Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q1
CbC reporting is applicable on MNE groups with annual consolidated group revenue of 750 million or more in the preceding fiscal year. From India perspective,
wherein consolidated revenue for the period ending FY 2015-16 was near to Rs.5400 crore (need to wait for clarification from GOI for exact number), parent
entity of such international group must file CbC report.
As it is applicable from FY 2016-17, first compliance deadline for Indian parent companies would going to be 30th November 2017.
Q.2
BEPS Action 13 also talks about three tier transfer pricing documentation, what is three tier transfer pricing documentation?
OECD realised that Guidelines issued in 1995 were not sufficient to address transfer pricing documentation requirement by tax authorities. And thus through
three tier transfer pricing documentation, the objective is to give more relevant and robust information in the hands of tax authorities.
So, now in addition to transactional report (referred as local file) in Action 13, taxpayer is also required to maintain master file and CbC report. First time, OECD
has given template of transfer pricing documentation and prescribes documents and information that should be maintained and submitted to the tax authorities.
It is important to understand that though there is threshold for CbC reporting, however no threshold has been prescribed for Master File by OECD.
Brief overview of three tier documentation is given below:
overview of the MNE group business, including the nature of its global business operations,
its global allocation of income and economic activity in order to assist tax administrations in evaluating the presence of significant transfer pricing
risk.
In general, the master file is intended to provide a high-level overview in order to place the MNE groups transfer pricing practices in their global economic,
legal, financial and tax context.
Local File: the local file provides more detailed information relating to specific intercompany transactions.
Country-by-Country Report: The CbC Report requires aggregate tax jurisdiction-wide information relating to the global allocation of the income, the taxes
paid, and certain indicators of the location of economic activity among tax jurisdictions in which the MNE group operates.
Page 2 of 13
Q.3
Can the OECD guidance on CbC reporting be used to interpret the Indian CbC reporting legislation?
In general, being India is signatory to BEPS implementation package, OECD guidelines can be followed. However, where there is a conflict, the Indian CbC
reporting legislation i.e. S.286 of the Act and related rules takes precedence.
Q.4
An Indian tax resident parent entity of an MNE Group [S.286(2) of the Act], or,
An Indian tax resident alternative reporting entity of an MNE Group [S.286(2) of the Act], or
Q.5
Page 3 of 13
Q.6
Which entity is the parent entity for the purpose of compliance under S.286 of the Act?
As per S.286(9)(h), the term Parent Entity means a Constituent Entity of an MNE Group that meets the following criteria:
(i) it owns directly or indirectly a sufficient interest in one or more other Constituent Entities of such MNE Group such that it is required to prepare Consolidated
Financial Statements under any law in force or accounting standards generally applied in its jurisdiction of tax residence, or would be so required if its equity
shares were listed on a stock exchange, and
(ii) there is no other constituent entity of such group which, due to ownership of any interest, directly or indirectly, in the first mentioned constituent entity, is
required to prepare a consolidated financial statement, under the circumstances referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii), that includes the separate financial
statement of the first mentioned constituent entity;
Thus what needs to be seen effectively is the ultimate parent entity.
Q.7
S.286 of the Act does not envisage a situation under which an entity can be appointed as an alternate reporting entity. However, perusal of Model legislation
related to Country by Country Reporting which is part of Action 13, we understand that the entity which is refereed as alternate reporting entity in S.286 is
indeed a surrogate parent entity as per Action 13.
Page 4 of 13
Para 7 of Article 1 of the Model legislation related to Country by Country Reporting, the term Surrogate Parent Entity means constituent entity of the MNE
Group that has been appointed by such MNE Group, as a sole substitute for the ultimate parent entity, to file the Country-by-Country report in that constituent
entitys jurisdiction of tax residence, on behalf of such MNE Group
Further, conditions under-which ultimate parent entity can appoint surrogate parent entity are also enumerated, same are highlighted below:
a) the ultimate parent entity of the MNE Group is not obligated to file a Country-by-Country report in its jurisdiction of tax residence; or,
b) the jurisdiction in which the ultimate parent entity is resident for tax purposes does not have a qualifying competent authority agreement in effect with India
that provides for the exchange of CbC Report; or,
c) there has been a systemic failure of the jurisdiction of tax residence of the ultimate parent entity and the same has been notified to the local constituent entity
by the ITA.
Q.8
constituent entity?
As per S,286(9) (d) constituent entity means,
(i) any separate entity of an international group that is included in the consolidated financial statement of the said group for financial reporting purposes, or may
be so included for the said purpose, if the equity share of any entity of the international group were to be listed on a stock exchange;
(ii) any such entity that is excluded from the consolidated financial statement of the international group solely on the basis of size or materiality; or
(iii) any permanent establishment of any separate business entity of the international group included in clause (i) or clause (ii), if such business unit prepares a
separate financial statement for such permanent establishment for financial reporting, regulatory, tax reporting or internal management control purposes;
Q.9
Responsibility
Page 5 of 13
S.No
Responsibility
Also, CbC report on or before due date.
(a) with which India does not have an agreement providing for exchange of the report
of the
nature referred to in sub-section (2); or
(b) there has been a systemic failure of the country or territory and the said failure
has been
intimated by the prescribed authority to such constituent entity:
4
Q.10.
As per the template given in Action 13, what information should a CbC Report contain?
A CbC report for an MNE Group must contain the following information in respect each jurisdiction in which the MNE Group operates:
(a) on an aggregate basis,
amount of unrelated party revenue, related party revenue and total revenue;
Page 6 of 13
(b) identification of each constituent entity carrying on a business or tax resident in each jurisdiction and, where different from such jurisdiction of tax residence,
the jurisdiction under the laws of which such constituent entity is organised, and the
For template, please refer Annexure 1A & 1B
Brief note on few of items required to be reported is given below:
S.No
1
Item
Key points
Tax Jurisdiction
The Reporting MNE should list all of the tax jurisdictions in which constituent entities of the MNE group are resident for tax
purposes.
A tax jurisdiction is defined as a State as well as a non-State jurisdiction which has fiscal autonomy. A separate line should be
included for all constituent entities in the MNE group deemed by the Reporting MNE not to be resident in any tax jurisdiction for
tax purposes.
Revenue
Revenues should include revenues from sales of inventory and properties, services, royalties, interest, premiums and any other
amounts.
Revenues should exclude payments received from other constituent entities that are treated as dividends in the payers tax
jurisdiction.
Profit
before
Tax
(Loss)
Income
The profit (loss) before income tax should include all extraordinary income and expense items.
Taxes paid should include cash taxes paid by the constituent entity to the residence tax jurisdiction and to all other tax jurisdictions.
Taxes paid should include withholding taxes paid by other entities (associated enterprises and independent enterprises) with
Page 7 of 13
S.No
Item
Key points
respect to payments to the Constituent Entity.
Thus, if company A resident in tax jurisdiction A earns interest in tax jurisdiction B, the tax withheld in tax jurisdiction B should be
reported by company A.
Number
Employees
of
The Reporting MNE should report the total number of employees on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis of all the constituent entities
resident for tax purposes in the relevant tax jurisdiction. The number of employees may be reported as of the year-end, on the
basis of average employment levels for the year, or on any other basis consistently applied across tax jurisdictions and from year to
year. For this purpose, independent contractors participating in the ordinary operating activities of the constituent entity may be
reported as employees. Reasonable rounding or approximation of the number of employees is permissible, providing that such
rounding or approximation does not materially distort the relative distribution of employees across the various tax jurisdictions.
Consistent approaches should be applied from year to year and across entities.
Q.11
Page 8 of 13
Q.12
Q.13
What are the penalties under the Act related to non compliance of CbCR and Master File?
S.No
Section
Non-compliance
Penalty
271AA(2)
Rs.500,000
271GB
Q.14
271 GB
Rs.500,000
How will ITA obtain CbC reports for Indian subsidiaries / permanent establishment of an MNE Group where the reporting entity is not tax resident in India?
Where the reporting entity is not a tax resident in India, ITA will receive the CbC report from the competent authority in the jurisdiction in which the reporting
entity is tax resident under automatic exchange of information provisions.
Page 9 of 13
Q.15
Will ITA going to share CbC reports filed in India with tax authorities of other jurisdiction or territory?
ITA will share CbC report, if asked for, under automatic exchange information agreement with qualifying competent authority.
Q.16
Further, it also clarifies that the information in the CbC report should not be used as a substitute for a detailed transfer pricing analysis of individual transactions
and prices based on a full functional analysis and a full comparability analysis. The information in the Country-by-Country report on its own does not constitute
conclusive evidence that transfer prices are or are not appropriate. It should not be used by tax administrations to propose transfer pricing adjustments based on
a global formulary apportionment of income.
Q.17
What are the provisions to protect confidentiality of the data shared via CbCR/ Master File?
Under Action 13, OECD has very clearly directed various Revenue Authorities to protect the confidentiality of the data shared via CbCR and Master File. Specific
provision with regard to Confidentiality and Data Safeguard also forms part of Tax Information Exchange Agreements, Multilateral Competent Authority
Agreement and other similar agreements.
It is to be appreciated that in April 2015, CBDT has formed Information Security Committee which is headed by Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). As per
Annexure B of CISO Instruction No.1 [F.No.500/62/2015-FTTR-III] dated 10th July 2015, information, unauthorized disclosure of which could be expected to cause
damage to the security of the organization or could be prejudicial to the interest of the organization, or could affect the organization in its functioning would be
classified as confidential, further as per example treaty exchanged information should be classified as confidential.
In CISO Instruction No.1, CBDT recognize that the tax administration is obliged to keep the information submitted by the taxpayers, including their sensitive
financial and personal information, confidential and is required to take steps to ensure that they are not disclosed inappropriately, either intentionally or by
accident.
Page 10 of 13
However, as the information shared will travel across the globe and will go in the hands of different government, it is quite tough to rule out possibility of
information getting leaked at some point. Further, incidents like Panama Papers and growing scrutiny by social activists, news reporter etc second the concern of
business community and tax consultants.
Disclaimer
This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting
advice. You should consult your tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in the subject topic.
Page 11 of 13
Annexure 1A: Model template for the Country-by-Country Report: Overview of allocation on income, taxes and business activities by tax jurisdiction
Name of the MNE Group:
Fiscal year concerned:
Currency Used:
Tax
Jurisdiction
Revenues
Unrelated Party
Related Party
Total
Profit(Loss)
before Income
Tax
Income Tax
Pid (on cash
basis)
Income
Tax
AccruedCurrent Year
Stated
Capital
Accumulated
Earnings
Number of
Employees
Page 12 of 13
Annexure 1B: Model template for the Country-by-Country Report: List of all the Constituent Entities of the MNE group included in each aggregation as per tax
jurisdiction
Tax
Jurisdiction
Constituent
Entities Resident
in the Tax
Jurisdiction
Tax Jurisdiction of
Organization or
incorporation if
different from Tax
Jurisdiction of
Residence
Research
and
development
Holding or
Managing
Intellectual
Property
Purchasing
or
Procurement
Manufacturing
or Production
Sales,
Marketing or
Distribution
Administrative,
Management or
Support Services
Provision
of
services
to
Unrelated
parties
Internal
group
Finance
Regulated
Financial
Services
Insurance
Holding
shares or
other equity
instruments
Dormant
1
2
3
1
2
3
Page 13 of 13
Other