Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-4664
Submitted:
GREGORY,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to a written plea agreement, David Jackson
pled guilty to distribution of cocaine base.
Jacksons counsel
(1967),
stating
that,
in
counsels
view,
there
are
no
We
affirm.
In fulfilling our duty under Anders, we have reviewed
the guilty plea for any error, and find none.
The district
court
in
fully
Jacksons
complied
guilty
with
plea.
Fed.
The
R.
Crim.
court
P.
11
ensured
accepting
that
Jackson
reviewed
Jacksons
sentence
and
determined
United States v. Llamas, 599 F.3d 381, 387 (4th Cir. 2010).
2
The
district
court
sentencing
followed
Jackson,
the
necessary
appropriately
procedural
treated
the
steps
in
Sentencing
3553(a)
(2006)
characteristics
factors
and
in
light
of
circumstances.
Jackson's
The
individual
district
court
We conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the
chosen sentence.
Allen, 491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir. 2007) (applying appellate
presumption of reasonableness to within Guidelines sentence).
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire
record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
appeal.
writing,
of
the
right
to
petition
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
AFFIRMED