Aspiring Minds' Campus Analysis Report

Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology

(BE/Btech, 2017)

Aspiring Minds Assessment Pvt. Ltd.

Study of Students' Employability and their Performance in AMCAT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose of this Report
Introduction
Score Interpretation
Percentile Interpretation
Section No. 1 - Students\' Capability and Training Need Analysis
I. Inferences
II. Performance Summary
III. Training Suggestion

Section No. 2 - Students\' Employability

I. Perspective on Corporate Shortlisting Criteria
II. Employability Prospects
III. Bird's-eye-view of Employability

Section No. 3 - Intra Campus Comparison

I. Stream Comparison

Section No. 4 - Aspiring Minds' Concluding Words

Section No. 5 - Appendix
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.

Candidates Score Table

Statistical Significance (Confidence)
National Average (Norm)
Variance (Standard Deviation)
About Aspiring Minds

Purpose of this Report

The Aspiring Minds Campus Analysis Report provides a detailed analysis of the
student quality and their employability in the industry. Our aim is to produce a
report which is useful to the campus and includes a comprehensive comparison
across different degrees, streams and batches. All such analysis will serve as
an employability checkup for students and accordingly, the administration can
prioritize its efforts to increase the overall student employability.
The various sections of this report give a broad view on numerous aspects
related to the performance of students. These sections contain tables and charts
which have been constructed after an in-depth analysis of AMCAT assessment
data collected from your campus. We evaluate your students' performance in
comparison to the nation-wide norms, which are calculated from a sample of
entry-level job-aspirants over 22 states across India. This comparison reveals
those areas in which your students fare better (or otherwise) than the average
student assessed by us, and determines the employability of the students in
diverse industries. This report will give a clear picture of the employability status
of students eligible for the listed companies and also help the institute to
improve on the weak areas figured by Aspiring Minds' analysis.
We also provide an intra-campus analysis to give an overview of the
characteristics of top performing students in comparison to the rest, such that
appropriate measures can be taken to help the low performers fare better.
On the basis of our analysis, we suggest certain recommendations for your
campus. We are certain that these recommendations will help Sreenidhi
Institute of Science and Technology march towards its goal of providing excellent
education to the students, which will result in better employability. Our
recommendations, if properly implemented, will also help increase the standing
of the campus amongst prospective students.

Data Snapshot

Campus

Sreenidhi Institute of
Science and
Technology

Date of testing

05-July-16

Degree tested

BE/Btech (381
students)

Number of students compared in each stream

CSE

73 students

IT

53 students

ECE/ETC

194 students

EE/EEE

28 students

Mechanical Engineering

33 students

Note: some students either did not enter their stream or entered it incorrectly. These students have
not been included in any stream. Thus total students tested could be more than students in all
reported streams.

Introduction
This report is based on the results of AMCAT assessment conducted at your
campus on 05-July-16 where a total of 381 students were tested. AMCAT is a two
and half-hour adaptive test with multiple modules including aptitude, domain
skills and personality assessment. It is India's largest employability test and is
taken by more than 30,000 students every month. Being India's only adaptive
employability test, it is used as a benchmark for hiring by several companies
across India. The details of AMCAT assessment are as follows:
AMCAT Modules
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.

English Comprehension
Quantitative Ability
Logical Ability
Computer Programming
Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Aspiring Minds Personality Inventory (AMPI)

I. English Comprehension
Familiarity with the English Language in its various nuances is an
essential skill, especially in the current climate of global networking.
Ideally, any recruitment should involve a test of skills in handling the
language in ways that promote the objectives of the company. Needless
to state, an appropriate test is necessary.
Our English test uses a variety of internationally standardized resources
for framing questions aimed at determining the candidate's ability to a)
understand the written text (b) comprehend the spoken word and (c)
communicate effectively through written documents. The test broadly
covers the following areas:
a. A wide-ranging vocabulary to cope with general and specific
terminology.
b. Syntax and sentence structure, the incorrect use of which
distorts meaning and becomes a communication hurdle.
c. Comprehension exercises designed to test a candidate's ability
to read fluently and understand correctly.
d. The ability to understand and use suitable phrases, which enrich
the meaning of what is conveyed.

Time management and accuracy in conformity with the examiner's

criteria.

II. Quantitative Ability

The Quantitative Ability assesses the ability of the candidate in following
two aspects:
a. Basic understanding of numbers and applications
This section tests whether the candidate has understanding of
basic number system, i.e., fractions, decimals, negative,
positive, odd, even numbers, rational numbers, etc. The
candidate should know how to do basic operations on these
numbers, understand concepts of factors/divisibility and have
good practice of algebra. Apart from operations on numbers,
the candidate should know how to convert a real-world
problem into equations, which is to be solved to find an
unknown quantity. The candidate is tested on Word Problems
representing various scenarios to assess the same.
b. Analytical/Engineering Maths
These are aspects of mathematics needed for Engineering
disciplines and data analysis. This includes permutationcombination, probability and understanding of logarithms.
III. Logical Ability
The Logical Ability section assesses the capacity of an individual to
interpret things objectively, to be able to perceive and interpret trends
to make generalizations and be able to analyze assumptions behind
an argument/statement. These abilities are primary for success of a
candidate in the industry. Specifically, these are divided into following
sections:
a. Deductive Reasoning: Assesses the ability to synthesize
information and derive conclusions.
b. Inductive Reasoning: Assesses the ability to learn by example,
imitation or hit-and-trial. This also provides an indication of how
creative the individual is.
c. Subjective Reasoning: Assesses the critical thinking ability of an
individual to see through loopholes in an argument or group of
statements.

All these abilities are tested both using numerical and verbal stimuli.
Coachable questions have been identified and removed.

IV. Computer Programming

The Computer Programming Principles module evaluates the suitability
of the candidate for the software industry. It not only tests the
knowledge and application of basic constructs of programming, but
also concepts of data structures, algorithm analysis and object-orientedprogramming.
The test is language-independent and all programming questions use
a pseudo-code. Significant effort has been made to exclude memorybased and rote-learning questions. The test contains questions on
debugging programs, finding the output of programs, completing
incomplete programs, finding complexity of algorithms, questions on
implementation and operations on different data structures, etc.
The test contains the following sections:
a. Structure and constructs of Computer Programs
b. Data-structures and Basics Algorithms
c. Object Oriented Programming Concepts
V. Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering
The Electronics and Semiconductor test assesses the suitability of the
candidate for the SOC, Embedded Systems, VLSI design, etc. companies.
This test together with that of Computer Programming assesses the
suitability of candidates for EDA companies. The test has the following
sections:
a. Analog Electronics
1. Basic Components, their operations and Circuit Analysis
2. Active Components, Large, Small Signal and Circuit
Analysis
3. Frequency domain and time domain analysis of
systems, Feedback and Stability
4. Opamp based circuits and analysis
b. Digital Electronics
1. Boolean Algebra, Minimization of Boolean Functions
2. Implementation and Analysis of logic gates
3. Sequential blocks - flip-flops and latches

4. Digital Circuits and Blocks

5. State Machines and design of Complex sequential
circuits
VI. Mechanical Engineering
In this module, a student is tested for his understanding of mechanical
engineering - theoretical and practical knowledge. Questions from
different areas in this subject are asked so as to assess a student on his
complete knowledge of the subject. The test has the following sections:
a. Manufacturing Science
b. Thermodynamics & IC Engines
c. Fluid and Machine Mechanics
VII. Electrical Engineering
The Electrical Engineering module has been designed to assess a
candidate's knowledge working in power sector. The module is meant
for B Tech. students who may be freshers or the students who may be
exposed to industry for one to two years. The module checks for the
concepts which would be used by the engineers in everyday working.
The module consists of both conceptual and practical aspects of the
subject.

VIII. AMPI: Aspiring Minds Personality Inventory

It is the first personality inventory designed for personality analysis
of Indian college graduates for the purpose of inputs to corporate
personnel selection. AMPI is based on the five factor model, which is
by far the only scientifically validated and reliable personality model.
Several scientific studies across the world have shown that different
combinations of the five factor personality traits strongly correlate to
different job profiles and predict long term job performance reliably.
AMPI analysis will be a worthwhile objective input to the corporate
selection process and help find better matches to job profiles. The AMPI
questionnaire asks for candidate's reaction under various scenarios, his/
her beliefs, likes-dislikes to ascertain his/her personality factors. Factors
map to traits such as candidate motivation, self-discipline, sociability,
persistence, confidence, emotional stability, etc. which both intuitively
and scientifically map to job requirements. AMPI builds in a strong
proprietary methodology to control distortions due to social desirability
and answer-faking.

AMPI has been designed specifically keeping the fresh Indian graduates
in mind. Context is very important in design of items. AMPI items take
into consideration the cultural sensibilities of Indians, the scenarios
students face at college/home, also depending on the socio-economic
status of the target population. This brings AMPI into a unique position
as compared to generic/Western inventories, which do not suit our
target population and fail miserably.
AMPI's scoring is based on statistical techniques of factor analysis,
polytomous item analysis and structural modeling. Norms have been set
on large candidate assessment done on final year graduates. Testforms
are auto-generated such that each factor can be reliably predicted in
feasible amount of time. Test-retest reliability and test validity are
statistically guaranteed.
AMPI traits are:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

Extraversion
Conscientiousness
Emotional Stability
Openness to Experience
Agreeableness

Score Interpretation
All scores lie between 100 and 900. The scores are normalized on a Gaussian
curve using statistical techniques. The scores follow global standards of validity
and reliability. They are valid for three years and remain consistent on repeat
testing unless the candidate's ability improves because of sustained long term
efforts.

Percentile Interpretation
The percentile of the candidate is calculated over a National average group
based on the percentile of all students tested by Aspiring Minds. Several
statistical studies conducted demonstrate clearly that the percentiles are stable
for a year and will not vary more than two percentile points. The percentile is a
very important metric and gives an idea of the candidate's rank in comparison
with all graduates nationwide.

Section 1 - Students' Capability and Training Need

Analysis
This section shows the overall performance of the campus students, along with
their average and standard deviation in each module. In Campus Aptitude and
Skill Chart below, BLUE triangles represent average score of your campus in each
module. The RED triangle represents Total Aptitude score, which comprises of
English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability scores.

The Campus Ability Table below shows the campus average scores (percentiles)
and their standard deviations in comparison with the National norms. It also
indicates if the difference between the Campus Average score and the National
Average score is significant and if so, at what confidence level. Norm is the
National Average of all the candidates tested on AMCAT. Confidence level refers
to the likelihood (ranging from 0 to 100%) that the results observed in the
study are real, and not due to chance. In this analysis, if confidence level is
less than 90%, it indicates that the difference between the Campus Average and
the National Average is not significant and that both the scores are equivalent.
For confidence level greater than or equal to 90%, the difference between
the Campus Average and the National Average is considered significant. If the
difference is positive, on an average, the campus students are performing better
than the National Average and vice versa.

Campus Ability Table

Campus National
Campus
Difference
Is
Average Average
Modules Attempted Average
(Campus - Confidence
(Std.
(Std.
Significant?1
Percentile
National)
Dev.)
Dev.)
English
522
475
68%
47
100%
Yes
Comprehension
(106)
(100)
527
495
Quantitative Ability
61%
32
100%
Yes
(133)
(115)
513
465
Logical Ability
68%
48
100%
Yes
(68)
(101)
Computer
628
400
98%
228
100%
Yes
Programming
(130)
(116)
Electronics and
358
Semiconductor
72%
310 (80)
48
100%
Yes
(75)
Engineering
Mechanical
409
29%
450 (75)
-41
100%
Yes
Engineering
(82)
Electrical
413
380
62%
33
92%
Yes
Engineering
(113)
(103)
Telecommunications
358
64%
330 (80)
28
98%
Yes
Engineering
(90)
Automotive
421
61%
400 (80)
21
56%
No
Engineering
(83)
Fundamentals of
374
69%
335 (80)
39
69%
No
Chemistry
(134)
Production
402
425
41%
-23
82%
No
Engineering
(92)
(101)
303
425
Food Science
11%
-122
100%
Yes
(62)
(101)
420
380
Computer Science
62%
40
100%
Yes
(94)
(125)
522
478
Total Aptitude
66%
44
100%
Yes
(83)
(105)
1 if confidence level

is less than 90%, it indicates that the difference between Campus Average and
National Average is not significant and that both the scores are equivalent.
Note: Industrial Engineering, Basic Computer Literacy and Information Gathering and Synthesis
modules are not considered as they were attempted by less than 5 students in your campus.

I. Inferences
1. English Comprehension
Communication is the key to building relationships and trust that leads
to success in business. English is a corporate language and hence, the
ability to read and comprehend this language effectively is essential
to qualify for all types of job profiles, whether it is technical or nontechnical. The students of your institute have done fairly well in English,
on an average, scoring slightly higher than the National Average. With
proper guidance and self-practice in English vocabulary and
communication skills, your students will be able to acquire excellence
and exceed the National Average by a larger difference. Recommended
methods are regular tests and assignments conducted by the faculty and
encouragement of communication in English.
2. Quantitative Ability
Quantitative Ability measures a person's ability to deal with numbers
and real-world problems quantitatively and mathematically. It is the
ability to convert a real world problem into equations which can then
be solved to find the result. This module is designed to measure a
candidate's basic maths and algebraic skills, his/her understanding of
basic quantitative concepts and his/her ability to reason quantitatively,
solve quantitative problems and interpret graphical data. Your campus
has shown good performance in Quantitative Ability module, on an
average, scoring higher than the National Average; but note that the
difference is not substantial. Your students should practice different
kinds of problems on different topics like numbers, decimals, probability,
logarithms, etc. This will help them to get a good hold of this area, which
in turn will help them score higher.
3. Logical Ability
The purpose of Logical Ability module is to test students' logical
reasoning skills and to check their intuitive ability, decision making
capability, problem solving approach and other areas which are
important from a company's perspective. People with strong Logical
Reasoning are quicker to perceive and interpret things objectively.
Therefore, proficiency in this module is desired for all job profiles. Scores
of your students in Logical Ability section are commendable. Although,
on an average, the scores are greater than the National Average, the
difference is not large. Our advice to students is to be motivated and
keep practicing various questions to master the section, which will help
them score higher and be way ahead of the National Average.
4. Computer Programming
Computer Programming module assesses a candidate's programming
skills. The sub-categories of this module are basics of programming,
data structures, object oriented programming and theoretical computer
science (complexity, data types, etc.). A high score in this module is an

indicator of proficiency in the role of software engineer or developer.

Your campus has shown outstanding performance in the computer
programming module, on an average, scoring significantly higher than
the National Average. Our analysis shows that the students have deep
understanding of the underlying concepts to be used in the given
problem and they can code well. To maintain their performance,
students should work consistently in this subject.
5. Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering
The Electronics and Semiconductor module tests the students'
understanding of analog and digital electronics. Students need expertise
in this area to pursue a career in fields such as VLSI Design, Embedded
Systems, Computer-Aided-Circuit Design - in general, the Semiconductor
and SOC industry. The topics included in this module are taught to
students pursuing Electronics/Electrical engineering. In some colleges,
it is also taught to students pursuing engineering in Computer Science,
Instrumentation, etc. On an average, the scores obtained by students of
your campus are slightly higher in comparison to the National Average
of students pursuing Electronics related disciplines. This is good, but
further improvement is required. It seems that the basic concepts of
the students are clear, but they need more practice of questions to
be proficient in applying the concepts. Giving weekly or bi-weekly
assignments to students and making them solve problems at the back of
every chapter from standard textbooks is a great way to further increase
the conceptual understanding of students and develop proficiency in
applying those concepts in various ways and situations.
6. Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical engineering module assesses a candidate's understanding
on core concepts including mechanics, kinematics, thermodynamics,
material science, structural analysis, etc. It requires a candidate to apply
the principles of physics and material science for analysis, design,
manufacturing and maintenance of mechanical systems. For any job
profile in core mechanical sector, a student is required to do well in this
module. The performance of your students is not satisfactory. Students,
on an average, have scored slightly lower than the national average.
Our analysis suggests that the students need to broaden their
understanding on the subject. We strongly suggest students to initially
concentrate on basic conceptual subjects like manufacturing science,
basic mechanics, etc before moving to more reasoning based subjects
like Thermodynamics, machine design etc.
7. Electrical Engineering
Electrical engineering module assesses a candidate's knowledge on a
range of subfields like analog and digital electronics, power engineering,
control systems and signal processing. The module deals with the study
and application of electricity, electronics and electromagnetism. In

order to build a career in fields such as Power sector, Control and

electronics, a student is expected to do well in this module. Your campus
has shown good performance in Electrical engineering module, on an
average, scoring higher than the National Average; but note that the
difference is not much. They should practice tougher numerical and
application based topics such as signals and systems, plots like Routhe,
Bode and Nyquist in control systems etc. This will enable them to get
a good hold over the subject which will, in turn, improve their scores
further.
8. Automotive Engineering
Automotive engineering module incorporates elements of mechanical,
electrical, electronic and safety engineering as applied to the design,
manufacture and operation of motorcycles, automobiles, cargo-trucks
etc. The module emphasizes on applied automobile design and testing,
experimental/scientific methods related to automobile engineering and
auto - Maintenance etc. Students need to do well in this module in
order to build career in profiles related to automobiles - design, research
and development and production. The performance of your students
has been decent with students, on an average, scoring equivalent to
the national average. Further improvement is possible if appropriate
corrective measures are taken. With proper guidance and regular
practice of more difficult topics - which have high numerical as well
as diagrammatic portion - like Clutches and Brakes, transmission &
differential systems and axle & steering systems, your students will be
able to exceed the National average.
9. Production Engineering
Production engineering module requires a candidate to have an
understanding of various manufacturing processes, metal cutting & tool
design, metrology, machine tools, Computer Integrated Manufacturing,
etc. Students need to be well versed in this area in order to pursue a
career in public and private sector manufacturing organizations engaged
in design, development and implementation of new production
processes, information and control systems, computer controlled
inspection, assembly and handling. Students of your institute, on an
average, have scored equivalent to the National Average in this
module. Our analysis suggests your students seem to have a basic
understanding of the subject but need to work on applications and
conceptual details of the subject. They should practice more on
automation, tool design and applications of various casting and joining
processes.

II. Performance Summary

From the above analysis, it is clearly visible that the performance of the students
at your campus is good in English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability, Logical
Ability, Computer Programming, Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering
and Electrical Engineering, which is commendable. They have performed
satisfactory in Automotive Engineering and Production Engineering, whereas
extra efforts can make a tremendous difference in performance. However, the
students' performance is not satisfactory in Mechanical Engineering, therefore
additional training sessions and corrective measures are required by the campus
authorities. Methodologies such as mock tests, assignments and extra classes
can become a valuable strategy for the benefit of students. The campus can also
include proactive mentoring sessions for weak students and review their skills in
the given area(s). Another approach can be to hold training sessions focusing on
comprehensive guidance for the students to excel in their weak areas. The gain
resulting from these training sessions and your continuous support will allow
overall development of the student and further enhancement in their abilities.

III. Training Suggestions

This section lists areas where your students need to improve on the basis of
their performance in the AMCAT. For each module, according to the degree of
improvement needed, appropriate suggestions have been provided.
Campus Training Requirement Table
Area to
Degree of
Improve Upon Improvement
English
Comprehension

Very Less

Quantitative
Ability

Very Less

Logical Ability

Very Less

Computer
Programming

Slight

Electronics and
Semiconductor
Engineering

Mechanical
Engineering

Very Less

Strong

Suggestion
Guide the students to scribble key points while
reading any passage/paragraph. This will help
them understand the essence of the text and
find answers to passage-based questions easily.
Real time problems on different topics should be
extensively discussed to equip the students with
different concepts.
Encourage students to solve different types of
puzzles and questions which need logical
thinking. Help them understand the problem
clearly in their minds before they start solving it.
Sharpen your students' skills by making them
design programs for complex problems. Try
giving them more challenging assignments.
One of the ways of teaching Electronics and
Semiconductor is to make students do a lot of
weekly or bi-weekly assignments. Students
should
practice
problems
from
the
aforementioned textbooks until them master
them. Electronics is an analytical subject like
mathematics. One cannot simply read and learn
it, it is application based and is best learnt by
doing.
One of the best ways to improve fundamental
skills in this module is by providing students with
direct hands on experience. Workshops and
machinery shops with appropriate facilities for
welding, metal cutting tools, lathes etc is one
possible solution. Manufacturing science and
Thermodynamics form the backbone of
mechanical engineering. For Manufacturing
science, we suggest students to initially
concentrate on all the manufacturing and metal

Area to
Degree of
Improve Upon Improvement

Electrical
Engineering

Very Less

Automotive
Engineering

Moderate

Production
Engineering

Moderate

Suggestion
cutting processes. 'Manufacturing Processes' by
Raghuvanshi is a good book to build concepts
pertaining
to
all
these
processes.
Thermodynamics, on other hand is more
reasoning based with high percentage of
numerical portion. The book we recommend for
this purpose is 'Thermodynamics' by Cengel and
Boles. Mechanical engineering is a practical
oriented branch with many real time
applications. So, it is important that the teaching
relates to such scenarios like understanding how
an object is moving, what is the principle behind
the working of a machine, etc.
In electrical engineering labs, students should be
encouraged to explore and assemble various
circuits, so that they can learn things practically.
Encourage students to join automotive
organizations/clubs like SAE and participate in
competitions like BAJA. These form a perfect
platform for students to apply their subject
knowledge. Organizing small workshops and
conducting industrial visits that provide real
world experience to students is one way of
enhancing student's knowledge.
Seminars and presentations on manufacturing
processes followed by various production
companies go a long way in strengthening the
knowledge and understanding of the students.
Industrial visits to large manufacturing or core
companies help a student to relate and apply
those theoretical concepts in real world
environment.

Section 2 - Students' Employability

This section gives you an approximate idea about the kind of companies your
students are competent for. This section also provides an insight into the criteria
used by different companies for their hiring process. Additionally, an estimate of
the employability of your campus students in different sectors is mentioned. In
order to improve employability prospects, domains in which your students need
to focus their efforts are also listed.

I. Perspective on Corporate Shortlisting Criteria

In this section, we discuss the different kind of job profiles available for fresh
graduates. For each domain, we discuss the nature of the job and the kinds of
skills required to succeed in the particular job profile.
IT Services
These types of service companies have large training setups of their
own. They provide system integration solutions, software application
development, testing solutions and many other services. For large
services companies, Computer Programming score is not an important
criterion. They look for candidates with acceptable English and Logical
Reasoning along with strong Quantitative Ability skills. A good score
in computer programming module is an advantage. HCL, TCS, Wipro,
Satyam, Polaris etc are some of the major large scale service based
companies.
IT Products
These types of product based companies analyze the future
requirements of market and come up with exact solutions and product
enhancements. That is, they develop their own products/applications
based on the market requirements. These companies primarily look for
good programming skills and quantitative ability. Since the job does
not include interaction with clients, they do not focus on good scores
in English. Yahoo, Microsoft, Texas Instruments, etc. are some of the
product based technology companies.
Electronics & Semiconductor
The companies in this sector provide job opportunities which fall under
one of these two categories: electrical power generation/transmission
and its application. One can further specialize in research, testing,
design & development or production & manufacturing. Most electrical

engineering strongly prefer candidates with a degree in electrical

engineering or related field and hence candidates are expected to have
sound domain knowledge apart from being stong in analytical &
problem solving skills.
ITeS and BPO
Business process outsourcing companies can be aptly defined as those
that act to utilize the services of a third party in order to perform its
back office operations. The BPO market is forecast to hit $450 billion by
2012. These companies look at moderate to outstanding/exceptionally
good English, depending on whether they have national or international
clients. The other parameters they use for short listing are acceptable
Logical Reasoning and Computer skills. GE Capital, Convergys, Wipro
Spectramind and Dell are some of the prominent BPO entities.
Hardware and Networking
These companies specialize in Hardware and Network Support and
basically provide integrated solutions for business enterprise
applications, networking equipment and network management. That is
they help manage organization's computing resources up and running.
These companies primarily look for average quantitative and logical
ability. Since the job does not include a lot of interaction with clients,
they do not necessarily require good scores in English Comprehension.
Cisco, Hewlett Packard, Nortel, NEC, Citrix and Netgear are some of the
Hardware/Networking companies.
KPO/Analyst
Knowledge Processing Outsourcing (popularly known as KPO) calls for
the application of specialized domain pertinent knowledge. KPO
business entities provide typical domain-based processes, advanced
analytical skills and business expertise, rather than just process
expertise. These companies look for an impressive command in English
and sound knowledge in both Quantitative and Logical Reasoning.
Evalueserve, Ugam Solutions, 24/7 Customer, ICICI OneSource, etc. are
some of the leading KPOs in India.
Automobile/Manufacturing Industry

Automotive engineers work in all aspects of a vehicle's design and

performance. The work could be broadly in one of the three categoriesproduct engineering, development engineering and manufacturing
engineering. This job requires the person to have strong analytical skills
and logical ability as it involves lot of data analysis before a new design
is developed. They should be good with English language and since this
is a specialized job profile, technical knowledge in this field is mandatory
which is assessed by the Mechanical Engineering module.
Telecom
The jobs in the telecom industry involve inspection and repair of any
equipment or service related to the field of voice, video and internet
communications. The work of this field is divided into maintenance
& repair, customer section, support section, installation section and
telecom engineers. Candidates interested in this field must be able to
solve problems and analyse complex situation, hence they are expected
to score high in Logical Ability and Quantitative Ability. It, being a
technical job, knowledge of the functioning of various equipment and
other technical details are tested by the Telecommunications module.
Software Quality
Software testers are responsible for testing of software programs to
ensure quality. They are required to review software requirements,
prepare test cases, execute them and report defects.
Electrical/Energy & Power
The jobs in this sector involves design, deployment and maintenance
of a broad range of electrical systems and equipment with a focus on
economy, safety, quality and relaibility. The skills required for the role of
electrical engineer include analytical skills, effective communication and
organizational skills and mastery in engineering skills.

II. Employability Prospects

The following table suggests the methods to be implemented in order to
improve employability of your students with reference to particular job profiles.
We have investigated what precise skills are deficient in students which make
them unemployable. These skills need to be improved through efforts of the
student and campus. Campus administration is requested to go through these
suggestions and implement them to make students more employable.
Campus Job Match Table
Percentage of
Students Eligible

Percentage of Students
Need Training

IT Services

64.6%

35.4%

IT Products

58.1%

41.9%

Electronics &
Semiconductor

38.5%

61.5%

ITeS and BPO

87.9%

12.1%

Hardware and
Networking

86.6%

13.4%

KPO/Analyst

35.9%

64.1%

Automobile/
Manufacturing Industry

24.2%

75.8%

Telecom

16.3%

83.7%

Software Quality

74.6%

25.4%

Electrical/Energy &
Power

53.3%

46.7%

Type of Company

III. Bird's-eye-view of Employability

The following table suggests the methods to be implemented in order to
improve employability of your students for each type of company. These
recommendations are provided on the basis of weak modules for each company,
which the faculty should work on to help their students. Campus is requested
to go through these suggestions and implement them to elevate the chances of
getting placed in that particular company.
Campus Employability Enhancement Table
Type of
Company

Campus
Employability
Prospect

IT Services

Medium

IT Products

Medium

Electronics &
Semiconductor

Medium

ITeS and BPO

High

Hardware and
Networking

High

KPO/Analyst

Medium

Areas in Need of Training for Improving

Employability Chances
These companies are basically looking for good
English and Logical skills with average
Quantitative ability. If employability prospects
is to be increased for this industry, campus
faculty will need to focus on English
Comprehension.
These companies are basically looking for good
English, Programming and Logical skills with
average Quantitative ability. To increase the
employability prospects for this industry, extra
efforts are required by the campus authority
on Computer Programming and English
Comprehension.
These companies look for candidates having
good knowledge of Electronics and
Semiconductors with good Logical and
Quantitative abilities. If employability prospects
is to be increased for this industry, campus
faculty will need to focus on Electronics and
Semiconductor Engineering and English
Comprehension.
These companies look for candidates proficient
in English with average Logical and Quantitative
abilities.
These companies are basically looking for
candidates with good English and average
Logical abilities.
These companies look for candidates having
proficiency in English with good Quantitative

Campus
Employability
Prospect

Type of
Company

Automobile/
Manufacturing
Industry

Low

Telecom

Low

Software
Quality

High

Electrical/
Energy
Power

&

Medium

Areas in Need of Training for Improving

Employability Chances
and
Reasoning
abilities.
For
better
employability prospects in this industry, your
students need to focus on English
Comprehension.
These companies are basically looking for
candidates with good English, Logical and
Quantitative ability along with proficiency in
Mechanical skills. If employability prospects is
to be increased for this industry, campus faculty
will need to focus on Mechanical Engineering
and English Comprehension.
These companies are basically looking for good
English, Logical, Quantitative skills along with
proficiency in Telecommunication. For better
employability prospects in this industry, your
students need to focus on Telecommunications
Engineering and English Comprehension.
This profile requires candidates with good
aptitude skills along with knowledge of
Computer Programming.
These companies look for candidates with good
knowledge of English, Logical and Quantitative
abilities with proficiency in Electrical
Engineering. For better employability prospects
in this industry, your students need to focus on
Quantitative Ability, Electrical Engineering and
English Comprehension.

Section 3 - Intra Campus Comparison

In this section, we will compare assessment scores to create a comprehensive
comparative analysis between different branches of a degree of your college.
This section shall explain the competitiveness of students of each degree, branch
and batch with others in the respective group.

I. Stream Comparison
In this section, we compare the AMCAT scores of students categorized by their
branch of study. Students from the following branches participated in AMCAT at
your college.
1. CSE
2. IT
3. ECE/ETC
4. EE/EEE
5. Mechanical Engineering

The chart below shows the comparison of module-wise average scores for each
stream. To interpret the chart, refer to the above illustration. Each horizontal bar
represents the average score along with the standard deviation of a particular
branch in that module. The vertical line at the center of each bar represents
the average score. The length of bar represents the range of scores obtained by
students of that stream.

Note: color bands are in order.

For each module, the following table lists the top scoring streams. Only the
modules which are common for all the streams have been considered in the
table.
Top Scoring Streams For Each Module
Rank

English
Comprehension

Quantitative
Ability

Computer
Programming

Logical Ability

Electronics and
Semiconductor
Engineering

Fundamentals of Computer
Chemistry
Science

EE/EEE

EE/EEE

EE/EEE

CSE

EE/EEE

ECE/ETC

IT

ECE/ETC

IT

CSE

IT

ECE/ETC

IT

CSE

Note: streams with less than 5 students have not been considered for the analysis.

On the basis of AMCAT scores obtained by different streams in your campus, we

make following inferences 1. English Comprehension
When it comes to English Comprehension, EE/EEE students have
grabbed the top position among all streams. CSE are the last rankers
with a difference of 12.47 percentile points. All the streams have
performed up to the mark when compared to the National Average.
2. Quantitative Ability
Candidates having EE/EEE as specialization have scored highest in
Quantitative Ability. IT students scored slightly lower than EE/EEE
students with a difference of 0.6 percentile points whereas Mechanical
Engineering students have scored significantly lower than EE/EEE with a
difference of 13.01 percentile points. All the streams have performed up
to the mark when compared to the National Average.
3. Logical Ability
When it comes to Logical Ability, EE/EEE students have grabbed the
top position among all streams. ECE/ETC are the last rankers with a
difference of 8.82 percentile points. If nationwide comparison is made,
then, on an average, all the streams have done fairly well with respect
to the National Average.
4. Computer Programming
When it comes to Computer Programming, CSE students have grabbed
the top position among all streams. Mechanical Engineering are the
last rankers with a difference of 8.71 percentile points. If nationwide
comparison is made, then, on an average, all the streams have done
fairly well with respect to the National Average.
5. Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering
Students of EE/EEE are the best performers in Electronics and
Semiconductor Engineering section in comparison to the ECE/ETC, who
lag behind by 3.87 percentile points If nationwide comparison is done,
then, on an average, both the streams have done fairly well with respect
to the National Average.
6. Fundamentals of Chemistry
ECE/ETC students have shown that they are the best when it comes to
the Fundamentals of Chemistry. IT students lag behind with a difference
of 32.52 percentile points. When compared with the National Average,
ECE/ETC students have, on an average, done better in this section. The
IT students need to pay more attention to this section as they have

underperformed.
7. Computer Science
When it comes to Computer Science, IT students have grabbed the
top position among all streams. EE/EEE are the last rankers with a
difference of 36.63 percentile points. When compared to the National
Average, ECE/ETC, CSE and IT students have done better in this section.
The EE/EEE students need to pay more attention to these areas as they
have underperformed.
In your campus, EE/EEE stream performed outstandingly well in maximum
number of modules. Also, Mechanical Engineering and ECE/ETC streams
performed poorly in maximum number of modules in comparison to other
streams, and therefore need special attention.

Aspiring Minds' Concluding Words

To summarize the overall analysis of your campus done by Aspiring Minds, keypoints from all sections are highlighted below:
The performance of the BE/Btech students in your campus is good in
English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability, Logical Ability, Computer
Programming, Electronics and Semiconductor Engineering and
Electrical Engineering, which is commendable. They have performed
satisfactory in Automotive Engineering and Production Engineering,
whereas extra efforts can make a tremendous difference in
performance. However, the students' performance is not satisfactory
in Mechanical Engineering, therefore additional training sessions and
corrective measures are required by the campus authorities.
It is clearly evident that 64.6%, 58.1%, 38.5%, 87.9%, 86.6%, 35.9%,
74.6% and 53.3% of your students are eligible to work in IT Services,
IT Products, Electronics & Semiconductor , ITeS and BPO, Hardware
and Networking, KPO/Analyst, Software Quality and Electrical/Energy
& Power which is good, however 24.2% and 16.3% of your students are
eligible to work in Automobile/Manufacturing Industry and Telecom
respectively which is an area of concern.
In your campus, EE/EEE stream performed outstandingly well in
maximum number of modules. Also, Mechanical Engineering and ECE/
ETC streams performed poorly in maximum number of modules in
comparison to other streams, and therefore need special attention.
The strongest recommendation Aspiring Minds will like to give is initiation of
classes to improve the weak areas of candidates. Apart from classes, regular
quizzes and special training sessions should also be initiated, where students
answer questions under time constraints. The classes should be student-friendly
so that the students are open to questions and are free to ask their doubts. Peer
teaching can be another way to increase the learning of students in the class
Along with increasing the employability of the institute, this will help your
students compete with other candidates in a more effective and efficient way.
With regard to areas where your students scored well, a sustained effort is
needed. Regular assignments of problems should be given so that the students
can accelerate their performance.
We strongly request the campus authorities to direct all students to follow the
performance feedback given by Aspiring Minds based on their AMCAT scores.
The campus authorities can go a long way in reminding students about their
strengths and weaknesses, thus encouraging them to uphold their strengths
and improve on their weaknesses. Consider special classes, better teaching

processes and focused courses so that students get a good platform to improve
and perform. We also strongly suggest conducting AMCAT again at campus after
4 months of dedicated hard work by students and campus authorities. This shall
give students a benchmark to improve themselves, and help us understand if the
initiated training program was useful. Of course, it would help students as well,
with better scores leading to better job opportunities.
We thank Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology for giving us an
opportunity to conduct AMCAT in their campus. For any clarification or further
analysis, we can be contacted at campus@aspiringminds.in or (91) 124 4148777.

Appendix
I. Candidates Score Table
The Candidates score table below shows the scores and percentile of all the
students of your campus tested on AMCAT. All scores lie between 100 and 900.
AMCAT Score, Percentile
Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

AMCAT ID

Name

30019996589305

A V N Amrusha

595

89 %

355

11 %

505

65
510
%

30019996729515

A. Sujay Teja

595

89 %

430

29 %

505

65
%

30019996797535

Aarthi Nagireddy

650

96 %

460

38 %

480

30019996709619

Abhijith Nagarjuna

630

94 %

550

68 %

30019996739583

Abhinav Ankesarapu

595

89 %

575

76 %

30019996764381

Abhiram Annapragada

720

99 %

800 100 % 530

74
885
%

30019996321000

Abhishek Sama

500

60 %

460

38 %

520

71
%

30019996536347

Addanki .

465

46 %

535

64 %

470

30019996914943

Aishwarya Penchala

455

42 %

340

9%

30019996684007

Ajay Juvvadi

605

90 %

370

30019996370539

Ajit Pattepu

440

36 %

30019996847787

Ajith B

605

30019996824126

Akhil Aluwala

30019996108027

83 %

292

41 %

452

70 %

438

91 %

562

98 %

460

64 %

56
685
%

99 %

438 68 %

545

79
670
%

99 %

377 49 %

580

87
%

292

41 %

260

8%

285 22 %

100 %

531 89 %

356

63 %

469

81 %

52
600
%

96 %

324

57 %

485

58
655
%

99 %

484

99 %

14 %

565

84
585
%

95 %

420

58 %

560

71 %

485

58
485
%

77 %

90 %

490

48 %

570

85
525
%

86 %

196

5%

350

11 %

620

86 %

485

58
755
%

100 %

469 76 %

Akhil Chowdary Ravuri

640

95 %

605

83 %

565

84
640
%

98 %

500 83 %

30019996887551

Akhila N

570

83 %

605

83 %

595

90
745
%

100 %

516

88 %

30019996365311

Akhila Murarishetti

535

73 %

620

86 %

570

85
860
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996453501

Akhitha Tumula

545

76 %

445

33 %

485

58
570
%

93 %

346 39 %

30019996880527

Akshay Godugu

420

29 %

340

9%

390

23
%

324

47 %

189

1%

30019996627583

Akshay A.n

735

100 %

740

98 %

570

85
785
%

100 %

562 93 %

30019996829423

Akshay Vyas

615

92 %

680

95 %

570

85
715
%

100 %

500 83 %

30019996496511

Alekhya Rangisetty

525

69 %

475

43 %

565

84
625
%

97 %

388

84 %

30019996411608

Alekhya Arava

385

18 %

505

54 %

470

52
585
%

95 %

315 30 %

30019996189311

Anirudh Dsari

570

83 %

635

89 %

605

92
700
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996630783

Anjani Sannidhanam

500

60 %

550

68 %

400

26
670
%

99 %

377 49 %

30019996400365

Ankamma
Vallabhapuram

525

69 %

445

33 %

615

93
%

408

84 %

380

33 %

30019996512863

Ankita Kulkarni

650

96 %

590

80 %

590

89
700
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996686039

Anuhya Mokkarala

700

99 %

505

54 %

510

67
%

484

99 %

388

45 %

285 22 %

30019996109305

Anuhya Kanukuntla

465

46 %

475

43 %

495

62
510
%

83 %

408 59 %

30019996753071

Anupama Vidalapati

675

98 %

650

91 %

615

93
785
%

100 %

420

92 %

30019996210518

Anusha Kothi

370

15 %

590

80 %

470

52
600
%

96 %

30019996166367

Anusha Tanniru

525

69 %

325

7%

555

81
485
%

77 %

228

15 %

324

47 %

30019996838463

Anuyukthi Manchikatla

580

85 %

520

59 %

520

71
525
%

86 %

30019996141283

Aparna Manda

525

69 %

590

80 %

595

90
800
%

100 %

30019996446975

Apuroop Tummala

570

83 %

605

83 %

530

74
830
%

100 %

30019996908285

Aravind Rao K

535

73 %

505

54 %

480

56
%

438

91 %

408

54 %

580

94 %

30019996329723

Arijit Desai

535

73 %

535

64 %

540

77
730
%

100 %

30019996474623

Arjun Bala

650

96 %

665

93 %

595

90
640
%

98 %

388

84 %

30019996305967

Aruna Eslampure

455

42 %

620

86 %

520

71
685
%

99 %

30019996216063

Asani Mamatha

325

7%

535

64 %

470

52
525
%

86 %

388

84 %

30019996151515

Ashley Gomez

675

98 %

490

48 %

505

65
755
%

100 %

324

57 %

30019996871406

Ashrit Deebadi

580

85 %

665

93 %

540

77
625
%

97 %

30019996862463

Ashwini Dombale

525

69 %

695

96 %

595

90
%

452

96 %

324

47 %

30019996560059

Ayatha Asritha

700

99 %

620

86 %

595

90
700
%

100 %

452

70 %

30019996646013

B Sowmya Reddy

560

80 %

605

83 %

530

74
640
%

98 %

30019996296895

Balakrishna Vangara

440

36 %

430

29 %

530

74
540
%

89 %

228

15 %

420

87 %

30019996373692

Bangari Bhavani

615

92 %

560

71 %

445

42
585
%

95 %

292

41 %

278

7
%

30019996619886

Basa Swetha

395

21 %

415

24 %

350

13
195
%

4%

388

84 %

30019996396759

Bhanuprakash Narra

580

85 %

650

91 %

540

77
745
%

100 %

30019996826685

Bhanusree Enimilla

500

60 %

370

14 %

445

42
440
%

64 %

377

72 %

260

5%

315 30 %
-

315 30 %
-

315 30 %
-

315 30 %
-

592 96 %
-

438 68 %

346 39 %

315 30 %

623 97 %
-

AMCAT Score, Percentile

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

AMCAT ID

Name

30019996950778

Bharath Kumar

395

21 %

520

59 %

580

87
500
%

30019996819867

Bharathi Sreeram

360

13 %

400

20 %

325

8
%

30019996945663

Bhargavi Akula

700

99 %

650

91 %

590

30019996625109

Bhargavi Chinthakunta

490

56 %

560

71 %

30019996512797

Bhavana Akula

595

89 %

520

30019996942575

Bhavana Ramaram

605

90 %

30019996185103

Bhavin Patel

465

30019996125823

Bhavya .

30019996894877

81 %

420

87 %

452

96 %

228

4%

315 30 %

89
845
%

100 %

469 76 %

485

58
440
%

64 %

315

43 %

59 %

510

67
730
%

100 %

605

83 %

555

81
685
%

99 %

420

92 %

46 %

300

5%

435

38
500
%

81 %

605

90 %

550

68 %

510

67
%

438

91 %

377

39 %

380

33 %

Bhavya .

665

97 %

545

67 %

480

56
510
%

83 %

452

96 %

30019996921203

Bindu Potluri

580

85 %

590

80 %

520

71
570
%

93 %

30019996769974

Borelly Azaharuddin

360

13 %

310

5%

520

71
755
%

100 %

260

27 %

30019996556238

Botla Kumar

475

50 %

680

95 %

520

71
%

500

98 %

438

68 %

340

20 %

30019996239583

Chaitanya Tummalapalli

535

73 %

665

93 %

595

90
440
%

64 %

292

41 %

30019996184027

Chaitanya Vanguru

465

46 %

490

48 %

420

33
700
%

100 %

30019996773021

Chandan Peranankila

475

50 %

530

62 %

460

48
670
%

99 %

420

92 %

324

22 %

30019996949211

Chandana Nisankara

595

89 %

620

86 %

545

79
900
%

100 %

30019996281087

Chandapuram Raj

385

18 %

475

43 %

460

48
470
%

73 %

356

72 %

30019996571123

Chandrashekhar
Rebbapragada

570

83 %

445

33 %

445

42
625
%

97 %

30019996175103

D.manasa Durishetty

350

11 %

270

3%

485

58
440
%

64 %

228

15 %

30019996785387

Das Tormati

370

15 %

520

59 %

460

48
585
%

95 %

388

84 %

260

19 %

30019996851958

Deeksha .

535

73 %

475

43 %

480

56
715
%

100 %

30019996248823

Deepa Megavath

385

18 %

445

33 %

420

33
525
%

86 %

324

57 %

228

10 %

30019996238398

Deepika Reddy

440

36 %

505

54 %

435

38
485
%

77 %

324

57 %

30019996292351

Deepthi Mamillapalli

570

83 %

615

93
815
%

100 %

531

99 %

30019996609642

Devan Tarun Kumar .

510

64 %

490

48 %

530

74
685
%

99 %

30019996626419

Dharani Reddy Patlola

420

29 %

385

17 %

455

46
485
%

77 %

322

44 %

30019996290724

Dhiren Guduru

475

50 %

560

71 %

540

77
500
%

81 %

30019996172367

Dinesh Yadav

630

94 %

665

93 %

555

81
%

469

96 %

500

89 %

30019996709039

Divakar Kareddy

580

85 %

735

98 %

565

84
800
%

100 %

388

84 %

30019996785407

Divya .

615

92 %

710

97 %

485

58
845
%

100 %

531 89 %

30019996144116

Divya Gaikwad

455

42 %

460

38 %

495

62
600
%

96 %

189

1
469 76 %
%

30019996106488

Divyasri .

580

85 %

400

20 %

530

74
570
%

93 %

292

41 %

30019996518131

Dj Teja

535

73 %

490

48 %

520

71
745
%

100 %

30019996549747

Doddi .

325

7%

240

1%

460

48
525
%

86 %

408

84 %

340

20 %

30019996799699

Farheen Begum

455

42 %

505

54 %

540

77
540
%

89 %

292

14 %

30019996647999

Ganesh Bolkonda

395

21 %

460

38 %

495

62
%

324

57 %

30019996833527

Gangishetty Raghav

545

76 %

680

95 %

615

93
670
%

99 %

408 59 %

30019996450479

Goda Mamilla

595

89 %

590

80 %

605

92
900
%

100 %

500 83 %

30019996249087

Gopi D

455

42 %

620

86 %

425

35
500
%

81 %

315 30 %

30019996438143

Greeshma Mamunuri

525

69 %

605

83 %

565

84
655
%

99 %

484

99 %

30019996293739

Gudem Siri

360

13 %

355

11 %

460

48
425
%

59 %

324

57 %

30019996753583

Haddunuri Manideep

580

85 %

695

96 %

590

89
830
%

100 %

30019996212979

Haresh Mandala

615

92 %

575

76 %

615

93
685
%

99 %

452

96 %

30019996920057

Hari A

745

100 %

725

98 %

570

85
900
%

100 %

548

100 %

30019996439803

Harika Gurram

350

11 %

415

24 %

460

48
%

324

57 %

192

7%

30019996926201

Harini A

440

36 %

285

3%

455

46
525
%

86 %

30019996583598

Haritha Chitikesh

665

97 %

785

99 %

615

93
745
%

100 %

356

72 %

30019996774039

Harsha Nampally

525

69 %

620

86 %

595

90
625
%

97 %

254

17 %

420

48 %

30019996247527

Harshasri Koturi

545

76 %

575

76 %

570

85
525
%

86 %

292

41 %

452

70 %

30019996581950

Harshini Anuganti

465

46 %

445

33 %

510

67
585
%

95 %

30019996782199

Harshita Padala

650

96 %

505

54 %

630

95
455
%

68 %

324

57 %

30019996811487

Hemanthkumar
Sreemanthula

510

64 %

400

20 %

435

38
540
%

89 %

356

72 %

30019996768500

Himasree .

615

92 %

810 100 % 495

62
700
%

100 %

484

99 %

30019996226303

Hitesh E

335

8%

325

7%

485

58
325
%

26 %

420

92 %

30019996256471

Hyndavi Tadepalli

560

80 %

635

89 %

505

65
845
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996312239

Jagadeeshwar Reddy K

360

13 %

355

11 %

530

74
770
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996317934

Jahnavi Prathipati

420

29 %

415

24 %

495

62
500
%

81 %

254 16 %

30019996630559

Jaithun Sheik

525

69 %

550

68 %

540

77
685
%

99 %

356

72 %

30019996196479

Jayaram Anu Priya .

475

50 %

300

5%

390

23
525
%

86 %

676 100 %

531 89 %
-

285 22 %

315 30 %

315 30 %
-

500 83 %
-

377 49 %

285 22 %

438 68 %
-

285 22 %

408 59 %

562 93 %

500 83 %

438 68 %

AMCAT Score, Percentile

AMCAT ID

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

Name

30019996180959

Jayasai Kishore Vutukury

580

85 %

520

71
700
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996318814

Jindam Kumar

525

69 %

620

86 %

590

89
900
%

100 %

654 99 %

30019996802759

Jupalli Reddy

630

94 %

665

93 %

510

67
640
%

98 %

438 68 %

30019996181967

K.prasannaraju Raju

395

21 %

355

11 %

435

38
%

438

91 %

285

8%

260

5%

30019996568702

K.sai Suraj .

710

99 %

620

86 %

520

71
770
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996660479

Kaki Gandhi

360

13 %

225

1%

340

11
525
%

86 %

346 39 %

30019996421820

Kalyani Ganji

545

76 %

385

17 %

395

24
485
%

77 %

377 49 %

30019996699511

Kambampati Sowmya

455

42 %

635

89 %

540

77
900
%

100 %

377 49 %

30019996292335

Kanna Pendlimadugu

405

24 %

590

80 %

455

46
685
%

99 %

420

92 %

30019996402167

Karan Shah

780

100 %

840 100 % 595

90
845
%

100 %

30019996328607

Karishma P

605

90 %

535

64 %

460

48
640
%

98 %

408

84 %

30019996242669

Kartheek Bodapatla

420

29 %

665

93 %

605

92
770
%

100 %

30019996681967

Karthik Sama

420

29 %

415

24 %

455

46
455
%

68 %

388

84 %

30019996840607

Karthik Vanama

440

36 %

635

89 %

530

74
%

500

98 %

420

48 %

30019996417726

Kasu Aishwarya

455

42 %

460

38 %

420

33
685
%

99 %

30019996464863

Kasula Goud

405

24 %

180

0%

435

38
310
%

22 %

408

84 %

300

11 %

30019996806587

Kavya Margam

630

94 %

550

68 %

445

42
600
%

96 %

531

99 %

460

64 %

30019996709310

Kavya Mangalampally

710

99 %

590

80 %

625

94
615
%

97 %

388

84 %

420

87 %

30019996388063

Kavya Lakshmi Movva

465

46 %

550

68 %

520

71
900
%

100 %

531 89 %

30019996637887

Keerthana Kondeti

545

76 %

520

59 %

455

46
570
%

93 %

408 59 %

30019996267243

Keerthi Reddy

430

33 %

210

1%

445

42
485
%

77 %

223 11 %

30019996864239

Keerthika Ravikanti

615

92 %

550

68 %

425

35
655
%

99 %

367

66 %

469 76 %

30019996789690

Khaja Iqbal

605

90 %

355

11 %

495

62
%

192

4%

380

33 %

30019996769980

Kiran Dogga

500

60 %

665

93 %

565

84
640
%

98 %

346 39 %

30019996947194

Kocherla Sreemati

395

21 %

560

71 %

460

48
615
%

97 %

254 16 %

30019996430891

Kongara Prasanna

490

56 %

385

17 %

420

33
440
%

64 %

469 76 %

30019996990431

Krishna B

245

0%

310

11 %

395

66 %

356

72 %

30019996361853

Krishna ....

315

6%

370

14 %

350

13
%

324

57 %

388

45 %

356

63 %

30019996149182

Krishna Priya Akella

650

96 %

505

54 %

590

89
%

452

96 %

548

93 %

377 49 %

30019996220526

Krishnaveni Thota

535

73 %

535

64 %

480

56
715
%

100 %

346 39 %

30019996454142

Kunaldeep Chauhan

780

100 %

560

71 %

545

79
395
%

48 %

260

27 %

30019996454480

L.vipla .

335

8%

235

1%

425

35
615
%

97 %

367

66 %

30019996881086

Lakshmi Rallapalli

605

90 %

505

54 %

590

89
615
%

97 %

469

96 %

30019996249649

Lakshmi Telkapalli

685

98 %

535

64 %

505

65
%

228

15 %

452

70 %

254 16 %

30019996459703

Lakshmi
Sai
Yarramneni

630

94 %

605

83 %

495

62
785
%

100 %

531 89 %

30019996254971

Lakshmi
Chappidi

595

89 %

430

29 %

485

58
700
%

100 %

531 89 %

30019996257719

Lalithej Vyasam

605

90 %

680

95 %

625

94
%

408

84 %

346

25 %

380

33 %

30019996297845

Laxmi Chintala

490

56 %

620

86 %

595

90
715
%

100 %

420

92 %

322

15
%

30019996621006

Laxmi Malipeddi

500

60 %

605

83 %

505

65
%

500

98 %

408

54 %

540

87 %

30019996309746

Lekha Cheruku

630

94 %

520

59 %

520

71
670
%

99 %

30019996237020

Likith Jagannadham

500

60 %

490

48 %

510

67
%

30019996337855

M A Sameer .

350

11 %

430

29 %

455

46
470
%

73 %

30019996437846

Madiraju .

465

46 %

475

43 %

470

52
570
%

93 %

388

84 %

278

7
%

30019996519155

Mahathi Yerramalli

605

90 %

475

43 %

570

85
815
%

100 %

388

84 %

30019996127837

Mahendar Yadav

510

64 %

710

97 %

505

65
670
%

99 %

260

27 %

30019996616445

Mahesh Vattipalli

560

80 %

535

64 %

565

84
900
%

100 %

531 89 %

30019996455151

Mahipal B

395

21 %

430

29 %

505

65
615
%

97 %

377 49 %

30019996467663

Maitreya Upputuri

490

56 %

695

96 %

565

84
640
%

98 %

285 22 %

30019996143318

Maitreyi Mareedu

615

92 %

560

71 %

605

92
470
%

73 %

420

92 %

580

96 %

30019996227259

Mamatha Thondapally

510

64 %

550

68 %

445

42
640
%

98 %

420

92 %

30019996106484

Manasa Mashetty

385

18 %

550

68 %

505

65
860
%

100 %

30019996902111

Manasa Peddapalli

315

6%

325

7%

520

71
585
%

95 %

452

70 %

30019996507774

Maneesh Vuppugalla

560

80 %

460

38 %

470

52
510
%

83 %

346 39 %

30019996427233

Maneesha Kondisetty

605

90 %

560

71 %

595

90
640
%

98 %

315 30 %

30019996497630

Manikya Veena Kompella

665

97 %

620

86 %

605

92
885
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996691957

Manupati Sandhya

405

24 %

270

3%

425

35
440
%

64 %

484

99 %

30019996615166

Md Shadul

595

89 %

550

68 %

555

81
715
%

100 %

452

96 %

452

94 %

30019996757160

Medisetti Vamsi

665

97 %

590

80 %

435

38
585
%

95 %

377 49 %

30019996570861

Meera Gupta

465

46 %

550

68 %

555

81
770
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996380927

Meghana Yannam

640

95 %

340

9%

505

65
555
%

91 %

324

57 %

Sree
Sravanthi

500 83 %
-

377 49 %

562 93 %

315 30 %
-

500 83 %
-

408 59 %

377 49 %
-

167 1 % 367

13 %

AMCAT Score, Percentile

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

AMCAT ID

Name

30019996621231

Meghana Jangili

595

89 %

400

20 %

470

52
500
%

81 %

452

96 %

30019996658303

Meghana Ashoda

475

50 %

385

17 %

480

56
500
%

81 %

324

57 %

324

47 %

30019996774135

Michelle Currie

605

90 %

255

2%

435

38
525
%

86 %

228

15 %

420

87 %

30019996475124

Mohammed
Mohiuddin

570

83 %

635

89 %

590

89
%

420

92 %

516

88 %

30019996483141

Mohd Ali

360

13 %

270

3%

395

24
510
%

83 %

30019996838075

Moksha Shah

595

89 %

560

71 %

570

85
585
%

95 %

356

72 %

484

97 %

30019996108509

Mounika Kankipati

490

56 %

460

38 %

540

77
470
%

73 %

356

72 %

30019996522875

Mounika Pilli

465

46 %

430

29 %

520

71
%

469

96 %

315 30 %

30019996239419

Mrinmoy Dalal

755

100 %

735

98 %

520

71
900
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996930743

Mudhigonda Kumar

315

6%

490

48 %

460

48
770
%

100 %

388

84 %

30019996970689

Murlidhar Sarda

510

64 %

530

62 %

590

89
615
%

97 %

438 68 %

30019996950695

Nagender Getti

440

36 %

575

76 %

425

35
455
%

68 %

500 83 %

30019996174078

Navya Jakkula

360

13 %

535

64 %

510

67
585
%

95 %

469 76 %

30019996224127

Navya Pitta

465

46 %

620

86 %

470

52
625
%

97 %

356

72 %

30019996285439

Neehar Barkam

770

100 %

680

95 %

580

87
625
%

97 %

292

41 %

324

47 %

30019996409508

Neha Somalanka

370

15 %

460

38 %

425

35
470
%

73 %

388

84 %

516

88 %

30019996279551

Nehanth Ravipati

570

83 %

340

9%

565

84
%

438

91 %

380

33 %

30019996884558

Neti Soujanya

440

36 %

475

43 %

485

58
470
%

73 %

30019996396270

Nikhil Valluri

570

83 %

545

67 %

565

84
600
%

96 %

516

100 %

484

97 %

30019996710567

Nikhil Muppidi

415

27 %

635

89 %

410

29
670
%

99 %

30019996354303

Nikhil Gunda

500

60 %

680

95 %

570

85
%

452

96 %

452

94 %

30019996740247

Nikhila Vinjamuri

465

46 %

560

71 %

495

62
745
%

100 %

408 59 %

30019996751478

Nikhila Mahendra

535

73 %

445

33 %

425

35
485
%

77 %

367

28
469 76 %
%

30019996713315

Nikhilesh Munthala

640

95 %

385

17 %

595

90
570
%

93 %

377 49 %

30019996843711

Nikhitha Dommati

630

94 %

695

96 %

590

89
870
%

100 %

500 83 %

30019996293870

Nikitha Reddyshetty

545

76 %

620

86 %

615

93
770
%

100 %

623 97 %

30019996901950

Nikitha Madini

490

56 %

415

24 %

395

24
485
%

77 %

420

92 %

196

5%

30019996198591

Nishant Donakonda

735

100 %

770

99 %

570

85
800
%

100 %

612

100 %

452

94 %

30019996199623

Nishma Kondabolu

405

24 %

225

1%

250

2
%

210

5%

388

84 %

30019996751615

Nitin Chencharapu

525

69 %

665

93 %

520

71
655
%

99 %

356

72 %

30019996990655

P.

605

90 %

385

17 %

505

65
510
%

83 %

420

92 %

30019996537825

Paka Prasanna

570

83 %

680

95 %

505

65
715
%

100 %

388

84 %

30019996771581

Pampari Bhavana

360

13 %

285

3%

455

46
525
%

86 %

233

10 %

408 59 %

30019996714607

Pamukuntla Bindu

560

80 %

590

80 %

505

65
655
%

99 %

315 30 %

30019996326879

Pavan Amgoth

535

73 %

300

5%

505

65
600
%

96 %

408 59 %

30019996449535

Pavan Kumar Meegada

465

46 %

575

76 %

565

84
510
%

83 %

388

84 %

285 22 %

30019996329719

Phani Manoj Pvns

440

36 %

665

93 %

545

79
700
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996886142

Pinninti Triveni

570

83 %

665

93 %

520

71
730
%

100 %

562 93 %

30019996537437

Pooja Gunti

465

46 %

590

80 %

565

84
640
%

98 %

260

27 %

516

99 %

30019996257983

Pooja Waghmare

430

33 %

825 100 % 555

81
685
%

99 %

30019996310268

Poojitha Reddy

580

85 %

550

68 %

435

38
625
%

97 %

292

41 %

30019996915442

Pramada Nadagouni

650

96 %

635

89 %

580

87
655
%

99 %

324

57 %

30019996650873

Pranavi Anugu

525

69 %

545

67 %

530

74
625
%

97 %

30019996979559

Pranay Pola

440

36 %

490

48 %

470

52
%

388

84 %

420

87 %

500

98 %

30019996793067

Prashanth Nagapuri

465

46 %

635

89 %

435

38
%

30019996617311

Pratibhaa Kandimalla

580

85 %

650

91 %

505

65
625
%

97 %

377 49 %

30019996175086

Pravalika Pyatla

570

83 %

750

99 %

605

92
815
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996871103

Pravallika Munnangi

535

73 %

475

43 %

530

74
625
%

97 %

388

84 %

30019996518143

Prithvi B.v

675

98 %

430

29 %

460

48
510
%

83 %

260

27 %

30019996608942

Priyanka Yerra

500

60 %

475

43 %

595

90
555
%

91 %

30019996765944

Prudhvi Panthangi

580

85 %

550

68 %

410

29
%

356

72 %

324

47 %

30019996633310

Puranam Devi

280

3%

375

19
%

377

72 %

300

11 %

30019996606207

R Vani .

475

50 %

635

89 %

520

71
600
%

96 %

388

84 %

452

70 %

30019996746233

Radhika Nossely

570

83 %

385

17 %

520

71
640
%

98 %

420

92 %

356

63 %

30019996496319

Raghu .

325

7%

225

1%

315

7
%

356

72 %

292

14 %

30019996646391

Raja Raviteja Katkam

630

94 %

535

64 %

590

89
670
%

99 %

260

19 %

30019996728015

Rajashree Laha

545

76 %

740

98 %

545

79
655
%

99 %

228

15 %

516

99 %

30019996406399

Rajasree Jinde

500

60 %

620

86 %

555

81
615
%

97 %

500

98 %

420

48 %

30019996917743

Rakesh Boya

570

83 %

445

33 %

605

92
525
%

86 %

356

72 %

388

77 %

Aamair

346 39 %

377 49 %
-

346 39 %
-

315 30 %

500 83 %

531 89 %

438 68 %

AMCAT Score, Percentile

AMCAT ID

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

Name

30019996709501

Rakesh Perne

525

69 %

460

38 %

495

62
625
%

97 %

408 59 %

30019996328670

Rakesh Rao Chitagoru

665

97 %

620

86 %

480

56
585
%

95 %

469 76 %

30019996128814

Ramdass
Vidhya .

630

94 %

505

54 %

420

33
615
%

97 %

500 83 %

30019996995321

Rampalli Sharma

615

92 %

545

67 %

565

84
730
%

100 %

356

72 %

388

77 %

30019996101341

Ramya Talagama

370

15 %

680

95 %

470

52
570
%

93 %

346

58 %

420

48 %

30019996441195

Ramya Gudepu

580

85 %

310

5%

470

52
500
%

81 %

438 68 %

30019996170979

Ramya Kamarajugadda

510

64 %

520

59 %

520

71
670
%

99 %

469 76 %

30019996105422

Ranga .

465

46 %

725

98 %

555

81
770
%

100 %

324

57 %

623 97 %

30019996804286

Ravali Yeravelli

560

80 %

560

71 %

510

67
570
%

93 %

324

57 %

260

19 %

30019996721908

Ravali Vudutha

440

36 %

735

98 %

590

89
%

484

99 %

420

87 %

30019996773599

Ravali Sudamalla

385

18 %

355

11 %

495

62
525
%

86 %

233

10 %

30019996313851

Ravali Gaddam

455

24 %

400

31 %

98 %

356

72 %

484

97 %

Saikumar

89
590
%

555

30019996429054

Ravikiran Karnati

500

60 %

30019996635767

Rinith Pakala

560

80 %

725

98 %

565

84
770
%

30019996386805

Ritu Shukla

385

18 %

225

1%

250

2
%

30019996880479

Rohini Avadhanula

360

13 %

490

48 %

30019996718576

Rohit Kumar Boddu

630

94 %

650

30019996515827

Roja .

405

24 %

30019996876383

Roopa Mocherla

490

30019996555007

Rupa .

30019996566142
30019996267124
30019996565120

S
Gowtham
Vidiyala

30019996932095

99 %

356

72 %

356

63 %

356

72 %

210

5%

292

41 %

485

58
540
%

89 %

91 %

505

65
655
%

99 %

452

70 %

650

91 %

460

48
485
%

77 %

356

72 %

56 %

710

97 %

485

58
655
%

99 %

377 49 %

395

10 %

255

4%

260

27 %

292

14 %

346 39 % 233 3 % 500

Rushi S

370

15 %

545

67 %

530

74
510
%

83 %

388

84 %

Rutwik Jangam

570

83 %

415

24 %

580

87
800
%

100 %

408 59 %

525

69 %

445

33 %

520

71
770
%

100 %

469 76 %

S.snehasri Sattu

430

33 %

325

7%

325

8
%

455

68 %

324

57 %

30019996537526

Sachin Belide

525

69 %

605

83 %

545

79
715
%

100 %

315 30 %

30019996274366

Sahaja Gottipati

510

64 %

605

83 %

510

67
670
%

99 %

654 99 %

30019996487290

Sahith Penchala

315

6%

340

9%

460

48
555
%

91 %

469 76 %

30019996393175

Sahithi Maheshwaram

605

90 %

575

76 %

595

90
570
%

93 %

469 76 %

30019996979647

Sahithi Kusuma

405

24 %

535

64 %

425

35
570
%

93 %

233

10 %

438 68 %

30019996933503

Sahitya Chalamchala

665

97 %

520

59 %

555

81
615
%

97 %

531 89 %

30019996605175

Sai P

395

21 %

590

80 %

530

74
%

292

41 %

260

19 %

367

28
%

30019996205438

Sai Cherukuri

560

80 %

475

43 %

565

84
455
%

68 %

324

57 %

322

44 %

30019996159733

Sai Guntuka

630

94 %

535

64 %

570

85
585
%

95 %

324

57 %

30019996286684

Sai Santhosh

605

90 %

695

96 %

435

38
640
%

98 %

228

15 %

324

47 %

30019996647415

Sai Pasalapudi

615

92 %

810 100 % 530

74
845
%

100 %

715

100
%

30019996426870

Sai Aditya Vardhan Ale

735

100 %

635

89 %

570

85
670
%

99 %

388

77 %

30019996354238

Sai Chaitanya Mankala

675

98 %

680

95 %

565

84
845
%

100 %

377 49 %

30019996981951

Sai Krishna
Davuluri

Bhargavi

525

69 %

710

97 %

630

95
700
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996263161

Sai Phani
Kanukuntla

Meghana

525

69 %

560

71 %

480

56
440
%

64 %

377

72 %

300

11 %

30019996561847

Sai Samedh
Pishka

545

76 %

650

91 %

530

74
655
%

99 %

324

57 %

30019996519677

Sai Saurabh Singh Thakur

510

64 %

605

83 %

545

79
770
%

100 %

30019996262103

Sai Spandana Dadi

745

100 %

755

99 %

630

95
%

420

92 %

388

77 %

30019996931835

Saipraneeth
Bhukyavathu

630

94 %

575

76 %

510

67
570
%

93 %

196

8%

30019996667130

Saisudha Reddy

490

56 %

560

71 %

555

81
700
%

100 %

30019996492991

Saisushma Pasupuleti

675

98 %

650

91 %

520

71
655
%

99 %

260

8%

30019996482815

Sameer Murala

850

100 %

620

86 %

555

81
700
%

100 %

388

84 %

500 83 %

30019996701871

Sandeepreddy Shabad

465

46 %

415

24 %

340

11
395
%

48 %

500 83 %

30019996715455

Sandhya Muralidhar

665

97 %

650

91 %

595

90
540
%

89 %

356

72 %

30019996658271

Sangam .

360

13 %

355

11 %

495

62
570
%

93 %

377 49 %

30019996828286

Sarvani K

545

76 %

490

48 %

505

65
700
%

100 %

438 68 %

30019996288490

Sathya Chintakindi

510

64 %

560

71 %

480

56
540
%

89 %

484

80 %

30019996141307

Satya Sravya Ch

630

94 %

800 100 % 655

97
715
%

100 %

367

66 %

30019996975867

Satya Vinod T

535

73 %

255

2%

375

19
395
%

48 %

196

8%

324

47 %

30019996436087

Satyadev Komaragiri

640

95 %

590

80 %

565

84
845
%

100 %

30019996770495

Shailaja .

385

18 %

310

5%

455

46
485
%

77 %

324

22 %

30019996664974

Shanmukha Kota

710

99 %

590

80 %

470

52
860
%

100 %

30019996514979

Shanmukha Kotha

535

73 %

635

89 %

615

93
%

30019996264949

Sharanya Kotagiri

465

46 %

605

83 %

505

65
755
%

100 %

408 59 %

30019996234143

Sharanya Sagadam Venu

665

97 %

575

76 %

615

93
730
%

100 %

377 49 %

30019996341398

Shashidhar Erri

525

69 %

695

96 %

505

65
500
%

81 %

377 49 %

Kumar

Mohan

315 30 %

500 77 % 633

100 %

408 59 %

285 22 %

346 39 %

315 30 %

408 59 %

377 49 %
-

408 59 %
-

531 89 %
-

654 99 %
-

75 %

AMCAT Score, Percentile

AMCAT ID

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

Name

30019996546165

Shayideep Sangam

430

33 %

695

96 %

495

62
625
%

97 %

633

100 %

30019996666603

Shilpa Sirimalle

455

42 %

460

38 %

520

71
555
%

91 %

388

84 %

30019996874179

Shireesha R

665

97 %

800 100 % 590

89
670
%

99 %

30019996292703

Shiva Regalagadda

560

80 %

620

86 %

580

87
715
%

100 %

30019996563186

Shiva Reddy

395

21 %

385

17 %

505

65
570
%

93 %

30019996864470

Shivani Jangam

465

46 %

490

48 %

480

56
500
%

81 %

260

27 %

388

45 %

30019996291159

Shourya Madishetty

510

64 %

680

95 %

570

85
655
%

99 %

30019996847805

Shravan Kumar

525

69 %

520

59 %

420

33
%

223

9%

30019996823039

Shreya Chigulapalli

685

98 %

590

80 %

520

71
755
%

100 %

30019996861150

Shruthi Konda

605

90 %

535

64 %

510

67
540
%

89 %

30019996296823

Siddharth Padmanabhan

510

64 %

770

99 %

565

84
900
%

100 %

30019996831967

Siddi Kumar

315

6%

490

48 %

370

17
485
%

77 %

292

41 %

30019996390655

Sindhu Nakarakommula

510

64 %

415

24 %

470

52
555
%

91 %

356

72 %

30019996492893

Singotam Kumar

420

29 %

385

17 %

350

13
540
%

89 %

292

41 %

30019996446093

Sirigiri Swathi

430

33 %

255

2%

435

38
%

260

27 %

228

4%

30019996489085

Siva Pendekanti

525

69 %

505

54 %

530

74
640
%

98 %

30019996565119

Sneha Nalla

615

92 %

665

93 %

580

87
600
%

96 %

356

72 %

30019996834541

Sneha Rao

465

46 %

180

0%

420

33
%

30019996491419

Sneha Katukuri

475

50 %

605

83 %

520

71
730
%

100 %

356

72 %

30019996739311

Snigdha Vadlamudi

640

95 %

475

43 %

485

58
%

30019996390139

Soni Valishetty

535

73 %

520

59 %

530

74
455
%

68 %

30019996697727

Soumya Darbha

500

60 %

415

24 %

510

67
655
%

30019996776147

Sowmya Kuchipudi

455

42 %

370

14 %

495

62
%

30019996587221

Sowmya Jeevanigi

545

76 %

520

59 %

510

30019996786013

Sowmya Bachu

350

11 %

120

0%

30019996871242

Spandhana Maddi

290

3%

325

30019996525163

Sravani Addagatla

465

27 %

30019996904687

Sravya Pokala

475

30019996323071

Sri Bobba

720

30019996120766

Sri Karan Reddy Pailla

30019996552695

592 96 %

592 96 %

285 22 %

300

11 %

408 59 %

408 59 %

562 93 %

260

19 %

356

63 %

292

32 %

322

44 %

346

58 %

500

77 %

388

84 %

99 %

346

58 %

285 22 %

67
755
%

100 %

346 39 %

375

19
500
%

81 %

292

41 %

228

10 %

7%

445

42
385
%

45 %

325

13 %

525

96 %

324

57 %

420

87 %

50 %

550

68 %

570

85
655
%

99 %

99 %

725

98 %

565

84
485
%

77 %

292

14 %

580

85 %

445

33 %

580

87
785
%

100 %

Srichandana Mahakala

665

97 %

620

86 %

520

71
670
%

99 %

30019996276415

Sricharani Aleti

440

36 %

575

76 %

565

84
485
%

77 %

356

72 %

30019996213750

Srikanya Mara

535

73 %

560

71 %

470

52
510
%

83 %

452

96 %

420

87 %

30019996206293

Srikrishna Brahmadevara

525

69 %

520

59 %

615

93
785
%

100 %

420

92 %

589

100 %

30019996181245

Srilasya Janagama

615

92 %

740

98 %

580

87
755
%

100 %

30019996596988

Srimayee G

560

80 %

650

91 %

510

67
615
%

97 %

30019996814054

Srivalli Mellacheruvu

545

76 %

650

91 %

625

94
625
%

97 %

484

99 %

30019996666623

Srivani Battu

455

42 %

415

24 %

435

38
655
%

99 %

30019996752616

Sriveena .

535

73 %

590

80 %

595

90
640
%

98 %

30019996893933

Sudheer Kotikalapudi

430

33 %

575

76 %

510

67
455
%

68 %

260

27 %

30019996579519

Sumanth Noulla

560

80 %

635

89 %

510

67
685
%

99 %

292

41 %

30019996215807

Sumanth Gujjaru

440

36 %

550

68 %

360

15
485
%

77 %

30019996790514

Sunil Addakula

465

46 %

535

64 %

400

26
785
%

100 %

30019996823255

Sunil Mitkari

475

50 %

605

83 %

540

77
815
%

100 %

30019996229230

Supriya Dara

510

64 %

355

11 %

480

56
570
%

93 %

30019996704189

Supriya Boorugu

580

85 %

560

71 %

590

89
600
%

96 %

408

84 %

540

87 %

30019996746159

Supriya Boga

350

11 %

325

7%

505

65
700
%

100 %

30019996673999

Sushma Dharmagadi

630

94 %

605

83 %

595

90
%

438

91 %

30019996155497

Sushma Palem

475

50 %

535

64 %

555

81
670
%

99 %

420

92 %

388

77 %

30019996266741

Sushma
Devaraboina

490

56 %

475

43 %

510

67
625
%

97 %

452

96 %

580

100 %

30019996464887

Swamy Dhama

430

33 %

560

71 %

530

74
585
%

95 %

420

92 %

30019996841391

Swarna Komakula

490

56 %

400

20 %

625

94
700
%

100 %

30019996574974

Swetha Gantala

545

76 %

550

68 %

520

71
655
%

99 %

30019996137720

Swetha Thota

440

36 %

515

57 %

530

74
500
%

81 %

346

58 %

460

64 %

30019996143350

Swetha Rani P

535

73 %

590

80 %

565

84
815
%

100 %

420

92 %

30019996718133

Tamanam Jessica

475

50 %

535

64 %

565

84
640
%

98 %

228

15 %

260

19 %

30019996432828

Tasneem Shaik

510

64 %

475

43 %

470

52
540
%

89 %

30019996187671

Tejasree Mummareddy

560

80 %

590

80 %

605

92
670
%

99 %

30019996114493

Tejaswi Katukuri

455

42 %

575

76 %

570

85
640
%

98 %

420

58 %

30019996826101

Tejaswini Boppana

500

60 %

590

80 %

495

62
510
%

83 %

356

72 %

Latha

408 59 %
-

623 97 %
-

438 68 %
-

438 68 %

433 53 % 767 100 %

-

438 68 %

408 59 %

408 59 %

408 59 %

438 68 %

346 39 %

469 76 %

377 49 %

500 83 %

315 30 %

438 68 %

285 22 %

531 89 %

377 49 %

315 30 %

469 76 %

AMCAT Score, Percentile

AMCAT ID

Electronics
Information
Basic
English
Quantitative Logical
Computer
and
Mechanical Electrical Telecommunications Automotive Fundamentals Industrial Production Food Computer
Gathering
Computer
Comprehension
Ability
Ability Programming Semiconductor Engineering Engineering
Engineering
Engineering of Chemistry Engineering Engineering Science Science
and
Literacy
Engineering
Synthesis

Name

30019996360413

Titus J.c

615

92 %

460

38 %

530

74
570
%

93 %

292

41 %

292

32 %

30019996581999

Tummala Tejaswini

755

100 %

635

89 %

565

84
745
%

100 %

324

57 %

30019996237567

Uma Marati

315

6%

535

64 %

445

42
600
%

96 %

408 59 %

30019996420602

Umesh Nimmathi

455

42 %

535

64 %

505

65
900
%

100 %

377 49 %

30019996570352

Upputurivanaja .

360

13 %

355

11 %

540

77
570
%

93 %

408 59 %

30019996474103

Urmila Bista

605

90 %

385

17 %

460

48
485
%

77 %

260

27 %

388

77 %

30019996851727

Vaibhav Kulkarni

395

21 %

445

33 %

480

56
570
%

93 %

469 76 %

30019996369407

Vaibhav Bejju

580

85 %

460

38 %

455

46
440
%

64 %

315 30 %

30019996400372

Vaishnavi Bathina

545

76 %

635

89 %

625

94
830
%

100 %

292

41 %

30019996845567

Vaishnavi Tupran

735

100 %

590

80 %

595

90
800
%

100 %

469 76 %

30019996448477

Vamshi Kaithi

710

99 %

695

96 %

595

90
800
%

100 %

377 49 %

30019996663533

Vani Katreddy

465

46 %

550

68 %

445

42
510
%

83 %

324

57 %

30019996588790

Vani Rabba

560

80 %

575

76 %

555

81
540
%

89 %

420

58 %

30019996698746

Varsha Maddur

640

95 %

535

64 %

595

90
685
%

99 %

30019996297463

Vasundhara Chinnagappa
Gari

370

15 %

270

3%

460

48
455
%

68 %

292

41 %

228

10 %

30019996517887

Venkata Neelakantam

465

46 %

505

54 %

495

62
785
%

100 %

30019996200319

Venkata Bala Potnuri

630

94 %

665

93 %

590

89
%

452

96 %

580

96 %

30019996142254

Venkatesh Dhara

405

24 %

415

24 %

460

48
%

228

15 %

30019996451071

Vidya Reddy

525

69 %

755

99 %

570

85
625
%

97 %

30019996632266

Vijay Singh

290

3%

445

33 %

450

44
%

324

57 %

30019996881611

Vijetha Chanumolu

465

46 %

635

89 %

545

79
%

420

92 %

260

19 %

30019996933721

Vinay Thotakuri

440

36 %

490

48 %

545

79
525
%

86 %

420

92 %

30019996354295

Vindhya Pentaparthy

440

36 %

445

33 %

520

71
525
%

86 %

377 49 %

30019996721119

Vinesh Tatineni

430

33 %

430

29 %

480

56
685
%

99 %

408 59 %

30019996975359

Vinod Tarun Gampala

570

83 %

605

83 %

485

58
625
%

97 %

500 83 %

30019996470359

Vishal Vardhan

475

50 %

535

64 %

460

48
%

322

15
315 30 %
%

30019996294143

Vishal Ganji

615

92 %

740

98 %

565

84
785
%

100 %

324

57 %

30019996300497

Vishnu Mangalampalli

420

29 %

590

80 %

445

42
685
%

99 %

388

84 %

30019996608199

Vishnu
Brahmandam

650

96 %

430

29 %

605

92
685
%

99 %

285 22 %

30019996209915

Wurity Patnaik

535

73 %

285

3%

485

58
570
%

93 %

408 59 %

30019996256916

Yada Rashmitha

490

56 %

550

68 %

520

71
640
%

98 %

346 39 %

30019996192927

Yashwanth Varakala

490

56 %

475

43 %

485

58
585
%

95 %

324

57 %

292

32 %

30019996928382

Yasmeen Mohmmed

465

46 %

325

7%

495

62
525
%

86 %

438

91 %

540

87 %

30019996475117

Yellu Reddy

605

90 %

665

93 %

545

79
815
%

100 %

Rohitha

377 49 %
-

377 49 %

531 89 %

500 83 %

II. Statistical Significance (Confidence)

All score distributions generally follow a pattern called the Gaussian curve. The
Gaussian curve is by far the most common assumption with regard to score
distribution. For the purpose of comparison, we express AMCAT scores as
Gaussian distribution. The most characteristic feature of this distribution is that
the scores for maximum number of students fall in a very narrow range around
the average value.
The percentage of scores lying in the range falls exponentially as we move away
from the average value. The confidence percentage, which ranges from 0% to
100%, is indicative of the possibility that the difference in scores is by chance.
A high confidence percentage indicates that it is very likely that the difference
observed is real and not by chance. In this analysis, we classify differences, with
confidence 90% or higher, as significantly different (that is, not by chance).

III. National Average (Norm)

To construct the norms (National average & standard deviation), balanced
sampling was used to select more than 25000 students tested by Aspiring Minds
nationwide. Balanced sampling technique ensures that the selected candidates
are representative of entry-level job-aspirants over 22 states in India. It is
ensured that the sample contains different degrees, specializations, genders,
regions, etc. in the same composition as the National distribution.
To summarize score distribution of the norms and Sreenidhi Institute of Science
and Technology students, two values (statistics) are used: average of the scores
and standard deviation of the scores. While the former value indicates what,
on average, candidates score in the test, the latter value tells how much do
scores deviate from the average. High value of standard deviation means that
the scores are dissimilar and spread across the scale. In contrast, a low value of
standard deviation means that candidates scores are similar to each other and
lie near the average.

IV. Variance (Standard Deviation)

The variance (or standard deviation) is a measure of how spread out a
distribution is. In other words, it is the measure of variability. A low standard
deviation indicates that the data points tend to be very close to the average
value, while high standard deviation indicates that the data is spread out over a
large range of values.

V. About Aspiring Minds

Aspiring Minds was founded in 2007 by alumni of IIT and MIT (USA) with a
vision to introduce scientific assessment methodology to bring together jobseekers and campuses across India on a common standardized platform that
is recognized by multiple companies on a national level. The aim of Aspiring
Minds is to highlight the pool of talented students and progressive campuses
to corporates nationally, provide an insight on how they can improve their
employability and help them acquire jobs on the basis of their potential. In a
short span of time, Aspiring Minds has earned credibility and is working with
multiple corporations such as Microsoft Research, HCL Technologies, MPhasiS
EDS, Erricson, Tata Motors, Aricent, Genpact, iGATE, L&T Finance, Sapient,
Godrej Agrovet and Tavant Technologies.
Board of Advisors
Prof. Tarun Khanna, HBS, USA
Dr. Una-May O'Reilly, MIT, USA
Dr. Vijay Bhushan, PhD., UIUC, USA