Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: Six fermented acerola ice creams were produced, containing different starter cultures (Bifidobacterium
longum, Bi.lactis, and traditional yogurt starter cultureStreptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii
spp. bulgaricus) and final pH (5 and 4.5). The ice creams were evaluated for probiotic culture viability, vitamin C
stability, and sensory acceptance. Mix fermentations were stopped when pH 5.0 and 5.5 were attained. However,
after the addition of acerola pulp the determined pH were 4.5 and 5, respectively. Mixes were frozen and stored for
15 wk at 18 C. The viable counts for probiotic cultures remained above the recommended minimum limit of 106
cfu/g during 15 wk storage even in products with pH 4.5. Vitamin C concentration remained around 140 mg/100 g of
product. The attributes of aroma, taste, texture, and overall acceptance obtained scores in the range of 5.15 to 7.22.
The fermented acerola ice cream was a suitable food for the delivery of vitamin C and Bifidobacterium strains with
excellent viability and acceptable sensory characteristics.
Keywords: Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, dairy dessert, frozen yogurt
Introduction
S492
C 2006 Institute of Food Technologists
doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00100.x
Further reproduction without permission is prohibited
pH
The pH of mixes and ice creams were measured using a digital
pH meter (Marte, Brazil).
Probiotics viability
Prior to and immediately after freezing the product, samples were
taken to assess the viability of probiotic microorganisms by plate
count. During the next 15 wk of storage, the product was regularly
examined for probiotic cell viability. Samples of ice cream (25 g)
were serially diluted (w/w) with 2% citrate solution and the spread
inoculated in duplicate onto plates of MRS agar (Acumedia, Lansing, Mich., U.S.A.). Inoculated plates were incubated at 37 C for 72
h, anerobically (Anaerobac, Probac, Brazil). The resulting colonies
were counted and total viable populations calculated per gram of
product (Favaro-Trindade and Grosso 2002).
Tests were carried out in triplicate.
Determination of vitamin C
Storage
weeks
Mix
0
1
3
6
9
12
15
B. longum
pH 4.5
5.4 108aA
2.6 108aA
3.6 108aA
3.5 108aA
3.4 108aA
3.8 108aA
2.7 108aA
3.2 108aA
pH 5.0
2.3 108aB
1.7 108abA
1.2 108bcB
1.1 108bcB
1.2 108bcB
9.6 107cA
9.3 107cB
1.3 108bcB
B. lactis
pH 4.5
6.5 108aA
1.1 108aA
4.3 108aA
6.4 108aA
5.7 108aA
5.0 108aA
5.1 108aA
4.5 108aA
pH 5.0
2.1 108bB
1.0 108bB
5.1 107aB
1.3 108bA
1.6 108bA
1.4 108bB
1.3 108bA
1.4 108bB
a,b,c
Means within the same column with different letters are significantly
different (P < 0.05).
Means within the same row with different letters are significantly different
(P < 0.05).
A,B
S493
Sensory evaluation
Determination of vitamin C
Vitamin C was monitored in the mix and ice creams to verify
the effect of freezing and frozen storage on this nutrient. The results for vitamin C concentration in mix fermented by B. longum,
B. lactis, or traditional yogurt starter culture and acerola ice creams
newly produced and stored for up to 15 wk, varied between 143.4
and 137.0 mg/100 g, with average values of 141.7 mg/100 g and
standard deviation of 2.13. The concentration of vitamin C was not
affected by the process employed in the production, pH, frozen storage, and by the microorganism used as starter culture, once the
concentration did not change significantly (P < 0.05) for any of the
treatments tested. According to Yamashita and others (2003), acerola
products going through a process of pasteurization and freezing
showed greater vitamin C retention at the end of the storage period.
Sensory analysis
A good sensory quality is required by all food products and very
limited information has been reported on the effects of probiotic
cultures in ice cream or frozen yogurts and sensory quality of these
products.
Acerola fermented ice creams were evaluated by an untrained
panel composed of 40 women and 26 men, aged 18 to 50.
The results presented in Table 2 show the means attributed by
the panelists for the acceptance test. In general, the samples had
good acceptance, range of 6.53 to 5.61, or liked slightly to liked
regularly.
There was significant difference (P < 0.05) among means attributed to taste and global acceptance only for sample 4. It probably
means that the panelists considered the taste as the most important
attribute, so the means were similar.
Texture obtained superior significant means (P < 0.05) if compared to the other attributes for all treatments. This result agrees
with the responses given by the panelists. Related to the ones liked
the most, 76% of them quoted texture as the most appreciated attribute. Reduction in pH caused by fermentation process can result
Table 2 --- Means values obtained with sensorial analysis:
comparison among attributes
Ice cream
types
Overall
Aroma Taste Texture acceptance
5.88c
6.00c
5.73b
5.15c
5.44c
5.47c
6.48b
6.58b
5.72b
5.21c
5.74b
6.00b
7.14a
7.22a
5.83a
6.92a
6.30a
7.17a
a,b,c
6.53b
6.42b
5.71b
5.61b
5.68b
5.92b
Means within the same row with different letters are significantly different (P
< 0.05).
Scores are based on 9-point hedonic scale with 1 as dislike extremely and 9
as like extremely.
S494
Table 3 --- Valuation means obtained with sensorial analysis: comparison of main effect culture
Cultures
Aroma
Taste
Texture
Overall
acceptance
Traditional
B. longum
B. lactis
5.94a
5.44b
5.45b
6.53a
5.47b
5.87b
7.14a
6.38b
6.73a,b
6.47a
5.66b
5.80b
a,b
Means within the same column with different letters are significantly different
(P < 0.05).
in structural alterations of proteins, which probably influenced positively the development of a pleasant texture on the ice cream.
Aroma was the least acceptable attribute in 4 of the treatments.
Means varied from 6 to 5.15. This attribute could probably be improved with the addition of acerola aroma; many panelists commented that they did not notice the aroma of the fruit, although the
samples had been prepared with about 13% of acerola pulp in their
composition.
ANOVA test could verify, through statistic treatment of data obtained with sensorial analysis, that double interaction (pH culture)
and main effects analyzed, it only detected significant results (P <
0.05) for the main effect of culture, for all variables (aroma, taste,
texture, and global acceptance) and variable texture for pH (Table 3
and 4).
Table 3 shows that samples elaborated with the traditional culture
of yogurt were better accepted (P < 0.05) in terms of aroma, taste,
and global acceptance than those produced with probiotic cultures.
There were no differences among probiotic cultures. This is a very
important result and proves that is not easy to elaborate fermented
foods with probiotic cultures with the same sensorial acceptance of
those obtained with traditional culture of yogurt.
S. thermophilus and L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus produce as the
main metabolic only lactic acid while bifidobacterias are heterofermentatives, produce lactic and acetic acids besides formic and
succinic acids as secondary metabolic (Laroia and Martin 1990). Ice
creams elaborated with bifidobacteria probably had lower acceptance because of the presence of these metabolic. The presence of
acerola pulp in the ice creams was not able to mask the taste and
aroma given by produced metabolic. In addition, most consumers
are usually habituated to ingest dairy fermented products with sensorial characteristics of yogurt, it means, taste and aroma attributed
to metabolic produced by S. thermophilus and L. delbrueckii ssp.
bulgaricus. Otherwise, they tend to reject fermented products with
different characteristics.
Davidson and others (2000) reported that, in general, ice creams
fermented with probiotic cultures had presented less aroma and
taste of yogurt than those produced with traditional culture. The
characteristics of yogurt were favored by a lower pH. In this study,
the samples produced with traditional culture were not commented
by the panelists as the ones with characteristic aroma or taste of
yogurt although had been significantly better accepted.
The panelists did not report strange taste or aroma in the samples.
According to Hagen and Narvhus (1999), the results for sensorial
Table 4 --- Valuation means obtained with sensorial analysis: comparison of pH main effect
pH
Aroma
Taste
Texture
Overall
acceptance
4.5
5.0
5.54a
5.68a
5.93a
5.98a
7.11a
6.42b
5.98a
5.97a
a,b
Means within the same column with different letters are significantly different
(P < 0.05).
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
The provision of probiotic cultures from Danisco and Rhodia, Brazil.
This work was financially supported by Fundaca o de Amparo a`
Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) (Project 03/06993-0).
References
Akin MS. 2005. Effects of inulin and different sugar levels on viability of probiotic
bacteria and the physical and sensory characteristics of probiotic fermented icecream. Milchwissenschaft 60(3):297301.
Alamprese C, Foschino R, Rossi M, Pompei C, Svani L. 2002. Survival of Lactobacillus Johnsonii La1 and influence of its addition in retail-manufactured ice cream
produced with different sugar and fat concentrations. Int Dairy J 12:2018.
Andrade RSG, Diniz MCT, Neves EA, Nobrega JA. 2002. Determinaca o e distribuica o
de a cido ascorbico em tres frutos tropicais. Ecletica Qum 27:393401.
Christiansen PS, Edelsten D, Kristiansen JR, Nielsen EW. 1996. Some properties of ice
cream containing Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Milchwissenschaft 51(9):5024.
Davidson RH, Duncan SE, Hackney CR, Eigel WN, Boling JW. 2000. Probiotic culture
survival and implications in fermented frozen yogurt characteristics. J Dairy Sci
83(4):66673.
Davies R, Obafemi IA. 1985. Response of microorganisms to freeze-thaw stress. In:
Robinson RK. (ed.) Microbiology of frozen foods. London: Elsevier Applied Science
Publishers. p 83107.
Favaro-Trindade CS, Grosso CRF. 2002. Microencapsulation of L. acidophilus (La-05)
and B. lactis (Bb-12) and evaluation of their survival at the pH values of the stomach
and in bile. J Microencapsulation 19(4):48594.
Foschino R, Beretta C, Ottogalli G. 1992. Studio delle condizioni ottimali di congelamento e descongelamento di colture lattiche termofile. Lindustria del Latte 28:49
67.
Fuller R, 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bact 66:36578.
Hagen M, Narvhus JA. 1999. Production of ice cream containing probiotic bacteria.
Milchwissenschaft 54(5):2658.
Haynes IN, Playne MJ. 2002. Survival of probiotic cultures in low-fat ice-cream. Austr
J Dairy Tech 57(1):104.
Heenan CN, Adams MC, Hosken RW, Fleet GH. 2004. Survival and sensory acceptability of probiotic microorganisms in a nonfermented frozen vegetarian dessert.
Lebensmittel Wissenschaft Technol 37(4):4616.
Hekmat S, McMahon DJ. 1992. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum in ice cream for use as a probiotic food. J Dairy Sci 75(6):141522.
Laroia S, Martin JH. 1990. Bifidobacteria as possible dietary adjuncts in cultured dairy
products-a review. Cult Dairy Prod J 25:1822
Lee YK, Salminen S. 1995. The coming of age of probiotics. Trends Food Sci Technol
6:2414
Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllarinen P, Crittenden R, Mogensen G, Fonden R, Saarela M.
2002. Technological challenges for future probiotic foods. Inter Dairy J 12:17382.
Marino Neto L. 1986. Acerola, a cereja tropical. Sao Paulo: Nobel. p 89.
Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. 1999. Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton,
Fla.: CRC Press. p 387.
Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ. 1998. The health effects of cultured milk products with
viable and nonviable bacteria. Inter Dairy J 8:74958.
SAS. 2001. USERS GUIDE: basic and statistic. Cary, N.C.: SAS. 1. p 686.
Saxelin B, Grenov U, Svensson R, Fonden R, Reniero T, Mattila-Sandholm T. 1999. The
technology of probiotics. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:38792.
Smittle RB, Gilliland SE, Speck ML, Walter WM Jr. 1974. Relationship of cellular fatty
acid composition to survival of Lactobacillus bulgaricus in liquid nitrogen. Appl
Microbiol 27:73843.
Thunell RK, Sandine E, Bodyfelt FW. 1984. Frozen starters from internal pH control
grown cultures. J Dairy Sci 67:2436.
Yamashita F, Benassi MT, Tonzar AC, Moriya S, Fernandes JG. 2003. Produtos de
acerola: estudo da estabilidade de vitamina C. Cienc Tecnol Aliment 23(1):924.
S495
evaluation of ice creams produced with probiotic cultures were considered satisfactory because it was not noticed the presence of probiotic flavor in the samples.
Related to pH main effect, there was a significant effect only for
texture. Table 4 shows that pH 4.5 resulted in significantly superior
sensory acceptance (P < 0.05) for this attribute. The pH 4.5 is below
of the isoelectric point of casein, what probably provoked bigger alterations in the protein structures which resulted in a more pleasant
texture for the consumers.
The fermented acerola ice cream was very acceptable to consumers, with 64% of the panelists responding that they would be
interested in purchasing the product.