Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 15-2139
RICHARD MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY; STATES
ATTORNEY JOHN MCCARTHY; ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY CHRISTINA
FAVRETTO; ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY KAREN MOONEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15cv-02429-PWG)
Submitted:
Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.
and
FLOYD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Richard
Martin
appeals
the
district
courts
order
On
appeal,
Martin
challenges
the
district
courts
conclusion that his claims were untimely and barred by quasijudicial immunity.
however, the named prosecuting attorneys were subject to quasijudicial immunity for conduct intimately associated with the
judicial phase of the criminal process.
79
F.3d
372,
376
(4th
Cir.
1996)
(internal
quotation
marks
omitted).
The district court also properly concluded that Martins
action was untimely.
state
law
longest,
or
42
U.S.C.
three-year
1983
statute
of
(2012),
were
limitations.
subject
See
to,
Md.
at
Code
Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. 5-101 (2013) (general civil statute of
limitations); Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc.
(actions
States
for
assault
Attorneys
and
Office,
defamation);
767
F.3d
379,
5-105 (2013)
Owens
v.
Balt.
City
388
(4th
Cir.
2014)
While
is
barred
by
his
termination requirement.
inability
to
meet
the
favorable
(Md. 2000).
A Socy Without
a Name v. Virginia, 655 F.3d 342, 348 (4th Cir. 2011) (accrual
under 1983); Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda, 43 A.3d 1029,
1034-34,
1039-41
(Md.
2012)
(discussing
accrual
and
tolling
under state law); see also Natl Advert. Co. v. Raleigh, 947
F.2d
1158,
violations
1166-67
(4th
doctrine).
Cir.
Finally,
1991)
(describing
because
Martins
continuing
claims
were
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
AFFIRMED