Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dichoso|1
Civil Law
Things necessary to be put in your head
FAMILY CODE
MARRIAGES WHICH ARE VOID FROM THE BEGINNING FOR REASONS OF PUBLIC POLICY [BIKAS]
Art. 38, Family Code; nine (9) are enumerated therein, but they can be summarized into five (5):
Dichoso|2
KINDS OF ACCESSION
Accession
Continua
Discreta
Natural
Civil
Movable
Immovable
Industrial
Natural
4 forms:
Alluvion
Avulsion
Change of
course of river
Formation of
islands
Industrial
3 works:
Building
Planting
Sowing
Commixtion/
Specification
confusion
Adjunction/
conjunction
5 ways:
Engraftment (inclusion)
Attachment (soldadura)
Weaving (tejido)
Painting (Pintura)
Writing (Escritura)
NOTE:
Owns materials
1
3
Dichoso|3
Bad Faith
Good Faith
2: Owner of Materials
Situation #1
Good Faith
Bad Faith
Situation #2
Good Faith
3: Owner of
Materials
Situation #3
1: Land owner
2: Builder/Planter/Sower
(Art. 455)
1: to answer subsidiarily for the materials IF any of the following occur:
a. Insolvency of the builder, planter, or sower
b. Owner of the land appropriates the building, planting, or sowing
not liable he chooses to demolish/remove what was BSP. (Art. 455 450)
2: Pay owner of materials (+ damages 2 is in bad faith)
3: Has a right to be reimbursed.
Dichoso|4
Bad Faith
1: Land owner
2: Builder/Planter/Sower
Good Faith
Bad Faith
CO-OWNERSHIP
Acts of Administration
Refer to the enjoyment,
exploitation, & alteration
of the thing which do not
affect its substance, form,
Acts of Alteration
(Strict dominion)
Acts by virtue of which a co-owner, in
opposition to the expressed or tacit
agreement of all the co-owners, and in
violation of their will, changes the thing
Dichoso|5
Acts of Administration
or purpose.
Transitory in character
Do not affect the
substance or form
In relation to the right of a
co-owner, they require
the consent of the
majority
Can be exercised by the
co-owners through others
Acts of Alteration
(Strict dominion)
from the state in which the others
believe it would remain, or withdraws it
from the use to which they believe it is
intended.
Permanent
Relates to the substance or the essence
of the thing
Requires the consent of all co-owners
USUFRUCT, EXTINGUISHMENT [DEF MR LT PRNA (READ AS DEF MORO LOTO PORNA)] (ART 603)
Death of usufructuary
Expiration of the period /Fulfillment of the resolutory condition
Merger of the usufruct and ownership in the same person
Renunciation of the usufructuary
Total Loss of the thing in the usufruct
Termination of the right of the person constituting the usufruct
Prescription
Rescission/annulment of the contract which is the source of the right of the usufruct
Non-compliance with any condition agreed upon by the parties as agreed upon by the parties as
ground(s) for terminating the usufruct
10. Abandonment by the usufructuary
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Caucion Juratoria - A sworn duty to take good care of the property of another and return same at the
end of the usufruct. (Art. 587)
Dichoso|6
Nuisance [HIASO]
(Art. 694) Any any act, omission, establishment, business, condition of property, or anything else
which:
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
NOTES:
The doctrine of attractive nuisance is not applicable to bodies of water, in the absence of some
unusual condition or artificial feature other than mere water and its location.
As a rule of thumb, an imitation of nature is not nuisance. (lecture of Dean Abella on CIV1)
Doctrine of comparative utility or the balancing of utilities doctrine
There is nuisance if the annoyance outweighs the utility to the actor and to the society as a whole.
(source: Rabuya on Property, 2008 ed., p. 580, citing US jurisprudence)
A Acquired
T transmitted
Occupation
A
Law
A or T
Donation
A or T
Tradition
A or T
Intellectual Creation
A
Acquisitive Prescription
A
Succession
A or T
O Original
D - Derivative
Original
Original
Derivative
Derivative
Original
Original
Derivative
Dichoso|7
1. If testator Transforms the thing bequeathed in such a manner that it does not retain either
the form or the denomination it had
2. Testator Alienates the thing bequeathed or any part thereof
3. Total Loss of thing bequeathed during the lifetime of the testator, or after his death without
the heir's fault.
4. Legacy of credit shall lapse if the testator, after having made it, brings an Action against the
debtor for the payment of his debt
Dichoso|8
ACCESSION
Predecease
or
Incapacity
Disinheritance
Repudiation
1.
2.
1.
2.
TESTAMENTARY
LEGITIME
FREE PORTION
(R.R.) Right of
1. Substitution (956)
Representation
2. Accession (859-861)
(I.S.) Intestate
3. Intestate Succession
Succession
R.R.
N/A
I.S.
1. Substitution
I.S.
2. Accession
3. Intestate Succession
INTESTATE
1. R.R.
2. I.S.
1. Accession
2. I.S.
OBLIGATIONS
Culpa Contractual
...merely incidental to the
performance of an already
existing obligation
vinculum juris.. exists independently of the
negligence
Good father of Is NOT a defense
a family
Presumption of
YES
negligence
Burden of
defendant
proof
Source of
Breach (non-fulfillment of
obligation
contract)
Culpa Aquiliana
...substantive and
independent
Negligence is...
KINDS OF OBLIGATIONS
Kinds of Obligation according to Art 1182
Casual
Potestative
Dependent
on...
Chance
(valid)
Mixed
On the part
of the...
3rd party
(valid)
Creditor
(valid)
Debtor
Resolutory
condition
(valid)
Creditor
(valid)
Debtor
(valid)
suspensive
condition
(void)
TIP: Only obligations that are (1) potestative (2) on the part of the debtor (3) that are subject to a
suspensive condition are void. All others are valid.
rd
Dichoso|9
ALTERNATIVE OBLIGATIONS
Scenarios for
Alternative Obligations
Only 1 is practicable
All is lost through
fortuitous event
1 is lost through
debtors fault
1 is lost through
creditors fault
All is lost through
debtors fault
Active
Passive
Mixed
DEBTOR
Solidary
Joint
Solidary
CREDITOR
Joint
Solidary
Solidary
D i c h o s o | 10
(Other causes)
7. Waiver/renunciation by the creditor (Art. 6)
8. Compromise (Art. 2028)
9. Fulfillment of resolutory condition (Art. 1179)
10. Fulfillment of resolutory term or period (Art. 1193)
11. Happening of unforeseen events (Art. 1174)
12. Abandonment of the property charged with an obligation like the abandonment of an interest in
a party wall (Rabuya on Property, 2008 ed., p. 532)
13. Decision or will of one of parties in certain contracts like agency, partnership and lease of
services (Pineda on Oblicon, 2000 ed., p. 193)
14. Mutual agreement or dissent (Mutuo disenso)
15. Prescription (Art. 1139)
16. Change of civil status (as when a married woman becomes a widow, or when an unmarried
woman gets married) (Paras on Oblicon, 2000 ed., p. 341)
17. Death of debtor, when the obligation is purely personal
NOVATION
Conventional Subrogation (novation)
Governing law: Art. 1300 to 1304
Lack of consent of the debtor...
... is a defense. Consent is necessary
Effectivity: from the moment of
subrogation
Extinguishes the original obligation
and creates a new one.
CONTRACTS
FORM OF CONTRACTS
[note: numbering here was purposely done. All 8 must be in writing]
D i c h o s o | 11
Contracts that must appear not only in writing but must also be registered, else, void:
7. Chattel mortgage (Art. 2140)
8. Sale or transfer of large cattle (Art. 1581 Act 1147, sec. 22)
SALES
EFFECT OF GROSS INADEQUACY OF PRICE
General rule: It does not affect the validity of a contract of sale (Art. 1470, NCC).
Exception:
a. If such inadequacy may indicate a defect in the consent, or that
b. The parties really intended a donation or some other act or contract (Art. 1470, NCC). Thus, lesion
or inadequacy of cause shall not invalidate a contract, unless there has been fraud, mistake or
undue influence (Art. 1355, NCC).
c. Price is so low as to be shocking to the conscience (Rosales v. Court of Appeals, 405 Phil. 638
(2001))
XPN to XPN: when there is a right to redeem.1 Thus, gross inadequacy of price in a judicial sale does
not affect the contract of sale, since the more inadequate the winning bid is at public sale, the more
easily it is for the owner to redeem the property. (Vda de Gordon vs. CA (109 SCRA 388))
Condition
Promise depends on...
Transfer of ownership
Reverting of ownership
Risk of
loss/deterioration
Zomboanga Barter Traders Kilusang Bayan, Inc., et. al., vs. Plagata, G.R. No. 148433, September 30, 2008
D i c h o s o | 12
AGENCY
EFFECTS OF APPOINTMENT OF SUBSTITUTE/LIABILITY IN CASE OF DAMAGE TO PRINCIPAL (ART. 1892)
EXTINGUISHMENT [EDWARD]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TRUSTS
A trust is not necessarily a contract. Heres why:
Trust
May or may not have a consideration
Always fiduciary in character
Contract
Always supported with a consideration
May or may not be fiduciary
RESULTING TRUST
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
D i c h o s o | 13
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS
D i c h o s o | 14
D i c h o s o | 15
D i c h o s o | 16
D i c h o s o | 17
D i c h o s o | 18
D i c h o s o | 19
TORTS
DEFENSES
1. Emergency rule
2. Assumption of risk (by the plaintiff)
3. Contributory negligence
(XPN: Attractive nuisance)
4. Force Majeure (Art. 1174)
5. Prescription (Art. 1146, 1150)
6. Diligence
7. Res Judicata
8. Waiver
Principle of Presumed negligence when an inanimate object causes damage to another, the owner
thereof becomes liable. Proof of fault or negligence is unnecessary because this is presumed.2
Cleanup liability/polluter pay principle the person responsible for the pollution is also responsible for
the clean-up and other damages caused
Wild-beast theory the person who keeps for his own purposes anything likely to do mischief if it
escapes, must keep it at his peril, and failure to do so is prima facie evidence of negligence which will
make him answerable for all damages which is the natural consequence of its escape. (Pineda, citing an
England case)
Principle of created risks when a person introduces in the society a dangerous object from necessity
or profit, he exposes others to danger. If it injures another even without negligence on the part of the
owner or proprietor, he should be held liable for damages.
Doctrine of avoidable consequences a party cannot recover damages flowing from consequences
which the party could reasonably have avoided.
Doctrine of Respondeat Superior- This doctrine applies when the employer or parent is liable not
because of his own act but because of the act or conduct of the employee whether or not he exercised
due care.
GEN: This doctrine does not apply to a parent or an employer who exercised proper care & diligence.
XPN: In case of employees, if the act is violative under Article 103 of the Revised Penal Code,
employers will still be held liable even if there be proof of the exercise of due diligence.