Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article information:
To cite this document:
Faudziah Hanim Fadzil, Hasnah Haron, Muhamad Jantan, (2005),"Internal auditing practices and internal control system", Managerial
Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 Iss: 8 pp. 844 - 866
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686900510619683
Downloaded on: 04-07-2012
References: This document contains references to 24 other documents
Citations: This document has been cited by 1 other documents
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
This document has been downloaded 8291 times since 2005. *
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by University of Calgary
For Authors:
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service.
Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in
business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as
well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is
a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/0268-6902.htm
MAJ
20,8
844
Muhamad Jantan
Centre for Policy Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Abstract
Purpose Two main objectives and they are: to determine whether the internal audit department of
the companies listed in the Bursa Malaysia complies with the Standards for the Professional Practice
of Internal Auditors IIA (2000); and, to determine whether compliance to SPPIA will affect the quality
of the internal control system of the company.
Design/methodology/approach Two sets of questionnaires were used in the study. Internal
auditing practices was measured by the items listed in the SPPIA and the internal control was
measured by means of the statement on internal control: guidance for directors of public listed
companies. The population used in this study was all the companies listed in the Bursa Malaysia in
2001. This study used both descriptive and inferential analyses.
Findings It was found that management of internal audit department, professional proficiency,
objectivity and review significantly influence the monitoring aspect of the internal control system.
Scope of work and performance of audit work significantly influences the information and
communication aspect of the internal control system while performance of audit work, professional
proficiency and objectivity significantly influence the control environment aspect of the internal
control system. The study also shows that management of internal audit department, performance of
audit work, audit program and audit reporting significantly influences the risk assessment aspect
of the internal control system. Lastly, performance of audit work and audit reporting significantly
influences the control activities aspect of the internal control system.
Research limitations/implications The research has contributed to the agency theory with
respect to the bonding costs that management has to pay to the internal auditors for the best interest of
the principals of the companies. Another important implication pertains to the extent of the internal
auditing practices among internal auditors in Malaysian public listed companies. Research has also
shown that the compliance with internal auditing practices partially influence certain aspects of the
quality of the internal control system.
Originality/value This is the first empirical study that has linked the compliance of the internal
auditing function to the SPPIA and its effect on the internal control system.
Keywords Auditing, Auditing standards, Malaysia
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Internal auditing has undergone dramatic changes that have expanded its scope in a way
that allows it to make greater contributions to the organization it serves. Internal auditing
is also performed in diverse legal and cultural environments; within organizations that
vary in purpose, size, and structure; and also by persons within or outside the
organization. Furthermore, the internal auditing profession also walks a tightrope
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
845
MAJ
20,8
846
to fulfil the above circumstances. The aim of this guidance is to assist listed companies in
making disclosures in their annual reports on the state of internal control, in compliance
with the Listing Requirements of the KLSE. Pursuant to the requirements of the Code in
relation to the Internal Audit Function, in May 2001, the Securities Commission
appointed the IIAM to establish a separate industry taskforce to formulate these
Guidelines to assist the board of public listed companies in effectively discharging their
responsibilities in relation to establishing an Internal Audit Function. Risk assessment,
control environment, control activities, information and communication and monitoring
are five important characteristics in this guideline.
The roles of internal auditors. In the revised statement of responsibilities of internal
auditing issued by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) (2000) as part of the
standards framework, the section on objectives states:
The objective of internal auditing is to assist all members of management in the effective
discharge of their responsibilities by furnishing them with analyses, appraisals,
recommendations and pertinent comments concerning the activities reviewed. The internal
auditor is concerned with any phase of business activity where he can be of service to
management. This involves going beyond accounting and financial records to obtain a full
understanding of the operations under review (p. 3).
Sawyer and Vinten (1996) noted four benefits managers have gained from internal
auditing assistance. These benefits were providing managers with the bases for
judgement and action, helping managers by reporting weaknesses in control and
performance and in recommending improvements, providing counsel to managers and
boards of directors on the solutions of business problems, and supplying information
that is timely, reliable and useful to all levels of management.
Additionally, the statement sets forth the types of services that should be performed
and the kinds of activities carried on by the internal audit function in attaining the
overall objective. Internal auditors should first review and appraise the soundness and
adequacy of the accounting, financial, and other operating controls, and promote
effective controls at reasonable cost. Secondly, the internal auditors should ascertain
the extent of compliance with established policies, plans, procedures, laws and
regulations, which could have a significant impact on the companys operations. Then
the internal auditors review the means of safeguarding assets and when appropriate,
verify the existence of such assets and appraise the economy and efficiency with which
resources are employed. Lastly, the internal auditors review operations or programs to
ascertain whether results are consistent with established objectives and goals and
whether the operations or programs are being carried out as planned.
Reviewing and evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of an organisations
internal control system and the quality of performance in carrying out assigned
responsibilities is representative of several primary core activities of internal audit
work. The purpose of the review of the adequacy of the internal auditing is to ascertain
whether the established system provides reasonable assurance that the organisations
objectives and goals will be met efficiently and economically.
Adequate control is considered to be present if administrative management has
planned and organised in a manner, which provides reasonable assurance that the
organisations objectives and goals will be achieved efficiently and economically.
Reasonable assurance is provided when cost-effective actions are taken to restrict
deviations, such as improper or illegal acts, to a tolerable level.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
847
MAJ
20,8
848
The role of internal auditing in the review of effectiveness of the system of internal
control is to ascertain whether the system is functioning as intended. Effective control
is present when the administrative management directs the system in such as way as
to provide reasonable assurance that the organisations objectives and goals will be
achieved. The purpose of the review for quality of performance is to ascertain whether
the organisations objectives and goals have been achieved.
The primary objectives of an organisations system of internal control are to provide
administrative management with reasonable assurance that financial information is
accurate and reliable; the organisation complies with policies, plans, procedures, laws,
regulations and contracts; assets are safeguarded against loss and theft; resources are
used economically and efficiently; and established objectives and goals for operations
or programs can be met. Internal auditing focuses on an evaluation of this system or
framework of internal control.
A second type of audit work that internal auditors are guided to perform is
reviewing the accuracy and reliability of financial and operating information and the
means used to identify, measure, classify and report such information. Information
systems provide data for decision-making, control, and compliance with external
requirement. Therefore, internal auditors should examine information systems and
determine whether financial and operating records and reports contain accurate,
reliable, timely, complete and useful information, and controls over record keeping and
reporting are adequate and effective.
The performance of reviews of the systems established to ensure compliance with
policies, plans, procedures, laws, regulations and contracts represents a third element
of audit activity described by the standards. Administrative management is
responsible for establishing the systems designed to ensure compliance with such
requirements as laws, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. The internal auditors
role is to determine whether the systems designed by management are adequate and
effective and whether the activities audited are complying with the appropriate
requirements.
Further, as described by the standards, the internal auditors role includes providing
appraisals with recommendations regarding administration management established
objectives and goals for operations and programs.
Research framework and methodology
The main source of data is annual reports of Malaysian public listed companies. Data
collected from the firms report were used to examine the existence of internal audit in
the firms and if any, the functions of the internal auditors. Corporate annual reports
were used because it is seen to be the main form of company communication (Zeghal
and Ahmed, 1990; Unerman, 2000) and also they were widely available (Buhr, 1998;
Gray et al., 1995; Unerman, 2000).
Research framework
This study focuses on two variables: internal auditing practices and quality of the
internal control system. The theoretical framework is as follows:
Figure 1 model proposed is based on the postulate in the agency theory where the
principal will incur the agency cost in order for them to observe the agents action.
The relationship between principals and agents is that the principals will incur
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
849
Figure 1.
Theoretical framework
monitoring expenditures while the agents incur bonding costs to ensure that the work
of looking after the wealth of the principals is done (Adams, 1994). The cost of internal
audit is an example of this bonding costs. Sherer and Kent (1983) perceived internal
auditing to be a bonding cost borne by the senior manager to satisfy the demands for
accountability made by external participants especially shareholders. Not internal
audit professionals argue that an effective audit function will correlate with an
organisations success in meeting management objectives and whether the internal
control system is functioning as intended.
Research hypotheses
The research hypotheses will examine the compliance of the internal auditing practices
to the quality of the internal control system. There are 45 sub-hypotheses relating the
internal auditing practices to internal control system.
H1.
H1a. relates monitoring of the internal control quality with the nine components of the
internal auditing practices.
H1a1. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the monitoring of the quality of the internal
control system.
H1a2. The greater the scope of work of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1a3. The higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
MAJ
20,8
H1a4. The higher professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices, the
higher the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1a5. The higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
850
H1a6. The higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1a7. The better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1a8. The better the audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1a9. The better the audit reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
H1b. relates information and communication of the internal control quality with the
nine components of the internal auditing practices.
H1b1. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the better the information and communication of the
quality of the internal control system.
H1b2. The greater the scope of work of the internal auditing practices, the better
the information and communication of the quality of the internal control
system.
H1b3. The better the performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices,
the better the information and communication of the quality of the internal
control system.
H1b4. The higher the professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices,
the better the information and communication of the quality of the internal
control system.
H1b5. The higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the better
the information and communication of the quality of the internal control
system.
H1b6. The higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the better the
information and communication of the quality of the internal control
system.
H1b7. The better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the better the
information and communication of the quality of the internal control
system.
H1b8. The better the audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the better the
information and communication of the quality of the internal control system.
H1b9. The better the audit reporting of the internal auditing practices, the better the
information and communication of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c. relates control environment of the internal control quality with the nine
components of the internal auditing practices.
H1c1. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the control environment of the quality of the
internal control system.
H1c2. The greater the scope of work of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c3. The higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the control environment of the quality of the internal control
system.
H1c4. The higher the professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices, the
higher the control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c5. The higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c6. The higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c7. The better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c8. The better the audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1c9. The better the audit reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control environment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1d. relates risk assessment of the internal control quality with the nine components of
the internal auditing practices.
H1d1. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the risk assessment of the quality of the
internal control system.
H1d2. The greater the scope of work of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1d3. The higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1d4. The higher the professional proficiency of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the risk assessment of the quality of the internal
control system.
H1d5. The higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1d6. The higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
851
MAJ
20,8
H1d7. The better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1d8. The better the audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
852
H1d9. The better the audit reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the risk assessment of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e relates control activities of the internal control quality with the nine components of
the internal auditing practices.
H1e1. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the control activities of the quality of the
internal control system.
H1e2. The greater the scope of work of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e3. The higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the control activities of the quality of the internal
control system.
H1e4. The higher the professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e5. The higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e6. The higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e7. The better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e8. The better the audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
H1e9. The better the audit reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher
the control activities of the quality of the internal control system.
Internal auditing practices and the quality of internal control system
Independence and objectivity is seen as an important attribute to the quality of internal
audit function (IIA, 2000; Bethea, 1992; Traver, 1991; Farbo, 1985; Clark et al., 1980;
Glazer and Jaenicke, 1980). If internal auditors are not independent and objective, they
are of little value to those who demand their service (Clark et al., 1980; Elliot and
Willingham, 1980; Ward and Robertson, 1980; Williams, 1978). The internal audit
department must be granted the license to carry out its responsibilities freely and
objectively and also their judgements reached must be unbiased.
Most internal audit professionals argue that an effective internal audit function
unequivocally correlates with an organisations success in meeting management
objectives and whether the internal control system is functioning as intended.
Research design
The basic research design utilised for this study was a survey design. The collection of
primary data was accomplished through the use of a mail survey instrument
(questionnaire). Data collected from the questionnaire is divided into two components:
(1) the measurement of the internal auditing practices was sent to the CAE/Head of
Internal Auditing Department; and
(2) questionnaire on the measurement of the quality of internal control system was
sent to the audit committee.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
853
812
158
654
250
38.23 (per cent)
Table I.
Summary of response
rates
MAJ
20,8
Demographic
Characteristics
Frequency Percent
Current position
854
Table II.
Summary of
demographic data on
respondents from internal
auditors
Table III.
Summary of
demographic data on
respondents from audit
committees
Demographic
Characteristics
Current position
Manager
Director
Audit committee
Senior
Others
First degree
Post graduate
Diploma
Certificate
Others
Qualification
178
17
55
106
88
22
5
29
71.2
6.8
22.0
42.4
35.2
8.8
2.0
11.6
174
76
49
45
40
37
30
20
12
5
4
3
3
2
166
84
231
19
144
54
42
10
69.6
30.4
19.6
18.0
16.0
14.8
12.0
8.0
4.8
2.0
1.6
1.2
1.2
0.8
66.4
33.6
92.4
7.6
57.6
21.6
16.8
4.0
Frequency
Per cent
88
59
57
6
40
82
34
6
4
124
35.2
23.6
22.8
2.4
16.0
32.8
13.6
2.4
1.6
49.6
item of internal auditing practices from the perspective of the internal auditors with a
mean of 4.46 while the least rated items is professional proficiency with a mean of 3.88.
The analysis of the results also reveals that, of the 50 internal auditing practices
items, there are 35 items having a score between 4.00 and 5.00 and 15 items between
3.00 and 4.00. Items having scores ranging from 4.00 to 5.00 are strongly compliant
with IIA (2000, 2001).
The extent of existence of the quality of the internal control system. Table V shows
the means of the components of the internal control system. From the results, the risk
assessment component of internal control system is a highly rated item with a mean
of 4.29 while information and communication is the least rated item with a mean
of 4.12.
An analysis of the results also reveal that, of the 25 items stated, there are 23 items
having a score between 4.00 and 5.00. This suggests that the respondents consider
the 23 items identified earlier exist in their internal control systems. This is because
items having scores between 4.00 and 5.00 are perceived to be very important in this
study.
Hypotheses testing. Several methods of analyses were utilised to test these alternative
hypotheses. The analyses used to test the hypotheses include descriptive and statistical
analysis. The hypotheses sought to test for a significance difference of nine variables of
internal auditing practices and five variables of internal control system.
Hypotheses.
H1a. The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the greater the scope of work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the better the audit reviews of the
internal auditing practices, the better the audit programs of the internal
auditing practices, the better the audit reporting of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the monitoring of the quality of the internal control system.
Rank
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Independence
Scope of audit work
Audit reporting
Audit programs
Management of IAD
Performance of audit work
Audit reviews
Objectivity
Professional proficiency
Rank
Item
1
2
3
4
5
Risk assessment
Control activities
Monitoring
Control environment
Information and communication
Mean
Standard deviation
4.46
4.22
4.17
4.12
4.12
4.11
4.11
4.04
3.88
0.59
0.49
0.54
0.57
0.53
0.62
0.68
0.60
0.57
Mean
Standard deviation
4.29
4.28
4.15
4.14
4.12
0.51
0.45
0.61
0.59
0.46
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
855
Table IV.
Means scores of the
extent of the internal
auditing practices from
the internal auditors
perspectives
Table V.
Mean scores of the extent
of existence of the
internal control systems
MAJ
20,8
856
Table VI shows, the model is significant F 2:502 (sig. F 0:009: However, the
model only explained 8.6 per cent of the variation in monitoring. Internal auditing
practices of significant influence in their order of impact are management of internal
audit department beta 0:327; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:013; professional proficiency
beta 20:197; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:024; objectivity beta 20:146; p # 0:01 and
audit reviews Beta 20:174; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:038:
The following Table VI summarises the results.
Thus, there is evidence to support that management of internal audit department of
the internal auditing practices positively influences the monitoring aspect of internal
control system while professional proficiency, objectivity and audit reviews of the
internal auditing practices negatively influence the monitoring aspect of internal
control system. Therefore, only H1a1 is accepted while H1a2 to H1a9 are rejected.
H1b.
The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the greater the scope of work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the performance of audit work of the internal
auditing practices, the higher professional proficiency of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the independence of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the
better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the better the
audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the better the audit
reporting of the internal auditing practices, the better the information and
communication of the quality of the internal control system.
Table VI.
Results of H1a
Beta
Sig.
Constant
Management of IAD
Scope of audit work
Performance of audit work
Professional proficiency
Independence
Objectivity
Audit reviews
Audit programs
Audit reporting
0.327
2 0.084
0.126
2 0.197
2 0.009
2 0.146
2 0.174
2 0.020
0.131
10.672
2.515
20.866
1.433
22.264
20.122
21.765
22.092
20.223
1.453
0.000
0.013 * *
0.388
0.153
0.024 * *
0.903
0.079 *
0.038 * *
0.824
0.148
Notes: Dependent variable: monitoring; *at 0.01 significant level; * *at 0.05 significant level; R 2: 0.086;
F: 2.502
Beta
Sig.
Constant
Management of IAD
Scope of audit work
Performance of audit work
Professional proficiency
Independence
Objectivity
Audit reviews
Audit programs
Audit reporting
0.058
2 0.212
0.207
2 0.065
0.020
0.015
2 0.118
2 0.026
2 0.023
16.009
0.437
22.175
2.321
20.738
0.251
0.184
21.399
20.296
20.251
0.000
0.662
0.031 * *
0.021 * *
0.461
0.802
0.854
0.163
0.768
0.802
Notes: Dependent variable: information and communication; * * at 0.05 significant level; R 2: 0.062; F:1.752
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
857
Table VII.
Results of H1b
The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the greater the scope of work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the performance of audit work of the internal
auditing practices, the higher professional proficiency of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the independence of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the
better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the better the
audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the better the audit
reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher the control
environment of the quality of the internal control system.
Beta
Sig.
Constant
Management of IAD
Scope of audit work
Performance of audit work
Professional proficiency
Independence
Objectivity
Audit reviews
Audit programs
Audit reporting
0.169
0.015
0.315
2 0.266
0.086
2 0.249
0.058
0.040
2 0.110
11.820
1.336
0.162
3.671
23.087
1.117
23.093
0.699
0.469
21.257
0.000
0.183
0.871
0.000 * *
0.002 * *
0.265
0.002 * *
0.485
0.640
0.210
Notes: Dependent variable: control environment; * * at 0.05 significant level; R 2: 0.118; F: 3.470
Table VIII.
Result of H1c
MAJ
20,8
858
impact are performance of audit work beta 0:315; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:000;
professional proficiency beta 20:266; p # 0:05 (sig.F 0:002 and objectivity
beta 20:249; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:002:
Therefore, the results show that performance of audit work positively influences the
control environment aspect of internal control system while professional proficiency
and objectivity of the internal auditing practices negatively influence the control
environment aspect of internal control system and therefore the null hypothesis is
accepted. Therefore, H1c3 is accepted while H1c1 to H1c2 and H1c4 to H1c9 are
rejected.
H1d.
The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the greater the scope of work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the performance of audit work of the internal
auditing practices, the higher professional proficiency of the internal
auditing practices, the higher the independence of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the
better the audit reviews of the internal auditing practices, the better the
audit programs of the internal auditing practices, the better the audit
reporting of the internal auditing practices, the higher the risk assessment
of the quality of the internal control system.
Table IX.
Result of H1d
Beta
Sig.
Constant
Management of IAD
Scope of audit work
Performance of audit work
Professional proficiency
Independence
Objectivity
Audit reviews
Audit programs
Audit reports
2 0.254
2 0.157
0.193
2 0.121
0.071
0.045
0.015
0.211
0.238
11.395
21.975
21.640
2.218
21.411
0.932
0.554
0.184
2.438
2.655
0.000
0.049 * *
0.102
0.027 * *
0.160
0.352
0.580
0.855
0.016 * *
0.008 * *
Notes: Dependent variable: risk assessment; * * at 0.05 significant level; R 2: 0.101; F: 2.983
practices positively influence the risk assessment aspect of internal control system.
H1d3, H1d8 and H1d9 are accepted while the rest are rejected.
H1e.
The better the management of the internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices, the greater the scope of work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the performance of audit work of the internal auditing
practices, the higher professional proficiency of the internal auditing practices,
the higher the independence of the internal auditing practices, the higher the
objectivity of the internal auditing practices, the better the audit reviews of the
internal auditing practices, the better the audit programs of the internal
auditing practices, the better the audit reporting of the internal auditing
practices, the higher the control activities of the quality of the internal control
system.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
859
Table X suggested that the model is significant F 1:734 (sig. F 0:082; p # 0:01:
However, the model only explained 6.1 per cent of the variation in control activities.
Internal auditing practices of significant influence in their order of impact are
performance of audit work beta 0:176; p # 0:05 (sig. F 0:049 and audit
reporting beta 0:175; p # 0:01 (sig. F 0:057:
The results support the hypothesis that both performance of audit work and audit
reporting of the internal audit practices positively influence the control activities aspect
of quality of the internal control system. Therefore, H1e3 and H1e9, which positively
influence the control activities of the quality of the internal control systems are
accepted while the rest of the hypotheses are rejected.
Summary of results. The management of internal audit department of internal
auditing practices positively influences the monitoring aspect of the quality of the
internal control system but it is negatively influenced by the professional proficiency,
objectivity and audit review of the internal auditing practices.
Information and communication aspect of the quality of the internal control system is
negatively influenced by scope of work of the internal auditing practices but is positively
influenced by performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices.
Beta
Sig.
Constant
Management of IAD
Scope of audit work
Performance of audit work
Professional proficiency
Independence
Objectivity
Audit reviews
Audit programs
Audit reporting
2 0.098
2 0.136
0.176
2 0.049
0.123
2 0.063
0.043
2 0.078
0.175
14.046
20.748
21.399
1.979
20.560
1.576
20.751
0.507
20.876
1.915
0.000
0.455
0.163
0.049 * *
0.576
0.116
0.453
0.613
0.382
0.057 *
Notes: Dependent variable: control activities; *at 0.01 significant level; * *at 0.05 significant level;
R 2: 0.061; F: 1.734
Table X.
Result of H1e
MAJ
20,8
860
The control environment aspect of the quality internal control system is positively
influenced by performance of audit work of the internal auditing practices while it is
negatively influenced by professional proficiency and objectivity of the internal
auditing practices.
The risk assessment aspect of the quality of the internal control system is
negatively influenced by management of internal audit department of the internal
auditing practices but is positively influenced by performance of audit work, audit
program and audit reporting of the internal auditing practices.
The control activities aspect of the quality of the internal control system is
positively influenced by performance of audit work and audit reporting of the internal
auditing practices.
Discussion and conclusion
This study examined the extent of the internal auditing practices by the internal audit
department and the effects of the practices have on the quality of the internal control
system. Analyses were done from the Internal Audit Practice Scale and Internal Control
System Scale that were sent to all internal auditors and audit committees of the
Malaysian Public Listed Companies for the year 2001.
The extent of the internal auditing practices
One of the major findings in this study is the extent of internal auditing practices in
Malaysian Public Listed Companies. The five variables were derived from the IIA
(2000), which were: independence and objectivity, professional proficiency, scope of
work, performance of audit work and management of the internal auditing department.
However, this study suggest that the internal auditing practices should comprise of
nine functions instead of only five functions as suggested by the IIA (2000). The
functions suggested are as follows: management of internal audit department,
performance of audit work, independence, audit reviews, audit reporting, scope of audit
work, professional proficiency, objectivity and audit programs. The four new functions
are objectivity (separated from independence), audit reviews, audit programs and audit
reporting.
Comparison was also made between the variables of this study and IIA (2001).
Under IIA (2001), the standards consists of ten variables: purpose, authority, and
responsibility; independence and objectivity; proficiency and due professional care;
quality assurance and improvement program; managing the internal audit activity;
nature of audit work; engagement planning; performing the engagement;
communicating results; monitoring progress; and managements acceptance of risks.
The difference between this studys variables and IIA (2001) is the additional of five
new audit functions that is the monitoring progress; communicating results;
engagement planning; purpose, authority and responsibility; and managements
acceptance of risks.
Comparison with the findings of this study and the IIA (2001) were also made.
There are only two new functions of the internal auditing practices in the IIA (2001):
purpose, authority and responsibility, and managements acceptance of risks. The
rests of the internal auditing practices functions in this study are consistent to the IIA
(2000, 2001). Table XI shows the summary of comparisons of the extent of the internal
auditing practices.
SPPIA (2000)
PPF (2002)
Independence
Objectivity
Scope of work
Performance of audit work
Management of internal audit
department
Professional proficiency
Scope of work
Performance of audit work
Communicating results
Engagement planning
Purpose, authority and
responsibility
Managements acceptance of
risks
Internal auditing practices and the quality of the internal control system
This study also examines the influence of internal auditing practices and the quality of
internal control system. It is shown that only the monitoring aspect of the quality
of internal control system positively influenced by the management of the internal audit
department. However, it is negatively influenced by the professional proficiency,
objectivity and audit review of the internal auditing practices. By managing the
department, the work performed by the internal audit department has been implemented
in the past and the work schedules have taken into consideration the goal of the internal
audit department and also the general purposes of company management. Therefore
this will positively influence the monitoring of the internal control system since this will
have an effective impact on the monitoring process and also reports on illegal acts are
properly monitored. However, this study suggests that professional proficiency such as
adequate knowledge, professional membership, certification, and training in electronic
data processing (EDP) system lead to lower monitoring of the quality of the internal
control system. This is because when the internal auditors have all the above-mentioned
criteria, it would imply that they are competent to do the work and therefore lower
monitoring of the quality of the internal control system is needed since the internal
auditors have a clear understanding of the internal control system. This is also true for
objectivity and audit reviews of the internal auditing practices on the monitoring of the
quality of the internal control system. Objectivity involves the unbiased attitude and
avoidance of conflict of interest by the internal auditors while audit reviews are
efficiently conducted in respect to the necessary audit operations. Therefore, internal
auditors need lower monitoring of the quality of the internal control system since the
entire necessary audit operations has been well conducted.
This study also suggests that scope of work of the internal auditing practices
negatively influences the information and communication aspect of the quality of the
internal control system while the performance of audit work of the internal auditing
practices positively influences the information and communication aspect of the
quality of the internal control system. Scope of work of the internal auditing practices
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
861
Table XI.
Summary of comparisons
of the extent of the
internal auditing
practices
MAJ
20,8
862
involves reviewing the system to ensure compliance with procedures, policies, laws
and regulation and planning of the work and there is also better coordination between
external and internal auditors. This means that if there is better scope of work of
the internal auditing practices, this will lead to lesser control procedures of computer
information system and lesser assessment of information needed on the quality of
the internal control system. The internal auditors follow all the necessary procedures in
doing the audit work and therefore lesser information and communication of the
quality of the internal control system is needed. However, the better the performance of
audit work, the greater is the information and communication since in performing the
audit work, the internal auditors need to identify, analyse, evaluate and record
sufficient information to achieve the engagement objectives.
This study also perceived that the performance of audit work of the internal
auditing practices positively influences the control environment aspect of the quality of
the internal control system while professional proficiency and objectivity of the
internal auditing practices negatively influences the control environment aspect of the
quality of the internal control system. Performance of audit work plays a great impact
on the control environment of the quality of the internal control system. Therefore, the
better the performance of the audit work, the greater is the control environment on the
quality of the internal control system. In performing the audit work, the internal
auditors have been trained and are competent to do the audit work. Consequently, they
are able to identify and analyse the necessary records to achieve the audit objective.
This will have a positive impact on the control environment of the quality of the
internal control systems since the senior management will demonstrate a higher
climate of trust with better performance of the audit work.
This study also suggests that management of internal audit department of the
internal auditing practices negatively influences the risk assessment aspect of the
quality of the internal control system. However, the performance of audit work, audit
program and audit reporting of the internal auditing practices positively influences the
risk assessment aspect of the quality of the internal control system. Since the work
performed by the internal audit department has been implemented in the past and the
work schedules take into consideration the goals of internal audit department,
therefore, this will lead to lower risk assessment of the quality of the internal control
system. This is because; the necessary proper procedures are already applied in
managing the internal audit department. However, the better the performance of audit
work, audit program and audit reporting of the internal auditing practices lead to
better risk assessment. In performing the audit work, the internal auditors will identify
better risk management framework and risk management policy and also better
procedures should be installed in monitoring the applications of policies and
procedures of the organisation. This is also true for audit programs and audit
reporting. The better the audit program and audit reporting, the installation of the
procedures and application of policies in assessing the risk of the organisation will
further improve.
Performance of audit work and audit reporting of the internal auditing practices
positively influence the control activities aspect of the quality of the internal control
system. With trained and competent internal audit staff and better evaluation to
achieve the engagement objectives, this will lead to better control activities of the
quality of the internal control system. In this case, higher board of directors approval
on the audit work performed is achieved and the internal auditors would diligently
investigate the variances. There are also improved recommendations made by
the internal audit department through audit reporting.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
863
Theoretical implications
The first theoretical implication is that this study has contributed to the agency theory
and internal audit paradigm where this study supported how the agency theory
provide more meaningful research in the internal audit discipline based on the premise
monitoring expenditure incurred by the principal and the agent. This study also
explains the existence of agency theory postulated and its influence on the extent of
internal auditing practices in Malaysian public listed companies and its effect on the
firms internal control system.
Practical implications
An important finding of this research pertains to the extent of the internal auditing
practices among internal auditors in Malaysian public listed companies. The first
practical implications refer to changing of internal auditing practices functions from
five to nine. The standard setter such as the IIA has the important role to revise the
PPF or the SPPIA based on this study. The IIA (2000) basically described the criteria
by which the operations of an internal auditing department are evaluated and
measured and they are intended to represent the practice of internal auditing, as it
should be. This includes independence and objectivity, professional proficiency, scope
of work, performance of audit work and management of internal audit department.
The study implied that the IIA should include nine factors in building up the SPPIA,
that is independence, scope of work, audit reporting, audit programs, management of
internal audit department, performance of audit work, audit reviews, objectivity and
professional proficiency since these factors revealed that CAEs placed much
importance on above factors. The assistance of internal auditing practices benefit
managers in providing bases for judgement and action, helping managers by reporting
weaknesses in control and performance, providing counsel to managers and board of
directors on the solutions of business problems and supplying information that is
timely, reliable and useful to all levels of management. Therefore, compliance to the
SPPIA is very important to internal auditors in the extent of the internal auditing
practices and IIA must play its role in representing the practice of internal auditing, as
it should be. Another implication is that all the variables in this study is consistent
with the IIA (2001).
The rationale behind the extent of the internal audit practices is that it provides
opportunity for the Chief Audit Executives or internal auditors to get the
managements undivided attention to the extent of internal auditing practices on the
quality of the internal control system. Reporting significant audit results and
recommendations give Chief Audit Executives an avenue for presenting their internal
MAJ
20,8
864
audit practices to the president and other top management team members. The
reasonable and meaningful findings and recommendations contained in the audit
report are symbols of their contribution, which result in improvements to the
organisation as a whole.
Further, Chief Audit Executives might have perceived more importance to the
ability to provide independent reviews to the president or other top management team
members. Again, in order to comply with the SPPIA, Chief Audit Executives believe
that their departments should be independent, have bigger scope of audit work, better
management of internal audit department, higher performance of audit work, better
application of auditing standards to audit work, professional and proficient in internal
audit practices.
The results show that the five functions of the quality of the internal control system
are as per Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) standard. Currently,
Malaysian approved auditing standards have incorporated this and also adopted
the statement on internal control: guidance for directors of public listed companies
(MIA, 2001). Internal auditing department also should be seen to conduct their work
effectively and have trained staff.
Limitations of the study
This study provides empirical evidence that the internal auditing practices of the
public listed companies in Malaysia comply with the IIA (2000) and statistically
influence the quality of the internal control systems. This may be due to the auditing
standards enforced by the IIA (Malaysia) and MIA.
This study, however, has its limitations. Of 250 public listed companies included in
this study, it is only representative of 38.23 per cent of public listed companies for the
year 2001. Consequently, the results may not be generalisable to the population of
internal auditors as a whole. Furthermore, the extent of the internal auditing practices
is only limited to the IIA (2000).
Internal auditors typically work as a team in its normal internal audit practices.
This study is limited as only individuals who are Chief Audit Executives were
examined. The dynamics of group interaction were not considered. However, the
Chief Audit Executives represent the internal audit department suggesting that
the study of this individual is the logical first step.
This study assumed that auditors are of the same calibre across firms for each
designation. However, this may not be a valid assumption since years of experience of
the internal auditors are not included in the study.
Conclusion
While the results in this study are by no means conclusive, it is hope that this study has
contributed to the research done in the extent of the internal auditing practices.
This study has also provided some evidence on the extent of the internal auditing
practices and the influence it has on the internal control system.
Notes
1. Please refer to www.theiia.org/iia for detail explanation of IIA (2001).
2. MICPA Malaysian Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
References
Adams, M.B. (1994), Agency Theory and the international audit, Managerial Auditing Journal,
Vol. 9 No. 8 pp. 8-12.
Barrett, M.J. (1986), Measuring internal auditing performance, Internal Auditing, Vol. 2,
pp. 30-5.
Bethea, P. Jr. (1992), A Descriptive Exploratory Examination of the Role and Responsibilities of
Internal Auditors, UMI Microform, Ann Arbor, MI.
Buhr, N. (1998), Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case
of acid rain and Falconbridge, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11
No. 2, pp. 163-90.
Chambers, A.D., Selim, G.M. and Vinten, G. (1987), International Auditing, ELBS.
Clark, M., Gibbs, T.E. and Schroeder, R.B. (1980), Evaluating internal audit departments under
SAS No. 9, The Women CPA, 8-11 and 22.
Elliot, R.K. and Willingham, J.J. (1980), Management Fraud: Detection and Prevention, Petrocelli
Books, Inc., New York, NY.
Farbo, J.L. (1985), A Comparison of the Perceived Effectiveness of the Internal Audit Function
Between Selected Private and Public Institutions in the Western United States, UMI
Microform, Ann Arbor, MI.
Financial Times (2002) Malaysian Mobile Operator Reports MYR260 Million Fraud,
13 September, available at: www.thecorporatelibrary.com/Governance-Research/news/
2002/09_11_02.html (accessed 25 January 2005).
Glazer, A.S. and Jaenicke, H.R. (1980), A Framework for Evaluating an Internal Audit
Function, The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte
Springs, FL.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995), Corporate social environmental reporting. a review of
the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 47-77.
Institute of Internal Auditors (2000), The Standards for the Professional Practice of
Internal Auditing, The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte
Springs, FL.
Institute of Internal Auditors (2001), The Professional Pratices Framework, The Institute of
Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL.
Malaysian Institute of Accountants (2001), Statement on Internal Control: Guidance For
Directors of Public Listed Companies, KLSE, Kuala Lumpur.
Sawyer, L.B. and Vinten, G. (1996), The Manager and the Internal Auditor, Wiley, New York, NY.
Sherer, M. and Kent, D. (1983), Auditing and Accountability, Pitman, London.
Traver, R.O. (1991), A Comparison of Perceived Importance of Factors that have an Impact on
Audit Effectiveness, UMI Microform, Ann Arbor, MI.
Unerman, J. (2000), Reflection of quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis,
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 667-81.
Vinten, G. (2003), Enronitus dispelling the disease, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 No. 9,
pp. 448-55.
Ward, D.D. and Robertson, J.C. (1980), Reliance on internal auditors, Journal of Accountancy,
Vol. 150, pp. 62-73.
Williams, H.M. (1978), The emerging responsibility of the internal auditor, The Internal
Auditor, Vol. 18, pp. 45-52.
Internal auditing
practices and
control system
865
MAJ
20,8
Zeghal, D. and Ahmed, S.A. (1990), Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure
media used by Canadian firms, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 3
No. 1, pp. 38-53.
866
Further reading
Hair, J.E., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (2002), Multivariate Data Analysis,
6th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Sawyer, L.B. and Dittenhofer, M.A. (1981), The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing,
The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL.