Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3d 1130
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-91-3389-S)
Argued: Kieron F. Quinn, Quinn, Ward & Kershaw, P.A., Baltimore, MD,
for Appellant. Kent A. Gardiner, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for
Appellee. On Brief: Thomas Joseph Minton, John Augustine Bourgeois,
Quinn, Ward & Kershaw, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Jonathan
H. Pittman, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit
Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM
1
I.
2
II.
or near the Work, or by any other person or property, real or personal, caused in
whole or in part by the acts or omissions of [Montel], and its Subcontractors, or
anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, while engaged in the
performance of the Work.
2
This judgment was affirmed by this court. Wells v. General Elec. Co., 9 F.3d
1112 (4th Cir.1993)
We have examined Montel's other allegations of error and conclude that they
are without merit