Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 14-4628
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cr-00297-REP-1)
Submitted:
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
September 3, 2015
and
DAVIS,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Marnae
Devon
Snead
appeals
the
eighteen-month
term
of
whether
Sneads
sentence
is
plainly
unreasonable.
we affirm.
The
sentence
district
after
court
revoking
has
broad
discretion
defendants
to
impose
supervised
release.
United States v. Webb, 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013).
Thus,
United States v.
Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 439 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation
marks omitted).
In reviewing a revocation sentence, we must first decide
whether the sentence is unreasonable.
so,
we
follow
generally
the
Id. at 438.
procedural
and
In doing
substantive
Id.
the
Sentencing
Guidelines
and
2
the
applicable
18
U.S.C.
3553(a)
(2012)
factors,
id.
at
439,
and
has
provided
some
Only if we
unreasonable
that
it
because
considered
the
the
district
applicable
court
advisory
did
not
policy
Henderson
v.
United
States,
133
S.
Ct.
1121,
1126
(2013).
from
his
Grade
supervised
release
violation,
he
Accordingly, we
See 18
accordance
with
Anders,
we
have
reviewed
the
entire
We
therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
counsel
believes
that
counsel
may
in
move
representation.
and
legal
this
petition
Court
for
would
leave
to
be
frivolous,
withdraw
from
such
conclusions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
Court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED