Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2, MARCH/APRIL 1997
577
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. Surface roughness of a ball bearing race due to electrical fluting [2].
578
(a)
Fig. 2. Common mode equivalent model.
(b)
(c)
Fig. 3. Capacitance system models: (a) stator to rotor and rotor to frame
capacitance, (b) stator to frame capacitance, and (c) bearing capacitance.
BUSSE et al.: SYSTEM ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON BEARING CURRENTS
579
TABLE I
CAPACITANCE VALUES FOR 15 HP MACHINE OF [7]
Csf
Crf
Csr
Cb
deep, and
meters wide centered within a rectangular
conduit with all sides at the same potential. A dielectric
material separates the conductor and conduit by meters with
a relative permittivity of (slot paper). Equation (2) provides
the
for
slots [12]. Fig. 4 shows calculated values of
for induction machines from 5 to 1000 hp:
11 nF
1.1 nF
100 pF
200 pF
7.7 nF
1.0 nF
123 pF
225 pF
(2)
b) Calculation of
: The stator to rotor coupling capacitance, shown in Fig. 3, consists of
sets of parallel
conducting plates. The area of each plate equals the product of
the length of the rotor ( ) and the width of the rotor conductor
near the rotor surface ( ). This capacitance is given by (3);
where the distance between the parallel plates ( ) is the air gap
of the machine [12]. Fig. 4 shows calculated
for induction
machines from 5 to 1000 hp:
(3)
c) Calculation of
: The capacitive coupling between
the rotor and frame, shown in Fig. 3, is determined as the
capacitance of two concentric cylinders or a coaxial capacitor.
In this case, the effective gap between the cylinders must
compensate for the effect of the stator slot widths. If the
inside radius of the outer cylinder (stator) is
and the outer
radius of the inner cylinder (rotor)
, then the capacitance is
given by (4) [12]. Fig. 4 shows calculated
for induction
machines from 5 to 1000 hp:
(4)
decreases;
Fig. 4 shows with increasing machine size
the machine capacitances, however, increase with increasing
horsepower [8]. These calculations are based on design data for
four-pole, 460 Vac induction machines and associated bearing
dimensions.
B. Experimentally Determined System Capacitances
The machine zero sequence inductance and parasitic capacitances were measured on the induction machine of [7].
Measurement results and methodology for each element of the
system model follow. Table I lists measured and calculated
capacitance values for the machine of [7]. The measured
capacitance values were made with the rotor externally driven
at controlled speeds when appropriate.
1)
and : The common mode or zero sequence
impedance of the machine equals one third of the stator
resistance in series with one third of the stator leakage inductance. They were obtained by connecting the three stator lines
and measuring the impedance line-to-neutral with a HewlettPackard 4284A LCR meter. A value of 300 H and 59.8
was measured at 100 kHz.
2)
: For the 15-hp machine of [7], the
obtained
by LCR measurement with the rotor removed was 11.1 nF.
, and
are
By removing the rotor, the effects of
eliminated. The 11.1 nF compares well with the calculated
value 7.7 nF in Fig. 4, which is based on a different stack
length than the motor of [7].
3)
: Measurement of
was achieved by shorting
the rotor shaft to frame and connecting a LCR meter to the
three commonly connected stator terminals and the machine
580
frame. To obtain
, the value of
is subtracted from the
capacitance reading of the LCR meter. For the 15-hp machine
of [7], the measured value was 100 pF; Fig. 4 shows a value
of 123 pF. Fig. 4 suggests an increasing
with increasing
horsepower, which is consistent with the increasing machine
length and number of slots of higher power machines.
4)
: The bearing capacitance is a function of dielectric
characteristics, resistivity, and temperature of the lubricant,
geometrical construction, dynamics of the asperity contact
of the balls with the race, and speed of the rotor. The
, therefore, is dynamic and dependent on the operating
conditions of the machine. Tests were performed with a
segmented bearing and a pressure contact between the race,
film, a known insulator, and the ball. For the 15-hp machine
of [7], a
of 200 pF was measured. This compares favorably
with the calculated value of 225 pF of Fig. 4, predicted by the
bearing model.
5)
: An indirect measurement of
is possible
once
, and
are known. Measureing the impedance
from rotor to frame, the dominance of
can be reduced.
The value obtained with a LCR meter for the 15-hp induction
machine of [7] was 1.1 nF; Fig. 4 indicates 1.0 nF for a 15-hp
machine, which compares favorably with the measurement.
III. EFFECT OF DRIVE VARIABLES ON MOTOR
SHAFT VOLTAGE AND BEARING CURRENT
This section examines drive variablescommon mode
chokes, line reactors, long cablesand their effect on
and bearing current. These passive elements often provide
the impedance necessary for proper functioning of ac
drive systems. For example, common mode chokes reduce
conducted noise and series line reactors control voltage
reflection at a motors terminals. Therefore, the effects these
elements have on
and bearing currents are important to
quantify. To accomplish this, first a design equationthe
bearing voltage ratio (BVR)establishes a machine design
criterion for evaluating the potential for
and bearing
current. Next, the common mode circuit above is reduced in
complexity and a simple analysis tool is presented.
A. System Model and Analysis
With the common mode model for the drive established,
an analysis of the effects of system parameters on
and
bearing currents is possible. Fig. 2 allows for the investigation
of common mode chokes or transformers, line reactors, and
long cables through the modification of the series and parallel
impedance elements; it provides a model capable of examining
PWM modulation techniques and power device rise times;
and it allows for an investigation of source to ground voltage
levels.
1) Steady-State Shaft Voltage Level: With PWM frequencies much less than the natural frequency of the system zero
sequence network impedance, the capacitors divide
and
yield the following algebraic relationship for the BVR:
BVR
(6)
This relationship, although simple, provides substantial information about bearing charge and discharge phenomena
and potential improvements. For example, a value of
,
the bearing threshold voltage ( ), exists for each value
of film thickness below which dielectric breakdown EDM
does not occur. This threshold depends on pulse duration
and characteristics of the lubricant. However, (6) provides
an estimate of
. This estimate when compared to
determines the likelihood of EDM discharge. For example,
with a dielectric strength of 15
m and lubricant film
thickness varying between 0.2 and 2 m,
ranges from 330
. With a BVR of 0.1 (Fig. 5),
is in the neighborhood of
35
for a 460 Vac system having a
equal to one half
bus voltage or 350 Vdc. A
of this magnitude is sufficient
to cause EDM discharge.
Equation (6) also suggests that a large
reduces the
bearing voltage; thus, to maintain bearing or shaft voltage
below
(the maximum sustainable voltage without dielectric
breakdown EDM), increase the relative permittivity of the
lubricant. This expression also shows how the ESIM eliminates
the potential for bearing or shaft static voltage buildup: for
an ESIM, the
in (6) is zero. In addition, the capacitive
voltage divider indicates inserting an insulating sleeve or
barrier may exacerbate the bearing charging since this reduces
the effective .
Using (6) and combining it with results of the capacitance
curves of the previous section, the BVR as a function of
horsepower was derived with the results shown in Fig. 5. From
Fig. 5, the machine of [7] has a predicted BVR of 0.074.
, bearing current, and
Fig. 6 shows a typical sequence of
traces. It shows three different shaft voltage phenomena
occurring in the bearing. Region A depicts the shaft and
bearing charging according to the capacitor divider action of
(6) followed by an EDM discharge. Region B represents a
charging and discharging of the bearing without EDM current.
Finally, Region C shows the rotor and bearing charging, but
to a much lower voltage level before EDM discharge [8].
The BVR is obtained by dividing
by the
at a point
where the machines rotor rides the lubricant (Region A).
The experimental value (0.064) is in good agreement with
the theoretical calculation of 0.074.
2) A Second-Order Model Approximation: The common
mode model of Fig. 2 adequately describes most of the
observed phenomena associated with shaft voltages and
common mode currents. However, the complexity of this
BUSSE et al.: SYSTEM ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON BEARING CURRENTS
(7)
(8)
where
581
and
is the undamped natural frequency, is the dampis the characteristic impedance, and
is the
ing ratio,
. The equivalent capacitance, (
), equals
phase angle of
]
in parallel with the series
[
and the parallel combination of the
combination of the
and
.
This formulation of the system equations also allows for
an easy analysis of the rise time of the forcing function
, the effect of the PWM frequency, and influence of
the system parameters on damping, natural frequency, and
is longer than
overshoot. If the rise time of the stepped
one half of the oscillation period, the zero sequence current
current
is reduced substantially; thus reducing the
through the bearing and frame. Furthermore, increasing the
common mode inductancewith common mode chokes and
line reactorswithout considering the effect on the damping
factor can raise the of the circuit. The higher and lower
natural frequency may result in a near resonance condition
with the stepped waveform of the forcing functions PWM
carrier.
) and damped
Fig. 8 shows system time constant (
) as functions of common mode
natural frequency (
) for the 15-hp induction motor of [7]. Both
inductance (
quantities have been converted into hertz or 1/s, for easy comparison with typical carrier frequencies employed by IGBT
inverters. IGBT VSIs often incorporate common mode chokes
current. Fig. 8 indicates the damped
to reduce the
natural frequency and time constant decrease with increasing
common mode inductance. For typical common mode inductances, the damping in the system decreases and the damped
natural frequency is well within the dominant frequencies of
the common mode voltage source of IGBT inverters, setting
up a potential resonance condition.
3) A Third-Order ModelThe EDM Discharge Current: The
second-order system, very useful for voltage and common
mode analysis, fails to describe the EDM discharge phenomena. The full-order model of Fig. 2 is too complex. However,
the third-order system of Fig. 9 is manageable and accurately
582
BUSSE et al.: SYSTEM ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON BEARING CURRENTS
Fig. 12.
Long-cable-length response.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14. Series reactor response with a standard motor and an ESIM.
583
OF AN
ESIM
584
Doyle F. Busse, for a photograph and biography, see this issue, p. 576.
REFERENCES
[1] P. Alger and H. Samson, Shaft currents in electric machines, in AIRE
Conf., Philadelphia, PA, Feb. 1924.
[2] T. Tallian, G. Baile, H. Dalal, and O. Gustafsson, Rolling bearing
damageA morphological atlas, SKF Industries, Inc., Technology
Center, King of Prussia, PA.
[3] M. Costello, Shaft voltage and rotating machinery, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Applicat., Mar. 1993, pp. 419425.
[4] J. Lawson, Motor bearing fluting, CH3331-6/93/0000-0032, in 1993IEEE Pulp and Paper technical conference, pp. 3235, Hyannis, MA,
June, 1993.
[5] S. Chen, T. A. Lipo, and D. Fitzgerald, Measurement and analysis of
induction motor bearing currents in PWM inverter drives, in IEEE PES
Summer Meet., July 2427, 1995.
[6] S. Chen, T. A. Lipo, and D. Fitzgerald, Modeling of motor bearing
currents in PWM inverter drives, in IEEE IAS Ann. Conf. Rec., Oct.
812, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 388393.
[7] J. Erdman, R. J. Kerkman, D. Schlegel, and G. Skibinski, Effect of
PWM inverters on ac motor bearing currents and shaft voltages, in
APEC 95, Tenth Ann. Applied Power Elec. Conf. and Expo., Mar. 59,
1995, vol. 1, pp. 2433.
[8] D. Busse, J. Erdman, R. J. Kerkman, D. Schlegel, and G. Skibinski,
Bearing currents and their relationship to PWM drives, in IECON 95,
IEEE 21st Ann. Ind. Elec. Conf., Nov. 610, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 698705.
Jay M. Erdman, (M58) for a photograph and biography, see this issue, p.
576.
David W. Schlegel (S89), for a photograph and biography, see this issue,
p. 576.
Gary L. Skibinski (M96), for a photograph and biography, see this issue,
p. 576.