Professional Documents
Culture Documents
channel
electroencephalogram
was
analyzed
with
five
Retrieval,
Web
Browsing,
NeuroMarketing,
Chlssification.
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
A.
EXPERIMENTAL
Subjects
2939
LCD
(27 inch)
Eye Tracking
Device
I-(EMR-9)
Figure 1.
C.
PC
(laptop)
I--
Subject
(51-55)
bio5ignal
Amplifier
I-(Polymate II)
Tasks
a!!
.31:'
::II:
.!I[
#1.
'
.'
'T'
If
iN.
l1Iffl
JIl
!fiIl
!I[
:0:.
.;r;
:!i!
ttl
"F-li
i!*
tlii;
litH
i*.
1t1:J
mj]
)I;
Ul:Wi
iEll
!;
811)
tt
}.,;1;i
-.
*'
jj.
:t:::t
:!Il'
Pi
:Jli
AT
I.
an:
. ,I!
IBM
II
[{i
_'!:r
Figure 2.
.f)!
Average EEG
3:
-10
@
w
EOO
--
5 -L
m
0
--
AN AL YSES
Figure 3.
B.
--
-L
--
--
(target)
EOO (standard)
EMG (target)
==
--
time [sec]
Average EEG, EOGs and EMG [7].
EEG Classification
2940
DECODING PERFORMANCE
classification
standard
target
__
sI
s2
s3
s4
s5
C.
task
task
task
task
task
target
standard
target
precision
10
0.84
0.85
31
0.78
0.76
12
0.82
0.88
36
0.84
0.75
58
0.89
0.92
target
standard
recall
..
7
5
38
0.88
0.84
target
41
21
0.66
0.73
standard
15
28
0.65
0.57
target
44
20
0.69
0.83
34
0.77
0.63
standard
standard
Figure 4.
2941
IV.
hand, the opposite direction was taken into account only for
standard retrieval task. This point will be investigated in online
application of web browsing with the algorithm of complete
removal of artifacts from eye movements.
V.
SUMMARY
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
2942