Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-1891
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:12-cv-01198-GRA)
Submitted:
Decided:
January 2, 2013
PER CURIAM
Phillip
order
denying
Andrew
his
Bridges
motion
for
an
appeals
the
extension
district
of
time
courts
to
file
We affirm.
and
denying
the
appointment
of
counsel,
the
district
U.S.C.A.
636(b)(1)(B)
(West
2006
&
Supp.
2012).
The
timely
judges
filing
of
specific
recommendation
is
objections
necessary
to
to
preserve
parties
have
noncompliance.
Cir.
1985);
Bridges
warned
of
the
consequences
of
see
has
been
also
waived
Thomas
v.
appellate
Arn,
474
review
by
U.S.
140
failing
(1985).
to
file
deny
dispense
Bridges
with
contentions
are
request
oral
for
argument
adequately
the
appointment
because
presented
in
the
the
of
facts
counsel
and
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
To the extent Bridges raises new claims for the first time
on appeal, we decline to address them.
See Muth v. United
States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).