2006 Research Billed For
Case From Lancaster County
Prison Law Library
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of
Mandamus From Lancaster
County PrisonGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for
Continuance/Change Venue
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case Moved From Eckert to
Stotlzfus
Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ
StoltzfusTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harr, Dis Con, Obs, Dismiss
DUSus Fin Responsi Fine $954
Joe Caterbone
Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo
Appeal to Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Hours Billed Criminal

4.00

125.00

500.00

Hours Billed Criminal

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed Criminal

4.00

125.00

500.00

Hours Billed Criminal

2.00

125.00

250.00

11,650.00
Court Time Hours Bill

10.00

150.00

1,500.00

Hours Billed For Crim

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed Criminal

7.00

125.00

875.00

Research Hours Billed

5.00

75.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Crim

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Hours Billed For Crim

3.00

125.00

375.00

Court Time Hours Bill

6.00

150.00

900.00

Hours Billed Criminal

5.00

125.00

625.00

Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ


Hours Billed For Crim
Commins Robert M. Fedor
General Hours Billed
For
Legal
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
104
25
of 44
190
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal

6,275.00
5.00

125.00

625.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.86
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
102
12/02/2015
Page: 11a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Work Done On Pro Se Criminal


Case 2 Girls Walking Guilty Fine
$315.66
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal
Hours Billed Criminal
Trial Judge Perezous Found
Guilty ?? April 2 Day of Daylight
Person Broke Into 220 Stone Hill
Road, Mike on Cell Phone,
Kennet SPoli
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
3/18/07

3/18/07

CP-36-CR0000160-2006

CP-36-MD0000006-2007

Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ


Hamilton General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Fines $367.50
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary
Appeal to Court of Common
PleasGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for
Continuance From Lancaster
County PrisonJudge Cullen
Denied General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Dec 2006 Lancaster County
Prison Law Library Research
Billed For Case
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous
Granted Motion For Continuance
Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Dec 22 2006 Motion for
Transcripts Filed from Lancaster
County Prison General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For
Continuance Granted Judge
Perezous General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Qty

3.00

Unit Price Debit Amnt

125.00

Credit Amn

375.00

1,000.00

Hours Billed For Crim

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Hours Billed Criminal

4.00

125.00

500.00

Hours Billed Criminal

3.00

125.00

375.00

Research Hours Billed

5.00

75.00

375.00

Court Time Hours Bill

4.00

150.00

600.00

Hours Billed Criminal

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed Criminal

4.00

125.00

500.00

Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of


Hours Billed For Crim
Mandamus v. MDJ Eckert From
Lancaster County Prison General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of
Hours Billed For Crim
Mandamus v. MDJ Commins
From Lancaster County Prison
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for
Hours Billed For Crim
Change of Venue Deinied Judge
Reinaker General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Jan 11 2007 Motion for
Hours Billed For Crim
Continance Filed Denied Judge
Reinaker General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Jan 17 2007 Motion for
Hours Billed For Crim
Reconsideration Filed Denied
Judge Reinaker General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se CriminalPage
Case
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page105
26 of 44
190

3,600.00
6.00

125.00

750.00

6.00

125.00

750.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:50.97
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
103
12/02/2015
Page: 12a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Common of PA v S. Caterbone
3/18/07

3/20/07

3/20/07

3/20/07

3/20/07

3/20/07

3/20/07

CP-36-CR0000055-2006

CP-36-CR0000051-2007

CP-36-CR0000012-2007

CP-36-CR0000011-2007

CP-36-CR0000010-2007

CP-36-CR0000011-2007

05-3689

Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to


Proceed In Forma Pauperis
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Credit Amn

2,875.00
Hours Billed For Crim

2.00

125.00

250.00

250.00

Jan 12 2007 File Change of


Hours Billed Criminal
Venue/ Continuance MDEckert
Citations Denied by Judge Cullen
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

4.00

Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to


File Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Hours Billed Criminal

4.00

Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to


File Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Hours Billed Criminal

Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to


File Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Hours Billed Criminal

Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to


File In Forma Pauperis for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Hours Billed Criminal

125.00

500.00

500.00
125.00

500.00

500.00
4.00

125.00

500.00

500.00
4.00

125.00

500.00

500.00

July 15, 2005 - Certificate of


Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Appeal of STANLEY
CATERBONE from the order of
Bankruptcy Judge Thomas M.
Twardowski. (tj, ) (Entered:
07/18/2005)
July 15, 2005 - Briefing Schedule Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
7/18/05 Entered and copies
mailed, (tj, ) (Entered:
07/18/2005)
July 28, 2005 - BRIEF TO
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
ORDER TO DISMISS ON
6/13/05 by STANLEY
CATERBONE. (ami, ) (Entered:
07/29/2005)
September 23, 2005 - ORDER
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
TO SHOW CAUSE BY
OCTOBER 3, 2005, WHY IN
LIGHT OF
DEBTOR-APPELLANT'S
NOTICE OF APPEAL (BKY.
DOCKET #12) AND BRIEF
(DOCKET #3), THIS C
October 3, 2005 - RESPONSE
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
TO THE ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE
DEBTOR'S
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
106
27 of 44
190
BANKRUPTCY CASE

2.00

125.00

250.00

250.00
4.00

125.00

500.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.03
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
104
12/02/2015
Page: 13a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

BANKRUPTCY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE
REINSTATED by UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
October 6, 2005 - ORDER THAT Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
THIS CASE IS REINSTATED
IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT
DEBTOR- APPELLANT
COMPLY WITH THE RULES
November 7, 2005 - Original
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Bankruptcy Record returned to
the Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
(afm, ) (Entered: 1 1/08/2005)
November 14, 2005 - Letter from Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
re: received original record on
11/10/05. (afm, ) (Entered:
11/14/2005)
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
3/20/07

3/20/07

06-1538

06-4154

May 15 2006 File Appeal to


Automatic Stay Order of Judge
Fehling to Judge Anita Brody
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal

Hours Billed Criminal

Sept 18, 2006 - Certificate of


Hours Billed For Civil
Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP from the order
of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E.
Fehling. (tj,) (Entered: 09/18
October 10, 2007 - Certificate of Hours Billed For Civil
Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP from the order
of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E.
Fehling. (tj,) (Entered: 09
October 17, 2007 - Brief in
Hours Billed For Civil
Opposition re 3 Appellant's Brief
by PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
(HENRY, MICHAEL) Modified
on 10/18/2006 (np). (Entered:
10/17/2006)
November 15, 2007 - MOTION
Hours Billed For Civil
FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.(gs) Additional
attachment(s) added on
12/13/2006 (mo,). (Entered:
11/16/2006) fro
General Hours Billed For Legal
Hours Billed For Civil
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Appeal Case
February 7, 2007 - MOTION
Hours Billed For Civil
FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
02/09/2007)
February 21, 2007 - ORDER that Hours Billed For Civil
APPELLANT STANLEY J.
CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR
A CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. APPELLANT
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page107
28MAY
of 44
190
FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN THE

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

3,125.00
20.00

125.00

2,500.00

2,500.00
5.00

125.00

625.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

1.50

125.00

187.50

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.08
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
105
12/02/2015
Page: 14a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN THE
ABOVE-CAPTIONED CAS
April 13, 2007 - MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288, PAPER
NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
04/13/2007)
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Appeal Case

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

Chapter 11 Amend Dismissal


3/22/07

3/22/07

MDA 125-2006

TR-0000085--2006

Jan 4 2007 Filed Notice of


Appeal to Superior Court Filed at
Lancaster County Clerk of
CoGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 11 2007 Filed Motion For
Continuance Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Feb 12 2997 Filed Concise
Statement of Matters
Complainted on Appeal General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with
Lancaster County Clerk of Courts
Review & Correct Index of
RecorGeneral Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Credit Amn

375.00
3,312.50

Hours Billed Criminal

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed Criminal

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed Criminal

12.00

125.00

1,500.00

Hours Billed Criminal

3.00

125.00

375.00

Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation Hours Billed For Crim


General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S
Court Time Hours Bill
28th St. Harrisburg Guilty MDJ
Smith Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter Hours Billed For Crim
For Payment of Fine & Costs
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith
Hours Billed Criminal
Re Payment of Fines General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application
Hours Billed Criminal
For Leave Nunc Pro TuncGeneral
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma
Hours Billed Criminal
Pauperis In Dauphin County
Court of Common Pleas Granted
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal to Superior Court in
Dauphin CountyPage
Court
MDA
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
108
29 of 44
190
435-2007 General Hours Billed

2,625.00
4.00

125.00

500.00

5.00

150.00

750.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.14
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
106
12/02/2015
Page: 15a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

435-2007 General Hours Billed


For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
3/22/07

3/28/07

3/28/07

MDA 435-2007

248 MAL 2007

06-cv-4734

Credit Amn

3,250.00

Mar 25 2007 Filed Docketing


Statement to Superior Court of
Pennsylvania General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Common of PA v S. Caterbone

Hours Billed Criminal

Mar 27 2007 File Response to


Fulton Bank Motion to Dismiss
Case General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case
Fulton Bank v Caterbone, Stan

Hours Billed For Civil

4.00

125.00

500.00

500.00

110/20/2006 - File Federal False Civil Litigation Hours


Claims Act, No Complaint Copy
Satute FMG, AMG, Global,
Radio Science Laboratories,
Power Productions v. ISC,
Attorney General,
11/16/2006 - MOTION for Leave Civil Litigation Hours
to Proceed in forma pauperis filed
by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.(tj, ) (Entered:
10/23/2006)
11/16/2006 - ORDER THAT
Civil Litigation Hours
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED THAT THIS CASE
IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO S
COMPLAINT AGAINST
Civil Litigation Hours
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL, PLC FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE, ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, LTD., ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP,
02/07/2007 - MOTION FOR
Civil Litigation Hours
CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
02/09/2007)
Mar 16 2007 Letter to U.S.
Civil Litigation Hours
Senator Arlen Specter Regarding
Obstruciton of Justice General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 12 2007 Meet Lisa Owings
Civil Litigation Hours
staffer on Judiciary Comitte from
Senator Specter at Chamber
Building General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Mar 13 2007 Letter to Lisa
Civil Litigation Hours
Owings of Senator Specter Office
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Mar 19 2007 Letter to Lisa
Civil Litigation Hours
Owings of Senator Specter Office
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro
Se Civil
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
109
30Case
of 44
190

3.00

125.00

375.00

375.00
6.00

125.00

750.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.25
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
107
12/02/2015
Page: 16a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

6/1/07

Invoice

Customer ID

06-4650

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Mar 20 2007 Letter to Lisa


Owings of Senator Specter Office
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
03/23/2007 - ORDER THAT
THE PLAINTIFF SHALL
SUBMIT A COPY OF HIS
MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE BY 4/6/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/22/07.
3/23/07 ENTERE
Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator
Specter General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
04/05/2007 - ORDER MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS
DENIED AS MOOT. ON
NOVEMBER 16, 2006, THE
COURT DISMISSED THE
CASE FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
PURUSUANT TO 28
04/13/2007 - MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288, PAPER
NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
04/23/2007 - ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE IS DENIED
AS MOOT. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON
04/16/07.04/16/07 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED
04/26/2007 - ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR
AN EX PARTE MEETING IS
DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
04/25/07.
05/05/2007 - ADDENDUM TO
COMPLAINT BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE., PRO SE.(ac,)
(Entered: 05/07/2007)
Federal False Claims Act

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

October 18, 2006 - MOTION for Civil Litigation Hours


Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis filed by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks,)
(Entered: 10/19/2006)
October 18, 2006 - Filed Civil
Civil Litigation Hours
Action re Obstruction of Justice
and RICO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER
Civil Litigation Hours
THAT MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED THAT
PLAINTIFF SHALL AMEND
HIS COMPLAINT SO AS TO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER
Civil Litigation Hours
THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. THE CLERK OF
COURT MARK THIS" ACTION
CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL
PURPOSES AND
PLACE
THE
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
110
31
of 44
190

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

3,875.00
3.00

125.00

375.00

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.30
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
108
12/02/2015
Page: 17a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

6/1/07

Invoice

Customer ID

06-3955

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

November 17, 2006 - Complaint


against DEFENDANTS
MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR,
DENISE COMMINS, RICHARD
H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN,
WILLIAM G. REUTER,
MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD
January 19,2007 - ORDER
THAT THE
ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE
SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/19/07.
1/19/07 ENTER
April 3, 2007 - ADDENDUM
TO COMPLAINT filed by
STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert,
of Service. (PRO SE) (pr, )
(Entered: 04/03/2007)
April 13, 2007 - STANLY J.
CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE (#50 in
06-cv-4154).(fdc) (Entered:
04/13/2007)
April 16, 2007 - ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. THIS CASE
SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPSENSE UNTIL 6/19/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLA
April 26, 2007 - ORDER THAT
THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING
IS DENIED. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/25/07.
4/26/07 ENTERED AND
COPIES
May 7, 2007 - Addendum to
Complaint by STANLY J.
CATERBONE (#1 1 in
06-CV-4154). (fdc) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
June 18, 2007 - Motion For
Continuance
June 25, 2007 - Motion For
Continuance Granted, Provide
Status by August 31, 2007
Caterbone v. Wenger et al

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

4.00

125.00

500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

September 6, 2007 - CIVIL


Hours Billed For Civil
CASE DOCKETED Notice filed
by Stanley J. Caterbone.
RECORD, received, (clc
September 8, 2007 - LEGAL
Hours Billed For Civil
DIVISION LETTER SENT
advising appeal has been listed
for possible dismissal, (zm)
September 18, 2007 Hours Billed For Civil
APPEARANCE from Attorney
Christopher S. Underhill on
behalf of Appellee Manheim Twp
Pol, filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007 Hours Billed For Civil
APPEARANCE from Attorney
Stephanie Carfley on behalf of
Appellee Fulton Bank, filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007
- 111
Hours Billed For Civil
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
32 of 44
190
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

4,750.00
3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00 November
125.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.36
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
109
12/02/2015
Page: 18a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank,
filed, (clc)
September 19, 2006 - FOLLOW
UP LETTER to Robert W.
Hallinger, Walter H. Swayze,
Patricia Baxter, George M.
Gowen and Stuart A. Weiss
requesting the following do
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 29, 2006 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Comm Natl
Bank, filed, (clc)
October 2, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
Robert W. Hallinger on behalf of
Appellee Lancaster Cty Prison,
filed, (clc)
October 11, 2006 - RESPONSE
to Legal Division letter for
possible dismissal, on behalf of
Appellee Manheim Twp Pol,
filed. Certificate of Service dated
10/6/06
December 1, 2006 - Notice
received from district court that
IFF has been granted to Stanley J.
Caterbone . (clc)
April 30, 2007 - Document filed
by Appellant titled "Addendum to
Appeal, filed, (clc)
Appeal Order Amend 2288
Compl

6/1/07

6/1/07

06-5117

7003

CI-07-03924

September 1, 2007 - Notice of


Appeal to U.S. District Court
Anita Brody
September 10, 2007 - Judge
Fehling Memorandum and
Opinion Filed
November 27, 2007 - PP&L
Motion To Dismiss to Judge
Anita Brody
May 31, 2007 - Judge Anita
Brody Reply Letter to M Henry
PP&L Attorney
May 31, 2007 - Appellant
Response to Appellee Motion to
Dismiss
June 18, 2007 - Judge Anita
Brody ORDER Denial, Move to
Dissmiss Appeal File Appeal to
Third Circuit within 60 days
Chapter 11 PP&L Dismissal
Appe

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00
2,375.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

5.00

125.00

625.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

6.00

125.00

750.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

2.00

125.00

250.00

May 1, 2007 - File Complaint and Civil Litigation Hours


In Forma Pauperis Application
May 4, 2007 - IFP Denied, Error Civil Litigation Hours
in Caption
May 7, 2007- Refile
In Forma
Civil Litigation Hours
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
112
33 of 44
190
Pauperis Application

2,375.00
8.00

125.00

1,000.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00 November
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.47
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
110
12/02/2015
Page: 19a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
Pauperis Application
May 9, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis
Granted
May 24, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence Samuel Cortes of
Rothschild, LLP for Sam
Lombardo
May 29, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence and Answer from
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
May 31, 2007 - Preliminary
Objections filed by Samuel
Cortes for Lombardo
June 25, 2007 - File Motion For
Continuance
June 29, 2007 - ORDER by
Judge Cullen Denial of Motion
for Continuance Requested to
Resubmit with Reason
July 19, 2007 - Request for
Interogatories and Request to
Produce Documents Filed by
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
July 24, 2007 - File Answer to
Office Max Interrogatories

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

Caterbone v. Lombardo/Office M
6/17/07

6/17/07

05-2288

05-23059

Sept 6, 2006 Notice of Appeal


Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No. 06-3955 Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal
Case
Sept 8, 2006 Letter from Third
Circuit Legal Division re
Jurisdictional Dismissal
Sept 18 2006 Research and
Analysis Notice of Appearences
Fultong Bank, Manheim Twp
Police; Fulton Bank Disclosure
Statement
Sept 25 2006 Notice of
Appearence Avalon Police Dept
Sept 25 2006 Notice of
Appearance Mellon Bank;
Disclosure Statement
Sept 28 2006 Reponse to Legal
Division by Fulton Bank in
support of dismissal
Oct 2 2006 Notice of Appearance
Lancaster County Prison
Oct 11 2006 Reponse to Legal
Division by Manheim Twp Police
Chris Underhill in support of
dismissal
Dec 1 2006 In Forrma Pauperis
Application Granted
Apr 30 2007 Addendum to
Appeal filed; Letter to
McLaughlin, DARPA, Parula
Property Stolen
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et

Credit Amn

125.00
3,250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

10.00

125.00

1,250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Apr 30 2007 Notice of Appeal to Chapter 11 Appeal Ho


Thrid Circuit from Chapter 11 re
Amend Filing Date Case No.
07-2150
May 10 2007 Application to
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
procedd In Forma Pauperis Filed
May 21 2007 Motion For Recusal Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
of Judge RendellPage
Filed
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page113
34 of 44
190

4,500.00
5.00

125.00

625.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.58
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
111
12/02/2015
Page: 20a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

6/17/07

Invoice

Customer ID

05-23059

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

May 29 2007 Order Granted for


In Forma Pauperis; Proceed to 3
Judge Panel for Review to
Continue
June 8 2007 Motion to Dismiss
by Department of Justice
(Appellee) by J. Adams
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

3.00

125.00

375.00
1,750.00

June 2 2005 Order Granting


Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Application To Pay Filing Fees In
Installments. (Related Doc # 4);
June 13 2005 Order Dismissing
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Case for Debtor's Failure to
Timely File Required Documents.
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)

2.00

125.00

250.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

June 21 2005 Summary of


Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Affai
06/21/2005 Summary of
Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Aff
07/01/2005 Appellant
Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal,
and Findings of Fact Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: # I Findi
09/21/2005 District Court Order
entered within Civil Action #
05-CV-3689 Notice of Appeal
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
Regarding 6/13/2005 Order
Dismissing
10/05/2005 Final Order By
District Court Judge Anita B.
Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal
(CA-05-3689) Regarding
6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Ca
11/08/2005 Notice of Hearing to
Show Cause why this case should
not be not be Dismissed for
Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay
Filing Fees for Chapter 1

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

3.00

125.00

375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

3.00

125.00

375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

7.00

125.00

875.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

3.00

125.00

375.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

2.00

125.00

250.00

11/16/2005 Meeting of Creditors Chapter 11 Hours Bill


. 341 (a) meeting to be held on
12/15/2005 at 12:30 PM at
3cnfrm - 3rd Floor Conference
Room. Last day to oppose dis
11/29/2005 Drive to Reading to
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Final Installment Payment.
Receipt Number 20073978, Fee
Amount $839.00. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 11/29/2005) Drive to
Reading Co
General Hours Billed For Legal
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Work Done On Pro Se Chapter
11 Case
12/15/2005 Response dated
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
12/14/2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Regarding HEMAP
Appeal Hearing Request. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered:Page
12/16/2005)
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page114
35 of 44
190

2.00

125.00

250.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.63
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
112
12/02/2015
Page: 21a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Time For Court Appearance and Court Time Hours Bill


Litigation
Jan 9 2006 File Order Entered
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
that if a certificate of service of
the amended schedules or
amended matrix is not filed
within 20 days from the date of
this orde
01/23/2006 Certificate of Service Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone RE: Amended Schedules and
Response to Creditor Status
Order (related document(s)27).
(P.,
01/24/2006 Motion for Relief
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
from Stay. Fee Amount $150,
Filed by Fulton Bank
Represented by SHAWN M.
LONG (Counsel). Objections due
by 2/8/2006. (A
01/30/2006 Amended Schedule F Chapter 11 Hours Bill
(creditor added) Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number
20074148, Fee Amount $26.00
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 01/31/2006)
01/30/2006 Advanced Media
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Group Income Statements for the
year 2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # !_
Continuation of Reports) (P.,
Cathy)
02/02/2006 Certificate of Service Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone RE: Amended Schedules (related
document(s)35). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 02/02/2006)
02/02/2006 Debtor's Response to Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Motion of Fulton Bank for Relief
From Stay ; Response and
Exhibits thereto Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone (related do
02/10/2006 Monthly Operating
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Report for Filing for the month of
January 2006 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered:
02/10/2006)
02/21/2006 Hearing Held on 31
Court Time Hours Bill
Motion for Relief from Stay Filed
by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel).
Matter Taken Under Advisement.
(S., B
02/23/2006 Order Granting
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Motion for Relief from Stay
Regarding Property 220 Stone
Hill Road, Conestoga, PA Filed
by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LON
03/20/2006 Debtor Request for Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Hearing, and Certificate of
Service thereto Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 03/20/2006)
General Hours Billed For Legal
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Work Done On Pro Se Chapter
11 Case
03/31/2006 Order DENYING
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Debtor's (Second) Request for
Hearing because nothing is
pending before this Court on
which a hearing Page
might
be115
held,of 44
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
36
190
(related d

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

6.00

150.00

900.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

25.00

125.00

3,125.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

12.00

125.00

1,500.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

6.00

150.00

900.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.74
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
113
12/02/2015
Page: 22a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

2.00

125.00

250.00

04/10/2006 Order DENYING


Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Debtor's Motion to Stay All
Proceedings (Request for
Continuance) because nothing is
presently pending before this
Court that would
05/03/2006 Order (copy)
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
entered in District Court within
Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered
that the Appellant's motion for
continuance is Denied as Moot
(con
05/30/2006 05/30/2006
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
05/30/2006 Motion to Convert
Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount
$15.00, Motion to Dismiss Case
Filed by United States Trustee
Represente
06/08/2006 Certificate of Service Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
Regarding Documents sent to US
Trustee's Office. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 06/08/2006)
06/29/2006 Hearing Held - RE:
Court Time Hours Bill
Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
Filed by United States Trustee
(related document(s),60).
**MATTER T
07/10/2006 Debtor's Request
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe
to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 07
07/17/2006 Final Order By
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
District Court Judge Anita B.
Brody Regarding Debtor's Notice
of Appeal (Civil Action
#06-1538) of Bankruptcy Order
dated 2/23/200
07/18/2006 Debtor's Request
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
(dated 7/14/2006) for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(En
07/20/2006 Memorandum In
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Support of Motion to Dismiss
Filed by United States Trustee
Dept of Justice Dave P. Adams
08/03/2006 Hearing Set re
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Debtor's Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone (related
document 67
08/16/2006 Motion Debtor
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Request Continuance Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Represented
by Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 08/16/2006)
08/17/2006 Hearing Scheduled to Chapter 11 Hours Bill
provide court with difinitive
report status of Chapter 11 and to
address questions
about 116
the
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
37future
of 44
190
Heaing Notice Never Recieved

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

6.00

150.00

900.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

(related d
04/10/2006 Request for
Continuance of Chapter 11 Case
Filed'by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/10/2006)

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.85
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
114
12/02/2015
Page: 23a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Heaing Notice Never Recieved


General Hours Billed For Legal
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Work Done On Pro Se Chapter
11 Case
08/25/2006 DOCKETED IN
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
ERROR: entered on main case,
should be on adversary- See
Adversary 06-2236***Attach
PDF Document: Copy of Notice
of Appeal
08/31/Order Entered that the
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Bench Order Entered on today's
Record DENYING 67 Debtor's
Request (dated 7/6/2006) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed IFP
09/27/2006 Notice of Briefing
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Schedule issued by US District
Court - RE: Notice of Appeal
Civil Action 06-4212 (related
document(s)83). (P., Cathy)
10/03/2006 Order Granting
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
United States Trustee's Motion to
Dismiss Case, (related
document(s)60). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 10/03/2006)
10/19/2006 Notice of Appeal to
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
District Court - RE: Order
entered 10/3/2006 Granting
United States Trustee's Motion to
Dismiss Case ; Notice of Appeal,
and
01/18/2007 Motion for Debtor's Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Request (dated 1/13/2007) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed
by Stanley J. Caterbon
01/19/2007 Order DENYING
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Motion for Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing Transcripts,
Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
01/19/2007 Order DENYING
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Motion for Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing Transcripts,
Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
02/05/2007 Updated Creditor
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Matrix/Amendment to List of
Creditors (5 new names) Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone (Neither
Amended Schedules nor Certific
02/05/2007 Application to
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Waive Fee Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Represented by
Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 02/05/2007)
02/05/2007 Motion to
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Reconsider Order DENYING
Motion for Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing Transcripts,
Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis ; M
02/07/2007 Order DENYING
Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Debtor's Motion to Reconsider
Order dated 1/19/2007 and
DENYING Debtor's Application
to Waive Fee. (related
document(s)105,Page
1Page117
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
38 of 44
190

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:51.96
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
115
12/02/2015
Page: 24a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

02/09/2007 Letter Received from


Debtor Stanley J. Caterbone in
response to memorandum
regarding Local Rule 9014-3. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 02/13/2007)
02/20/2007 Notice of Appeal to
District Court of Order entered
2/7/2007 DENYING Debtor's
Motion to Reconsider Order
DENYING Debtor's Application
to Wa
02/26/2007 Corrective Entry RE: Notice of Appeal of Order
DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order and Debtor's
Application to Waive Fee Filed
by Stanl
03/06/2007 Order Supplementing
Order of February 7, 2007,
pursuant to Local Bankruptcy
Rule 8001-1 (c)(related
document(s)K)6). (B., Keith)
(Entere
03/20/2007 District Court
Acknowledgement of receiving
Bankruptcy Appeal
(CA-07-1093) Signed by Deputy
Clerk Steve Tomas - RE: Notice
of Appeal to District
05/18/2007 Notice of Change of
Address Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P.,Cathy) (Entered:
05/18/2007) 05/18/2007
Operating Report/Balance
05/18/2007 Operating
port/Balance Sheet 5/31/2007,
Income Statement for 5 months
ending 5/31/2007, Aged
Receivables as of 5/31/2007 Filed
by Stanley

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

2.00

125.00

250.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

125.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Chapter 11 Hours Bill

1.00

125.00

AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy


6/30/07

07-2151

April 30, 2007 - Bankruptcy Case Chapter 11 Appeal Ho


Docketed. Notice filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone. (clc)
May 10, 2007 - MOTION by
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Appellant to proceed in forma
pauperis, filed, (clc)
May 10, 2007 - APPEARANCE
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
from Attorney Dave Adams on
behalf of Appellee Kelly B.
Stapleton, filed, (clc)
May 21, 2007 - MOTION by
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Appellant for Request for
Recusal of Judge Rendell, filed.
Answer due 6/4/07. Certificate of
Service dated 5/18/07. (clc)
May 29, 2007 - ORDER (Clerk)
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
granting motion to proceed in
forma pauperis by Appellant.
The appeal will be submitted to a
panel for determination under 28
U.S.
June 8, 2007 - MOTION by
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Appellee to dismiss appeal, filed.
Answer due 6/25/07. Certificate
of Service dated 6/8/07. (clc)
June 19, 2007 - Answer to
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Motion to Dismiss by Appellant
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page118
39 of 44
190

Credit Amn

125.00
23,825.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

3.00

125.00

375.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.02
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
116
12/02/2015
Page: 25a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Caterbone v. U.S. Trustee


6/30/07

8/7/07

8/7/07

06-1538

1130 CD 2007

CI-07-00366

Credit Amn

2,500.00

June 9, 2006 - Notice of Appeal


to U.S. District Court Judge
Brody Appeal Fulton Bank Auto
-Stay
July 17, 2006 - Response to
Fulton Bank Answer to Appeal
August 5, 2006 - Judge Anity
Brody ORDER Appeal Denied
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

8.00

125.00

1,000.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

April 5, 2007 - Appeal Hearing


via Telephone at the Lancaster
County Assistance Office. CASE
NO. #360234927-002
April 10, 2007 - Prepare
supporting documents for appeal.
April 9, 2007 - ORDER, Denying
Appeal
April 26, 2007 - Final
Administrative Action Order,
DENYING BENEFITS
May 9, 2007 - Appeal Hearing
and Adjudication via Telephone
held at the Lancaster County
Assistance Office.
June 11, 2007 - Appeals Final
Decision/FAA
July 2, 2007 - ORDER Denying
Reconsideration
July 14, 2007 - Appeal to
Commonwealth Court
Rosen Appeals for Food Stamp
Benefits
Cooksey Appeals for Food
Stamps
Caterbone v. DPW Food Stamps

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

30.00

125.00

3,750.00

Hours Billed For Civil

30.00

125.00

3,750.00

1,875.00

January 16, 2007 - File Civil


Civil Litigation Hours
Action and In Forma Application
Caterbone v. Totaro, et al
January 23, 2007 - File Exhibits
Civil Litigation Hours
to Complaint
January 23, 2007 - Appearence
Civil Litigation Hours
by Stephanie Carfly of Barley
Snyder, LLP, for Fulton Bank
January 24, 2007 - ORDER In
Civil Litigation Hours
Forma Pauperis DENIED for
Frivilous by Judge Allison
January 25, 2007 - Notice of Rule Civil Litigation Hours
236 Notice sent by Prothonetary
January 29, 2007 - Appeal for
Civil Litigation Hours
Reconsideration to ORDER of
January 24, 2007 by Judge
Allison
February 8, 2007 - Preliminary
Civil Litigation Hours
Objections filed by Stepanie
Carfly of Barley Snyder, LLP for
Fulton Bank
February 20, 2007 - Brief filed by Civil Litigation Hours
Stepanie Carfly of Barley Snyder,
LLP for Fulton Bank in support
of Preliminary Objections
February 21, 2007 - Judge
Civil Litigation Hours
Allison ORDER DENIED
Appeal for Reconsideration
February 26, 2007 - Rule 236
Civil Litigation Hours
Notice from Prothonatary of
ORDER dated January 24, 2007
which was DENIED.
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page119
40 of 44
190

11,250.00
5.00

125.00

625.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

4.00

125.00

500.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.13
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
117
12/02/2015
Page: 26a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

February 28, 2007 - File


ANSWER to Fulton Bank's
Preliminary Objections
March 9, 2007- Filing Fees
Remained Unpaid for 10 Days
after Rule 236 - Judgement of
Non Pros Filed by Prothonatary
March 12, 2007- Christine
Munion, Esq., files Entry of
Appearance for Donald Totaro,
Lancaster County
Commissioners, Lancaster
County Sheriff, Lancaster County
March 13, 2007 - Praecipe filed
to DEFENDANT FULTON
BANK'S PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT TO THE COURT
FOR DISPOSITION WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SER
March 16, 2007 - Filed
Addendum to Defendants List
April 24, 2007 - Addendum to
Complaint filed
May 11, 2007 - Judgement-Non
Pros filed by Chrisine Munion for
Totaro as directed by Wenger,
Prothonotary
May 24, 2007 - Notice of Appeal
to Superior Court of the
Judgement of Non Pros
June 6, 2007 - Notice of Concise
Statement of Matters Complained
by June 21, 2007 by Judge
Allison
June 21, 2007 - Statement of
Matters Complained filed
July 2, 2007 - Response by
Fulton Bank on Statement of
Matters Complained
July 16, 2007 - OPINION filed
by Judge Paul K. Allison to
Superior Court
July 17, 2007 - Record Sent to
Superior Court by Lancaster
County Prothonatary 950 MDA
951 MDA
July 18, 2007 - ORDER from
Superior Court DISMISS 950 &
951
July 24, 2007 - Record Returned
from the Superior Court 950 &
951 Memorandum Filed

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

5.00

125.00

625.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

2.00

125.00

250.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

3.00

125.00

375.00

Hours Billed For Civil

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

Obstruction of Justice - EI
8/9/07

CI-07-00150

January 8, 2007 - (Emergency)


Civil Litigation Hours
for emergency food stamp
benefits and other benefits filed
by stanley j. Caterbone, plaintiff,
pro se. And affidavit of financial
January 9, 2007 - Filed: and now, Civil Litigation Hours
jan 8, 2007, upon consideration
of defendant's request to proceed
in forma pauperis,it is ordered
that such request is granted
January 16, 2007 - Praecipe for
Civil Litigation Hours
Appearance by Diana Clark, for
the Pennsylvania Department of
Welfare
January 29, 2007Page
-Page
Preliminary
Civil Litigation Hours
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
120
41 of 44
190
Objections Filed by Diana Clark

Credit Amn

250.00
7,375.00

5.00

125.00

625.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00 November
250.00
Saturday,
Tuesday
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.24
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
118
12/02/2015
Page: 27a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
Objections Filed by Diana Clark
of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in
Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark
and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer
to Preliminary Objections
May 29, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance Before Business
Judge for Food Stamps to
Reinaker, Recusal
May 30, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance before Business
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to
hear case
Emergency Food Stamps

8/9/07

CI-07-00019

January 2, 2007 - To proceed


informa pauperis with affidavit of
financial service filed by
Caterbone, pro se. In support of
petition to set aside sale
January 2, 2007 - Caption
Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
Lancaster County Sheriff
Department
January 4, 2007 - In Forma
Pauperis GRANTED by Judge
Dennis E. Reinaker
January 5, 2007 - Addition to
Compliant (Please Add To
Complaint)
January 31, 2007 - Response Of
fulton bank to stanley j.
Caterbone's petition to set aside
sale of real estate. Filed by:
shawn m. Long, esq. Certificate
of ser
January 31, 2007 - Notice of
Meeting Before Business Judge
Michael Georgelis filed by
Shawn Long
February 1, 2007 - Meeting
before Judge Georgelis and
ORDER TO DISMISS
PETITION DENIED
February 6, 2007 - Reply to
Response of Fulton Bank
February 6, 2007 - Notice of
DENIAL to all parties
February 20, 2007 - From james
d. Mccullough, deputy
prothonotary, superior court of
pennsylvania. Returned herein is
the notice of appeal received in
the proth

Item Description

Qty

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

2,500.00
Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

3.00

125.00

375.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Hours Billed For Civil

4.00

125.00

500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

Petition To Set Aside Sale


8/9/07

CI-06-02271

Credit Amn

March 8, 2006 - In mortgage


Civil Litigation Hours
foreclosure filed by shawn m
long esq(ma). The mortgage was
recordedin the office of the
recorder of deeds of and for
lancaster coun
April 11, 2006 - Complaint. Filed Civil Litigation Hours
by shawn m. Long, esq.
Reinstated as 1.directed by
randall o. Wenger, prothonotary.
(2 copies to atty,Page
1Page
copy 121
of42 of 44
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
190
complaint wit

250.00
3,875.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

1.00

125.00

125.00

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.35
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
119
12/02/2015
Page: 28a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description

Item Description

Qty

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

5.00

125.00

625.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

4.00

125.00

500.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

August 8, 2006 - Served Def.


Civil Litigation Hours
Stanley j. Caterbone, personally,
with a notice of sale and/or
handbill at lancaster county
courthouse, 50 north duke st
August 11, 2006 - In Forma
Civil Litigation Hours
Pauperis With praecipe to
proceed in forma pauperis
presented to court
and court
Advanced Media Group
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI
Page
Page
122
43 of 44
190
enters order granting in forma

1.00

125.00

125.00

2.00

125.00

250.00

complaint wit
May 1, 2006 - Complaint Served,
Civil action complaint upon
stanley caterbone by personal
service at lancaster county
sheriff's office,50 north duke
street, lan
May 8, 2006 - Answer to
Complaint filed
June 6, 2006 - Brief In support
of plaintiff's motion for judgment
on the pleadings. Filed by shawn
m. Long, esq. Certificate of
service of same.
June 6, 2006 - Motion by Fulton
for judgement on the pleadings
filed by Shawn M. Long
June 28, 2006 - Praecipe filed to
assign Plaintiff fulton bank's
motion for summary judgment to
the court for disposition as
unopossed with certific
June 29, 2006 - ORDER Filed:
and now, this 29th day of june,
2006, upon consideration of
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings, as well as
defendants
July 20, 2006 - Enter judgment
on behalf of plaintiff and against
defendant, stanley j. Caterbone in
the amount of $97,425.07, plus
continuing interest after ma
July 25, 2006 - Filed Notice of
Appeal to Superior Court Case
No.
July 28, 2006 - A hearing on the
defendant's application for in
forma pauperis status will be held
in curtroom 5 at 9:00 a.m. on
wednesday, august 9, 2006. By t
July 31, 2006 - Filed. Writ issued.
Affidavit of non-military service.
Principal: $88,568.53; interest to
03/02/2006 at a rate of $14.56 per
diem: $4,442.96; ne
July 31, 2006 - Affidavit - rule
3129 7/31/2006 Concerning the
real property located at 220 stone
hill road a/k/a lot #5 stone hill
road, township of conestog
July 31, 2006 - Notice of
7/31/2006 Sheriff's sale of real
property to stanley j. Caterbone at
220 stone hill road, conestoga, pa
17516. Filed by shawn m. Long
August 1, 2006 - 220 stone hill
road, a/k/a lot #5 stone hill rd.,
conestoga, conestoga township
56 December 20, 2006. Received
check from barley snyder i

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Case: 15-3400
2/12/08
at 09:15:52.40
Stan J.
Caterbone
Habeus

Document:
Corpus
Case

003112143900 Page:
120
12/02/2015
Page: 29a
Third
CircuitDate
CourtFiled:
of Appeal
Case No. 16-1001
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal

For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008


Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date

Invoice

Customer ID

Line Description
enters order granting in forma
pauperis status. Mich
August 11, 2006 - Filed. The
defendant has appealed my june
29, 2006 order granting the
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings. He is directed to
file
August 17, 2006 - Of notice of
sheriff's sale by mail to
lienholders on aug. 11, 2006.
Filed by shawn m. Long, esq. Of
the notice of sheriff sale upon
defenda
August 31, 2006 - Served Writ of
Execution
September 5, 2006-OPINION
Pursuant to pa.r.a.p. 1025(a)
filed. By the court: michael a.
Georgelis, judge. Copies w/236
notice sent to: stanley j.
Caterbone, pro
September 6, 2006-The superior
court of pennsylvania - no. 1463
mda 2006. Copy of the list of
record documents sent to: stanley
j. Caterbone, pro se and shawn m
January 8, 2006-Certified copy of
Order from the superior court of
pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda
2006 filed. And now, this fourth
day of january, 2007
Fulton v. Caterbone Foreclosur

Item Description

Qty

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

2.00

125.00

250.00

Civil Litigation Hours

1.00

125.00

125.00

Civil Litigation Hours

4.00

125.00

500.00

Total

Advanced Media Group


DRAFT-PETITION
FOR Pro
A WRIT
Se Billings
OF CERTIORARI Page
Page123
44 of 44
190

Unit Price Debit Amnt

Credit Amn

5,375.00
284,327.50

284,327.50

Saturday,
Tuesday
November
August 7,
9, 2015
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page124
45 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page125
46 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page126
47 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page127
48 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page128
49 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page129
50 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page130
51 of
of111
190

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

1 of 2

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?290428435764926-L_1_0-1

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001


CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R

United States District Court


Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ

Date Filed: 07/17/2015


Date Terminated: 08/25/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION et al


Assigned to: HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER
related Case: 2:06-cv-05138-JCJ
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Petitioner
STANLEY J. CATERBONE

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE


1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
PRO SE

V.
Respondent
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
CRAIG STEDMAN
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DET. LT. CLARK BEARIWGER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER CITY POLICE
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
FAIRMONT BEHAVIOR SYSTEM
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
SILVIA GRATZ
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER
Respondent
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA

Date Filed

Docket Text

07/17/2015

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jwl, )
(Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2015: # 2 Envelope) (jwl, ). Modified on 7/21/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 07/20/2015)

07/24/2015

APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (pr, ) (Entered:
07/24/2015)

07/31/2015

ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD
FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 AND BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION
NUMBER; PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED; AND PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT THE FIVE
DOLLAR ($5.00) FILING FEE TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS ACTION WILL BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/28/15. 7/31/15 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF A 2254 PETITION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS.(pr, ) (Entered:
07/31/2015)

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page131
52 of
of111
190

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
12/16/2015 5:08 AM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

2 of 2

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?290428435764926-L_1_0-1

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case


08/10/2015

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Copy of Order dated 7/28/15, blank 2254 petition form and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to STANLEY J. CATERBONE for
the following reason: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.(Re-sending to STANLEY J. CATERBONE, 1250 FREMONT ST.,
LANCASTER, PA 17603) (pr, ) (Entered: 08/10/2015)

08/17/2015

NOTICE/MOTION of Change of Address by STANLEY J. CATERBONE(ti, ) (Entered: 08/18/2015)

08/19/2015

Revised Habeas Petition Forms returned filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(pr, ) (Entered: 08/20/2015)

08/25/2015

ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER;
AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/25/15.
8/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, ) (Entered: 08/25/2015)

09/04/2015

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO REGISTER AS AN ECF FILING USER IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF
COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROCESS PETITIONER'S REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO PROCEDURE 4(b) UNDER L.R.C.P. 5.1.2.. SIGNED BY
HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/2/2015. 9/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) (Entered: 09/04/2015)

10/09/2015

Exhibit by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 10/13/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 10/09/2015)

12/10/2015

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.**(FILED IN ERROR, PRO SE TO MAIL IN ORIGINAL FOR
FILING)**(CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 12/14/2015 (tjd). (Entered: 12/10/2015)

12/16/2015

10

Statement "Open Letter to the Editor of Newslanc.com re Kathleen Kane and Old Boys Network" - December 15, 2015 by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
(CATERBONE, STANLEY) (Entered: 12/16/2015)

PACER Service Center


Transaction Receipt
12/16/2015 05:06:41
PACER Login:

am6446:3514696:0

Client Code:

Description:

Docket Report

Search Criteria:

5:15-cv-03984-JCJ

Billable Pages:

Cost:

0.20

DRAFT-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page


Page132
53 of
of111
190

Tuesday
Monday August 9,
8, 2016
12/16/2015 5:08 AM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

1 of 1

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?175217071392167

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Motions
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ CATERBONE
v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION et al CASE
CLOSED on 08/25/2015
CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R
United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 12/10/2015 at 4:09 AM EST and filed on 12/10/2015
Case Name:
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION et al
Case Number:
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
Filer:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 08/25/2015
Document Number: 9
Docket Text:
Amended MOTION for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.Writ of Habeus Corpus.(CATERBONE, STANLEY)

5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Notice has been electronically mailed to:


STANLEY J. CATERBONE

scaterbone@live.com, stan.caterbone@yahoo.com

5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Notice will not be electronically mailed to:


The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:n/a
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1001600548 [Date=12/10/2015] [FileNumber=13818260
-0] [9632f7d5e7d61d69dc428775aa7c102b1dad367f47fa2a82806d1b0cbd1424926
a32414243327a027e979febbeab170c04c45ad59943b2bfed1a4a5f156fd4e8]]

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
133
541of
of
of111
190
58

Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:10 AM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

1 of 2

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?719972679673354-L_1_0-1

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001


CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R

United States District Court


Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ

CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION et al


Assigned to: HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER
related Case: 2:06-cv-05138-JCJ
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Date Filed: 07/17/2015


Date Terminated: 08/25/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Petitioner
STANLEY J. CATERBONE

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE


1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
PRO SE

V.
Respondent
LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS
INTERVENTION
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
CRAIG STEDMAN
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DET. LT. CLARK BEARIWGER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
LANCASTER CITY POLICE
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
FAIRMONT BEHAVIOR SYSTEM
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
SILVIA GRATZ
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
TERMINATED: 08/19/2015
Respondent
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
LANCASTER
Respondent
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA

Date Filed

Docket Text

07/17/2015

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(jwl, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2015: # 2 Envelope) (jwl, ). Modified on 7/21/2015 (afm, ). (Entered:
07/20/2015)

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
134
552of
of
of111
190
58

Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:12 AM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

2 of 2

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?719972679673354-L_1_0-1

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

07/24/2015

APPLICATION to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (pr,
) (Entered: 07/24/2015)

07/31/2015

ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S CURRENT
STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2254 AND BEARING THE ABOVECAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED;
AND PETITIONER SHALL SUBMIT THE FIVE DOLLAR ($5.00) FILING FEE TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS
OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER..
SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/28/15. 7/31/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE
PETITIONER WITH A BLANK COPY OF A 2254 PETITION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS.(pr, ) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

08/10/2015

Copy of Order dated 7/28/15, blank 2254 petition form and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE for the following reason: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.(Re-sending to STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, 1250 FREMONT ST., LANCASTER, PA 17603) (pr, ) (Entered: 08/10/2015)

08/17/2015

NOTICE/MOTION of Change of Address by STANLEY J. CATERBONE(ti, ) (Entered: 08/18/2015)

08/19/2015

Revised Habeas Petition Forms returned filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(pr, ) (Entered: 08/20/2015)

08/25/2015

ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIMS; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL
CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY
HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/25/15. 8/25/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, )
(Entered: 08/25/2015)

09/04/2015

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO REGISTER AS AN ECF FILING USER IS GRANTED AND
THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROCESS PETITIONER'S REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO PROCEDURE 4(b)
UNDER L.R.C.P. 5.1.2.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 9/2/2015. 9/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) (Entered: 09/04/2015)

10/09/2015

Exhibit by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (CATERBONE, STANLEY) Modified on 10/13/2015 (afm, ). (Entered: 10/09/2015)

12/10/2015

Amended MOTION for Writ of Habeus Corpus filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.Writ of Habeus Corpus.(CATERBONE,
STANLEY) (Entered: 12/10/2015)

PACER Service Center


Transaction Receipt
12/10/2015 04:11:50
PACER Login:

am6446:3514696:0

Client Code:

Description:

Docket Report

Search Criteria:

5:15-cv-03984-JCJ

Billable Pages:

Cost:

0.20

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
135
563of
of
of111
190
58

Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
8, 2015
9,
2016
12/10/2015 4:12 AM

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________________________________________
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
:
Advanced Media Group
:
CIVIL DIVISION
Petitioner
:
CASE NO.
15-03984
:
v.
:
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention
:
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police
Lancaster City Police Department
Dr. Silvia Gratz, Chief Medical Officer and
Fairmount Behavioral Health System
:
Defendants
:

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS

AND NOW, on this 10th day of December 2015, the PETITIONER, Stanley J.
Caterbone/Advanced Media Group, do hereby file the following pursuant to the Federal
Habeas Corpus statutes prescribed in 28 2242 as prescribed by law. The Plaintiff alleges
violations according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal habeas corpus statutes which
states: where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.

The Plaintiff alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987, and
that the activities surrounding the PETITIONER'S life since June of 2015 immediately
following the filing of an amicus curiae in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Case of this same
said court, No. 14-02559, in which the PETITIONER was named MOVANT, has escalated into a
daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while the PETITIONER has made many in person
complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the most recent to the Manheim
Township Substation in Lancaster Township regarding an assault at the Manor Shopping
Center minutes previously (December 9, 2015 9:00pm), the pleas for help and assistance
have yielded nothing but more attacks to the PETITIONER'S person, property, electronics,
home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
136
57
14of
of
of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made claims of


COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these same
said actors and perpetrators. The PETITIONER will provide evidence to support this writ and
offer a final remedy and redress in accordance with federal law.

The federal bench must

consider the fact that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been complicit in the most
extreme way in these allegations, and therefore should be barred from adjudicating this
Habeus Corpus in any manner.

The letter and acknowledgment to and from Pennsylvania

Attorney General Ms. Kathleen Kane should suffice.

The PETITIONER acknowledges that this petition may lead to a landmark decision,
however, the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, and the military
industrial complex had it coming for a very long time.

In fact, all things considered, they

may welcome the purging of these technologies, the technologies and tactics of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.

See my Press Release and Executive Summary for further

deliberations.

Date: December 10, 2015

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone,


Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
137
58
25of
of
of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

JURISDICTION
Birth of the Modern Writ. In 1867, Congress substantially increased the jurisdiction
of federal courts to issue the writ by authorizing its issuance in all cases, state or federal,
where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States.16 Originally, habeas corpus
permitted collateral attack upon a prisoner's conviction only if the sentencing court lacked
subject matter jurisdiction. Shortly after 1867, however, the Supreme Court began to
recognize a growing number of circumstances where courts were said to have acted beyond
their jurisdiction because some constitutional violation had extinguished or "voided" their
jurisdiction.17 This development was of limited benefit to most prisoners, since most were
confined under state convictions and relatively few of the rights guaranteed by the
Constitution were thought to apply against the states. Even when a constitutional claim was
available, state prisoners could not be granted federal habeas relief until all possibility of
state judicial relief trial, appellate, and post conviction had been exhausted.181
FOOTNOTES: 1 16 That the several courts of the United States, and the several justices and
judges of such courts, within their respective jurisdictions, in addition to the authority already
conferred by law, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus in all cases where any
person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the constitution, or of any treaty
or law of the United States; and it shall be lawful for such person so restrained of his or her
liberty to apply to either of said justices or judges for a writ of habeas corpus, which
application shall be in writing and verified by affidavit, and shall set forth the facts concerning
the detention of the party applying, in whose custody he or she is detained, and by virtue of
what claim or authority, if known; and the said justice or judge to whom such application
shall be made shall forthwith award a writ of habeas corpus, unless it shall appear from the
petition itself that the party is not deprived of his or her liberty in contravention of the
constitution or laws of the United States, 14 Stat. 385-86 (1867). At the same time,
Congress modified and codified much of the procedure associated with the writ, including an
appellate provision that was soon thereafter repealed, 15 Stat. 44 (1868); see Ex parte
McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1869).
17 See e.g.: Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S.(18 Wall.) 163 (1874). Lange had been convicted of an
offense punishable by a fine or term of imprisonment. The trial court had sentenced him to a
fine and a term of imprisonment. Lange paid his fine and was imprisoned. The Court held that

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
138
59
36of
of
of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

once Lange had paid the fine the trial court lost all jurisdiction over the case and thus his
confinement was subject to the writ. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880). In Siebold,
although the statute in question was found to be within the power of Congress, the Court
held that had the prisoner been convicted under an unconstitutional law he would have been
entitled to discharge upon the writ.
Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417 (1885). The Court held that Wilson was entitled to discharge
on the writ because the trial court had exceeded its jurisdiction when it tried, convicted and
sentenced him to fifteen years hard labor based upon an information filed by the district
attorney rather than upon a grand jury indictment as required by the Fifth Amendment in the
case of all capital and otherwise infamous crimes. In re Snow, 120 U.S. 274 (1887). Snow
was convicted of three counts of cohabitation based on the same conduct during three
different periods of time. The Court found that the misconduct was one continuous offense
rather than three offenses. Since three sentences would constitute multiple punishment
contrary to the Fifth Amendment, the trial court had acted beyond its jurisdiction and the writ
should issue.

Date: December 10, 2015

/S/ Stanley J. Caterbone,


Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
139
60
47of
of
of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

1.____________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS has been
served this 24th day of July 2015, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or by electronic mail upon,
or by hand deliver to:

Date: December 10, 2015

_____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
140
61
58of
of
of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001


scaterbone@live.com

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
141
62
69of
of
1of55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
142
63
710
of
ofof
55
111
190
58

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664

May 21, 2009


To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
143
64
811
of
ofof
55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
144
65
912
of
of
2of
55
111
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
145
66
10
13
of
of
3of111
55
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon


Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
146
67
11
14
of
of
4of111
55
190
58
Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
147
68
12
15
of
of
5of111
55
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Richmond council passes resolution


supporting ban on space-based
weapons

May 20, 2015


FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
148
69
13
16
of
of
8of111
55
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

dumb ideas, Bates said.


Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based


weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments

1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!


15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
149
70
14
17
of
of
9of111
55
190
58

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
150
71
15
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
118
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009

Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated:

October 10, 2015

Date Completed:
Date Initiated:

July 28, 2009


July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
151
72
16
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
219
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015


In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.

From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.

The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.

By

the

end

of

the

summer

of

2010

every

social

media

site,

including

the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and


coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.

And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.

Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.

The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle


Lambert.

In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate


murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
152
73
17
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
320
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.

However, this time there was

no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.

The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.

The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.

The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
153
74
18
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
421
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45


audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.

In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.

Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
154
75
19
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
522
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.

After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.

However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.

This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.

Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.

This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.

ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

INTERNATIONAL

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
155
76
20
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
623
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the


Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James


Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
156
77
21
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
724
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),


Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP


Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.

Information and findings are still being

Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.


Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
157
78
22
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
825
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Change the history of events and the truth.


THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.

During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.

This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
158
79
23
of
ofof111
55
190
58
Page
926
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND


WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.

Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.

This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.

See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
159
80
24
27
of
of
55
190
58
Page
10
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.

He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke


and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.

Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
160
81
25
28
of
of
55
190
58
Page
11
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.

He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.

His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.

The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.

However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.

On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.

The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.

He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,

former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
161
82
26
29
of
of
55
190
58
Page
12
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.

By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.

Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School.

After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.

While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.

It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.

The

The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.

Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.

John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
162
83
27
30
of
of
55
190
58
Page
13
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.

Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..

Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.

The same was true of his businesses.

Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.

There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;

every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
163
84
28
31
of
of
55
190
58
Page
14
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD


The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare


and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:


www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
164
85
29
32
of
of
55
190
58
Page
15
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW


** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.

This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season.

On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009


Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
165
86
30
33
of
of
55
190
58
Page
16
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
166
87
31
34
of
of
55
190
58
Page
17
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.


Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
167
88
32
35
of
of
55
190
58
Page
18
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
168
89
33
36
of
of
55
190
58
Page
19
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
169
90
34
37
of
of
55
190
58
Page
20
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.

The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
170
91
21
35
38
of
ofof111
41
55
190
58

Thursday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
October
August10,
11,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
171
92
36
39
of
ofof111
55
190
58

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
172
93
37
40
of
ofof111
55
190
58

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
173
94
38
41
of
ofof111
55
190
58

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST


STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
September 27, 2015
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of


2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
174
95
39
42
of
of
55
190
58
Page
25
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice


15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

Dated: September 27, 2015

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
175
96
40
43
of
of
55
190
58
Page
26
ofof111
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
176
97
41
44
of
of
55
190
58
Page
27
ofof111
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
177
98
42
45
of
of
55
190
58
Page
28
ofof111
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
Page
178
99
43
46
of
of
55
190
58
Page
29
ofof111
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

! "

"

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

$% &
!

" #

%
"&#
(

'
!

(
,

"

"

")

"

""
-

)
!
! "
!

'
%

" !
"

!
)

+
!

" *
"

"
,

,
,

*
%

*
(

%
!
/"0

1
1 ,
"
"

4
!

"

"
!

!
#
.

.
&,,0
%

1 ,

2"3

!
)

** ! "
&,,..$/

&,,

%
&,,
%

&

, "

"

00

"

!,

"

6
7

7 , !
&,,-

8,
:
(

$;$

"2

! " ,

, ,

** !

;
5

$
!

&,,@

,
.

&<;=

>
1

9
,

&,,=
$

,
>
A

1 B3

.+

&,,=
1 B3

2
>
%

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
100
179
44
47of
111
190
58
Page
30
ofof55
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

<

1
1

* "
!

"
C#

"

<
*

&, ,

24

#9

; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%

&,,0 4
! %3

"

"

!
&,,
%

"$

'
5

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

4
D

%
%

"

""

,! "
0 =

0 =9

9
00&9 00

:
9

&,,-

&, , $
!

%
!
D

%
%

=
F
!

))
+

/4

),

"

0 =

/
$

G
3

%
00

3
3

"

%#
$

$
&, ,

&,,4

!- "

.
&,,@

,
*

&,,<
E

&,,

-) !
/ 4

24
/

$
D

&, ,
D

$
&,,-

&,,0

%
D

!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D

$
A
8F
$

%
;

D
.

%
&,,3
E
$

*
00=; 00

$
5

! 7

0 =
00

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
101
180
45
48of
111
190
58
Page
31
ofof55
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

)
A

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

24
$;$

00
(F

&

%
B

5
00 9

" * <
00=( 00 9

:#

> ) "" ""


$

;3

#, " !
&,,-

"

"

"

0 =
&, ,

/
.
$

B
3

3
=

0 =

) "

.
&,,1

0 =

24

" "
3

"
&,,@

" E

""

B
$

<

&,,1

.
&,,-

,-(&&
2

=
@,

"

&,
3

&,,!

&,,@

&,,@

0 =
@, 1

&,,@
9
!
@,

#" !,
0 =

" "1 ,

"

"*

":

" E
F

&,,-

!
B

/
!

"

00=( 00 9
B
:
9

$
'

.
&,,1
9

0 =
&, ,

/
.

00 9

/
&,,9

&,

( "

!
.

00

$
!

&, ,
F

3
7

8
!

&,,

&, ,

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
102
181
46
49of
111
190
58
Page
32
ofof55
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

&

, * "

&&

*#
"

&:

;!

&<

:
%

$
&, ,

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001


$
&,,-

!-

,
5
%

"

>

$
$

< !-

24

? "
;

>

&,,0
B

&,,%
(

$
&, ,

&-

A
.+ $

&@

! :

&,,$

: , *

&, ,

* @

&,,@

"
E

3
&,,

"

&,,0

7 "!

7 "
0 =
*

&=

) "

":

)"

&,,@
"

&

&0

!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,

00

:,

!6

"

"

" .
9 &,,0

0 = "&#

, *

&,,@
/

" F
0 =

;A

0 =
F

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
103
182
47
50of
111
190
58
Page
33
ofof55
41

0 =

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

3
"

$
+

$
.

0 =

I $
!

0 =

.
$

"2

'

+$;F
D
"$

&,;&,
3
A

00

'
$ 24

"1E1# $

K
E
A

00&

>

L
F

F
B

F
+

0=,K
A

$
$

1
+

>

1
$
>

B
!

3
F

1
00
) % 3
&,,-

!
>

! A !

00,K
1 B3
>

F
F
& 1

F
8

! 4

'
A

! 4

A
0=,K

F
00,K

0 ,K

0<,K

3
/

>

%
&,,

) %$

0@,K
0@,K
$

2!
A

D 1

"
$

0 <9 F

4
A? D!B
#
*

$
7

+
00

D 18

.
E

$
M 1
00= E

0 =
%

0 ,K
$

0 =

M
00
!

&,,9

(
9

!
1

,-(

$ !2B+EF2

(&&

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
104
183
48
51of
111
190
58
Page
34
ofof55
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

") !

"

7!

N
.
!
5
F

(
(

5
G
*

A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!

,
B

A
" " * #" !, " "

$C

* #" !, D

73

8
* 7

,
"

"

&

"
#

.
"

#(

5
7
9

'
5

%
7A

8 !

8 !

'

!
7D .2

O
% 8

'
7

'

(
(

%
%

4
K
K

M %

%
K
'

7E

(
8

"

%
'

%(

(
(

4
;

(
7
7

87

(
(

8
8

- 7 > !,

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
105
184
49
52of
111
190
58
Page
35
ofof55
41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

* , "
!

B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B

@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD

B@
)
B@

DD
!
!

))

1"

)
*
!
")

1
3
1

"

)
)

, "

*"

"
, "

!
*

"

")

"

7
"!

"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "

*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !

)
*

"E

DD

")

E DD
%

,
!

!"

, "

"

"

"

1 ,"

DD

*)

PPPPPPP "

>7

%#

'?

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

"

June 19, 2015


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP

15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98


PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.

I
&, ,

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
106
185
50
53of
111
190
58
Page
36
ofof55
41

Don't Know When

24

$
$

Q &, , "!
I

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
107
186
51
54of
111
190
58
Page
37
ofof55
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 35 of 41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
108
187
52
55of
111
190
58
Page
38
ofof55
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 36 of 41

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
109
188
53
56of
111
190
58
Page
39
ofof55
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
110
189
54
57of
111
190
58
Page
40
ofof55
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Stan J. Caterbone Habeus Corpus Case

15-03984 Caterbone
DRAFT-PETITION
FOR
Habeus
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Page
Page
Page
111
190
55
58of
111
190
58
Page
41
ofof55
41

Third Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 16-1001

Thursday,
Friday,
Tuesday
Monday
December
August
11,
10,
8, 2015
9,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

You might also like