Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-2143
DONNA DEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAIMLER CHRYSLER LIFE, DISABILITY AND HEALTH CARE BENEFITS
PROGRAM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-02992-RDB)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Donna Dean appeals the district courts order granting
summary judgment in favor of Daimler Chrysler Life, Disability
and Health Care Benefits Program (Chrysler) in this Employee
Retirement
reviewed
Income
the
Security
parties
Act
briefs
action.
and
the
We
record
have
on
carefully
appeal
and
adequately
support
the
arguments
with
Counsel failed
specific
facts
and
Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (Failure to
comply with the specific dictates of [Rule 28] with respect to a
particular claim triggers abandonment of the claim on appeal.);
Carducci v. Regan, 714 F.2d 171, 177 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (Scalia,
Cir. J.) (declining to review asserted but unanalyzed . . .
claim because appellate courts do not sit as self-directed
boards
of
legal
inquiry
and
research,
but
[rather]
. . .
as
them).
This
court
cannot
assume
counsels
duty
to
to
information
take
into
related
account
only
to
Chryslers
financial
whether
conflict
woes,
of
that
interest
existed.
Inc. Assocs. Health & Welfare Plan, 201 F.3d 335, 342-43 (4th
Cir. 2000) (discussing eight factors pursuant to which courts
determine whether an abuse of discretion exists).
Moreover,
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
AFFIRMED