Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maddy Coy*
Child and Woman Abuse Studies
Unit, London Metropolitan
University, UK
Sexualisation
narrows girls
space for action,
their aspirations and
achievements by
re-defining femininity
and beauty as of
most importance
A subject of
academic and
populist commentary
and an emerging
issue of policy
debate
Milkshakes,
Lady Lumps and
Growing Up to Want
Boobies: How the
Sexualisation of
Popular Culture
Limits Girls Horizons
This article explores research evidence on the harmful impact of
sexualised popular culture on girls and young women, and draws
implications for the Every Child Matters (ECM) framework (Department
for Education and Skills, 2004). The key theme is how sexualisation
narrows girls space for action, their aspirations and achievements by
re-defining femininity and beauty as of most importance, but also the
negative impact on sexual relationships and interactions, with a
specific focus on portrayal of black girls and young women in terms
of the intersection of race and gender. Recommendations are made
for a gendered analysis of sexualisation to be incorporated into ECM
indicators and relevant policy measures. Copyright 2009 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
KEY WORDS: sexualisation; gender; girls; Every Child Matters
* Correspondence to: Dr Maddy Coy, Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London
Metropolitan University, Ladbroke House, 62-66 Highbury Grove, London N5 2AD, UK.
E-mail: m.coy@londonmet.ac.uk
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
373
All fundamentally
reinforce heterosexual norms
Particularly boys,
who are exposed to
sexualised media are
likely to perceive
women to be sex
objects
The gender
neutral basis of
ECM obscures the
differences in lived
experiences for boys
and girls
Child Abuse Review Vol. 18: 372383 (2009)
DOI: 10.1002/car
374
Coy
A picture of
womanhood that
narrows girls
horizons whilst
appearing to stretch
them into limitless
possibilities
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
375
Lamb and Brown (2006, p. 3) suggest that one of the key ways
in which sexualisation of girls is harmful is by the false promises
of choicesselling an identity story that they [marketers] call
girl power, characterised by the consumption of beauty products and clothes, and social popularity. Girl power is a popular
term for embracing a focus on appearance and femininity as
emblems of empowerment. Lamb and Brown (2006) draw particular attention to the Disney version of girlhood based on princessdom, baring midriffs, arching backs and an obsession with
mirrors, which they suggest parallels the fantasy woman of pornography. This is also reflected in a contemporary emphasis in
advertising and popular culture which depicts women as actively
celebrating sex-object status (Gill, 2007). Yet, pursuing these
ideals often prevents girls developing other skills and activities,
limiting their interests and opportunities (Rush and La Nauze,
2006). For younger girls, the preoccupation with shopping,
crushes on boys and attention to physical appearance potentially
limits creativity and identity exploration to a narrowly defined
version of femininity (Levin and Kilbourne, 2008). As this sexualised identity story is often regarded as not only gender appropriate but also an indicator of contemporary female empowerment,
where expressing a sexualised self and selling femininity/beauty
are manifestations that women can do and achieve anything they
choose, there is little scope to engage in discussions of it as
harmful to girls personal and social development.
Some, perhaps many, young women may find that a sexualised
identity gives them confidence and a sense that they are able to
take control of their lives by defining themselves in a way that
can be socially rewarding (Buckingham and Bragg, 2003;
Reay, 2001). However, for girls who do not identify with WAGS
(wives and girlfriends, typically used in relation to wealthy
footballers) and Bratz dolls, there are few voices offering
equivalent personal and social authority (Buckingham and Bragg,
2003). Young womens options for developing intellectual,
athletic, creative identities that do not embrace hyper-femininity
are stunteda process that Lamb and Brown (2006, p. 20) refer
to as girl typing. This is empirically demonstrated by Diane
Reays (2001) research with seven-year olds in UK schools,
which found that girls who adopted identities based on girl
power through overt heterosexuality were able to exercise
more social power than those identifying as nice girls or
tomboys. The tomboy position itself was dependent on belittling feminine characteristics and did not challenge the association of power with boys/masculinity. In other words, only by
being sexualised could girls occupy a space to misbehave and/or
be assertive (Reay, 2001). In light of this, aims for children to
develop self-confidence under the make a positive contribution
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Pursuing these
ideals often prevents
girls developing
other skills and
activities, limiting
their interests and
opportunities
376
It fixes sexualisation
as such a normal
route that there is
little space outside
of it
Coy
strand of ECM (DfES, 2004) may be limited for girls to selfconfidence based on sexualisation.
These values are encroaching further and further into childhood
due to the marketing strategy of age compression, where previously adult/adolescent products are aimed at younger and younger
children in order to guarantee more consumers (Lamb and Brown,
2006; Levin and Kilbourne, 2008). Perhaps the most extreme
example of this is the recent launch of the Heelarious range of
soft high-heeled shoes for babies from birth to six months. Eight
styles are available, some adorned with rhinestones and leopard
print, marketed as offering babies fun, hilarity and glamour (see
www.heelarious.com). One result of this age compression with
respect to sexualised products is that the transformation of the
sexualised self has become a development of the sexualised self.
When six-year olds are wearing jeans with princess across the
rear, having hair extensions, or singing about their lady lumps and
growing up to want boobies displaying a sexualised identity is no
longer a milestone of impending adulthood, but an integral part
of identity development itself. This is how sexualisation limits
girls space for actionat the same time as it seems to offer
opportunities for material gain, personal achievement and sociocultural acceptance, and thus widen girls choices, it fixes sexualisation as such a normal route that there is little space outside
of it. The ECM agenda includes under the enjoy and achieve
outcome the aim to achieve personal and social development
(DfES, 2004), but this is undoubtedly inhibited by this prescription of sexualised femininity.
The following section discusses how surveys show that increasing numbers of girls and young women seek careers reflecting the
values of sexualised culture: using the body as profit and selfimprovement through makeovers (Gill, 2007).
Sexualised Ambitions
63 per cent
considered glamour
model and 25 per
cent lap dancer
their ideal profession
from a list of choices
including teacher,
doctor
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
377
Less likely to
see the value or
relevance of
academic
achievement
Evaluating the
female body
against these
glossy photographs
cultivates a sense of
personal shortfall
378
Coy
Sexualised Relationships
A review of
sexualisation has
been commissioned
379
Almost a quarter of
14-year-old girls have
been coerced into
sexual acts
380
Sexual stereotypes
of racialised gender
subordination
Coy
Sexualisation leads
to poor self-image
and a lack of
confidence in girls
that affects health
and capacity to
reach potential
381
Conclusions
Are there paths through the forest of sexy diva princess pink shopping
hotties? (Lamb and Brown, 2006, p. 263.)
A strong counter
policy steer is
necessary
Being healthy,
staying safe,
enjoying and
achieving, and
making a positive
contribution
Their paths
navigated by
the topographical
features of
sexualisation and
a limited space
for action
382
Coy
Australian Senate Committee. 2008. Sexualisation of Children in the Contemporary Media. Parliament House: Canberra.
BBC. 2008. Sasha: Beauty Queen at 11. BBC One, 31 July.
BBC News. 2006. Children are taught pole dancing. Available: http://news.bbc.
co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/6173805.stm [29 May 2007].
Bordo S. 1997. Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato
to O.J. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Brown JD, LEngle KL, Pardun CJ, Guo G, Kenneavy K, Jackson C. 2006. Sexy
media matter: Exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and
magazines predicts black and white adolescents sexual behavior. Pediatrics
117(4, April): 10181027. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1406.
Buckingham D, Bragg S. 2003. Young People, Media and Personal Relationships. Advertising Standards Authority, British Board of Film Classification,
BBC, Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission: London.
Children Act 2004. London: The Stationery Office.
Coy M, Garner M. 2009. Glamour Modelling and the Marketing of Selfsexualisation: Critical Reflections. International Journal of Cultural Studies.
In press.
Daniel B, Featherstone B, Hooper C-A, Scourfield J. 2005. Why Gender Matters
for Every Child Matters. British Journal of Social Work 35(8): 13431355.
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch225.
DCSF 2007. The childrens plan: Buildings Brighter Futures. The Stationary
Office. London.
Deeley L. 2008. Im single, Im sexy, and Im only 13. The Times, 28 July.
Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2007. Childrens Plan: Building
Brighter Futures. The Stationery Office: London.
Department for Education and Skills. 2004. Every Child Matters: Change for
Children. DfES: Nottingham.
Department of Health. 2007. Sex, Drugs, Alcohol and Young People: A review
of the Impact Drugs and Alcohol Have on Young Peoples Sexual Behaviour.
DoH: London.
Gill R. 2007. Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.
European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2): 147166. DOI: 10.1177/
1367549407075898.
Hill Collins P. 2006. From Black Power to Hip Hop: Racism, Nationalism, and
Feminism. Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
Holland J, Ramazanoglu C, Sharpe S, Thomson R. 1998. The male in the read:
Young People, Heterosexuality and Power. London. Tufnell Press.
Home Office. 2009. Together We Can End Violence Against Women: A Consultation Paper. Home Office: London.
Jeffner S. 2000. Different space for action: The everyday meaning of young
peoples perception of rape. Paper at ESS Faculty Seminar, University of
North London, May.
Kelly L. 2005. The Wrong Debate: Reflections on Why Force is Not the Key
Issue with Respect to Trafficking in Women for Sexual Exploitation. Feminist
Review 73: 139144. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400086.
Lamb S, Brown L. 2006. Packaging Girlhood: Rescuing Our Daughters from
Marketers Schemes. St Martins Griffin: New York.
Levin D, Kilbourne J. 2008. So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids. Ballantine Books:
New York.
Lundgren E. 1998. The hand that strikes and comforts: Gender construction and
the tension between body and symbol. In Rethinking Violence Against Women,
Dobash RE, Dobash RP (eds). Sage: London.
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
383
Martino SC, Collins RL, Elliott MN, Strachman A, Kanouse DE, Berry SH.
2006. Exposure to Degrading versus Nondegrading Music Lyrics and Sexual
Behaviour among Youth. Pediatrics 118(2): 430441. DOI: 10.1542/
peds.2006-0131.
McRobbie A. 2007. Illegible rage: Reflections on young womens post
feminist disorders. Gender Institute, Sociology and ESRC New Femininities Series, 25 January. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/
LSEPublicLecturesAndEvents/pdf/20070125_McRobbie.pdf. 28 November
2008.
Peter J, Valkenburg PM. 2007. Adolescents Exposure to a Sexualised Media
environment and their Notions of Women as Sex Objects. Sex Roles 56:
318395. DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-9176.
Peterson SH, Wingood GM, DiClemente R, Harrington K, Davies, S. 2007.
Images of Sexual Stereotypes in Rap Videos and the Health of African
American Female Adolescents. Journal of Womens Health 16(8): 1157
1164. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0429.
Reay D. 2001. Spice Girls, Nice Girls, Girlies and Tomboys: Gender
Discourses, Girls Cultures and Femininities in the Primary Classroom.
Gender and Education 13(2): 153166. DOI: 10.1080/09540250120051178.
Redgrave K, Limmer M. 2005. It Makes You More Up For It: School Aged
Young Peoples Perspectives on Alcohol and Sexual Health. Rochdale
Metropolitan Borough Council: Rochdale.
Rose T. 2008. The Hip-Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About
Hip-hop and Why It Matters. Basic Books: New York.
Rush E, La Nauze A. 2006. Letting Children be Children: Stopping the Sexualisation of Children in Australia. The Australia Institute: Manuka.
Templeton S-K. 2008. Surge in breast enlargement operations as teens copy
celebrities. The Sunday Times, 23 March.
The CW Television Network. 20032009. Americas Next Top Model.
UNICEF. 2007. An Overview of Child Well-being in Rich Countries: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Lives and Well-being of Children and Adolescents in Economically Advanced Nations. UNICEF Innocenti Research
Centre: Florence.
WAFE/Bliss. 2008. Womens aid launches new teen domestic violence statistics
with Bliss magazine. Available: www.wafe.org.uk/domestic-violence-pressinformation. 11 March 2009.