Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 07-1698
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Benson Everett Legg, Chief District
Judge. (1:02-cv-02797-BEL)
Argued:
Decided:
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In
this
Fourteenth
civil
rights
Amendments
action
Equal
alleging
Protection
violations
Clause
and
of
the
Title
42
Entertainment,
LLC
(collectively
Plaintiffs)
appeal
that the City of Salisbury, Maryland, its police chief (in his
individual and official capacities), and the three members of
Wicomico
Countys
Board
of
License
Commissioners
(in
their
business,
because
it
hosted
nights
with
hip-hop
music
I.
On
Orgains),
October
through
25,
M31
2000,
Robert
Andromeda
and
Rebecca
Entertainment,
Orgain
LLC,
(the
opened
- 3 -
of
Wicomico
County,
Maryland.
Andromedas
profits
derived
Countys
Board
of
License
Commissioners
(the
Liquor
Board).
operated
at
least
four
nights
per
week
and
offered both live bands and disc jockeys, with each night having
a different theme.
SPD
for
had
received
fifty-eight
Calls
Service
concerning
- 4 -
Andromedas
approximately
first
2:30
shooting
a.m.,
on
incident
occurred
Wednesday
hip-hop
at
night.
fight
took
place
near
the
vehicle
of
an
Andromeda
Police
followed-up
Chief
by
Allan
sending
Webster
Robert
(Chief
Orgain
the
Webster)
following
(J.A.
810).
Chief
Webster
copied
the
Liquor
Board,
States
supporting
unspecified)
such
management
statistics;
changes
- 6 -
stated
at
that
Andromeda
recent
(but
had
been
implemented;
advised.
and
stated
that
he
would
keep
the
Liquor
Board
Task
Force
discovered
five
underage
drinkers
at
drivers
license.
Additionally,
all
five
underage
hearing,
testimony
Liquor
Board
Marylands
their
and
at
the
found
liquor
liquor
which
hearing
Orgains
the
laws,
license
were
Orgains
fined
for
the
five
Liquor
represented
guilty
them
of
days.
live
counsel,
ten
$5,000.00,
heard
violations
and
Although
the
of
suspended
the
Orgains
Andromeda.
in
Andromedas
parking
lot.
On
Thursday,
January
10,
ONE
EMPLOYEE WAS STRUCK OVER THE HEAD WITH A BOTTLE AND TRANSPORTED
TO [the hospital].
(J.A. 1078).
hand-delivery
by
an
SPD
officer,
sent
Robert
Orgain
following letter:
Dear Mr. Orgain:
In August of 2001, I sent you a letter concerning
calls for service at the Andromeda Nightclub. Of the
fifty-eight calls, almost half were of a violent
nature.
I asked you to take steps to reduce these
incidents in the hope it would decrease violence at
your establishment.
Since my letter, the Salisbury Police Department
has responded to an additional twenty-six incidents at
your nightclub. Of these twenty-six incidents, eleven
have been violence related. Of the eleven, two of the
cases involved the discharging of a handgun.
It is quite apparent to me that whatever measures
you have taken are ineffective which creates a very
unsafe condition.
I have discussed this continuing
problem with the States Attorney for Wicomico County
who has also expressed grave concern for your staff,
patrons and the police officers who respond to these
incidents.
As a result of your inability to maintain a safe
establishment, I will be seeking criminal sanctions
based
upon
this
history
of
violence
at
your
establishment.
- 8 -
the
(J.A.
938).
States
Chief
Attorney
Webster
Davis
again
Ruark,
copied
and
the
Liquor
Board,
Salisbury
Mayor
Barrie
(J.A. 2584).
discuss the matter with Robert Orgain and informed him that he
planned to meet with the States Attorney and would get back to
him after that.
Around
the
same
date,
Chief
Webster
informed
Salisbury
Major
Jeffrey
Livingston,
Salisburys
Assistant
Police
Attorney
sanctions
or
for
charges
Wicomico
were
County.
ever
Notably,
actually
filed
no
criminal
against
the
Plaintiffs.
In a letter dated January 15, 2002, Robert Orgain responded
in writing to Chief Websters January 11, 2002 letter.
Robert
screening
utilizing
metal
- 9 -
detector.
He
also
advised
cash
Andromeda
in
exchange
through
screening.
the
for
rear
allowing
door,
customers
thereby
escaping
to
enter
security
(J.A. 941).
notified
seven
other
businesses
that
they
too
had
Orgains
claim
under
the
(J.A. 948).
Equal
Of relevance to
Protection
Clause,
each
this
effort,
contact
Lieutenant
Calls
for
Service
to
Elmer
Davis
in
our
Id.
Andromeda
continued
after
BEATEN AND 750 DOLLARS WAS TAKEN FROM HIM LAST NIGHT AT THE
ANDROMEDA.
(J.A. 1078).
a.m., the SPD received a Call for Service because, between 2:00
a.m.
and
2:30
a.m.,
an
Andromeda
customer
had
been
shot
in
On Sunday,
May 19, 2002, at 2:00 a.m., the SPD received a Call for Service
to Andromeda, which the police blotter described as follows:
COMP ADVISED A SUBJECT PULLED A 10-32 OUT ON HIM.
AS OFFICER
FIRED
(J.A. 1079).
AT
0202
HRS,
POSSIBLY
TWO
DIFFERENT
SHOOTERS.
such
hearing,
Major
Livingston
of
the
SPD,
whom
the
to May 2002, the SPD had received forty-four Calls for Service
for Andromeda that we felt were of a violent nature or had the
potential
for
some
type
of
violence.
(J.A.
1000).
Major
Orgains
before
had
the
full
Liquor
opportunity
Board.
In
to
her
be
heard
testimony,
at
the
Rebecca
Orgain did not contend that any Calls for Service on the SPDs
books were fabricated.
Orgain
supplemented
his
wifes
testimony.
Among
other things, he informed the Liquor Board that, after the May
12, 2002 shooting incident, Andromeda had begun barricading its
parking lot at closing time.
- 12 -
twenty-one year olds who binge drink and then engage in mischief
for lack of better things to do in Salisbury.
called James Fountain Smith, who worked at Andromeda as a parttime disc jockey.
deal[s]
with
ninety
establishments.
percent
(J.A.
more
554)
black
people
(alteration
than
in
other
original).
the
Andromedas
Liquor
Calls
Board
for
that
Service
record,
office
and
had
was
reviewed
prepared
to
He stated
that there was no telling whether the grand jury would indict,
but
that
the
degree
of
violence
warranted
formal
investigation.
The
Liquor
Board
members
questioned
States
Attorney
see
similar
pattern
of
establishments.
- 13 -
at
other
county
that
symptomatic
of
the
a
violence
larger
occurring
community
Rebecca Orgain
at
problem.
Andromeda
was
As
she
proof,
entered into evidence the Calls for Service history for Brew
River, a large restaurant/nightclub in Salisbury.
She pointed
out
similar
that
Brew
River
had
problems
with
violence
to
on
Rebecca
Orgains
testimony,
Liquor
Board
Brew
related.
Rivers
Calls
for
Service
were
largely
traffic
the
Liquor
Board
concluded
the
Orgains
had
state
surrendered
court.
their
Instead,
liquor
on
June
license
12,
and
2002,
the
Orgains
permanently
closed
Andromeda.
- 14 -
On
August
22,
2002,
Plaintiffs
filed
the
present
civil
asserting
Amended
both
federal
Complaint,
the
and
one
state
law
relevant
to
(2)
Chief
capacities;
Webster,
(3)
in
Wicomico
both
the
The
present
his
County;
claims.
individual
(4)
Liquor
and
Board
(collectively
Defendants).
The
Second
Amended
were based upon federal law, and Counts IV, V, and VI were based
upon state law.
Only Counts I and III are at issue in the present appeal.
Count
I,
Defendants
brought
pursuant
violated
to
Plaintiffs
42
U.S.C.
rights
under
1983,
the
alleged
Fourteenth
Count III,
brought
Defendants
pursuant
intentionally
to
42
interfered
U.S.C.
with
1981,
Plaintiffs
alleges
rights
- 15 -
to
form
On
appeal,
of
Plaintiffs
challenge
the
district
courts
grant
III
( 1981),
in
favor
of
(1)
Chief
Webster,
in
his
individual and official capacities; (2) the City; and (3) Liquor
Board Commissioners Shirley Gray, Leo McNeil, and W.C. Holloway,
in their individual and official capacities.
II.
We review the district courts grant of summary judgment de
novo.
329
(4th
Cir.
2006).
Summary
judgment
is
appropriate
when,
See Anderson
In resolving
motion
for
summary
judgment,
the
evidence
presented
must
See
Smith,
84
F.3d
at
675.
However,
neither
summary
judgment;
rather,
if
the
adverse
party
fails
to
Football Club, Inc., 346 F.3d 514, 522 (4th Cir. 2003) (internal
quotation marks, alteration marks, and citations omitted).
III.
We
first
address
Plaintiffs
challenge
to
the
district
individual
capacity
with
respect
to
Count
I,
alleging
- 17 -
relevant
person
part,
within
laws.
its
that
[n]o
State
jurisdiction
shall
. . .
deny
to
any
equal
protection
of
the
the
Clause
limits
denying
all
person
administration,
or
state
action,
equal
protection
enforcement
of
prohibiting
through
its
laws
any
the
and
state
from
enactment,
regulations.
Front Royal & Warren County Indus. Park Corp. v. Town of Front
Royal, 135 F.3d 275, 289 (4th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation
marks & emphasis omitted).
Plaintiffs
Chief
Webster
theories:
in
his
their
Equal
individual
Protection
capacity
claim
on
the
against
following
substantially
Andromeda
premise
greater
on
predominantly
police
hip-hop
black
presence
nights,
customers,
than
in
which
on
the
parking
nights
non-hip-hop
lot
of
attracted
nights
at
nights
were
predominantly
black,
while
Brew
Rivers
if
they
needed
assistance
with
Andromedas
crime
macro
level,
Plaintiffs
Equal
Protection
claim
See Yick Wo v.
Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 373-74 (1886) (Though the law itself be
fair on its face, and impartial in appearance, yet, if it is
applied and administered by public authority with an evil eye
and
an
unequal
illegal
hand,
so
as
discriminations
practically
between
to
make
persons
unjust
in
and
similar
v.
Hansen,
326
F.3d
569,
584
(4th
Cir.
2003)
Equal
prove
that
Protection
the
discriminatory
Clause
challenged
purposes.
does
action
not
require
rested
Arlington
Plaintiffs
solely
Heights
Notably,
v.
on
to
racially
Metro.
Hous.
the
legal
principles
we
just
set
forth
to
the
summary
judgment
stage,
were
required
to
proffer
on
hip-hop
nights,
was
similarly
situated
(1)
to
week;
and
(2)
Chief
Webster
intentionally
caused
2002)
[plaintiff]
(To
must
first
on
an
demonstrate
equal
that
protection
he
has
been
claim,
treated
the
unequal
treatment
was
the
result
of
intentional
or
we
agree
with
Plaintiffs
argument
that
the
objectively
unreasonable
under
the
circumstances.
While
violation,
would
be
probative
on
the
issue
of
is
Protection claim.
not
stand-alone
element
of
an
Equal
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996) (We think [our] cases
foreclose any argument that the constitutional reasonableness of
traffic
stops
depends
individual
officers
petitioners
that
on
the
involved.
the
actual
We
motivations
of
Constitution
course
of
agree
prohibits
the
with
selective
the
constitutional
discriminatory
basis
application
of
for
objecting
laws
is
the
to
intentionally
Equal
Protection
our
further
analysis
will
explain,
however,
the
district
Plaintiffs
primary
evidence
in
support
of
their
- 21 -
for
arguendo
a
that
reasonable
Plaintiffs
jury
to
proffered
find
the
sufficient
SPD
had
evidence
Andromeda,
on
for
hip-hop
reasonable
nights,
was
jury
to
similarly
find
that
situated
to
in
threat
to
hip-hop
public
nights
safety
at
than
Andromeda
presented
non-hip-hop
nights
a
at
Cf. United
factors
that
might
justify
making
different
after
Andromeda
was
closing
time.
generally
Second,
open
at
least
despite
the
four
nights
fact
that
per
week
between October 25, 2000 and January 11, 2002 (the date of Chief
Websters second warning letter to Robert Orgain), thirty-two of
thirty-six Calls for Service to Andromeda relating to violent
- 23 -
the same time period of October 25, 2000 to January 11, 2002,
Andromeda had three shooting incidents, each on a different hiphop night, while Brew River had none.
time
period,
there
were
two
assaults
on
police
officers
at
failed
situated
police-presence
prosecution
to
proffer
element
theory
theory,
with
and
sufficient
of
their
their
respect
to
evidence
on
the
substantially-greater-
discriminatory-threat-oftheir
Equal
Protection
affirm
the
district
court,
we
now
turn
to
consider
In this regard,
- 24 -
Andromedas
operation,
Plaintiffs
contacted
the
NAACP
on
Salisbury,
clientele
because
on
hip-hop
of
Andromedas
nights;
(2)
predominantly
according
to
black
deposition
located
in
Salisbury,
asked
Chief
Websters
advice
Chief
Webster
suggested
stopping
the
serving
of
alcohol
changing
the
format
to
country
tightening
the
dress
earlier
the
evening,
in
western;
(5)
Chief
code,
and
Webster
made
in
response
to
Chief
- 25 -
Websters
January
11,
2002
letter; (6) Chief Webster copied the Liquor Board, the States
Attorney, and the Mayor on his two warning letters to Robert
Orgain, but did not copy the same officials on his February 7,
2002
letters
to
the
seven
other
businesses
in
which
Chief
Davis,
club.
(J.A.
privately
2716).
teased
These
him
for
anecdotal
working
bits
of
at
n----r
circumstantial
caused
customers
by
Chief
Webster,
on
hip-hop
nights
in
part,
were
because
predominantly
reasonable
jury,
viewing
the
evidence
in
the
that
any
comparable
increase
- 26 -
of
police
presence
at
Andromeda
on
hip-hop
prosecute
Andromeda
nights
under
and
the
Chief
Websters
nuisance
laws
threats
to
solely
in
were
until
shooting
incident
had
occurred.
In
fact,
Chief Webster sent each of his letters to Robert Orgain the day
after a shooting incident at Andromeda on a hip-hop night had
occurred.
recommend
testified
record,
in
the
Andromeda
his
for
prosecution. 6
deposition,
things
that
without
really
As
Chief
contradiction
concerned
me
and
Webster
in
drew
the
my
that
had
taken
place
inside
and
outside
the
- 27 -
Andromeda.
(J.A.
1692).
In
sum,
assuming
arguendo
that
to
find
that
Andromeda
on
hip-hop
nights
was
similarly
discrimination element.
City
of
Myrtle
(disparate
Beach,
420
treatment
F.3d
alone
322,
is
328-29
(4th
insufficient
Cir.
to
2005)
support
otherwise
that
they
could
contact
Salisburys
Community
Affairs Division for help with their crime problem while doing
so in letters to seven other businesses in Salisbury, fails for
lack of evidence of racially discriminatory intent on the part
of Chief Webster.
letter
offering
Lieutenant
Elmer
Davis
as
helpful
contact was Club Vissage, which club Keith Orgain, son of the
Orgains and employee of Andromeda, stated in a sworn affidavit
catered
to
African
Americans
. . .
- 28 -
(J.A.
2877).
Any
conclusion,
we
affirm
the
district
courts
grant
of
with
respect
to
Count
I,
alleging
violation
of
the
IV.
We
next
address
Plaintiffs
argument
that
the
district
We
- 29 -
Plaintiffs
premise
Count
against
the
City
and
Chief
support
of
this
theory,
Plaintiffs
rely
upon
the
same
Chief
Webster
in
his
official
capacity
as
the
City, Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 & 244 n.8
(4th Cir. 1999), Plaintiffs Equal Protection claim against the
City fails, because a municipality may not be found liable for
a constitutional violation in the absence of an unconstitutional
act on the part of at least one individual municipal actor.
International Ground Transp. v. Mayor and City Council of Ocean
City, Md., 475 F.3d 214, 219 (4th Cir. 2007).
Accordingly, we
V.
We
now
turn
to
consider
the
Orgains
argument
that
the
capacities,
with
respect
to
Count
I,
alleging
Board
Commissioners.
following
three
factual
suspending
the
Orgains
The
Orgains
circumstances:
liquor
license
(1)
did
pointed
the
not
to
two
set
the
orders
forth
- 31 -
during the June 4, 2002 hearing before the Liquor Board, James
Fountain Smith, an assistant disc jockey at Andromeda remarked
that Andromeda deal[s] with ninety percent more black people
than
other
establishments.
(J.A.
554)
(alteration
in
original).
The district court concluded that no fair-minded jury could
find
that
race
played
any
role
in
the
Liquor
Board
regard,
the
district
court
first
noted
that
the
In
Liquor
By noting this
fact, the district court was apparently relying upon the common
sense
notion
that,
as
member
of
the
same
race
as
the
as
the
plaintiff
does
not
preclude
successful
Id. at *8 n.4.
noted
that
Liquor
Board
- 32 -
Commissioner
W.C.
Holloway
testified
during
his
deposition
in
this
case,
without
summary
in
its
orders
of
suspension.
Fourth,
with
that
it
added
five
more
days
to
Andromedas
second
the
record
knowledge,
Andromeda
nights. 9
at
that
the
served
the
time
Liquor
they
Board
issued
predominantly
black
Commissioners
such
had
suspension,
clientele
on
any
that
hip-hop
- 33 -
VI.
We
also
affirm
the
district
courts
grant
of
summary
the
Equal
Protection
Clause.
Treating
the
Liquor
Board
The record
suspend
the
Orgains
liquor
license,
the
Liquor
Board
Board
to
discriminate
County,
Okla.
v.
Brown,
against
businesses
serving
U.S.
397,
403-04
(1997)
10
- 34 -
of
constitutional
right
through
policy
or
grant
of
custom).
VII.
Plaintiffs
also
challenge
the
district
courts
and
intentional
the
City,
with
respect
interference
with
their
to
Count
rights
to
III,
alleging
contract
with
1981
guarantees
that
[a]ll
persons
within
the
42 U.S.C. 1981.
In the
Section 1981
contractual
relationship,
as
well
as
when
racial
as
the
plaintiff
has
or
would
have
rights
under
the
Dominos Pizza,
their
1981
claim
under
- 35 -
the
burden-shifting
proof
792
According
(1973),
to
for
employment
Plaintiffs,
they
can
discrimination
avail
claims.
themselves
of
the
See Love-Lane v.
Martin, 355 F.3d 766, 786 (4th Cir. 2004) (plaintiff alleging
race
discrimination
in
violation
of
1981,
based
only
upon
1981
liability
on
Chief
Plaintiffs seek to
Webster,
in
his
individual
predominantly
black
clientele
on
hip-hop
nights.
facie
judgment
case,
stage,
under
they
McDonnell
Douglas,
proffer
sufficient
must
at
the
summary
evidence
for
Cf. Love-Lane,
in
his
individual
capacity.
- 36 -
Needless
to
say,
the
capacity,
with
respect
to
Count
III.
Because
VIII.
As their final issue, Plaintiffs contend the district court
erred
in
failing
to
address
the
Liquor
This
Boards
issue
is
assertion
a
of
nonstarter
11
- 37 -
relied
upon
Eleventh
Amendment
Immunity
defense
only
if
IX.
In conclusion, we affirm the entry of judgment with respect
to Counts I and III.
AFFIRMED
- 38 -