Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-1469
Submitted:
November 2, 2012
DAVIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
H. Raymond Fasano, YOUMAN, MADEO & FASANO, LLP, New York, New
York, for Petitioners.
Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Gregory D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Kathryn L. DeAngelis, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Alibek
V.
Turkayev
and
Vera
Belan
(collectively,
the
immigration
judges
(IJs)
order
denying
the
the record and the contentions of the parties, and we deny the
petition for review.
When assessing an aliens petition for review, we must
uphold the Boards determination that an alien is not eligible
for
asylum
or
withholding
of
removal
unless
the
Boards
(quoting
U.S.C.
1252(b)(4)(D)
(2006)).
Legal
findings
adjudicator
contrary.
Valladares v.
Holder,
Consequently,
the
of
fact
would
U.S.C.
632
Boards
be
are
conclusive
compelled
1252(b)(4)(B)
F.3d
117,
determination
124
to
unless
decide
(2006);
(4th
regarding
Cir.
to
any
the
Crespin2011).
eligibility
Petitioners
claim
before
this
court
is
very
that
counsel.
and
we
they
did
not
receive
ineffective
assistance
of
that
the
Petitioners
arguments
are
without
merit.
Accordingly,
dispense
with
oral
we
deny
argument
the
petition
because
the
for
facts
review.
and
We
legal
PETITION DENIED