Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20,000 units
50,000 units
30,000 units
July
August
25,000 units
15,000 units.
McGrawHill/Irwin
McGrawHill/Irwin
For the next three months, the direct labor workforce will
be paid for a minimum of 1,500 hours per month.
Manufacturing Overhead
Budget
Royal Company uses a variable
manufacturing overhead rate of $1 per
unit produced.
Fixed manufacturing overhead is $50,000 per
month and includes $20,000 of noncash
costs (primarily depreciation of plant assets).
McGrawHill/Irwin
Royal:
$75,000.
$30,000.
McGrawHill/Irwin
Budget
Budgeted
Income
Statement
McGrawHill/Irwin
Land - $50,000
Equipment - $175,000
McGrawHill/Irwin
page 1
April
May
June
Quarter
April
May
June
Quarter
April
May
June
Quarter
April
May
June
Quarter
May Sales:
June Sales:
page 6
June
Quarter
May Purchases:
June Purchases:
April
May
June
Quarter
April
May
June
Quarter
Production (units)
Direct labor hours
Labor hours required
Guaranteed labor hours:
Labor hours paid
Wage rate
Total direct labor cost
Manufacturing Overhead Budget
Production (units)
Variable mfg OH rate
Variable mfg OH costs
Fixed mfg OH costs
Total mfg OH costs
Less: noncash costs
Cash disbursements for mfg. OH
Quantity
Costs
April
May
Total
June
Quarter
page 4
The CASH Budget
Beginning cash balance
Add: cash collections
Total available:
Less: Disbursements
Materials
Direct labor
Mfg. Overhead
S&A
Equipment purchase
Dividends
Total disbursements
Excess (deficiency) of cash
available over disbursements
Financing:
Borrowing
Repayments
Interest
Total Financing
Ending cash balance:
April
May
June
Quarter
page
1,000,000
43,000
Current Assets:
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Raw materials inventory
Finish Goods inventory
Total current assets
Property and equipment
Land
Building
Equipment
Total property and equipment
Total Assets
Accounts Payable
Common stock
Retained earnings
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
HAYES CORPORATION
CASH BUDGET
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/2000
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE
Q1
38,000
Q2
25,500
Q3
15,000
Q4
19,400
170,000
208,000
198,000
223,500
228,000
243,000
258,000
277,400
23,200
62,000
94,300
3,000
182,500
27,200
72,000
99,300
10,000
3,000
211,500
31,200
82,000
104,300
3,000
220,500
35,200
92,000
109,300
3,000
239,500
25,500
12,000
22,500
37,900
FINANCING
Add: Borrowings
Less: Repayments
ENDING CASH
BALANCE
3000
0
0
0
$
25,500
15,000
0
3100
$
19,400
0
0
$
37,900
Budgeting Lessons:
Note: this is a true story although some of the details were altered due to memory failure of the writer.
Some of the names are changed.
Once upon a time in the late 80s there was a small hi-tech company located in the Bay Area (California) with some 200
employees at its corporate office. Well call it the GuyTech. It had 380 employees worldwide located in sales/service
offices and one remote R&D office in Japan. It had the usual organization structure:
President (background in R&D and Engineering), CFO, COO (background in Manufacturing), VP-Engineering, VPOperations (Manufacturing, Planning/Purchasing, Shipping/Receiving), R&D, VP-Sales & Marketing, VP-Human
Resources.
The Budgeting process consisted of the following:
Accounting would provide information for each VP above which included:
o Current costs (salary by employee plus other actual expensestravel, supplies, depreciation) for the past
3 quarters
o Managers were told to assume a 6% across the board salary increase (to be allocated to the
employees based on performance)
o Managers were told that the Sales Budget would assume a 15% increase in Sales Volume over the
prior year
Managers were to work with their accounting liaison and jointly prepare a budget for each of their functional
areas, with proposed headcount increases, and other expenses.
Steve (VP of Engineering) and Jack (VP of Manufacturing) individually worked with one of the Accounting Managers,
Ray, to develop their proposed budgets and take it into the Executive Committee (President, CFO, and COO) along
with Ray. Note: Ray is 28 years old and considered to be one of the more green (inexperienced) managers.
Here is how each of them prepared for and conducted their meeting with the Executive Committee:
Jack: Jack worked closely with Ray, having her check and double check his arithmetic and logic (I dont want to look
ridiculous in there!). He met with Ray the morning of his Executive Committee meeting and ran through his
presentation. He went into the meeting with all the required documents and a few backup documents. During the meeting
the President, CFO, and COO had a few questions and Jack was ready with his answers:
Why does travel go up from last year? Jack could easily refer to a supporting schedule and note the 4-5 trips
planned for conferences, or customer visits, or visits to remote offices. There were a few more questions
along
this line.
Why are you adding headcount in Planning/Purchasing? Jack discussed that with the 15% increase in
Sales Volume, he felt it was reasonable to add on another Purchasing Agent.
Why is there an additional Manufacturing supervisor? Jack gave the same reason as the previous question,
supported this time by handwritten spreadsheets which showed the ratio of number of work orders per
supervisor and how a 15% increase in work orders (to go along with the 15% in sales).
Jacks meeting was punctual; the Executive Committee recommended he eliminate about 10% of his costs, specifically
identifying a few areascut trips in half, and skip the headcount increases. Jacks budget was approved (after the
10% cuts). Jack left the meeting congratulating himself that all had gone well and that he hadnt looked stupid.
Steve: Steves department was one of the first to have desktop computers, Macintoshes, which came preloaded with Word
and Excel. Steve quickly mastered Excel and took the budget data provided by Accounting and re-keyed it into Excel. He
created a multi-dimensional spreadsheet with page one representing all of his departments, and the other pages
representing the individual departments (drafting, design, pre-production, software engineering, etc.).
Ray attempted to work with him and ended up just getting an Excel lesson on how to link spreadsheets. Steve came to the
meeting with multiple copies of his spreadsheets for all attendees. As the format was original, much of the meeting was
spent in explaining how to read his spreadsheets. As the spreadsheets were not stapled together, some of the managers
C:\Users\jpaquett\Documents\AASpring 2012\handouts\Budget - Jack Steve.doc
were on the wrong page, and this also had to be explained. As everyone got comfortable (sort of) with Steves
documents, the President, CFO, and COO had a few questions.
Why does travel go up from last year?
A week later Steve and Ray returned for a 3 budget meeting. Steves budget was reviewed, by project. Some minor cuts
to Steves budget were suggested; Steve reminded them that this would have an impact on some key projects. One trip
was cut from the travel budget. The President then reminded Steve of another project he had omitted and suggested that
Steve keep with his proposed budget (less the one trip for a conference) but also add on another $50,000 just in case a
new project came up.
Steves budget was approved. When Steve left the meeting he bragged to Ray, That cut is okay, I just stuck it in as
an extra. They always cut something.
1. Which manager, in your opinion, is the successful one here? How do you define success?
2. From the point of view of Ray, what could she have learned in terms of how to successfully obtain budget approval
for her own department in the future.
3. From the point of view of the CFO, based on the experiences of Jack and Steve, how could you improve the budget
process to assure the maximum level of fairness, efficiency, motivation, compliance with overall company
goals/objectives.