cases:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yk0z5w3uqe41z73/AAD7p-pYFdNlkxSyUCQA83SPa?dl=0
audio:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h047q362frp08nn/AAAoB4WJ56rp4w9pFh_QSymfa?dl=0

Nag umpisa muna ulit sa jurisdiction. Ganun uli yung tanong- sc, ca, rtc, inferi
or courts then hypos. In rem, in personam, quasi in rem, personal, real action,
examples. Defn of actions: civil, crim, special, commencement -payment of docket
fees/jurisdiction, when not applicable (basically puro codal lang rule 1 then k
onting follow up questions as to what rules should govern crim, civil etc.) Nagt
agal lang dun sa docket fees, if not paid, when jurisdiction attaches, pwede ban
g hindi bayaran, why important to note when jurisdiction attaches. Rule 2- Caus
e of action, one suit single cause, splitting, joinder (recite as written in the
codal). Joinder of parties, ada v baylon. Di pa kame tapos sa rule 2 actually n
ag end dun sa joinder
Yung 4 na cases sa rule 2 tapos follow up questions. Anticipatory breach, cause
of action, misjoinder- when is there misjoinder?, joinder of action
Tapos give examples yhytmfgxor situation sa mga
misjoinder, anticipatory breach
Mahaba yung sa joinder of action letter c- isnt the rtc invading the jurisdictio
n of other courts under bp129? Does rule 2 confer jurisdiction? Recovery of dama
ges & unlawful detainer- What if motion to dismiss only on 2nd action? Discretio
nary or mandatory to dismiss on rtc? If doesnt dismiss will the decision be vali
d if it decides to rule on the case? What if misjoinder in inferior courts? What
if both special civil actions?
If both special civil actions- hindi pwede joinder kase each special civil actio
n follows their own rules- sabe ni sir yan
From 3E, Rule 3 lang kame kanina. 2 cases: banda & navarro. Parties in interest,
spouses as parties, permissive joinder, indispensable, necessary parties, unwil
ling co-plaintiff, class suit, alternative defendant/plaintiff, transfer of inte
rest
Nagtagal sa class suit, transfer of interest, nonjoinder of indispensable v nonj
oinder of necessary (sanctions, which has a more severe sanction?)
Spouses as parties, co-ownership, partnership medyo madame din natanong dito. In
relation with the case - navarro vs escobido
Start na kame agad ng rule 4. Rule 4 & summary proc lang natanong, no cases
Sa rule 4 tatanong provs, diff of jurisdiction & venue, hypos tapos nabalikan yu
ng how to acquire jurisdiction over the person of the accused. Kase may hypo siy
a about saan ifafile if defendant is abroad, so natanong paano magkakaroon ng ju
risdiction sa kanya
*over the person of the defendant, not accused hehe
Then summary proc, aralin mo na lahat ng provs ng summary proc. Nasa bandang dul
o ng codal yun. Tatanong niya yung cases involved (civil & crim), pleadings allo
wed, then hypo about sa motion to dismiss if improper venue (study sec. 4, sec.
19 of summary proc, rule 16 & non waivable defenses in relation to this; dapat m
adistinguish mo kelan lang pwede mag dismiss motu proprio ang court on all the g
rounds sa rule 16), then tatanong niya din yung procedure mismo secs 3-10 (di na
man kelangan verbatim pero dapat malahad mo pano yung daloy & yung mga periods),
tinanong niya din yung procedure sa crim cases
Brgy conciliation lang kame kanina. May mass kase maaga kame dinismiss
Cases governed by bgry conciliation; accion reinvidicatoria included? No ceiling
, even millions? Orig jurisdiction that will need brgy conciliation? Procedure;

is pangkat diff from the lupon? Form of settlement; miguel case, araling mabuti!
Art 2041: is it not splitting of action, u file in lupon then in the court? Def
n of compromise in the civil code; repudiation in lgc vs repudiation in civil co
de, reconcile; arbitration in lupon, procedure; arbitration award: petition to n
ullify award before inferior courts vs jurisdiction of ca & rtc over annulment o
f judgments (bp 129); transmittal of settlement; execution; for what amt, amicab
le or original demand? Hypos; explain how to effect execution; why do you think
that lupon can only levy personal prop? May natackle lang ng konti sa small clai
ms dun sa hypo, yung hypo kase regarding sa amt less than 100k. So tinanong niya
na din ano cover ng small claims
*orig jurisdiction of ca that will need brgy conciliation
Sa 3S, umabot na hanggang rule 6. Pero kase advanced talaga sila samen ng 1 mtg.
Medyo nag ooverlap lang yung topics namen
Sabi ni classmate ko kahapon daw eto natanong:
Nagstart sa rule 9, di na tinackle yung from rule 6
Rule 9 in rel to rule 11 as to periods of filing of answer
Rule 10, sec 5
Swagman case
Hindi na per section magtanong. More on correlation & application in case summar
y proc
Konting small claims
Next mtg (bukas) till rule 19
Babalikan daw backlogs like summary proc
demurrer to evidence
compare effect of MTD (rule 16) & demurrer (take note: non waivable defenses)
demurrer granted - appeal, can he not use rule 37?
why if revived on appeal, there is a waiver? see BP 129 when CA can receive evid
ence
demurrer in civil and crim cases (take note: leave of court)
in crim cases: if acquittal, can he appeal?
if acquittal, can he appeal on civil aspect?
judgment on pleadings
judgment on compromise - no appeal
compare with compromise agreement in brgy conciliation
in judgment on compromise, can he also use the option in civil code: consider it
rescinded and go for the orgiinal? NO, res judicata. unlike in lupon (not a cou
rt of justice that's why no res judicata)
Rule 47
Rule 45
Rule 50
Certificate of non forum shopping
Rule 5
Memorandum of decision
Rule 39 - redemption, execution of personal prop, discretionary exec, last 2 sec
s uli, life of a writ of execution. Diyan nag revolve yung discussion