Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiff,
v.
Brett Kimberlin, et al.,
Defendants.
IN THE
What is unknown to both Mr. Hoge and this Court is Brett Kimberlins
correct address. While we have a last known address for him, we do not know
where he currently may be found, and it is not improper to use a third-party
subpoena to seek to determine a correct mailing address for an adverse party.
Moreover, Defendant Kimberlin has been particularly uncooperative in
fulfilling his obligation to inform the Court of his correct address. First, he refused
to cooperate with the Deputy Sheriff attempting to serve the summons at his last
known address. [G]ood luck finding me. Affidavit, Docket Item 19, at 2. Second,
he has not provided an address, phone number, or email address with the signature
block (as required by Rule 1-311) on any paper he has filed with this Court in the
instant lawsuitincluding his Response opposing Mr. Hoges Motion to Compel.
The applicable case law notes that the signers address, telephone number, etc., are
integral and indispensable parts of any court paper. Smith-Myers Corporation v.
Sherrill, 209 Md.App. 494, 60 A.3d 90, 102 (2013). Defendant Kimberlin has not
cited any facts or law that entitles him to an exception.
Defendant Kimberlin also makes the specious argument that because he was
fortuitously found attending a hearing in another matter in another county and was
personally served with process and that since he has filed an answer[ ] and filed
dispositive motions, Mr. Hoge is nuttier than a fruitcake for seeking to find
Defendants address via a subpoena. In essence, the Defendant argues that because
it might be possible for him to be found again for personal service that this Court
should not be kept informed of his current address and that nothing should done to
determine it. His argument is nonsensical.
Because Defendant Kimberlin has offered no facts or law in support of
quashing the subpoena to GoDaddy LLC, his motion to quash should be denied.
DEFENDANT KIMBERLIN LACKS STANDING TO REPRESENT ALMIGHTY MEDIA OR
BREITBART UNMASKED
Almighty Media and Breitbart Unmasked are business entities and not
natural persons. They must be represented by an attorney. Rule 2-131(a). Brett
Kimberlin is not an attorney. He may not represent other Defendants before this
Court. Therefore, unless he is admitting that he is the sole proprietor of the two
business entities and that by suing them Mr. Hoge is actually suing him, he may
not represent them before this Court.
Defendant Kimberlin denies any association with Almighty Media stating
that he had never heard of that entity before the instant lawsuit was filed.
Response, 5. He also falsely states that the Complaint alleges that he is
somehow associated with it in some type of supervisory capacity. Id. The only
individual identified in the Complaint as having any such connection to Almighty
Media is John Doe 4. However, even if Defendant Kimberlin were to admit that he
is John Doe 4, he still would not be able represent that entity because he isnt
licensed to practice law.
If Almighty Media and/or Breitbart Unmasked wish to be represented, they
should retain the services of counsel admitted to practice law before this Court.
such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on the 15th day of August, 2016, I served copies of the foregoing
on the following persons:
William M. Schmalfeldt by First Class U. S. Mail to 3209 S. Lake Drive, Apt. 108,
St. Francis, Wisconsin 53235 (last known address)
William Ferguson by First Class U. S. Mail to 10808 Schroeder Road, Live Oak,
California 95953 (last known address)
Brett Kimberlin by First Class U. S. Mail to 8100 Beech Tree Road, Bethesda,
Maryland 20817 (last known address)
Tetyana Kimberlin by First Class U. S. Mail to 8100 Beech Tree Road, Bethesda,
Maryland 20817 (last known address)
Almighty Media by First Class U. S. Mail to 20079 Stone Oak Parkway, San
Antonio, Texas 78258 (last known address)
Breitbart Unmasked by First Class U. S. Mail to 20079 Stone Oak Parkway, San
Antonio, Texas 78258 (last known address)
AFFIDAVIT
I, William John Joseph Hoge, solemnly affirm under the penalties of perjury
that the contents of the foregoing paper are true to the best of my knowledge,
information, and belief.
Date: 15 August, 2016
William John Joseph Hoge