Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 13-4969
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:05-cr-00705-GRA-1)
Submitted:
May 8, 2014
DUNCAN,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Leshanta Sullivan appeals from the ten-month sentence
imposed upon the district courts revocation of his supervised
release.
he
appeal
asserts
but
that
questions
unreasonable.
there
are
whether
Although
no
meritorious
Sullivans
advised
of
grounds
sentence
his
is
right
to
sentence
should
be
imposed
affirmed
after
if
it
of
is
the
738
F.3d
638,
640
(4th
Cir.
plainly
file
We affirm.
revocation
within
for
supervised
statutory
United States v.
2013)
(quoting
United
In
making
the
this
determination,
we
first
consider
whether
procedurally
reasonable
if
the
district
court
considered
the
the
court
need
not
be
as
detailed
or
specific
when
receive
maximum.
the
sentence
imposed,
not unreasonable.
We
within
Id. at 439.
conclude
statutory
the
statutory
that
Sullivans
sentence
the
Chapter
factors.
The
policy
court
is
both
statements
emphasized
and
relevant
Sullivans
repeated
Finally,
within
the
the
district
policy
court
statement
properly
range
imposed
and
below
a
the
statutory maximum.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire
record
and
Accordingly,
have
we
found
affirm
no
the
meritorious
district
grounds
courts
for
appeal.
judgment.
This
review.
but
If
counsel
the
client
believes
requests
that
such
that
a
petition
petition
would
be
be