Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Friday, all eyes will be on Rio de Janeiro as it hosts the 2016 Summer Olympic Games. While everyone will be
watching and rooting for the athletes from their countries to win gold, few will realize that the ones really losing out are
residents of Rio from low-income and working class communities. (/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/2016-olympicgames-what-rio-doesn-t-want-the-world-to-see/)
This is because the development model for major international sporting eventslike the Olympics and the World Cup as
SIGNUP
FORcities
E-MAIL
UPDATES
well as countless national sporting leagues like the NFLrarely benets all residents
of the
where
the games are
held. For example, even though the city of Rio promoted (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/sports/olympics/as-theFirst name
Lastthe
name
olympics-near-brazil-and-rio-let-the-bad-times-roll.html?_r=2) the Olympics to residents
by arguing that hosting
games would increase tourism and lead to major urban infrastructure improvements, the likely result will be billons in
losses (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/magazine/does-hosting-the-olympics-actually-pay-o.html?_r=1). In fact,
E-mail
thousands of low-income Brazilians have already been displaced
(http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2014/02/27/276514012/as-brazil-gears-up-for-olympics-some-poor-families-getMore Subscription Options (/e-mail-updates/)
moved-out) in order to build infrastructure for the games that will largely only benet wealthy communities. In addition,
several contracting companies for the Olympics now face corruption allegations (http://www.reuters.com/article/usSUBMIT
DON' T SHOW THIS AGAIN
olympics-rio-corruption-exclusive-idUSKCN0YG2WT). What was seen as an opportunity to democratize development in
Rio has instead become an opportunity for city ocials to justify actions that would otherwise never be tolerated
(http://www.vox.com/2016/6/27/12026098/rio-olympics-2016-removals-eviction)like human rights abuses, forced
evictions, and hiding poor people and neighborhoods away from view.
These challenges are not unique to Rio or the Olympics. During the preparations for the 2010 World Cup in South Africa,
FIFAthe governing body for international soccerdiscouraged (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/25/opinion/molefesouth-africas-world-cup-illusions.html) local authorities from upgrading an existing soccer stadium in a working-class
neighborhood of Cape Town. The local government had wanted to modernize this stadium and invest in infrastructure in
its surrounding neighborhood because it would help reduce inequality in the city. Instead, FIFA forcibly urged and got
local authorities to agree to build a new World Cup stadium in a wealthier section of the city. In Cleveland, owners of the
Quicken Loans Arenahome of the NBAs Cavaliersrequested a 50/50 public-private funding split for the arenas
construction amid critical nancing concerns for the healthcare system, justice system, and other government agencies
in the country surrounding Cleveland. And across the United States, the Federal Communications Commissions Nixon
Rule (http://www.sportsfans.org/agenda) allows NFL franchise owners to black out games from being locally televised if
high-priced tickets do not sell out even though the stadiums where these football games are played are oen built with
taxpayer money. As a result, it can sometimes be nearly impossible for city residents to watch their home teams play in
person or on TV.
Public spending for large sporting events is oen justied through an economic development model that says investing
in the infrastructure, marketing, and preparations for these events will benet everyone. But time and time again we see
that with large sporting events, only a select fewusually wealthier and more privileged members of the community
benet at the expense of everyone else.
Cities and communities do not have to displace their working class residents to build sports stadiums and venues. They
dont have to funnel public funding away from public goods or only build infrastructure in wealthy areas in the name of
economic development. Instead, cities can adopt an equitable development model for urban planning, which ensures
that all city residents have a chance to benet from major sporting events.
What would such an approach look like? For starters, there should be a push for the Olympics and other major sporting
event bids to more centrally take into consideration the impact of these events on low-income communities and the
general public. These international bodies should allow and empower civil society groups to comment on Olympic
development plans at an early stage. It is important to note that major sporting event planning and the Olympic bidding
process oen start years before construction even occurs (http://www.citylab.com/politics/2012/07/why-hosting-olympicsbad-cities/2689/). So in theory there should be plenty of opportunities to engage with civil society and broader
communities on proposed development plans. However, the Olympics has a compressed and frenzied bidding process
SIGNUP
FORto
E-MAIL
UPDATES
that prevents broad citizen involvement and long-term planning. And once a bid is
awarded
a host
city, planners rarely
SUBMIT
(https://www.theguardian.com/cities/davehillblog/2015/jul/23/london-olympic-legacy-three-years-on-2012-games) post-
Olympics. And while the London Olympic Planning Committee had good intentions, the results have been quite uneven.
In hosting the 1992 Olympic Games, the city of Barcelona leveraged the opportunity to develop a comprehensive urban
renewal plan (http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/dec/08/athletics.olympics2012) that helped create new jobs and
transform the citys deteriorating infrastructure by building a new airport and telecommunications network and
improving the sewage system.
What can philanthropy do to ensure to equitable development models for major large sporting events and arenas benet
everyone? Here are some possible courses of action:
Major sporting events can ignite a citys spirit and civic capacity, can lead to a sense of citywide pride, and can certainly
help to increase tourism and economic stimulus. But major sporting events and projects only benet everyone when they
are deliberately designed to do so. If we change the approach to development, large sporting events like the Olympics can
reduce, rather than drive, inequality.
Topics
1Comment
FordFoundation
Recommend 2
Share
Login
SortbyBest
Jointhediscussion
RonMader10daysago
AddingalinkfromPlanetahttp://planeta.wikispaces.com/...
Reply Share
Subscribe d AddDisqustoyoursiteAddDisqusAdd
Privacy
2016 Olympic Games: What Rio doesnt want the world to see (/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/2016-olympic-gameswhat-rio-doesn-t-want-the-world-to-see/)
(/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/2016-olympic-games-what-rio-doesn-t-want-the-world-to-see/)
How can cities challenge inequality and foster inclusive growth (/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/how-can-citieschallenge-inequality-and-foster-inclusive-growth/)
(/ideas/equals-change-blog/posts/how-can-cities-challenge-inequality-and-foster-inclusive-growth/)
About us (/about-us/)
Careers (/careers/)
Library (/library/)
Home (/)
CONNECT
( h t t p s : / / t w i t t e r. c o m / F o r d F o u n d a t i o n )
( h t t p s : / / f a c e b o o k . c o m / p a g e s / F o r d F o u n d a t i o n / 1 3 2 7 3 2 1 6 0 1 0 4 1 6 3 ?
r f = 1 0 8 1 8 5 9 0 2 5 4 2 5 3 6 )
( h t t p : / / w w w. l i n k e d i n . c o m / c o m p a n y / f o r d f o u n d a t i o n / w h e r e - m a r k e t s l e a d - w i l l - j u s t i c e - f o l l o w )
( h t t p s : / / p l u s . g o o g l e . c o m / 1 0 9 4 8 8 3 1 8 2 2 6 5 9 5 6 4 7 6 3 9 / p o s t s )
( h t t p s : / / p l u s . g o o g l e . c o m / 1 0 9 4 8 8 3 1 8 2 2 6 5 9 5 6 4 7 6 3 9 / p o s t s )
CONTACT
Ford Foundation
320 East 43rd Street
New York, NY 10017
USA
(+1) 212-573-5000
First name
Last name
E-mail
Subscription options (/e-mail-updates/)
SUBMIT
(/terms-and-conditions-of-use/)
All our content may be republished or reused for free, except for most photographs, illustrations, and videos.
Privacy (/privacy/)