Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 07-5151
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-cr-00227-D-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
November 6, 2008
William Woodward Webb, THE EDMISTEN & WEBB LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
George E. B. Holding, United States
Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, William M. Gilmore, Assistant United
States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
After a jury trial, Delton Riggins was convicted of
conspiring
to
knowingly
make
false
statements
to
licensed
Finding no
error, we affirm.
A
substantial
jurys
verdict
evidence,
taking
must
be
the
view
sustained
most
if
there
favorable
to
is
the
(4th
Cir.
1996)
(en
banc)).
This
court
must
consider
the evidence, this court does not review the credibility of the
witnesses and assumes that the jury resolved all contradictions in
the testimony in favor of the government.
510 F.3d 433, 440 (4th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1917
(2008).
This
390,
394
(4th
Cir.
2006)
(internal
quotation
marks
and
citation omitted).
To prove that Riggins violated 371, the government
must prove an agreement between two or more persons to act together
in committing an offense and an overt act in furtherance of the
conspiracy. United States v. Chorman, 910 F.2d 102, 109 (4th Cir.
1990).
To
sustain
the
aiding
and
abetting
conviction,
the
This
Id.
(internal
To prove a violation of
(1)
See