Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:00-cr-00162-F-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Curtis
Lee
Terry
sentence
imposed
upon
revocation
release.
the
district
court
did
appeals
not
the
of
his
address
his
will
not
disturb
twenty-four-month
term
of
supervised
assertion
that
his
We affirm.
sentence
imposed
after
range
and
is
not
plainly
unreasonable.
United
this
determination,
sentence is unreasonable.
we
first
Id. at 438.
consider
whether
In
the
652, 656 (4th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citations
omitted).
Although
district
court
ultimately
has
broad
factors
applicable
to
revocation
sentences
under
18
hearing,
Terrys
U.S.C.
the
revocation
counsel
difficult
the
time
in
prison
system,
and
that
he
had
the county jail, they were not aware that he was deaf, and
thought he was ignoring directions and orders.
Counsel also
determining
Terrys
revocation
sentence,
the
statutory
3553(a).
requirements,
The
court
and
concluded
the
that
relevant
a
factors
in
twenty-four-month
conduct
upon
his
release,
the
dangerousness
of
his
institution
that
will
afford
him
treatment
for
his
hearing
disorder.
This sentence is not plainly unreasonable.
461 F.3d at 437-39.
Crudup,
sentence.
revocation judgment.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
we
affirm
the
contentions
the
Accordingly,
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED