Professional Documents
Culture Documents
65
http://dx.doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2015.15.1.65
ISSN(Print): 1598-2092 / ISSN(Online): 2093-4718
JPE 15-1-7
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Jerusalem College of Engineering, Chennai, India
Abstract
Resonant converters are well suited for induction heating (IH) applications due to their advantages such as efficiency and power
density. The control systems of these appliances should provide smooth and wide power control with fewer losses. In this paper, a
simple phase locked loop (PLL) based variable duty cycle (VDC) pulse density modulation (PDM) power control scheme for use in
class-D inverters for IH loads is proposed. This VDC PDM control method provides a wide power control range. This control
scheme also achieves stable and efficient Zero-Voltage-Switching (ZVS) operation over a wide load range. Analysis and modeling
of an IH load is done to perform a time domain simulation. The design and output power analysis of a class-D inverter are done for
both the conventional pulse width modulation (PWM) and the proposed PLL based VDC PDM methods. The control principles of
the proposed method are described in detail. The validity of the proposed control scheme is verified through MATLAB simulations.
The PLL loop maintains operation closer to the resonant frequency irrespective of variations in the load parameters. The proposed
control scheme provides a linear output power variation to simplify the control logic. A prototype of the class-D inverter system is
implemented to validate the simulation results.
Key words: Class-D inverter, Induction heating, Phase locked loop, Pulse density modulation, Zero voltage switching
I.
INTRODUCTION
CorrespondingAuthor:booma_nagarajan@yahoo.com
Tel: +9144-22461404,Fax:+9144-22461904, Jerusalem College of Eng.
*
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Eng., Jerusalem College of Eng., India
2015 KIPE
66
67
0 = j S MI L 1 + (R 2 + j S L 2 ) I L 2
switching frequency. IL1 and VL1 are the current and voltage
in the work coil, respectively.
The load current IL2 can be obtained from (2) which is
given as:
- j S MI L 1
R 2 + j S L 2
(3)
S2 L22
L R 2 + S2 L 2 L1L 2 - M 2
+ jS 1 2
R 22 + S2 L22
(4)
R eq =
S2 M 2 R 2
R 22 + S2 L22
Leq = L1 -
S2 L 2 M 2
R 22 + S2 L22
R eq R 22 + S2 L22
R 2S2
(9)
K =
(10)
L1L 2
VL1 =
M2 =
(2)
where, S = 2 f S
IL 2 =
since:
(5)
(6)
K =
2
R eq
+ S2 L 1 - L eq
S2 L 1 L 1 - L eq
)2
(11)
68
0.637Vd
(20)
Vm =
p
The load current (Io) through the resonant tank circuit is
described by the following equation:
(21)
I 0 = I m Sin( s t - f)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. (a) Circuit configuration of class-D inverter. (b)
Equivalent circuit of class-D inverter.
= tan - 1 Q L n (22)
n
Where, the peak value of the output load current (Im) is:
V
2Vd Cosf
Im = m =
2
Zeq
1
(23)
p.R eq 1 + Q 2L n n
R eq 1 + Q L n n
n =
s
r
(13)
Leq
Cr
1
= r Leq
r C r
(14)
(15)
(16)
Zeq = R eq 1 + Q 2L n
(17)
Zeq = R eq
1
+ j s Leq sCr
2Vd2Cos 2f
2 R eq
Veff Cos 2 f
R eq
Pdesired = Po D PWM
Z0 =
(25)
(26)
2
Veff
Cos 2
Po
(28)
Leq =
Q L R eq
wr
69
(29)
(31)
(32)
(34)
(35)
(36)
diode losses.
70
T
lim i E = I m A
(39)
TPDM
In the PDM, the average output power (P) is obtained by
multiplying Vd and iE as, follows:
t
P=
1
TPDM
0 A
2
Vd i E (t )dt
p
TA
2
T + te - t - t
= Vd I M A
p
TPDM
i E (t ) = I m 1 - e t
i E (t ) = i 1 (TA )e
+ I e - t (0 t T )
A
t - TA
t
(TA
-
I = Im
1-e
-
(37)
TA
t
(38)
1-e
Im is the maximum current in full-power operation, and I is
the initial value of the envelope iE. If QL is infinite, the
amplitude of the resonant current is in proportion to the pulse
density.
T
2
Vd I m A
p
TPDM
(41)
(42)
t TPDM )
TPDM
t
TA
(40)
T
- A
2
t
e t - 1
t
+ Vd I m
1-e
p
TPDM TPDM
t
e
-1
If the total time TPDM of the PDM operation is much
smaller than the time constant (), the amplitude of the
resonant current is in proportion to the pulse density. As a
result, no fluctuation occurs in the amplitude of the resonant
current. Thus, the output power is in proportion to the square
of the pulse density, as given by:
T
2
Vd I m A
p
TPDM
D PDM =
TA
TPDM
(43)
71
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Fig. 8. (a) DPDM control signal for 100% DPDM. (b) Output voltage with 100% DPDM. (c) Zoomed view of the output voltage with 100%
DPDM. (d) Output current with 100% DPDM. (e) Zoomed view of the output current with 100% DPDM. (f) Output power with 100% DPDM.
Pdesired = Po D PDM
(44)
2Vd2 Cos 2f
D PDM
p2 R eq
(45)
72
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 9. (a) Control signal for 50% DPDM. (b) Output voltage with 50% DPDM. (c) Output current with 50% DPDM. (d) Output power with
50% DPDM.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Fig. 10. (a) Control signal for 10% DPDM. (b) Output voltage with 10% DPDM. (c) Zoomed view of output voltage with 10% DPDM. (d)
Output current with 10% DPDM. (e) Zoomed view of output current with 10% DPDM. (f) Average output power with 10% DPDM.
2. locked condition the Io and Vo signals have the same
73
(a)
(b)
Fig.11.(a) Switch voltage (Vs1) and switch current (is1) at 100% DPDM (b) Switch voltage (Vs1) and switch current (is1) at 10% DPDM.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 12. (a) Hardware layout of the prototype. (b) DPDM control signal(100%) and high frequency PWM pulses (0.5v/div,0.01s/div). (c)
Experimental output voltage at 100% DPDM (20V/div,0.05s/div). (d) Experimental output current at 100% DPDM (2A/div,1s/div).
TABLE I
SPECIFICATIONS OF CLASS-D INVERTER AND IH LOAD SYSTEM
Components
Symbol
Values
Power
P
100 W-500W
Switching
fs
25 kHz-32kHz
frequency
DC-link capacitor
Cf
200 e-6
Resistance
Req
5-7 ohms
Inductance
Leq
0.0397e-3-0.05 e-3H
Resonant
fr
20 kHz-27kHz
Frequency
PDM frequency
fPDM
25 Hz
Resonant
Cr
1.59 e-6F
Capacitor
74
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 13. Experimental results at 10% DPDM. (a) DPDM control signal and high frequency switching signal (1V/div, 0.01s/div) (b) PDM
gate signals to S1 and S2 (2V/div, 50s/div) (c) Output voltage at 10% DPDM (40V/div,50s/div) (d) Output current at 10% DPDM
(2A/div,25s)
75
(a)
(b)
(c)
(e)
(d)
Fig. 14. (a) Gate pulses to the switches S1and the output voltage (32kHz with DPDM of 50%) (5V/div,50V/div,100s/div). (b) Output
voltage of the inverter with 32kHz frequency (40V/div,100s/div). (c) Zoomed view of the output voltage shown in (20V/div,10s/div).
(d) Transient period for the rise in output voltage shown in (5V/div,1s/div). (e) Voltage across the switch S1 (Vs1) and Current through
the switch S1 (Is1) (20V/div,5A/div,10s/div).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 15. (a) Variation of output power for different values of DPDM. (b) Variation of inverter module losses for different values of input
power. (c) Variation of output power for different values of input power.
76
study analyzes the PLL based VDC PDM control for the
widely used half bridge inverter circuit. This paper compares
the conventional PLL based PWM and the PDM control logic
with respect to losses and output power. 2. In the hardware,
the DPDM control signal is generated by a PIC microcontroller.
The transient time taken by the control circuit to lock the
resonant frequency at start-up duration is less due to the use
of the microcontroller. When the locking time is less, the
switching losses are also less during the start-up duration.
The cost of the microcontroller is also less. 3. In the proposed
study, the PDM control circuit adjusts the output power by
varying the PDM duty cycle instead of by varying the PDM
switching frequency. i.e. The time period of the low
frequency signal (TPDM) is not varied. This avoids the
problems due to acoustic noise.
V. CONCLUSIONS
This paper presented a PLL based VDC PDM power
control scheme in a class-D inverter for an IH load. The
design and analysis of the inverter for IH applications are
presented. The principle of the proposed control scheme for
power control is also discussed in detail. The performance of
the proposed control scheme is verified through simulation
results. Experimental verification of the VDC PDM scheme
is also done with a prototype module. From the simulation
and experimental results it can be concluded that the control
scheme has the following advantages: a simple configuration,
a wide load power control range, reduced switching losses
and high efficiency when compared to the conventional
PWM scheme. The ZVS operating condition is guaranteed in
the load range of 10% to 100%. It has been observed that
with a DPDM below 10%, the load current is pulsating and
causes the NON-ZVS condition.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Acero, J. M. Burdo, L. A. Barragan, D. N. avarro, R.
Alonso, J. R. Garcia, F. Monterde, P. Hernandez, S.
Llorente, and I. Garde, The domestic induction heating
appliance: An overview of recent research, in Proc. Appl.
Power Electron. Conf. Expo., pp. 651-657, 2008.
[2] A. Fujita, H. Sadakata, I. Hirota, H. Omori, and M.
Nakaoka, Latest developments of high-frequency series
load resonant inverter type built-in cooktops for induction
heated all metallic appliances, in IEEE Power Electron.
Motion Control Conf., pp. 2537-2544, 2009.
[3] I. Millan, J. M. Burdo, J. Acero, O. Luca, and S.
Llorente, Series resonant inverter with selective harmonic
operation applied to all-metal domestic induction heating,
IET Power Electron., Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 587-592, May 2011.
[4] B. K. Lee, J. W. Jung, B. S. Suh, and D. S. Hyun, A new
half-bridge inverter topology with active auxiliary resonant
circuit using insulated gate bipolar transistors for induction
heating appliances, in Proc. IEEE Power Electron. Spec.
Conf., Vol. 2, pp. 1232-1237, 1999.
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
77