20160824-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To ATO & Others

Mr Malcolm Turnbull, Prime Minister
24-8-2016
Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
5
Cc:
10
C/o Erin Holland/Robert Ravanello, Deputy Commissioners of Taxation

P.O. Box 327, Albury NSW2640
Your Reference7104179459143/8010436144588
Re 20160724-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ATO & others
15
20
Sir,
In my previous 24-7-2016 correspondence to the ATO (forwarded via your office) I ou8tlined
that the ATO purports to make a claim as to a fine. I now received a correspondence (reproduced
below) dated 17 August 2016 which purports that the ATO claims I have a Tax Debt
purportedly being the fines, and that it can and will pursue 9.01% yearly interest compounding
daily. Further that it can garnish monies from any bank account, hire a collection agency or take
legal action. Now let me get this right, I am a senior citizen and well do not have any income and
expenses that requires me to declare income.
As I quoted in my 24-7-2016 correspondence:
QUOTE 24-7-2016 CORRESPONDENCE
25
30
35
40
45
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Australian Taxation Office
19-11-2009
C/o James OHalloran, Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Fax 1800 060 063
.
Re; your correspondence TPALS/PAR
Ref number 325681885 (ex 5843700)
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
.
COMPLAINT
.
Sir,
I received a reminder dated 13 November 2009 purporting to be a reminder about an alleged
overdue tax return and before going further lets first refer back to my 25-3-2008 correspondence;
.
QUOTE 25-3-2008 CORRESPONDENCE
Further to previous correspondence and your 18 March 2008 correspondence (Paul A. Conde B. Com. LL.B.
(Hons) CPA FTIA I wish to respond as follows, albeit not set out in any order of importance, and while you
indicated to prefer not to be provided with additional material, on the other hand your refusal to ensure that I
am getting a refund of all unconstitutional charges caused for me to be paid (including GST) you leave me no
alternative but to provide further correspondence. As much as the ATO would pursue me if I had underpaid
any taxes I am entitled to pursue that unconstitutional collected taxes are refunded. Obviously, as much as the
ATO would apply cost, I view, the same ought to apply visa versa and I should be entitled therefore on
interest calculations for the period of refunds being delayed to me, etc.
.
I noticed that the Committee was not at all concerned as to the supply element (OMeara v FC of T [2003]
FCA 217) but rather to what should or should not be GST free.
.
p1 24-8-2016
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: See also Blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
10
15
The error seem to be made is, for example, that religious services should be free for being religious services
and this I view is in breach of Section 116 of the (federal) Constitution.
.
The issue is that what a religion is, and who should pay certain taxes are two different things.
.
Exclusion of paying federal taxes (not being State taxes) because of being a certain religion is
unconstitutional. More over, the argument that is presented is not governing the supply of services but one
that religion should not be taxed.
There is a clear problem here that the Commonwealth purported to provide for the GST in return for the
Abolition of certain state taxes, ignoring that religious organisations who may have legitimate tax
exemption under State taxation legislative provisions cannot obtain the same under federal taxation
provisions, as set out below.
END QUOTE 25-3-2008 CORRESPONDENCE
.
Your notice always states: If you have not lodged you should do so immediately and pay the
amount owning.. In brief I do not owe any taxes, rather I am owned refunds!
END QUOTE 24-7-2016 CORRESPONDENCE
20
25
I will not quote the entire past correspondences but relies upon it nevertheless.
Albeit not set out in any order of importance, it should be understood that recently with an
alleged debt of an Infringement Notice the court did set aside the (ex parte) orders on appeal
and well the prosecutor spend allegedly in excess of $18,000.00 to pursue me and didnt get a
single cent for this. As I then submitted there can be no debt before conviction.
It seems however that the ATO has taken it upon itself to be prosecutor, judge and executor and
side step the judiciary. I consider this a violation of my constitutional rights.
As the Framers of the Constitution made clear:
Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
30
Mr. OCONNOR.-No, it would not; and, as an honorable member reminds me, there is a decision on the
point. All that is intended is that there shall be some process of law by which the parties accused must be
heard.
Mr. HIGGINS.-Both sides heard.
35
40
45
50
55
Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes; and the process of law within that principle may be [start page 689] anything
the state thinks fit. This provision simply assures that there shall be some form by which a person
accused will have an opportunity of stating his case before being deprived of his liberty. Is not that a
first principle in criminal law now? I cannot understand any one objecting to this proposal.
END QUOTE
Why employ an army of judicial officers if the ATO can do its own thing?
In my view this is a gross insult to the judiciary and in effect I view CONTEMPT OF COURT.
What effectively the ATO is claiming is that it can act without the legal system and do its own
thing, as such set itself up as a De facto administration of justice.
The legal doctrine of ex turpi causa non oritur action denies any remedy to a litigant
(including a prosecutor) who does not come to court with clean hands.
If your own action is very unlawful and very unethical, if you come to court with Dirty Hands
best not to question others legality, morality, and ethics!
It is clear that despite my past request the ATO failed to furnish to me any records it holds
regarding any GST I was caused to pay. As I understand it GST is the legal term for the Goods
and Services Tax. As the ATO is the responsible body to administrate tax matters then I hold I
am entitled to be provided with the relevant records the ATO deals with governing my person.
There can be no excuse the ATO not holding appropriate records as to the GST I was caused to
pay by purported legal provisions, as I indicated in past writings I was for example wrongly
charged the GST by Bunnings and the ATO refused to refund this subsequently claiming it
keeps no records, etc.
p2 24-8-2016
p3 24-8-2016
10
15
20
What the ATO in its 17-8-2016 correspondence is claiming that I have an overdue debt this
even so I am not aware of any decision by any court that determined any order payable by me.
As such, the ATO claims a debt not because of an actual court order but because it now decides
for itself there is a debt. Why indeed have a constitution with its embedded legal principles if the
ATO does its own thing blatantly disregarding legal principles embedded in the constitution?
As I referred to in previous correspondence regarding the Abbott case, about 20 years ago, there
the Child Support Agency went to court as to an alleged debt, only to admit afterwards that there
actually never was any debt but a presumption of debt.
It is my understanding that to file a false/misleading incomplete taxation return, regardless if no
return is needed, itself could be a criminal offence. As such, as long as the ATO continue to deny
me to be provided with precise details as to GST that it collected that I had been forced to pay
then there can be no issue of any failure by me to fill in any tax return. Because I do not control
the tax files of businesses I am unaware as to what, if any, of the GST I was forced to pay by
businesses actually was passed on to the ATO. Some businesses, as I understand it, if they are
below a certain threshold of net income they can keep the GST component, I am obviously
entitled to know which if any business was permitted to do so.
As I duly did set out what eventuated with Bunnings and that in error they charged me GST over
my refund, causing me to pay twice the GST, and where the ATO claims it keeps no records then
it means the GST I was double charged somehow is being held without the ATO (Australian
Taxation Office) having any record where it went.
QUOTE Hypothetical litigation:
25
30
35
40
HIS HONOUR: Yes

PROSECUTOR: Your Honour we appear for the ATO and the issue is Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka the Defendant
failed to provide a tax return, actually several.
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka: I am appearing under objection, safe to state that there is no jurisdiction nor any case to
answer.
HIS HONOUR; Mr Prosecutor, could you clarify if the Defendant was required to provide tax returns?
PROSECUTOR: There is a system of self-assessment and ample of people do not require to provide a tax return,
most welfare recipients and pensioners who do not have a superannuation income ordinary fall
below the taxable income threshold.
HIS HONOUR: It seems to me that the Defendant is a senior citizen and are you saying that he has a
superannuation income that brings him above the threshold?
PROSECUTOR: Not that we know of. We have no record he does.
HIS HONOUR: Has he any special business income that you are aware off?
PROSECUTOR: Not that we are aware of.
HIS HONOUR: I noticed from the material that you fined him and threatened to take action to cause the bank to pay
any monies to the ATO, can you inform the Court did you obtain a court order to garnish any
monies for this purpose?
PROSECUTOR: Not that I am aware of Your Honour. It is simply how the ATO conduct s it matters.
p4 24-8-2016
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
HIS HONOUR: Why is your client taking this matter to court if it already determined an alleged fine as a debt and
doesnt need any court orders to legally enforce this?
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour I am appearing for the ATO and do not set the rules.
HIS HONOUR: But the point is you are appearing before this court and you are staking a claim of a debt which as
far I understand it is an imaginary debt ,not a court ordered debt. Why then are you here if you
already decided the matter without the legal processes before the courts having first been
explored in the first place?
PROSECUTOR: This is how my client conducts matters.
HIS HONOUR: I understand from the material that the Defendant filed he requested way back in 2008 for the ATO
to furnish details as to the GST he was forced to pay to numerous businesses and so with
details, as he would require this to fill in any tax returns as to avoid filing a false/misleading tax
return. Has your client done so since 2008?
PROSECUTOR: I understand my client has not done so, as it holds no records.
HIS HONOUR: Are you telling me that the ATO being the Australian Taxation Commissioner is allowing
businesses to charge the Defendant, and millions of others, GST being a Goods and Service
Tax, but the ATO hasnt got any records and so no clue how much of this money actually
ended up in Consolidated Revenue Funds? If that is what you desire to put to me then I suggest
you better not because that would quite frankly be sheer and utter nonsense.
PROSECUTOR: What the ATO requires is to have the Defendant to file tax returns.
HIS HONOUR: I understand this part but then my question is so what if the Defendant does file the tax returns are
you then able to assess how much GST he paid to various businesses and if all this GST he was
charged was actually handed over to the ATO?
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour it is my understanding the ATO keeps no records of what the Defendant may have
paid in GST let alone if any business did in the end pass this on to the ATO, this is because if
they earn below a certain threshold turnover then they essentially keep the GST for themselves.
HIS HONOUR: As I understand it from the documentation the Defendant is claiming back any and all GST he was
forced to pay, on constitutional grounds that the GST is unconstitutional. I am aware of the
decision in OMeara v FC of T [2003] FCA 217 but the Defendant is well within his right to
challenge this, as he did, and if this court has to go through the motions of establishing this and
were to find that indeed the GST is unconstitutional, then how is this court going to assess the
amount of monies that is refundable to the Defendant as having been unconstitutionally
charged upon him.
PROSECUTOR: Actually the Defendant would have to reclaim the GST from the businesses he paid it to.
HIS HONOUR: Do you really try to tell me that the Defendant is to go to all those businesses and tries to get GST
refunded when to their knowledge they do so lawfully? Surely you would be aware that
unlikely the Defendant would get a single cent refunded. It is the ATOs job to administer
taxation matters and the defendant should not be at a financial loss merely because the ATO
fails to do its job. Surely you can understand this? Let me put it in a different context. If the
ATO decides for whatever reason that the Defendant failed to pay sufficient GST then will the
ATO then issue a notice for the Defendant to pay the amount it assesses is due and payable and
also will it then apply a levy/charge/fine in regard of this amount? And to whom would all
these monies be payable?
PROSECUTOR: It obviously would be payable to the ATO, because this is an ATO matter!
HIS HONOUR: By your own submissions you made known that the GST is payable to businesses, and the ATO has
no records that exist as to how much the Defendant paid to each business, if he overpaid or
under paid, if the business did pass on all or any if anything at all to the ATO of the GST he
paid and yet you claim that it is a ATO matter?
PROSECUTOR: The ATO is there to assess what if any tax is still due and payable.
HIS HONOUR: Obviously for the ATO to make an assessment it must have facts and not fanciful assume
something. I will adjourn this matter say for 1 month and then the ATO can furnish me with the
relevant details it has on record as to what taxation, including GST, it claims the Defendant
paid, and once I have this in front of me I then will consider if there is any need for the
Defendant to respond at all. Obviously if the ATO, your client, fails to furnish such details I
would be unable to order a refund of GST that the Defendant was to have paid, if his claim
about the GST being unconstitutional was to succeed. As such, I can then only make a mere
estimate what the Defendant may have paid on GST and may issue an order for exemplary
damages. I will read out to you a relevant part from the material filed by the Defendant.
http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/redirect.cgi?path=/uk/cases/UKHL/1964/1.html
ROOKES (A.P.) v. BARNARD and ors
QUOTE
Exemplary damages are essentially different from ordinary damages. The
object of damages in the usual sense of the term is to compensate. The
p5 24-8-2016
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
object of exemplary damages is to punish and deter. It may well be thought

that this confuses the civil and criminal functions of the law; and indeed,
so far as I know, the idea of exemplary damages is peculiary to English law.
There is not any decision of this House approving an award of exemplary
damages and your Lordships therefore have to consider whether it is open
to the House to remove an anomaly from the law of England.
END QUOTE
Quite frankly I am left wondering why on earth the ATO took the line of conduct the
Defendant complains about, and seems to take it upon itself to garnish any bank holdings, if it
decides to do so.
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour I understand that legislation provides for this!
HIS HONOUR: Why then did your client bother this court if it can be prosecutor, judge and executor? It seems to
me that your client better get a grip upon reality. Legislation cannot be enforced when
contested unless a court pronounces against it. As such, not your client but the Court is the
appropriate forum to decide such matters.
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour the original notice was about 3 fines totalling $1,700.00 and it would not have been a
debt if it was paid before 2 August 2016.
HIS HONOUR: You might like to dance some fancy footing but this is not some dance competition but a court of
law. Either it is a debt or not. If it was not a debt then why should the Defendant pay it? If it
was a debt by what authority of whatever court was such order issued?
PROSECUTOR: When Your Honour put it in this manner then I am unable to clarify this further, as I am not aware
any court order was previously issued in that regard!
HIS HONOUR: It seems to me that more than likely, albeit I could be assuming this wrongly and you can prove
otherwise, that the ATO will not likely file any proper records governing the GST paid by the
Defendant over the years. Yet, by this it has denied the Defendants request to do so since at
least 2008, as the Defendants material indicates. Then where the ATO claims to charge on a
daily compounding interest 9.01% on a yearly basis where the current rate of interest is well
below 2% then I find it appalling that your client pursues matters as such, and I can assure you
that were the ATO fail to furnish this court with appropriate records as requested by the
Defendant and now ordered by me, then not only may I issue orders for exemplary damages but
also may apply it with the 9.01% daily compounded yearly interest rate. And I may attach to
this a court order that monies be garnished from the Commonwealth of Australia bank account,
as what is good for the goose is good for the Gander. My concern is that ordinary citizens may
be overwhelmed by the ATO conduct which I view is a CONTEMPT OF COURT as it
undermines the judiciary. And I can assure you that if the ATO fails to provide me the ordered
material in regard of all taxation records of the defendant and a precise set out of all GST paid
by him and to whom and what, if any amount of monies were placed in the Consolidated
Revenue Funds then you better arrange for the Taxation Commissioner and the relevant
responsible Minister to appear before me.
PROSECUTOR: Your Honour I have just be advised by my instructing solicitor that the ATO wishes to withdraw
its application, I seek leave hereby to do so?
HIS HONOUR: Well I can obviously issue orders for exemplary damages if I were to grand your client leave to
withdraw, but I do not consider this is appropriate to allow the application to be withdrawn.
Here we have the Defendant pushed through years of harassment about tax returns just that this
person happens to stand his ground and is willing to take on the ATO as he is entitled to do.
My concern is the tactics employed by the ATO and so likely against thousands of others. It
would be a sheer waste of courts time if such matter repeatedly occupied the courts time, where
then the Defendants may lack the knowledge and the skill to stand their grounds, and therefore
I view that I must dismiss the application to withdraw, but take notice that this is an implied
admission by the ATO that it has no case against the Defendant. The Defendant ought to be
entitled as any other senior citizen to enjoy his remaining years in peace and tranquillity and
this the ATO clearly blatantly disregarded for many years. This court owns a duty to provided
justice and I made an oath to do so and intend to do so. The issue is not proper law enforcement
of any ATO powers to require tax returns, but I fail to see how it can demand a person to file
any tax return where it self fails to have proper records and the Defendant would be unaware
how much each and every business passed on the precise amount, if any at all, of the GST he
was forced to pay. Therefore, it appears to me the ATO request/demands were totally
unreasonable and compounded with this threat of fines, debt, debt collector and legal action I
view this demands an exemplary damage order in view that the ATO has implied it has no case.
My issue is that I must consider if taxpayers in general ought to bear the cost of any orders I
may make against the ATO or if I ought to issue orders against certain persons personally and
p6 24-8-2016
10
15
20
25
30
35
so shield the ordinary taxpayers of having to pay for the cost, where they very well also might
be subjected to such folly of the ATO.
As the Defendant submitted in his writings and I will quote this:
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one
step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of
the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the
righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for
any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
END QUOTE
PROSECUTOR: If it pleases Your Honour I would be available for this matter in 5 weeks from today, so I could
schedule for the hearing, in view that I am best aware of what Your Honour stated.
HIS HONOUR: Mr Prosecutor, I accept this submission as I too consider it better if you stay on this matter. And
now directing myself to the Defendant, I have not sought your input further because I read your
written submissions and appalled that the ATO went about, as it did. If you have no issue with
the matter to be adjourned for 5 weeks as submitted by the Prosecutor then I will order this.
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka: I have no objection to this, and intend to be available on that date. I have boxes of receipts
but the way they are they are fainting and so many no longer can be read as to the GST that was
charged. Obviously, not every trader provides receipts, even so they charge GST,, such as at
Sunday Markets, and I did write to the then Treasurer Mr Peter Costello about this but more
than a decade later nothing was done about this, even so items are sold at
Sunday Markets at a similar or higher price with GST included.
HIS HONOUR: I do not think we need to decipher each and every receipt, as I will be able to issue orders
regardless of what precise amount of GST you may or may not have paid, and what may or
may not have been paid into Consolidated Revenue Funds, as I became aware of your written
submission regarding exemplary damages, and I view that will be sufficient to ensure you will
have a proper compensation, considering that the Prosecutor implied it had no case against you
when seeking to withdraw the case. As such, you can leave your documentation at home. What
my main issue will be is that if the ATO fails to furnish this court with the relevant details then
not only shows it that it had no case against you but may have acted maliciously. I therefore
require the Taxation Commissioner and the responsible Minister to attend at the next hearing,
and I will issue a court order for this, as to determine in what manner any order for exemplary
damage will be issued. I view this is a matter that requires to be a deterrent to any public
official to unreasonably use and misuse powers against citizens.
END QUOTE Hypothetical litigation:
40
I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT ANY CONDUCT BY THE ATO TO INTERFERE WITH
ANY PROPERTY I OWN AND/OR ANY MONIES THAT MIGHT BE HELD BY
WHOMEVER FOR ME OR OTHERWISE CAUSESINTIMIDATION/PROBLEMS
WILL BE VIGOROUSLY OPPOSED, AND COMPENSATION PURSUED.
p7 24-8-2016
10
15
It appears that a business search shows no such business identity as TAX OFFICE PAYMENTS
to be registered. Neither being any registered trading names of the ATO. As such, any trading
account of TAX OFFICE PAYMENTS cannot be any legitimate Australian Taxation Office
business trading account.
With Mr John Murray Abbott he ended up being ordered by the Court to pay an estimated
$227,000.00 regarding an alleged GE debt, but 10 years on GE finally admitted, as Mr John
Murray Abbott always claimed he had no such debt to GE, nor had any previously. As such
crooks deceived the courts.
One obviously has to ask:
WHAT KIND OF SCAM IS THE ATO INVOLVED IN, AND IS THIS SOME KIND
OF BLATANT RIP OFF OF TAXPAYERS MONIES BEING FUNNELED INTO
SOME ILLEGAL ACCOUNT THAT IS NOT NOR CAN BE A LEGITIMATE ATO
TRADING ACCOUNT?
.
http://www.abr.business.gov.au/SearchByAbn.aspx?abn=51824753556
QUOTE
ABN details help
Entity name:
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION
OFFICE
ABN status:
Active from 01 Nov 1999
Entity type:
Commonwealth Government Entity
Goods & Services Tax (GST):
Registered from 01 Jul 2000
Main business location:
NSW 2640
Trading name(s) help

Trading name
From
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE
09 Mar 2000
p8 24-8-2016
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE-SUPERANNUATION

GROUP
19 May 2000
Deductible gift recipient status help

Not entitled to receive tax deductible gifts
ABN last updated: 17 Jun 2009
Record extracted: 23 Aug 2016

Disclaimer
The Registrar makes every reasonable effort to maintain current and accurate information on this site. The
Commissioner of Taxation advises that if you use ABN Lookup for information about another entity for
taxation purposes and that information turns out to be incorrect, in certain circumstances you will be
protected from liability. For more information see disclaimer.
END QUOTE
10
QUOTE
Top tips to avoid being a victim of phishing emails
15
1. Beware of unsolicited requests for sensitive information dont click on embedded

links in emails or websites you dont know or trust.
2. If you get an email from someone you do know and it asks you to click on a link but
the way the email is written isnt their normal email style, call or text them and ask if
it really is them sending the email.
20
3. If in doubt, visit trusted websites by typing the internet address (URL) directly into
the browser address bar, rather than clicking on a link embedded in an email.
p9 24-8-2016
4. Never respond to requests for personal information in an unexpected email or pop-up

window.
5. If in doubt, always contact the company that claims to be the sender of the email or
pop-up window, using their official contact details.
6. Make sure all your devices are protected with regularly updated anti-virus software
and regularly update the operating system software.
7. Use a spam filter to help block unsolicited and unwanted email.
10
For more information on protecting yourself from scams:

www.consumer.vic.gov.au/resources-and-education/scams and
www.telstra.com.au/cybersafety. You may also be interested in taking up learning
opportunities available in the Victorian Tech Savvy Seniors program.
This article was produced by Telstra for inclusion on Seniors Online.
https://www.seniorsonline.vic.gov.au/news-opinions/latestnews/Think%20before%20you%20click%20-%20beware%20of%20phishing
15
END QUOTE
http://www.abr.business.gov.au/SearchByName.aspx?SearchText=tax+office
QUOTE
20
Your search for tax office found 884 matches. The top 200 current names with active ABNs are listed below sorted by relevance.
Use All ABNs tab to list cancelled ABNs/names. Click on an ABN or refine your search.
Matching names
ABN
Name
Type
Location
73 027 083
723
Active
The Taxation Office
Business
Name
3171 VIC
51 824 753
556
Active
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE
Entity Name
2640
NSW
89 092 954
151
Active
MY TAX OFFICE
Business
Name
4127 QLD
78 086 226
867
Active
My Tax Office
Other Name
4127 QLD
57 257 235
372
Active
Property Tax Office
Business
Name
2220
NSW
73 380 359
TAX OFFICE SUPPORT
Trading Name
3079 VIC
p10 24-8-2016
364
Active
96 767 823
869
Active
tax deduction office
Business
Name
2035
NSW
13 621 949
036
Active
ATO KOCHIN
Entity Name
6110 WA
68 130 394
222
Active
MR TAX
Business
Name
3124 VIC
83 645 687
405
Active
TAX MD
Business
Name
4030 QLD
81 059 501
914
Active
TAX PTY LTD
Entity Name
2067
NSW
43 008 909
591
Active
TAXCORP PTY LTD
Entity Name
6014 WA
80 122 293
903
Active
Tax & Co Pty Ltd
Entity Name
3108 VIC
68 847 080
548
Active
The Trustee for Integra Tax Office Trust
Entity Name
6168 WA
76 477 471
509
Active
ALBURY TAX OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB
Trading Name
2640
NSW
77 493 152
110
Active
ATO TILING SERVICES
Trading Name
5069 SA
51 824 753
556
Active
AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE-SUPERANNUATION GROUP
Other Name
2640
NSW
68 095 591
951
Active
CHERMIDE TAXATION OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB
Trading Name
4032 QLD
42 536 399
CHIAKI & TERUMI ATO
Entity Name
4217 QLD
p11 24-8-2016
272
Active
47 088 588
613
Active
Corporate Taxation Services (Brisbane Office)
Business
Name
4122 QLD
89 589 669
619
Active
MARTIN AL-ATO
Entity Name
2165
NSW
33 159 437
911
Active
MCCARTHY ATO SERVICES PTY LTD
Entity Name
2113
NSW
38 010 448
914
Active
OBT ACCOUNTING & TAX - GATTON OFFICE
Business
Name
4343 QLD
53 446 983
832
Active
OBT ACCOUNTING & TAX - GATTON OFFICE
Other Name
4343 QLD
57 505 486
229
Active
PENRITH TAXATION OFFICE STAFF WELFAREFUND
Entity Name
2750
NSW
27 849 006
965
Active
SYDNEY TAXATION OFFICE STAFF WELFAREFUND
Entity Name
2000
NSW
28 897 407
159
Active
TONEE AL-ATO
Entity Name
2161
NSW
51 142 093
305
Active
The Trustee for WOLLONGONG TAX OFFICE UNIT TRUST
Entity Name
2084
NSW
30 453 312
237
Active
The trustee for ATO Super Fund
Entity Name
4000 QLD
51 248 702
319
Active
Office of the Inspector-General of Taxation
Other Name
2000
NSW
68 095 591
951
Active
CHERMSIDE TAXATION OFFICE SPORTS AND SOCIAL CLUB
Entity Name
4032 QLD
44 362 850
Dandenong Taxation Office Staff Welfare Fund Inc
Entity Name
3175 VIC
p12 24-8-2016
328
Active
20 236 478
469
Active
H ATO & Y YAMAGUCHI
Entity Name
4053 QLD
97 602 636
103
Active
MOONEE PONDS TAXATION OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB
Trading Name
3039 VIC
75 411 415
194
Active
The Trustee for ATO Gosford Unit Trust
Entity Name
2600 ACT
63 680 159
365
Active
The Trustee for Australian Taxation Office Necessitous Circumstances Fund
Entity Name
2601 ACT
99 134 228
717
Active
The trustee for ATO Mellor Super Fund
Entity Name
4169 QLD
13 082 704
890
Active
AUSTRALIA FINANCE AND TAX PLANNING BUREAU
Business
Name
4101 QLD
38 885 913
353
Active
ATO CALL CENTRE SOCIAL CLUB
Entity Name
2750
NSW
14 608 458
172
Active
ST LEONARDS ATO SOCIAL CLUB
Entity Name
2065
NSW
ABN
Name
Type
Location
62 934 115
383
Active
SWIFT TAX REFUNDS PO BOX 987
Trading Name
6104 WA
68 919 170
548
Active
The trustee for Dandenong Taxation Office Staff Welfare Fund Trust
Entity Name
3175 VIC
61 131 903
744
Active
MELJOPE PTY LTD ATO J G WITTIG FAMILY TRUST
Entity Name
2640
NSW
86 628 319
689
Active
RITZCORP DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD ATO RITZCORP SERVICES TRUST
Trading Name
3127 VIC
p13 24-8-2016
96 721 080
206
Active
WK PROPERTY PTY LTD ATO THE WHELAN PROPERTY TRUST
Trading Name
3051 VIC
26 911 278
303
Active
Bradson Lund Pty Ltd & Harrikate Pty Ltd ATO The Noel Lund Family Trust
Entity Name
4343 QLD
60 546 259
521
Active
COPLEY NOMINEES ATO PERISSA SU PERANNUATION FUND
Entity Name
3000 VIC
69 173 621
545
Active
D L B TAXATION & OFFICE SERVICES PTY LTD EMPLOYEES SUPER

FUND
Trading Name
2137
NSW
21 688 359
304
Active
TEXAS POST OFFICE
Trading Name
4660 QLD
61 861 270
658
Active
J & N VASEYJAPARA NAME RELINQUISHED 1983 ATO ADVISED
Trading Name
2428
NSW
99 322 887
103
Active
JOHN AND BROS SCRAP METAL & WRECKING SERVICES (ATO PARTS)
Trading Name
6109 WA
99 128 272
668
Active
TAAX Pty Ltd
Entity Name
4514 QLD
40 849 785
574
Active
TAXI
Trading Name
5035 SA
78 338 103
712
Active
TAXI
Trading Name
2131
NSW
35 423 195
476
Active
TAXI
Trading Name
5108 SA
55 957 718
287
Active
TAXI
Trading Name
2170
NSW
END QUOTE
There are endless (about 800) names with tax in it, including the word taxi, but none appears to
have the word payments in it.
5
p14 24-8-2016
10
15
20
Only a fool would make a payment to an unregistered claimed business account.

It must be clear that if the ATO genuinely had a request for payment it would have to be in a
registered business name bank account/Bpay and not some fancy name as we all might recall
how Julia Gillard was haunted as Prime Minister having established a fake account for payments
which was not at all one of the union but appeared to be so.
In my view there should be an investigation as to the legitimately of this claimed Bpay account
purportedly claimed to be that of the ATO, but may not be at all.
As with the GE versus Abbott case, it was authorised and conduct by a senior GE staff member
who had Power of Attorney of GE, but nevertheless was pursuing fake debts that GE allowed
him to pursue in GEs name, this even so they knew or ought to have known he was misusing his
Power of Attorney to illegally litigate as to scam debts. I suspect the same might now be with the
ATO.
It should be clear that scams are ongoing, and I just received an email allegedly a refund from
Telstra even so I have no paying Telstra account as such. Another email was a Vodafone offer
but the return address was not at all that of Vodafone, and on and on the scams are. At the very
least if the ATO was to send out genuine correspondence in whatever manner it should operate
on a legitimate business name account. Failing to do so is sufficient to regard the correspondence
as a scam.
In my view if this is a genuine correspondence of the ATO, which I doubt, then it should provide
a apology for the harassment, etc, upon me, and I view some compensation should be provided to
me for the ongoing harassment upon me.
25
I request that a copy of this correspondence is provided to the aTO and to the responsible
Minister.
Awaiting your response,
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
p15 24-8-2016

20160824-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To ATO & Others

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20160824-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To ATO & Others

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mr Malcolm Turnbull, Prime Minister

C/o Erin Holland/Robert Ravanello, Deputy Commissioners of Taxation

Re 20160724-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ATO & others

HIS HONOUR: Yes

object of exemplary damages is to punish and deter. It may well be thought

END QUOTE Hypothetical litigation:

ABN details help

Active from 01 Nov 1999

Commonwealth Government Entity

Goods & Services Tax (GST):

Registered from 01 Jul 2000

Main business location:

Trading name(s) help

AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE

AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE-SUPERANNUATION

Deductible gift recipient status help

ABN last updated: 17 Jun 2009

Record extracted: 23 Aug 2016

1. Beware of unsolicited requests for sensitive information dont click on embedded

4. Never respond to requests for personal information in an unexpected email or pop-up

and regularly update the operating system software.

7. Use a spam filter to help block unsolicited and unwanted email.

For more information on protecting yourself from scams:

The Taxation Office

AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE

Property Tax Office

TAX OFFICE SUPPORT

tax deduction office

TAX PTY LTD

TAXCORP PTY LTD

Tax & Co Pty Ltd

The Trustee for Integra Tax Office Trust

ALBURY TAX OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB

ATO TILING SERVICES

AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE-SUPERANNUATION GROUP

CHERMIDE TAXATION OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB

CHIAKI & TERUMI ATO

Corporate Taxation Services (Brisbane Office)

MCCARTHY ATO SERVICES PTY LTD

OBT ACCOUNTING & TAX - GATTON OFFICE

OBT ACCOUNTING & TAX - GATTON OFFICE

PENRITH TAXATION OFFICE STAFF WELFAREFUND

SYDNEY TAXATION OFFICE STAFF WELFAREFUND

The Trustee for WOLLONGONG TAX OFFICE UNIT TRUST

The trustee for ATO Super Fund

Office of the Inspector-General of Taxation

CHERMSIDE TAXATION OFFICE SPORTS AND SOCIAL CLUB

Dandenong Taxation Office Staff Welfare Fund Inc

H ATO & Y YAMAGUCHI

MOONEE PONDS TAXATION OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB

The Trustee for ATO Gosford Unit Trust

The Trustee for Australian Taxation Office Necessitous Circumstances Fund

The trustee for ATO Mellor Super Fund

AUSTRALIA FINANCE AND TAX PLANNING BUREAU

ATO CALL CENTRE SOCIAL CLUB

ST LEONARDS ATO SOCIAL CLUB

SWIFT TAX REFUNDS PO BOX 987

MELJOPE PTY LTD ATO J G WITTIG FAMILY TRUST

RITZCORP DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD ATO RITZCORP SERVICES TRUST

WK PROPERTY PTY LTD ATO THE WHELAN PROPERTY TRUST

COPLEY NOMINEES ATO PERISSA SU PERANNUATION FUND

D L B TAXATION & OFFICE SERVICES PTY LTD EMPLOYEES SUPER

TEXAS POST OFFICE