Professional Documents
Culture Documents
opts out
and why?
Results from a national survey on
opting out of standardized tests
OREN PIZMONY-LEVY
NANCY GREEN SARAISKY
AUGUST 2016
Abouttheauthors
Dr.OrenPizmonyLevyisanAssistantProfessorintheDepartmentofInternationalandTranscultural
StudiesatTeachersCollege,ColumbiaUniversity.HeholdsaPhDinsociologyandcomparativeand
internationaleducationfromIndianaUniversity,Bloomington.Hisresearchandteachingfocusonthe
intersectionbetweeneducationandsocialmovements.Hismainlineofresearchexaminesthe
emergencesofinternationallargescaleassessmentsandtheirconsequencesforpublicdiscourseand
publicopinionworldwide.HealsoconductsresearchontheworkofyouthandeducationalNGOsinthe
environmentalmovementandintheLGBTQmovement.Email:op2183@tc.columbia.edu
Dr.NancyGreenSaraiskyisaResearchAssociateatTeachersCollege,ColumbiaUniversity.Sheholdsa
PhDinPoliticalScienceandComparativeEducationfromColumbiaUniversity,whereherstudieswere
fundedbytheNationalScienceFoundation.Hercurrentworkfocusesonthepoliticsofassessment,
bothdomesticallyandinternationally.Sheisalsointerestedintheroleofideasineducationpolicy;
publicopinionandelitepreferencesinpolicyformation;andtheroleofcultureineducationalsuccess.
Shehaspreviouslyheldavarietyofpositionsinphilanthropy,governmentandjournalism.
Email:nlg2004@tc.columbia.edu
Whenreferencingthisdocument,werecommendthefollowingcitation:
PizmonyLevy,O.andGreenSaraisky,N.(2016).Whooptsoutandwhy?Resultsfromanationalsurvey
onoptingoutofstandardizedtests.ResearchReport.NewYork:TeachersCollege,ColumbiaUniversity.
Graphicdesign:PierluigiBellini
Electronicversionsofthisreportandotherresearchreportsfromthisstudyareavailableat:
http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/
Thestudywasnotassociatedwithanygrantorotherfundingfromeitherpublicorprivatesources.
Acknowledgments
FirstandforemosttheauthorswishtothanktheindividualswhocompletedtheNationalSurveyon
OptingOutofStandardizedTests.Theresponsestheyprovidedoffernewinsightsintotheoptout
movement,andwearegratefulfortheirtimeandthoughtfulness.RosemarieJensen,Morna
McDermott,ChristineMcGooey,TimSlekarandSandyStenoff,allofwhomaredeeplyinvolvedinthe
optoutmovement,providedfeedbackandinsightinthedevelopmentandpilotingofthesurvey.We
arealsoindebtedtotheadministratorsofthelocal,stateandnationaloptoutgroupswhoassistedwith
thesurveyimplementationanddissemination.AtTeachersCollegeandColumbiaUniversity,several
colleaguesprovidedexcellentguidanceandfeedback.ThankstoChristineBaron,DanielFriedrich,Britt
Hamre,JeffHenig,CeliaOyler,andPriscilla(Penny)Wohlstetter.ThanksalsotoLesleyBartlett,Todd
Beer,MarkLindeman,BrianPowellandFabioRojasfortheirtimeandexpertise.Finally,wethankour
wonderfulresearchassistantsAnneBurley,SonalChheda,AdrianCuevas,ShinjiKatsumoto,and
LizbethMoralesforalloftheirhardwork.
ListofTablesandFigures
Table1
Table2
Figure1
Figure2
Figure3
Figure4
Figure5
Figure6
Figure7
Figure8
Figure9
Figure10
Figure11
Figure12
Figure13
Figure14
Figure15
Figure16
Figure17
Figure18A
Figure18B
Figure19
Figure20
Figure21
Figure22
Figure23
Figure24
Figure25
Figure26
Sampledescription,byparentalstatus
Distributionofresponsesbystates
Threestepstowardparticipationinoptout
Respondentsbygeographicregion
Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?
Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Byregion
Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Byeducation
Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Bypoliticalideology
Howdidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?
Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknow
moreaboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?
Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknow
moreaboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Byregion
Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknow
moreaboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Bypolitical
ideology
Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknow
moreaboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Byteachersvs.
nonteachers
Networkoforganizationsintheoptoutmovement
Networkofhighlyactiveorganizationsintheoptoutmovement
Whendidyoufirstoptoutfromstandardizedtesting?
Haveyouevertakenanyofthefollowingactionsrelatingtooptingout?
Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout(topfivereasons)
Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout(toptworeasons)
Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,bypoliticalideology
Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,bypartyidentification
Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,byteachersvs.non
teachers
Whatgradewouldyougivepublicschoolsinyourcommunity?
Howsupportiveareyouofthefollowingtypesofstudenttests?
%verysupportive
Howsupportiveareyouofthefollowingtypesofstudenttests?
%verysupportiveandsupportive
Howimportantarethefollowingideasforimprovingpublicschoolsinyour
community?
Inyouropinion,whichofthefollowingapproacheswouldprovidethemost
accuratepictureofastudentsacademicprogress?
Whoshouldhavethegreatestinfluenceonthefollowingeducationissuesink12
publicschools?
Perceivedimpactoftheoptoutmovementatthestateandfederallevels
ExecutiveSummary
Duringthepastfewyearstheoptoutmovement,inwhichparentsrefusetohavetheirschoolaged
childrentakefederallymandatededucationalassessments,hasgainedmomentum.Yetmanyimportant
questionsaboutoptingoutremainunanswered:Whoisactuallyoptingout?Whatmotivatesparents
whoopttheirchildrenoutofthetests?Arethosewhooptouttryingtoprotecttheirchildren,ordo
theyhavebroaderpoliticalaims?Thesearesomeofthequestionsthatweaimtoaddressinthisstudy.
DataforthisstudycomefromtheNationalSurveyonOptingOut,whichwasconductedfromJanuary
20,2016throughMarch31,2016.Werecruitedrespondentsonline,throughlinksonthewebpagesand
socialmediachannelsofoptoutgroups.Thesurveywasadministeredelectronically.Thesample
consistedofatotalof1,641respondentsfrom47states.
Somekeyfindingsare:
Theoptoutmovementincludesmorethanjustparentswhohaveoptedtheirchildrenout.
Italsoincludesparentswhosechildrenareinpublicschoolbutdidnotoptout;parentswhose
childrenarehomeschooledand/orinprivateschool;andindividualswithoutchildrenwhoare
supportingthemovement.Aboutfourfifthsoftherespondents(81.5percent)wereparentsor
guardiansofschoolagedchildren.Thevastmajorityofthem(92.9percent)indicatedthattheir
childrenattendedpublicschools.
Approximatelythreequartersofrespondentswhoareparentsorguardiansofschoolaged
children(74.5percent)haveoptedtheirchildrenoutoftesting.Nineoutoften(92.1percent)
respondentswhoareparentsorguardiansofschoolagedchildrensaidtheyarelikelytooptout
inthefuture.
Parentsrefusestandardizedtestseveninstateswhereoptingoutisnotpermittedor
discouragedbypolicymakers.Theshareofparentswhooptedoutislowestinstateswhereopt
outisprohibited(73.2percent)andhighestinstateswhererefusalandoptoutarepermitted
withconstraints(85.7percent).Wefindnosignificantdifferencesinoptingoutbetween
respondentsresidinginstateswhereoptoutispermittedandotherrespondents.
Thetypicaloptoutactivistisahighlyeducated,white,married,politicallyliberalparent
whosechildrenattendpublicschoolandwhosehouseholdmedianincomeiswellabovethe
nationalaverage.ThemovementbringstogetherDemocrats(46.1percent),Republicans(15.1
percent),Independents(33.3percent),andsupportersofotherparties(5.5percent).
Mostparticipantshavecometotheoptoutmovementduringthepast34years,withalmost
half(48.9percent)joiningduringthepasttwoyears.SocialmediaFacebook,Twitter,etc.
playakeyroleinmobilizingparticipants,asdosocialnetworks.Abouttwofifths(38.8percent)
heardforthefirsttimeaboutthemovementthroughsocialmedia.Butpatternsofmobilization
varyaccordingtogeographicregion,politicalideology,andtheprofessionoftheparticipant.
Theoptoutmovementisaboutmorethanjustoppositiontohighstakestesting.Respondents
gavemanyreasonsastowhytheyparticipate.Inparticular,respondentsfeelthatjudging
teacherperformancebystudentsstandardizedtestscoresisunfair(36.9percent).Theyalsoare
protestingthenarrowingofthecurriculum,corporatization/privatizationofeducation,andthe
implementationoftheCommonCoreStateStandards.
Motivationsvary,dependingonwhethertherespondentwasateacherornot.Teachers(45.0
percent)saythattheyareopposedtotyingteacherevaluationtostudentperformanceon
standardizedtestswhilenonteachersweremorelikelytomentionoppositiontoteachingto
thetestandtotheCommonCore.
Optoutactivistsareconcernedwithcurrenteducationalreformsandeffortstoimprove
publicschools.Comparedtothegeneralpublic,theyaremorecriticaloftheuseofdifferent
typesoftestingineducation,especiallyhighstaketests.Also,optoutactivistsviewincreasing
schoolfundsasimportantideaforimprovingschools.Whilethegeneralpublicrankthisideain
the4thplace(outoffive),optoutactivistsrankthisideainthe2ndplace.
Introduction
AssessmenthaslongbeenaninextricablepartofschoolingintheUnitedStates.Beingabletoevaluate
whetherstudentshaveunderstoodandmasteredassignedknowledgeandskillsis,afterall,oneofthe
coreeffortsofthemoderneducationalproject.Butrecentlyassessmentisbackintheheadlinesasahot
buttonissueinAmericaneducationpolitics.Asscholarshavepointedout,theusesofachievementtests
havechangeddramaticallyduringthepastseveraldecades,asassessmentshavemovedfrombeing
predominantlylowstakesdiagnostictoolsofstudentlearningtohighstakesexerciseswithsignificant
consequencesattached.1Lately,standardizedassessmentsthatis,thoseteststhatareuniformintheir
questions,administrationandscoringhavemadeheadlinesasasourceofconsternationand
complaintwithintheAmericanpublic.Unhappywithfederallegislationthatmandatesannual
standardizedassessments,increasingnumbersofcitizenshaverefusedtohavetheirchildrensitforthe
tests.Theseeffortshavecometobeknownastheoptoutmovement.
Althoughreportssurfacedintheearly2000sofstudentsinselectaffluentcommunitiesboycotting
standardizedtests,2thedatashowadramaticuptickintestrefusalduringthepast34years.Thoughit
isbeyondthescopeofthisreporttodeterminethecausalfactorsbehindtheriseoftheoptout
movement,twocontextualfactorscertainlycreatedanenvironmentripeforprotest.First,theCommon
CoreStateStandards(CCSS)anditsalignedassessmentswererolledout,andthefederalgovernment
incentivizedstatestoadoptthestandardsthroughitscompetitiveRacetotheTopgrantprogram.Race
totheTopalsoencouragedstatestojoinoneormoreofthenewassessmentconsortiathatwere
developingCCSSalignedassessments.Veryquickly,45statesandtheDistrictofColumbiahadsignedon
toboththenewstandardsandthenewassessments.Second,manystatesanddistrictswereimposing
newconsequencesforteachers,principalsandschoolswhosestudentswerenotdemonstrating
increasedlevelsofachievement.3InsomestatestheCCSSalignedassessmentswereintroduced
simultaneouslytonewteacherevaluationsystemsthatrequiredthatstudentperformancedatafrom
thenewassessmentsbeusedtoevaluateteacherperformanceandeffectteacherpay.Someinthe
See,forexample,Koretz,D.M.(2008).Measuringup.HarvardUniversityPress.
Zernike,K.(13April,2001).InhighscoringScarsdale,arevoltagainststatetests.TheNewYorkTimes.
3
Foranoverviewaswellasadiscussionofthewithdrawalofstatesfromthetwotestingconsortia,seeJochim,A.
&McGuinn,P.(2016).ThePoliticsoftheCommonCoreAssessments.EducationNext,16(4):XXXX.
statesexpressedconcernsaboutfederaloverreachsomecalledithijacking4ingettingstatesto
adoptthestandards.
Withinthiscontextofupheavalinthek12educationsystem,mediabeganreportingonanincreasing
backlashagainstannualstandardizedassessments.In2012,reportssurfacedthatcertainschoolswere
boycottingthefieldtestingofthenewCorealignedassessments.Someparentsweresaidtobe
concernedaboutteachersspendingclasstimeteachingtothetest;otherswerepurportedlytroubled
aboutdatagatheringandprivacyconcerns.FormerSecretaryforEducationArneDuncanfamously
dismissedthebacklashaswhitesuburbanmomswhoallofasuddentheirchildisntasbrilliantas
theythoughttheywere,andtheirschoolisntquiteasgoodastheythoughttheywereinlightof
studentsplummetingscoresonCorealignedassessments.5
Othereducationofficialsfollowedsuit.TheEducationCommissionerinNewJerseycalledtheoptout
movementasuburbanphenomenonthatsgoingtobecounterproductivetohelpingdisadvantaged
kids.6Unionsjumpedintothefray,movingfromsupportingtheCCSStovehementlyopposingthenew
assessments.Opponentswerevociferousintheirhostilityintyingstudentperformanceonthe
assessmentstoteacherevaluations.Opponentswerereportedassayingthatthenewstandardizedtests
werecausingstressforstudents,eatingupinstructionaltimeforteachers,andnarrowingthe
curriculum.Supportersweresayingthattheassessmentsprovidedusefulinformationabout
achievementgapsbetweenpoorandbetteroffstudents.TheUSDepartmentofEducationwarnedof
potentialsanctions,7indecreasedfundinglevelsandincreasedmonitoring,forthosestatesthatfell
undera95percentparticipationthreshold.Indistrictswhereleadershipsupportedoptingout,the
numbersrefusingtestsclimbed.8
Basedonvariousmediaaccount,theoptoutmovementseemtobeacombinationofunusualpolitical
bedfellows.Thoseontherightwerereportedtobeupsetaboutafederaloverreachintoeducation,an
Banchero,S.(3Jun32010).StatescraftschoolgoalsEducationguidelinesbackedbygovernorsgroupstirs
debateonlocalcontrol.TheWallStreetJournal.A3.
5
Strauss,V.(16November,2013).TheAnswerSheetblog.TheWashingtonPost,onlineedition.
6
Brody,L.(23February2015).NJbattlegroundovertestsofficialsworryaboutstudentsoptingoutasteachers
unionairsadscastingdoubtonexams.TheWallStreetJournal,A19.
7
Brody,L.(11April2015).NYteachersrebeloverstudenttestsunionrobocallremindsmembersthatstudents
canoptout;chancellorfindsmovedisturbing.TheWallStreetJournal.A15.
8
Brody,L.(15April2015).NYtestingisputtothetest.TheWallStreetJournal.A15.
arenathathashistoricallybeenthepurviewofthestates,whilethoseontheleftprotestedthatthe
assessmentregimewassimplyabusinessopportunityfortheassessmentcompaniesandonemorestep
ontheroadtoprivatizationoftheeducationsystem.
Thoughsoccermomswerethedemographicmostoftencitedatthecoreoftheoptoutmovement,
theresearchonwhowasactuallyinvolvedinthemovementislimitedandhasreliedonaggregateddata
asreportedbydistrictsandstatesforitsanalysis.Forexample,Chingosexploresthesocialbackground
ofstudentswhooptoutandfindsthatoptoutratesinNewYorkareassociatedwithsocioeconomic
statusandtestscores.9Heshowsthatrelativelyaffluentdistrictstendtohavehigheroptoutratesthan
thosewithlargerpopulationsofdisadvantagedstudents.Healsoshowsthat,aftertakingsocioeconomic
statusintoaccount,lowerperformingdistrictshadhigheroptoutratesbetween2014and2015,
suggestingthatperhapsdistrictadministratorsand/orparentswereencouragingoptingouttomask
poorperformance.Inametareviewofexistingoptoutstudies,Bennettfindsthatoptoutratesare
highlyvariableacrossstates,districts,andgrades.10InCaliforniatheoptoutratein2015withinall
gradestestedinEnglishlanguageartsandmathwas3percent,whereasinNewYorkstatetheoverall
optoutratewas20percent.Thereviewconfirmsthatresearchtodatehasfoundthatoptingoutis
morelikelyamongwhitesandeconomicallyadvantagedfamilies.
Pastresearch
Thereissomeresearchthathaslookedpublicperceptionsoftestingandtheoptoutmovement.Here,
theresultsaremixed.Resultsfromthe2015EdNextpollsuggestthattwothirdsofthepublic(67
percent)supportscontinuingthefederalrequirementofannualtesting.Slightlymorethanonefifth(21
percent)opposethispolicy.11Thepercentagesofsupportersandopponentsofannualassessmentare
bothslightlyhigherin2015thantheywerein2012,whilethepercentageofthosetakinganeutral
positionhasdeclined.TheEdNextpollreportslowpublicsupportforoptingout.Onlyonequarter(25
percent)ofrespondentslikestheideaoflettingparentsdecidewhethertheirchildrenaretested,while
threefifths(59percent)opposeit.Resultsfromthe2015PhiDeltaKappa(PDK)/Galluppolloffera
differentview.12Inthatsurvey,twofifths(41percent)ofthepublicandclosetohalfofpublicschool
http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2015/06/18chalkboardwhooptsoutchingos
Bennett,R.E.(2016).Optout:Anexaminationofissues.ETSResearchReportSeriesISSN23308516.
doi:10.1002/ets2.12101
11
http://educationnext.org/2015ednextpollschoolreformoptoutcommoncoreunions/
12
http://pdkpoll2015.pdkintl.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/10/pdkpoll47_2015.pdf
10
10
parents(47percent)saidtheysupporttherighttooptout.Publicsupportforoptout,however,varies
byrace.WhiterespondentsweremorelikelytosupportparentsrighttooptoutthanBlack
respondents.PDK/Gallupfoundthatclosetoonethird(31percent)ofpublicschoolparentsindicated
theywouldexcusetheirchildfromtakingoneormorestandardizedtests.
Yettoourknowledgenoonehasaskedtheprotestersthemselveswhytheyareoptingout,orwhatthey
hopetoaccomplishindoingso.Thisstudyaddressesthisgapbygoingdirectlytothoseintheoptout
movementandasksthefollowingresearchquestions:
Whooptsout?
Howdoparticipantsbecomeinvolvedandwhatdotheydo?
Whydopeopleparticipate?
Whatdoparticipantsthinkabouteducationalpolicy?
Conceptualframework
Thisstudyisinformedbypreviousresearchonsocialmovements,whichspeakstothewaysinwhich
groupsmobilizetopursuetheirsharedinterests.Forthepurposeofthisstudywedefinesocial
movementsascollectivitiesactingwithsomedegreeoforganizationandcontinuityoutsideof
institutionalororganizationalchannelsforthepurposeofchallengingordefendingextantauthority,
whetheritisinstitutionallyorculturallybased,inthegroup,organization,society,culture,orworld
orderofwhichtheyarepart.13Thisbroaddefinitionappliesnicelytothecaseofoptingout:parents
acrossthecountrytakepartincollectiveaction;national,state,andlocaloptoutorganizationsprovide
informationandcoordination;andactivistspursuetheirobjectivesmainlythroughnoninstitutional
meansanddisruptionofaccustomedpractices(e.g.,standardizedtests).
Researchonsocialmovementsexploreswhysocialmovementsform,whoparticipatesinthemandthe
facilitatingconditionsunderwhichsuchmovementsoperate.Scholarshipshowsthattheabilityofsocial
movementstocreatechangedependsonthreefactors:(1)theabilitytomobilizeresources;(2)changes
inpoliticalorinstitutionalopportunitystructures,and(3)howthedemandsofthemovementare
framedandcommunicatedtopotentialparticipants.Inthisstudy,wefocusmostlyonresource
13
Snow,D.A.,Soule,S.A.,&Kriesi,H.(2004).Mappingtheterrain(316).TheBlackwellcompaniontosocial
movements.JohnWiley&Sons.
11
ofnetworksandmediain
mobilizatiionparticularlythesociaalbaseofthemovementaandtheroleo
mobilizinggindividualsttotakepartin
noptoutactiivism.
entisimportaantforatleassttworeason
ns.First,the
Exploringthesocialbaseoftheopttoutmoveme
ovideawindoowintothereesourcestheyybringtothe
sociodemographiccharacteristicsofactivistspro
movemen
nt.Thesereso
ourcesaretyp
picallydescrib
bedashumann,social,andculturalcapittal.Forexample,
teachersb
bringprofessionaleducationalexpertisseregardingttheusefulnessofassessmeentsinschools.
Second,th
hesociodemo
ographiccharracteristicsoffactivistscannshedlighton
nclassintereststhatguidee
theirparticipation.Succhananalysisscanalsohelp
prevealtheeextenttowhichthemovem
mentis
representtativeoftheggeneralpublicc.
oftheoptouttmovement,wefollowth
heworkof
Inordertoexaminetheseissuesinthecontexto
Klandermansonthedyynamicsofmovementparrticipation.14FFigure1outlinesourapproachto
mobilizatiion.Thefirststepinvolvessindividualsh
hearingabouttoptout.Weeareinteresteedinthetimiing
andsourcceofthefirstencounterw
withthemovement.Theseecondstepco
oncernsthesttructuresand
d
networksthatrecruitindividualsforaction.Give
enthebackgrroundofthem
movement,w
weexpecttoffind
entgroups.Th
hethirdstepdifferentiateesbetweenm
motivationsan
ndmodesof
variationacrossdiffere
nd/orotherfo
ormsofcivicparticipation..
activism:optingoutan
ptout
Figure1:Threestepsttowardparticcipationinop
Hearing
H
about
optout
o
Mob
bilization
n
toaction
Deciisionto
takeeaction
14
Klanderm
mans,B.(1984
4).Mobilization
nandparticipation:Socialpssychologicalexxpansionsofresourcemobilizzation
theory.Am
mericanSociolo
ogicalReview,49(5):583600
0.
Klanderm
mans,B.(2004)).Thedemandandsupplyofparticipation: Socialpsychologicalcorrelattesofparticipaation
insocialmovements(360
0379).TheBla
ackwellcompa
aniontosocialm
movements.Jo
ohnWiley&So
ons.
12
Methodology
Theresultspresentedherearebasedonasurveyofadults(age18yearsandolder)administeredfrom
January20,2016throughMarch31,2016.ThesurveywasadministeredelectronicallyviaQualtrics
surveysoftware.TheresearchstudywasapprovedbytheInstitutionalReviewBoardofTeachers
College,ColumbiaUniversity(protocol#16089).Respondentswerepresentedwithdetailedstudy
informationsheetthatwasfollowedbyaconsentform.ThefinalsurveywasavailableinbothEnglish
andSpanish.Thestudyreceivednofundingfrompublicorprivatesources.
Becausethereislimitedresearchontheoptoutmovement,wedrewonarangeofsourcestoinform
thesurvey,includingscholarlyresearch,mediacoverage,materialsandartifactsproducedbyindividuals
andorganizationsaffiliatedwiththemovement,andconsultationswithkeyinformants.Someitems
weretakendirectlyfromexistingpublicopinionsurveys(PDK/GallupandEdNext)thathadpreviously
askedrespondentsaboutstandardizedassessmentand/oroptingout.Thefinalsurveyprobedthree
broadareas.Thefirstsectiongathereddataonparticipantengagementwiththeoptoutmovement:
theirsourcesofinformation,reasonsforparticipation,andmodesofactivism(optingoutand/orother
formsofcivicparticipation).Thesecondsectionfocusedonattitudestowardeducationpolicyreform,
andtheuseoftestingandassessmentineducation.Thethirdsectiongathereddataonsocio
demographicinformation(e.g.,sex,race/ethnicity,age,education,andplaceofresidence),political
views,partisanidentification,andorganizationalmembershipandaffiliations.Acopyofthefullsurvey
canbefoundinAppendix1.
Similartopreviousresearchonsocialmovementactivism,anonprobabilitysampleofindividuals
affiliatedwiththeoptoutmovementwasobtainedthroughoptoutgroupsandtheirsocialmedia
platforms.Tominimizesamplingbias,alistofnational,stateandlocalgroupsthatmaintainsocialmedia
channelswasconstructedfromwebbasedqueries.Afterreceivingpermissionfromthevariousgroup
administrators,surveysweresharedelectronicallythroughthegroupsandtheirsocialmediaplatforms.
ThisincludedpostinglinkstothesurveyonFacebookandTwitter.Inaddition,surveysweresharedwith
colleaguesandotherindividualswhoareactiveinthemovement.Toexpandthereachofthesurvey,
messages/postsaboutthesurveyincludedhashtagssuchas#optoutand#optout2016.Thenational
organizationUnitedOptOuthelpeddistributethesurveytostateandlocalchapters.Linkstothesurvey
werealsosenttootherorganizationswitharequesttopostthelinkonorganizationalwebsites.
13
Thestudyhasseverallimitations.First,datacollectionwasconductedexclusivelyonline.Therefore
individualswithoutaccesstotheInternetwerelesslikelytohavetheopportunitytoparticipateinthe
survey.AswithpreviousresearchonthedigitaldivideintheUnitedStates,itisreasonabletoassume
thatindividualsresidinginrurallocations(especiallyintheSouthandSouthwest)and/orindividuals
withlowerlevelsofeducationandincomemaybeunderrepresentedinthesample.Second,because
datacollectionwasfacilitatedthroughoptoutgroupsthathaveanonlinepresence,groupswithoutan
onlinepresencewerelesslikelytohavetheopportunitytoparticipateinthesurvey.Third,thestudyis
basedonselfreportedbehavior(e.g.,optingout),whichissubjecttoresponsebias.
Nevertheless,webelievethestudycontributestothegrowingbodyofknowledgeabouttheoptout
movementbydirectlysurveyingindividualsinvolvedinthemovement.Thetotalnumberofrespondents
was2,140.Afteraccountingfornonresponse,theanalyticalsamplesizeis1,641respondents.In
additiontopresentingaggregatedescriptivestatisticsfordifferentoutcomevariables,wealsopresent
predictedprobabilitiesfordifferentgroups(e.g.,regionandpoliticalviews).Predictedprobabilitiesare
calculatedfrommultivariateanalysis(e.g.,logisticandmultinomiallogisticregression)withthefollowing
controlvariables:sex,race/ethnicity,age,householdincome,education,employmentstatus,political
ideology,andregion.AnalysiswasdoneinStata14.
14
WhoOptsOut?
Table1presentsademographicoverviewofthewholesample.Themajorityoftherespondentswere
women(85.4percent);slightlymorethanonetenth(11.5percent)weremen,andtherestself
identifiedasothergender(3.1percent).Theaverageagewas35years(standarddeviation=7.9).The
vastmajorityofthesample(91.8percent)waswhite,withthesecondlargestracial/ethnicgroupbeing
Latino/Latina(4.9percent).Asmallminority(4.2percent)identifiedaslesbian,gay,bisexual,or
transgender.Mostrespondents(86.1percent)weremarriedorlivingwithapartner.Lessthanone
tenth(8.3percent)wasdivorcedorseparated,andtherestofthesamplewasnevermarriedorwas
widowed(4.5percentand1.0percent,respectively).Also,aboutfourfifthsoftherespondents(81.5
percent)wereparentsorguardiansofschoolagechildren.
Table1AboutHere
Overall,thesampleconsistedofmostlyrespondentswithahighsocioeconomicstatus,asreflectedin
commonindicatorsofeducation,laborforceparticipation,andhouseholdincome.Respondents
reportedhavinghighlevelsofformaleducation:Almostallrespondentshadpostsecondaryeducation
(97.8percent).Threefifthsofthesample(59.7percent)heldagraduatedegree,onefourth(25.4
percent)heldabaccalaureatedegree,andapproximatelyoneeighth(12.7percent)heldanassociates
degreeorsomeyearsofcollege.
Fourfifthsofthesample(80.5percent)workedforpay,workinganaverageof43.2hours/perweek
(standarddeviation=14.1).Abouthalfoftherespondents(45.0percent)workasteachersoreducators,
withmajorityofthembeingparentsorguardiansofschoolagedchildren(71.1percent).Additionally,
aboutonesixthofrespondents(16.0percent)reportedthattheyhaveteachersoreducatorsintheir
closecircleoffriends.Takentogether,thesemeasuressuggestthatapproximatelytwothirdsof
respondents(64.8percent)havehaddirectcontactwiththeteachingprofession.
Themedianhouseholdincomeinthesurveywas$125,000,muchhigherthanthemedianhousehold
incomefortheUnitedStateswhich,accordingtotheAmericanCommunitySurvey,was$53,657in2014,
thelatestdataavailable.
Politically,halfofthesample(50.6percent)identifiedasliberal,aboutonethird(31.5percent)
identifiedasmiddleoftheroad,andlessthanonefifth(17.9percent)asconservative.Similarpatterns
15
emergedwhenweexaminedpartisanidentification.Closetohalfofthesample(46.1percent)identified
asDemocrats,oneseventh(15.1percent)identifiedasRepublicans,onethird(33.3percent)identified
asIndependents,andtherest(5.5percent)wereaffiliatedwithotherparties(e.g.,theGreenParty,
LibertarianParty).15Almostallrespondentsvotedinthe2012presidentialelections(94.6percent).
Aboutonethirdofthesample(31.4percent)indicatedithasnoreligiousaffiliation.Amongthe
affiliatedrespondents,weidentifiedfourrelativelylargegroups:Catholics(25.4percent),Protestants
(17.4percent),otherChristians(13.5percent),andJews(7.9percent).Thesamplealsoincluded
respondentswhoidentifiedasBuddhist,Mormon,Muslim,UnitarianUniversalist,andSpiritual(each
representinglessthanonepercent).Aboutonefifth(17.5percent)ofrespondentsindicatedtheywere
livinginamultilingualhousehold,withthecommonlanguagesbeingSpanishandFrench.
Aboutfourfifthsoftherespondents(81.5percent)wereparentsorguardiansofschoolagedchildren.
Whenweaskedthoseparentswhatkindsofschoolstheirschoolagedchildrenattended,thevast
majorityofthem(92.9percent)indicatedthattheirchildrenattendedpublicschools.Twothirdsof
thoserespondents(65.8percent)saidtheirchildrenhaveattendedonlypublicschools.
Interestingly,almostonefifthofrespondents(19.5percent)didnothaveschoolagedchildren.Thusthe
optoutmovementconsistsofabroaderrangeofactiviststhanjustparentswhoopttheirchildrenoutof
tests.Themovementincludesparents,parentswhodonotoptout,andparentswhosechildrenarenot
inthepublicschoolsystem,aswellasnonparents.
Respondentscamefrom47states(allexcept:Alaska,Iowa,Wyoming,andWashingtonD.C.).As
reflectedinTable2,twothirdsofthesample(66.9percent)residedinsixstates:NewYork(34.7
percent),Florida(10.4percent),NewJersey(8.2percent),Oregon(5.5percent),Washington(4.7
percent),andCalifornia(3.5percent).16
Table2AboutHere
15
Intheanalysistofollowweusepoliticalideologywhenexaminingdifferencesbetweengroups.Inadditional
analysis(notreported)wealsousepartyidentification.Overall,thepatternsareverysimilar.
16
Ofthesesixstates,NewYork,Oregon,WashingtonandCaliforniawereidentifiedbytheDepartmentof
Educationashavinghadlowerthanrequiredparticipationratesonstateexams.
16
Inadditiontostateofresidence,respondentswereaskedabouttheirzipcode.Respondentsreported
on1,046uniquecodes,withonequarterofthesampleresidingin43differentcodes(eachincludedat
leastfourrespondents).Usinginformationfromthe2010Census,weclassifiedzipcodestothree
groups:urbanizedareas(50,000ormorepeople),urbanclusters(atleast2,500andlessthan50,000
people),andruralareas.17Mostrespondents(87.4percent)liveinurbanclusters.Anadditionalten
percentliveinurbanizedareasandasmallfractionliveinruralareas(2.6percent).
Inordertoexaminegeographicalvariationwithinthemovement,weclusteredstatesintofourregions:
Northeast,South,WestandMidwest.AsshowninFigure2,halfofthesample(49.5percent)residedin
theNortheast,andonefifthofthesample(20.1percent)residedintheSouth.18Thelarge
representationoftheNortheastregioninthesamplemaybeareflectionofthepreviousantitesting
activityintheearly2000s.
Figure2AboutHere
Statepoliciesaboutoptingoutvary.ArecentreportbytheNationalAssociationofStateBoardsof
Education(NASBE)categorizesstatesintofourgroupsbasedontheiroptoutpolicies:(1)optoutis
prohibited(34statesandWashingtonD.C.),(2)optoutispermittedcompletely(2states),(3)refusalis
permittedoroptoutispermittedwithconstraints(10states),and(4)optoutpolicyislefttolocal
districts.19UsingNASBEsclassification,themajorityoftherespondents(76.8percent)resideinstates
whereoptoutisprohibited.Thisgroupincludes,forexample,respondentsfromNewYorkandNew
Jerseywhereallstudentsareexpectedtotakestatetestsandabsencesfromtestsaremanagedin
accordancewithexistingattendancepolicies.Oneinsixrespondents(16.3percent)residesinstates
whererefusalispermittedoroptoutispermittedwithconstraints.Therestresideinstateswhereopt
outispermitted(5.7percent)orinstateswithoutstatelevelpolicy(1.2percent).
17
https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urbanrural2010.html
Theshareofrespondentswhoareparentsvariesacrossregions.IntheNortheastandtheSouth,85.7percent
and82.6percent(respectively)ofthesampleindicatedthattheyareparents.IntheMidwestandWest,78.8
percentand73.0percent(respectively)ofthesampleindicatedthattheyareparents.
19
http://www.nasbe.org/wpcontent/uploads/Lorenzo_OptoutsbyState.pdf
18
17
Howdoparticipantsbecomeinvolvedandwhatdotheydo?
Whenandhowdoparticipantsbecomeinvolved?
Althoughthereareaccountsshowingthattheoptoutactivismbeganintheearly2000s,most
respondentsreportedthattheyhaveheardaboutthemovementduringthepastfouryears.Asshown
inFigure3,halfofthesample(48.9percent)becameawareofoptingoutduringthepasttwoyears,and
approximatelytwofifthsofthesample(39.8percent)heardaboutthemovementinthepast34years.
Figure3AboutHere
Whenpeoplefirstheardaboutoptingoutvariesbyregion,education,andpoliticalviews.Overall,the
patternssuggestthatthemovementemergedintheNortheastandtheWest,amonghighlyeducated
andliberalindividuals:
Comparedtotheirpeersinotherpartsofthecountry,respondentsintheSouthhaveheard
aboutthemovementmostrecently(seeFigure4).AbouttwothirdsofrespondentsintheSouth
(64.5percent)reportedhearingaboutthemovementduringthepasttwoyears,whileslightly
morethantwofifthsofrespondentsintheNortheast(42.8percent)heardaboutthemovement
duringthisperiod.
Respondentswithhighereducation(bachelorsandgraduatedegrees)heardaboutthe
movementearlierthantheircounterpartswithlesseducation(seeFigure5).
Respondentsholdingliberalviewsweremorelikelytohaveknownaboutthemovementlonger
(fiveyearsagoorearlier)comparedtorespondentsholdingconservativeormiddleoftheroad
views(seeFigure6).
Figures4,5,6AboutHere
Mobilizationthroughnetworks
Socialmovementsmobilizeparticipantsthroughvariousmeans.Toidentifythesechannels,respondents
wereaskedhowtheyfirstheardaboutoptingout.AsshowninFigure7,twofifthsofthesample(38.8
percent)firstheardfromsocialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,blogs,etc.).Onefourth(24.6percent)first
heardfromteachersorothereducationprofessionals.Twoothercommonsourcesincludepersonal
networks:friends,neighbors,andrelatives(12.8percent)andotherparents(8.7percent).Traditional
mediaplayedamorelimitedroleinspreadingtheoptoutmessage;4.6percentfirstheardaboutopting
outfromtelevision,radio,andnewspapers(nationalmedia=3.0percent;localmedia=1.6percent).
Respondentswhowroteinanswersintheothercategory(5.2percent)indicatedthattheir
18
professionalbackgroundsandexperienceasteachersledthemtooptout.Asonerespondentwrote:I
amateacher,Iseethehorribletruthassociatedwithtesting.Anotherwrote:Iamateacherandknew
Ihadparentalrightsregardingmychildren'seducation.
Figure7AboutHere
Next,respondentswereaskedwhichsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadethemwanttoknowmore
aboutthemovementand/ortoparticipateinactivities.Theresponsetothisquestionechoesthe
patternsabove(seeFigure8).20Alargemajorityofthesample(69.8percent)weremobilizedbysocial
media.Theothermainsourceofmobilizationwassocialnetworks.Abouthalfofthesample(49.6
percent)wasmobilizedbyteachersorothereducationprofessionals,andslightlylessthanonethird
(31.1percent)saidtheyweremobilizedbyfriends,neighborsandrelatives.Aboutonequarterofthe
sample(24.6percent)weremobilizedbyotherparentsattheirchildsschool(24.6percent),andone
fifthofthesample(20.7percent)weremobilizedbypublicfigureororganization.Whiletraditional
mediaseemtohavealimitedroleinspreadingthemessageaboutthemovement,itplaysalargerrole
inmobilization,asonequarterofthesample(24.2percent)saidthattheyweremobilizedbytraditional
media.
Figure8AboutHere
Theroleofdifferentmobilizationsourcesvariesbyregion,politicalideology,andbelonging/proximityto
theteachingprofession:
RespondentsintheSoutharemorelikelytobemobilizedbysocialmedia(seeFigure8).
RespondentsintheMidwestandWestaremorelikelytobemobilizedbyteachersandother
educationprofessionals.RespondentsintheNortheastaremorelikelytobemobilizedbysocial
networks,includingfriends,neighborsorrelatives,andotherparentsattheirchildsschool.
Bothliberalsandconservativesaremorelikelytobemobilizedbysocialmediaandsocial
networks(seeFigure9).Additionally,liberalsaremorelikelytobemobilizedbyteachersand
othereducationprofessionals,andbypublicfiguresororganizations.
Teachersaremorelikelytobemobilizedbytheirprofessionalcommunity(i.e.,teachersand
othereducationprofessionals;seeFigure10).Otherrespondents,whoarenotteachers,are
morelikelytobemobilizedbytheirsocialnetworksandotherparentsattheirchildsschool.
Mobilizationthroughsocialmovementorganizations
20
Inthisquestionrespondentswereaskedtomarkallthatapply,sosumsmayexceed100percent.
19
Socialmovementsorganizations(SMOs)arecrucialinthemobilizationofparticipants.Inorderto
examinewhichSMOsareimportantandhowtheymightbeconnectedtoeachother,respondentswere
askedwhethertheywereevercontactedbyanorganizationtoparticipateinanyoptoutrelated
activities.Respondentswhoansweredpositivelywerethenaskedtowriteinallthenamesof
organizationsthatcontactedthemforanyoptoutrelatedactivities.
Onethirdofthesample(33.4percent)indicatedtheywerecontactedbyatleastoneorganizationand
respondentsidentified237differentorganizationsortypesoforganizationsintheirresponses.Thelist
includedeighttypesoforganizations:generaloptoutgroups(generic/national,state,andlocal),groups
affiliatedwiththeBadassTeachers(generic/nationalandstate),publiceducationrelatedgroups(e.g.,
NewYorkStateAlliesforPublicEducation,SaveOurSchools),otherparentgroups(e.g.,ParentTeacher
Association),teacherunions,testingrelatedgroups(e.g.,MorethanaScore),andCommonCore
relatedgroups(UnitedtoStopCommonCore),andothercivicorganizations(e.g.,LeagueofWomen
VotersandACLU).
Figure12presentsasocialnetworkoforganizationsinvolvedintheoptoutmovement.Eachnode
representsanorganizationthatcontactedindividualstoparticipateinanyoptoutrelatedactivities.The
colorofthenodedenotesthetypeoforganization.Twoorganizationsareconnectedwithalineinthis
networkiftheycontactedthesameindividualtoparticipateinanyoptoutrelatedactivities.Thelabels
ofthenodesarescaledinsizetothenumberofcontactstheyhavewithactivists;largerlabelsreflect
morecontacts.ThefigureisdrawnusingNetDrawinMultidimensionalScaling(MDS)layoutwithnode
repulsionandequaledgelengthbias.21Thisapproachputtwonodesclosertogetheriftheyaremore
similar(intermsoftheirconnectionstoothernodes).Thedistancesbetweennodesandthedirection
(orlocation)areinterpretable.
ExaminationofFigure12revealsthefourmostactiveorganizations:UnitedOptOut(andthe
unspecifiedlabeloptout),BadassTeachersAssociation(BATs),NewYorkAllianceforPublicEducation,
andLongIslandOptOut.22ThecentralityoforganizationsbasedinNewYorkStateisareflectionofour
samplecomposition(onethirdofallrespondentsarefromNewYorkState).Thecoreofthenetwork
includesoptoutrelatedgroups,BATs,andpubliceducationrelatedgroups(includingparentsgroups).
21
Borgatti,S.P.,Everett,M.G.,&Freeman,L.C.(2002).UCINETforWindows:Softwareforsocialnetworkanalysis.
BadassTeachersAssociation:http://www.badassteacher.org;
NewYorkAllianceforPublicEducation:http://www.nysape.org
22
20
Othergroupssuchasteachersunions,testingrelatedgroups,andCommonCorerelatedgroupsare
morelikelytoappearintheperipheryofthenetwork.Thisnetworksuggeststhatthecoreoftheoptout
movementconsistsofactivistsandorganizationsconcernedwithpubliceducationandtheteaching
profession.
Figure12AboutHere
Figure13presentsasocialnetworkoforganizationsthatcontactedtwoormoreindividualsto
participateinanyoptoutrelatedactivities.ThethicklinebetweenUnitedOptOutandBATssuggests
thattheseorganizationsoftenmobilizethesameindividuals.Amongthehighlyactiveorganizations,we
findonlytwoCommonCorerelatedgroups(StopCommonCoreNYSandWashingtonStateAgainst
CommonCore).
Figure13AboutHere
Whatdoactivistsdo?
Perhapsthemostobviousquestioninthesurveyaskedparentrespondentswhetherornottheyhad
optedtheirchildrenoutofanyassessments.Threequartersofparentsofschoolagechildren(74.5
percent)reportedoptingtheirchildrenoutofstandardizedtesting.Twothirdsofparentsofschoolage
children(63.3percent)optedoutalloftheirchildren,andapproximatelyonetenth(11.2percent)opted
outsomeoftheirchildren.
AsshowninFigure14,slightlymorethantwothirds(71.2percent)firstoptedoutinthepasttwoyears,
andapproximatelyonefourthofthesample(24.4percent)firstoptedoutinthepast34years.Further,
abouthalfofthesample(46.9percent)optedoutfromstandardizedtestingatthesametimetheyfirst
heardabouttheoptoutmovement.
Figure14AboutHere
Wealsofindthatoptingoutisassociatedwithgeographicregionandpolicycontext:
Whilehalfoftherespondents(52.0percent)intheSouthoptedout,aboutthreequartersofthe
respondentsinotherregionsoptedout(Northeast83.0percent,West81.0percent,
Midwest73.0percent).
Theshareofparentswhooptedoutislowerinstateswhereoptoutisprohibited(73.2percent)
thaninstateswhererefusalandoptoutarepermittedwithconstraints(85.7percent).
21
Nevertheless,thesepatternssuggestthatstatelawisnotenoughtodissuadeparentsfrom
optingout.Wefindnosignificantdifferencesinoptingoutbetweenrespondentsresidingin
stateswhereoptoutispermittedandotherrespondents.
Respondentsreportedonotherformsofactivismthatconnectedthemtothemovementwhilestopping
shortofactuallyoptingout.Whenrespondentswereaskedtoindicatewhatactionstheyhavetaken
relatingtooptingout,almostallrespondents(97.6percent)hadparticipatedinatleastoneactivity,and
halfofthesamplereportedparticipatinginsixormoreactivities.AsillustratedinFigure15,thefour
mostcommonformsofcivicparticipationwererelatedtodisseminatingthemessageofthemovement
andtryingtorecruitotherparticipants:respondentsreportedpostinginformationonsocialmedia(85.3
percent),discussingwithotherparentsinschool(81.6percent),joiningwebbaseddistributionlists
(73.6percent),andconvincingotherstogetinvolved(72.3percent).Otheractivitiesincludedsigninga
petition(69.4percent),contactingapoliticianorotherelectedofficial(66.0percent),andattendinga
demonstrationorprotest(35.5percent).
Figure15AboutHere
Futureactivity
ToassessthepotentialoftheoptoutmovementinAY2015/2016andinthecomingyears,respondents
wereaskedhowlikelyitisthattheywilloptouttheirchildreninthefuture.Thevastmajorityofthe
samplesaidtheywouldbeverylikely(82.8percent)orlikely(9.3percent)tooptoutinthefuture.
Importantly,aboutthreequartersofparentswhodidnotoptoutinthepast(74.5percent)saidthat
theyarelikelytooptoutinthefuture(verylikely45.5percentandlikely29.0percent).
Possiblequotesforsidebar:
Mychildisininsecondgradetooyoungtooptout.Butwewilloptoutnextyear
(Mother,NewJersey)
Heisonlytwoyearsold.Assoonasheisoldenoughforschool,mywifeandIwillbeopting
himoutofALLstandardizedtesting.Hewillnevertakeastandardizedtest.NEVER!
(Father,California)
22
Whydopeopleparticipate?
Acentralquestioninsocialmovementresearchiswhydopeopleparticipate?Toaddressthisquestion
inthecontextoftheoptoutmovement,respondentswereaskedtochooseuptofivereasonsfortheir
participation(outof16optionsincludingother,seeFigure16).Respondentswerethenaskedto
choosethemaintworeasonsfortheirparticipation(seeFigure17).Thetopsixreasonsforparticipation
were:Iopposeusingstudentsperformanceonstandardizedteststoevaluateteachers(36.9percent),
standardizedtestsforceteacherstoteachtothetest(33.8percent),Iopposethegrowingroleof
corporationsinschools(30.4percent),standardizedteststakeawaytoomuchinstructionaltime
(26.5percent),IopposetheCommonCoreStateStandards(25.8percent)andIopposethe
privatizationofschools(16.0percent).Mostofthesemotivations/reasonsreflectaprogressivecritique
ofthenegativeconsequencesofstandardizedtestingonschoolsandtheroleoftheprivatesectorin
publiceducation.
Figures16and17AboutHere
Respondentswhowroteinadditionalreasonsmostoftencitedoneofthreeconcerns.First,respondents
questionedthefairnessoftestsforstudentswithspecialneeds,forexample:[Iparticipateinorder]to
raiseawarenessaboutstudentswithdisabilities/learningdifferences.Thesetestsaretotallyunfairto
childrenwithlearningdifferences.Second,respondentspointedtoissuesofstudentprivacy,for
example:Transparencyinwhatdataiscollected,whohastheinfo,howwilltheyuseit?Third,
respondentsquestionedthevalidityandusefulnessofthetests:Thereisabsolutelynoproofthatany
ofthesetestshaveanyvaliditywhatsoeverandshouldnotbeuseduntilanycorrelationsareshown
betweengradelevellearningandunderstandingandthesetests.
Thereweresignificantdifferencesinmotivationforparticipationacrosspoliticalideology,aspresented
inFigure18A:
Liberalsandmiddleoftheroadrespondentsweremorelikelytomention:Iopposeusing
studentsperformanceonstandardizedteststoevaluateteachersandIopposethegrowing
roleofcorporationsinschools(36percentand33percent)
Conservativesweremorelikelytomention:IopposetheCommonCoreStateStandardsandI
opposethegrowingroleofthefederalgovernment(45percentand22percent).
Figure18AAboutHere
23
Thereweresimilarsignificantdifferencesinmotivationforparticipationacrosspartylines,aspresented
inFigure18B:
DemocratsandIndependentsweremorelikelytomention:Iopposeusingstudents
performanceonstandardizedteststoevaluateteachers(38.8percentand35.9percent)andI
opposethegrowingroleofcorporationsinschools(30.8percentand29.6percent)
RepublicansandIndependentsweremorelikelytomention:IopposetheCommonCoreState
Standards(35.8percentand26.2percent);Republicansandrespondentssupportingother
partiesweremorelikelytomention:Iopposethegrowingroleofthefederalgovernment
(16.8percentand18.3percent).
Figure18BAboutHere
Inaddition,thereweresignificantdifferencesinmotivationsandreasonsforparticipationbetween
teachersandnonteachers,aspresentedinFigure19:
TeachersweremorelikelytomentionIopposeusingstudentsperformanceonstandardized
teststoevaluateteachers,Iopposethegrowingroleofcorporationsinschools,andI
opposetheprivatizationofschools.
Nonteachersweremorelikelytomentionstandardizedtestsforceteacherstoteachforthe
test,standardizedteststakeawaytoomuchinstructionaltime,andIopposetheCommon
CoreofStateStandards.
Figure19AboutHere
Possiblequotesforsidebar:
Asaneducator,Iseetheendresultofincreasedtestinginprimaryeducationoverthelast
decadeandamappalledattheresultingdamagetestcenterededucationhasdone.Thereis
alsoagreatdegreeofconcernoverdatagatheringconductedviatesting.(Teacherresponse)
AsaprotestmovetoshowthatIdonotliketheamountoftimedevotedtotestprep.(Non
teacherresponse)
Asascientistmyself,Ididnothaveconfidenceinthereliabilityandvalidityofthemeasures
(Nonteacherresponse)
24
WhatdoparticipantsthinkaboutUSeducationpolicy?
WhilepoliticalparticipationintheUnitedStatesisgenerallyconsideredtobeinshortsupply,optout
activistsareselfidentifiedasparticipantsincivicandpoliticallife.Wewereinterestedtoseewhether
optoutactivistshadviewsoneducationpolicythatweresimilarto,ordifferentfrom,memberofthe
generalpublic.Inordertodoso,weincludedseveralitemsaboutviewsoneducationpolicyintheopt
outsurveythatweretakenfrompreviouslyfieldedpollsofthegeneralpopulation.Inthissection,all
comparisonsofoptoutactiviststothegeneralpublicaremadeusingpollingresultsfromprevious
PDK/Galluppolls.23
Evaluationofschools
ComparedtothegeneralpublicintheUnitedStates,optoutactivistshaveamorepositiveviewof
schoolsintheirowncommunity(seeFigure20).Morethantwothirdsofoptoutactivists(68percent)
gavetheirschoolsagradeofeitherAorB(25percentand43percent),whileabouthalfofAmericans
(51percent)gaveschoolsagradeofeitherAorB(13percentand38percent,respectively).Theretwo
possibleexplanationsforthispattern.First,thequalityofpublicschoolsintheUnitedStatesisclosely
linkedtolocalpropertytaxes.Withthemajorityoftherespondentsbeingmiddleanduppermiddle
classfamilies,itispossiblethattheyhaveaccesstogoodpublicschoolsandthustheirpositive
evaluation.Second,thehighevaluationofschoolmightbeseenasarejectionofthecurrentnarrativeof
failingpublicschoolsthatisusedtojustifyeducationalreformsinthepastthreedecades.
Figure20AboutHere
Supportfordifferenttypesoftesting
Asexpected,optoutactivistsaremorecriticaloftheuseofdifferenttypesoftestingineducationthan
thegeneralpublicintheUnitedStates(seeFigure21).Nevertheless,evenamongoptoutactiviststhere
isconsiderablesupportforsomekindoftestsandevaluation.Morethanthreequartersofrespondents
supportteststhatareusedtoawardhighschoolstudentscollegecredit,suchasAPexams,andtests
thatareusedtodeterminewhetherachildhasmasteredacertainbodyofcurricularcontent(76
percentand74percent,respectively).However,therearelowerratesofsupportforothertypesof
23
ThePDK/GalluppollisanannualpublicopinionsurveyofAmericanadultsconductedusingtelephoneandweb
basedsurveymethodstocollectdata.ParticipantsaredrawnfromtheGallupPanel,aproprietary,probability
basedlongitudinalpanelofU.S.adults.Dataareweightedtomatchnationaldemographicsofgender,age,race,
Hispanicethnicity,education,andregion.
25
tests,includingcollegeentrancetests(51percent),teststhatdetermineifthestudentshouldbe
promotedfromonegradetothenext(30percent).
Figure21AboutHere
Howcanschoolsbeimproved?
ThegeneralpublicintheUnitedStatesandoptoutactivistsagreethatthequalityofteachersmatters
mostforpubliceducation(seeFigure22).Thisapproachisendorsedbyavastmajorityofthegeneral
public(95percent),whereasaslightlylowerpercentage(82percent)ofoptoutactivistsendorsethis
approach.Withrespecttotheuseofeducationalstandardstoimproveeducation,67percentofthe
generalpublicsupportstheuseofstandards,while53percentofoptoutactivistssupporttheuseof
standards.ComparedtothegeneralpublicintheUnitedStates,optoutactivistsviewschool
finance/budgetasamoreimportantideaforimprovingpubliceducation(66percentand45percent
support,respectively).Importantly,bothgroupsrejectstandardizedtestingasapolicysolutionfor
improvingschools(only19percentofthegeneralpublicand6percentofoptoutactivistssupportthis
idea).
Figure22AboutHere
Howshouldschoolsevaluatestudentsacademicprogress?
Theoptoutmovementchallengesatakenforgrantedpracticeofevaluatingstudentslearning:
standardizedtests.Thus,weaskedthemwhichotherapproachestheythinkcouldprovideaccurate
pictureofastudentsacademicprogress(seeFigure23).Amajorityofrespondents(90.0percent)
supportusingexamplesofstudentswork,andapproximatelyfourfifths(78.0percent)supportusing
writtenobservationsbyteachers(78.0percent).Slightlymorethanhalf(55.0percent)saythatgrades
awardedbyteacherscouldprovideaccuratepictureofastudentsacademicprogress.
Figure23AboutHere
Theroleofthegovernment:Federal,State,Local
Respondentswereaskedtoindicatewhichunitofthegovernmentfederal,state,localschoolboard
shouldhavethegreatestinfluenceonfiveeducationissuesink12publicschools.Optoutactivistsand
generalpublicholdsimilarviewswithrespecttopayingforthek12publiceducationsystem(seeFigure
24A).However,theyholddifferentviewswithrespecttofourotherissues;inallofthemoptout
activistsassignlessresponsibilitytothefederalgovernmentandmoreresponsibilitytostateandlocal
26
authorities.Thegapbetweenoptoutactivistsandthegeneralpublicareprofoundintwocases:holding
schoolsaccountableforwhatstudentslearn(seeFigure24C)anddeterminingtherightamountof
testing(seeFigure24D).Twothirdsofoptoutactivists(67percent)saythatthelocalschoolboard
shouldberesponsibleforholdingschoolsaccountable,butonlyonethirdofthegeneralpublic(33
percent)agreeswiththisdirection.Similarly,fourfifthsofoptoutactivists(80percent)saythatthe
localschoolboardshouldberesponsiblefordeterminingtherightamountoftesting,butonlyonethird
ofthegeneralpublic(33percent)agreeswiththisdirection.
Figure24AboutHere
Twointerestingpatternsemergewhenweexamineviewstowardtheroleofthegovernmentacross
politicalideology:
Liberalsandmiddleoftheroadrespondentsintheoptoutmovementaremorelikelythan
conservativestoviewthefederalgovernmentresponsibletothefollowingthreeissues:
o
Payingforthek12publiceducationsystem;
Decidingwhatistaughtintheschool;
Settingeducationalstandardsforwhatstudentsshouldknow.
Thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenliberals,conservatives,andmiddleoftheroad
respondentsinthelocusofresponsibilityofthefollowingissues:
o
Holdingschoolsaccountableforwhatstudentslearn;
Determiningtherightamountoftesting.
Perceptionsoftheimpactoftheoptoutmovement
Finally,weaskedtheoptoutactivistsiftheythoughttheiractionswerehavingapolicyimpact.A
majorityofrespondentsviewtheoptoutmovementashavinganimpactonbothfederalandstate
assessmentpolicy(seeFigure25).RespondentsintheNortheastaremorelikelytoviewtheoptout
movementashavinganimpact,especiallyonstateassessmentpolicy.Thispositivesentimentaboutthe
efficacyofthemovementismorecommonamongrespondentswhooptedoutandrespondentswho
arenotparents.
Figure25AboutHere
27
Conclusion
Whiletheoptoutmovementhasgeneratedintensemediainterestoverthepastseveralyears,the
identityoftheactivists,theirgoalsandmotivationsarenotwellunderstood.Inordertoaddressthis
gap,wedesignedandimplementedanationalsurveyonoptingoutofstandardizedtests.Thefindings
fromthesurveysuggestthatthemovementisperhapsmorecomplexthanpreviouslyunderstood.In
thislastsection,webrieflyrecapanddiscusssomeoftheresultsandraisequestionsforfurther
research.
Whooptsout?Themovementiscomprisedofmorethanjustparentswhooptout,italsoincludes
parentswhodidnotoptoutandindividualswhoarenotparents.Almostonefifthofrespondentswere
notparents.Coupledwiththoserespondentswhoareparentsbutwhosechildrendonotattendpublic
schoolsandthoseparentswhosechildrenaretooyoungtobetested,weseethattheoptout
movementisaboutmuchmorethansimplyoptingoutoftesting.Respondentsarenotsimply
concernedwiththeirchildrennotscoringwellonthetestsonly4.9percentofrespondentswere
concernedabouttestperformance.
Thesocialbaseofthemovement,however,isnarrow.Thevastmajorityofsurveyrespondentsare
white,middleclass,highlyeducatedparentswhohavechildreninthepublicschoolsystem.These
participantshavetheresourcestodevotetimeandenergytoactivism.Thedemographicsresultsecho
thedominantnarrativeinthenewsmediaaswellasthoseofpreviouspublicopinionsurveys,inwhich
nonwhiterespondentsaremoresupportiveoftheuseofstandardizedtests.24Theseresultsbegthe
questionofwhethernonwhiterespondentsareadequatelyrepresentedinthesampleorwhetherthe
samplereflectsacleavagealongraciallines.Indeed,leadingcivilrightsorganizationshavecomeout
stronglyinsupportofstandardizedassessmentsascriticaltomeasuringdisparitiesinstudent
performanceandasatoolofaccountability,especiallyforschoolsthatservelowincomestudentsand
studentsofcolor.
Teachersandeducators,butnecessarilyteachersunions,playacentralroleinthemovement,
comprising45.0percentofrespondents.Ontheonehand,thissuggeststhattheclaimsoftheprotesters
areheavilyrootedintheprofessionalexpertiseofteachersandeducators,whichshouldlegitimizethe
24
PDK/Gallup2014and2015
28
stancesofthemovement.Ontheotherhand,teachersthemselvesareopposedtonewmodelsof
evaluationthatarebasedonstudentsperformanceonstandardizedtests(modelsthathavebeen
criticizedbyvariousacademicgroups).Thus,theirparticipationinthemovementcouldbeseenasa
responsetothegrowingpressureofaccountability.
Asalowerstatus,highlyfeminizedprofession,teacherexpertiseisoftendisregardedinthepolicy
makingprocess.Indeed,whenrespondentswroteinadditionalcommentsonthesurvey,theyoften
usedlanguageaboutgettingteachersandeducatorstothepolicymakingtable.Forexample,a
respondentfromCaliforniawrote:Ibelievethereissomeroleforstateandfederalgovernmentto
guideandmonitorstudentlearning,butitiscurrentlybeingdonevery,verybadly.Ithinkexpertsinthe
fieldofeducation,andnotpoliticians,shouldberesponsibleforshapingpolicy.
Howdoactivistsbecomeinvolvedandwhatdotheydo?Socialmediaisthemainchannelthrough
whichactivistslearnabouttheoptoutmovementandbecomemobilizeforaction.Thischannelis
especiallyimportantforthosewhohavelimitedconnectionstoteachersandeducatorsandtothose
whoresideinareaswheretheprotestisstillsmall(e.g.,theSouth).Thecentralroleofsocialmediaisa
clearstrength,butgiventhedigitaldivideintheUnitedStatesoverrelianceonsocialmediamightlimit
thepossibilitiesforrecruitment.
Whydoactivistsparticipate?Thatthemovementisaboutmorethanoppositiontotestingisborneout
inthesurveyresultsinotherways,whererespondentsexpressedtheiroppositiontoawholerangeof
educationpoliciesandapproaches.Theoptoutmovementisnotonlyaforumtogivevoicetoconcerns
abouttheroleofstandardizedassessmentinAmericaneducation.Theoptoutmovementisalsoa
proxyforthelargerconflictsaroundthedirectionofeducationpolicy.Indeed,alargeshareofthe
samplesaidtheytakepartinthemovementbecausetheyopposethegrowingroleofcorporationsin
schoolsandbecausetheyopposetheCCSS.25
Whatdoactiviststhinkabouteducationalpolicy?Respondentscallforlessrelianceonstandardized
testsinschools.TheyarenotsupportiveofhighstaketestsinK12schools,butaresupportiveofcollege
relatedtests(i.e.,testsusestoawardhighschoolstudentscollegecreditandcollegeentrancetests).
25
ThisechoesthefindingsandlanguageofaterrificreportbytheConsortiumonPolicyResearchinEducation
(CPRE)onthebacklashagainsttheCommonCore.Seewww.hashtagcommoncore.com.
29
Largemajorityofrespondentsendorsealternativemodesofevaluationexamplesofstudentswork
andwrittenobservationsbyteachersasprovidinganaccuratepictureofstudentsacademicprogress.
Beyondspecificpolicy,optoutactivistsviewthegovernment(stateandfederal)asresponsiblefor
payingforK12publiceducationandforsettingeducationalstandards,andthelocalschoolboardas
responsiblefordecidingaboutthecurriculum,holdingschoolaccountable,anddeterminingtheright
amountoftesting.
Surveyrespondentsbelievethattheyarehavinganimpactthroughtheiroptoutactivism,andmostof
themsaythattheyareimpactingpolicy.Indeed,boththeDemocraticandRepublicanpartyplatforms
forthe2016presidentialelectionincludelanguageaboutstandardizedtesting.TheDemocraticplatform
wasrevisedtoincludelanguagethatsupportstheparentalrighttooptoutofstandardizedtesting,while
theRepublicanplatformpraisesthosestatesthatrejectexcessivetestingandteachingtothetest.26
Thetwolargestteachersunionsalsoopposehighstakestesting.Andevenwhenstatesoptoutpolicies
prohibitoptingout,protestersaregoingaheadandrefusinganyway.Whilenoneofthesetranslatesinto
specificpolicychange,takentogethertheysuggestthatattheveryleasttheoptoutmovementis
reshapingthepublicdiscourseabouttheroleofstandardizedtestinginpublicschools.
Thisstudyoffersafirstglimpseintotheperspectiveofoptoutactivists.Giventhepossibleeffectofthe
optoutmovementoncurrentreformmovement,moreresearchisneededonthistopic.Future
researchcoulddevelopinatleastthreedirections.First,scholarscoulduseindepthinterviewswith
leadersandactivistsinordertobetterunderstandthedecisionmakingprocessofparentsactivists
whentheyconsideroptingtheirchildrenfromstandardizedtests.Interviewswithactivistswhoare
racialandethnicminoritiescouldshedlightonthelackofdiversitywithinthemovementandthe
drivers/barriersthatshapethedemographiccompositionofthemovement.Second,scholarsacross
differentstatesandlocalitiescouldcollaborateinordertoextenddatacollectionusingquantitative
surveys.Thisapproachwillnotonlyincreasesamplesizeandcoverage,itwillalsoallowforcomparison
acrossstateswhereeducationalpoliciesandissuesvary(includingpoliciestowardparentalrighttoopt
out).
26
Democraticplatform:https://www.demconvention.com/platform/
Republicanplatform:https://www.gop.com/the2016republicanpartyplatform/
30
Table1:Sampledescription,byparentalstatus
Total
Parent(yes)
Gender*
Man
Woman
Other/Refused
Numberofchildren
Age*
Race/ethnicity
AmericanIndian/AlaskaNative
Asian
Black/AfricanAmerican
Hispanic,Latino,orSpanishorigin*
NativeHawaiian/PacificIslander
White/Caucasian*
Other
Sexualorientation
Heterosexual
LGBT
Refused
Maritalstatus*
Married/livingwithapartner
Widowed
Divorcedorseparated
Nevermarried
Religion
Catholic
Protestant
OtherChristian
Jewish
Unitarian
Otherreligion
Buddhism
Mormon
Non
Parents
(n=293)
(n=1,647)
81.5
11.5
85.4
3.1
35.00
(7.87)
1.1
1.3
1.9
4.9
0.1
91.8
2.8
87.8
4.2
8.0
86.1
1.0
8.3
4.5
25.4
17.4
13.5
7.9
1.3
1.2
0.5
0.5
Parents
(n=1,354)
14.9
83.4
1.7
42.50
(10.10)
2.0
1.7
.7
2.7
.3
94.9
1.3
85.2
6.7
8.1
67.9
2.4
14.1
15.5
23.5
21.1
6.5
6.8
2.0
1.4
1.0
0.7
10.7
85.8
3.5
2.04
(.87)
33.39
(6.25)
0.9
1.3
2.2
5.3
.
91.2
3.1
88.4
3.6
7.9
90.0
.7
7.1
2.2
25.9
16.6
15.0
8.2
1.1
1.1
0.4
0.5
31
Total
Non
Parents
Parents
ChristianOrthodox
0.3
0.3
0.3
Moslem/Islam
0.2
0.0
0.2
Nondenominational
0.1
0.3
0.1
Ihavenoreligiousaffiliation
31.4
35.7
30.4
Spiritual
0.3
0.7
0.2
*
Religiosity
2.09
1.98
2.13
(.99)
(.99)
(1.00)
Education*
Highschoolandless
2.2
1.0
2.4
Associatedegree/somecollege
12.7
1.4
15.2
Bachelorsdegree
25.4
16.6
27.2
Graduatedegree
59.7
81.0
55.2
Workforpay(yes)
80.5
87.4
79.0
Averagehoursperweek
49.62
41.70
43.25
(13.57)
(13.85)
(14.14)
Workineducationfield(yes)*
45.0
68.6
39.7
Income*
Below$50,000
8.2
12.6
7.2
Between$50,000and$74,999
15.4
22.7
13.8
Between$75,000and$99,000
20.8
21.7
20.6
Between$100,000and$149,999
28.4
25.9
28.9
Morethan150
27.3
17.1
29.5
*
Politicalideology
Liberal(13)
50.6
73.4
45.8
Middleoftheroad(4)
31.5
19.6
34.0
Conservative(57)
17.9
7.0
20.2
Politicalparty*
Democrat
46.1
57.2
43.8
Republican
15.1
6.5
16.9
Independent
33.3
33.3
33.4
Otherparties
5.5
3.0
5.9
Votedin2012Presidentialelections(yes)
94.6
95.6
94.4
Note:*Differencebetweenparentsandnonparentsisstatisticallysignificant(p<.05).Forcategorical
variables(e.g.,gender)weusedchisquaretest,andforcontinuousvariables(e.g.,age)weused
independentttest.
32
Table2:Respondentsbystates
State
Number
Alabama
6
Alaska
Arizona
4
Arkansas
1
California
59
Colorado
34
Connecticut
28
Delaware
5
Florida
176
Georgia
33
Hawaii
8
Idaho
2
Illinois
25
Indiana
47
Iowa
Kansas
4
Kentucky
10
Louisiana
9
Maine
12
Maryland
7
Massachusetts
18
Michigan
31
Minnesota
21
Mississippi
1
Missouri
2
Montana
2
Percent
0.4%
0.2%
0.1%
3.5%
2.0%
1.7%
0.3%
10.4%
1.9%
0.5%
0.1%
1.5%
2.8%
0.2%
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
0.4%
1.1%
1.8%
1.2%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
State
Nebraska
Nevada
NewHampshire
NewJersey
NewMexico
NewYork
NorthCarolina
NorthDakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
RhodeIsland
SouthCarolina
SouthDakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
WestVirginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
DistrictofColumbia
Number
2
5
2
140
21
588
14
6
50
9
93
40
8
3
1
15
13
5
2
38
79
2
15
Percent
0.1%
0.3%
0.1%
8.3%
1.2%
34.7%
0.8%
0.4%
2.9%
0.5%
5.5%
2.4%
0.5%
0.2%
0.1%
0.9%
0.8%
0.3%
0.1%
2.2%
4.7%
0.1%
0.9%
33
Figure2:Respondentsbygeographicregion
Midwest
12.2%
West
18.5%
Northeast
49.4%
Sotuh
20.0%
34
Figure3:Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?(Q7)
42.1%
39.8%
11.3%
6.8%
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
5yearsagoorearlier
35
Figure4:Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Byregion(Q7)
South
Midwest
10.1%
54.1%
6.8%
46.9%
West 5.3%
Northeast 4.5%
30.1%
37.7%
42.0%
38.3%
Withinthepastyear
41.8%
44.5%
12yearsago
34yearsago
5.8%
8.6%
10.8%
12.8%
5yearsagoorearlier
36
Figure5:Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Byeducation(Q7)
Graduatedegree 4.9%
11.7%
43.0%
40.4%
Bachelor'sdegree
6.4%
45.9%
38.6%
9.1%
Somecollege
6.5%
46.3%
38.3%
8.9%
Associatedegree
12.0%
Highschool
11.4%
26.6%
56.6%
27.7%
55.8%
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
4.8%
5.1%
5yearsagoorearlier
37
Figure6:Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?Bypoliticalideology(Q7)
Conservative
Middle
35.6%
49.1%
7.6%
40.2%
44.1%
5.9%
Liberal 5.3%
42.0%
41.7%
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
7.7%
9.9%
11.0%
5yearsagoorearlier
38
Figure7:Howdidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?(Q1)
Socialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,listserv,email)
38.8%
Teachersorothereducationprofessionals
24.6%
Friends,neighborsorrelatives
12.8%
Otherparentsatyourchild'sschool
8.7%
Other
5.2%
Media(TV,radio,newspaper)
4.6%
Publicfigureororganization
3.8%
Schoolcommunications
0.9%
Mychildrenortheirfriends
0.7%
39
Figure8:Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknowmore
aboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?(Markallthatapply;Q5)
Socialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,listserv,email)
69.8%
Teachersorothereducationprofessionals
49.6%
Friends,neighborsorrelatives
31.1%
Otherparentsatyourchild'sschool
24.6%
Media(TV,radio,newspaper)
24.2%
Publicfigureororganization
Mychildrenortheirfriends
Other
Schoolcommunications
20.7%
10.0%
9.9%
7.3%
40
Figure9:Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknowmore
aboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Byregion(Q5)
73%71%
69%68%
58%
56%
44%45%
35%
24%
27%27%
30%
21%
26% 24%
20% 21%
15% 13%
Socialmedia Teachersorother
(Facebook,
education
Twitter,listserv, professionals
email)
Friends,
neighborsor
relatives
South
Northeast
22% 23%
17%
13%
West
41
Figure10:Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknowmore
aboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Bypoliticalideology(Q5)
73%
71%
65%
53%
48%
40%
32%
31%
26%
23%21%
21%
23%24%25%
24%
15%16%
Socialmedia Teachersorother
(Facebook,
education
Twitter,listserv, professionals
email)
Friends,
neighborsor
relatives
Liberal
Middle
Conservative
42
Figure11:Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknowmore
aboutand/orparticipateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?Byteachersvs.nonteachers(Q5)
71% 70%
57%
42%
37%
32%
26%
24%
14%
Socialmedia Teachersorother
(Facebook,
education
Twitter,listserv, professionals
email)
Friends,
neighborsor
relatives
Others
22%
22%
17%
Teachers/Educators
43
Figure12:Networkoforganizationsintheoptoutmovement(Q19)
Legend:
Black=OptOutgroups(national,state,andlocal)
Green=BadassTeachers/BATS(national,state,andlocal)
Blue=Publiceducationrelatedgroups(e.g.,SaveOurSchools)andparentsgroups(e.g.,PTA)
Grey=Testingrelatedgroups(e.g.,MorethanaScore)
Purple=TeachersUnions(includingunspecifiedunions)
Red=Commoncorerelatedgroups(e.g.,UnitedtoStopCommonCore)
White=othergroups
44
Figure13:Networkofhighlyactiveorganizationsintheoptoutmovement(Q19)
Legend:
Black=OptOutgroups(national,state,andlocal)
Green=BadassTeachers/BATS(national,state,andlocal)
Blue=Publiceducationrelatedgroups(e.g.,SaveOurSchools)andparentsgroups(e.g.,PTA)
Grey=Testingrelatedgroups(e.g.,MorethanaScore)
Purple=TeachersUnions(includingunspecifiedunions)
Red=Commoncorerelatedgroups(e.g.,UnitedtoStopCommonCore)
White=othergroups
45
Figure14:Whendidyoufirstoptoutfromstandardizedtesting?(Q9)
37.2%
34.1%
24.4%
4.4%
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
5yearsagoorearlier
46
Figure15:Haveyouevertakenanyofthefollowingactionsrelatingtooptingout?(Markallthat
apply;Q12)
Postedonsocialmedia
85.3%
Discussedwithotherparentsinschool
81.6%
Joinedanemaillist,anonlinechatforum,orablog
73.6%
Triedtoconvinceotherstogetinvolved
72.3%
Signedapetition
69.4%
Contactedapoliticianorotherelectedofficial
66.0%
Attendedameeting
55.1%
Takenpartinademonstrationorprotest
35.5%
Donatedmoneytoasocialorpoliticalactivity
21.5%
Sentalettertotheeditortoanewspaper
CalledintoaliveradioorTVshow
Raisedmoneyforasocialorpoliticalactivity
Other
18.7%
13.4%
8.9%
6.5%
47
Figure16:Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout(Markuptofivereasons;Q23)
Iopposeusingstudentsperformanceon
82.3%
Iopposethegrowingroleofcorporationsinschools
73.1%
Standardizedtestsforceteacherstoteachtothetest
66.0%
Standardizedteststakeawaytoomuchinstructional
61.3%
IopposetheCommonCoreStateStandards
53.8%
Iopposetheprivatizationofschools
50.2%
Iopposethegrowingroleofthefederalgovernment
31.7%
Standardizedtestsareunfairforracial/ethnic
22.7%
Todisrupttheusageofstandardizedtests
11.5%
Mychildrencomplainedaboutstandardizedtests
6.5%
Toraiseawarenessaboutpubliceducation
6.0%
Other
5.1%
Mychildrendontdowellonstandardizedtests
4.9%
Todemonstratethepowerofnonviolenceasa
Mychildrenaskediftheycouldoptoutfrom
Togainknowledgeofeducationalissues
4.5%
2.0%
1.2%
48
Figure17:Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout(Marktoptworeasons;Q24)
Iopposeusingstudentsperformanceon
36.9%
Standardizedtestsforceteacherstoteachtothetest
33.8%
Iopposethegrowingroleofcorporationsinschools
30.4%
Standardizedteststakeawaytoomuchinstructional
26.5%
IopposetheCommonCoreStateStandards
25.8%
Iopposetheprivatizationofschools
16.0%
Iopposethegrowingroleofthefederalgovernment
8.6%
Standardizedtestsareunfairforracial/ethnic
7.5%
Todisrupttheusageofstandardizedtests
2.7%
Mychildrendontdowellonstandardizedtests
1.9%
Mychildrencomplainedaboutstandardizedtests
1.6%
Other
1.4%
Toraiseawarenessaboutpubliceducation
1.3%
Todemonstratethepowerofnonviolenceasa 0.7%
Mychildrenaskediftheycouldoptoutfrom 0.6%
Togainknowledgeofeducationalissues
0.0%
49
Figure18A:Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,bypoliticalideology(Q24)
45%
36%39%
26%
35% 34%
31%
33%
29%
22%
30%
23% 25%
24%
16%
9%
Ioppose Standardized
using
testsforce
students teachersto
performance teachtothe
on
test
standardized
teststo
evaluate
teachers
22%
19%
4%
8%
2%
9%
4%1%
Liberal
Middle
Conservative
50
Figure18B:Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,bypartyidentification(Q24)
38.8%
35.9%
29.8%
34.4%
33.5%
32.2%
26.5%
20.4%
Ioppose Standardized
using
testsforce
students teachersto
performance teachtothe
on
test
standardized
teststo
evaluate
teachers*
35.8%
35.0%
30.8%
29.6% 30.5%
28.0%
26.2%
26.1%
24.0%
23.3%
22.8%
16.9%
Republican
18.3%
15.4%
14.4% 16.8%
13.9%
8.6% 6.3%
8.3%
4.9%
4.3%
1.7%
1.2%
Democrat
Independent
Other
51
Figure19:Reasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout,byteachersvs.nonteachers
(Q24)
44%
27%
36%
30%
Ioppose Standardized
using
testsforce
students teachersto
performance teachtothe
on
test
standardized
teststo
evaluate
teachers
32%
27%
29%
22%
27%
18%
15%
10%
4% 4%
6% 5%
Others
Teachers/Educators
52
Figure20:Whatgradewouldyougivepublicschoolsinyourcommunity?(Q25)
43%
38%
31%
25%
22%
13%
9%
8%
4%
2%
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
A
4%
PDK2015
B
Ref/DK
53
Figure21A:Howsupportiveareyouofthefollowingtypesofstudenttests?(Q29)
%verysupportive
53%
46%
38%
35%
29%
27%
12%
10%
7%
PDK2014
54
Figure22B:Howsupportiveareyouofthefollowingtypesofstudenttests?(Q29)
%verysupportiveandsupportive
91%
80%
78%
78%
76%
74%
51%
44%
30%
PDK2014
55
Figure23:Howimportantarethefollowingideasforimprovingpublicschoolsinyourcommunity?
(Q31)
95%
82%
67%
66%
66%
61%
53%
45%
19%
6%
Qualityofthe
teachers
Usingteststo
measurewhat
studentshave
learned
PDK2014
56
Figure24:Inyouropinion,whichofthefollowingapproacheswouldprovidethemostaccurate
pictureofastudentsacademicprogress?(Markallthatapply;Q32)
100.0%
90.6%
90.0%
78.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
55.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
3.9%
1.3%
0.0%
Examplesof
studentswork
Written
Gradeawardedby
Scoreson
observationsbythe
theteacher
standardized
teachers
achievementtests
Other
57
Figure25:Whoshouldhavethegreatestinfluenceonthefollowingeducationissuesink12public
schools?(Q27)
Figure25A:Payingforthek12publiceducationsystem
46%46%
30%26%
24%23%
4%
Federal
government
State
government
Localschool
board
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
Ref/DK
PDK2015
Figure25B:Decidingwhatistaughtintheschool
62%
56%
30%28%
9%
15%
1%
Federal
government
State
government
Localschool
board
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
Ref/DK
PDK2014
58
Figure25C:Holdingschoolsaccountableforwhatstudentslearn
67%
44%
29%
33%
19%
4%
4%
Federal
government
State
government
Localschool
board
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
Ref/DK
PDK2015
Figure25D:Determiningtherightamountoftesting
80%
42%
31%
21%
19%
6%
6%
Federal
government
State
government
Localschool
board
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
Ref/DK
PDK2015
Figure25E:Settingeducationalstandardsforwhatstudentsshouldknow
49%
43%
28%
16%
35%
28%
1%
Federal
government
State
government
Localschool
board
NationalSurveyonOptingOut
Ref/DK
PDK2010
59
Figure26:Perceivedimpactoftheoptoutmovementatthestateandfederallevels(Q22)
51.1%
44.6%
25.8%
20.3%
19.7%
19.2%
10.4%
8.9%
Optoutmovementimpactedfederalpolicy
StronglyDisagree
SomewhatDisagree
Optoutmovementimpactedstatepolicy
SomewhatAgree
StronglyAgree
60
Appendix1:NationalSurveyonOptingout
Q1Howdidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?
Teachersorothereducationprofessionals
Friends,neighborsorrelatives
Otherparentsatyourchild'sschool
Schoolcommunicationssuchasawebsite,emailornewsletter
Media(TV,radio,newspaper)
Socialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,listserv,email,etc.)
Mychildrenortheirfriends
Publicfigureororganization
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q2Youindicatedthatyoufirstheardaboutoptingoutfromthemedia.Didyouhearfromnationalmediaorlocal
media?
Nationalmedia
Localmedia
Q3Youindicatedthatyoufirstheardaboutoptingoutfrompublicfigureororganization.Didyouhearfrom
national,stateorlocalpublicfigureororganization?
Nationalpublicfigureororganization
Statepublicfigureororganization
Localpublicfigureororganization
Q4Whendidyoufirsthearaboutoptingout?
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
5yearsagoorbeforehand
Q5Whichofthefollowingsourcesprovidedinformationthatmadeyouwanttoknowmoreaboutand/or
participateinactivitiesrelatingtooptingout?(Markallthatapply)
Teachersorothereducationprofessionals
Friends,neighborsorrelatives
Otherparentsatyourchild'sschool
Schoolcommunicationssuchasawebsite,emailornewsletter
Media(TV,radio,newspaper)
Socialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,listserv,email,etc.)
Mychildrenortheirfriends
Publicfigureororganization
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q6Areyoucurrentlytheparentorguardianofachildunderage18?
Yes
No
Q7Ifyes,howmanychildrenunder18areyouresponsiblefor?
Q8Haveyouoptedoutyourchild/childrenfromstandardizedtesting?
Yes,Ihaveoptedoutmychild/children
No,Ihavenotoptedoutmychild/children
61
Q9Whendidyoufirstoptoutfromstandardizedtesting?
Withinthepastyear
12yearsago
34yearsago
5yearsagoorbeforehand
Q10Pleaseusethetextboxbelowtosharewithuswhyyoudecidedtooptout.
Q11Whenyouhaveoptedout,didyouoptoutallorsomeofyourchildren?
Ioptedoutallofmychildren
Ioptedoutsomeofmychildren
Q12Haveyouevertakenanyofthefollowingactionsrelatingtooptingout?(Markallthatapply)
Attendedameeting
Takenpartinademonstrationorprotest(e.g.,heldabanner,handedoutleaflets)
CalledintoaliveradioorTVshowtoexpressanopinion
Contactedapoliticianorotherelectedofficialtoexpressaview
Discussedwithotherparentsinschool
Donatedmoneytoasocialorpoliticalactivity
Joinedanemaillist,anonlinechatforum,orablog
Postedonsocialmedia(Facebook,Twitter,Tumblr,etc.)
Raisedmoneyforasocialorpoliticalactivity
Sentalettertotheeditortoanewspaperormagazine
Signedapetition
Triedtoconvinceotherstogetinvolved
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q13Youindicatedthatyouhavecontactedapoliticianorotherelectedofficialtoexpressaview.Whichlevelof
thegovernmentdidyoucontact?(Markallthatapply)
Nationallevelofficial
Stategovernmentofficial
Localgovernmentofficial
Q14Pleaseusethetextboxbelowtosharewithuswhyyoudecidednottooptout.
Q15Howlikelyisitthatyouwilloptyourchild/childrenoutofstandardizedtestingthisyearorinthefuture?
Verylikely
Somewhatlikely
Somewhatunlikely
Notatalllikely
Q16Howmanyparentsofschoolagedchildrendoyouknowwhooptedtheirchildrenoutofstandardizedtesting?
None
One
Between2and5
Between6and10
Morethan10
62
Q17Howmanyoftheseparentsdoyouconsiderclosefriends?
None
Few
Some
Many
Most
Q18Haveyoueverbeencontactedbyanorganizationtoparticipateinanyoptoutactivities?
Yes
No
Q19Ifyes,whichorganization(s)havecontactedyoutoparticipateinanyoptoutactivities?Usethetextbox
below.
Q20Haveyoudiscussedoptingoutwithyourchildren?
Yes
No
Q21Inyouropinion,whatproblemdoestheoptoutmovementtrytoaddress?Usethetextboxbelow.
Q22Pleaseindicatehowmuchyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatements:
Strongly
Somewhat
Somewhat
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Theoptoutmovementhasimpactedfederal
assessmentpolicy
Theoptoutmovementhasimpactedstate
assessmentpolicy
Q23Peoplehavedifferentreasonsforparticipatinginactivitiesrelatedtooptingout.Inthisquestion,weare
interestedinthemainreasonsforyourparticipation.Pleasechooseuptofivereasons.[RandomizedOrder]
IopposetheCommonCoreStateStandards
Iopposethegrowingroleofcorporationsinschools
Iopposethegrowingroleofthefederalgovernmentinschools
Iopposetheprivatizationofschools
Iopposeusingstudentsperformanceonstandardizedteststoevaluateteachers
Mychildrenaskediftheycouldoptoutfromstandardizedtests
Mychildrencomplainedaboutstandardizedtests
Mychildrendontdowellonstandardizedtests
Standardizedtestsareunfairforracial/ethnicminorities
Standardizedtestsforceteacherstoteachtothetest
Standardizedteststakeawaytoomuchinstructionaltime
Todemonstratethepowerofnonviolenceasavehicleforsocialchange
Todisrupttheusageofstandardizedtests
Togainknowledgeofeducationalissues
Toraiseawarenessaboutpubliceducation
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q24Fromallthereasonsyoumentioned,whatarethemaintworeasons?
63
Q25Whatgradewouldyougivepublicschoolsinyourcommunity?
A(1)
B(2)
C(3)
D(4)
F(5)
Q26Thinkingabouttheschoolagechildrenforwhomyouarecurrentlyresponsible,whatkindsofschoolshave
theyattended?(Markallthatapply)
Publicschool
Charterschool
Privateschool
Homeschool
Parochial/religiousschool
Q27Whoshouldhavethegreatestinfluenceonthefollowingeducationissuesink12publicschools?
Federal
State
Local
Decidingwhatistaughtintheschool
Holdingschoolsaccountableforwhatstudentslearn
Determiningtherightamountoftesting
Settingeducationalstandardsforwhatstudentsshouldknow
Q28Howimportantisitforyoutoknowhowthestudentsinyourcommunitysschoolsperformonstandardized
testscomparedtothefollowing:
Very
Somewhat
Notvery
Notatall
important
important
important
important
Studentsinotherschooldistricts
Studentsinotherstates
Studentsinothercountries
Q29Howsupportiveareyouofthefollowingtypesofstudenttests?
Very
Somewhat
supportive
supportive
Collegeentrancetests,suchasSATorACT
Teststhatdetermineifthestudentshouldbe
promotedfromonegradetothenext
Testsusedtoawardhighschoolstudentscollege
credit,suchasAPexams
Testsusedtodeterminewhetherastudentcanbe
awardedahighschooldiploma
Testsusedtodeterminewhetherachildhas
masteredacertainbodyofcurricularcontent
Notvery
supportive
Notatall
supportive
64
Q30Doyouthinktheteachersinyourchilds/childrensschoolsgenerallysupportoropposestandardizedtesting?
Stronglysupport
Somewhatsupport
Neithersupportnoroppose
Somewhatoppose
Stronglyoppose
Q31Therearemanyideasabouthowtoimprovethequalityofpublicschools.Howimportantarethefollowing
ideasforimprovingpublicschoolsinyourcommunity?
Very
Somewhat
Notvery
Notatall
important
important
important
important
Qualityoftheteachers
Expectationsforwhatstudentsshouldlearn
Effectivenessoftheprincipals
Howmuchmoneytheschoolshavetospend
Usingteststomeasurewhatstudentshavelearned
Otherfactors(ENTERTEXT)
Q32Inyouropinion,whichofthefollowingapproacheswouldprovidethemostaccuratepictureofastudents
academicprogress?(Markallthatapply)
Examplesofstudentswork
Writtenobservationsbytheteachers
Gradeawardedbytheteacher
Scoresonstandardizedachievementtests
Other
Q33Howwouldyouclassifyyourpoliticalviews?Pleaseuseascaleof1to7,where1isextremelyliberal,4is
middleoftheroad,and7isextremelyconservative
1Extremelyliberal
2
3
4middleoftheroad
5
6
7Extremelyconservative
Q34Generallyspeaking,doyouusuallythinkofyourselfasaRepublican,Democrat,Independent,orsomething
else?
Republican
Democrat
Independent
Other:(ENTERTEXT)
Q35In2012,youmayrememberthatBarackObamaranforPresidentontheDemocraticticketagainstMitt
RomneyontheRepublicanticket.Doyourememberforsurewhetherornotyouvotedinthatelection?
Voted
Didnotvote
Dontremember
65
Q36Ingeneral,howoftendoyoudiscusspoliticsandpublicaffairswithothers?
Everyday
Atleastonceaweek
Atleastonceamonth
Lessthanonceamonth
Never
Q37Peoplesometimesbelongtodifferentkindsofvoluntaryorganizations.Pleaseindicatewhetheryouhave
participatedintheactivitiesofanyofthefollowingorganizationsduringthepasttwelvemonths.(Markallthat
apply)
Yes
No
Churchorreligiousorganization
Sportorrecreationalorganization
Art,musicoreducationalorganization
Laborunion
Politicalparty
Environmentalorganization
Professionalassociation
Humanitarianorcharitableorganization
Consumerorganization
Civilrightsorganization
Anyotherorganization(writein)
Q38Haveyoueverparticipatedinanyactivitiesrelatingtothefollowingissues?(Markallthatapply)
AntiWar/Peace
Civilrights
Ecologyandenvironment
Gunrights
Familyvalues
Labor/workersrights/fairwage
LGBTrights/marriageequality
OccupyWallStreet
TeaParty
Womensrights/prochoice
Antiabortion/prolife
Otherprotests(ENTERTEXT)
Q39Whatisyourgender?
Man
Woman
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Iprefernottoanswer
Q40Whatyearwereyouborn?
66
Q41Whatracial/ethnicgroupbestdescribesyou?(Markallthatapply)
AmericanIndian/AlaskaNative
Asian
Black/AfricanAmerican
Hispanic,Latino,orSpanishorigin
NativeHawaiian/PacificIslander
White/Caucasian
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q42Whatisthehighestlevelofeducationyouhavecompleted?
Lessthanhighschool
Highschool
Associate/communitycollege/nursingdegree(AA/AS)
Somecollegebutnodegree
Bachelorsdegree(BA/BS/AB)
Graduatedegree(Masters,M.D,J.D,orotherprofessionalordoctoratedegree)
Q43Doyouconsideryourselftobe:
Heterosexualorstraight
Gayorlesbian
Bisexual
Other
Iprefernottoanswer
Q44ThisresearchstudyfocusedontheoptoutmovementintheUnitedStates.Whatstatedoyoulivein?
Q45Yourcurrentresidenceisinwhichzipcode?
Q46Whatisyourcurrentmaritalstatus?
Married/livingwithapartner
Widowed
Divorced
Separated
Nevermarried
Q47Whatlanguage(s)otherthanEnglishdoyouspeakathome?(ENTERTEXT)
Q48DoyouhaveaccesstotheInternetorWorldWideWebinyourhome?
Yes
No
Q49Areyoucurrentlyworkingforpay?
Yes
No
Q50Doesanyoneinyourclosecircleoffamilyorfriendsworkintheeducationfield?
Yes
No
Q51Doyouworkintheeducationfieldasateacheroraneducator?
Yes
No
67
Q52Whatkindofworkdoyoudoforyourmainjob?(ENTERTEXT)
Q53Inanaverageweek,howmanyhoursdoyoutypicallyworkinyourjoborjobs?(ENTERTEXT)
Q54Whatreligiondoyouconsideryourself?
Catholic
Protestant
OtherChristian
Jewish
Muslim
Someotherreligion(ENTERTEXT)
Ihavenoreligiousaffiliation
Q55Wouldyoudescribeyourselfas:
Veryreligious
Moderatelyreligious
Slightlyreligious
Notreligiousatall
Q56Thelastquestionisforclassificationpurposesonly.Consideringallsourcesofincomeandallsalaries,what
wasyourhouseholdstotalannualincomein2015?
0$19,999
$20,000$29,999
$30,000$39,999
$40,000$49,999
$50,000$74,999
$75,000$99,999
$100,000$149,999
Morethan$150,000
Other(ENTERTEXT)
Q57Weareinterestedinyourthoughtsaboutoptingoutortheotherissueswehaveraisedinthissurvey.Please
usethetextboxbelowtoaddanyadditionalcomments.(ENTERTEXT)