You are on page 1of 17

H1:Positive social media consumption will lead to increase brand engagement.

Q14

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media engagements


by specific automobile
brands motivate to buy that

50

2.48

1.233

.174

product

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media engagements


by specific automobile brands 11.356

49

.000

1.980

1.63

motivate to buy that product

H2: Positive social media consumption will lead to increase consumer motivation.
Q17

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media presence


ensures good customer
support

50

2.32

1.377

.195

2.33

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media presence


ensures good customer

9.347

49

.000

1.820

1.43

2.21

support

H3: Experience with social media will be positively associate with brand engagement.
Q16
One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media interaction with


a specific brand will lead you 50

2.60

1.414

.200

to buy that brand

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media interaction with


a specific brand will lead you 10.500

49

.000

2.100

1.70

to buy that brand

H4: Experience with social media will be positively associated with consumer motivation.

2.50

Q19
One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Absence of social media


engagement, by a specific
brand, impacts your buying

50

3.28

1.341

.190

decision

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Absence of social media


engagement, by a specific
brand, impacts your buying

14.662

49

.000

2.780

2.40

decision

H5: There will be significant differences in brand engagement between Creators,


Conversationalists, Critics, Collectors, Joiners, Spectators and Inactive.
Q 20

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Kind of activities do you


involve in, while interacting
with an automobile brand, in
social media

50

3.72

1.949

.276

3.16

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Kind of activities do you


involve in, while interacting
with an automobile brand, in

11.684

49

.000

3.220

2.67

3.77

social media

H6: There will be significant differences in consumer motivation between Creators,


Conversationalists, Critics, Collectors, Joiners, Spectators and Inactive.

H7: Brand engagement will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
brand awareness.
Q24 & Q25

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

50

2.68

1.332

.188

50

2.58

1.341

.190

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence the brand
awareness

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

11.577

49

.000

2.180

1.80

2.56

10.964

49

.000

2.080

1.70

2.46

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence the brand
awareness

H8: Brand engagement will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
word of mouth.
Q24 & 26

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

50

2.68

1.332

.188

50

2.40

1.229

.174

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand impact
its word of mouth publicity

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

11.577

49

.000

2.180

1.80

2.56

10.933

49

.000

1.900

1.55

2.25

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand impact
its word of mouth publicity

H9: Brand engagement will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
purchase intention.
Q24 & 27

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

50

2.68

1.332

.188

50

2.60

1.309

.185

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence intention to
purchase that brand

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

11.577

49

.000

2.180

1.80

2.56

11.341

49

.000

2.100

1.73

2.47

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence intention to
purchase that brand

H10: Brand engagement will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
satisfaction with social media.
Q24 & 28

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Social media engagement


with a specific brand

50

2.68

1.332

.188

with a specific brand provide 50

2.70

1.344

.190

influence your social media


participation
Social media engagement
social media satisfaction

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Social media engagement


with a specific brand
influence your social media

11.577

49

.000

2.180

1.80

2.56

11.575

49

.000

2.200

1.82

2.58

participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand provide
social media satisfaction

H11: Consumer motivation will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
brand awareness.
Q29 & Q30

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

50

2.74

1.367

.193

50

2.80

1.443

.204

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
social media influences
brand awareness

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Motivation to participate in
social media influences social 11.583

49

.000

2.240

1.85

2.63

49

.000

2.300

1.89

2.71

media participation
Motivation to participate in
social media influences brand 11.272
awareness

H12: Consumer motivation will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
word of mouth.
Q29 & Q31

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

50

2.74

1.367

.193

social media influences word 50

2.68

1.220

.172

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
of mouth publicity

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Motivation to participate in
social media influences social 11.583

49

.000

2.240

1.85

2.63

49

.000

2.180

1.83

2.53

media participation
Motivation to participate in
social media influences word 12.640
of mouth publicity

H13: Consumer motivation will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
purchase intention.
Q29 & Q32

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

50

2.74

1.367

.193

50

2.68

1.362

.193

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
social media influence the
intention to purchase

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Motivation to participate in
social media influences social 11.583

49

.000

2.240

1.85

2.63

49

.000

2.180

1.79

2.57

media participation
Motivation to participate in
social media influence the

11.319

intention to purchase

H14: Consumer motivation will mediate the relationship between social media participation and
satisfaction with social media.
Q29 & Q33

One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

50

2.74

1.367

.193

50

2.52

1.328

.188

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
social media impact social
media satisfaction

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.5
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

Motivation to participate in
social media influences social 11.583

49

.000

2.240

1.85

2.63

49

.000

2.020

1.64

2.40

media participation
Motivation to participate in
social media impact social

10.752

media satisfaction

RELIABILITY TESTS
Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28

Case Processing Summary


N
Cases

Valid

50

100.0

Excludeda

.0

Total

50

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the


procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.771

N of Items
5

Item Statistics
Mean

Std. Deviation

Social media engagement


with a specific brand

2.68

1.332

50

2.58

1.341

50

2.40

1.229

50

2.60

1.309

50

with a specific brand provide 2.70

1.344

50

influence your social media


participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence the brand
awareness
Social media engagement
with a specific brand impact
its word of mouth publicity
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence intention to
purchase that brand
Social media engagement
social media satisfaction

Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted

Alpha if Item

Total Correlation

Deleted

Social media engagement


with a specific brand

10.28

13.471

.737

.657

10.38

13.996

.663

.685

10.56

16.782

.413

.770

10.36

13.460

.757

.651

with a specific brand provide 10.26

18.237

.209

.836

influence your social media


participation
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence the brand
awareness
Social media engagement
with a specific brand impact
its word of mouth publicity
Social media engagement
with a specific brand
influence intention to
purchase that brand
Social media engagement
social media satisfaction

Q29, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33

Case Processing Summary


N
Cases

Valid

50

100.0

Excludeda

.0

Total

50

100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the


procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
.666

N of Items
5

Item Statistics
Mean

Std. Deviation

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

2.74

1.367

50

2.80

1.443

50

social media influences word 2.68

1.220

50

2.68

1.362

50

2.52

1.328

50

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
social media influences
brand awareness
Motivation to participate in
of mouth publicity
Motivation to participate in
social media influence the
intention to purchase
Motivation to participate in
social media impact social
media satisfaction

Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted

Alpha if Item

Total Correlation

Deleted

Motivation to participate in
social media influences

10.68

13.161

.440

.605

10.62

12.526

.468

.591

social media influences word 10.74

15.543

.246

.684

10.74

13.462

.408

.620

10.90

12.541

.541

.558

social media participation


Motivation to participate in
social media influences
brand awareness
Motivation to participate in
of mouth publicity
Motivation to participate in
social media influence the
intention to purchase
Motivation to participate in
social media impact social
media satisfaction

The One-Sample T Test compares the mean score of a sample to a known value. Usually, the
known value is a population mean. H0: There is no significant relationship between the aspects

of medical facility. The null hypothesis (H0) is rejected because significance = 0.00 which is less
than . There is a significant relationship between the aspects of medical facility (H1).
Here the test value is considered as 0.5, the highest mean value obtained through one sample
statistics is 3.25 and the difference between the mean is 2.752 are I think visiting Emergency
Room to receive medical care would care would take less time than fixed clinic. The lowest
mean value obtained one sample statistics is 1.67 and the difference between mean is 1.170 are
When I am not feeling well, I usually go to. The 95% of confidence interval for the average
processing time is between which represents in the medical facility visit. Based on the result
generated by SPSS, the significant level is 0.000 and it is less than 0.05, so the null hypothesis is
rejected. There is significant relationship in the following aspects of the medical facility visit, for
this t-test with of 0.05.