Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behnam Danai
Ontario Hydro
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1. INTRODUCTION
Generating station outputs and transmission interface flows
may be limited by a variety of factors including angular
stability, voltage stability, and/or transmission line thermal
considerations. With the maturation of mitigation techniques
and analysis tools for angular stability, voltage stability has
emerged as one of the primary concerns of power system
planners and operators.
Voltage stability is the ability of a power system to maintain
acceptable voltages at all buses in the system under normal
conditions, and after being subjected to a disturbance [l].
Unlike the mature field of angular stability, data required for
voltage stability studies may not be readily available. This is
because voltage stability is influenced by nonlinear timevariant controls (e.g. generator excitation limiters, under-load
tap-changing transformers) and load characteristics (e.g.
motors, thermostatically controlled loads), which change with
both voltage level and time.
Until recently, the level of attention devoted to generator and
PE-580-PWRS-0-01-1997 A paper recommended and approved
by the IEEE Power System Engineering Committee of the IEEE
Power Engineering Society for publication in the IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems. Manuscript submitted August 16, 1996; made
available for printing January 8, 1997.
11. LABORATORY
LOADTESTS
The loads selected for laboratory testing (Table I), represent
the largest fractions of residentiakommercial-/industrial
feeder loads including modern devices such as heat pumps,
computers, laser printers and microwave ovens. Large loads
such as three-phase industrial induction motors were not
tested because well-documented simulation models exist for
these motors [2,7].
The selected loads were subjected to large (-25 to -75%)
585
voltage changes in slow ramps, and in sudden steps. For
smaller loads, several devices were tested in parallel to
produce one composite load.
L1
120v
3
4
6
7
Battery charger
Compact fluorescents magnetic
electronic
Electronically-ballasted fluorescents
Fluorescent ballast dimmer
High intensity discharge (HID) lighting
1
2
9
10
11
12
13
1
1
52-108
48-111
[2]
2
2
76-103
96-110
75-111
67-100
5 [l]
61-109
28-109
8 U1
22 [l]
4 [l]
1 [l]
52-113
60-109
60-109
42-112
HeaterBlower [2]
42-100
58-108
I
I
Load 3
120 v
L2-
Load 2
20A
n
121
w
I '
Variac
t 10% v
Notes:
[I]
v (volts)
586
Some very high frequency "spikes" at the instant of switching
were observed in loads containing switching power supplies,
but these are not modelled here (details may be found in ref.
[SI). The static models listed in Tables I1 and 111 are
appropriate for both steady-state and dynamic studies for
voltages above the minimum voltage (Vmin, Table 11).
Exponential Model:
ZIP Model:
r
Ptotal = P o * [ Z p * [ ~ ]
Ip*[$]
Pp]
The ZIP models for the measured loads are shown in Table
11. The ZIP parameters were fitted to the measured data with
no constraints, except that the sum of all components is 1 per
unit. Both the least-squares error and the slope of the fitted
curve near rated voltage were preserved (aP/dV, aQ/aV, Table
11). Because these models have parameters which can be
greater than 1 per unit and/or less than zero, the models do
not look "normal", but should be possible to enter in all
commonly-used simulation programs. The ZIP coefficients for
reactive power are typically large because of the high load
power factors and high @/aV (e.g. loads 9b, 10). Exponential
load models are given in Table 111. Table 111 also lists some
miscellaneous factors concerning the loads and models. In
1.00
0.45
0.61
0.79
0.79
0.93
0.74
0.90
0.84
0.76
0.99
0.97
0.49
1.00
0.98
1.00
0.94
0.99
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.87
0.87
0.76
0.61
0.50
0.50
0.83
0.65
0.54
0.63
0.78
0.73
0.67
0.67
0.83
0.50
0.00
0.96
1.91
0.05
0.43
3.19
0.72
5.46
0.85
1.19
3.51
0.14
0.16
0.34
-2.48
-1.60
-0.16
-0.48
0.98
0.34
0.08
-2.78
0.98
1.00
0.05
-2.23
0.31
0.61
-3.84
-0.98
-14.21
-1.40
-0.26
-3.94
0.77
0.79
1.31
5.46
3.58
1.77
1.89
-0.03
-0.32
0.07
6.06
0.02
0.00
-0.01
1.33
0.63
-0.05
1.65
1.25
9.74
1.56
0.07
1.43
0.09
0.05
-0.65
-1.97
-0.98
-0.62
-0.41
0.06
0.98
0.85
-2.28
0.00
0.00
2
3a
3b
4a
4b
4c
5
6
7a
7b
7c
Sa
8b
9a
9b
10
1l a
1lb
12
13a
1
2
3
4
5
Reactive power ZIP coefficients adding to -1 indicate capacitive reactive power load charactenstics
Vmin represents the minimum voltage (in pu) for which the load model is valid (dropout voltage)
SO is the measured apparent power (VA) at rated voltage (not nameplate)
pf is the load power factor
aP/aV and dQ//aV are the measured slopes at rated voltage
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
Reactive Power
I
P
000
000
000
2
251
-056
-1 21
109
1478
-1485
22 92
059
580
-0 06
018
303
000
079
000
1221
29 84
000
000
000
069
000
-234
220
347
-0 18
-2372
3159
-40 39
065
-726
-034
-083
-289
000
-016
000
-1838
-4526
000
000
000
025
000
083
-065
-1 26
009
993
-1574
18 47
-024
246
-0 60
-035
086
000
036
000
7 16
1441
000
000
000
006
000
Exponent
mav aqav
1.96
1.58
0.42
1.48
2.54
0.47
-3.28
0.29
2.12
3.08
1.05
1.12
1.99
0.49
0.38
1.46
0.93
1.92
0.36
0.24
0.50
1.98
2.00
'
0.00
2.68
1.09
1.05
2.00
5.85
1.90
5.45
1.84
4.34
-0.46
-0.47
3.17
0.00
1.43
0.00
6.05
14.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.63
0.00
587
Load
la
lb
2
3a
3b
4a
4b
4c
5
6
7a
7b
7c
8a
8b
9a
9b
10
1l a
llb
12
13a
13b
Notes:
M.
I.
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.87
0.87
0.76
0.61
0.50
0.50
0.83
0.65
0.54
0.63
0.78
0.73
0.67
0.67
0.83
0.50
0.00
1
0.45
0.567
0.795
0.786
0.94
0.915
0.729
0.853
0.761
0.988
0.963
0.495
N/A
0.976
0.992
0.947
0.981
0.95
1
0.999
1
1
1.95
0.77
0.34
1.47
2.12
0.34
-3.34
0.33
2.11
2.59
0.95
1.03
2.07
N/A
0.89
1.64
1.0
1.90
0.24
0.20
0.83
1.98
2
0
0.892
0.744
0.627
0.625
0.376
0.831
0.35
0.558
0.650
-0.156
-0.247
0.892
0
0.179
N/A
0.333
-0.055
0
0
0.045
0.016
0
0
2.13
1.51
1.34
1.98
4.12
0.86
5.74
1.89
4.06
0.31
0.46
3.21
0
1.21
N/A
5.84
-4.25
0
0
24.17
1.42
0
Notes
I1
1
I1
1
I1
I1
I1
:
I1
1
I1
1
I1
1
I
1
I1
I
(
I
(
I C, h,
1
(
I
C
I
C
I C, h,
I
C
(
1
1
c
I
I
'I
1
1
11.
1.
2.
~zo?:Factor.
motors
Minimum voltage (pu) for which load model is valid
Ratio of SO (Table 11) to nameplate VA
47
29
23
6
63
18
29
38
90
11
35
42
39
4
26
26
40
34
588
ILoad Component
Refrigerator/Freezer
Office Equipment [note 31
Adj. Freq. Drive 2 - fans/pumps
25
10
5
10
20
10
40
30
5
Notes:
1. Lighting is split equally between the different fluorescent models.
2. Heating is split equally between the heater and heaterhlower.
3. Office equipment is split equally between Office 1 and 2 models.
1ow
800
11w
1200
1300
1400
3:Q
07~
06-----
0.5
-Base
Case
Contingency -Load
Char.
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
589
V. DISCUSSION,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
0.9
a,
-P
o.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
Figure VII: Voltage of Load Bus for AFD (Const. Torque) Load Model
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
590
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study documented in this report was prepared by and
sponsored jointly by Ontario Hydro and by the Canadian
Electricity Association [8]. We thank the reviewers, Mr. R.W.
Creighton of Nova Scotia Power Inc. and Mr. M. Klein of
Ontario Hydro for their technical guidance and timely
comments brought to the study. The contribution of the
respondents to the utility survey is gratefully acknowledged.
We thank the members of the IEEE Working Group on Load
Representation for Dynamic Performance Analysis for their
responses to the utility survey, their technical guidance, and
for enabling coordination of this work with other studies in
progress. Finally, we thank the CEA for permission to
publish this paper.
[ 11 Voltage
APPENDIXA. AGGREGATELOADMODEL
Using the information on the load composition of each zone
and the assumptions made on the load components for the
different load categories, the aggregate load model for each
zone was computed as described below. The results are shown
in Table VI.
First the percentage of individual load type is computed in
each zone by the following equation:
Yj
(Xaj
xbj
*B
Xcj
C) / 100.0
where
Y. = Percentage of load type "j" in the zone
= Percentage of load type "j" in the commercial load
aJ
category (Table V)
A = Percentage of commercial load in the zone (Table IV)
Xbj = Percentage of load type "j" in the industrial load
category (Table V)
B = Percentage of industrial load in the zone (Table IV)
X . = Percentage of load type "j" in the residential load
CJ
category (Table V)
C = Percentage of residential load in the zone (Table IV)
x"
591
APPENDIXB. FREQUENCY
DEPENDENCE
Frequency-dependence of active and reactive power is usually
represented in static models as
and similarly for Q [3],
P(V,f) = P(V)*(l + k,Af)
where Af = f - fo , frequency f =
ae ,
-
at
and 0 is the voltage phase angle at each bus.
- fitted model
measured
3501 I'
325
300'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'%
50
-50
-1 00
Load
Range pf
dP/dfJQ/dl
7a electronic compact fluorescent 1
92-105 -0.99 0.393 0.0
7b electronic compact fluorescent 2
92-105 -0.97 0.254 -3.35
7c conventional magnetic compact fluorescent 92-105 0.49 -1.60 -1.26
8a electronically ballasted fluorescent 1
90-108 1.00 0.218 0.0
8b electronically ballasted fluourescent 2
90-108 0.98 0.115 4.26
9a electronic dimming ballast
90-110 1.00
0.2 0.0
9b external fluorescent dimmer
90-110 0.94 0.924 -6.25
10 high pressure sodium lamps
90-110 -0.99 -1.31 0.0
95-105 1.00 -0.017 0.309
1la office equipment 1
Notes:
Power Factor (pf) shown negative for loads with capacitive reactive power
Range is the measurement range in % frequency
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
Frequency (Hz)
592
Discussion
Al.
A2.
A3.
A4.
A5.
A6.